Recent Advances in Large Area Micro-channel Plates and LAPPD TM Incom, Inc. Christopher Craven, Bernhard Adams, Melvin Aviles, Justin Bond, Till Cremer, Michael Foley, Alexey Lyashenko, Michael Minot, Mark Popecki, Michael Stochaj, William Worstell Argonne National Laboratory Jeffrey Elam, Anil Mane University of Chicago Henry Frisch, Andrey Elagin U.C. Berkeley, Space Sciences Laboratory Oswald Siegmund, Camden Ertley Iowa State Matthew Wetstein Incom, Inc. 294 Southbridge Road Charlton, MA 01507 USA 508-909-2200 www.incomusa.com mjm@incomusa.com 1
Incom MCPs How they are made Advantages Performance Outline The Large Area Picosecond Photodetector (LAPPD ) Applications Design Performance of sealed tiles 2
How Incom MCPs are Made Draw glass tubes, bundle, redraw Fuse into glass capillary array blocks 3
Process into Polished Glass Capillary Arrays Wire saw Machine to size, grind, polish, clean 4
Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD) Coating Converts Glass Capillary Arrays into MCPs Resistance can be tuned to desired value Al 2 O 3 or MgO secondary electron emissive layer (SEE) for high gain (Mane, et al., 2012) Illustration from Ertley, 2016 Illustration from Wiza, 1979 5
Advantages of the GCA/ALD Approach Glass and coating can be independently optimized Stronger glass = larger size for a given pore size & thickness Flat (not specified, but typically <100 µm over 20 cm x 20 cm area) Alkali-free = low intrinsic noise, <0.045 cts/sec/cm 2 (Ertley, 2016) 20 cm sq., 1.2 mm thick 9.5 cm sq., 0.25 mm thick 12.7 cm sq., 0.6 mm thick 6
Stability of MgO Emissive Layer (Data from 33 mm dia. 20 µm pore MCPs) Siegmund, et al., AMOS 2012 Al 2 O 3 has historically be used for 20 cm MCPs Now we are also developing MgO coating methods for the large area MCPs, important for sealed detectors 7
1.E+04 1.E+03 1.E+02 Gain vs. Voltage for 20 cm x 20 cm MCPs, 20 µm Pores Two individual MCPs with Al 2 O 3 SEE layer MCP Pairs, MgO and Al 2 O 3 SEE Layers MgO Al 2 O 3 1.E+01 1.E+00 1.E-01 1.E-02 1.E-03 C00089-013 C00023-047 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 MCP Voltage (V) 200 V between MCPs MgO gain 1 x 10 7 @ 1000 V/MCP Al 2 O 3 gain 3 x 10 6 @ 1000 V/MCP, 1 x 10 7 @ 1100 V/MCP 8
Pulse Height Distribution (PHD) in 20 cm MCPs Al 2 O 3 SEE Layer MgO SEE Layer Normalized Normalized Well peaked, especially MgO-coated MCPs Less sensitivity to threshold variations 9
Al 2 O 3 Gain Uniformity, Background Rate (data @ 1000V/MCP) Background after scrubbing (file 1920160328 ) < 10% variation over 400 cm 2 area Background rate: Best = 0.05 cts/sec/cm 2 (Ertley, et al. 2016) Typical = 1 ct/sec/cm 2, including hot spots 1901160328160328 10
MgO Gain Uniformity, Background Rate (data @ 1150V/MCP) < 37% variation over full area Background rate: 0.76 cts/sec/cm 2 2017-03-08 1838 fits.map C00101-029 & C00101-006 11
Summary of Results, 20cm x 20cm MCPs Al 2 O 3 SEE layer Gain 1 x 10 7 @ 1100 V/MCP Gain variation < 10% over full 400 cm 2 area Background rates typically < 1 ct/sec/cm 2 MgO emissive layer Gain 1 x 10 7 @ 1000 V/MCP Gain variation < 37% over full area Background rates typically < 1 ct/sec/cm 2 MgO on 20 cm MCPs is being optimized, will be incorporated into LAPPDs 12
Incom MCPs How they are made Advantages Performance Outline The Large Area Picosecond Photodetector (LAPPD ) Applications Design Performance of sealed tiles 13
Applications Cherenkov/scintillation light separation for particle ID TOF measurements Optical Time Projection Chambers Plenoptic imaging Positron emission tomography (PET) ANNIE Accelerator Neutrino Neutron Interactions Experiment MCP-PMT for high spatial and temporal (ps-scale) resolution over large areas, at lower cost 14
Borofloat or fused silica window with photocathode on inside surface LAPPD Design 22 cm 23 cm 20 cm x 20 cm MCPs, spacers Strip line anode and sidewall 2.1 cm Signal readout, both ends of strip lines Voltage tab at each corner to independently power MCPs Results using demountable test station (Wetstein, et al. 2012) Single PE Multiple PEs Time resolution 50 ps 17 ps/2 ps? Differential timing resolution 5 ps Spatial resolution 1.5 mm 0.7 mm Illustration provided by Univ. of Chicago 15
Spatial Resolution (LAPPD12) Laser Trigger Pulse LAPPD12 Strip lines connected into serpentine path (simplifies electronics) Position determined by relative arrival times 16
