^_ ^_. Sanctuary West UV 14 «1. Aerial Site Map. 1 inch = 16,667 feet. 1 inch RL= 1,042 feet. Vicinity Map. Zoning Map.

Similar documents
W Harmony Rd. Group Home

1215 Shields Street Development PDR

Conceptual Review Agenda

Staybridge Suites. Aerial Site Map CCR POL. 1 inch = 17,493 feet. 1 inch = 250 feet. Vicinity Map. Zoning Map RL.

Harmony Commons, Lot 1 Office

Drake Rd & College Ave Spradley Barr Redevelopmentl

Penny Flats North Mixed-Use Residential

Preliminary Design Review. Poudre Garage Mixed Use December 14, 2015

Jason Holland 4/8/2015 x. *BOLDED ITEMS ARE REQUIRED* *The more info provided, the more detailed your comments from staff will be.

Conceptual Review Agenda

Conceptual Review Agenda

*BOLDED ITEMS ARE REQUIRED* *The more info provided, the more detailed your comments from staff will be.* Project Name

Conceptual Review Agenda

Conceptual Review Agenda

PDR /21/15 Noah Beals 1/7/15 xx

Harmony Technology Park Third Filing, Second Replat Custom Blending, Project Development Plan/Final Development Plan - FDP #130021

Conceptual Review Agenda

EXHIBIT B PROJECT NARRATIVE POULSBO MEADOWS

Conceptual Review Agenda

Conceptual Review Agenda

Section 9 NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN

2.0 AREA PLANS. Lakeside Business District. Lakeside Business District Land Use Categories:

14 October 10, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT: MPB, INC

Request Modification of Proffers Approved by City Council on May 8, 2012 Modification of Conditions (Mini- Warehouse) Staff Recommendation Approval

CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

Sanford/Lee County Technical Review Committee (TRC) DEADLINES & MEETING DATES

Conceptual Review Agenda

SECTION 6 - LAND USE - RURAL RESIDENTIAL

CITY OF FORT COLLINS TYPE 1 ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING FINDINGS AND DECISION. CS Commercial, LLC 1337 Riverside Avenue, Unit 1 Fort Collins, CO 80524

CITY OF FORT COLLINS TYPE 1 ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING FINDINGS AND DECISION. Elevations Credit Union (2025 S. College Avenue)

CONSENT CALENDAR CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM NO: A.1, A.2 STAFF: LARRY LARSEN

Public may provide comments on the GDP within the next two weeks (December 24)

Asbury Chapel Subdivision Sketch Plan

Design Review Application *Please call prior to submittal meeting to determine applicable fees*

General Location Annex, Rezone & Preliminary Plat Lansdowne Addition, Unit Three

ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts

Conceptual Review Agenda

Applicant Name Phone / Fax / Address City State Zip Code . Property Owner Phone / Fax / Address City State Zip Code

Infill Residential Design Guidelines

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: May 18, 2017

PLANNING COMMISSION. Agenda Item # 3

Project Narrative Proposed Hillcrest Country Club Property Redevelopment Final Site Plan Application July 6, 2015 Revised: October 30, 2015

RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT / SUBDIVISION AND REZONING CONCEPT AND DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLAN SUBMITTAL NARRATIVE

Zoning Interface: Districts and Forms for Sioux Falls Zoning Ordinance

Eastcreek Farm. Planned Development Standards September, 2014

STAFF REPORT. Planning and Zoning Case 16-17FDP Staff: Mike Peterman, City Planner Date: April 25, 2016

12 January 12, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT: TAILWIND DEVELOPMENT GROUP,LLC PROPERTY OWNER: CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH

September 15 th and 27 th Public Workshops Summary

TEN MILE & FRANKLIN LAND 39± ACRES 2954 WEST FRANKLIN ROAD MERIDIAN, ID

Developer s Program. The Station at East 54

GREENBANK DEVELOPMENT MASTERPLAN

Neighborhood Districts

APPENDIX A 6 CONCEPTUAL PRELIMINARY PLAN GUIDE AND CHECKLIST FOR MAJOR SUBDIVISIONS CARRBORO DEVELOPMENT GUIDE APPENDIX A

Drexel, Barrell & Co.

