CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF THE STATE FIRE MARSHAL

Similar documents
Draft Document. A 15 Year Update on the Impact and Effectiveness of the Scottsdale Sprinkler Ordinance

REQUIREMENTS. For FIRE DEPARTMENTS. State of West Virginia. Bob Wise Governor THE DEPARTMENT OF MILITARY AFFAIRS AND PUBLIC SAFETY

JAMES F. McMULLEN CURRICULUM VITAE

BENEFITS of RESIDENTIAL FIRE SPRINKLERS:

STUDY ISSUE PAPER ON THE RESIDENTIAL SPRINKLER ORDINANCE

PRESENTERS OVERVIEW COMMUNITY WORKSHOP OVERVIEW OF THE 2010 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS CODE AND LOCAL AMENDMENTS

S 2758 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

STAFF REPORT SAUSALITO CITY COUNCIL

Establishing the Risk Basis of Building Size Limits

Colorado Division of Fire Prevention & Control, Fire & Life Safety Section

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation March 25, 2004 LOS ANGELES GREEN VISION PLAN. File No.: Project Manager: Marc Beyeler

Single Room Occupancy Hotel Safety & Stabilization Task Force

Bruce E. Johnson Underwriters Laboratories 395 Kingston Drive Ridge, New York Phone: (631)

MONTGOMERY COUNTY ARCHIVES. Guide to the Printed Material of RECORD GROUP 7: PUBLIC SAFETY , 2001

INTRODUCTION. 1.1 What is a General Plan? 1.2 Requirements for a General Plan. 1.3 Introduction to Monterey County

PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY FIRE AND RESCUE ASSOCIATION RESOLUTION LOG

CURRICULUM VITAE. James F. McMullen, MPA, CFFI Fire Protection and Life-Safety Consultant

ORDINANCE NO. Establishing Fire and Life Safety Requirements for Existing Multi-Family Residential Buildings Classified as Group R, Division Occupancy

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS

FIREFIGHTING RESOURCES OF CALIFORNIA ORGANIZED FOR POTENTIAL EMERGENCIES

GATEWAY BUILDING ELEVATOR AND ESCALATOR SERVICES

VILLAGE OF DOWNERS GROVE Report for the Village Council Meeting

CAC OVERVIEW. CAC Roles and Responsibilities CAC Operations CAC Membership CAC DAC Relations

Planning Commission Report

Understanding and Managing Fire Safety in Housing Accommodation

SECTION REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS. A. Relationship between Code, Ordinances, Standards and Contract Documents

- Residential Fire Sprinkler -

FIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION*

Bold items are particular to the City of Euless

International Water Mist Conference, Istanbul October 22-23, 2014 The background and development of the guidelines in IMO Resolution A.

master plan of highways bus rapid transit amendment

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT of FORESTRY and FIRE PROTECTION OFFICE OF THE STATE FIRE MARSHAL UL 300

Performance and Cost Data. fire services

Water Purveyor s Guide to 2006 Fire Sprinklers in Single Family Dwellings

ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL State of Washington 60th Legislature 2007 Regular Session

ADOPTION OF THE REVISED OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN

HEALTH, ENVIRONMENT AND SAFETY MANAGEMENT FOR FACILITIES MANAGERS COURSE OUTLINE

Planning and Growth Management Committee

Nightclub Fires in 2000

Table EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE a OCCUPANCY SYSTEM SYSTEM. A, E, F-1, I-1, M, b,d R, S-1. B c. F-2, S-2, U c

Health Chapter ALABAMA STATE BOARD OF HEALTH ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH ADMINISTRATIVE CODE

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Standard Operating Procedures

RESIDENTIAL CODE MANUAL COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION Based on the 2017 LACRC

Report: Summary of Building Codes Division Process, Residential Fire Sprinklers December 2008

NFPA Fire Inspector I Study Guide

District of Sicamous. Fire Department Bylaw No. 126, Effective Date February 26, 1996

Fire Safety Policy. Document Author: Director of Estates, Fleet & Facilities Management

Project phasing plan (if applicable) 12 copies of site plan

Home Fires Involving Heating Equipment

FIRE PREVENTION OFFICE Placer Hills Fire Protection District NEW PROJECT GUIDELINES

OC DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT. Public Hearing Proposed Zoning Code Amendment CA County of Orange Landscape Irrigation Code

Minutes of Meeting. FIRE SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE to the OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES. Sacramento Inn Sacramento, California.

