Regional Transportation District

Similar documents
Southeast Extension to RidgeGate Parkway Scoping Booklet

1.0 PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED

Right-of-Way Acquisitions and Relocations Technical Memorandum

Northwest Rail Corridor and US 36 BRT Development Oriented Transit Analysis 4.4 STATION AREA FINDINGS

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION

3.5 VISUAL AND AESTHETIC QUALITIES

1.0 Introduction. Purpose and Basis for Updating the TMP. Introduction 1

RESOLUTION NO. R Refining the route, profile and stations for the Downtown Redmond Link Extension

East Corridor Final Environmental Impact Statement

F-1. C-470 Multimodal Corridor Vision: US-6 to I-25

CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation

Chapter 1.0 Introduction

Knoxville Area Transit (KAT) Transit Development Plan Corridor Analysis

P LAN PURPOSE AND PROCESS

Atlanta BeltLine Corridor Environmental Study. Scoping Meeting August 2008

Eastern Terminus TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM CENTRAL BROWARD EAST-WEST TRANSIT ANALYSIS BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

3.5 VISUAL AND AESTHETIC QUALITIES

3 MARKHAM NORTH-SOUTH LINK CORRIDOR PUBLIC TRANSIT IMPROVEMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT UPDATE

Route 110 Alternatives Analysis

Eglinton West LRT Update

SH 199 Corridor Master Plan. Community Meeting No. 2 May 31, 2017

From SH-121 to E-470. Website:

Implementation Guide Comprehensive Plan City of Allen

WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE OPEN HOUSE?

Floodplain Technical Memorandum

Isabel Neighborhood Plan: Alternatives

Mississippi Skyway Preliminary Engineering Report

Issues Requiring Future Study

7.0 FINAL SECTION 4(f) AND 6(f) EVALUATION

PROJECT BACKGROUND. Preliminary Design Scope and Tasks

Transportation Committee

West Broadway Transit Study Initial Screening of Alternatives Memo

PREPARED FOR: PLATTEVIEW ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

7.0 DRAFT SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION

TOWN COUNCIL / PLANNING COMMISSION

Mavis Road Class Environmental Assessment

112th Avenue Light Rail Options Concept Design Report JUNE 2010 PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY TBG PGH

DOMINION BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN A MODEL FOR CHESAPEAKE S FUTURE

Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan

I. INTRODUCTION. Project Background and Study Area

Scope of Services. River Oaks Boulevard (SH 183) Corridor Master Plan

Appendix E: Evaluation of Network Alternatives - July 2017

Staff Report and Recommendation

LEED-ND 101: Practical Strategies for Achieving Sustainability Goals. Travis Parker Lakewood Planning Director

MAIN STREET ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY

Burloak Drive Grade Separation

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 TH 14 WEST STUDY AREA Project Description Functional Classification Purpose of the Project

Access Management: An Overview

The transportation system in a community is an

St. Clair Avenue West Area Transportation Master Plan

LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (LACMTA)

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of January 28, 2017 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT

Executive Summary. NY 7 / NY 2 Corridor

12/9/2013. HOLLYWOOD/PINES CORRIDOR PROJECT AMPO 2013 Annual Conference October 24, Our Perspective. Broward.

Planning Districts INTRODUCTION

Shift Rapid Transit Public Participation Meeting May 3, 2017

METRO Gold Line BRT CBAC Meeting. August 23, 2018

Corridor Vision. 1Pursue Minnehaha-Hiawatha Community Works Project. Mission of Hennepin County Community Works Program

Kanata Light Rail Transit Planning and Environmental Assessment Study

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Appendix A - Initially Considered Alternatives Screening

Northern Branch Corridor SDEIS March Table of Contents

Appendix E Section 4(f) Evaluation

Existing Transportation System 5-1

Planning and New Starts Development Committee. February 25, 2016

NORTH-SOUTH CORRIDOR STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Executive Summary

Secrest Short Cut and Monroe Expressway Small Area Plan AUGUST 29, 2018

SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR EXTENSION. Environmental Evaluation and Basic Engineering Results PUBLIC MEETING/OPEN HOUSE November 18, 2009

South Davis County COMMUNITY SPOTLIGHT

3. ELEMENTS OF THE METRO VISION 2035 PLAN

GAINING LEVERAGE through

PLANNING COORDINATING COMMITTEE

I. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION... 1 A. General Description... 1 B. Historical Resume and Project Status... 2 C. Cost Estimates...

