SUBJECT: NFPA 70 Second Draft TC Ballot Final Results (A2016)

National Fire Protection Association 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02169-7471 Phone: 617-770-3000 Fax: 617-770-0700 www.nfpa.org TO: NEC Code-Making Panel 3 FROM: Kimberly Shea, Administrator, Technical Projects DATE: January 25, 2016 SUBJECT: NFPA 70 Second Draft TC Ballot Final Results (A2016) According to the final ballot results, all ballot items received the necessary affirmative votes to pass ballot with the exception of SR No. 601. As a result, the revision is now designated as Committee Comment No. 601 and will not be included in the Second Draft. Second Revision 601 has no related First Revision, therefore, there will be no supplemental ballot. The attached report contains Committee Comment No. 601 and the SRs created by Panel 3 with final ballot counts and voting comments. To pass ballot, each revision requires: (1) a simple majority of those eligible to vote and (2) an affirmative vote of 2 /3 of ballots returned. See Sections 3.3.4.3 (c) and 4.3.10.1 of the Regulations Governing the Development of NFPA Standards. NEC Panel 3 Final Ballot Results - Page 1 of 58-01/28/16

of 2 1/25/2016 10:16 AM Committee Comment No. 601-NFPA 70-2015 [ Section No. 300.4 [Excluding any Sub-Sections] ] This was a Second Revision that failed ballot. Where subject to physical damage, conductors, raceways, and cables shall be protected. Informational note: Minor damage to a raceway, cable armor or cable insulation does not necessarily violate the integrity of either the contained conductors or the conductors insulation. Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: CMP 3 Organization: [ Not Specified ] Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Mon Nov 02 11:49:07 EST 2015 Committee Statement Committee Statement: Response Message: The informational note provides guidance to an electrical inspector that minor (superficial) damage to the jacket of a cable is not an issue. The first sentence of the proposed informational note is unnecessary since it states the obvious that physical damage doesn t just occur from normal building operation. Public Comment No. 1028-NFPA 70-2015 [Section No. 300.4 [Excluding any Sub-Sections]] Ballot Results This item has failed ballot 15 Eligible Voters 0 Not Returned 6 Negative with Comments 9 Affirmative All 0 Affirmative with Comments 0 Abstention Negative with Comment Brewer, Larry G. Any damaged cable needs to be changed Casparro, Paul J. This informational Note does not provide useful guidance and is "making an interpretation" which is in violation of the NEC Style Manual, Section 3.1.3. It is not possible to visually determine the integrity of the conductors when the metallic or nonmetallic jacket is damaged. "Minor" damage is not defined and the AHJ already has permission to NEC Panel 3 Final Ballot Results - Page 2 of 58-01/28/16

of 2 1/25/2016 10:16 AM make a determination per NEC 90.4 Corbin, Adam D. This Informational Note does not provide useful guidance and is "making an interpretation" which is in violation of the NEC Style Manual, Section3.1.3. It is not possible to visually determine the integrity of the conductors when the metallic or nonmetallic jacket is damaged. "Minor damage is not defined and the AHJ already has permission to make a determination per NEC 90.4. This situation must be determined on a case-by-case situation. "Minor damage" is not defined and is open to wide interpretation. Keden, Ray R. This Informational Note does not provide useful guidance and is "making an interpretation" which is in violation of the NEC Style Manual, Section3.1.3. It is not possible to visually determine the integrity of the conductors when the metallic or nonmetallic jacket is damaged. "Minor damage is not defined and the AHJ already has permission to make a determination per NEC 90.4. This situation must be determined on a case-by-case situation. "Minor damage" is not defined and is open to wide interpretation Pace, David A. The term "minor damage" is not a defined term and is open to broad interpretation. The AHJ already has the authority to made a determination whether or not external damage may affect the conductors within. This is not necessary and will cause confusion. Straniero, George A. This Informational Note does not provide useful guidance. It is difficult to visually determine the integrity of the conductors when the metallic or nonmetallic jacket is damaged. Affirmative All Bassett, Douglas P. Brunner, William A. Burlison, Steven D. Clary, Shane M. Mills, T. David Owen, Steven J. Scearce, Susan Newman Sleights, John E. Stene, Susan L. NEC Panel 3 Final Ballot Results - Page 3 of 58-01/28/16

of 55 1/28/2016 2:20 PM Second Revision No. 623-NFPA 70-2015 [ Section No. 300.5(A) ] NEC Panel 3 Final Ballot Results - Page 4 of 58-01/28/16

of 55 1/28/2016 2:20 PM (A) Minimum Cover Requirements. NEC Panel 3 Final Ballot Results - Page 5 of 58-01/28/16

of 55 1/28/2016 2:20 PM Direct-buried cable, or conduit, or other raceways shall be installed to meet the minimum cover requirements of Table 300.5. Table 300.5 Minimum Cover Requirements, 0 to 1000 Volts, Nominal, Burial in Millimeters (Inches) Location of Wiring Method or Circuit All locations not specified below In trench below 50 mm (2 in.) thick concrete or equivalent Column 1 Direct Burial Cables or Conductors Column 2 Rigid Metal Conduit or Intermediate Metal Conduit Type of Wiring Method or Circuit Column 3 Nonmetallic Raceways Listed for Direct Burial Without Concrete Encasement or Other Approved Raceways Column 4 Residential Branch Circuits Rated 120 Volts or Less with GFCI Protection and Maximum Overcurrent Protection of 20 Amperes Column 5 Circuits for Control of Irrigation and Landscape Lighting Limited to Not More Than 30 Volts and Installed with Type UF or in Other Identified Cable or Raceway mm in. mm in. mm in. mm in. mm in. 600 24 150 6 450 18 300 12 150 a, b 6 a, b 450 18 150 6 300 12 150 6 150 6 Under a building 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Under minimum of 102 mm (4 in.) thick concrete exterior slab with no vehicular traffic and the slab extending not less than 152 mm (6 in.) beyond the underground installation (in raceway or Type MC or Type MI cable identified for direct burial) 450 18 100 4 100 4 (in raceway or Type MC or Type MI cable identified for direct burial) (in raceway or Type MC or Type MI cable identified for direct burial) 150 6 150 6 (direct burial) (direct burial) 100 4 100 4 (in raceway) (in raceway) Under streets, highways, roads, 600 alleys, driveways, 24 600 24 600 24 600 24 600 24 and parking lots One- and two-family dwelling driveways and outdoor parking areas, and used only for dwellingrelated purposes 450 18 450 18 450 18 300 12 450 18 NEC Panel 3 Final Ballot Results - Page 6 of 58-01/28/16