STATE FIRE MARSHAL S REQUIRED FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS NARRATIVE REPORT

NOTTINGHAM CITY HOMES

FIRE & LIFE SAFTEY STANDARD

CITY OF SIMI VALLEY MEMORANDUM

REPORT TO COUNCIL City of Sacramento

DEALING WITH FIRE SAFETY

Fire Safety and Arson Prevention

REVISION RECORD FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SUPPLEMENT

Construction Codes Advisory Council

MEMORANDUM. TERESA McCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR

This regulation outlines procedures to be followed for fire drills and all school event decorations.

Community Development and Recreation Committee

2018 Annual Fire Safety Report

Category V. NOTE: Fire Investigations are covered in Criterion 5D.

SC # /16/17/18/19/23/24 D#03-24

CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS ORDINANCE NO. 12, 2002

The Cannabis Industry: Fire Department Requirements

Reported Fires in High-Rise Structures in Selected Occupancies with and without Automatic Extinguishing Systems by Extent of Smoke Damage

FIRE SAFETY POLICY. Approval Approved by: University Court Date: March 28 th 2017

FIRE SAFETY POLICY June 2014

Iowa s Statewide Urban Design Standards Promote Improved Access Management

FIRE INSPECTION GUIDELINES FOR FOSTER GROUP HOME PARENTS Effective June 1, 2002, Update September 2011

Fire Flow Requirements Standard

Maintaining Building and Fire Safety During Active Assailant Events and Other Terrorist Events

Safety Inspector III Class Description

PROPOSED CHANGE TO THE 2007 FIRE CODE (OFC)

BUILDING CODE COMMISSION

BYLAW 5542 *******************************************************************************

FIRE SAFETY MANAGEMENT PLAN

Thomasville fire rescue

Open to Below: A Discussion of Allowed Floor Openings. Jay A. Ierardi, Ph.D., P.E., LEED AP. Kevin S. Hastings, P.E., LEED AP

H BUTCH BROWNING FIRE MARSHAL BUILDING REHABILITATION

Potential Savings of Tax Dollars

New School Construction: Safe School Opening. OAR and IOR Joint Training February 17, 2005

Standard Development Timeline

Amend Base Code. Amend Base Code. Amend Base Code. Disposition. (Statute, Rule, FBC, Industry) Y/N

Jeffrey A. Meston

Fire Flow Requirements Standard

THE NATIONAL CODE SERVICES ASSOCIATION (NCSA)

Town of Whitby By-law #

HOME FIRES THAT BEGAN WITH UPHOLSTERED FURNITURE

Fire Sprinklers Working Group Final Report

SANTA CLARA COUNTY Winchester Blvd., Los Gatos, CA (408) (408) (fax)

LA GRANGE FIRE DEPARTMENT OCTOBER 2017

CHANGES TO THE TEXT OF THE 2010 CODE BOOKS

Pismo Beach, CA Municipal Code. Chapter 8.08 FIRE PREVENTION REGULATIONS

Professional Publications and Presentations Published and Presented by Jack Poole, PE, Principal

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Standard Operating Procedures

Transcription:

CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF THE STATE FIRE MARSHAL THE HISTORY OF RESIDENTIAL FIRE SPRINKLERS IN CALIFORNIA Fire sprinklers are not a new concept. The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) cites the first automatic fire extinguishing system was patented in England in 1723 and around 1852 the first form of a sprinkler system was introduced into the United States. In 1874 the first practical automatic sprinkler was patented by Henry S. Parmelee of New Haven, Connecticut. Since the late 1800s fire sprinkler systems have been used to protect structures and contents from the devastation of fire. As early as 1932 residential fire sprinkler systems were on the horizon with the Grinnell Company advertising one of the first residential fire sprinkler systems. In a brochure developed by Grinnell, they publicized the effectiveness of these junior sprinkler systems and installed them in single family dwellings provided by the Union Oil Company to house their employees working the oil fields in Santa Paula, California. So began the California residential fire sprinkler history. The residential fire sprinkler systems grew strong roots in California. starting with the 1970-71 California State Fire Marshal s (SFM) Office involvement in testing the application of plastic piping for residential use, the first quick response sprinkler head prototype tested in Southern California in 1978, and the Senate Concurrent Resolution # 23 (filed July 23, 1979) requesting the SFM to develop a set of voluntary standards for one- and two-family dwellings and provide a report to the Legislature by December 31, 1980. The push for life safety took an even stronger stand when Fire Chief Ronny J. Coleman was successful in establishing a residential fire sprinkler ordinance for the City of San Clemente. This ordinance requiring residential fire sprinklers to be installed in all new dwellings was the first in the nation. Since those early years, California has taken the lead in the development and adoption of local ordinances requiring residential fire sprinklers. These ordinances recognize the importance of this life saving system in combating fire early, providing the necessary time for occupants to evacuate the structure, and reducing the dangers to firefighters in residential fires. The following historical information provides a brief overview of the development and implementation of residential fire sprinklers; and illustrates California s continued efforts in providing a safer environment for our visitors, citizens, and emergency responders. The History Of Residential Fire Sprinklers In California 1 of 6 November 1, 2011

(1874) The development of a new technology the automatic fire sprinkler system began in the late 1800s to address the significant fire problems involving the textile industry in the United States. Henry S. Parmelee, owner of a piano factory in New Haven, Connecticut, invented the first practical automatic fire sprinkler in 1874. For nearly 100-years new fire-fighting technology was focused on the industrial and commercial sector of this nation s fire problem. (1896) The National Board of Fire Underwriters (NBFU) originally published Rules and Regulations of the NBFU for Sprinkler Equipments, Automatic and Open Systems ; however, in 1896 the National Fire Protection Association first published NFPA-13 Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems. (1932) The Grinnell Company advertised one of the first residential fire sprinkler systems (Junior Sprinkler System) in a brochure dated October 1932 in which they discuss the loss of life and property in residences. Several of these systems were fabricated and installed in single-family dwellings in Santa Paula, California under the direction of the Union Oil Company who constructed houses for their employees working in the oil fields. (1960) The fire problem was further complicated by the lack of a nationwide fire data collection system. Therefore, the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) proposed a standard fire reporting system called the Uniform Fire Incident Reporting System (UFIRS). The UFIRS system was a voluntary documenting system; however, several large metropolitan area fire departments began to compile fire data. This and other reporting efforts began to paint the fire picture in America, and revealed that dwelling fires were the predominant factor in loss of life. (1972) The document AMERICA BURNING The Report of The National Commission on Fire Prevention and Control identified and recommended that the U.S. Fire Administration support the development of the necessary technology for improved automatic extinguishing systems that would find ready acceptance by Americans in all kinds of dwelling units. (1972-1975) Like many other ideas whose time had come, putting automatic fire sprinklers to use in residential occupancies was moving beyond the conceptual stage and into application. As early as 1970-71, experiments were conducted with plastic pipe for residential sprinklers by Robert Shaw of the California State Fire Training Program, and Don Shaw of the City of Palo Alto (California) Fire Department. They published their results in 1972. In 1975, the City of San Clemente (California) Fire Department - Fire Chief Ronny J. Coleman, also began to experiment with plastic pipe and conventional fire sprinkler technology; as did Fire Chief David Hilton of Cobb County, Georgia. (1975) During this time, approximately 50% of the total loss of life in residential occupancies was due to fire. Recognizing the need to reduce the annual life loss from fire in residential occupancies, the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Committee on Automatic Sprinklers appointed a subcommittee in May 1973 to prepare the Standard for the installation of sprinklers in one- and two-family dwellings and mobile homes. The Standard for residential fire sprinklers in one- and two-family dwellings (NFPA-13D) was submitted and adopted at the NFPA Annual Meeting in Chicago, Illinois, on May 12-16, 1975. (1978) The first residential fire sprinkler was developed by Central Sprinkler Corporation, through the combined efforts of Bill Meyers, George Meyers, and Kathy Vernot as well as Harry Shaw, Acting Administrator US Fire Administration (USFA). Their OMEGA residential sprinkler quickly became the technology leader, with other manufacturers such as Grinnell moving quickly to capture a portion of the market. The History Of Residential Fire Sprinklers In California 2 of 6 November 1, 2011

