Advice from Department of Ecology

Similar documents
Introduction to the Shoreline Master Program (SMP) Update. City of Bellingham Planning Department 2005

Shoreline Master Program Town of La Conner, Washington

EXHIBIT A CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH, FLORIDA COASTAL MANAGEMENT & CONSERVATION

Master Plan for Preservation and Scenic Conservation (1995)

Dwelling Units Max 12 dwelling units per acre/min 8 dwelling units per acre. Development Mix 80% non residential/20% residential

City of Tacoma Shoreline Master Program Update Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting September 10, 2009

Nick Sigmund, Sr. Zoning Officer

Public Visioning City of Kelso Planning Commission

Riparian Buffer on the Bushkill Creek. Policies

Stevens County Partnership Shoreline Master Program Update

Chapter WAC SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM GUIDELINES. Table of Contents WAC AUTHORITY, PURPOSE AND EFFECTS OF GUIDELINES.

SITE PLAN REVIEW ITEMS - REFERENCE CHECKLIST

3700. OLD HOMOSASSA AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN STANDARDS. Aesthetic standards are mandatory for nonresidential projects only.

Chapter 14. Shorelines

BEFORE THE HEARINGS EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY

CITY OF SCANDIA ORDINANCE NO. 174

Staff will be providing an overview of the project need, purpose and intent for consideration as part of the Amendment cycle.

TERRESTRIAL NATURAL HERITAGE SYSTEM STRATEGY APPENDIX F: MODEL POLICIES FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE TARGET TERRESTRIAL NATURAL HERITAGE SYSTEM

Introducing Green Infrastructure for Coastal Resilience

RECREATION, OPEN SPACE AND GREENWAYS ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

Kitsap County Department of Community Development. Hearing Examiner Staff Report and Recommendation

SECTION 1 CLEARING /GRADING PERMIT APPLICATION:

Deb Grube, Sr. Zoning Officer

When planning stormwater management facilities, the following principles shall be applied where possible.

Rule D Wetland and Creek Buffers

Zoning Ordinance Chapter 10

Virginia s Tidal Wetlands: Managing for Resilience. Pam Mason

CLACKAMAS COUNTY ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY REGULATORY IMPEDIMENT GAP ANALYSIS TOOL

MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE Fisheries Division nd Avenue SE. Auburn, Washington

TO: Port of Orcas FROM: Tina Whitman, Science Director SUBJECT: Master Plan Update DATE: September 7, 2018

11/21/2016. Landscaping on the Edge Needs to be Different LANDSCAPES ON THE EDGE ARE DIFFERENT DIFFERENT RULES APPLY. things happen on the edge

CONSERVATION ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

St. Croix County Shoreland Overlay Zoning Districts. Public Hearing Community Development Committee December 19, 2013

Storm Water Quality and Shoreline Restoration Improvements - Grant Funding Request City of Mound Carlson Park Bolton & Menk Project No.

Community LID Workgroup Issue Paper #6

Draft Rhode Island Stormwater Design and Installation Standards Manual

City of Shady Cove Riparian Ordinance Ordinance XXX

6Natural. Environment Development Permit Guidelines

STREAM BUFFER PROTECTION AND MANAGEMENT

Chapter 3 Site Planning and Low Impact Development

SENSITIVE LANDS OVERLAY

AMENDMENT NO. 30 TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE TOWN OF MILTON

Working Group Meeting

Minnesota Department of Natural Resource - Natural Resource Guidance Checklist Conserving Natural Resources through Density Bonuses

Appendix to Amicus Curiae Brief: Selected Provisions of the South Carolina Beachfront Management Act

PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD AGENDA OCTOBER

Fact Sheet Regulating Oceanfront Accessory Structures Updated June 10, 2013

STREAM BUFFERS

Prepared for: Central Coast Low Impact Development Initiative centralcoastlidi.org

17.18 SENSITIVE AREAS

ORDINANCE NO LC

CONSERVATION ELEMENT:

G. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT. The following summarizes the Recreation and Open Space Element:

CITY OF MERCER ISLAND CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA REGULAR MEETING

LEGAL & POLICY ANALYSIS TO SUPPORT RESILIENCE MEASURES. CEEL Tasks

CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

Hazard Mitigation Planning. Association of New Jersey Environmental Commissions Workshop Edison, New Jersey October 20, 2012