of 55 1/28/2016 2:20 PM In or under airport runways, including adjacent 450 areas where 18 450 18 450 18 450 18 450 18 trespassing prohibited a A lesser depth shall be permitted where specified in the installation instructions of a listed low-voltage lighting system. b A depth of 150 mm (6 in.) shall be permitted for pool, spa, and fountain lighting, installed in a nonmetallic raceway, limited to not more than 30 volts where part of a listed low-voltage lighting system. Notes: 1. Cover is defined as the shortest distance in millimeters mm (inches in. ) measured between a point on the top surface of any direct-buried conductor, cable, conduit, or other raceway and the top surface of finished grade, concrete, or similar cover. 2. Raceways approved for burial only where concrete encased shall require concrete envelope not less than 50 mm (2 in.) thick. 3. Lesser depths shall be permitted where cables and conductors rise for terminations or splices or where access is otherwise required. 4. Where one of the wiring method types listed in Columns 1 through 3 is used for one of the circuit types in Columns 4 and 5, the shallowest depth of burial shall be permitted. 5. Where solid rock prevents compliance with the cover depths specified in this table, the wiring shall be installed in a metal raceway, or a nonmetallic raceway permitted for direct burial. The raceways shall be covered by a minimum of 50 mm (2 in.) of concrete extending down to rock. Supplemental Information File Name 300.5_SR623_LM.docx Description Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: CMP 3 Organization: [ Not Specified ] Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Tue Nov 03 10:35:31 PST 2015 Committee Statement Committee Statement: Response Message: Swimming pool, spa, and fountain low voltage lighting in a nonmetallic raceway or similar installation should not be required to be installed any deeper than any other Column 5 less than 30 volt low voltage landscape lighting. Since the actual text covering pools, spas and fountains is not located in Column 5, there are inspectors who require the nonmetallic raceway containing these low voltage lighting conductors to be installed at an 18-inch depth. Ballot Results This item has passed ballot NEC Panel 3 Final Ballot Results - Page 7 of 58-01/28/16

of 55 1/28/2016 2:20 PM 14 Eligible Voters 0 Not Returned 12 Affirmative All 2 Affirmative with Comments 0 Negative with Comments 0 Abstention Affirmative All Brunner, William A. Burlison, Steven D. Casparro, Paul J. Clary, Shane M. Keden, Ray R. Mills, T. David Owen, Steven J. Pace, David A. Scearce, Susan Newman Sleights, John E. Stene, Susan L. Straniero, George A. Affirmative with Comment Brewer, Larry G. Needed for Clarification Corbin, Adam D. I agree. NEC Panel 3 Final Ballot Results - Page 8 of 58-01/28/16

of 55 1/28/2016 2:20 PM Second Revision No. 602-NFPA 70-2015 [ Section No. 300.7(B) ] (B) Expansion, Expansion-Deflection, and Deflection Fittings. Raceways shall be provided with expansion, expansion-deflection, or deflection fittings where necessary to compensate for thermal expansion, deflection, and contraction. Informational Note: Table 352.44 and Table 355.44 provide the expansion information for polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and for reinforced thermosetting resin conduit (RTRC), respectively. A nominal number for steel conduit can be determined by multiplying the expansion length in Table 352.44 by 0.20. The coefficient of expansion for steel electrical metallic tubing, intermediate metal conduit, and rigid metal conduit is 1.170 10-5 (0.0000117 mm per mm of conduit for each C in temperature change) [0.650 10-5 (0.0000065 in. per inch of conduit for each F in temperature change)]. A nominal number for aluminum conduit and aluminum electrical metallic tubing can be determined by multiplying the expansion length in Table 352.44 by 0.40. The coefficient of expansion for aluminum electrical metallic tubing and aluminum rigid metal conduit is 2.34 10-5 (0.0000234 mm per mm of conduit for each C in temperature change) [1.30 10-5 (0.000013 in. per inch of conduit for each F in temperature change)]. Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: CMP 3 Organization: [ Not Specified ] Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Mon Nov 02 13:01:37 EST 2015 Committee Statement Committee Statement: Response Message: The revised text makes it clear to inspectors, designers, and contactors that expansion-deflection and deflection fittings are acceptable to be used with raceways to address thermal expansion, deflection, and contraction. Revising the text also requires a revision of the title to this subsection. Public Comment No. 99-NFPA 70-2015 [Section No. 300.7(B)] Ballot Results This item has passed ballot 14 Eligible Voters 0 Not Returned 12 Affirmative All 1 Affirmative with Comments 1 Negative with Comments 0 Abstention NEC Panel 3 Final Ballot Results - Page 9 of 58-01/28/16

of 55 1/28/2016 2:20 PM Affirmative All Brunner, William A. Burlison, Steven D. Casparro, Paul J. Clary, Shane M. Keden, Ray R. Mills, T. David Owen, Steven J. Pace, David A. Scearce, Susan Newman Sleights, John E. Stene, Susan L. Straniero, George A. Affirmative with Comment Corbin, Adam D. I agree. Negative with Comment Brewer, Larry G. the product is listed for this application. not needed NEC Panel 3 Final Ballot Results - Page 10 of 58-01/28/16

