Lower Don River West Remedial Flood Protection Project TABLE OF CONTENTS. Page. Executive Summary

Similar documents
Vaughan Metropolitan Centre (VMC) Black Creek Renewal CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

Draft Rhode Island Stormwater Design and Installation Standards Manual

Ashbridges Bay Erosion and Sediment Control Project

Rapid Transit Implementation Working Group September 14, 2017

Commissioners Road West Realignment Environmental Assessment

Case Study Presentation of the Downtown Brampton Flood Protection Class EA

The MSII reports for the bridge indicate that the Annual Average Daily Traffic at the bridge is 100. The road can be considered a low volume road.

Scarborough Waterfront Project

1. Introduction

Public Information Centre No. 1 King-Vaughan Road Bridge Replacement Municipal Class Environmental Assessment City of Vaughan

St. Clair Avenue West Area Transportation Master Plan

Environmental Assessment

City of Toronto. Emery Village Transportation Master Plan

CHECKLIST FOR PHASE II DRAINAGE REPORT

WELCOME TO OPEN HOUSE TWO November 28, 2018

AMENDMENT NO. 30 TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE TOWN OF MILTON

Bostwick Road. Municipal Class Environmental Assessment. October 13, City of London. Bostwick Road Municipal Class Environmental Assessment

Summary of Changes for the Comprehensive Draft Proposed Official Plan Amendment

Mavis Road Class Environmental Assessment

APPENDIX L3. Table of Contents. SWP EA Information Sheets

NYC DEP s Approach to Flood Mitigation: The Local Flood Analysis (LFA) Process

ENBRIDGE GAS DISTRIBUTION INC. Proposed Relocation for Ninth Line, Markham and Whitchurch-Stouffville. Environmental Screening Report

APPENDIX K WINDSOR OFFICIAL PLAN

MEMORANDUM. September 10, 2018

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF WINDSOR Office of the City Solicitor Planning Department

South Bismarck Watershed Model Update and Stormwater Improvement Project

GEOMETRIC IMPROVEMENTS AND WATERMAIN LOOPING MUNICIPAL CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

4. Contractor (and subcontractors if applicable) certification statement(s)

M4 Corridor around Newport Environmental Statement Volume 3: Appendices

Presentation to Parks and Open Space Advisory. Committee September 22, 2016

Portage Parkway Environmental Assessment Public Information Centre No. 1

WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON

Bostwick Road. Municipal Class Environmental Assessment. Public Information Centre #2 June 14, City of London

Burloak Drive Grade Separation

Population, Housing, and Employment Analysis

East River Waterfront Esplanade and Piers New York, New York Draft Environmental Impact Statement

Better Cycling. The City will update the cycling master plan (London ON Bikes) based on the approved BRT network.

Commissioners Road West Realignment Environmental Assessment

Highway 427 Industrial Secondary Plan Area 47 Schedule C Class Environmental Assessment For Arterial Roadways

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page

When planning stormwater management facilities, the following principles shall be applied where possible.

Heritage Road Improvements from Steeles Avenue to Rivermont Road

Appendix E Preliminary Location Hydraulic Study

Master Environmental Servicing Plan & Secondary Plan

Background Summary Report

Development Permit Application Form. Property Owner Information as Registered on Legal Title Property Owner Name: Phone:

Public Meeting #3 May 9, 2009 MVVA Team

WELCOME DOWNTOWN BRAMPTON FLOOD PROTECTION. Environmental Assessment Project DOWNTOWN BRAMPTON FLOOD PROTEC TION - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

Edgeley Pond + Park Public Meeting

July 9, Adèle Labbé Environmental Planner City of Guelph 1 Carden Street Guelph, Ontario N1H 3A1. Dear Ms. Labbé.