OCEANSIDE DEVELOPER S CONFERENCE. 1. 9:30-10:30 a.m. Proposed hotel on a 12,000 sq. ft. site at the northeast corner of Topeka St. and Tremont St.

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

Planning Commission Staff Report Project Plan Approval Hearing Date: June 14, 2017

SECTION ONE North East Industrial Zone Design Guide Palmerston North City Council June 2004

M E M O R A N D U M November 9, 2018

Urban Design Brief Proposed Residential Development 5219 Upper Middle Road City of Burlington

APPLICATION FOR REZONING PROPERTY CITY OF HOLLAND, MICHIGAN. Name of Applicant. Address, and Phone # of Applicant

City of Lafayette Study Session Staff Report Design Review Commission

Planning Districts INTRODUCTION

Secrest Short Cut and Monroe Expressway Small Area Plan AUGUST 29, 2018

M E M O R A N D U M SITE DATA

Application Number: SD Project Name: Walton Farms Preliminary Subdivision (acting as Master Plan)

Watertown City Council

Michael D, Harvey, Current Planning Supervisor. This project was originally approved in 2012 by the BOCC and is summarized as follows:

Master Zoning Plan for the Northeast Property. in El Paso, Texas. Approved August Master Zoning Plan for the Northeast Property. City of.

Behnke Ranch Property, Pasco County: Master Plan Development Approach

Drexel, Barrell & Co.

Landscape Design Requirements and Guidelines for Private Lots in the Old Town North Neighborhood

Site Design (Table 2) Fact Sheet & Focus Questions:

Colerain Township report to. Hamilton County Regional Planning Commission. December 2, 2010, 1:00PM. t a f f r e p o r t

Baumgarten MPUD. Exhibit 3 Evaluation Criteria


COLVER ROAD INDUSTRIAL CONCEPT PLAN

Mitchell Ranch South MPUD Application for Master Planned Unit Development Approval Project Narrative. Introduction

Agenda Item. Applicant Logan Virginia Properties, LLC Property Owners Byler Azalea, LLC & Gateway Free Will Baptist Chuch

CHAPTER 2 SUMMARY 1. PROJECT SUMMARY DATA

Ten Mile Creek Planning Area

Checklists. Project Name: Location: File Number: Date of Submittal: Reviewer: Date: Applicant: Contact Name: Phone Number:

This Review Is Divided Into Two Phases:

CHAPTER 7: VISION AND ACTION STATEMENTS. Noble 2025 Vision Statement

SITE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM NO: 5 STAFF: LONNA THELEN FILE NO: CPC CU QUASI-JUDICIAL ART C. KLEIN CONSTRUCTION

MEMORANDUM. I2 District Downtown Parking Overlay District 24,000 square feet /.55 acres. Industrial Employment District North Loop Small Area Plan

Department of Community Development. Planning and Environmental Review Division Revised Notice of Preparation

TREE REMOVAL PERMIT PACKET

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA. ITEM NO: 6.a 6.b STAFF: LONNA THELEN

Old Town Neighborhoods Plan. Choices Event Wednesday, December 9, 2015

BYLAW C A Bylaw of Rocky View County to amend Land Use Bylaw C

CHAPTER 22 Rural Open Space Community Developments

2. Form and Character. 2.1 Introduction. 2.2 The Downtown Addition Plan. 2.1 Introduction

13. PRELIMINARY PLAT NO MILLS FARM - Vicinity of the southeast corner of 159 th Street and Quivira Road

REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION 6A AGENDA ITEM ORIGINATING DEPT. AGENDA ITEM CITY ADMINISTRATOR APPROVAL

SEMSWA s Role in the Land Development Process

Major Subdivision Sketch Plan Checklist

Illustration of Eastlake Farmer s Cooperative Grain Elevator. Chapter 5: implementation 5-1

Westwood Shopping Center Sketch Plan, Plan # February 23, 2017 Item # 9

RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS

Transcription:

Sitzman Way Briarwood Rd Briarwood Rd Taft Hill Lemay Timberline S Impala Dr Sanctuary West W Hartman St UE W Magnolia St Arlene Dr 287 Vicinity Map ^_ ^_ ^_ Cherry St Shields Zoning Map Sunrise Ln UV 14 «1 N Hollywood St 287 Prospect Horsetooth Irish Elementary Cherry St S Hollywood St W Olive St Cherry Ln Laporte Ave RL Harmony Irish Dr Trilby Poudre Sr High Drake 287 W Woodford Ave Douglas Havel Ave 25 Mountain Vista Vine Mulberry W Vine Dr Poudre Community Academy N Sunset St S Sunset St 25 25 1 inch = 16,667 feet N Impala Dr RL Psd Support Services Psd Administration Hillcrest Dr N Briarwood Rd Tarragon Ln W Vine Dr LMN N Taft Hill Rd LMN POL W Oak St 1 inch RL= 1,042 feet Sunrise Ln Irish Elementary Psd Administration Irish Dr Cherry St Psd Support Services Poudre Sr High W Olive St N Impala Dr Dr la S Impa I m pala Cir Hillcrest Dr ild C herry Ln Trevor St N Hillcrest Dr N Briarwood Rd Coriander Ln Bellwether Ln Tarragon Ln W Oak St Aerial Site Map Liberty Dr Briarwood Rd N Montview Rd Basil Ln Mercer Dr Pennsylvania St Grandview Cemetery City Park Nine Golf Course Woodford Ct S Taft Hill Rd N Taft Hill Rd N Taft Hill Rd 1 inch = 667 feet These map products and all underlying data are developed for use by the City of Fort Collins for its internal purposes only, and were not designed or intended for general use by members of the public. The City makes no representation or warranty as to its accuracy, timeliness, or completeness, and in particular, its accuracy in labeling or displaying dimensions, contours, property boundaries, or placement of location of any map features thereon. THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS MAKES NO WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR WARRANTY FOR FITNESS OF USE FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, WITH RESPECT TO THESE MAP PRODUCTS OR THE UNDERLYING DATA. Any users of these map products, map applications, or data, accepts same AS IS, WITH ALL FAULTS, and assumes all responsibility of the use thereof, and further covenants and agrees to hold the City harmless from and against all damage, loss, or liability arising from any use of this map product, in consideration of the City's having made this information available. Independent verification of all data contained herein should be obtained by any users of these products, or underlying data. The City disclaims, and shall not be held liable for any and all damage, loss, or liability, whether direct, indirect, or consequential, which arises or may arise from these map products or the use thereof by any person or entity.

Development Review Guide STEP 2 of 8 PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW: APPLICATION General Information Preliminary design review is an opportunity for an applicant to discuss the requirements, standards, procedure, and potential modifications of standards or variances that may be necessary for a project and to generally consider the development proposal design which has been evaluated as a part of the conceptual review process. While the conceptual review process is a general consideration of the development proposal, a Preliminary Design Review considers the development proposal in greater detail. Problems of both a major and minor nature can be identified and solved during the preliminary design review before a formal application is made. Preliminary design review applications must be submitted to City Staff no later than 5 pm, two weeks prior to the Wednesday meeting date. Application materials can be e-mailed to currentplanning@fcgov.com or sent to/dropped off at 281 North College Avenue. Representatives of Community Development and Neighborhood Services (Zoning, Environmental Planning, Current Planning, and Development Review Engineering), Light and Power, Stormwater, Water/Waste Water, Advance Planning (Long Range Planning and Transportation Planning), Historic Preservation and Poudre Fire Authority regularly attend preliminary design review meetings. Additionally, other public or quasi-public agencies which may be impacted by the development project are invited and encouraged to attend the preliminary design review. These agencies may include the gas utility, water and/or wastewater utility districts, ditch companies, railroads, cable television service providers and other similar agencies. Upon receipt of a preliminary development proposal for review, and after review of such proposal with the applicant, the staff shall furnish the applicant with written comments and recommendations regarding such proposal in order to inform and assist the applicant prior to preparing components of the development application. The staff shall provide the applicant with a critical issues list, which will identify those critical issues that have surfaced in the preliminary design review as issues that must be resolved during the review process of the formal development application. To the extent that there is a misunderstanding or a misrepresentation of facts, the opinion of the staff may change during the course of development review. Section to be filled out by City Staff Date of Meeting Submittal Date Project Planner Fee Paid ($500) *BOLDED ITEMS ARE REQUIRED* *The more info provided, the more detailed your comments from staff will be.* Project Name Project Address (parcel # if no address) Contact Name(s) and Role(s) (Please identify whether Consultant or Owner, etc) Business Name (if applicable) Applicant Mailing Address Phone Number E-mail Address Basic Description of Proposal (a detailed narrative is also required) Zoning Proposed Use Existing Use Total Building Square Footage S.F. Number of Stories Lot Dimensions Age of any Existing Structures Info available on Larimer County s Website: http://www.co.larimer.co.us/assessor/query/search.cfm *If any structures are 50+ years old, good quality, color photos of all sides of the structure are required. Increase in Impervious Area S.F. (Approximate amount of additional building, pavement, or etc. that will cover existing bare ground to be added to the site) Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580

