LONDON BRIDGE STATION ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY

Similar documents
Chapter 4. Route Window C12: Mile End Park and Eleanor Street Shafts

Meridian Water Phase 1 Application

11. ISLINGTON ROUTE SECTION ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE AND ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS OVERVIEW OF ISLINGTON ROUTE SECTION... 2

Grantham Southern Quadrant Link Road Environmental Statement

Longbridge Town Centre Phase 2 Planning Application

University Park, Worcester Non Technical Summary December 2011

Chapter 27 Route Window SE7 Church Manorway Bridge. Transport for London

7 Scoping and Introduction to the Assessments

13. London Bridge London Bridge Area Vision

London Road, Derker. Non Technical Summary. Introduction

Replacement Golf Course Facilities and Residential Development, Churston. Environmental Statement Non-Technical Summary

9 Archaeology & Cultural Heritage

ES 5. Drakelow Park. Environmental Statement. Volume 5: Non Technical Summary. Lead Author Waterman Energy, Environment and Design Ltd

London Bridge London Bridge Area Vision Map

NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY

Response to the London Bridge Area Vision and Site Allocations within the New Southwark Plan

Comments on the proposed scope are requested from WCC/NBBC officers to be provided to SLC Rail by 25 th March 2016 and sent to

BREEDON NORTHERN LIMITED

Barvills Solar Farm Environmental Statement Non-Technical Summary

185 Park Street ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT: NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY

Cardiff International Sports Village Waterfront Development Volume IV : Non-Technical Summary of the Environmental Statement

Proposed World-Class Hotel at Former Royal High School, Regent Road, Edinburgh

LAND SECURITIES REDEVELOPMENT OF NEWNHAM COURT SHOPPING VILLAGE, MAIDSTONE

5. Bankside and The Borough 5.1. Bankside and The Borough Area Vision

NON - TECHNICAL SUMMARY

DEFGH. Crystal Place Park. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Elin Thomas and Emily Low Waterman Environmental

ABBEY MANOR GROUP/SAINSBURY S SUPERMARKETS LTD

Elephant and Castle. Elephant and Castle Area Vision Map. Elephant and Castle. 216 New Southwark Plan Proposed Submission Version NSP42 NSP49 NSP44

Moat Lane Regeneration Project Environmental Statement

Rotherhithe Rotherhithe Area Vision Map

A38 Derby Junctions. Preliminary Environmental Information Report: Non-Technical Summary

METHODOLOGY FOR IMPACT ASSESSMENT ON HERITAGE ASSETS IDENTIFICATION OF THE RECEPTOR ASSESSMENT OF THE RECEPTOR S IMPORTANCE

16. Peckham Peckham Area Vision

NON TECHNICAL SUMMARY

Peckham Peckham Area Vision Map

North Somerset Council Local Development Framework

NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY

6. Bermondsey 6.1. Bermondsey Area Vision

Ref: A073350/SM/sm Date: 13 September 2013

HS2 Environment. Protecting the environment

Welcome to the Public Consultation Exhibition

Euston Community Forum. 11 June Maria Fidelis School

17A. Wind Microclimate

Plumstead Temporary Railway Sidings and Associated Permanent Works

The Haymarket 189 Morrison Street, Edinburgh. Environmental Statement. Volume 1 Non Technical Summary

Longbridge East : Site Wide and Phase One Development

Salisbury Road, Marlborough. Outline Planning Application Environmental Statement: Non-technical Summary

Manchester Town Hall Complex Transformation Programme

Sheffield Victoria Station Development Prospectus January 2014

Environmental Statement Non-Technical Summary

LAND AT MIDDLETON STONEY ROAD AND HOWES LANE, BICESTER ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY. June 2017 Our Ref: Q70433

Armourers Court, Woolwich

BEAUFORT PARK BUILDINGS D3 TO D8 PLANNING APPLICATION ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT NON- TECHNICAL SUMMARY

PANSHANGER QUARRY, Hertfordshire

ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT NON TECHNICAL SUMMARY

and Netherhall Road and Camp Farm EIA

Wyvern Park Skipton Environmental Statement. Non-technical Summary - April 2015

1. Introduction. Site Boundary

A737/A738 Trunk Road (Dalry Bypass)

EVALUATION OF MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVES

21. GREENWICH ROUTE SECTION ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE AND ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS... 2

Principal Place ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT: NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY

Visual and Aesthetic Resources

NRP North Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary. Norwich Research Park North Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary.

