Date: Place: Technical University of Denmark. Knowledge FOr Resilient society

Similar documents
Table EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE a OCCUPANCY SYSTEM SYSTEM. A, E, F-1, I-1, M, b,d R, S-1. B c. F-2, S-2, U c

COSTCO, SAN FRANCISCO A PRESCRIPTIVE AND PERFORMANCE BASED ANALYSIS OF FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS AND DESIGN

How to Use Fire Risk Assessment Tools to Evaluate Performance Based Designs

2017 CIDA Standards Infused into Undergraduate Courses

Case Study 1 Underground Car Park

Case Study of Underground Car Park. Team Japan

CIDA Curriculum Matrix - Miami University First Year

Y. ORMIERES. Fire risk analysis method for nuclear installations

This document is a preview generated by EVS

Application of the New Italian Fire Safety Code (D.M. 3 agosto 2015) to Case Study 3 Mall. Enrico Danzi Luca Fiorentini Luca Marmo Vincenzo Puccia

The Swedish National Board of Housing, Building and Planning s general recommendations on the analytical design of a building s fire protection, BBRAD

Active & Passive Fire Protection System. Page 1 Kalidasan S BT IN SSP-OP

F.R.A.M.E. EVENT NETWORKS used in "FRAME".

On the Architectural Engineering Competences in Architectural Design MSc in Engineering with Specialization in Architecture Kirkegaard, Poul Henning

Fire prevention and protection

FIRE DEPARTMENT - RULES FOR FIRE PROTECTION IN AUSTRIA

FINDINGS FROM FIRE TESTS IN TUNNEL CONSTRUCTIONS WITH VENTILATION SYSTEMS AND FIXED FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS

Are we using the wrong design fires for tall building fire strategies, in light of recent full height fires?

Statue of Liberty: A Risk Analysis

Contents HEALTH AND SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FIRE PREVENTION AND EVACUATION PROCEDURE. 1. Introduction. 2. Warning in the event of fire

Emergency Evacuation Plan. Tiffany Tower Plot W2 Jumeirah Lakes Towers

BRE: Stay-put or Evacuate? Carl Sherwood BRE Fire Safety Group 22 nd July Part of the BRE Trust

Fire prevention and protection

SOCIETY OF FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERS POSITION STATEMENT P THE ROLE OF THE FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER IN THE CONSTRUCTION DESIGN PROCESS

Selecting appropriate egress strategies

Based on NFPA 1003: Standard for Airport Fire Fighter Professional Qualifications 2015 Edition

AVAILABLE TO DOWNLOAD ON THE APOLLO APP. Pocket guide to. Fire Alarm Systems Design BS Standard

Fire Safety in Tall Building: Performance-Based Solutions. Chris Jelenewicz, P.E., FSFPE

ISO/TR TECHNICAL REPORT. Fire-safety engineering Technical information on methods for evaluating behaviour and movement of people

Minimum Standards for Engineers Practicing Fire Protection Engineering in the State of Oklahoma September 14, 2016

MEDIUM-DENSITY HOUSING # 7. Fire safety

Building Fire Safety in New York City s Existing Office Buildings

Performance Requirement for Building Fire Safety from the Viewpoint of Firefighting and Rescue Activity

Franz Evegren. Robust brandriskbedömning ur ett IMO-perspektiv

New developments in Nordic countries in fire safety engineering guidance

SURREY FIRE SERVICE. Construction Fire Safety Plan Bulletin

Case Study 1 Underground car park

COMMISSIONING OF LIFE SAFETY AND FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS: WHAT, WHERE AND HOW?

Fire safety and the ageing population. René Hagen, professor of Fire Safety Fire Service Academy, Netherlands European Fire Safety Alliance

Increasing Fire Safety of Cologne Main Station by High Pressure Water Mist

Development of IFC based fire safety assesment tools

Objective based approach

Course Outline Cover Page

Kensington Aldridge Academy, London W10

Construction Innovation Center Building 186

Conducting a NFPA 652 Dust Hazard Analysis (DHA): Practical Tips & Approaches

MASTER COURSE OUTLINE

Some Important Aspects of Fire Safety Regulations about High Rise Buildings

Narrative Reports As Regulated by 780 CMR, Section 903.0

Virtual Compartment: An Alternative Approach to Means of Egress Design in Airport Pedestrian Tunnel