(1978) The first quick-response prototype sprinkler systems were tested in Marina Del Rey, California between June 1978 and June 1979 with the cooperation and assistance of the Los Angeles City Fire Department under the supervision of then Division Chief Donald Manning. The National Fire Protection Association and Factory Mutual were active participates in these tests, sponsored by the U.S. Fire Administration who assisted in the funding of these tests. The Technical Report (FMRC J.I. OEORR3A.1) entitled Field Evaluation of Residential Prototype Sprinklers Los Angeles Fire Test Program was published in February 1982. (1979) State Senator William Campbell, Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Fire Services (33 rd District, Los Angeles), authored Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 23 Home Fire Sprinkler Systems filed with Secretary of State July 23, 1979, which requested the State Fire Marshal to develop a set of suggested voluntary standards for the design, installation, and maintenance of automatic fire sprinkler systems for one- and two-family dwellings, and to report thereon to the Legislature on or before December 31, 1980. (1979) Under the leadership of then Fire Chief, Ronny J. Coleman, the City of San Clemente, California, adopted the first fire sprinkler ordinance in the nation to require automatic residential fire sprinkler systems in all newly constructed one- and two-family dwellings built in the City of San Clemente. The philosophy presented by Chief Coleman to the City Council was: to apply water so as to confine the blaze to the room of origin during the first 10-minutes of the fire s growth and development, and to keep temperatures low enough to prevent flashover. (1982) In January 1982 California State Fire Marshal Philip C. Favro (in conjunction with Fire Protection Engineer Joseph S. Sacco, P.E.) published the document California Voluntary Standards for Residential Sprinkler Systems Design Installation - Maintenance after months of research by Subject Matter Experts (Fire Service, Fire Sprinkler Industry, United States Fire Administration (USFA), National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), California Fire Chiefs Association (CalChiefs) Northern/Southern Fire Prevention Officers Sections, California Public Utilities Commission, California Department of Health Services, and California Department of Corporations). The Voluntary Standards described the minimum design, installation and maintenance criteria of a low cost automatic fire sprinkler systems, which, when used in conjunction with smoke detectors, is intended to reduce life loss and property damage in one- and twofamily dwellings. (1984) In late 1984 the first Fire Sprinkler Ordinance Survey was completed by the City of Monterey Fire Department (California) in conjunction with the National Fire Sprinkler Association. The State population was 17.4-million. The survey results showed that one hundred sixty two (162) jurisdictions responded, which reflected approximately 82% of the states population. Of those who responded forty-eight (48) indicated that they required residential occupancies to be sprinklered; however, the question did not break down the different occupancy classifications (one- and two-family dwellings, apartments, condominiums, and townhouses). This is roughly 29.6% of those jurisdictions who responded to the survey. (1985) State Assembly Member Frank C. Hill (52 nd District Los Angeles) authored House Resolution No. 7 which resolved: That the State Fire Marshal and the State Board of Fire Services are requested to study the feasibility of requiring the installation of fire sprinkler systems in all buildings hereafter constructed for human occupancy, and report the results of that study to the Legislature on or before January 1, 1986. The History Of Residential Fire Sprinklers In California 3 of 6 November 1, 2011