Purpose of Open House #3

The Napa River Flood Protection Project

Edward R. Sajecki Commissioner of Planning and Building

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 15, 2016

City of East Point Comprehensive Floodplain Management Program

FAQ S about Restoration Planning FROM THE Department of Ecology WEBSITE:

Environmental Study Report

WELCOME! 8 8:30 6: TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS. Open House. Presentation & Q&A

Blackfriars Bridge Municipal Class Environmental Assessment. Public Information Centre #1 November 19 th, 2014

Meeting Agenda. City of Guelph. River Systems Advisory Committee. Agenda Items. Item 1, 2 and 3. Item 4 Ward to Downtown Pedestrian Bridge

COUNCIL ATTACHMENT 2 HIGHWAY 7 CORRIDOR AND VAUGHAN NORTH-SOUTH LINK

SCARBOROUGH SUBWAY EXTENSION. Scarborough Subway Extension. Final Terms of Reference

PREPARED FOR: PLATTEVIEW ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

7th Avenue Creek Master Plan Development Project. City of St. Charles, IL. IAFSM CONFERENCE March 14, 2018 MARKET

SECTION 1 Introduction...1. SECTION 2 Regional Context Criteria for Planning Districts Description of Planning District...

Rapid Transit Implementation Working Group

Existing Conditions and Environmental Consequences Floodplains

Cumberland Comprehensive Plan Town Council adopted August 2003, State adopted June 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS

3 Development Process 3.1 Stage One page Stage Two page Stage Three page CENTRAL PICKERING DEVELOPMENT PLAN

TOWN OF WHITBY REPORT RECOMMENDATION REPORT

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Transportation Chapter 1 - Introduction and Purpose of Planning to 1-3. Utilities

Feasibility Analysis for Expansion of the Provincial Greenbelt Plan Area into Mississauga

WELCOME TO OPEN HOUSE # 3

Modeling Cumulative LID Features for Floodplain Impacts in an Urban Watershed in Houston, TX

CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE WHITEBELT VISIONING EXERCISE ADDENDUM TO THE GTA WEST LAND USE STUDY WORK PROGRAM

Upper Smith Creek Comprehensive Development Plan (File: CDP 14-01) TERMS OF REFERENCE

City of Cornwall Municipal Class Environmental Assessment. Proposed Improvement and Extension of Lemay Street

Elfrida Growth Area Study

Alternative Routes. St. Vital to La Verendrye Station - Southern Loop Transmission Corridor. 20 different segments 4 segments common to all routes

I. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION... 1 A. General Description... 1 B. Historical Resume and Project Status... 2 C. Cost Estimates...

A Guide to Open Space Design Development in Halifax Regional Municipality

The purpose of tonight s PIC is to:

Red Hill Valley Project More Than A Road October 16, 2006

Public Information Centre #1

Municipal Class EA Study Public Information Centre No. 1 December 13, :00 pm 7:00 pm. Please sign in so we can keep you updated on this study

Second Line West Pedestrian/Cyclist Crossing of Highway 401 Class EA. Second Line West Pedestrian/Cyclist Crossing of Highway 401 Class EA

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Introduction

~!VAUGHAN NOV Z November 21, Mr. Denis Kelly, Regional Clerk The Regional Municipality of York Yonge Street Newmarket, ON L3Y 6Z1

HURON COMMUNITY PLAN

Your town s subdivision or land use ordinance standards should reference the following street standards, for example:

Southwest Fleetwood Enclave

SUBJECT: Proposed Downtown Mobility Hub Precinct Plan and Proposed Official Plan Policies

TOWN OF AURORA HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS AND CONSERVATION PLANS GUIDE

SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR EXTENSION. Environmental Evaluation and Basic Engineering Results PUBLIC MEETING/OPEN HOUSE November 18, 2009

City of Norfolk Coastal Flood Mitigation Program. March 13, 2013

City Of Owen Sound. 10th Street Bridge Evaluation - Schedule 'C' Environmental Study Report. Version 2 (Phase 3) GMBP File: June 26, 2018

GLEN ROAD PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STUDY PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE #2 OCTOBER 24, 2017

The University of Vermont #AMPUSª-ASTERª0LAN. & Design Guidelines. May 2006

Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE

Appendix K. Stormwater Management Plan

Transcription:

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Executive Summary 1.0 INTRODUCTION...1-1 1.1 Purpose of the Undertaking...1-1 1.2 Study Area Description...1-1 1.3 Description of the Undertaking...1-1 1.4 Rationale for the Undertaking...1-2 2.0 BACKGROUND...2-1 2.1 History of the Problem...2-1 2.2 Overview of Previous Studies...2-3 2.3 Conservation Authority Involvement Justification...2-5 2.4 Concurrent and Related Studies...2-8 3.0 PUBLIC AND AGENCY CONSULTATION...3-1 3.1 Consultation History...3-1 3.2 Public & Agency Notifications...3-1 3.3 Information Releases...3-2 3.4 Open Houses/Workshops...3-3 3.5 Community Liaison Committee...3-3 3.6 Technical Advisory Committee...3-4 3.7 Summary of Issues and Concerns...3-5 3.7.1 Public Information Centre No. 1 January 19, 2004...3-5 3.7.2 Public Information Centre No. 2 April 29, 2004...3-5 3.7.3 Public Information Centre No. 3 September 21, 2004...3-2 3.7.4 Mississaugas of New Credit First Nation...3-2 3.7.5 Ontario Mile Corporation Raceway...3-3 4.0 DESCRIPTION OF LOWER DON...4-1 4.1 The Don River Watershed...4-1 4.2 Lower Don River Flooding - A Historical Perspective...4-4 4.3 Physiographic Description...4-5 4.4 Baseline Studies...4-6 4.5 Hydrologic/Hydraulic Characterization...4-6 4.5.1 Hydrologic Analyses...4-6 4.5.2 Hydraulic Analysis...4-8 4.6 Aquatic Investigations...4-9 4.6.1 General...4-9 4.6.2 Fish Community Assessment...4-12 4.6.3 Water Temperature Survey...4-13 4.6.4 Benthic Invertebrate Sampling...4-13 4.6.5 Water Chemistry Monitoring...4-14 4.7 Terrestrial Natural Heritage...4-14 4.7.1 Terrestrial Attributes...4-14 4.7.2 Avian Migratory Stopover and Corridor Evaluation...4-16 4.8 Cultural Resources...4-16 4.8.1 Built Heritage...4-16 i

4.8.2 Archaeology...4-18 4.9 Socio-Economic & Land Use...4-19 4.9.1 Existing Land Use...4-19 4.9.2 Methodology...4-22 4.9.3 Flood Damage Assessment...4-23 4.10 Topography, Soils, Groundwater and Soil Contamination...4-24 4.11 Existing Infrastructure...4-25 4.11.1 Utility Lines...4-25 4.11.2 Rail Infrastructure...4-25 5.0 EXAMINATION OF ALTERNATIVES...5-1 5.1 Approach Overview......5-1 5.2 Description of Long List of Alternatives...5-1 5.2.1 Do Nothing...5-1 5.2.2 Flood Policy Revision...5-1 5.2.3 Flood Protection Landform with East Bank Works & Culvert...5-2 5.2.4 Flood Protection Landform with East Bank Works (No culvert)...5-3 5.2.5 Wedge with East Bank Works &Culvert...5-4 5.2.6 Wedge & East Bank Works...5-4 5.2.7 CN Rail Bridge & Channel Widening...5-4 5.2.8 Secondary Channel with Flood Protection Landform...5-5 5.2.9 Floodwall/Dyke...5-6 5.2.10 Upstream Storage...5-6 5.2.11 Floodproofing of Individual Structures...5-7 5.2.12 River Dredging...5-7 5.2.13 Watershed Conservation Measures...5-8 5.3 Screening of Alternatives......5-8 5.4 Evaluation of Alternatives and Selection of Preferred Alternative...5-15 5.4.1 Physical Assessment Group...5-15 5.4.2 Biological Assessment Group...5-29 5.4.3 Cultural Assessment Group...5-29 5.4.4 Socio-Economic Assessment Group...5-30 5.4.5 Engineering/Technical Assessment Group...5-31 5.4.6 Cost Assessment Group...5-31 5.4.7 Comparative Evaluation...5-33 5.4.8 Summary of Evaluation...5-35 6.0 FUNCTIONAL DESIGN & ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT...6-1 6.1 General...6-1 6.2 Refinement of the Preferred Alternative...6-1 6.2.1 Hydro One Networks Plant...6-1 6.2.2 Geo-Environmental/Geotechnical Investigations...6-3 6.2.3 Bridge Extension Option for Additional Hydraulic Capacity (Selected as Preferred Option)...6-9 6.3 Project Description...6-9 6.4 Design Requirements for the Flood Protection Landform...6-9 6.4.1 Provincial Context...6-9 6.4.2 Details of the Flood Protection Landform...6-13 6.4.3 Grading Considerations...6-17 6.4.4 Landform Composition...6-18 6.4.5 Construction Considerations...6-19 6.4.6 Traffic Effects...6-19 ii