Green Infrastructure. NYS Department of Environmental Conservation

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: May 18, 2017

Kevin M. Rampe, President -- Lower Manhattan Development Corporation

GUIDELINES FOR ECOLOGICAL PERFORMANCE

Chesapeake Bay Critical Area Conservation Plan

Auke Bay Area Plan. Complete List of Goals and Policies for the Auke Bay Area Plan

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, a primary opportunity identified in the Plan is to Re-Connect the Uncompahgre River:

ORDINANCE NO

New Development Stormwater Guidelines

PARK CITY MUNICIPAL CODE TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE 15 LAND MANAGEMENT CODE - CHAPTER 2.21

I611. Swanson North Precinct

Options for addressing City of Edmonds Alternatives to Ecology s Required Changes addressing Edmonds Marsh Buffers and Setbacks.

V-5 TREE PROTECTION AND LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS

NJ Department of Environmental Protection

COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND SITTING AS THE DISTRICT COUNCIL 2010 Legislative Session. Council Members Dernoga and Olson

Importance of Master Planning Marcy Colclough

PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1800 Continental Place Mount Vernon, WA Inspections Office Fax

ARTICLE IV: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 404 MASTER PLANNING

River Corridor Overlay Zone (RCOZ) Article 5

State of the State New Jersey. Steve Jacobus NJDEP 06/10/15

WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON

COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT. Last amended December 6, 2016 as part of the 2016 EAR

Site Design (Table 2) Fact Sheet & Focus Questions:

Design Around Waterways and Wetlands

IMPLEMENTING STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR DEVELOPMENT

Venice Pumping Plant Dual Force Main Project Draft EIR

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CODES ANALYSIS RICHLAND COUNTY, SC SITE PLANNING ROUNDTABLE

CITY OF BLAINE SHORELINE MANAGEMENT MASTER PROGRAM

MUNICIPAL RESILIENCE PLANNING ASSISTANCE PROJECT

ADDENDUM TO BIOLOGICAL SCOPING SURVEY REPORT, BOTANICAL SURVEY AND WETLAND DELINEATION

MRCCA PRIMARY CONSERVATION AREAS

The Restoration of Reading Creek & Model Stream Buffer Ordinances/ Zoning Regulations for Alabama Streams

Landowner's Guide to the Lower St. Croix Riverway. Protect. Restore. Celebrate. stcroixriverassociation.org

APPENDIX C Township 9 Consistency with Applicable Plans

Town of Huntsville Official Plan Section 8 Waterfront Policies Page 71

PrairieWalk Pond Lisle, IL

Waterfront Redevelopment. City Council Briefing May 15, 2006

ARTICLE VII OVERLAY DISTRICTS AND AREAS

Josephine County, Oregon Board of Commissioners: Jim Riddle, Dwight F. Ellis, & Jim Raffenburg

FOR THE CITY OF MEDINA. No. SPR SUMMARY OF DECISION

CAO Update Status Work continues on products: Draft ordinance BAS report CAO process summary (2002 to present) Comprehensive e Plan policy review Some

Folly Beach Planning Commission

Transcription:

Advice from Department of Ecology The simplest way to reduce landslide risk is to avoid slideprone areas in the first place. Simple practices such as building a house farther from the edge of a steep slope, maintaining native vegetation above the slope, or inspecting drains annually are important.

City of Langley Bluff Seminar May 29, 2013

Issues

Issues Natural Process; Bluff erosion is an important ecological process

Issues Natural Process; Bluff erosion is an important ecological process Risk to people and property from development on the bluff;

Issues Natural Process; Bluff erosion is an important ecological process Risk to people and property from development on the bluff; Legal: Property Rights

Issues Natural Process; Bluff erosion is an important ecological process Risk to people and property from development on the bluff; Legal: Property Rights Environment + Habitat Conservation

Issues Natural Process; Bluff erosion is an important ecological process Risk to people and property from development on the bluff; Legal: Property Rights Environment + Habitat Conservation Economic Issues

Issues Natural Process; Bluff erosion is an important ecological process Risk to people and property from development on the bluff; Legal: Property Rights Environment + Habitat Conservation Economic Issues Political

Floodplain Management

Floodplain Management Flooding is a fundamental and beneficial natural process

Floodplain Management Flooding is a fundamental and beneficial natural process Risk to people and property from development in floodplains

Floodplain Management Flooding is a fundamental and beneficial natural process Risk to people and property from development in floodplains Regulations on new development only part of the answer; Mitigation of existing development may be more important