Development Review Guide STEP 2 of 8 SUBMITTAL INFORMATION: PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW (PDR) 1) Preliminary Design Review Application form and filing fee ($500). 2) Project Narrative Please include the following information: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) (k) (l) What are you proposing/use? What improvements and uses currently exist on the site? Describe the site circulation (auto and pedestrian), parking and how it coordinates with the existing neighborhood. Describe site design and architecture. How is your proposal compatible with the surrounding area? Is water detention provided? If so, where? (show on site plan) How does the site drain now (on and off site)? Will it change? If so, what will change? What is being proposed to treat run-off? How does the proposal impact natural features? Do any existing structures have automatic fire sprinklers? Will the new structures have fire sprinklers? Are there any unusual factors and/or characteristics are present that may restrict or affect your proposal? Have you previously submitted an application? (m) What specific questions, if any, do you want addressed? 3) Site Plan Please consider including the following: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) Project site boundary and adjacent property uses Proposed circulation system, and how it ties into existing infrastructure (pedestrian and auto) Existing and proposed landscaping (Will trees be removed?) Existing and proposed buildings (Will they remain? If they will change, how?) Existing natural features (Will these be impacted by the proposal?) On and off site improvements Location of detention, drainage and water quality features Emergency vehicle access and fire hydrant locations Community Development & Neighborhood Services 281 N College Ave Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580

Sanctuary West Preliminary Development Review Narrative: A. Sanctuary West will be a dynamic new residential community in North Fort Collins. Drawing from the agricultural character of the area., Tthe architecture and site amenities are planned to have a modern farm and mid-century contemporary craftsman feel. It will be a mix of housing types ranging from two-family attached to 12 unit multi-family buildings and a senior housing continuum of care campus. Commented [DP1]: Will this be the name for the overall project? East and West parcels together? The site is located just north of Poudre High School on the North side of Laporte Avenue. The western eastern boundary borders Taft Hill Road and the site is divided by New Mercer Ditch. The west portion of the site is within the City limits and is zoned Low Density Mixed-Use Neighborhood (LMN). The plan proposes a mix of two family dwellings, single family attached and multi-family buildings. The area east of New Mercer ditch is currently not within the City limits. It will be annexed and zoned followed by a Project Development Plan (PDP) submittal. Due to the anticipated use of continuum senior care, Medium Density Mixed-Use Neighborhood (MMN) zoning is being proposed which varies from the LMN zoning shown on the Structure Plan. The east side of the project will also contain a park, community club house, and activity area for both the residential and senior housing users. B. There are currently no structures on the sitethere is one out building on the property which will be removed. There is also an n existing storm water conveyance on the west side of the property that will remain. C. There will be two points of access for vehicles into the neighborhood. There will be an access directly across from Stephens Street on Laporte Avenue with a second entrance along Taft Hill Road. Due to existing development of large storm water channels, extending the streets from the Green Acres Subdivision is not possible and instead will be connected by trails thereby significantly enhancing pedestrian connectivity to Laporte Avenue. In addition, two major pedestrian spines are proposed to connect Soldier Creek Trail to Laporte Avenue. These improvements will bring much needed pedestrian connectivity to this area of the City. Commented [DP2]: We do have part of the barn still there is this an issue? Commented [DP3]: Do we want to maintain the possibility of a third point of access per our discussion with Wonderland? D. Due to the site s irregular shape and existing storm water channels, the site design focuses on small neighborhoods. All of the dwelling units will be served by private drives and/ or alleys coming off of a single local street that runs east west through the site. Most all of the units face landscaped open space maintained by the home owner s association. Terminated vistas will be provided at the ends of major turns in the public road. The development is clustered in small neighborhoods and a modern farm and mid-century contemporary craftsman architectural aesthetic ties the community together. Pitched roof lines compliment the country feel and appearance as described in the Norwest Subarea Plan.