6.4.7 Stormwater Management...6-20 6.4.8 Utility Relocation...6-20 6.4.9 Integration with West Don Lands Precinct Plan...6-23 6.5 Details of the Remedial Works at the CN Rail Embankment...6-24 6.5.1 General...6-24 6.5.2 Multi-Cell Culvert Option...6-24 6.5.3 Bridge Extension Option...6-36 6.5.4 Identification of Preferred Option (Bridge Extension) for the CN Rail Embankment...6-40 6.6 East Bank Retaining Wall/Dykes...6-45 6.7 Keating Channel Dredging...6-47 6.8 Modifications to the Enbridge Utility Bridge...6-48 6.9 Cost...6-49 6.10 Assessment of Effects and Benefits...6-50 6.10.1 Physical Environment...6-50 6.10.2 Biological...6-77 6.10.3 Cultural...6-78 6.10.4 Land Use/Socio-Economic...6-80 6.10.5 Engineering/Technical...6-82 6.11 Mitigation Strategy...6-83 6.12 Project Monitoring...6-83 6.12.1 Construction Monitoring...6-83 6.12.2 Operation Monitoring...6-83 6.13 Landscape Plan...6-87 6.13.1 Planting Zones...6-87 6.13.2 Demonstration Plan...6-92 6.14 Pedestrian Circulation and Access...6-93 7.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS...7-1 7.1 Preferred Remedial Flood Protection Alternative...7-1 7.2 Baseline Inventories...7-2 7.3 Environmental Effects of the Flood Remediation Project...7-2 7.4 Mitigation Plan...7-3 7.5 Final Design & Implementation Considerations...7-3 7.6 Other Considerations...7-5 Bibliography iii

List of Tables Table 4.1 - Summary of Summary of Calculated Peak Flows (Future Land Use)...4-7 Table 4.2 - Comparison of Calculated Flows Hurricane Hazel...4-8 Table 4.3 - Regulatory Flood Levels Along the Lower Don River...4-9 Table 4.4 - Classification of Fish Captured in the Lower Don River...4-12 Table 4.5 - Existing Land Use in Spill Zone 3...4-19 Table 4.6 - Industrial/Commercial/Industrial Flood Damage Values...4-23 Table 4.7 - Flood Damages by Primary Land Use...4-24 Table 4.8 - Study Area Utilities...4-26 Table 5.1 - Screening the Long List of Alternatives...5-10 Table 5.2 - Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives...5-16 Table 5.3 - Ranking of Alternatives...5-26 Table 5.4 - Summary of Alternatives Ranking by Criteria Group...5-34 Table 6.1 - Calculated Hydraulic Conditions for the Regulatory Flood...6-29 Table 6.2 - Weekend Delays to Via Rail Service (No Track Diversion)...6-34 Table 6.3 - Summary of Construction Work Blocks & Associated Impacts on Train Operations for Multi-cell Culvert Option (No Track Diversion)...6-35 Table 6.4 - Preliminary Cost Estimate for Multi-Cell Culvert Option...6-37 Table 6.5 - Construction Sequencing & Time Requirements for Installation of the Bridge Extension Option...6-41 Table 6.6 - Preliminary Cost Estimate for the Bridge Extension Option...6-42 Table 6.7 - Summary of Option Evaluation...6-45 Table 6.8 - Summary of Preliminary Costs...6-49 Table 6.9 - Summary of Effects...6-51 Table 6.10 - Description of Potential Effects...6-54 Table 6.11 - Summary of Mitigation Strategies...6-84 Table 6.12 - Flood Protection Landform Vegetation Zones...6-87 List of Figures Figure 1.1 - Study Area...1-1 Figure 1.2 - -Component Works...1-2 Figure 2.1 - Regulatory Floodplain along the Lower Don River...2-3 Figure 2.2 - Floodwater Depths along the Lower Don River for the Regulatory Flood...2-6 Figure 4.1 - Existing Land Use in the Don River Watershed...4-2 Figure 4.2 - Future Land Use in the Don River Watershed...4-3 Figure 4.3 - Extent of Flooding in the Lower Don River During a Hurricane Hazel Event...4-10 Figure 4.4 - Water Surface Profile Existing Conditions...4-11 Figure 4.5 - Seasonal Distribution of Fish Species in the Lower Don River...4-13 Figure 4.6 - Terrestrial Natural Heritage Study Area and Community Ranks...4-14 Figure 4.7 - Avian Migratory Stopover Evaluation Stations...4-16 Figure 4.8 - Heritage Resources South and East of the Lower Don River...4-17 Figure 4.8 - Existing Land Use...4-20 Figure 4.9 - Official Plan Designation in Spill Zone 3...4-21 Figure 4.10 - Flood Depths in Spill Zone 3...4-22 iv