Project Update. Hillsborough County 2045 Population and Employment Projections and Allocations. Board of County Commissioners February 13, 2018

Acting Director, Transportation Services Division. p:\2010\cluster B\TRA\EtobicokeYork\eycc tp

Public input has been an important part of the plan development process.

Definitions. Average Daily Traffic Demand (ADT): The actual number or projected number of cars that pass a point in a 24-hour period.

LAND USE MODEL UPDATE. Planning and Land Use Advisory Committee Meeting #2 September 4, 2014

BIBLIOGRAPHY DOCUMENT 8

Ann Arbor Intermodal Station Environmental Review

Harlem Avenue Corridor Plan: Corridor Planning Across Municipal Boundaries

Potential Green Infrastructure Strategies May 6, 2015 Workshop

Northwest commuter rail station US 36 BRT. Westminster Station

MURRAY CENTRAL STATION MASTER PLAN Central Station Area of Influence and Site Analysis

Dallas CBD Second Light Rail Alignment (D2)

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of January 28, 2017 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT-2

Dallas CBD Second Light Rail Alignment (D2)

METRO Gold Line BRT CMC Meeting

Economic Development & Housing Council Committee Comprehensive Plan Update September 20, 2005

Urban Planning and Land Use

Don Mills Crossing Study and Celestica Lands Development Application Community Meeting, Open House, and Breakout Discussions

City of Toronto. Emery Village Transportation Master Plan

TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

WELCOME and introduction

South Fulton Parkway Transit Feasibility Study

Town of Castle Rock DRCOG 2013 Annual Growth and Development Report. Introduction. Section 1 Metro Vision 2035

3.5. Visual and Aesthetic Qualities

3.2 LAND USE, ZONING, AND ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS

State Highway 121 Southwest Parkway. Fort Worth s Transportation Success Story in Design and Cooperation

Subarea 4 Indian Creek. Vision The combination of park networks and transportation amenities make Subarea 4 the greenest hub in the Corridor.

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 5H

Transcription:

NORTHEAST AREA TRANSIT EVALUATION FINAL REPORT Prepared for: Regional Transportation District Prepared by: David Evans and Associates, Inc. URS, Corporation November 2007

LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Northeast Area Transit Evaluation Study Area... 3 Figure 2: NATE Study Schedule... 4 Figure 3: Existing Land Use Map... 7 Figure 4: Environmental Resources Map... 9 Figure 5: Existing Transit System Map... 12 Figure 6: 2030 Total Population... 14 Figure 7: Total Population Increase Year 2005 to 2030... 15 Figure 8: 2030 Population Density... 16 Figure 9: 2030 Total Employment...17 Figure 10: Total Employment Increase Year 2005 to 2030... 18 Figure 11: 2030 Employment Density... 19 Figure 12: 2030 Person Trips To/From Northeast Transit Evaluation Study Area... 21 Figure 13: Future Land Use Map... 24 Figure 14: Alternative Alignments Map... 54 Figure 15: Potential Station Location Map... 57 Figure 16: Transit Circulator Map... 58 Figure 17: Roadway Cross Sections... 67 Figure 18: Potential North Metro Corridor Connection Alignment... 70 Figure 19: Cross-Country Alignment Options... 71 David Evans and Associates, Inc. ii November 2007

TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...1 PROJECT DEFINITION... 1 PROJECT GOAL... 1 PROJECT OBJECTIVES... 2 EXISTING AND FUTURE CONDITIONS...5 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 FUTURE CONDITIONS... 13 FUTURE TRAVEL PATTERNS... 19 FUTURE TRAVEL PATTERNS... 20 LOCAL PLAN AND POLICY REVIEW...29 RELATED PLANS/DOCUMENTS... 29 ROADWAYS... 29 INTERCHANGES... 29 OPERATIONAL, POLICY AND DESIGN ANALYSIS...43 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT (RTD)... 43 COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CDOT)... 43 POTENTIAL RAIL ALIGNMENTS... 45 AREA-WIDE CORRIDOR PRESERVATION AND LAND DEVELOPMENT... 46 TECHNOLOGY CONSIDERATIONS...49 INITIAL ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION...53 INITIAL ALTERNATIVES... 53 POTENTIAL STATION LOCATIONS... 54 POTENTIAL STATION LOCATIONS... 55 INITIAL SCREENING RESULTS... 59 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS... 66 ACTION STRATEGIES AND FUTURE CONSIDERATIONS...73 NEAR-TERM STRATEGIES... 75 LONG-TERM STRATEGIES... 77 David Evans and Associates, Inc. i November 2007

LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Trip Distribution... 20 Table 2: Recommended Improvement Projects - Northeast Area Transit Evaluation... 35 Table 3: Fiscally Constrained 2030 RTP Roadway and Rapid Transit Capital Improvements - Northeast Area Transit Evaluation... 38 Table 4: General Design Parameters... 43 Table 5: UP Grade Crossings... 46 Table 6: BNSF Grade Crossings...46 Table 7: Preliminary Screening Results... 59 Table 8: Northeast Area Transit Evaluation Action Strategies and Future Considerations... 74 David Evans and Associates, Inc. iii November 2007

Figure 1: Northeast Area Transit Evaluation Study Area David Evans and Associates, Inc. 3 November 2007

Project Objectives Northeast Area Transit Evaluation The objectives of the NATE study include: 1. Provide fatal flaw analyses to ascertain alignment option(s) and appropriate technologies. 2. Identify strategies to improve mobility along the selected alignment(s) using funds contained within the FasTracks program. 3. Recommend strategies that maximize the use of these programmed funds. 4. Recommend a list of potential investments to preserve alignment options. David Evans and Associates, Inc. 2 November 2007

INTRODUCTION This report presents a summary of the Northeast Area Transit Evaluation (NATE) study and provides an overview of potential implementation strategies that would support fixed-guideway transit opportunities within Denver s northeast metropolitan area. The focus of this area as a corridor to study evolved from the Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) of the North Metro Corridor Major Investment Study (MIS), which recommended a need to study future potential fixed-guideway transit opportunities between Denver and Brighton. The preservation of fixed-guideway transit opportunities within this corridor is also listed in Denver Regional Council of Government s (DRCOG) Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) as a Tier 2 component of the regional transit system. The study examines potential options to invest $7.3 million allocated in the Regional Transportation District s (RTD) FasTracks program toward the preservation of fixedguideway transit between Denver and Brighton. The information documented in this report represents the culmination of a process that included input from a working committee made up of local government representatives, as well as an assessment of the technical issues associated with a new transit system within the northeast metro area. The major steps in the study included: Review of existing transportation facilities, services and conditions in the study area Development and evaluation of three overall alternative concepts for transit service Evaluation of potential transit technologies Analysis to determine potential investment opportunities and identification of strategies to support implementation of a fixed-guideway transit system Project Definition The NATE study examines how to use $7.3 million approved in the FasTracks Plan to preserve land for a future transit line. As the land and transportation infrastructure in the northeastern part of the metro area continues to develop, space for high-capacity transit will be increasingly hard to come by. This study investigates right-of-way (ROW) preservation opportunities for future high-capacity transit between Denver and Brighton. The study area is generally located between US 85 and I-76, north and east of Commerce City to the Weld County line (see Figure 1, Northeast Area Transit Evaluation Study Area). Project Goal The goal of the NATE study is to work with municipalities and jurisdictions within the study area to investigate options to extend future, post-fastracks, fixed guideway bus and/or rail transit improvements between Denver and Brighton with direct connection to the FasTracks system. However, alternative alignments to connect to the North Metro Corridor are presented and discussed near the end of this report. David Evans and Associates, Inc. 1 November 2007

LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS AASHTO BNSF BRT CBD CDOT DIA DMU DRCOG DUS EA EIS EMU FTA FY HOV IGA LPA LRT MIS NATE NEPA PUC ROW RTD RTP SH TAZ TMO TOD UP WCR American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Burlington Northern Santa Fe (Rail line) Bus Rapid Transit Denver Central Business District Colorado Department of Transportation Denver International Airport Diesel Multiple Unit Denver Regional Council of Governments Denver Union Station Environmental Assessment Environmental Impact Statement Electrified Multiple Unit Federal Transit Administration Fiscal Year High Occupancy Vehicle Intergovernmental Agreement Locally Preferred Alternative Light Rail Transit Major Investment Study Northeast Area Transit Evaluation National Environmental Policy Act Public Utilities Commission Right of Way Regional Transportation District Regional Transportation Plan State Highway Traffic Analysis Zones Transportation Management Organization Transit Oriented Development Union Pacific Railroad Weld County Road David Evans and Associates, Inc. iv November 2007