of 55 1/28/2016 2:20 PM Second Revision No. 603-NFPA 70-2015 [ Section No. 300.11(B)(1) ] (1) Fire-Rated Assemblies. Wiring located within the cavity of a fire-rated floor ceiling or roof ceiling assembly shall not be secured to, or supported by, the ceiling assembly, including the ceiling support wires. An independent means of secure support shall be provided and shall be permitted to be attached to the assembly. Where independent support wires are used, they shall be distinguishable by color, tagging, or other effective means from those that are part of the fire-rated design. Exception: The ceiling support system shall be permitted to support wiring and equipment that have been tested as part of the fire-rated assembly. Informational Note: One method of determining fire rating is testing in accordance with ANSI/ASTM E119-2014 2015, Method for Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials. Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: CMP 3 Organization: [ Not Specified ] Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Mon Nov 02 13:48:28 EST 2015 Committee Statement Committee Statement: The ANSI/ASTM E119 has been changed from 2014 to 2015. Response Message: Public Comment No. 122-NFPA 70-2015 [Section No. 300.11(B)(1)] Public Comment No. 801-NFPA 70-2015 [Section No. 300.11(B)(1)] Ballot Results This item has passed ballot 14 Eligible Voters 0 Not Returned 12 Affirmative All 1 Affirmative with Comments 1 Negative with Comments 0 Abstention Affirmative All Brunner, William A. Burlison, Steven D. Casparro, Paul J. NEC Panel 3 Final Ballot Results - Page 11 of 58-01/28/16

of 55 1/28/2016 2:20 PM Clary, Shane M. Keden, Ray R. Mills, T. David Owen, Steven J. Pace, David A. Scearce, Susan Newman Sleights, John E. Stene, Susan L. Straniero, George A. Affirmative with Comment Corbin, Adam D. I agree. Negative with Comment Brewer, Larry G. Hard for AHJ to enforce NEC Panel 3 Final Ballot Results - Page 12 of 58-01/28/16

0 of 55 1/28/2016 2:20 PM Second Revision No. 604-NFPA 70-2015 [ Section No. 300.19(A) ] (A) Spacing Intervals Maximum. Conductors in vertical raceways shall be supported if the vertical rise exceeds the values in Table 300.19(A). At least one support method shall be provided for each conductor or cable assembly at the top of the vertical raceway or as close to the top as practical. Intermediate supports shall be provided as necessary to limit supported conductor lengths to not greater than those values specified in Table 300.19(A). Exception: Steel wire armor cable shall be supported at the top of the riser with a cable support that clamps the steel wire armor. A safety device shall be permitted at the lower end of the riser to hold the cable in the event there is slippage of the cable in the wire-armored cable support. Additional wedge-type supports shall be permitted to relieve the strain on the equipment terminals caused by expansion of the cable under load. Table 300.19(A) Spacings for Conductor Supports Conductors Conductor Size Support of Conductors in Vertical Raceways Aluminum or Copper-Clad Aluminum Copper m ft m ft 18 AWG through 8 AWG Not greater than 30 100 30 100 6 AWG through 1/0 AWG Not greater than 60 200 30 100 2/0 AWG through 4/0 AWG Not greater than 55 180 25 80 Over 4/0 AWG through 350 kcmil Over 350 kcmil through 500 kcmil Over 500 kcmil through 750 kcmil Not greater than 41 135 18 60 Not greater than 36 120 15 50 Not greater than 28 95 12 40 Over 750 kcmil Not greater than 26 85 11 35 Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: CMP 3 Organization: [ Not Specified ] Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Mon Nov 02 13:51:21 EST 2015 Committee Statement Committee Statement: Response Message: Deleting cable assembly ensures that each individual conductor is supported at the top of a vertical raceway. NEC Panel 3 Final Ballot Results - Page 13 of 58-01/28/16

1 of 55 1/28/2016 2:20 PM Public Comment No. 1151-NFPA 70-2015 [Section No. 300.19(A)] Ballot Results This item has passed ballot 14 Eligible Voters 0 Not Returned 12 Affirmative All 2 Affirmative with Comments 0 Negative with Comments 0 Abstention Affirmative All Brunner, William A. Burlison, Steven D. Casparro, Paul J. Clary, Shane M. Keden, Ray R. Mills, T. David Owen, Steven J. Pace, David A. Scearce, Susan Newman Sleights, John E. Stene, Susan L. Straniero, George A. Affirmative with Comment Brewer, Larry G. Needed for added support Corbin, Adam D. I agree. NEC Panel 3 Final Ballot Results - Page 14 of 58-01/28/16

2 of 55 1/28/2016 2:20 PM Second Revision No. 605-NFPA 70-2015 [ Section No. 300.22(C)(3) ] (3) Equipment. Electrical equipment with a metal enclosure, or electrical equipment with a nonmetallic enclosure listed for use within an air-handling space and having low smoke and heat release properties, and associated wiring material suitable for the ambient temperature shall be permitted to be installed in such other space unless prohibited elsewhere in this Code. Informational Note: One method to determine low smoke and heat release properties is that the equipment exhibits a maximum peak optical density of 0.50 or less, an average optical density of 0.15 or less, and a peak heat release rate of 100kW or less when tested in accordance with ANSI/UL 2043-2008 2013, Fire Test for Heat and Visible Smoke Release for Discrete Products and Their Accessories Installed in Air-Handling Spaces. Exception: Integral fan systems shall be permitted where specifically identified for use within an air-handling space. Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: CMP 3 Organization: [ Not Specified ] Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Mon Nov 02 14:16:41 EST 2015 Committee Statement Committee Statement: Response Message: This updates the informational note to the latest version of UL 2043. ANSI has been retained in the title of the UL Standard. Public Comment No. 163-NFPA 70-2015 [Section No. 300.22(C)(3)] Ballot Results This item has passed ballot 14 Eligible Voters 0 Not Returned 12 Affirmative All 2 Affirmative with Comments 0 Negative with Comments 0 Abstention Affirmative All Brunner, William A. Burlison, Steven D. NEC Panel 3 Final Ballot Results - Page 15 of 58-01/28/16

3 of 55 1/28/2016 2:20 PM Casparro, Paul J. Clary, Shane M. Keden, Ray R. Mills, T. David Owen, Steven J. Pace, David A. Scearce, Susan Newman Sleights, John E. Stene, Susan L. Straniero, George A. Affirmative with Comment Brewer, Larry G. updated to support other codes for smoke safety Corbin, Adam D. I agree. NEC Panel 3 Final Ballot Results - Page 16 of 58-01/28/16