Environmental Impact Assessment

LAND AT HOWES LANE, BICESTER ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY. March 2017 Our Ref: Q70433

Non-Technical Summary

1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 INTRODUCTION

The Place Solar Farm

ROCHFORD LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK: Sustainability Appraisal/ Strategic Environmental Assessment. Rochford Core Strategy Preferred Options Document

Thank you for coming. We want to hear your views on proposed improvements to the A1 between junction 65 (Birtley) and junction 67 (Coal House).

A21. Start of works exhibition Tonbridge to Pembury. Welcome. Dualling Scheme

Non-Technical Summary The former Middlesex Hospital site

CENTRAL CHELMSFORD DEVELOPMENT AGENCY: CITY PARK WEST (PHASE 2)

Blackley Mere Developments Limited Blackley Mere Redevelopment

Wednesbury to Brierley Hill Extension

Hounsome Fields, Basingstoke Environmental Statement Non- Technical Summary. For Wates Developments Ltd and Pellipar Investments Ltd

College Green Project Environmental Impact Assessment Report

Trafalgar Wharf, Portchester. Outline Planning Application. Non-Technical Summary

Quality Management. Issue/revision Issue 1 Revision 1 Revision 2 Revision 3. Date 26/08/2014. Signature. Signature. Signature. Project number

Equestrian Skills Centre, SE18

Rannoch 132 / 33 kv Substation Extension

BATH QUAYS WATERSIDE PROJECT

DELIVERING LONDON BRIDGE STATION THE DESIGN TEAM PERSPECTIVE

11/04/2016. NPPF Paragraph 128. NPPF Paragraph 128. NPPF Paragraph 128. NPPF Paragraph 128. NPPF Paragraph 128

XSW11, Plumstead Portal worksites, Interim Statement for NLBH. 1 Introduction Site Methodology and fieldwork objectives...4

South Macclesfield Development Area, Phase 1 Environmental Statement Non- Technical Summary. For Engine of the North

Garden Bridge Planning Application

Crossharbour District Centre ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT: NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY

Issue/revision Issue 1 Revision 1 Revision 2. Remarks Draft FINAL. Date January 2009 September Prepared by Project Team Project Team

Watermark WestQuay Southampton

VALLEY PARK, DIDCOT. Non-Technical Summary. December On behalf of Taylor Wimpey UK Limited, Persimmon Homes and Hallam Land Management Ltd.

Former RAF Sealand Site EIA

20. NEWHAM ROUTE SECTION - ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE AND ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS... 2

HS2 Hybrid Bill Petitioning. Summary of SMBC Asks 23/09/13. Background

Route Window Environmental Topic Summary of Significant Residual Impacts

volume 11 environmental assessment section 2 environmental impact assessment Part 7 ha 218/08

Burnley and Pendle Strategic Outline Business Case. Environmental Report

A303 Stonehenge. Amesbury to Berwick Down Scheme Assessment Report Appendix D CSR and Policy Assessment. Volume 6

Environmental Statement (Volume 1) Non Technical Summary

Transcription:

LONDON BRIDGE STATION ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY June 2011

