Campus Outdoor Lighting Plan

Similar documents
Landscape and Streetscape Design 2.5

Building Exterior Lighting Grant Program. Applications will be reviewed April 1, July 1 and October 1, 2019

LIGHTING DESIGN STANDARDS SECTION City of Maryland Heights ZONING CODE

SECTION LIGHTING REGULATIONS

CHAPTER ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS IN THE NC, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONE

Monterey Downtown Lighting Strategy

4.9 Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan Design Guidelines

Sidewalks Street Lights

Wayfinding. North Gateway: Integrate a vertical gateway marker on the west side of Ward Street at the south corner of Vernon Street.

Lighting Guidelines. Planning Services Department Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington

Presentation Item C Annotated Model Outline for a Framework for a Green Infrastructure Plan

Chapter Master Planned Communities (MPC) District

Uniformity Avg. : Min. Maintained Use/Task

Design Principles, Design Guidelines, and Standing Review Committees for The Arboretum at Penn State

Willamette Falls Downtown District Policies and Design Guidelines

BUILDING DESIGN STANDARDS FACILITIES MANAGEMENT AND ANCILLARY SERVICES EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS DIVISION 32 Exterior Lighting

CHAPTER 13 DESIGN GUIDELINES

Technical Report One

ARTICLE XVI LIGHTING, NOISE AND ODOR/ODOROUS MATTER Shelby County Zoning Regulations 2013

FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES 3 Urban Design

MIXED-USE ZONING DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES

CECW-AG 11 June 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR MAJOR SUBORDINATE COMMANDS AND DISTRICT COMMANDS

PD-32: Light Pollution

Design Guidelines for Exterior Lighting

Lighting Depth: Courtyard Franklin Care Center, Franklin Lakes, NJ

SUBCHAPTER 4-B GUIDELINES FOR THE B-3 COMMERCIAL CHARACTER AREA

BIRMINGHAM TOWNSHIP CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance No Dated 02/18/03

Bob Korp, AICP LEED AP Bryan Smith, RLA, ASLA. Stephen Helms

implementation r expression in landscape

Campus Sign Plan. Adopted by the Campus Planning Committee Adopted: June 26, 2006 Revised: April 14, 2016

FLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist

THE COMPLETE GUIDE TO OUTDOOR WALL LIGHTS

ARTICLE 22, DIVISION 10 LIGHTING

CHAPTER 7 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

How Photometric Design Enhances Energy Savings and Asset Management

Downtown. Design Review. City of Bartlesville Bartlesville welcomes and encourages Special Events. Special Events build a sense of

CITY OF PLACERVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

Design Guidelines for the Route 30 Corridor Master Plan: Subdivision and Land Development Elements

Lindsey Beane. Executive Summary

ARTICLE 31 EXTERIOR LIGHTING

PLANNING BOARD REPORT PORTLAND, MAINE

To qualify for federal Transportation Enhancement (TE) funds a project must meet two basic federal requirements:

City of Kingston Heritage Commemoration Program Guidelines: 7 May 2010

Office of Campus Planning. Subject: Campus Planning Committee Meeting, November 16, 2015

Goal 1: To Encourage the Orderly, Harmonious and Judicious Use of University Resources in the Development of University Land.

SMEAL COLLEGE OF BUSINESS BUILDING University Park, PA

ARTICLE 10 EXTERIOR LIGHTING

AESTHETIC APPEARANCE. Design Guidelines for Grade-Separated Pedestrian, Cyclist and Equestrian Structures

1. Parks & Recreation Neighborhood Parks Community Parks Special Use Sites 2. Open Space 3. Trails

COMMUNICATION URBAN DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CITY OF DES MOINES, IOWA MAY 16, 2017 MEETING

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Planning Division m e m o r a n d u m

Global Tech LED 8901 Quality Rd Bonita Springs, FL, Fuel Station Lighting Solutions

DATE ISSUED: March 12, 2014 REPORT NO: 101. Old Globe Way Improvements and San Diego Zoo Employee Parking Structure

13. New Construction. Context & Character

The Vision. Photo provided by The Minervini Group. 46 Vision, Objectives & Strategies

Public Hearing, July 12, 2018

City of Redlands Architectural Guidelines for Non-Residential Development

IES/IDA Model Lighting Ordinance

The transportation system in a community is an

Figure Example of out door dining in the public right-of-way.