4 of 55 1/28/2016 2:20 PM Second Revision No. 624-NFPA 70-2015 [ Section No. 300.37 ] 300.37 Aboveground Wiring Methods. Aboveground conductors shall be installed in rigid metal conduit, in intermediate metal conduit, in electrical metallic tubing, in RTRC and PVC conduit, in cable trays, in auxiliary gutters, as busways, as cablebus, in other identified raceways, or as exposed runs of metal-clad cable suitable for the use and purpose. In locations accessible to qualified persons only, exposed runs of Type MV cables, bare conductors, and bare busbars shall also be permitted. Busbars shall be permitted to be either copper or aluminum. Exception: Airfield lighting cable used in series circuits that are powered by regulators and installed in restricted airport lighting vaults shall be permitted as exposed cable installations. Informational Note: FAA L-824 cables installed as exposed runs within a restricted vault area are common applications. Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: CMP 3 Organization: [ Not Specified ] Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Tue Nov 03 11:12:31 PST 2015 Committee Statement Committee Statement: Response Message: This revision recognizes that these cables are often installed exposed within a restricted airport lighting vault to facilitate easy access for modifications and reconnections during emergency situations. Public Comment No. 115-NFPA 70-2015 [Section No. 300.37] Public Comment No. 108-NFPA 70-2015 [Section No. 300.37] Public Comment No. 113-NFPA 70-2015 [Section No. 300.37] Public Comment No. 246-NFPA 70-2015 [Section No. 300.37] Public Comment No. 1472-NFPA 70-2015 [Section No. 300.37] Public Comment No. 1496-NFPA 70-2015 [Section No. 300.37] Ballot Results This item has passed ballot 14 Eligible Voters 0 Not Returned 12 Affirmative All 1 Affirmative with Comments NEC Panel 3 Final Ballot Results - Page 17 of 58-01/28/16

5 of 55 1/28/2016 2:20 PM 1 Negative with Comments 0 Abstention Affirmative All Brunner, William A. Burlison, Steven D. Casparro, Paul J. Clary, Shane M. Keden, Ray R. Mills, T. David Owen, Steven J. Pace, David A. Scearce, Susan Newman Sleights, John E. Stene, Susan L. Straniero, George A. Affirmative with Comment Corbin, Adam D. I agree. Negative with Comment Brewer, Larry G. FCC rules do not allow NEC Panel 3 Final Ballot Results - Page 18 of 58-01/28/16

6 of 55 1/28/2016 2:20 PM Second Revision No. 606-NFPA 70-2015 [ Section No. 590.4(G) ] (G) Splices. A box, conduit body, or other enclosure, with a cover installed, shall be required for all splices except where: (1) The circuit conductors being spliced are all from nonmetallic multiconductor cord or cable assemblies, provided that the equipment grounding continuity is maintained with or without the box. (2) The circuit conductors being spliced are all from metal sheathed cable assemblies terminated in listed fittings that mechanically secure the cable sheath to maintain effective electrical continuity. Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: CMP 3 Organization: [ Not Specified ] Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Mon Nov 02 16:08:00 EST 2015 Committee Statement Committee Statement: Response Message: The addition of nonmetallic ensures that (1) applies to splices of multiconductor cords or cable assemblies with a nonmetallic jacket. Public Comment No. 826-NFPA 70-2015 [Section No. 590.4(G)] Ballot Results This item has passed ballot 14 Eligible Voters 0 Not Returned 12 Affirmative All 1 Affirmative with Comments 1 Negative with Comments 0 Abstention Affirmative All Brunner, William A. Burlison, Steven D. Casparro, Paul J. Clary, Shane M. Keden, Ray R. NEC Panel 3 Final Ballot Results - Page 19 of 58-01/28/16

7 of 55 1/28/2016 2:20 PM Mills, T. David Owen, Steven J. Pace, David A. Scearce, Susan Newman Sleights, John E. Stene, Susan L. Straniero, George A. Affirmative with Comment Corbin, Adam D. I agree. Negative with Comment Brewer, Larry G. All splices need to be covered for fire spread protection NEC Panel 3 Final Ballot Results - Page 20 of 58-01/28/16

8 of 55 1/28/2016 2:20 PM Second Revision No. 607-NFPA 70-2015 [ Section No. 590.4(J) ] (J) Support. Cable assemblies and flexible cords and cables shall be supported in place at intervals that ensure that they will be protected from physical damage. Support shall be in the form of staples, cable ties, straps, or similar type fittings installed so as not to cause damage. Cable assemblies and flexible cords and cables installed as branch circuits or feeders shall not be installed on the floor or on the ground. Extension cords shall not be required to comply with 590.4(J). Multiconductor cord or cable of a type identified in Table 400.4 for hard usage or extra-hard usage shall not be required to comply with 590.4(J). Vegetation shall not be used for support of overhead spans of branch circuits or feeders. Exception: For holiday lighting in accordance with 590.3(B), where the conductors or cables are arranged with strain relief devices, tension take-up devices, or other approved means to avoid damage from the movement of the live vegetation, trees shall be permitted to be used for support of overhead spans of branch-circuit conductors or cables. Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: CMP 3 Organization: [ Not Specified ] Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Mon Nov 02 16:11:00 EST 2015 Committee Statement Committee Statement: Response Message: Multiconductor cords or cables that are identified in Table 400.4 for hard usage or extra hard usage shall not be required to comply with 590.4(J) as far as support is concerned. The extra text helps clarify what types of cords are acceptable for this temporary application. Public Comment No. 1143-NFPA 70-2015 [Section No. 590.4(J)] Ballot Results This item has passed ballot 14 Eligible Voters 0 Not Returned 12 Affirmative All 1 Affirmative with Comments 1 Negative with Comments 0 Abstention Affirmative All Brunner, William A. NEC Panel 3 Final Ballot Results - Page 21 of 58-01/28/16

