Environmental Assessment for a New Landfill Footprint at the West Carleton Environmental Centre

Similar documents
Revised License Report

Environmental Assessment for a New Landfill Footprint at the West Carleton Environmental Centre

ARCHEOWORKS INC. Project Number: Licence/CIF#: P June 2006

STAGE 1 2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF YONGE STREET SUBWAY EXTENSION, LOTS 37-41, CONCESSION EYS, TOWNSHIP OF MARKHAM, CITY OF TORONTO, YORK COUNTY

Appendix I. Stage 2 Archaeological Assessment Report

Original License Report. Submitted to: New Horizon Development Inc. 69 John Street South, Suite 304 Hamilton, Ontario L8N 2B9 Phone (905)

Detritus Consulting Ltd.

STAGE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF RATHBURN ROAD, FROM DUKE OF YORK BOULEVARD TO SHIPP DRIVE, CITY OF MISSISSAUGA. Submitted to:

APPENDIX 'D' Archaeological Investigation

Ministère du Tourisme, de la Culture et du Sport

STAGE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE MISSISSAUGA BRT (EAST), CITY OF MISSISSAUGA. Submitted to:

1.0 PROJECT REPORT COVER PAGE

Submitted: July 23, 2009

APPENDIX H. Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment

Appendix E Study Area Archaeological Assessment

THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK BYLAW NO A bylaw to adopt Amendment No. 6 to the Official Plan for The Regional Municipality of York

Cultural Heritage Resources

APPENDIX E ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION

ARCHEOWORKS INC. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

A. M. Archaeological Associates

TOWN OF AURORA HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS AND CONSERVATION PLANS GUIDE

ORIGINAL REPORT: STAGE 1 & 2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT PART OF LOT 9, CONCESSION 4, COUNTY OF WELLINGTON, NOW IN 233 JANEFIELD AVENUE, GUELPH, ONTARIO

Submitted to. Armel Corporation Suite Spectrum Way, Mississauga, Ontario L4W 5N5 Telephone: Facsimile:

Ministère du Tourisme, de la Culture et du Sport

F2. Draft Archaeological and Cultural Heritage Net Effects Analysis & Comparative Evaluation Report

Ivol Buildings, Woodcote Road, South Stoke, Oxfordshire

MONITORING STRATEGY. CRM Lab Archaeological Services

Phase One Archaeological Investigation Results, James Madison Park Master Development Plan Project, City of Madison, Dane County, Wisconsin

Chapter 6 cultural heritage

AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY FOR THE RICHARDS, TEXAS FARM-TO-MARKET ROAD 149 FIBER OPTIC CABLE PROJECT IN MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS

AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY FOR THE NAVIDAD RESOURCES, LLC FERGUSON STATE PRISON FARM UNIT PROJECT IN MADISON COUNTY, TEXAS

Summary of Other State Archeological Guidelines

Station Street/Haig Road Extension Environmental Assessment (EA)Study. Welcome

Land adjacent to Dingle Dock, Front Street, East Garston

Appendix D DRAFT. Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment Report. Appendix D

1 STATUTORY PUBLIC MEETING INFORMATION REPORT PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO 6 TO THE YORK REGION OFFICIAL PLAN, 2010 ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES

Spadina Subway Extension Downsview Station to Steeles Avenue Environmental Assessment

ENBRIDGE GAS DISTRIBUTION INC. Proposed Relocation for Ninth Line, Markham and Whitchurch-Stouffville. Environmental Screening Report

MONITORING REPORT: No. 283

Archaeological Evaluation and Assessment of Land at Kent Cottage, 19 Chapel Street, Hythe, Kent

MONITORING REPORT: No. 276

Centre for Archaeological Fieldwork, School of Archaeology and Palaeoecology, Queen s University Belfast.