Floodplain Management Flooding is a fundamental and beneficial natural process Risk to people and property from development in floodplains Regulations on new development only part of the answer; Mitigation of existing development may be more important Property Rights;

Floodplain Management Flooding is a fundamental and beneficial natural process Risk to people and property from development in floodplains Regulations on new development only part of the answer; Mitigation of existing development may be more important Property Rights; Habitat Conservation

Floodplain Management Flooding is a fundamental and beneficial natural process Risk to people and property from development in floodplains Regulations on new development only part of the answer; Mitigation of existing development may be more important Property Rights; Habitat Conservation Economy

Floodplain Management Flooding is a fundamental and beneficial natural process Risk to people and property from development in floodplains Regulations on new development only part of the answer; Mitigation of existing development may be more important Property Rights; Habitat Conservation Economy National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) - Development Subsidy; Violates Endangered Species Act

Shoreline Management Act

Shoreline Management Act Passed by Legislature in 1971 and Voters in 1972

Shoreline Management Act Passed by Legislature in 1971 and Voters in 1972 Regulates Development from 200 Upland to Middle of Water Body

Shoreline Management Act Passed by Legislature in 1971 and Voters in 1972 Regulates Development from 200 Upland to Middle of Water Body Single Family Residential a Preferred Use

Shoreline Management Act Passed by Legislature in 1971 and Voters in 1972 Regulates Development from 200 Upland to Middle of Water Body Single Family Residential a Preferred Use Bulkheads to Protect Single Family Homes an Exempt Activity

Shoreline Management Act Passed by Legislature in 1971 and Voters in 1972 Regulates Development from 200 Upland to Middle of Water Body Single Family Residential a Preferred Use Bulkheads to Protect Single Family Homes an Exempt Activity Water Dependent, Water-Related and Water- Enjoyment Uses

Shoreline Management Act Passed by Legislature in 1971 and Voters in 1972 Regulates Development from 200 Upland to Middle of Water Body Single Family Residential a Preferred Use Bulkheads to Protect Single Family Homes an Exempt Activity Water Dependent, Water-Related and Water- Enjoyment Uses Strong Support for Public Access

Langley s

Langley s Last Updated 2001

Langley s Last Updated 2001 2013 Updated Locally Adopted on May 6, 2013

Langley s Last Updated 2001 2013 Updated Locally Adopted on May 6, 2013 Development Standards Adjacent to Bluffs Buffers and Setbacks Vegetation Preservation and Restoration Stormwater Management

Coastal Zone Atlas

Legend Update - 2012 Shoreline Environment Designations Shoreline Properties Reaches Langley Central Aquatic Conservancy Langley East Shoreline Residential Langley West Aquatic Urban Urban Aquatic Boat Harbor Aquatic Conservancy Shoreline Residential Shoreline Residential - UGA I Aquatic Conservancy - UGA

Buffers + Setbacks 50 Buffer from Top and Toe of Slope 15 Building Setback from Top or Toe of Slope

Langley West Saratoga Passage Langley Central Sara t oga C r eek Dock (Industrial Use) Dock (Derelict - To be removed with marina expansion) Marina Wood Bulkhead Rotting (30 ft Offset) Broo k h av Noble Cr eek City of Langley: Update Figure 5 Vegetation Coverage and Distance from Bluff Legend This map is intended for planning purposes only. Inaccuracies may exis t. This map depicts the approximate location and extent of areas subjec t to the City of Langley SMP. The actual extent of the s horeline planning area requires a site-specific evaluation to identify the location of the ordinary high water mark and any ass oc iated wetlands. SO URCE: City of Langley, 2011; Island County, 2010; PSNERP, 2010; WDNR, 2006. Department of Ecology Grant G1100124/Task 2.3 15ft setback Eastimated Buffer Vegetation Coverage ( Distance from Top of Bluff 50ft Buffer 0-5% 10-50 Top of Slope 6-25% 51-75 Reaches 26-75% 76-100 76-100% 101 + Feet 0 425 850 S:\GIS\Projects\211xxx\211142 Langley SMP\mxd\working\Shoreline Analysis AC.mxd (AWC; 10/5/2012) en C r eek Langley East