Figure 5.1 - Flood Protection Landform with Culvert & East Bank Works...5-2 Figure 5.2 - Flood Protection Landform & East Bank Works...5-4 Figure 5.3 - Wedge with Culvert & East Bank Works...5-4 Figure 5.4 - Wedge & East Bank Works...5-5 Figure 5.5 - Secondary Channel with Flood Protection Landform...5-5 Figure 5.6 - Existing & Potential Storage Sites...5-6 Figure 5.7 - Extent of River Dredging...5-7 Figure 6.1 - Location of Hydro One Plant...6-2 Figure 6.2 - Location Plan of Geo Environmental/Geotechnical Investigations...6-5 Figure 6.3 - Generalized Stratigraphy...6-6 Figure 6.4 -, Component Works...6-10 Figure 6.5 - Flood Protection Landform Plan...6-14 Figure 6.6A - Flood Protection Landform Cross-Sections...6-15 Figure 6.6B - Flood Protection Landform Cross-Sections...6-16 Figure 6.7 - Utilities...6-21 Figure 6.8 - CN Rail Crossing of Lower Don River...6-25 Figure 6.9 - General Arrangement Culvert Option at CN Rail Crossing...6-26 Figure 6.10 - Plan Culvert Option at CN Rail Crossing...6-27 Figure 6.11 - HEC-2 Cross Section Numbers & Location...6-30 Figure 6.12 - Construction Staging...6-33 Figure 6.13 - General Arrangement Bridge Option at CN Rail Crossing...6-38 Figure 6.14 - Plan-Bridge Option at CN Rail Crossing (21.3 m Span)...6-39 Figure 6.15 - Remedial Flood Works for the East Bank...6-46 Figure 6.16 - Flooding Depths with in Place...6-75 Figure 6.17 - Flood Protection Landform Vegetation Zones...6-88 Figure 6.18 - Flood Protection Landform Vegetation Zones (Section View)...6-88 Figure 6.19 - Demonstration Plan...6-92 Figure 6.20 - Demonstration Plan (Section View)...6-93 Figure 6.21 - Potential Trail Concept Plan...6-93 List of Appendices Appendix A... Public Information Centre Material Appendix B... Mississaugas of the New Credit Appendix C...Correspondence with Stakeholders Appendix D... Hydraulic Modelling Details Appendix E...Aquatic Investigations Appendix F... Terrestrial Natural Heritage Appendix G...Cultural Heritage Appendix H...Geo-Environmental Study Appendix I... Rail Transportation Study Appendix J... Geo-Environmental and Geotechnical Field Investigations Appendix K...Report on Alternatives for the East Bank v