The multi-family units, the two-family attached (duplex) units, and the town home units will be two story with some of the townhome end units and duplexes offering a ranch option. The row homes will be three stories with a roof top deck. These building will utilize pitched roofs with varryingvarying heights to make them feel more like 2.5 story structures. The floor plates of these buildings will also change from floor to floor with the top floor pitched roof areas having as low as a 5-6 foot plate. These architectural features will reduce the massing of these buidlings and their location on the interior of the development will further reduce their prominence within the community. E. Through the placement of housing types, we have made a conscience effort to limit density adjacent to the existing single-family residences while meeting the minimumcoming in less dense on than code allows. density required(the west parcel is currently at 8 du/ac The east parcel is at 5.3 du/ac). E.. Most of the direct adjacencywhere there is adjacency to existing residential, the plan has placed hasthe 2 story duplex and town home units complimenting the existing residential.. The multi family and row homes have been placed in the eastern portion of the western half parcel of the project separated from adjacent housing by public streets and large water channels. In addition, the architecture proposed will complement the rural context of the surrounding area. Formatted: Not Highlight Commented [DP4]: Acreage allows for 234 units and we have 214 make more of a point about the lower than allowed density and how this will provide more open space and make the project feel less dense and more in keeping with the country character of the neighborhood. Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or numbering F. Detention will occur on the southern half of both the eastern and western portions of the site. G. The detention and storm water will follow the current grades of the site and flow to natural low spots. H. Water quality will be provided to treat additional impervious run off. I. The New Mercer ditch flows through the site. An ECS will be provided. The current site plan shows the natural area buffer. Although some buildings and parking will intrude into the buffer zone, the overall aggregate area will exceed the buffer standard by 18,500 s.f. In addition, a trail will be provided from the Soldier Creek trail through the buffer to the southern property boundary. J. The multi-family buildings will have automatic fire sprinklers. What is the current code requirements for the: a. Two family dwellings? b. Single-family attached (3 plex and greater)? K. The irregular shape of the site along with the existing storm water facilities make the site difficult to develop. As a result, we are using pedestrian spines to create a livable community focusing on the existing and proposed open space. This will require modifications to the 350 pedestrian spine standard as well as street spacing. Additional Modifications requiredin Commented [DP5]: Should we list out our requested modifications of standard including 3 story buildings, 350 pedestrian spine, etc. and then list how we are providing equal to or better than offsets for these things? Ted has said over and over again that this is the key to getting these modifications approved. Formatted: Not Highlight

addition we will be asking for a modification to have 3 stories on the row homes.?the justifications will be based upon the generous buffer from the adjacent residential that localizing density allows along with the high percentage of open space. L. This project was submitted as a PDP and FDP in 2008 as Sanctuary West. Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight M. Questions: a. What are the automatic fire sprinkler requirements for the two family and single family attached buildings? b. The loop drive on both the east and west end of the western portion of the site exceed 660. If these drives are to be public alleys, would a variance be viable. If they are private, is there an issue with the length. c. There is an existing right of way off set from Briarwood. We would like this to be gated emergency access only with an enhancea pedestrian corridor. Is that acceptable? d. All dwelling units are alley loaded. Much of the street in single loaded. In the areas with single loaded street, can we have a residential local cross section instead of the connector local? e. Additional questions? Commented [DP6]: Bill We were going to consider making this a usable access point in case Wonderland wants to develop the west parcel before the east parcel develops or develop the west parcel in stages. Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Numbered + Level: 2 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.75" + Indent at: 1"