1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 INTRODUCTION CONTENTS Page 2.1 Introduction 4 2.2 The Site 4 3 THE DEVELOPMENT 3.1 What is it? 5 3.2 Why is it needed? 5 3.3 5 3.4 Alternatives Considered 6 4 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 4.1 Planning Policy 6 4.2 Environmental Impact Assessment 6 5 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS 5.1 Transport 6 5.2 Historic Environment and Townscape 7 5.3 Noise and Vibration 8 5.4 Air Quality 8 5.5 Ground Conditions and Contamination 8 5.6 Ecology and Biodiversity 9 5.7 Archaeology 9 6 CONCLUSIONS 10 June 2011

1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1.1 Proposals for the development of a new layout at London Bridge Station have been prepared by Network Rail and involve a bigger station and concourse to meet the demands of growing capacity and the faster, more frequent trains which are required with the introduction of the Thameslink improvements. 1.1.2 The station is located in the London Borough of Southwark on the south bank of the River Thames and is located at the southern end of London Bridge. The boundary of the site is the red line boundary defined for the purpose of the planning application (see Figure 1 below) and the site extends to 6.244 hectares in area. Figure 1: Site location 1.1.3 This presents the simplified results of a detailed Environmental Impact Assessment which considers the potential environmental effects arising from the redevelopment of London Bridge Station. The Environmental Statement, accompanying the planning application, reports on the environmental impact assessment undertaken in respect of the proposal and provides further details of the development. 1.1.4 Overall, the Project is predicted to have major long-term positive impacts in terms of public transport. There will be some adverse environmental impacts of up to moderate significance, primarily limited to the construction period. The following table presents a summary of the predicted residual (after mitigation) environmental effects of the proposed development. Further details of the assessment and results are provided in the Environmental Statement. June 2011 Page 3 for Network Rail

Environmental Specialism Phase Impact Transport Historic Environment and Townscape Noise and Vibration Air Quality Ground Conditions and Contamination Ecology and Biodiversity Archaeology 2 INTRODUCTION 2.1 Introduction Moderate adverse Slight to major beneficial Moderate adverse Slight to moderate beneficial Slight adverse Negligible Slight adverse Slight adverse 2.1.1 This presents the simplified results of a detailed assessment of the potential environmental effects arising from the redevelopment of London Bridge Station, proposed by Network Rail. 2.1.2 Figure 1 above shows the site location and proposed site layout. 2.2 The Site 2.2.1 The 6.244 hectare application site is located in Central London in the London Borough of Southwark on the south bank of the River Thames, and is located at the southern end of London Bridge. The site is bounded by St. Thomas Street, Joiner Street, Tooley Street and Bermondsey Street. 2.2.2 The existing station is split into a number of levels; street level, terminus track and through track level. The existing concourse provides retail outlets and ticket offices. The entrance to London Bridge London Underground Station is located in the western part of the station. 2.2.3 A wide variety of uses (for example retail units, bars, restaurants, the London Dungeon Museum) are accommodated at street level below the tracks. Stainer Street and Weston Street run north/south through this level, beneath the main station concourse areas. 2.2.4 To the south of the station, along St. Thomas Street is the Guys Hospital Campus. At the south western corner of the station is situated the Shard - a 310m tall building currently under construction which will accommodate offices, a hotel, restaurants and residential uses. June 2011 Page 4 for Network Rail

