SCOPING REPORT. On contract research for ILISO CONSULTING

Similar documents
SOILS AND AGRICULTURAL POTENTIAL FOR THE PROPOSED P166 SERVITUDE, MBOMBELA, MPUMALANGA PROVINCE

SOIL SURVEY OF PORTIONS 81 AND 82 OFTHE FARM VAALBANK 512JQ, NEAR MAGALIESBURG, SOUTH-WEST OF PRETORIA

SOIL SURVEY FOR PROPOSED WET ASH DISPOSAL FACILITY, HENDRINA POWER STATION, MPUMALANGA PROVINCE

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION

The entire site supports grass on which sheep had been grazing recently.

PROPOSED OPEN CAST COAL SITE SEPTEMBER 1992

Report on a soil survey and agricultural suitability investigation of the property known as Erf 660, De Doorns.

PHYSICAL CHAtlACTERISTICS REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED SAND AND GRAVEL SITE AT MANOR FARM, UFFINGTON

STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION

Environmental Impact Assessment for KPSX: Weltevreden

PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS REPORT INCORPORATING AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION LAND AT BOLE INGS, WESTBURTON, NOTTINGHAMSHIRE (SK805875)

MAFF Ministry of Ifinil Agriculture Rsheries and Food

If A rr Ministry of. IfiriEI. Agriculture Fisheries and Food

STAFFORDSHIRE AND STOKE-ON- TRENT STRUCTURE PLAN Site 7: Priory Farm. Agricultural Land Classification ALC Map and Report November 1998

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION SEMI-DETAILED SURVEY EGG FARM KINGS LANGLEY HERTFORDSHIRE

STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION WITTON PARK, COUNTY DURHAM PROPOSED QUARRY EXTENSION DECEMBER 1992

ACRE NOOK EAST QUARRY, CHELFORD, CHESHIRE. Statement of Site Physical Characteristics January 1998

MAFF I^inistry of IfiriEE Agriculture Fisheries and Food

Environmental Regulatory Processes relating to the amendment of the Environmental Management Programme for its Elandsfontein Operations

Explaining a Soil Profile

SOIL SURVEY REPORT ON SENCE de LIEU, PAARL

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION KNOWSLEY UDP, SITE 45.01

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS

LAND NORTH OF TAMWORTH. Agricultural Land Classification ALC Map and Report April 1998

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND SOIL PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS LAND NEAR SHIRE HILL FARM SAFFRON WALDEN ESSEX

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND STATEMENT OF SOIL PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS EXTENSION TO CLOUD HILL QUARRY, BREEDON ON THE HILL, LEICESTERSHIRE

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION GREAT GRIMSBY LOCAL PLAN SITE AG 2. GREAT COATES AUGUST 1993

Agricultural Land Classification and Statement of Physical Characteristics Higbfield Farm Whitley Bridge North Yorkshire October 1996

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION

Tools to facilitate the use of Soil Maps in Emilia-Romagna region (Italy) Paola Tarocco

List of Equipment, Tools, Supplies, and Facilities:

6 Athlone Street Tel: SWELLENDAM Cell:

SUMMARY. alcholnie.doc\ih\jk

2012 FINAL SOILS AREA 2 Envirothon Questions Answer KEY

Explaining a Soil Profile

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND SOIL PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS BIRCH PIT, NEAR COLCHESTER ESSEX

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION REPORT LAND AT BRANT FARM, STOURPORT-ON-SEVERN

Annex 5D. Soil, Land Use and Land Capability Report compiled by TerraAfrica Consult, April 2015

HAVE YOU NOTICED at construction sites how a

PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS REPORT INCORPORATING AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS

Explaining a Soil Profile

Humisphere SOIL RECONNAISSANCE MISSION TO 3 ESTATES IN TANZANIA. Ir. J.H.M. (Hans) Scholten

APPENDIX D. Slope Stability Analysis Results for Soil and Overburden Storage Mounds

M AFT Ministry of Ifin&l. Agriculture Rsheries and Food

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION VULCAN VILLAGE (PROPOSED GOLF COURSE) ST HELENS MBC

CAVIL HEAD OCCS ACKLINGTON NOVEMBER 1997

HUMBLEBURN OCCS, CRAGHEAD, COUNTY DURHAM SURVEY OF RESTORED LAND OCTOBER RPT Job Number: 73/97 MAFF Reference: EL LURET Job Number: ME3RTP

Also available on the web at

AGRICULTURAL USE & QUALITY OF LAND NEAR MINDALE HOUSE PRESTATYN. Report 762/1

Land Capability Classifications

P/2014/00830 Received 27/06/2014 SOIL RESOURCES AND AGRICULTURAL USE & QUALITY OF LAND AT ROLLESTON PARK FARM TUTBURY, STAFFORDSHIRE.

