Historic Resources. San Mateo has a Historic Building Survey that identified roughly 200 historically significant

Similar documents
Standards Compliance Review 303 Baldwin Avenue, San Mateo, California

CEQA and Historic Resources: The Local Government Perspective

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

CEQA and Historic Preservation: A 360 Degree Review

Historic Preservation Element

5.0 Historic Resource Survey

Design Review Commission Report

Landmark Ordinance Task Force. Meeting 7 October 9, 2018

WEST OAKLAND SPECIFIC PLAN & DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

CITY OF TORRANCE HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE AND TORRANCE TRACT HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN. City Council Tuesday, December 5, 2017 PAGE & TURNBULL

California Preservation Foundation Historic Resources 101 HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE TO DESIGNATE A LANDMARK DISTRICT OVERLAY FOR THE CRAWFORDS VISTA LANDMARK DISTRICT

CITY OF GENEVA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 22 S. FIRST STREET GENEVA, ILLINOIS 60134

Architectural Review Board Report

2. INTRODUCTION 2.1 AUTHORITY 2.2 PURPOSE AND INTENT 2.3 SITE LOCATION

CHAPTER 1. Ms. Guajardo s Class - Central Elementary CH 1 1

M E M O R A N D U M PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA PLANNING DIVISION

M E M O R A N D U M CITY PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA

CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH HISTORIC PRESERVATION CHAPTER MBMC PROCEDURES FOR HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION

1INTRODUCTION. Purpose of the Truckee Railyard Master Plan

RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Re: Proposed Historic Preservation Ordinance Update

EXHIBIT A. Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 1 (Town Center) First Amended Project Plan 1

Design Review Benjamin Franklin Hotel 44 East Third Avenue San Mateo, California...

APPENDIX M. Correspondence with the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation. Continued

shown on the following page.

City Center Specific Plan Amendments And Background Report City of Richmond. PLANNING COMMISION FINAL DRAFT January, 2001

Glenborough at Easton Land Use Master Plan

ABOUT HISTORIC DISTRICTS

Kinzie Industrial Corridor

M E M O R A N D U M PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA PLANNING DIVISION

SUBJECT: PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF PROJECT LOCATED AT 2632 EAST WASHINGTON BOULEVARD ('ST. LUKE MEDICAL CENTER')

DRAFT FOR COMMENT: EASTLAKE AVENUE PEDESTRIAN DISTRICT OVERLAY ORDINANCE

Water Efficiency Ordinance ZCA No El Monte City Council June 7, 2016

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES POLICIES

E O L A F I V E. Location Map SUMMARY G M P Z O N I T E M S # 1 A. & B.

FINAL WEST OAKLAND SPECIFIC PLAN & FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

5. HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND URBAN DESIGN

M E M O R A N D U M PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA CITY PLANNING DIVISION

Fredericksburg Historic Resources Survey

CITY OF ALAMEDA PLANNING BOARD Draft RESOLUTION

REPORT TO COUNCIL City of Sacramento

Chapter 19: Cultural Resources

Planning Districts INTRODUCTION

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

A. WHAT IS A GENERAL PLAN?

HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN

Steering Committee Meeting

Hendersonville Historic Preservation Commission Main Street Local Historic District Design Guidelines

California Preservation Foundation Historic Context Statements HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP

Review of Demolitions and Certificates of Non-Historic Status

V. Urban Design A. INTRODUCTION B. CITY IMAGE

GRAND PRAIRIE SIGNIFICANT LANDMARK APPLICATION / INFORMATION FORM Please read guidelines and instructions before completing form

September 30, 2014 Ms. Lorraine Weiss Department of Community Development City of San Mateo 330 West 20th Avenue San Mateo, CA

Table L-1 Summary Action Strategy. Action Item Timing Status Responsible Agency

DRAFT Subject to Modifications

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

SAINT MATTHEW SCHOOL & PARISH

San Francisco General Plan Preservation Element: Objectives 7-9. Historic Preservation Commission August 20, 2014

AGENDA REPORT. William ft Crouch, AlA, NCARB, AICP, LEED (AP), Urban Designer

Chapter LANDMARKS AND HISTORIC SPECIAL REVIEW DISTRICTS A.120 Enforcement A.130 Severability. Tacoma Municipal Code

February 6, Re: Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit 5590 E. 7 th Street, Angel Food Donuts Sign. Dear Long Beach Planning Commissioners:

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORWICH

MEMORANDUM. DATE: March 15, Chairman and Members Community Redevelopment Agency. Leif J. Ahnell, C.P.A., C.G.F.O. Executive Director

New Jersey and National Registers of Historic Places. Jonathan Kinney Senior Historic Preservation Specialist NJ Historic Preservation Office

Tonight s Agenda. Summary Presentation Open House. Group Discussion Next Steps: online community wide survey

Historic Preservation in Charlottesville 2011

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report

1755 Le Roy Avenue (Tellefson Hall)

ECR. el camino real master plan. settings and opportunities. The City of San Mateo SMWM. Adopted by the San Mateo City Council September 18, 2001

CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH STAFF REPORT. THROUGH: Marisa Lundstedt, Director of Community Development

7-1. Chapter 7: Historic Preservation. 7.0 Accomplishments since Introduction. New Castle County 2012 Comprehensive Plan

APPENDIX F. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

No comments related to land use and planning issues were received in response to the Notice of Preparation.