Langley West Saratoga Passage Langley Central Sara t oga C r eek Dock (Industrial Use) Dock (Derelict - To be removed with marina expansion) Marina Wood Bulkhead Rotting (30 ft Offset) Broo k h av Noble Cr eek City of Langley: Update Figure 5 Vegetation Coverage and Distance from Bluff Legend This map is intended for planning purposes only. Inaccuracies may exis t. This map depicts the approximate location and extent of areas subjec t to the City of Langley SMP. The actual extent of the s horeline planning area requires a site-specific evaluation to identify the location of the ordinary high water mark and any ass oc iated wetlands. SO URCE: City of Langley, 2011; Island County, 2010; PSNERP, 2010; WDNR, 2006. Department of Ecology Grant G1100124/Task 2.3 15ft setback Eastimated Buffer Vegetation Coverage ( Distance from Top of Bluff 50ft Buffer 0-5% 10-50 Top of Slope 6-25% 51-75 Reaches 26-75% 76-100 76-100% 101 + Feet 0 425 850 S:\GIS\Projects\211xxx\211142 Langley SMP\mxd\working\Shoreline Analysis AC.mxd (AWC; 10/5/2012) en C r eek Langley East

Langley West Saratoga Passage Langley Central Sara t oga C r eek Dock (Industrial Use) Dock (Derelict - To be removed with marina expansion) Marina Wood Bulkhead Rotting (30 ft Offset) Broo k h av Noble Cr eek City of Langley: Update Figure 5 Vegetation Coverage and Distance from Bluff Legend This map is intended for planning purposes only. Inaccuracies may exis t. This map depicts the approximate location and extent of areas subjec t to the City of Langley SMP. The actual extent of the s horeline planning area requires a site-specific evaluation to identify the location of the ordinary high water mark and any ass oc iated wetlands. SO URCE: City of Langley, 2011; Island County, 2010; PSNERP, 2010; WDNR, 2006. Department of Ecology Grant G1100124/Task 2.3 15ft setback Eastimated Buffer Vegetation Coverage ( Distance from Top of Bluff 50ft Buffer 0-5% 10-50 Top of Slope 6-25% 51-75 Reaches 26-75% 76-100 76-100% 101 + Feet 0 425 850 S:\GIS\Projects\211xxx\211142 Langley SMP\mxd\working\Shoreline Analysis AC.mxd (AWC; 10/5/2012) en C r eek Langley East

Landscaping

Landscaping All lots shall be generously landscaped, and consistent with the natural environment of Langley and appropriate to the planned use. Retention of natural landscaping is encouraged. (Ord. 527, 1989)

Native Vegetation

Native Vegetation Removal of native vegetation shall be avoided, where feasible. Where removal of native vegetation cannot be avoided, it shall be minimized to protect ecological functions. If non-native vegetation is to be removed, then it shall be replaced with native vegetation within the shoreline jurisdiction. Bulkheads: Nonstructural measures, such as placing the development further from the shoreline, planting vegetation, or installing on-site drainage improvements, are not feasible or not sufficient;

Native Vegetation Removal of native vegetation shall be avoided, where feasible. Where removal of native vegetation cannot be avoided, it shall be minimized to protect ecological functions. If non-native vegetation is to be removed, then it shall be replaced with native vegetation within the shoreline jurisdiction. Bulkheads: Nonstructural measures, such as placing the development further from the shoreline, planting vegetation, or installing on-site drainage improvements, are not feasible or not sufficient;

Native Vegetation Removal of native vegetation shall be avoided, where feasible. Where removal of native vegetation cannot be avoided, it shall be minimized to protect ecological functions. If non-native vegetation is to be removed, then it shall be replaced with native vegetation within the shoreline jurisdiction. Bulkheads: Nonstructural measures, such as placing the development further from the shoreline, planting vegetation, or installing on-site drainage improvements, are not feasible or not sufficient;

Native Vegetation Removal of native vegetation shall be avoided, where feasible. Where removal of native vegetation cannot be avoided, it shall be minimized to protect ecological functions. If non-native vegetation is to be removed, then it shall be replaced with native vegetation within the shoreline jurisdiction. Bulkheads: Nonstructural measures, such as placing the development further from the shoreline, planting vegetation, or installing on-site drainage improvements, are not feasible or not sufficient;

Native Vegetation Removal of native vegetation shall be avoided, where feasible. Where removal of native vegetation cannot be avoided, it shall be minimized to protect ecological functions. If non-native vegetation is to be removed, then it shall be replaced with native vegetation within the shoreline jurisdiction. Bulkheads: Nonstructural measures, such as placing the development further from the shoreline, planting vegetation, or installing on-site drainage improvements, are not feasible or not sufficient;