CORNFORTH EAST QUARRY COUNTY DURHAM

EXPERIMENT 6 PREPARATION OF LAND CAPABILITY CLASS MAP

STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OLDWICK FARM, WEST LAVANT, WEST SUSSEX

New horse training area, Manor Farm, Great Kimble, Buckinghamshire

MAFF Ministry of iflmll Agriculture Fisheries and Food

2014 Iowa FFA Soil Judging CDE Exam


Request for a Scoping Opinion by Provectus. Proposed Surface Mining of Coal on Land west off the A61, Hill Top Farm, Clay Cross, Derbyshire

HINCKLEY AND BOSWORTH LOCAL PLAN Land south of Earl Shilton - Site G Agricultural Land Classification February 1997

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION AND STATEMENT OF SOIL PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS TYTTENHANGER QUARRY EXTENSION, LONDON COLNEY, HERTFORDSHIRE

CB1 Moderately undulating landscape with slight gilgai (few inches) formation: broad ridge tops and upper slopes of moderately shallow grey cracking

Relationship of Soil Moisture and Drainage Conditions to Tree Decline in Avocado Orchards *

Agricultural Potential Assessment for the proposed Vlakvarkfontein Coal Mine. Mpumalanga, South Africa

Muswellbrook Coal Company No.1 Open Cut Extension Soil Study

REPORT. Soil, Land Capability and Land Use Assessment Report for the Proposed New Vaal Colliery Life Extension Project.

SOIL RESOURCES REPORT HALVERGATE MARSHES, NORFOLK 1. BACKGROUND

ADy^S. Whelpley Farm, Whiteparish, Wiltshire. Resource Plaiming Team Taunton Statutory Unit. November 93

SOILS AND AGRICULTURAL USE & QUALITY OF LAND OFF HOLT ROAD, ROSSETT. Report 1067/1

SINGITA SWENI LODGE EXPANSION: SUMMARY REPORT - BAR

EXAMPLE Point A: Sandy Loam: 65% Sand _ 20% Silt _ 15% Clay. Point B: %Sand % Silt % Clay. Point C: %Sand % Silt % Clay. Point D: %Sand % Silt % Clay

REDZ & POWER CORRIDOR GAZETTING. 25 July Environmental Advisory Services

ARC- SOIL, CLIMATE AND WATER

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF WINDSOR Office of the City Solicitor Planning Department

Grade. % of Survey Area 1. Staplehay. 2 3a. 3a 3b Non Ag Organ Ag Bldgs. 1 Non Ag Urban

Examining soils in the field. Examining soils in the field. Environment Agency thinksoils examining soils in the field

APPENDIX 1: SCOPED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (EIS) FORM

BREEDON NORTHERN LIMITED

Chapter 4 - Preparation of Stormwater Site Plans

Alternative Crop Suitability Methodology

Soils, Land Capability, and Land Use Assessment for the Environmental Impact Assessment for Lanxess Chrome Mining

NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION LEEDS AND LANGLEY BY-PASS, KENT

LAB 12: Soils. Name School. Patrich Physical Geography Lab 1

Understanding Growing Media Components

Soil is a Natural Resource. February 12, 2015

Hydrologic Assessment of using Low Impact Development to Mitigate the Impacts of Climate Change. Chris Jensen, AScT Master of Science Thesis

Archaeological Investigation in advance of Development at 2 Palace Cottages, Charing Palace, Charing, Kent

3.0 Cumulative Scenario and Methodology. 3.0 Cumulative Scenario and Methodology

Unit II Soil Management

Appendix 3A Soil augering descriptions: land type Pediment

BLACK/HARMONY/FAREWELL CREEK WATERSHED EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT CHAPTER 5 IMPERVIOUS SURFACES

APPENDIX D PUBLIC NOTIFICATIONS

Visual Impact Assessment - December Figure 5.2: Viewshed analysis of the haul route.