11.0. Design Manual: Sustainable Initiatives. Chapel Hill Streetscape and Lighting Master Plan mikyoung kim design all rights reserved.

UPPER DUBLIN TOWNSHIP MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PA STAND-ALONE LIGHTING ORDINANCE

The Corporation of Delta. COUNC~L REPORT Regular Meeting. Burnsview Secondary School/Chalmers Park Memorandum of Understanding

ESTABLISH AN EFFICIENT TOWN CENTER

ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE TO ADD A NEW SECTION 4.N. IN THE ZONING CODE FOR THE TOWN OF MIDDLETOWN, RELATING TO MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT

Existing Area Description: The area is an angle around the North point of the building. It is a wide patio wrapping the façade of the building.

FAÇADE DESIGN GUIDE. A Placemaking Initiative of the City of Richmond Department of Planning & Development Review

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Newell Street. Site Plan Item #2. Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

CHAPTER 3. Design Standards for Business, Commercial, Industrial, Recreational and Institutional Uses

Granite Belt Arboretum Australia

CHAPTER 12 DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS

Quality of the Visual Environment

Incentive Zoning Regulations Florida Municipal City of Orlando

6. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT

I-70 Corridor Enhancement Plan

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 3

Chapter 7: Streetscape & Design Elements

The site to the south of Tanana Loop, east of the Botanical Gardens was evaluated but deemed too small for the array size required.

KENDALL SQUARE INITIATIVE. Planned Unit Development Special Permit Application - SoMa September 8, 2015

DESIGN REVIEW STANDARDS CITY OF LANGLEY

A BLUEPRINT FOR BROCKTON A CITY-WIDE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT POLICY DRAFT. City Planning and Development Department Kansas City, Missouri

TRINITY LUTHERAN SCHOOL RENOVATIONS

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

11.0 TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT

Analysis. University of Iowa Campus Lighting Strategy... Fall Page 1

Reynoldsburg Major Commercial Corridors Streetscape and Development Design Guidelines/Standards. Development Design Guidelines/Standards

Questions for Carlsbad City Council Members and Candidates (July 1, 2016)

Official Plan Review: Draft Built Form Policies

36.1. PURPOSE APPLICABILITY DESIGN REVIEW GUIDELINES

Article 14. LIGHTING REGULATIONS

REVISIONS Summary of Change. 6/1/12 All Replaced entire document with new revision

Public Art Plan. We have elected to submit Public Art Plans before or concurrently with the CSP Submittal per the FDP Manual

DESIGN GUIDELINES & STANDARDS. August UNIVERSITY of DELAWARE

KENDALL SQUARE INITIATIVE. Planned Unit Development Special Permit Application - SoMa September 8, 2015

Assessment of the Extent and Quality of the Landscape Features of the Campus.

COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

Chapter PEDESTRIAN COMMERCIAL (PC) ZONING DISTRICT

2. Measurements are to be made at ground level, with the light-sensor portion of the meter lying flat on the ground, pointing upward.

Transcription:

University of Oregon November 2004 Campus Planning Committee and Ad Hoc Committee on Campus Lighting I. Purpose: The purpose of this plan is to interpret and enhance the existing Long Range Campus Development Plan (LRCDP) outdoor lighting policies creating a Level 3 Plan. The LRCDP states: The University recognizes that campus and exterior building lighting is needed to address adequately the personal safety requirements of students, faculty, staff and campus visitors without significantly damaging its nighttime aesthetic qualities, and to be consistent with its concerns for energy conservation. The plan defines lighting parameters for entrances, pedestrian walkways, and parking lots on campus. It also describes review requirements. Issues beyond physical design, such as safety concerns and operations, are not within the purview of the LRCDP and are addressed by the Department of Public Safety and Facilities Services. Therefore, the University Planning Office and the Campus Planning Committee (CPC) have worked with staff from the Department of Public Safety and Facilities Services to develop this plan. All proposed policies are consistent with federal standards established by the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA) and City regulations. II. Background: Outdoor lighting on campus has received a great deal of attention over the years. This plan is designed to address the key issues and concerns surrounding the subject. Students have expressed concern about night safety on campus. Adequate lighting is one part of the solution; it does not imply, however, that a lit area is guaranteed to be safe. The LRCDP states that the university is committed to developing a program of maintenance, rehabilitation, and repair of campus lighting on a systematic, continuous basis and will continue to seek adequate funding for this activity. Although many new fixtures have been installed over the past few years, limited budgets and lack of an overall plan leave room for improvement. In addition, the recently adopted City of Eugene outdoor lighting standards require cut-off fixtures, which are not currently used by the university. The new City standards also categorize the university (PL-Public Land zoning) as a Low Ambient Light Area unless an area is determined to have a high level of nighttime activity. These issues, combined with the recent funding allocated by the Associated Students of the University of Oregon (ASUO) towards lighting improvements, have triggered a renewed interest in and need to prepare a comprehensive lighting plan. Page 1