VILLAGE OF BOLTON HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN

ASI ORIGINAL REPORT. Prepared for: Golden Arch Tech Investment Corporation 1092 Argyle Drive Oakville, ON L6J 1A7 T

Appendix H. Stage 1 Archaeological Resource Assessment for the Annexed Lands

MUNICIPALITY OF NORTH GRENVILLE. PROPOSED WATERFRONT TRAILS AND PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE ON THE SOUTH BRANCH OF THE RIDEAU RIVER Kemptville, Ontario

Garden District Heritage Conservation District Study

McKay Road Interchange and Salem / Lockhart Crossing

and The Ontario Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport

APPENDIX G. Historical Resources Overview Documentation

EVALUATION REPORT No. 300

ARCHAEOLOGIX INC. 14 Oxford Street West, London ON N6H 1P9 ~ T: (519) F: (519) ~

1.0 PROJECT REPORT COVER PAGE

CULTURAL HERITAGE ASSESSMENT REPORT CULTURAL HERITAGE LANDSCAPE & BUILT HERITAGE FEATURES

Submitted to. Canada Building Materials Company 55 Industrial Street, Toronto, Ontario, M4G 3W9 Phone: (416) , Fax: (416)

MONITORING REPORT: No. 289

Long Range Solid Waste Management Plan Environmental Assessment

STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION WITTON PARK, COUNTY DURHAM PROPOSED QUARRY EXTENSION DECEMBER 1992

PennDOT. single spann lanes and 3- mayy need to be to accommodate. any bridge. addition to III. Date: CRP 07/27/2015 CRP.

Archaeological Investigation in advance of Development at 2 Palace Cottages, Charing Palace, Charing, Kent

The MSII reports for the bridge indicate that the Annual Average Daily Traffic at the bridge is 100. The road can be considered a low volume road.

Gryme s Dyke, Stanway Green

Monitoring Report No. 168

Municipal Heritage Bridges Cultural, Heritage and Archaeological Resources Assessment Checklist Revised April 11, 2014

Merrowdene, Earleydene, Sunninghill, Berkshire

Glue Pot Farm, Edwards Lane, Bramfield, Suffolk. BMF 024

a) buildings, structures and artifacts of historical significance;

Final Initial Study. Chalice Unitarian Universalist Congregation Conditional Use Permit

Land at Downsview Avenue, Storrington, West Sussex

APPENDIX E. Appendix E Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment

Chitty Farmhouse Extension, Wall Lane, Silchester, Hampshire

Centre for Archaeological Fieldwork Evaluation/Monitoring Report No Monitoring Report No. 201

McCormick Pit Category 1 Class A License, Pit Below Water For Blueland Farms Limited. Visual Impact Assessment Report February 2013

Municipal Obligations Archaeological Heritage Screening. Heritage Conservation Branch Ministry of Parks, Culture and Sport November 14, 2018

COUNTY OF LAMBTON OFFICIAL PLAN UPDATE BACKGROUND REPORT NO.

Meales Farm, Sulhamstead, West Berkshire

TRCA Field Staking Protocol December 2016

DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION PLANNING RATIONALE 5100 KANATA AVENUE CITY OF OTTAWA. Hawthorn Retirement Group MALONE GIVEN PARSONS LTD.

Submitted to: Mr. Sam Greenwood Greenwood Construction Dufferin County Road 109 Orangeville, ON L9W 2Y9 Tel:

Heritage Impact Assessment York Road Environmental Design Study City of Guelph, Ontario APPENDIX A FIGURES. Project Number TP115100

PLANNING RATIONALE. Shadow Ridge Estates Subdivision, Phase Two. In Support of a Proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment. Report Number: R

APPENDIX 1: SCOPED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (EIS) FORM

Evaluation/monitoring Report No. 241 KING S CASTLE NURSING HOME ARDGLASS CO. DOWN AE/12/19 SARAH GORMLEY

An Archaeological Evaluation at Granta Cottages, Newmarket Road, Great Chesterford, Essex. August 2015

Archaeological Monitoring of Land at 29 Royal Pier Road, Gravesend, Kent

Archaeological evaluation: land to the rear of Clare Road, Braintree, Essex

Northbury Farm, Castle End Road, Ruscombe, Berkshire

ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVALUATION AT THE FORMER WATTON GARDEN CENTRE, NORWICH ROAD, WATTON, NORFOLK OCTOBER 2003 (Accession number WAT)

Newcombe House & Kensington Church Street

STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION

Chapter 8: Cultural Heritage Assessment

London s Bus Rapid Transit System

New horse training area, Manor Farm, Great Kimble, Buckinghamshire

Garage Site, Foots Cray High Street, Sidcup, Kent, London Borough of Bexley

Monitoring of invasive groundworks ahead of the installation of a septic tank at 16a, 16b and 16c Donegore Hill Muckamore County Antrim