3 THE DEVELOPMENT 3.1 What is it? 3.1.1 The proposal is for: Provision of new station layout at London Bridge, including construction of new station concourse, together with the demolition of existing arches; the demolition of Listed train shed and part of the wall on St Thomas Street; and the demolition of 84 Tooley Street and the construction of new replacement facades on Tooley Street and St Thomas Street; landscaping and other works associated with the station. 3.1.2 The station currently has three through-line platforms and nine terminus platforms. Following construction, the station will have nine through platforms and six terminus platforms, and will accommodate up to 18 train paths per hour at peak times. The construction of the railway and other works including the platform and line re arrangements are all approved under the Network Rail (Thameslink 2000) Order 2006. 3.2 Why is it needed? 3.2.1 The works to London Bridge Station are required primarily in order to accommodate the Thameslink Programme. Due to its platform and track configuration, the existing station would be a major bottleneck for Thameslink services, and without the proposed improvement works, 80% of the Thameslink Programme capacity cannot be delivered. 3.2.2 The works to London Bridge Station are the last major part of the Thameslink Programme to be delivered. Improvements to the other Thameslink Stations in Central London are either completed, or are already under construction. 3.2.3 The Thameslink Programme will dramatically improve rail services across London, increasing the number and capacity of trains to more destinations, and reducing crowding on the London Underground. 3.2.4 In addition to the benefits to the Thameslink Programme, London Bridge Station is already operating at maximum capacity during peak hours and the improvements will provide a better station layout for travellers which will relieve station congestion and 'future proof' the station to beyond 2070. 3.3 3.3.1 is proposed from 2013 until 2018. 3.3.2 will take place in stages or slices through the station. The Stage 1 worksite will be at the south side at the low level station area and each subsequent stage will move the work site northwards. The main worksites will be St Thomas Street and Vinegar Yard, along with Stainer Street, Weston Street, and individual parts of the station. During construction, working hours outside the rail corridor will normally be between 0800 to 1800 Monday to Friday, and 0800 to 1300 on Saturday. 3.3.3 It is currently anticipated that Stainer Street and a section of Weston Street (between Tooley Street and St Thomas Street) will close permanently from the start of construction and part of St Thomas Street will be temporarily closed. June 2011 Page 5 for Network Rail

3.4 Alternatives Considered Do-Minimum 3.4.1 If there were to be no changes to London Bridge Station other than minor ones which are proposed as part of the Shard development, the station would reach unacceptable levels of congestion by 2018 and there would be no capacity for any future passenger growth. Furthermore, the Thameslink Programme would be significantly hindered to the detriment of sustainable development, improved public transport, and reduced transport emissions. 4 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 4.1 Planning Policy 4.1.1 The proposal accords with national and local planning policies. 4.2 Environmental Impact Assessment 4.2.1 The Environmental Statement presents the assessment of the environmental impacts likely to result from the construction and operation of the scheme. It identifies how the surrounding environment could be affected by the proposals and suggests mitigation measures that will avoid, minimise or offset any negative effects. 4.2.2 The Environmental Statement has been prepared following consultation with the London Borough of Southwark, statutory consultees (such as Transport for London, and Natural England) and other key organisations. Specialist consultants in a wide range of disciplines have been employed to carry out environmental studies and assessments, summarised below and detailed in the Environmental Statement. 5 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS 5.1 Transport 5.1.1 The strategic location of London Bridge Station in Central London means it is an extremely busy area for vehicles (including buses and taxis), rail and London Underground services, and pedestrians. It is estimated that, taking the Rail / London Underground / Bus station complex as a whole, more than 100,000 people interchange between modes (including streets) during the morning and evening threehour peaks. As a result, the station and surrounding streets can get extremely overcrowded in peak times. 5.1.2 During construction, the station will remain open and operational, although some train and bus service disruptions will be required, which will affect passengers journeys. Some streets surrounding the station will be closed and diversions will be in place. vehicles will cause an increase in traffic on surrounding main roads, particularly Bermondsey Street and Tooley Street. Overall, there will be moderate adverse impact on travellers during construction. 5.1.3 Permanent, operational impacts will overall be beneficial for pedestrians using the station due to an improved station layout and less crowding. Pedestrian routes to and through the station will be much easier and more intuitive. Streetscape enhancements and improved pedestrian crossing facilities will have public realm benefits. Users of train services will benefit from the improved train capacity and journey opportunities June 2011 Page 6 for Network Rail