The study generally followed the attached schedule (see Figure 2). A public open house was not included in this study, rather study recommendations were presented at council meetings and a county commission meeting. In addition, a total of three meetings were held with community groups, advisory boards, and local developers to share findings and recommendations. Figure 2: NATE Study Schedule October-06 November-06 December-06 January-07 February-07 March-April-07 Task 1: Project Definition/Define Goals and Objectives Task 2: Data Collection and Policy Analysis Task 3: Alignments Identification & Evaluation/Technology Considerations Alternatives Development Work Session Task 4: Recommend Feasible Investment Options Brighton City Council Presentation Task 5: Recommend Immediate Action Strategies & Schedule for Improvements Draft Report Task 6: Final Documentation Stakeholder Mtgs City Council/County Commission Oct. 2, 2006 Nov. 8, 2006 Dec. 6, 2006 Feb. 6, 2007 March 7, 2007 David Evans and Associates, Inc. 4 November 2007

Adams County Much of the land within the study area that is under the jurisdiction of Adams County is either large tracts of agricultural or low density residential uses, or in smaller enclave parcels located within properties that are under the jurisdiction of the City of Brighton and Commerce City. An Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) between Commerce City (and possibly with Brighton) and Adams County is required for development in the city limits if water service is needed. Existing Environmental Conditions A review of environmental conditions within the study area was conducted to determine baseline environmental resources that may be a factor in planning decisions. As shown in Figure 4, Environmental Resources Map, multiple floodplain areas exist throughout the study area. Large waterbodies in the general area include Barr Lake State Park and the Platte River. Creeks that extend through the study area from the Platte River include First Creek, which crosses the study area at 104 th Avenue, Second Creek, which crosses the study area near 136 th Avenue, and Third Creek, which crosses the study area at approximately 144 th Avenue. The waterway areas widen as they flow further east. A large floodplain area exists east of US 85 and north of E-470 near the Union Pacific (UP) tracks. Another floodplain area exists within the area of 104 th Avenue and US 85. Each of these floodplains extends across the study area. In the south portion of the study area, Sand Creek is located just south of I-270. Crossing Sand Creek by the railroads presents a challenge since the BNSF-Chicago line UP-Greeley line and UP- Boulder line converge to cross at a single location. Large parks and open space areas include Barr Lake State Park and Rocky Mountain Wildlife Refuge. Native plants and sensitive areas may exist near these park areas which may require further evaluation. David Evans and Associates, Inc. 8 November 2007

Figure 3: Existing Zoning/Land Use Map Northeast Area Transit Evaluation David Evans and Associates, Inc. 7 November 2007

redevelopment process. A vacant swath of land exists on both sides of the existing rail tracks through the downtown area. A core area development of note is the Brighton Pavilions, a commercial development located just south of the existing RTD park-n-ride. In the vicinity of I-76 to E-470, existing development includes residences and businesses along 104 th Avenue, gravel mining to the west on 112 th Avenue and Nome Street, and residential/business development north of 120 th Avenue. Undeveloped areas are uncultivated or used for agricultural purposes. Commerce City The Derby redevelopment area is planned as the primary downtown area for Commerce City. The Derby area is located in a triangular-shaped property bounded by the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) rail line, 72 nd Avenue, and Quebec Street and will feature mixed-use development. The Prairie Gateway area is located in a narrow parcel of land that extends from 56 th Avenue, north to 64 th Avenue, and is bounded by Quebec Street. The Wembly Arena, located along 64 th Avenue and bordered to the west by the BNSF rail line, has been identified by Commerce City as a future Transit-Oriented Development site. Public facilities of note include the new soccer facility for the Colorado Rapids, which is currently being built on the east side of Quebec Street at approximately 60 th Avenue, and the Commerce City government facilities (City Hall), located just east of Quebec Street on 56 th Avenue. The Dunes and Bell Creek developments are two large residential areas along US 85. Another significant residential development located close to the study area is Reunion, which is a master planned community located east of SH 2 and west of Tower Road along 104 th Avenue. Existing Derby Redevelopment area David Evans and Associates, Inc. 6 November 2007