Langley West Saratoga Passage Langley Central Sara t oga C r eek Dock (Industrial Use) Dock (Derelict - To be removed with marina expansion) Marina Wood Bulkhead Rotting (30 ft Offset) Broo k h av Noble Cr eek City of Langley: Update Figure 5 Vegetation Coverage and Distance from Bluff Legend This map is intended for planning purposes only. Inaccuracies may exis t. This map depicts the approximate location and extent of areas subjec t to the City of Langley SMP. The actual extent of the s horeline planning area requires a site-specific evaluation to identify the location of the ordinary high water mark and any ass oc iated wetlands. SO URCE: City of Langley, 2011; Island County, 2010; PSNERP, 2010; WDNR, 2006. Department of Ecology Grant G1100124/Task 2.3 15ft setback Eastimated Buffer Vegetation Coverage ( Distance from Top of Bluff 50ft Buffer 0-5% 10-50 Top of Slope 6-25% 51-75 Reaches 26-75% 76-100 76-100% 101 + Feet 0 425 850 S:\GIS\Projects\211xxx\211142 Langley SMP\mxd\working\Shoreline Analysis AC.mxd (AWC; 10/5/2012) en C r eek Langley East

Langley West Saratoga Passage Langley Central Sara t oga C r eek Dock (Industrial Use) Dock (Derelict - To be removed with marina expansion) Marina Wood Bulkhead Rotting (30 ft Offset) Broo k h av Noble Cr eek City of Langley: Update Figure 5 Vegetation Coverage and Distance from Bluff Legend This map is intended for planning purposes only. Inaccuracies may exis t. This map depicts the approximate location and extent of areas subjec t to the City of Langley SMP. The actual extent of the s horeline planning area requires a site-specific evaluation to identify the location of the ordinary high water mark and any ass oc iated wetlands. SO URCE: City of Langley, 2011; Island County, 2010; PSNERP, 2010; WDNR, 2006. Department of Ecology Grant G1100124/Task 2.3 15ft setback Eastimated Buffer Vegetation Coverage ( Distance from Top of Bluff 50ft Buffer 0-5% 10-50 Top of Slope 6-25% 51-75 Reaches 26-75% 76-100 76-100% 101 + Feet 0 425 850 S:\GIS\Projects\211xxx\211142 Langley SMP\mxd\working\Shoreline Analysis AC.mxd (AWC; 10/5/2012) en C r eek Langley East

Langley West Saratoga Passage Langley Central Sara t oga C r eek Dock (Industrial Use) Dock (Derelict - To be removed with marina expansion) Marina Wood Bulkhead Rotting (30 ft Offset) Broo k h av Noble Cr eek City of Langley: Update Figure 5 Vegetation Coverage and Distance from Bluff Legend This map is intended for planning purposes only. Inaccuracies may exis t. This map depicts the approximate location and extent of areas subjec t to the City of Langley SMP. The actual extent of the s horeline planning area requires a site-specific evaluation to identify the location of the ordinary high water mark and any ass oc iated wetlands. SO URCE: City of Langley, 2011; Island County, 2010; PSNERP, 2010; WDNR, 2006. Department of Ecology Grant G1100124/Task 2.3 15ft setback Eastimated Buffer Vegetation Coverage ( Distance from Top of Bluff 50ft Buffer 0-5% 10-50 Top of Slope 6-25% 51-75 Reaches 26-75% 76-100 76-100% 101 + Feet 0 425 850 S:\GIS\Projects\211xxx\211142 Langley SMP\mxd\working\Shoreline Analysis AC.mxd (AWC; 10/5/2012) en C r eek Langley East

Detailed Drainage Plans Detailed drainage plans are not required for single-family or duplex development or redevelopment that includes the creation of less than 5,000 square feet of impervious surface area.

SMP Drainage Plan Requirement New residential construction and additions to residential structures that increase net impervious surface by 200 feet or more shall be required to provide a detailed drainage plan as part of any permit application.

Recap Don t build too close to the bluff Retain and Restore Native Vegetation Stormwater Management

Edgecliff 1992

Edgecliff 2001

Edgecliff 2006

1992 2001

1992 2001

1992 2001

Bluff Information Greenbelt Consulting: www.greenbeltconsulting.com designlangley: www.designlangley.org Department of Ecology Website: ww.ecy.wa.gov http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/landslides/ index.html