Baby Point Heritage Conservation District Study. Kick-off Community Meeting March 27, 2017 Humbercrest United Church

McCormick Property Part Lot 12, Concession 2 EHS, Town of Caledon, Region of Peel For Blueland Farms Limited

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION

Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment (Background Study and Property Inspection)

Town of Newmarket 395 Mulock Drive P.O. Box 328, Newmarket, Ontario, L3Y 4X7. Website: newmarket.ca Phone:

Transcription:

Waste Management of Canada Corporation Environmental Assessment for a New Landfill Footprint at the West Carleton Environmental Centre ARCHEOLOGY DETAILED IMPACT ASSESSMENT Prepared by: Archeoworks Inc. Project Number: 60242342 Date: August, 2012

Stage 2 Archaeological Assessment (AA): West Carleton Environmental Centre Within Parts of Lots 4 and 5, Concession 3 Former Township of Huntley County of Carleton City of Ottawa Ontario Project #: 148-OT553-11 Licencee (#): Jessica Marr (P334) PIF#: P334-140-2011 Original Report January 27 th, 2012 Presented to: AECOM 300 Town Centre Blvd Suite 300 Markham, ON L3R 5Z6 T: 905.477.8400 F: 905.477.1456 Prepared by: Archeoworks Inc. 16715-12 Yonge Street, Suite #1029 Newmarket, Ontario L3X 1X4 T: 416.676.5597 F: 416.676.5810

ARCHEOWORKS INC. i Executive Summary Archeoworks Inc. was retained by AECOM to conduct a Stage 2 archaeological assessment (AA) of the Preferred Landfill Footprint Option at the West Carleton Environmental Centre (WCEC). The Stage 1 archaeological assessment of proposed expansion alternatives to the WCEC identified potential for the recovery of historic Euro-Canadian and Aboriginal archaeological remains within select portions of each of the alternative footprints due to the proximity of a secondary watercourse an unnamed tributary of the Carp River. Thus, it was recommended that a Stage 2 archaeological assessment be undertaken in all undisturbed, high potential locations to be impacted by construction. The Stage 2 archaeological assessment of the preferred landfill footprint alternative involved the confirmation of disturbed locations within the study area limits, consisting of extensive grading and aggregate removal that resulted in the absence of any topsoil, a gravel access roadway, as well as dumping activities. The remainder of the subject property, consisting of agricultural fields and woodlots, was subjected to both test pit and pedestrian investigation as appropriate. Despite careful scrutiny, no archaeological remains were encountered. The entire study area should, therefore, be considered free from any further archaeological concern. Stage 2 AA: West Carleton Environmental Centre within Parts of Lots 4 and 5, Concession 3, City of Ottawa, Former Township of Huntley

ARCHEOWORKS INC. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary... i Table of Contents... ii Project Personnel... iii 1.0 Project Context... 1-3 2.0 Field Methods... 3-4 3.0 Record of Finds... 4 4.0 Analysis and Conclusions... 4 5.0 Recommendations... 4 6.0 Advice on Compliance with Legislation... 4-5 7.0 Bibliography and Sources... 6 Tables Table 1: Sites within Two Kilometres of the Stage 1 AA Study Area... 2 Appendices Appendix A: Maps... 7-10 Appendix B: Images... 11-13 Appendix C: Site Plan of West Carleton Environmental Centre Expansion... 14 Appendix D: Inventory of Documentary and Material Record... 15 Stage 2 AA: West Carleton Environmental Centre within Parts of Lots 4 and 5, Concession 3, City of Ottawa, Former Township of Huntley

ARCHEOWORKS INC. iii Project Personnel: Project and Field Director... Jessica Marr MTC licence P334 Kim Slocki - MTC licence P029 Field Archaeologists... Kassandra Aldridge Jessica Marr - MTC licence P334 Katie Mather Lee Templeton Report Preparation... Jessica Marr - MTC licence P334 Graphics... Jessica Marr - MTC licence P334 Stage 2 AA: West Carleton Environmental Centre within Parts of Lots 4 and 5, Concession 3, City of Ottawa, Former Township of Huntley