EXISTING AND FUTURE CONDITIONS The Northeast Denver metropolitan area is a rapidly developing area of residential, office, industrial, commercial and recreational development. As land in this area continues to develop and the roadway network is expanded, space for high-capacity transit will be increasingly hard to preserve. The NATE study was undertaken to examine options for use of the funds allocated in the FasTracks program to secure ROW preservation between Denver and Brighton for future fixed-guideway transit. The purpose of this section is to identify existing and future conditions within the study area in an effort to highlight potential issues, opportunities and constraints as it relates to the use of fixed-guideway transit. Existing Conditions Demographics Employment and population density information was compiled based on DRCOG land use data. The use of DRCOG data is important since this regionally approved database is required for subsequent Federal Transit Administration (FTA) approvals. Land use information is based on plans and data submitted to DRCOG by communities within the study area. For the purposes of this study, existing condition data is based on year 2005 information. Future conditions are based on year 2030 projections. Existing Land Use Land Use information was obtained from the cities of Brighton and Commerce City and from Adams County. Existing zoning information and future land use information was gathered via existing maps provided by the jurisdictions. This information was compiled into a single map for the study area (see Figure 3, Existing Zoning/Land Use Map). Note, existing land use information reflects information obtained on city and county maps at the time of this study and may not reflect the most current information. Land use plans and policies from the cities and county were reviewed. In addition, information was provided by municipal and county staff. A summary of current land use information within the study area is provided below. Brighton The Brighton core area is defined as an area bounded by Weld County Road 2 (WCR 2) to the north, Bromley Lane to the south, Buckley Road to the east, and US 85 to the west, with a portion extending west to near the South Platte River. Downtown Brighton north and south of State Highway (SH) 7 (Bridge Street) is an area of ongoing redevelopment, and along with the U.S. 85/Bridge Street park-n-ride, the area is designated as a Transit Oriented Development (TOD) planning area/activity center by DRCOG. City officials view an end-of-line transit station as a key catalyst for the David Evans and Associates, Inc. 5 November 2007

Figure 4: Environmental Resources Map Northeast Area Transit Evaluation David Evans and Associates, Inc. 9 November 2007

Future Conditions Demographics The project team collected current and projected population and employment estimates within the study area to examine projected growth trends and to identify existing and emerging activity areas. Information was obtained from DRCOG for years 2005 to 2030. This information is illustrated in a series of population and employment maps. Areas are defined by Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZ). Population within the study area is expected to increase substantially, with the largest growth occuring north of SH 7 and the area north and south of 104 th Avenue and west of I-76. Other significant growth locations includes an area located immediately east of SH 2 and north of 136 th Avenue. A lesser degree of population growth is expected along the US 85 corridor, and south of 104 th Avenue and west of I-76. The project team collected base level employment data and projected employment information within the study area (see series of employment maps that follow). Locations within the study area that will contain the greatest increase in employment between 2005 and 2030 includes the Prairie Center, located south of Bromley Lane and west of I-76. This development area includes the regional hospital campus and related medical services. Areas south of 104 th Avenue between US 85 and SH 2 is also slated to incur significant employment increases. The Adams County Government Center, located in a triangular piece of property south of E-470, and east of SH 2 and west of I- 76, is expected to attract a moderate employment increase with a total of approximately 2000 employees between 2005 and 2030. Downtown Brighton is also projected to have a moderate employment increase by 2030. The US 85 corridor between E-470 and SH 7 is expected to have a low to moderate employment increase in comparison to other TAZ s within the study area. In order to accurately reflect the 2030 Total Employment and Total Employment Increase in the study area, DRCOG s base information was supplemented with the most recent development plans within the study area, including: Office and retail zoning instead of industrial for the area between US 85 and I-76 and 104th and 112 th Avenues. The increase in residents and commercial/office development from the Adams Crossing Development (124 th Avenue and SH 2). Employment growth from the Adams County Government Center (E-470/SH 2/I- 76). David Evans and Associates, Inc. 13 November 2007