^ s^- Jf.r,c'::'1' r.4:,;t.:r

,fr 'E _.d

.',...: :x!

Paired Homes STREETSCENE art and architecture PAIRED HOMES WONDERLAND HOMES Job 18007 DATE 23 MAY 2018 1

art and architecture PLAN 1 & 2 MODERN FARMHOUSE PAIRED HOMES WONDERLAND HOMES Job 18007 DATE 23 MAY 2018 2

art and architecture PLAN 1 & 3 MODERN FARMHOUSE PAIRED HOMES WONDERLAND HOMES Job 18007 DATE 23 MAY 2018 3

art and architecture PLAN 1 & 2 MIDCENTURY MODERN PAIRED HOMES WONDERLAND HOMES Job 18007 DATE 23 MAY 2018

art and architecture PLAN 1 & 3 MIDCENTURY MODERN PAIRED HOMES WONDERLAND HOMES Job 18007 DATE 23 MAY 2018

Conceptual Street Scene Wonderland Homes - Sanctuary Concepts May 7, 2018

3 Unit Rowhome - Conceptual Front Elevation Wonderland Homes - Sanctuary Concepts May 7, 2018

3 Unit Rowhome - Front Perspective 3 Unit Rowhome - Rear Perspective 3 Unit Rowhome - Front Perspective Wonderland Homes - Sanctuary Concepts May 7, 2018

4 Unit Rowhome - Conceptual Front Elevation Wonderland Homes - Sanctuary Concepts May 7, 2018

4 Unit Rowhome - Front Perspective 4 Unit Rowhome - Rear Perspective 4 Unit Rowhome - Front Perspective Wonderland Homes - Sanctuary Concepts May 7, 2018

144'-4" SANCTUARY WEST 38'-2" 27'-1" 38'-2" 38'-2" MAIN LEVEL A1 03/28/18 36'-5 1/2" UNIT 3A UNIT 1B UNIT 3A UNIT 3A UNITS COUNT UNIT 3A 4 UNIT 2A 4 UNIT 1A 2 UNIT 1B 2 80'-0 1/2" 1-CAR GARAGE 2-CAR GARAGE TANDEM GARAGE TANDEM GARAGE TANDEM GARAGE TANDEM GARAGE TANDEM GARAGE TANDEM GARAGE TANDEM GARAGE TANDEM GARAGE 43'-7" GARAGE GARAGE 1 1ST LEVEL - SD 3/32" = 1'-0" 303.455.4437 5975 S. QUEBEC ST., STE. 250 CENTENNIAL, CO 80111

144'-4" SANCTUARY WEST 38'-2" 26'-11" 38'-2" 38'-2" UPPER LEVEL A2 03/30/18 UNIT 3A 3A UNIT 1B 1A UNIT 3A 2A UNIT 3A 2A UNITS COUNT 68'-8" 32'-0" 36'-0" UNIT 2B UNIT 1A UNIT 1B UNIT 3A UNIT 3A 4 UNIT 2A 4 UNIT 1A 2 UNIT 1B 2 1 2ND LEVEL - SD 3/32" = 1'-0" 303.455.4437 5975 S. QUEBEC ST., STE. 250 CENTENNIAL, CO 80111

SANCTUARY WEST MASSING MODEL A3 03/30/18 5 FRONT CORNER 3 SIDE 2 FRONT 4 REAR CORNER 1 REAR 303.455.4437 5975 S. QUEBEC ST., STE. 250 CENTENNIAL, CO 80111