ARCHEOWORKS INC. 1 1.0 PROJECT CONTEXT 1.1 Development Context Archaeological Services Inc. was initially contracted by Gartner Lee Limited, on behalf of Waste Management of Canada Corporation in 2006, to conduct a Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment (AA) of proposed expansion alternatives to the West Carleton Environmental Centre (WCEC), in the City of Ottawa, Ontario (see Appendix A Map 1). Archeoworks Inc. was retained by AECOM to conduct a Stage 2 AA of the preferred landfill footprint alternative at the WCEC (see Draft Plan Appendix C). The footprint alternative, measuring approximately 50 hectares in size, consists of agricultural fields, wooded areas, wetlands, and select disturbed locations including roadways, aggregate extraction and grading. The Stage 2 assessment, reported herein, was conducted under the project direction of Ms. Jessica Marr, in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act (1990) and the Ontario Environmental Assessment Act under archaeological consulting licence number P334. Permission to investigate the study area and to collect any encountered archaeological material was granted on November 9 th, 2011. 1.2 Historical and Archaeological Context 1.2.1 Stage 1 AA Summary The pre-survey research, outlined in the Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment: West Carleton Environmental Centre, Environmental Assessment, City of Ottawa, Ontario (Archaeological Services Inc., 2006) report, identified the potential for the recovery of historic Euro-Canadian and Aboriginal archaeological resources within undisturbed portions of the preferred landfill footprint option. The background research included a review of the Ministry of Tourism and Culture s archaeological site database, which revealed that nine archaeological sites had been registered within a four-kilometre radius of the WCEC, one of which is within two kilometres (see Table 1), thus indicating a potential for encountering archaeological resources. The Stage 1 AA established archaeological potential for the location and recovery of Aboriginal material within the study area limits due to the proximity of an unnamed tributary of the Carp River, a secondary watercourse. The determination of historic potential was based on a review of the 1879 Illustrated Historical Atlas of the County of Carleton, which revealed that the parts of Lots 4 and 5, Concession 3, where the preferred landfill footprint option lies, contained one historic structure and was located immediately adjacent to Carp Road, a historic transportation route (see Map 3). Finally, the Stage 1 report identified areas with no archaeological potential due to their disturbed condition. These disturbances were caused by aggregate extraction and grading Stage 2 AA: West Carleton Environmental Centre within Parts of Lots 4 and 5, Concession 3, City of Ottawa, Former Township of Huntley

ARCHEOWORKS INC. 2 associated with a kitchen factory, and residential development along Carp Road. This classification of no archaeological potential has been accepted by the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport (Sherratt, 2008). Table 1: Sites Within Four Kilometres of the Ottawa WMF Borden # Name Cultural Affiliation Type BhFx-21 Feldspar Mines Euro-Canadian Mine BhFx-22 -- Pre-Contact Lithic Scatter BhFx-23 Rockeries Tip Euro-Canadian Midden BhFx-24 Huston Homestead Euro-Canadian Farmstead BhFx-25 Stewart/Moore Euro-Canadian Farmstead Homestead BhFx-26 Allen Euro-Canadian Undetermined BhFx-27 Corelview Archaic, Middle to Late Lithic Scatter BhGa-6 Cavanagh Euro-Canadian Pre-Contact Homestead BhGa-7 Fall s Hay Barn Euro-Canadian Barn 1.2.2 Previous Archaeological Assessments Previous archaeological fieldwork conducted in lands within and immediately adjacent (i.e., within 50 metres) to the subject area are limited to the Stage 1 AA carried out by Archaeological Services Inc. in 2006. Due to the nature of a Stage 1 AA, the report only addressed the potential for the location of archaeological sites in the area and not whether any were actually located. The relevant parts of that report were summarized in the previous section. 1.2.3 Past Land Conditions and Uses A review of the 1879 Illustrated Historical Atlas of the County of Carleton (see Map 3) does not lend any insight to the land conditions of the study area during that time. The index of people who lived within the study area, although vague, does indicate that Rich Kemp was a farmer who settled in the area in the 1830s. Although he only owned a small portion of the study area, it is likely that his farming activities resulted in the clearing of this land for agricultural use. The other land owners within the study area did not have a listed occupation. The 1998 NTS Map indicates that by this time, the area was no longer used for agricultural purposes and was heavily disturbed by the WCEC, as well as the Laurysen Kitchen Company. 1.2.4 Current Land Conditions and Uses The current subject area, consisting of a woodlot, marshlands, agricultural fields, and a graded area that has been used for aggregate extraction, measuring approximately 50 hectares in total, is situated within a largely rural setting on the outskirts of the City of Ottawa (see Map 1). The subject area lies within the Ottawa Valley Clay Plains physiographic region of Ontario, a region characterized as having clay plains that are interrupted by ridges of rock or sand (Chapman and Putnam, 1984). The topography within the subject area limits can be described as smooth with some sloping areas Stage 2 AA: West Carleton Environmental Centre within Parts of Lots 4 and 5, Concession 3, City of Ottawa, Former Township of Huntley