offered by the Thameslink Programme across London and south-east England. This is a moderate to major beneficial impact. 5.1.4 Weston Street (between Tooley Street and St. Thomas Street) and Stainer Street will be closed permanently as a result of the Project, in order to accommodate the improved station concourse layout. Due to diversions, traffic will increase on sections of Bermondsey Street, St Thomas Street and Borough High Street. Combined with the additional traffic generated by the Shard and London Bridge Place, this will create a slight to moderate adverse impact. 5.2 Historic Environment and Townscape 5.2.1 London Bridge Station sits within a complex historic environment, with a number of designated and undesignated heritage assets in the vicinity, and some heritage assets within the station site itself. There are four Conservation Areas in the vicinity of the site -the Tooley Street Conservation Area, Tower Bridge Conservation Area, the Bermondsey Street Conservation Area, and the Borough High Street Conservation Area. Overall, while some adverse impacts may be felt during construction, an overall slight to moderate beneficial impact is likely to be produced by the proposed scheme, as the final design will make a positive contribution to the adjacent historic environment. 5.2.2 During construction, the majority of impacts will be of an indirect nature, limiting their overall magnitude. During construction, slight adverse, indirect impacts will be felt upon the historic environment as a result of demolition and rebuilding; this is particularly the case on Tooley Street. Hoardings, and the largely internal nature of the building works, will ensure that the significance of local heritage assets is preserved to a large extent, while in most cases, heritage assets are shielded by distance or other structures. 5.2.3 Slight adverse effects will be felt on the settings of heritage assets in the vicinity of the station during construction, as a result of increased construction traffic and hoardings; these are purely indirect impacts. Substantial adverse impacts will be felt on the Grade II Listed train shed and on the undesignated heritage asset of 64-84 Tooley Street as these are being demolished. The removal of the former is necessary as a result of the new track alignment proposed, and essential to the success of the Thameslink scheme, while 64-84 Tooley Street's demolition is necessary in order to achieve the large north-south concourse that has been identified as vital to this scheme. In addition, this scheme envisages the part-demolition of the Undesignated Heritage Asset of London Bridge Station, which will have a substantial adverse impact during construction, followed by a substantial beneficial impact once the station is operational; a much greater understanding of the building's heritage significance will be possible once works are completed. 5.2.4 These impacts will be mitigated by building recording, and are necessary in order to achieve the substantial beneficial impacts that the station will provide once operational. These include slight to moderate beneficial impacts on the settings of heritage assets. Overall therefore, the majority of impacts will be indirect, with only the three examples of demolition noted above causing any direct impacts. Otherwise the works will cause only alterations in the settings of listed buildings and Conservation Areas. 5.2.5 Once the station is in operation, the new public realm, concourse entrances and roofscape will improve understandings of the surrounding historic environment's significance, despite the loss of one Designated Heritage Asset, and one June 2011 Page 7 for Network Rail

Undesignated Heritage Asset. Overall, therefore, the development should, as stated above, produce a slight to moderate beneficial impact on the surrounding historic environment. 5.3 Noise and Vibration 5.3.1 Sensitive noise receptors in the area include hotels, residential and office buildings, Guy s Hospital on St Thomas Street and London Bridge Hospital on Tooley Street. 5.3.2 During construction, noise and vibration impacts at the closest receptors at various stages of the construction programme may arise from construction activities such as piling. Although these activities will be fairly lengthy in duration, they are not permanent and best practice mitigation measures such as the use of quiet plant and temporary noise barriers will reduce noise and vibration impacts to slight adverse. Any increases in road traffic noise are not considered to be significant. 5.3.3 Once construction is complete and the station is operational, the only potential impact will be from loudspeakers / Public Address systems within the station. These will be designed to have negligible noise impacts outside of the station. The redesigned station elevations and platform canopies provide the opportunity to reduce the potential effects of the Public Address systems so that there is an improvement on current conditions. 5.4 Air Quality 5.4.1 Sensitive air pollution receptors in the area include hotels, residential and office buildings, Guy s Hospital on St Thomas Street and London Bridge Hospital on Tooley Street. 5.4.2 Current levels of air quality are poor within the London Borough of Southwark due to large volumes of traffic and several construction projects. The scheme lies within an area which has been designated as an Air Quality Management Area for both nitrogen dioxide and particulate matter. 5.4.3 The construction of the proposed Scheme has the potential to cause increases in dust and particulate matter emissions due to demolition of existing structures, dust from materials, and exhaust emissions from construction plant and vehicles. With best practice mitigation measures such as use of hoardings, covering and damping down materials, low emission engines and monitoring, the impact on air quality during construction is expected to be slight adverse overall, although the impact will reduce with distance. 5.4.4 During operation of the proposed Scheme, no adverse impacts on air quality are predicted. 5.5 Ground Conditions and Contamination 5.5.1 Land contamination is the presence of substances in, on or under the land that have the potential to cause harm, either to the environment or to human health. 5.5.2 The main possible sources of contamination at the site are from railway activities over the past 150 years, fill materials used as part of the construction of the viaducts and station, and arisings from the letting of viaduct arches. June 2011 Page 8 for Network Rail