Girtridge Monitor Farm Meeting

Strategic Environmental Assessment Screening Report. Dublin Port Masterplan Review 2017

Brine Generation Study

Investigation into soil texture in my area

2016 Area 3 Envirothon Muskingum County Soils Test ANSWER KEY

Transcription:

SCOPING REPORT On contract research for ILISO CONSULTING Proposed Construction of a 65 MW Photovoltaic Power Plant, Duvha Power Station, Mpumalanga Province Soils and Agricultural Potential Scoping Study By D.G. Paterson (Pr. Sci. Nat. 400463/04) Report Number GW/A/2014/xx January 2015 ARC-Institute for Soil, Climate and Water, Private Bag X79, Pretoria 0001, South Africa Tel (012) 310 2500 Fax (012) 323 1157 1

DECLARATION I hereby declare that I am qualified to compile this report as a registered Natural Scientist and that I am independent of any of the parties involved and that I have compiled an impartial report, based solely on all the information available. D G Paterson January 2015 2

CONTENTS Page 1. TERMS OF REFERENCE 4 2. SITE CHARACTERISTICS 5 3. METHODOLOGY 6 4. SOILS 7 5. AGRICULTURAL POTENTIAL 9 6. IMPACTS 9 7. CONCLUSION 10 REFERENCES 10 APPENDIX A: MAP OF LAND TYPES 3

1. TERMS OF REFERENCE The ARC-Institute for Soil, Climate and Water (ARC-ISCW) was contracted by Iliso Consulting to undertake a soil investigation near Witbank (emalahleni), in Mpumalanga Province. The purpose of the investigation is to contribute to the scoping phase of the Environmental Impact assessment (EIA) process for a proposed Photovoltaic (PV) power generation facility at Eskom s Duvha Power Station. Scoping Report The scoping report must include:» a description of the environment that may be affected by the activity and the manner in which the environment may be affected by the proposed project» a description and evaluation of environmental issues and potential impacts (including direct, indirect and cumulative impacts) that have been identified» Direct, indirect and cumulative impacts of the identified issues must be evaluated within the Scoping Report in terms of the following criteria: what will be affected and how it will be affected; (limited to the immediate area or site of development), regional, national or international» a statement regarding the potential significance of the identified issues based on the evaluation of the issues/impacts» identification of potentially significant impacts to be assessed within the EIA phase and details of the methodology to be adopted in assessing these impacts. The objectives of the study are; To obtain all existing soil information and to produce a soil map of the specified area as well as To assess broad agricultural potential. 4

2. SITE CHARACTERISTICS 2.1 Location The area that was investigated, on portions of the farms Speekfontein 336JS and Rhenosterfontein 318JS, lies approximately 15 km south-east of Witbank, adjacent to the Duvha Power Station. The position of the site is shown by the green areas on the map in Figure 1. The area lies between 25 o 55 and 25 o 58 S and between 29 o 19 and 29 o 22 E. Figure 1 Locality map Of the various areas that were identified, four areas are adjacent to the Power Station, while two areas lie further north, north of the ash disposal facility at Duvha (see map in Appendix A). 2.2 Terrain The site has gentle slopes toward the west and north-west, with slopes of less than 5%, and lies at a height of approximately 1 500 to 1 600 metres above sea level. 5

The area is situated close to two watercourses (especially in the north), so potentially wet areas may well be present. 2.3 Climate The climate of the study area (Koch, 1987) can be regarded as warm to mild, with rain in summer and dry winters. The long-term average annual rainfall in this region is 680 mm, of which 578.8 mm, or 85%, falls from November to April. The total annual evaporation is approximately 1 925 mm per year, peaking at approximately 7.0 mm per day in December. Temperatures vary from an average monthly maximum and minimum of 27.0ºC and 13.8ºC for January to 17.5ºC and -0.8 o C for July respectively. The extreme high temperature that has been recorded is 38.9 o C and the extreme low 13.3ºC. Frost occurs most years on around 57 days on average between mid-may and mid September. 2.4 Parent Material The geology of the area comprises sandstone of the Vryheid Formation, Ecca Group (Geological Survey, 1978). 3. METHODOLOGY Existing soil information was obtained from the map sheet 2528 Pretoria (Schoeman et al., 1978) from the national Land Type Survey, published at a scale of 1:250 000. A land type is defined as an area with a uniform terrain type, macroclimate and broad soil pattern. The soils are classified according to MacVicar et al (1977). The areas under investigation (as shown in white on the map in Appendix A) are covered by two one land type, namely: Ba4 (Mainly red, highly weathered, structureless plinthic soils) Fa8 (Mainly shallow soils with no lime, and some rock) The land type boundary is shown by the yellow line in Appendix A. 6