STATE FIRE MARSHAL S REQUIRED FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS NARRATIVE REPORT

Fire safety engineering applied to high-rise building facades

SKILL VERIFICATION BOOK FIREFIGHTER I MODULE II FIRE PROTECTION BUREAU. Assigned to: Name:

Fire Safety Management

Will Clay Spring 2014

The Singapore Fire safety Engineering Guidelines (SFEG)

Fire Resistance - Implications for regulations and standards of the September 11th terrorist attacks on the world trade centre Tom Lennon, FRS, BRE

Fire Engineering in High Rise 15 November 2013

Potential Impact of New UL Fire Test Criteria

Simple Equations for Predicting Smoke Filling Time in Fire Rooms with Irregular Ceilings

ANALYSIS OF SMOKE MOVEMENT IN A BUILDING VIA ELEVATOR SHAFTS

REGULATORY REFORM (FIRE SAFETY) ORDER 2005 PERIODIC REVIEW OF FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT

New Approaches to Design for Fire Safety - Residential sprinklers, open plan flat layouts and water mist

( )

IMO UNIFIED INTERPRETATIONS TO SOLAS CHAPTER II-2 AND RELATED FIRE TEST PROCEDURES

Fire Protection System and Life Safety Evaluation of Building X. Anthony W. Sublett

First Revision No NFPA [ Global Input ] Submitter Information Verification. Committee Statement

CHOOSING A FIRE VENTILATION STRATEGY FOR AN UNDERGROUND METRO STATION

A New Zealand Case Study Building Design 11 th International Conference on Performance

Loss Prevention Standards

Collection of Data on Fire and Collapse, Faculty of Architecture Building, Delft University of Technology

Third Runway Project APM Depot Fire Engineering Design. Presented by Ir Wilson Sau-kit TSANG

FRS 201. Firefighters Advanced Skills I. 45 clock hours 3 credit bouts

Anatomy of a Fire. Christopher Crivello, MSFPE, PE. Douglas Nadeau, MSFPE, PE, CFPS, LEED AP

Saving lives with coatings

Fire precautions in dwellings

1 Pre-Burn Plan Mandatory. 2 Pre-Burn Inspection Mandatory. 3 Pre-Burn Briefing Mandatory. 4 Instructor In Charge Mandatory

CHILD CARE CENTER INSPECTION CHECKLIST 06C

Fire evacuation drill

Smoke Management in High-Rise Structures

SOCIETY OF FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERS POSITION STATEMENT P THE ENGINEER AND THE TECHNICIAN DESIGNING FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS.

Modelling Concepts for the Risk-cost Assessment Model FIRECAMTM and its Application to a Canadian Government Office Building

Qualification Specification Highfield Level 1 Award in the Principles of Fire Safety Awareness (RQF)

Fire Alarm Systems Design. incorporating Amendment No.2. a guide to BS5839. Part1:2002

Fire Hazard Analysis of Technical Area 53 Building 1

Case Study 2 (Production and Storage Buildings) - Spain

Generator Addendum to Heather Haven ALF CEMP Plan

Unit 2 Fire Safety (Zone 2)

Hot Issues in Fire Engineering July 2014

DCN: ENGINE COMPANY OPERATIONS CHAPTER 4 March 15, 1997 FIRE SCENE OPERATIONS

CHAPTER 61G15-32 RESPONSIBILITY RULES OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS CONCERNING THE DESIGN OF FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS

DS/EN DK NA:2011

Air Conditioning for Industrial and Commercial Buildings

Sandwell Valley School and Sandwell Community Care Trust Training. 150 Birmingham Road, West Bromwich, B70 6QT

Toxicological analysis of the Rosepark care home fire and effects on occupants. Prof. David Purser Hartford Environmental Research

FIRE PREVENTION PLAN EMERGENCY ACTION

SAMPLE FIRE SAFETY PLAN. ABC Manufacturing Ltd. 123 Main Street Steinbach, Manitoba. Prepared by: John Smith Last reviewed: Bill Jones 2014

Title: BFST1505 Syllabus

IJsbrand van Straalen, Ph.D. Senior scientist TNO The Netherlands

Fire Safety Regulations

Transcription:

Date: 27-06-2017 Place: Technical University of Denmark Knowledge FOr Resilient society

11B25 Smoke and temperature ACTION 11B04 11B12 fire development 11B01 Evacuation human behaviour building response Fire resistance PEOPLE STRUCTURE

prevention protection robustness Limit ignition sources People evacuation and rescue 11B12 active Detect and suppress fire Evacuate smoke and heat PEOPLE F L A S H O V E R passive Maintain functionality Prevent element failures Preserve fire compartments STRUCTURE Prevent collapse propagation 11B01

Education: MIB (Master I Brandsikkerhed ECTS points: 5 Work load: 280 hours Lectures: 27 hours (3 modules of 1 ½ day each) Duration: August - November + examination in January Teachers: Luisa Giuliani (fire, course responsible) and Christian Kindler (evacuation) Feedback: Report on fire spread (I module) + Report on Evacuation (II module) Evaluation: Report on Final Assigment

STAIRCASE (initial fire, not in the models STAIRS SEPARATED SHOP AREA (not to be considered in the problem) ASSEMBLY ROOM 30 persons evacuation area fire spread STAIRS STAIRS STORAGE fire + 1 persons HALL RECEPTION 7 persons OFFICE 2 persons ASSEMBLY ROOM 20 persons GROUND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR

1. Design 2. Structure 3. Energy/Indoor 4. Foundation 5. Fire 6. ICT/BIM

Group-Work based course 90 students 15 building teams 6 students/team 1 student/subject 6 subject groups

Course Responsible: Head of BD Section Jan Karlshøj ECTS points: 10 Work load: 280 hours Duration: 13 ordinary (4h/week)weeks (September-December) + 3 full time weeks (January) Teachers: 9 (1-2 per subject) Evaluation: Client report (50%) + Subject report (30%) + BIM (25%) + Poster presentation (5%)

[The course aims at giving students] an understanding of integrated building design and the way specialized competences can be used collaboratively within multidisciplinary project teams to create a design that fulfils many functional requirements simultaneously. Going beyond mere analysis of a given construction, students will apply their additional competences to construct solutions to open-ended problems. Students will work in groups to solve realistic design jobs that accurately reflect the demands of the construction industry. Students will also work with digital building design methods. 6 design subjects and 1-2 teacher per subject: Subject 1: Design (architecture) Subject 2: Building structure Subject 3: Building services Subject 4: Geotechnical engineering Subject 5: Fire Safety Subject 6: Project Management and ICT Coordination Group-work based course: - 6 students in each group - Each student is responsible for a subject - All students are responsible for a good integration among subjects and for the final design (partly see evaluation)

A student who has met the objectives of the course will be able to: a. Collaborate with other specialists b. Analyze a client s requirements inspired by System Engineering c. Participate in developing a design management scheme to enable the project team to work together towards common goals and deadlines d. Use 3D object-oriented building models and associated IT tools to develop a detailed design solution e. Integrate various technical requirements into a functional building design that satisfies the client brief f. Produce technical reports documenting the fulfilment of specific functional requirements, such as indoor climate, energy performance, structural performance, fire and safety performance, acoustic performance and constructability g. Justify and defend design decisions h. Develop an outline design and project proposal i. Present a final design to internal assessors j. Recognize the need to develop alternative solutions and iterations in the design process in accordance to System Engineering

SPECIFIC ASSIGNMENTS MAIN TASK To replace a proposal for a hotel and residential building called Lighthouse Building T at the Aarhus waterfront with a project proposal for an office tower. The office tower must comply with the Building Class 2020 requirements according to Danish Building Code 2010. 2-week team contract: team members and subject responsible 5-week memo: main design strategies for each subject 7-week presentation: initial project proposal and design choices - FOR FEEDBACK 13-week report: Part 1: 1 client report + Part 2: 6 subject reports - FOR FEEDBACK 13-week BIM: Building Information Models of the building - FOR FEEDBACK 13 week review: each group review another group s 13-week report - FOR FEEDBACK 3-week report: 1 client report + 6 subject reports for each group - FOR EVALUATION 3-week BIM: Builiding Information Models of the building - FOR EVALUATION 3-week poster: Presentation of the final building design - a kind of oral examination