(1985-1986) In the 1985/86 Session of the California Legislature Senate Bill No. 2579 was introduced to require the installation of automatic fire sprinkler systems in all buildings and structures intended for residential occupancy constructed on or after January 1, 1987. This Bill authored by Herschel Rosenthal (22 nd District Los Angeles), failed to pass the Fire Committee and was therefore defeated. (1986) On March 31, 1986 the California State Fire Marshal and the State Board of Fire Services issued a Report to the Legislature in response to House Resolution No. 7, entitled: An Analysis of the Feasibility of Requiring the Installation of Fire Sprinkler Systems in all Buildings Constructed for Human Occupancy. The concluding statement in the summary of the Report stated: Until local communities educate the public on the benefits and economics of residential sprinkler systems there will be little support in mandating the use of those systems. (1986) On September 29, 1986 the State Fire Marshal Advisory Committee on Residential Sprinkler Systems was given a draft copy of a new Underwriters Laboratories Standard: UL-1626 First Edition (Residential Sprinklers for Fire-Protection Service - dated May 19, 1986) and asked for comment to utilize the draft standard. This draft was utilized by the Committee in the development of a California State Fire Marshal Residential Sprinkler Standard. (1987) On August 12, 1987 Deputy Director Edward F. Seits distributed a Draft copy of the Residential Sprinkler Standard and the report from the Tradeoffs Subcommittee to the Members of the California State Fire Marshal Residential Sprinkler Systems Advisory Committee for review and comment. Following the review, the document was to go to California State Fire Marshal James F. McMullen for approval. (1988) In January 1988 the California State Fire Marshal published the document Recommended Residential Sprinkler Standard One- and Two-Family Dwellings after months of research by the State Fire Marshal Residential Sprinkler Advisory Committee. This recommended standard described the minimum design, installation and maintenance criteria of a low cost automatic fire sprinkler system, which, when used in conjunction with smoke detectors, is intended to reduce life loss and property damage in one- and twofamily dwellings. (1988) A new test standard, UL-1626, First Edition (Residential Sprinklers for Fire-Protection Service), was developed by Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. to evaluate a residential sprinkler. The new standard incorporated criteria such as: 1) maximum of two sprinklers operating during the test, 2) Response Time Index (RTI), 3) Required Delivered Density (RDD), and 4) Actual Delivered Density (ADD). (1989) On September 15, 1989 an Executive Summary Report on the 1989 Fire Sprinkler Ordinance Survey was issued by the Fire Sprinkler Advisory Board of Southern California (FSABSC), which reflected roughly 89% of the State population (the 254 surveys received represented 23.5-million people). The survey results showed that one hundred thirty one (131) jurisdictions required residential occupancies to be sprinklered; however, the question did not break down the different occupancy classifications (one- and two-family dwellings, apartments, condominiums, and townhouses). This is roughly 57.2% of those jurisdictions who responded to the survey. The History Of Residential Fire Sprinklers In California 4 of 6 November 1, 2011