9 of 55 1/28/2016 2:20 PM Burlison, Steven D. Casparro, Paul J. Clary, Shane M. Keden, Ray R. Mills, T. David Owen, Steven J. Pace, David A. Scearce, Susan Newman Sleights, John E. Stene, Susan L. Straniero, George A. Affirmative with Comment Corbin, Adam D. I agree. Negative with Comment Brewer, Larry G. Already covered in NEC NEC Panel 3 Final Ballot Results - Page 22 of 58-01/28/16

0 of 55 1/28/2016 2:20 PM Second Revision No. 608-NFPA 70-2015 [ Section No. 590.6(B) ] (B) Use of Other Outlets. For temporary wiring installations, receptacles, other than those covered by 590.6(A)(1) through (A)(3) used to supply temporary power to equipment used by personnel during construction, remodeling, maintenance, repair, or demolition of buildings, structures, or equipment, or similar activities, shall have protection in accordance with (B)(1), (B)(2), or the assured equipment grounding conductor program in accordance with (B)(2) (3). (1) GFCI Protection. Ground-fault circuit-interrupter protection for personnel. (2) SPGFCI Protection. Special purpose ground-fault circuit-interrupter protection for personnel. (3) Assured Equipment Grounding Conductor Program. A written assured equipment grounding conductor program continuously enforced at the site by one or more designated persons to ensure that equipment grounding conductors for all cord sets, receptacles that are not a part of the permanent wiring of the building or structure, and equipment connected by cord and plug are installed and maintained in accordance with the applicable requirements of 250.114, 250.138, 406.4(C), and 590.4(D). (a) The following tests shall be performed on all cord sets, receptacles that are not part of the permanent wiring of the building or structure, and cord-and-plug-connected equipment required to be connected to an equipment grounding conductor: (1) All equipment grounding conductors shall be tested for continuity and shall be electrically continuous. (2) Each receptacle and attachment plug shall be tested for correct attachment of the equipment grounding conductor. The equipment grounding conductor shall be connected to its proper terminal. (3) All required tests shall be performed as follows: a. Before first use on site b. When there is evidence of damage c. Before equipment is returned to service following any repairs d. At intervals not exceeding 3 months (b) The tests required in item (2) (3) (a) shall be recorded and made available to the authority having jurisdiction. Supplemental Information File Name Description 590.6_B_SR608_JS.docx Word document shows changes made in SR 608 Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: CMP 3 Organization: [ Not Specified ] Street Address: City: State: Zip: NEC Panel 3 Final Ballot Results - Page 23 of 58-01/28/16

1 of 55 1/28/2016 2:20 PM Submittal Date: Mon Nov 02 16:19:21 EST 2015 Committee Statement Committee Statement: Response Message: The changes to 590.6(B) involving special purpose ground-fault circuit-interrupter protection (SPGFCI) for personnel are accepted since Panel 2 has accepted a new definition of SPGFCI, however, Equipment Ground-Fault Protective Devices (EGFPD) is listed by UL for equipment protection, not personnel protection. Since the requirements in 590.6 are for protection of personnel, the changes suggested for EGFPD are not accepted. Public Comment No. 615-NFPA 70-2015 [Section No. 590.6(B)] Ballot Results This item has passed ballot 14 Eligible Voters 0 Not Returned 11 Affirmative All 1 Affirmative with Comments 2 Negative with Comments 0 Abstention Affirmative All Brunner, William A. Burlison, Steven D. Casparro, Paul J. Clary, Shane M. Keden, Ray R. Mills, T. David Owen, Steven J. Scearce, Susan Newman Sleights, John E. Stene, Susan L. Straniero, George A. Affirmative with Comment Corbin, Adam D. I agree. However, the committee statement needs to be revised by changing the "is" after (EGFPD) to "are" as the subject is plural. Negative with Comment Brewer, Larry G. NFPA 70 E coveres this Pace, David A. NEC Panel 3 Final Ballot Results - Page 24 of 58-01/28/16

2 of 55 1/28/2016 2:20 PM Adding SPGFCI's to this section will cause confusion and potentially create an unsafe working environment if not applied correctly. Having the two GFCI devices that provide very different protection levels will not be understood by the general public. Class A GFCI devices should be the only device allowed to be used for personnel protection for the circuits described in this article. NEC Panel 3 Final Ballot Results - Page 25 of 58-01/28/16

3 of 55 1/28/2016 2:20 PM Second Revision No. 609-NFPA 70-2015 [ Section No. 725.3(C) ] (C) Ducts, Plenums, and Other Air-Handling Spaces. Class 1, Class 2, and Class 3 circuits installed in ducts, plenums, or other space used for environmental air shall comply with 300.22. Exception No. 1: As permitted in Class 2 and Class 3 cables selected in accordance with Table 725.154 and installed in accordance with 725.135(B) and 300.22(B), Exception shall be permitted to be installed in ducts specifically fabricated for environmental air.. Exception No. 2: Class 2 and Class 3 cables selected in accordance with Table 725.154 and installed in accordance with 725.135(C) shall be permitted to be installed in other spaces used for environmental air (plenums). Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: CMP 3 Organization: [ Not Specified ] Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Mon Nov 02 16:24:52 EST 2015 Committee Statement Committee Statement: The First Revision FR 614 modified 300.22(B) by adding a new Exception indicating Class 2 and Class 3 cables are permitted in ducts specifically fabricated for environmental air with two conditions (a) The wiring methods or cabling systems shall be permitted only if necessary to connect to equipment or devices associated with the direct action upon, or sensing of the contained air and (b) The total length of such wiring methods or cabling systems shall not exceed 1.2 m (4 ft). These two conditions correspond to Section 4.3.4.2 in NFPA 90A 2015. The 2017 First Revision FR 614 in 300.22(B) reads as follows: Exception: Wiring methods and cabling systems, listed for use in other spaces used for environmental air (plenums), shall be permitted to be installed in ducts specifically fabricated for environmental air-handling purposes under the following conditions: (a) The wiring methods or cabling systems shall be permitted only if necessary to connect to equipment or devices associated with the direct action upon, or sensing of the contained air and (b) The total length of such wiring methods or cabling systems shall not exceed 1.2 m (4 ft). Class 2 or Class 3 plenum rated cable is acceptable in ducts specifically fabricated for environmental air but only where connecting to equipment used to sense or has direction action on the contained air and limited to a maximum of 4foot length based on NFPA 90A. Response Message: Public Comment No. 460-NFPA 70-2015 [Section No. 725.3(C)] Ballot Results NEC Panel 3 Final Ballot Results - Page 26 of 58-01/28/16