Fire Safety Strategies prevention protection robustness Limit ignition sources Limit hazardous human behavior Emergency procedure and evacuation Part 1 active Access of rescue service (standpipes, firemen) Smoke and heat Evacuation system F L A S H O V E R passive Part 2 Create fire compartments Prevent damage in the elements Prevent loss of functionality in the building Prevent collapse propagation, once local damages have occurred (e.g. redundancy)

SMOKE MANAGEMENT AND EVACUATION Teacher: Associate Prof. Anne Dederichs Part 1 active Access of rescue service (standpipes, firemen) Smoke and heat Evacuation system protection F L A S H O V E R passive Part 2 Create fire compartments Prevent damage in the elements Prevent loss of functionality in the building STRUCTURAL FIRE SAFETY DESIGN Teacher: Associate Prof. Luisa Giuliani

SMOKE MANAGEMENT AND EVACUATION PRESCRIPTIVE PERFORMANCE- BASED Part 1 active Access of rescue service (standpipes, firemen) Smoke and heat Evacuation system

Ensure evacuation and access of the rescue service. Consider smoke spread, passive and active fire protection and operation and maintenance. In particular: a. For traditional parts of the building you should apply the prescriptive (Eksempelsamling) b. For untraditional parts, you need to proof that people can evacuate without being affected by critical conditions, by selecting relevant scenarios, calculating the ASET and RSET conditions and present an event tree for risk assessment

Performance-based design: TENABILITY CRITERIA (ASET) CRITICAL FIRE SCENARIO EVACUATION TIME (RSET) ESL>1? NO

STRUCTURAL FIRE SAFETY DESIGN ELEMENT DESIGN, STANDARD FIRE ELEMENT DESIGN, PARAMETRIC FIRE GLOBAL RESPONSE, FIRE SCENARIOS passive Part 2 Create fire compartments Prevent damage in the elements Prevent loss of functionality in the building

Design structural elements to resist a fully developed fire in the compartment (Danish parametric curve). 1. Identify critical compartments (high fuel load, low thermal inertia, low ventilation, as well as large/high compartments) 2. Identify critical elements (utilization factor and maximum heating temperature) and at least: - 1 beam, 1 column, 1 floor slab, plus possible key elements for structural robustness 3. Design/verify the critical elements against fire 4. Suggest modification for improvements/optimization

COMPARTMENT PROPERTIES Verification format FIRE CURVE ELEMENT TEMPERATURE STRENGTH DEGRADATION MIN LOAD BEARING CAPACITY > check! REQUIRED LOAD BEARING CAPACITY LOADING Fire model DK parametric curve Thermal model Lumped T (steel) Zone model (R.C.) Structural model Plastic analysis CONDITIONS IN FIRE

Inter-relations between Subj.5 and other subjects Subj. 1: Architectural design - the design of staircases and rescue staircases influences the evacuation time; - the distribution of spaces determines the choice and size of compartments; - the intended destination of usage influences the loads and the resistance class; - the presence of suspended ceiling influences the height of the smoke layer; - type and amount of insulations may be incompatible with aesthetic or architectonic needs.

Inter-relations between Subj.5 and other subjects Sub. 2: Building structure - Consistency with the structural and static scheme used in subj. 2 calculations! - modifications on the element size or material required by fire verifications affect the weight and stiffness of the structure assumed in subj.2 and may therefore require to recalculate the structure for the final design. 3: Building Energy - when designing the pipe system, pay attention fire compartments and possible escape of smoke and fire from holes and venting in the walls; - consider installations for fire extinguishing and overpressure in staircases

Inter-relations between Subj.5 and other subjects Sub. 4: Geotechnical design - Limitations of fire spread and evacuation from the underground parking lot (subj. 5.1); - Boundary conditions of the bottom columns influences subj. 5.2 calculations. Sub. 6: Management - Evacuation strategy: cost for training staff and occupants, alarm maintenance - Active measures: cost of installing and maintaining of the sprinkler system etc. - Passive measures: cost of insulation and sustainability aspect (toxic paint etc.)

TEAM 10 TEAM 3 TEAM 8 TEAM 16

Knowledge FOr Resilient society