(1989) In June 1989 the California State Fire Marshal published the document California Voluntary Supplement NFPA-13D (1989) Residential Sprinkler Standard One- and Two-Family Dwellings, which revised the previous publication. This document was a supplement to the NFPA-13D, 1989 edition and was intended to serve as a model for California local jurisdictions, especially those that require residential occupancies to be sprinklered. It was designed to address the residential fire protection problems that are common throughout the State. (1993) On May 31, 1993 An Executive Summary Report on the 1993 Fire Sprinkler Ordinance Survey was issued by the Fire Sprinkler Advisory Board of Southern California which reflected roughly 87.5% of the State population (the 274 surveys received represented 26.7-million of the estimated 30.5-million population). The survey results showed that seventy-six (76) jurisdictions required ALL newly constructed single-family dwellings to be equipped with automatic residential fire sprinkler systems. This is roughly 29.4% of those jurisdictions who responded to the survey. (1995) In May 1995 California State Fire Marshal Ronny J. Coleman published a document Design Alternatives Relevant to One- and Two-Family Residential Fire Sprinklers for the purpose of identifying guidelines to encourage the installation of residential fire sprinklers in a cost-effective manner, thus providing an improved level of protection to the occupant(s), community, and firefighter(s). (1995) The International Association of Fire Chiefs (IAFC) Operation Life Safety (OLS) received a United States Fire Administration (USFA) contract with the goal of gaining acceptance of the building code for fire sprinkler requirements for one- and two-family homes. (2003) On September 1, 2003 an Executive Summary Report on the 2003 Fire Sprinkler Ordinance Survey was issued by the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Promotion Fund (NAS-IP), which reflected roughly 65.8% of the State population (the 215 surveys received represented 23.1-million of the estimated 35.1- million population). The survey results showed that sixty-four (64) jurisdictions required ALL newly constructed single-family dwellings to be equipped with automatic residential fire sprinkler systems. This is roughly 31.8% of those jurisdictions who responded to the survey. (2004) On September 20, 2004 a Resolution by the California Fire Chiefs Association, jointly endorsed by the Executive Boards of the Northern and Southern Divisions of the Fire Prevention Officers Section, resolved that the California Fire Chiefs Association, fully endorses the utilization of, and encourages the installation of Residential Fire Sprinkler Systems in residential properties in accordance with NFPA-13R and -13D. (2006) The 2006 International Residential Code (ICC/IRC) contained a provision in Appendix P which stated: AP101 Fire sprinklers. An approved automatic fire sprinkler system shall be in new one- and two-family dwellings and townhouses in accordance with Section 903.3.1 of the International Building Code (ICC/IBC). The provisions contained in the appendix are not mandatory unless specifically referenced in the adopting ordinance. (Note: Due to time and workload constraints, the 2006 ICC/IRC was not moved forward as a State of California Building Standard.) (2007) During the review and adoption of the 2007 California Building Code/Fire Code (based on the 2006 IBC/IFC) the provisions defined in Section 903.2.7 were amended to read: Group R. An automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3 shall be provided throughout all buildings with a Group R fire area. Exceptions: 1. Detached one- and two-family dwellings (town houses) not more than three stories above grade plane in height with a separate means of egress, unless specifically required by other sections of this code or classified as Group R-4. The History Of Residential Fire Sprinklers In California 5 of 6 November 1, 2011

(2008-2010) As a result of the California State Fire Marshal Residential Fire Sprinkler Task Force (Phase I Water Purveyor [10/09/08 thru 03/30/09], Phase II Installation [04/06/09 thru 05/21/09], and Phase III Training and Education [07/21/09 thru 03/17/10]) Meetings and Final Report Documents, Division Chief Kevin Reinertson, CAL-FIRE Office of the State Fire Marshal, Code Development and Analysis Division, Regional Manager (West) Bruce Lecair, National Fire Sprinkler Association (NSFA), and Consultant Steve Hart, National Automatic Sprinkler Industry developed a 4-hour Awareness Level Course which would be delivered in twenty-four cities throughout the State to targeted stakeholders who would be expected to be impacted by the new residential fire sprinkler regulations as of January 1, 2011. (2010) From June 1 thru November 22 the California State Fire Marshal Code Development and Analysis Division coordinated and presented twenty-four Residential Fire Sprinkler Awareness Level Classes (4- hours in length) throughout the State presenting an overview of the California Residential Code fire sprinkler provisions to well over 1,200 stakeholders (Building Departments, Fire Agencies, Water Purveyors, Architects, Professional Engineers, Homebuilder Contractors, Fire Protection Contractors, Plumbing Contractors, and other interested persons). (2010) By December 2010 the number of communities in California which required a residential fire sprinkler system in All newly constructed one- and two-family dwellings had reached approximately one hundred sixty prior to statewide application. The NFPA Fire Sprinkler Initiative website (http://www.nfpa.org/fsimap/index.php?p =search& state=ca) identified one hundred fifty three. (2011) The California Building Standards Commission approved and adopted the 2010 California Residential Code (California Code of Regulations, Title-24, Part 2.5) based on the 2009 edition of the International Residential Code (published by the International Coe Council) with an effective date of January 1, 2011. The provisions of Sections R313.1 (Townhouse) and R313.2 (One- and two-family dwellings) reads: An automatic residential fire sprinkler system shall be installed in townhouses and in one- and two-family dwellings respectively. The History Of Residential Fire Sprinklers In California 6 of 6 November 1, 2011