0.0E+00 1.0E+06 2.0E+06 3.0E+06 4.0E+06 5.0E+06 6.0E+06 7.0E+06 Counts 0.0E+00 1.0E+06 2.0E+06 3.0E+06 4.0E+06 5.0E+06 6.0E+06 7.0E+06 Counts PHD for Single Photons (LAPPD10) 1.0E+05 1.0E+04 1.0E+03 1.0E+02 Illuminated with dimmed room light 950V 960V 970V 980V 990V LAPPD10 1.0E+01 1000V 1.0E+00 Gain With room lights on/off, 200 V bias on PC, MCA threshold 50 mv 1.E+05 1.E+04 1.E+03 1.E+02 1.E+01 1.E+00 4.4kHz 11.6Hz 1000V lights OFF 1000V lights ON Dark counts are over full area, and include both MCP and PC dark rates Gain 17
Average QE [%] Photocathode: High, Stable Quantum Efficiency (QE) (LAPPD 15) 3 Days After Sealing 32 Days After Sealing LAPPD15 Average QE=30.3% QE max : 35.3% QE min : 21.7% Uniformity (QE min /QE max ): 61% 40 30 20 10 Average QE=30.4% QE max : 35.5% 0 QE min : 22% Uniformity (QE min /QE max ): 62% 4/2 4/10 4/18 4/26 5/4 30% average QE No degradation after a month Cause for lower QE in corner is known (shadowing of PC sources) 18
QE Photocathode QE Uniformity (LAPPD 13) LAPPD13 QE measured at various locations, room temp. 35% 30% QE @ 1 25% 20% QE @ 2 15% QE @ 3 10% QE @ 4 5% 0% QE @ 5 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 Wavelength [nm] Average QE=28.6% QE max : 31.2% QE min : 24.4% Uniformity (QE min /QE max ): 78% 4 1 2 3 5 LAPPD13 19
QE Photocathode Repeatability (LAPPDs 13-16) In-Situ QE Before Sealing (at process temperature) 25% 20% LAPPD13 LAPPD14 15% LAPPD15 10% LAPPD16 5% 0% 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 Wavelength [nm] In-situ measurements are uncalibrated, used only for reference LAPPDs 14 & 16 did not seal, but performance of PC was similar 20
LAPPD Summary Multiple tiles have been sealed Clear pulses Positional information obtained from differential timing Photocathode QE >30% (@365 nm), uniformity >75% over 400 cm 2 area of tile Dark count rates (combined MCPs and PC) < 1 ct/sec/cm 2 Seal integrity: 8 months and counting Photocathode stability: 1 month and counting Now that we have functional tiles, other design aspects are being optimized LAPPDs are currently being tested by collaborators 21
Acknowledgements United States Department of Energy Grant # DE-SC0009717, TTO Ph I, II, IIA Fully Integrated Sealed Detector Devices, 2013-2018 Grant # DE-SC0011262, SBIR Ph I, Ph II Further Development of Large-Area Micro-channel Plates for a Broad Range of Commercial Applications, 2014 2017 LAPPD Collaboration Argonne National Laboratory; Fermilab; University of California, Berkeley, Space Sciences Laboratory; University of Chicago; University of Hawaii 22
Thanks! LAPPD, Package/Housing Characteristics Housing Size 230 mm x 220 mm x 22 mm thick Housing Material Borosilicate Glass Window Material Borosilicate or Fused Silica Photocathode Material Multi-Alkali (K 2 NaSb) Anode Configuration 28 silver strips, nominally 50 Ω Voltage Distribution 5 taps for independent control of voltage to the photocathode and entry and exit MCPs Wavelength Sensitivity <350 nm to >625 nm Contacts: Chris Craven cac@incomusa.com Dr. Michael Minot mjm@incomusa.com Microchannel Plate (MCP) Characteristics Arrangement Two Positioned in a Chevron Pair Dimensions 203 mm x 203 mm x 1.2 mm thick MCP substrate Borosilicate Glass Capillary Pore Size 20 µm Capillary Open Area Ratio 60-65% Typical Gain 1 x 10 7 Resistive and Emissive Coatings Applied via Atomic Layer Deposition Emissive Layer Material Al 2 O 3 23
Supporting Slides 24
Dicing Automatic scribing capability, ± 0.08 mm precision For GCAs and MCPs 20 cm MCPs can be mapped and diced to produce smaller MCPs with matched resistance 25
QE Measurement LED Iris QE LAPPD λ = QE PD λ [I PC λ I PCdark λ ] R(λ) [I PD λ I PDdark λ ] T(λ) NIST Calibrated photodiode, QE PD 50:50 Beam Splitter R, T - I PD LAPPD 15 LAPPD I PC QE is measured in-situ during deposition and after tile is sealed 26
MCP Measurement Charge deposition Delay line anode 8 MCPs T 1 + Q 1 Spatial gain image Charge pulse histogram UV light UV source Delay line anode T 2 + Q 2 8 MCPs UV light UV source Gain = Output current/ Input current Output current from Exit MCP increases with Exit MCP voltage Input current to Exit MCP held constant 27
From Concept to Commercialization LAPPD Collaboration Incom funded by DOE 1 st LAPPD tile sealed 2016 LAPPD9 Results using demountable test station (Wetstein, et al. 2012) Single PE Multiple PE Time resolution 50 ps 17 ps/2 ps? Differential timing resolution 5 ps Spatial resolution 1.5 mm 0.7 mm Design validated using demountable test station (Wetstein, et al. 2013, Elagin 2013) Prototype sealed tiles now being made by Incom 28