Establishing a plan (in particular prioritizing outdoor lighting walkways) will also allow the CPC to review outdoor lighting improvements in a comprehensive manner, thus eliminating the need for individual lamp location reviews. In the past, the CPC has reviewed individual proposed locations for lighting fixtures. The CPC approved the first phase of a network of outdoor lighting walkways in August 1996. This plan extends the initial phase to the entire campus. III. Review Requirements: The following departments/committees are responsible for the design, review, and installation of outdoor lighting fixtures on campus: Facilities Services: All installations are coordinated by Facilities Services. Department of Public Safety: The Department of Public Safety is responsible for ensuring that proposed lighting designs and installations properly consider safety needs. Campus Planning Committee: All installations using standard fixtures that are in approved outdoor lighting walkways or large parking lots, and that meet the lighting guidelines described below, are coordinated by Facilities Services and are not subject to CPC review. All other exterior lighting installations are subject to CPC review. Examples of installations requiring review include use of a standard fixture in an area outside of the approved outdoor lighting walkways, or use of a non-standard light fixture anywhere on campus. Often CPC review of lighting fixtures occurs as part of a project s schematic design review. IV. General Lighting Guidelines: The following general guidelines apply to the selection, design, and placement of all campus outdoor lighting: 1. Adequately address the personal safety requirements of students, faculty, staff and campus visitors (LRCDP) as recommended by the Department of Public Safety. 2. Maximize energy conservation (LRCDP). 3. Preserve the campus nighttime aesthetic qualities (LRCDP). 4. Restrict light trespass. In particular, unusual applications, such as illuminating outdoor recreation fields or facilities, need to be designed with the specific activity in mind while protecting adjacent spaces and uses from spillover light to the maximum extent possible (LRCDP). 5. Ensure that main entrances, major walkways and adjacent spaces are well lighted. However, avoid deliberate lighting of open lawn expanse between paths (LRCDP). 6. Minimize the difference between lighting levels in adjacent areas to prevent strong contrasts and shadows. 7. Eliminate glare to the greatest extent possible. 8. Recognize the relationship between lighting and other landscape features such as vegetation. The placement and design of outdoor lighting need to be carefully coordinated with sensitive management of campus vegetation. When possible, lighting engineers and landscape architects should work collaboratively in Page 2

designing nighttime illumination improvements (LRCDP). Minimize the need to substantially trim landscaping while recognizing the need to minimize shadows and provide surveyable surroundings. 9. Recognize that uniform lighting is often more important than the amount of lighting when establishing the sense of a safe, well-lit area. 10. Recognize that lighting serves as an architectural design element in the landscape setting in addition to it functional qualities. V. Prioritized Plan for Outdoor Lighting Walkways The creation of a prioritized plan for outdoor lighting walkways will help achieve the general lighting goals described above by helping to provide a sense of a safe night environment on campus while conserving energy to the greatest degree possible and preserving the landscaped, park-like character of campus. The premise behind this network of walkways is that it is of primary importance to encourage people to use well-traveled paths as supported by the Department of Public Safety. Lighting these walkways identifies them and encourages pedestrians to use them. In general a walkway, plus about 20 feet on either side, should be adequately lit as appropriate. The network of walkways includes corresponding main entrances and parking areas. Identifying these outdoor lighting walkways does not preclude the possible need to light other areas of campus; rather, it helps determine where to focus lighting efforts as resources become available. It should be noted that many of the outdoor lighting walkways are already adequately lit. To be designated as outdoor lighting walkways, the routes will: 1. Follow all general lighting guidelines (see above). 2. Link major building entrances to each other and to primary auto/bike parking areas and transit stops (pay particular attention to buildings that have high levels of nighttime use). 3. Add to a sense of a safe night environment. 4. Encourage the use of well-traveled areas. 5. Correspond with ADA access routes. 6. Preserve the landscaped, park-like character of campus. 7. Protect significant landscape features. 8. Conserve energy to the greatest degree possible. 9. Correspond with call box locations. 10. Correspond with designated bike paths. The prioritized plan for outdoor lighting walkways is represented on the attached map (Map 1). This plan recognizes that City-owned streets are a component of the outdoor lighting walkway network for the campus area. Although the university does not have jurisdiction over these public-right-of-ways, the City should be encouraged to make lighting improvements where necessary. Page 3