4 of 55 1/28/2016 2:20 PM This item has passed ballot 15 Eligible Voters 0 Not Returned 13 Affirmative All 1 Affirmative with Comments 1 Negative with Comments 0 Abstention Affirmative All Bassett, Douglas Brunner, William A. Burlison, Steven D. Casparro, Paul J. Clary, Shane M. Keden, Ray R. Mills, T. David Owen, Steven J. Pace, David A. Scearce, Susan Newman Sleights, John E. Stene, Susan L. Straniero, George A. Affirmative with Comment Brewer, Larry G. Added to support NFPA 90 Negative with Comment Corbin, Adam D. It is understood to limit the installation of cables in ducts as much as possible, however 4 feet in a total system with multiple devices is impractical. Limiting the length to 4 feet per device makes more sense. NEC Panel 3 Final Ballot Results - Page 27 of 58-01/28/16

5 of 55 1/28/2016 2:20 PM Second Revision No. 610-NFPA 70-2015 [ New Section after 725.121(B) ] (C) The power sources for limited power circuits in 725.121(A)(3) and limited power circuits for listed audio/video information technology (equipment) and listed industrial equipment in 725.121(A)(4) shall have a label indicating the maximum voltage and current output for each connection point. The effective date shall be January 1, 2018. Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: CMP 3 Organization: [ Not Specified ] Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Mon Nov 02 17:03:37 EST 2015 Committee Statement Committee Statement: Response Message: This new section addresses labeling of limited power circuit output connection points on listed IT equipment and listed industrial control panels and equipment. Bundling of large numbers of Class 2 conductors from IT servers and other similar IT and industrial equipment can create safety issues with very small current levels so having the output ports identified with the current and voltage rating is critical so the installer can connect the proper cable types. Labeling the output connections will permit the installer to have ready access to the current and voltage levels at the point of connection at the equipment, rather than internally within the equipment. The effective date was inserted to allow the manufacturers to comply with this requirement. Public Comment No. 1351-NFPA 70-2015 [New Section after 725.121] Ballot Results This item has passed ballot 15 Eligible Voters 0 Not Returned 11 Affirmative All 3 Affirmative with Comments 1 Negative with Comments 0 Abstention Affirmative All Bassett, Douglas Brunner, William A. Burlison, Steven D. NEC Panel 3 Final Ballot Results - Page 28 of 58-01/28/16

6 of 55 1/28/2016 2:20 PM Casparro, Paul J. Clary, Shane M. Keden, Ray R. Mills, T. David Owen, Steven J. Pace, David A. Sleights, John E. Straniero, George A. Affirmative with Comment Corbin, Adam D. I agree. Scearce, Susan Newman New Section (C) has been added and requires a title of the section per NEC Style Manual. New Section: 725.121(C) Marking Requirements Stene, Susan L. With the introduction of the ampacity tables that provide current limits for different AWG sizes and the optional use of LP cables that are rated for maximum current handling capabilities, the power source capabilities need to be identifiable by installers and AHJs in order to properly match the power source with the cable s current handling capabilities. It is our understanding based on the Committee Statement and the new 725.170 reference that it is intended to apply to powering over LAN cable applications that include power and data transmission. Negative with Comment Brewer, Larry G. If it has a NRTL, it has already been tested for voltage and current NEC Panel 3 Final Ballot Results - Page 29 of 58-01/28/16

7 of 55 1/28/2016 2:20 PM Second Revision No. 612-NFPA 70-2015 [ Section No. 725.133 ] 725.133 Installation of Conductors and Equipment in Cables, Compartments, Cable Trays, Enclosures, Manholes, Outlet Boxes, Device Boxes, Raceways, and Cable Routing Assemblies for Class 2 and Class 3 Circuits. Conductors and equipment for Class 2 and Class 3 circuits shall be installed in accordance with 725.135 through 725.143 725.144. Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: CMP 3 Organization: [ Not Specified ] Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Mon Nov 02 19:38:52 EST 2015 Committee Statement Committee Statement: The addition of 725.144 requires modification of 725.133. Response Message: Public Comment No. 689-NFPA 70-2015 [Section No. 725.133] Ballot Results This item has passed ballot 15 Eligible Voters 0 Not Returned 13 Affirmative All 1 Affirmative with Comments 1 Negative with Comments 0 Abstention Affirmative All Bassett, Douglas P. Brunner, William A. Burlison, Steven D. Casparro, Paul J. Clary, Shane M. Keden, Ray R. Mills, T. David Owen, Steven J. NEC Panel 3 Final Ballot Results - Page 30 of 58-01/28/16

8 of 55 1/28/2016 2:20 PM Pace, David A. Scearce, Susan Newman Sleights, John E. Stene, Susan L. Straniero, George A. Affirmative with Comment Corbin, Adam D. I agree. Negative with Comment Brewer, Larry G. Added words not necessary NEC Panel 3 Final Ballot Results - Page 31 of 58-01/28/16

9 of 55 1/28/2016 2:20 PM Second Revision No. 613-NFPA 70-2015 [ Section No. 725.135(A) ] (A) Listing. Class 2, Class 3, and PLTC cables installed in buildings shall be listed and labeled. Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: CMP 3 Organization: [ Not Specified ] Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Tue Nov 03 08:10:11 PST 2015 Committee Statement Committee Statement: Response Message: FR 638 already accepted this text. The panel reaffirms its stance on this topic: By adding the word "labeled," it will identify that listed products also need to be labeled. Both terms "listed" and "labeled" are defined in Article 100, but are not used consistently throughout the NEC. Public Comment No. 1423-NFPA 70-2015 [Section No. 725.135(A)] Ballot Results This item has passed ballot 15 Eligible Voters 0 Not Returned 13 Affirmative All 1 Affirmative with Comments 1 Negative with Comments 0 Abstention Affirmative All Bassett, Douglas P. Brunner, William A. Burlison, Steven D. Casparro, Paul J. Clary, Shane M. Keden, Ray R. Mills, T. David Owen, Steven J. NEC Panel 3 Final Ballot Results - Page 32 of 58-01/28/16