5.5.3 The potential for exposure to contaminated materials is most significant during the construction phase. If potential hazards are present, standard mitigation measures will be applied, such as safe working practices, personal protective equipment, security measures to prevent unauthorised personnel on site, and environmental measures to minimise contamination of underlying aquifers. The handling, storage and removal of potentially contaminated material will be subject to current waste management legislation and guidance. Unexploded Ordnance may pose a potential risk although this is considered unlikely. 5.5.4 Provided that appropriate health and safety, and site based environmental procedures are implemented, no adverse impacts are anticipated to site workers, the general public or the wider environment from localised ground contamination during either construction or operation. 5.6 Ecology and Biodiversity 5.6.1 An ecological assessment has been undertaken based on a desk study and field survey. A walkover survey of the Project site and immediate surrounding area was undertaken in October 2010. 5.6.2 There are no statutory wildlife sites within 2km of the Project site. Several nonstatutory wildlife sites (designated at a local level) are present within a 1km radius. No adverse impacts are expected on these sites during construction or operation. 5.6.3 The majority of the proposed site comprises hard standing habitats with negligible ecological value, although there are records of bats, black redstarts (a type of bird), and common and widespread nesting bird species in the vicinity. 5.6.4 Detailed surveys concluded that bats were not using the Project site and surrounding area for roosting or foraging. Two black redstart territories were identified on the periphery of the Project site boundary. Black redstarts are a high priority conservation species on the London Biodiversity Action Plan, as there are fewer than 300 breeding pairs in the UK. 5.6.5 Site clearance and demolition of structures will only take place once it has been determined that no nesting birds, including black redstarts, are present. There are predicted to be no adverse impacts on ecology during construction or operation. 5.7 Archaeology 5.7.1 Although there are no statutorily designated sites (Scheduled Monuments) in the study area, it is located in a locally designated area of archaeological importance, and contains archaeological finds dating back to Prehistoric times. 5.7.2 The main potential impact on archaeological remains is from piling works during construction. A mitigation methodology, following best practice guidelines, will be agreed with Network Rail s archaeological advisor and the London Borough of Southwark Archaeologist. The physical loss of any assets through piling can be partly offset through a programme of considered and focused archaeological excavation, analysis and publication. This will leave the resource clearly modified and with its character affected but with knowledge of it considerably improved. Therefore the impact of the proposed development after mitigation will be slight adverse. 5.7.3 There will be no long term, operational impacts on archaeology. June 2011 Page 9 for Network Rail

6 CONCLUSIONS 6.1.1 This has outlined the findings of the Environmental Impact Assessment of the London Bridge Station Redevelopment, which are contained within the Environmental Statement that accompanies the planning application. 6.1.2 Following mitigation measures, there are likely to be some adverse impacts during the construction phase with regards to traffic, heritage and townscape, noise and vibration, air quality and archaeology. 6.1.3 The scheme will have major overarching, long-term beneficial impacts of improved public transport links across London and the South East, as well as improving the public realm within and surrounding London Bridge Station. There will be major benefits to users of the station arising from substantially increased passenger capacity within the station concourses. June 2011 Page 10 for Network Rail