Planning Commission Staff Report February 19, 2009

URBAN DESIGN POLICY DEVELOPMENT STEP 1: BACKGROUND RESEARCH

Fourth Street Spenger s

Certificate of Appropriateness Case Report HEARING DATE: MARCH 20, 2019

HISTORIC PRESERVATION ELEMENT Table of Contents

CITY OF COLWICH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE LAND USE 1

III. Design Principles

NOTICE OF PREPARATION ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING


Appearance Review Board Staff Report

CHAPTER 2: HISTORIC BACKGROUND

HILLSDALE STATION AREA PLAN COMMUNITY WORKSHOP 2 City of San Mateo

HISTORIC PRESERVATION RESOURCE GUIDE CHAPTER TEN: HISTORIC PRESERVATION RESOURCE LIST HISTORIC PRESERVATION RESOURCE GUIDE

Attachment 1 December 4, 2012

SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT

OCEAN BOULEVARD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (PD-5)

August 1, 2018 beginning at 12:30 p.m. in Room 400 of City Hall

SAN RAFAEL GENERAL PLAN 2040 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW

Architectural Inventory Form

Architectural Inventory Form (page 1 of 5)

How To Get the Development You Planned

Transcription:

Historic Resources City of San Mateo Planning Division Community Development Department 330 West 20 th Avenue www.cityofsanmateo.org San Mateo, CA 94403 planning @cityofsanmateo.org Updated: March 20, 2017 This brochure provides an overview of the review and regulation of historic resources in the City of San Mateo, including the City s Historic Preservation Ordinance, the Zoning Code, and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). It also describes the process for evaluating properties in the City for historic resource classification. The following summary information regarding Historic Resources in the City of San Mateo includes references to the City of San Mateo Zoning Code Historic Preservation Ordinance - Chapter 27.66. The entire Chapter can be found online at: http://qcode.us/codes/sanmateo/view.php?topic= 27-27_66&showAll=1&frames=off Historic Preservation Background The establishment of the City s Downtown at B Street and Third Avenue as a result of the arrival of the railroad is one key to the development character and history of the City. The second key is the establishment of estates and country homes in San Mateo during the 1800's and then the subdivision of those estates in the early 1900's. As a result of this early start in suburbanization, San Mateo has many historically significant buildings, structures, and landmark sites. Individual buildings of distinction are important to San Mateo's economy and quality of life. These structures contribute to neighborhood identity and cultural diversity and they add to the overall character of the City. Interest in preservation of these structures among City residents has grown over the last few years. San Mateo has a Historic Building Survey that identified roughly 200 historically significant structures. Approximately 37 of these structures are individually eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. The Historic Building Survey was prepared in 1989, and is available online at: http://www.cityofsanmateo.org/documentcenter/ View/47850 Because of the large number of structures, the Survey focused primarily on the oldest neighborhoods, most of which are located east of El Camino Real. Survey efforts were concentrated in the traditional downtown area, particularly along B Street and Third Avenue, and the neighborhoods of Central, East San Mateo, Hayward Park, San Mateo Heights, and North Central. Other areas west of El Camino Real and south of Hayward Park through 25th Avenue were visually surveyed only. One area of particular note not included in the Survey is the San Mateo Park residential neighborhood. The City currently has two identified historic districts, the Downtown Historic District and the Glazenwood Historic District. The Downtown area is of particular importance and interest with respect to historic structures. Overall, the Downtown maintains a 1930's character. The residential neighborhood of Glazenwood is a unique early 1920's development of Spanish Colonial Revival homes. Other areas of the City contain buildings of exceptional architectural interest or reflect local historical periods. In addition to the historic building survey work done in 1989, there have been other historic evaluations performed on structures in the City. These evaluations are prepared in conjunction with q:\cdd\planning\forms\planning application forms-guides and counter handouts\counter handouts on various zoning code related topics\historic resources info handout.docx