0 of 55 1/28/2016 2:20 PM Pace, David A. Scearce, Susan Newman Sleights, John E. Stene, Susan L. Straniero, George A. Affirmative with Comment Corbin, Adam D. I agree. Negative with Comment Brewer, Larry G. Already in NEC NEC Panel 3 Final Ballot Results - Page 33 of 58-01/28/16

1 of 55 1/28/2016 2:20 PM Second Revision No. 620-NFPA 70-2015 [ Section No. 725.135(K) ] (K) Other Building Locations. The following wires and cables shall be permitted to be installed in building locations other than the locations covered in 725.135(B) through (I): (1) Types CL2P, CL3P, CL2R, CL3R, CL2, CL3, and PLTC cables (2) A maximum of 3 m (10 ft) of exposed Type CL2X wires and cables in nonconcealed spaces (3) A maximum of 3 m (10 ft) of exposed Type CL3X wires and cables in nonconcealed spaces (4) Types CL2P, CL3P, CL2R, CL3R, CL2, CL3, and PLTC cables installed in the following: a. Plenum communications raceways b. Plenum cable routing assemblies c. Riser communications raceways d. Riser cable routing assemblies e. General-purpose communications raceways f. General-purpose cable routing assemblies (5) Types CL2P, CL3P, CL2R, CL3R, CL2, CL3, CL2X, CL3X, and PLTC cables installed in raceways recognized in Chapter 3 (6) Type CMUC undercarpet communications wires and cables installed under carpet, floor covering, modular tiles, or planks. Carpet, floor covering, modular tiles, or planks shall be free-floating and shall use interlocking means to attach to each other or shall be adhered to the floor and shall be attached with release-type adhesives, but shall not be attached to the floor using grout, nails, or screws modular flooring, and planks Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: CMP 3 Organization: [ Not Specified ] Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Tue Nov 03 09:59:16 PST 2015 Committee Statement Committee Statement: Response Message: Type CMUC under carpet communication wire and cables are permitted to be installed under carpet with an installation expansion for modular flooring and planks. The installation instructions for free floating and interlocking does not necessarily apply to all kinds of modular flooring and planks and could be overly restrictive. Public Comment No. 223-NFPA 70-2015 [Section No. 725.135(K)] Ballot Results This item has passed ballot NEC Panel 3 Final Ballot Results - Page 34 of 58-01/28/16

2 of 55 1/28/2016 2:20 PM 15 Eligible Voters 0 Not Returned 12 Affirmative All 1 Affirmative with Comments 2 Negative with Comments 0 Abstention Affirmative All Bassett, Douglas P. Brunner, William A. Burlison, Steven D. Clary, Shane M. Keden, Ray R. Mills, T. David Owen, Steven J. Pace, David A. Scearce, Susan Newman Sleights, John E. Stene, Susan L. Straniero, George A. Affirmative with Comment Corbin, Adam D. I agree. Negative with Comment Brewer, Larry G. Information is in installation instructions Casparro, Paul J. This PI has been accepted as a Second Revision (#620) without fully evaluating the substantiation provided by the submitter. Comments from the Panel Members prior to the vote for the First Revision indicated many had issues with this PI's substantiation and the concept of various floor coverings being installed over cables without maintaining access to the cables. UL's Fact Finding report, the substantiation for the First Revision, considered the heating effects of CMUC cables installation under these floor coverings and did not consider any damage incurred during installation or maintaining access to the cables once the floor system itself is installed through the use of fasteners, adhesives whether permanent or temporary, the resultant damage covered and hidden from view.the floor products themselves are often not installed per their installation guides, the cables underneath non-withstanding, by unqualified persons with little or no understanding of what they are dealing with or covering.many floor covering products are available, have they ALL been evaluated in this type of installation? This can be readily seenin all types of occupancies, with underfloor heat tapes and cable mats covered by ceramic tile or floor coverings, but they are protected by a GFCI as required in Art. 424. Carpet tiles are limited in size to 1 square meter to ensure ready access for future inspection for installations of FCC cables under floor carpet tiles. FCC cables have been exposed to all kinds of abuse not contemplated in their approvals. Additionally, building owners began to cover these cable installations with full carpeting and even padding when the carpet tiles were damaged, lost or just didn't meet the owners design scheme anymore. This same scenario is now possible for all floor coverings installed over CMUC cables. Further study and evaluation is warranted for this type of installation, with all of the supporting documentation provided to the panel for evaluation and consideration. NEC Panel 3 Final Ballot Results - Page 35 of 58-01/28/16

3 of 55 1/28/2016 2:20 PM Second Revision No. 621-NFPA 70-2015 [ Section No. 725.135(L) ] (L) Multifamily Dwellings. The following wires and cables shall be permitted to be installed in multifamily dwellings in locations other than the locations covered in 725.135(B) through (I): (1) Types CL2P, CL3P, CL2R, CL3R, CL2, CL3, and PLTC wires and cables (2) Type CL2X wires and cables less than 6 mm ( 1 4 in.) in diameter in nonconcealed spaces (3) Type CL3X wires and cables less than 6 mm ( 1 4 in.) in diameter in nonconcealed spaces (4) Types CL2P, CL3P, CL2R, CL3R, CL2, CL3, and PLTC wires and cables installed in the following: a. Plenum communications raceways b. Plenum cable routing assemblies c. Riser communications raceways d. Riser cable routing assemblies e. General-purpose communications raceways f. General-purpose cable routing assemblies (5) Types CL2P, CL3P, CL2R, CL3R, CL2, CL3, CL2X, CL3X, and PLTC wires and cables installed in raceways recognized in Chapter 3 (6) Type CMUC undercarpet communications wires and cables installed under carpet, floor covering, modular tiles, or planks. Carpet, floor covering, modular tiles, or planks shall be free-floating and shall use interlocking means to attach to each other or shall be adhered to the floor and shall be attached with release-type adhesives, but shall not be attached to the floor using grout, nails, or screws modular flooring, and planks Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: CMP 3 Organization: [ Not Specified ] Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Tue Nov 03 10:02:54 PST 2015 Committee Statement Committee Statement: Response Message: Type CMUC under carpet communication wire and cables are permitted to be installed under carpet with an installation expansion for modular flooring and planks. The installation instructions for free floating and interlocking does not necessarily apply to all kinds of modular flooring and planks and could be overly restrictive. Public Comment No. 224-NFPA 70-2015 [Section No. 725.135(L)] Ballot Results This item has passed ballot NEC Panel 3 Final Ballot Results - Page 36 of 58-01/28/16