ARCHEOWORKS INC. 3 mainly from grading activities. The soil in the subject area varied from a dark sandy loam to a lighter clay soil. 1.2.5 Dates of Fieldwork The Stage 2 AA of the study area, as illustrated in Map 4, was undertaken from November 21 st thru to November 24 th of 2011. The weather during the Stage 2 investigations ranged from sunny and clear to slightly overcast to snowing, with temperatures averaging 2 o C. The weather and lighting conditions during the Stage 2 investigation permitted good visibility of all parts of the study area and were conducive to the identification and recovery of archaeological resources. 2.0 FIELD METHODS This field assessment was conducted in compliance with the 2011 Standards and Guidelines for Consultant Archaeologists ( 2011 S&G ), published by the MTC. Photographic images of the study area are presented within Appendix B. Location and orientation information associated with all photographs taken in the field are provided within Map 4. 2.1 Identified Disturbances / Areas of Low Archaeological Potential Identified disturbances consisted of areas of extensive grading and aggregate removal that resulted in the absence of any topsoil, a gravel access roadway, as well as dumping activities (see Appendix B Images 1-5). The majority of these disturbances were documented in 2008 by ASI, and amounted to 26.2 acres (52%) of the entire study area. Due to the low archaeological potential classification of these areas, a systematic survey was not warranted, nor undertaken in these locations. Additionally, marsh and wetland areas were not tested due to the absence of archaeological potential (see Appendix B Image 6). These areas amounted to 1.0 hectares (2.0%) of the study area. The remainder of the study area was subjected to pedestrian and test pit surveys as appropriate, described in Sections 2.2 and 2.3 below, respectively. 2.2 Pedestrian Survey Approximately 15.6 hectares (32%) was subjected to a pedestrian form of survey. This survey method involves systematically walking ploughed areas within the property, and mapping and collecting artifacts found on the ground surface. The lands were recently ploughed and subjected to the appropriate weathering requirements according to Section 2.1.1, Section 3 of the 2011 S&G. Ploughing was conducted deep enough to provide total topsoil exposure, but not deeper than previous ploughing. Greater than 80% of the ploughed ground surface was visible at the time of survey and the ploughed fields were tested at survey transects of five metres (see Images 7-10). No archaeological material was encountered during the pedestrian investigation. Stage 2 AA: West Carleton Environmental Centre within Parts of Lots 4 and 5, Concession 3, City of Ottawa, Former Township of Huntley