It should be clearly noted that, since the information contained in the land type survey is of a reconnaissance nature, only the general dominance of the soils in the landscape can be given, and not the actual areas of occurrence within a specific land type. Also, other soils that were not identified due to the scale of the land type survey may also occur. The site was not visited during the course of this study, and so the detailed composition of the specific land types has not been ground-truthed. A summary of the dominant soil characteristics of the land types is given in Table 1 below. The distribution of soils with high, medium and low agricultural potential within each land type is also given, with the dominant class shown in bold type. 4. SOILS A summary of the dominant soil characteristics is given in Table 1 below. 7

Land Type Ba4 Table 1 Depth (mm) 900-1200 600-1200 Land types occurring (with soils in order of dominance) Dominant soils Percent Characteristics of land type Hutton 14/15/16 36% Red, structureless, sandy loam to sandy clay loam soils on weathering rock Avalon/Glencoe 14/16 20% Brown to yellow-brown, structureless, sandy loam to sandy clay loam soils on mottled, soft or hard plinthite Agric. Potential (%) High: 55.6 Mod: 30.1 Low: 14.3 Fa8 300-1000 300-600 100-450 Longlands 21/ Cartref 21/31 Hutton/Clovelly 26 Mispah 10/11 16% 36% 31% Brown to grey-brown, structureless bleached sandy loam soils on mottled soft plinthite or weathering rock Red and yellow-brown, structureless, sandy loam to sandy clay loam soils on weathering rock Brown to grey-brown, structureless sandy loam to sandy clay loam topsoils on rock or hard plinthite High: 0.0 Mod: 9.5 Low: 90.5 - Rock 25% 8

5. AGRICULTURAL POTENTIAL The area comprises a mixture of soils, mainly non-structured, with some variable depth (as can be seen from the information contained in Table 1). The high rainfall in the area (Section 2.3) means that rain-fed cultivation can be successfully practiced on suitable soils. The landscape represented by land type Ba4 is dominated by soils with high (occasionally moderate) agricultural potential, with very few low potential soils, However, the area covered by land type Fa8 is predominantly low potential, generally due to shallow soil depth and occasional rockiness. For this reason, more detailed survey investigation would be required to delineate the areas of the various soil types. This would involve carrying out a systematic soil survey of the area or areas selected as viable alternatives, using a hand-held soil auger at a grid of investigation of 150 x 150 m. Samples of topsoil and subsoil from representative soils will be collected and analyzed, so that the soils occurring can be mapped and characterized for the grade of agricultural potential. A detailed soil map and report will be prepared, with all relevant soil-related information. 6. IMPACTS The major impact on the natural resources of the study area would be the loss of arable land due to the construction of the various types of infrastructure. With the possibility of moderate to high potential agricultural soils in the vicinity, this impact would in all probability have a degree of significance, although local in extent. At the end of the project life, it is anticipated that removal of the structures would enable the land to be returned to more or less a natural state following rehabilitation, with little impact. The impact can be summarized as follows: Table 3 Nature of impact Extent of impact Impact significance Loss of agricultural land Site only Land that is no longer able to be utilized due to construction of infrastructure Confined to areas within the site where infrastructure will be located 9

7. CONCLUSION The area investigated is comprised of a variety of soils, but with a significant percentage of shallow soils. The area can be considered as having mainly high potential for agricultural purposes, taking into consideration the annual rainfall. The soil information used in this report is based on a reconnaissance scale survey, revealing only broad soil patterns. If more detail on the soil patterns is required, then a soil survey (see Section 5) will be necessary to determine the detailed soil patterns that might not be obvious in this report. However, since the property is owned and operated by Eskom, the use of the land for agricultural production would not likely be an option for future development and therefore not accounted for as a loss. 10

REFERENCES Geological Survey, 1978. 1:250 000 scale geological map 2528 Pretoria. Department of Mineral and Energy Affairs, Pretoria. Koch, F.G.L., 1987. Climate data. In: Land types of the maps 2526 Rustenburg and 2528 Pretoria. Mem. Agric. nat. Res. S. Afr. No. 8. Department of Agriculture and Water Supply, Pretoria. MacVicar, C.N., de Villiers, J.M., Loxton, R.F, Verster, E., Lambrechts, J.J.N., Merryweather, F.R., le Roux, J., van Rooyen, T.H. & Harmse, H.J. von M., 1977. Soil classification. A binomial system for South Africa. ARC-Institute for Soil, Climate & Water, Pretoria. Schoeman, J.L., Meldal-Johnson, A., Fitzpatrick, R.W. & Verster, E., 1978. Land types of the map 2528 Pretoria. Field information. Mem. Nat. Agric. Res. S. Afr. No. 8. ARC-Institute for Soil, Climate and Water, Pretoria. 11

APPENDIX A MAP OF LAND TYPES 12

13