Figure 5: Existing Transit System Map Northeast Area Transit Evaluation David Evans and Associates, Inc. 12 November 2007

be retrofit to accommodate high-capacity rail. The existing facility is a two lane bridge. An issue at the Sable/E-470 interchange may be crossing 3 rd Creek, located just north of the interchange. I-76 I-76 is the primary interstate that extends through the study area. The interstate primarily consists of four lanes with a wide landscaped median, and is a main roadway for travelers between Denver and northeast Colorado. I-76 merges into I-25 in Commerce City. As of 2005, the daily traffic volume in the segment between Brighton and Commerce City averaged 33,375 vehicles per day. Existing Transit Services and Facilities RTD operates local, regional and express bus routes within the study area (see Figure 5, Existing Transit System Map). Three park-n-rides are located in the study area: I-76 northbound at US 85 interchange US 85/Bridge Street park-n-ride, located in downtown Brighton. This park-n-ride features 234 parking spaces, 3 bike rack spaces and no bike lockers. Routes that service this park-n-ride include Route 120 120 th Avenue Crosstown, Route 145X Brighton/DIA Express, Route R Brighton/Denver, and Brighton call-n-ride service. Commerce City park-n-ride. This facility is located at 72nd Avenue and US 85, and features 83 parking spaces, 2 bike rack and 4 bike lockers. Routes that serve this park-n-ride include Route 48 East 48 th Avenue/Commerce City, Route 72 72 nd Avenue Crosstown, and Route R Brighton /Denver. 104th and SH2 park-n-ride. This facility is located in Commerce City, and features 20 parking spaces and no bike rack spaces or bike lockers. The only route that serves this park-n- Ride is Route AA Wagon Road/DIA, which provides service along 104 th Avenue to Denver International Airport (DIA). David Evans and Associates, Inc. 11 November 2007

Existing Transportation Conditions Four primary transportation corridors exist in the study area: SH 2 and US 85 extend north-south in the study area, and E-470 intersects the study area in the area between 124 th and 136 th Avenue. I-76 extends north and east from Denver to the state line in northeast Colorado. A description of each is provided below. Highways SH 2 SH 2 is a main roadway corridor in the study area that serves Commerce City north to its intersection with I-76 near 120 th Avenue. North of 120 th Avenue, SH 2 becomes a two lane arterial road and extends north to SH 7 in downtown Brighton. In Commerce City, SH 2 provides access to the Prairie Gateway development from 72 nd Avenue. This development is a focus of current strategic planning efforts within the city. SH 2 also provides access to the Derby redevelopment area, located near the intersection of 72 nd Avenue and Quebec Street. The City would SH 2 north of 96 th Avenue like SH 2 to be improved to a boulevard design leading to the Derby development area. As of 2005, the daily traffic volume south of the I-76 interchange was 14,875 vehicles per day. North of I-76, daily traffic volumes along SH 2 averaged 9,300 vehicles per day (traffic volume source: 2005 Colorado Highway System Traffic Volume Map). US 85 US 85 is another main roadway corridor within the study area. The highway is a primary thoroughfare between Denver and Brighton, and is primarily a five lane facility with speed limits ranging from 45 mph to 55 mph. Land between the roadway and rail line is largely vacant. One lane of US 85 extends into the UP ROW. As of 2005, the daily traffic volume in the segment between Brighton and Commerce City averaged 37,100 vehicles per day. E-470 US 85 near Bromley Lane Access to the tollway is available from US 85 and I- 76. The typical ROW along E-470 is 300 feet with an additional 75 foot easement on each side of the roadway, which enables the facility to accommodate potential future fixed-guideway transit. As of 2005, the daily traffic volume in the segment within the study area averaged 14,500 vehicles per day. A future interchange with E-470 is planned at Potomac Street. The total ROW of E-470 at Potomac Street is 450 feet. An overpass exists at Sable and E-470. Depending on infrastructure requirements, the Sable overpass could potentially E-470 near 104 th Avenue David Evans and Associates, Inc. 10 November 2007

Figure 6: 2030 Total Population Northeast Area Transit Evaluation David Evans and Associates, Inc. 14 November 2007