ARCHEOWORKS INC. 4 2.3 Test Pit Investigation The remainder of the study area, approximately 7.2 hectares (14%) of woodlot, was subjected to systematic test pit survey, performed at standard five-metre intervals. Furthermore, test-pitting was conducted until the exposed test-pit profile revealed evidence of recent ground disturbance. Test pit surveys are defined as excavating 30x30cm units at set intervals on a grid pattern in areas requiring this form of assessment. A total of approximately 2952 test pits were excavated to depths of between 10-30 centimetres, and the topsoil was screened through six-millimetre mesh in order to facilitate the recovery of artifacts (see Images 11-12). All test pits were examined for stratigraphy, cultural features and evidence of fill and were excavated into the first five centimetres of subsoil. All test pits were backfilled. No archaeological material was encountered during the test-pit investigation. 3.0 RECORD OF FINDS Despite careful scrutiny, no archaeological resources were encountered during the Stage 2 AA of the study area. 4.0 ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS No archaeological sites were identified during the Stage 2 AA of the study area. 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS During the Stage 2 AA of the preferred landfill footprint option, at the WCEC, no archaeological resources were encountered. As a result, it is recommended that: 1. No further archaeological concern is warranted for those lands identified within this report as having been subjected to Stage 2 AA. The above recommendation is subject to MTC approval. No excavation activities shall take place within the study area prior to the MTC (Heritage Operations Unit) confirming in writing that all archaeological licensing and technical review requirements have been satisfied. 6.0 ADVICE ON COMPLIANCE WITH LEGISLATION 1. This report is submitted to the MTC as a condition of licensing in accordance with Part VI of the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c0.18. The report is reviewed to ensure that it complies with the standards and guidelines that are issued by the Minister, and that the archaeological fieldwork and report recommendations ensure the conservation, protection and preservation of the cultural heritage of Ontario. When all matters relating to archaeological sites within the project area of a development proposal have been addressed to the satisfaction of the Ministry of Tourism and Culture, a letter will be issued by the ministry stating that there Stage 2 AA: West Carleton Environmental Centre within Parts of Lots 4 and 5, Concession 3, City of Ottawa, Former Township of Huntley

ARCHEOWORKS INC. 5 are no further concerns with regard to alterations to archaeological sites by the proposed development. 2. It is an offence under Sections 48 and 69 of the Ontario Heritage Act for any party other than a licensed archaeologist to make any alteration to a known archaeological site or to remove any artifact or other physical evidence of past human use or activity from the site, until such time as a licensed archaeologist has completed archaeological fieldwork on the site, submitted a report to the Minister stating that the site has no further cultural heritage value or interest, and the report has been filed in the Ontario Public Register of Archaeology Reports referred to in Section 65.1 of the Ontario Heritage Act. 3. Should previously undocumented archaeological resources be discovered, they may be a new archaeological site and therefore subject to Section 48 (1) of the Ontario Heritage Act. The proponent or person discovering the archaeological resources must cease alteration of the site immediately and engage a licensed consultant archaeologist to carry out archaeological fieldwork, in compliance with Section 48 (1) of the Ontario Heritage Act. 4. The Cemeteries Act, R.S.O. 1990 c. C.4 and the Funeral, Burial and Cremation Services Act, 2002, S.O. 2002, c.33 (when proclaimed in force) require that any person discovering human remains must notify the police or coroner and the Registrar of Cemeteries at the Ministry of Consumer Services. Under Section 6 of Regulation 881 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Archeoworks Inc. will, keep in safekeeping all objects of archaeological significance that are found under the authority of the licence and all field records that are made in the course of the work authorized by the licence, except where the objects and records are donated to Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario or are directed to be deposited in a public institution under subsection 66 (1) of the Act. Stage 2 AA: West Carleton Environmental Centre within Parts of Lots 4 and 5, Concession 3, City of Ottawa, Former Township of Huntley

ARCHEOWORKS INC. 6 7.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY AND SOURCES Archaeological Services Inc. 2006 Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment: Ottawa Waste Management Facility Environmental Assessment, City of Ottawa, Ontario. Toronto. PIF# P057-274-2006 Chapman, L. J. and Putnam, D. F. 1984 The Physiography of Southern Ontario. 3rd ed. (Ontario Geological Survey Vol. 2). Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. H. Belden & Co. 1879 Illustrated Historical Atlas of the County of Carleton (including City of Ottawa), Ontario. Toronto. Retrieved from http://digital.library.mcgill.ca/countyatlas/images/maps/townshipmaps/carm-huntley.jpg, December 6, 2011. Ontario Ministry of Tourism & Culture 2011 Standards and Guidelines for Consulting Archaeologists. Toronto Sherratt, Jim June 19, 2008 Letter to Archaeological Services Inc. Concurrence with Report Entitled Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment Ottawa Waste Management Facility Environmental Assessment, City of Ottawa, Ontario, PIF/Licence No. P057-274-2006, MCL File 06WS013. TS. Websites Consulted: http://www.laurysenkitchens.com/aboutlaurysen/generalinfo/ Stage 2 AA: West Carleton Environmental Centre within Parts of Lots 4 and 5, Concession 3, City of Ottawa, Former Township of Huntley