planning applications for alterations or demolition of existing structures over 45 years old. These evaluations have led to additional buildings being added to the City s inventory of historic structures. Historic buildings and structures are shown on General Plan Figure C/OS 5, along with their respective ratings of potential significance. There are six buildings in the City that are listed on the National Register of Historic Places (listed by official name of resource): Ernest Coxhead House on East Santa Inez; De Sabla Teahouse and Tea Garden on De Sabla Avenue; Hotel Saint Matthew on Second Avenue; National Bank of San Mateo on B Street: Vollers House on North Claremont Street; and the US Post Office on South Ellsworth Street. Historic Preservation Ordinance The City s Historic Preservation Ordinance was adopted in 1995 based on the City s General Plan policies and Downtown Area Plan. The Ordinance applies to the following: All buildings in the City that are classified as individually eligible for the National Register. This includes 24 buildings in the City located outside of the Downtown; and, All buildings in the Downtown Area Plan area that are classified as individually eligible for the National Register and all contributor buildings within the Downtown Historic District. A list of these buildings, which was adopted by the City Council, is included on pages 3 and 4. A map of the buildings and historical designations of properties in the City s Downtown Historic District is on page 5. The City s Historic Preservation Ordinance stipulates the following: National Register - Individually Eligible Buildings. A planning application for Site Plan and Architectural Review is required for an exterior facade modification, exterior alteration, or building addition. This includes any exterior building changes that are subject to a building permit, including replacement of doors, windows, exterior Page 2 materials, etc. Construction work that doesn t require a permit, such as standard exterior painting, would typically not require a planning application. Downtown Historic District - Contributor Buildings. Most minor facade modifications, in accordance with Zoning Code Section 27.08.031, which conform to the adopted Downtown Retail Core and Downtown Historic District Design Guidelines, area exempt from the requirements for a Site Plan and Architectural Review planning application. However, a Site Plan and Architectural Review application may be required in cases involving facade modifications which may adversely affect the exterior architectural characteristics or historic or aesthetic value of the historic structure, its site or surroundings. All planning applications involving a designated historic resource are required to be evaluated by an independent architectural historian hired directly by the City to review the project and determine that the project is in compliance with the Secretary of Interior s Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Structure. Additionally, all exterior modifications of individually eligible and contributor buildings and new buildings in the Downtown Retail Core subarea of the Downtown Area Plan (e.g., exterior building additions and alterations) will be evaluated by the architectural historian to ensure that the project also conforms with the Downtown Retail Core and the Downtown Historic District Design Guidelines. The Ordinance also includes specific requirements related to the demolition of a building that is subject to the Ordinance. A planning application for a Historic Building Demolition Permit is required to be approved by the City Council, and specific findings made to approve the permit. Additionally, demolition of any historic resource is subject to additional review and the requirements of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). California Environmental Quality Act In addition to the City s Historic Preservation Ordinance, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the Guidelines for Implementing CEQA (State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15064.5) provide additional legal requirements for evaluation of

historic properties for purposes of CEQA. CEQA applies to all discretionary projects, such as Planning Applications. It does not apply to building permits which are ministerial actions. CEQA is a state law requiring the evaluation of the potential impacts of proposed development projects on of all aspects of the environment (including historic resources) by requiring agencies to prepare informational documents disclosing the environmental effects of a proposed project before it can be approved. The classification of historical resource is applicable when the property meets the terms of the definitions in Section 21084.1 of the CEQA Statute and Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. Historical Resources under CEQA includes the following: Properties listed in or formally determined to be eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or listed in a local register of historic resources (which for the City of San Mateo, is the Historic Building Survey (1989) and the City s General Plan Figure C/OS 5). Properties that are determined to be eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources. Determinations of historical significance require that several factors are considered including: the property's history (both construction and use); the history and context of the surrounding community; an association with important persons or uses; the number of resources associated with the property; the potential for the resources to be the work of a master architect, builder, craftsman, landscape gardener, or artist; the historical, architectural or landscape influences that have shaped the property s design and its pattern of use; and alterations that have taken place, and lastly how these changes may have affected the property s historical integrity. To be eligible for the California Register historic resources must possess both historic significance and retain historic integrity. Under CEQA, evaluation of the potential for proposed projects to impact historical resources is Page 3 a two step process: the first is to determine whether the property is an historical resource as defined in CEQA; and, if it is an historical resource, the second is to evaluate whether the action or project proposed by the sponsor would cause a substantial adverse change to the historical resource. The responses to these questions will have a bearing not only on the type of environmental documentation that will be necessary but also how the property will be analyzed. Under CEQA, the City has a legal responsibility to made a determination as to whether a specific building is an historical resource if the building is subject to a planning application, unless no alterations are proposed to the structure. The City generally requires that an applicant or property pay for the full cost of a historic resource evaluation by an independent architectural historian hired directly by the City if there are substantial changes proposed to any structure that is over 45 years old. List of Buildings in San Mateo that are Individually Eligible for the National Register Downtown Area 215-229 Second Ave 36 E. Third Ave 51 E. Third Ave 205-221 E. Third Ave (220 E. Third Ave, URM Building) 100 S. B. Street 113 S. B. Street (URM Building) 164 S. B. Street 201 S. B. Street 709 S. B. Street 16 Baldwin Ave 415 S. Claremont Street 940 S. Claremont Street 273 Railroad Ave Outside the Downtown 353 N. Claremont Street 5 N. Delaware Street 12 N. Delaware Street

40 N. Delaware Street 501 N. Delaware Street 506 N. Delaware Street 2 S. Delaware Street 45 S. Delaware Street 150 N. El Camino Real 212 S. El Camino Real 2454 S. El Camino Real 20 El Cerrito Ave 100 N. Ellsworth Ave 117 N. Ellsworth Ave 202 N. Ellsworth Ave 137 Elm Street 245 Grand Ave 510 S. Grant St 510-512 S. Idaho St 809 Lawrence Rd 1312 Palm Ave 1641 Palm Ave 37 E. Santa Inez Ave 225 Tilton Ave Page 4