VI. Light Fixture Designs Consistent landscape design features, such as light fixtures, benches, and trash receptacles, are important components in defining the overall campus character. These design features create a visual connection throughout campus, helping to integrate the variously styled buildings and landscapes. Criteria for selecting light fixtures include: 1. All general lighting guidelines. 2. Visual appearance - compatibility with existing fixtures, campus character, and pedestrian scale. 3. Initial cost. 4. Maintenance costs and requirements. 5. Operations and energy efficiency (LRCDP). 6. Cut-off (to meet city standards). 7. Quality and color of light/type of light: Within the limits of technology and reasonable cost, lamps should emit a spectrum as close to natural light as possible (LRCDP). However, in consideration of the university's commitment to energy savings and to economical maintenance, high-pressure sodium lamps are acceptable according to the LRCDP. 8. Availability of parts over a long period of time. 9. Compatibility with the existing poles (if a proposed standard for pedestrian walkways). 10. Free-standing design - avoid building-mounted fixtures (LRCDP) Campus-standard Fixture: The campus-standard light fixture shall be used whenever possible to maintain consistency throughout the campus landscape. It is particularly important to use the campus-standard fixture for entrances, pedestrian walkways, small/medium auto-parking areas, bikeparking areas, and transit stops. The LRCDP standard fixture is a 10- or 12-foot-high fluted lamppost (painted dark green) fitted with acorn globes. The pre-approved model is the Visco, Series A, Holophane Granville with a Granville G-V-8N globe. The type of refractor is not standardized; it depends on the pattern of light distribution needed in individual applications (LRCDP). The standard lamp fixture has an interior shield to meet the city cut-off requirements while providing appropriate light distribution. The light source is metal halide, a white-light source. Conversion to a white-light source shall be done in a coordinated manner, area by area, to avoid a mismatched appearance. All new construction and lighting upgrade projects shall specify metal halide fixtures and adjacent areas shall be converted at the same time whenever possible. Facilities Services anticipates that it will take about ten years to fully convert the campus fixtures to metal halide. Page 4

All Other Applications: Although the campus-standard light fixture should be used whenever possible, a non-standard fixture design may be appropriate to meet special lighting needs, for example in large parking lots and playing fields. Also, a non-standard fixture may be appropriate to ensure design compatibility with the historic or architectural character of a particular building. adjacent area or adjacent buildings. This is particularly true for areas designated as a significant open space by the LRCDP or one possessing historic significance. All non-standard lighting fixtures are subject to the lighting guidelines contained in this plan and are subject to Campus Planning Committee review. Parking Lots: Alternative designs for large parking lot fixtures should only be considered for the interior portions of large parking lots. The standard pedestrian-scale acorn-globe fixture should be used in transition areas, which include the outer edges of the lot, walks adjacent to or bisecting the lot, and campus drives and streets. The standard acorn globe fixture should also be used in locations where a taller, contemporary parking-lot fixture would detract from the character of the Standard fixture VII. Lighting Levels and Ratios As stated in the LRCDP, "adequate consideration is to be given to the perceptions of the relationship between light and safety as well as the actual measured light conditions. In consideration of this, the University does not subscribe to a specific quantitative illuminance standard. Similarly, the University recognizes the need for uniform light distribution, but does not subscribe to a specific ratio standard." The general guidelines should be followed when determining appropriate light levels and ratios. In particular, uniformity and quality of light are encouraged over quantity. In all cases, IESNA standards and city regulations shall be met. Note: (LRCDP) indicates that the guideline is an existing policy contained in the 1991 Long Range Campus Development Plan. Available on-line at the University Planning Office web page: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~uplan/lightingplan.pdf Page 5

Map updated Novermber2004