ARCHEOWORKS INC. APPENDIX A: MAPS Map 1: Results of Stage 1 AA of North Expansion Alternative as reported by ASI, 2006. Stage 2 AA: West Carleton Environmental Centre within Parts of Lots 4 and 5, Concession 3, City of Ottawa, Former Township of Huntley 7

ARCHEOWORKS INC. 8 Map 2: National Topographical System Map (1998) identifying the study area limits of the Stage 2 AA. Stage 2 AA: West Carleton Environmental Centre within Parts of Lots 4 and 5, Concession 3, City of Ottawa, Former Township of Huntley

ARCHEOWORKS INC. 9 Map 3: Study area within the Illustrated Historical Atlas of the County of Carleton, Township of Huntley, 1879. Stage 2 AA: West Carleton Environmental Centre within Parts of Lots 4 and 5, Concession 3, City of Ottawa, Former Township of Huntley

ARCHEOWORKS INC. 10 Map 4: Stage 2 AA with photo locations marked. Stage 2 AA: West Carleton Environmental Centre within Parts of Lots 4 and 5, Concession 3, City of Ottawa, Former Township of Huntley

ARCHEOWORKS INC. 11 APPENDIX B: IMAGES Image 1: Looking southwest at farmer access gravel road disturbance. Image 2: Looking east at disturbances in woodlot dumping activities. Image 3: Looking southeast at disturbances associated with grading and aggregate removal. Image 4: Looking north at disturbances associated with grading and aggregate removal. Stage 2 AA: West Carleton Environmental Centre within Parts of Lots 4 and 5, Concession 3, City of Ottawa, Former Township of Huntley

ARCHEOWORKS INC. 12 Image 5: Looking south at disturbances associated with grading and aggregate removal. Image 6: Looking northeast at wet area. Image 7: Looking northwest at pedestrian survey at 5m intervals. Image 8: Looking at excellent visibility of ploughed fields. Stage 2 AA: West Carleton Environmental Centre within Parts of Lots 4 and 5, Concession 3, City of Ottawa, Former Township of Huntley

ARCHEOWORKS INC. 13 Image 9: Looking northwest at pedestrian survey at 5m intervals. Image 10: Looking at excellent visibility of ploughed fields I Image 11: Looking west at test pit survey at 5m intervals within the woodlot. Image 12: Looking east at test pit survey at 5m intervals in the Woodlot at the access road. Stage 2 AA: West Carleton Environmental Centre within Parts of Lots 4 and 5, Concession 3, City of Ottawa, Former Township of Huntley

ARCHEOWORKS INC. 14 APPENDIX C: SITE PLAN OF WEST CARLETON ENVIRONMENTAL CENTRE EXPANSION Stage 2 AA: West Carleton Environmental Centre within Parts of Lots 4 and 5, Concession 3, City of Ottawa, Former Township of Huntley

ARCHEOWORKS INC. 15 APPENDIX D: INVENTORY OF DOCUMENTARY AND MATERIAL RECORD Project Information: Project Number: Licensee: MTC PIF: 148-OT553-11 Jessica Marr P334-140-2011 Document/ Material Location Comments 1. Written Field Notes, Annotated Field Maps Archeoworks Inc., 16715-12 Yonge Street, Suite 1029, Newmarket, ON, Canada, L3X 1X4 Stored on Archeoworks network servers 2. Field (Digital) Archeoworks Inc., 16715-12 Yonge Street, Suite 1029, Newmarket, ON, Canada, L3X 1X4 Stored on Archeoworks network servers 3. Research/ Analysis/ Reporting Material Archeoworks Inc., 16715-12 Yonge Street, Suite 1029, Newmarket, ON, Canada, L3X 1X4 Stored on Archeoworks network servers Under Section 6 of Regulation 881 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Archeoworks Inc. will, keep in safekeeping all objects of archaeological significance that are found under the authority of the licence and all field records that are made in the course of the work authorized by the licence, except where the objects and records are donated to Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario or are directed to be deposited in a public institution under subsection 66 (1) of the Act. Stage 2 AA: West Carleton Environmental Centre within Parts of Lots 4 and 5, Concession 3, City of Ottawa, Former Township of Huntley