4 of 55 1/28/2016 2:20 PM 15 Eligible Voters 0 Not Returned 12 Affirmative All 1 Affirmative with Comments 2 Negative with Comments 0 Abstention Affirmative All Bassett, Douglas P. Brunner, William A. Burlison, Steven D. Clary, Shane M. Keden, Ray R. Mills, T. David Owen, Steven J. Pace, David A. Scearce, Susan Newman Sleights, John E. Stene, Susan L. Straniero, George A. Affirmative with Comment Corbin, Adam D. I agree. Negative with Comment Brewer, Larry G. Information is in installation information Casparro, Paul J. See SR-620 NEC Panel 3 Final Ballot Results - Page 37 of 58-01/28/16

5 of 55 1/28/2016 2:20 PM Second Revision No. 622-NFPA 70-2015 [ Section No. 725.135(M) ] (M) One- and Two-Family Dwellings. The following wires and cables shall be permitted to be installed in one- and two-family dwellings in locations other than the locations covered in 725.135(B) through (I): (1) Types CL2P, CL3P, CL2R, CL3R, CL2, CL3, and PLTC wires and cables (2) Type CL2X wires and cables less than 6 mm ( 1 4 in.) in diameter (3) Type CL3X wires and cables less than 6 mm ( 1 4 in.) in diameter (4) Communications wires and Types CL2P, CL3P, CL2R, CL3R, CL2, CL3, and PLTC cables installed in the following: a. Plenum communications raceways b. Plenum cable routing assemblies c. Riser communications raceways d. Riser cable routing assemblies e. General-purpose communications raceways f. General-purpose cable routing assemblies (5) Types CL2P, CL3P, CL2R, CL3R, CL2, CL3, CL2X, CL3X, and PLTC wires and cables installed in raceways recognized in Chapter 3 (6) Type CMUC undercarpet communications wires and cables installed under carpet, floor covering, modular tiles, or planks. Carpet, floor covering, modular tiles, or planks shall be free-floating and shall use interlocking means to attach to each other or shall be adhered to the floor and shall be attached with release-type adhesives, but shall not be attached to the floor using grout, nails, or screws modular flooring, and planks Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: CMP 3 Organization: [ Not Specified ] Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Tue Nov 03 10:03:55 PST 2015 Committee Statement Committee Statement: Response Message: Type CMUC under carpet communication wire and cables are permitted to be installed under carpet with an installation expansion for modular flooring and planks. The installation instructions for free floating and interlocking does not necessarily apply to all kinds of modular flooring and planks and could be overly restrictive. Public Comment No. 225-NFPA 70-2015 [Section No. 725.135(M)] Ballot Results NEC Panel 3 Final Ballot Results - Page 38 of 58-01/28/16

6 of 55 1/28/2016 2:20 PM This item has passed ballot 15 Eligible Voters 0 Not Returned 12 Affirmative All 1 Affirmative with Comments 2 Negative with Comments 0 Abstention Affirmative All Bassett, Douglas P. Brunner, William A. Burlison, Steven D. Clary, Shane M. Keden, Ray R. Mills, T. David Owen, Steven J. Pace, David A. Scearce, Susan Newman Sleights, John E. Stene, Susan L. Straniero, George A. Affirmative with Comment Corbin, Adam D. I agree. Negative with Comment Brewer, Larry G. Information is in installation instructions Casparro, Paul J. See SR-620 NEC Panel 3 Final Ballot Results - Page 39 of 58-01/28/16

7 of 55 1/28/2016 2:20 PM Second Revision No. 611-NFPA 70-2015 [ New Section after 725.143 ] 725.144 Transmission of Power and Data. The requirements of 725.144(A) and (B) shall apply to Class 2 and Class 3 circuits that transmit power and data to a powered device. The requirements of Parts I and III of Article 725 and 300.11 shall apply to Class 2 and Class 3 circuits that transmit power and data. The conductors that carry power for the data circuits shall be copper. The current in the power circuit shall not exceed the current limitation of the connectors. Informational No. 1: One example of the use of cables that transmit power and data is the connection of closed-circuit TV cameras (CCTV). Informational Note No. 2: The 8P8C connector is in widespread use with powered communications systems. These connectors are typically rated at 1.3 amperes maximum. Table 725.144 Ampacities of Each Conductor in Amperes in 4-Pair Class 2 or Class 3 Data Cables Based on Copper Conductors at an Ambient Temperature of 30 C (86 F) with all All Conductors in All Cables Carrying Current, 60 C (140 F), 75 C (167 F), and 90 C (194 F) Rated Cables AWG Number of 4-Pair Cables in a Bundle 1 2 7 8 19 20 37 38 61 Temperature Rating Temperature Rating Temperature Rating Temperature Rating Temperature Rating 60 C 75 C 90 C 60 C 75 C 90 C 60 C 75 C 90 C 60 C 75 C 90 C 60 C 75 C 90 C 6 26 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.7 0.8 1 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.4 0.5 0.6 0 24 2 2 2 1 1.4 1.6 0.8 1 1.1 0.6 0.7 0.9 0.5 0.6 0.7 0 23 2.5 2.5 2.5 1.2 1.5 1.7 0.8 1.1 1.2 0.6 0.8 0.9 0.5 0.7 0.8 0 22 3 3 3 1.4 1.8 2.1 1 1.2 1.4 0.7 0.9 1.1 0.6 0.8 0.9 0 Note 1: For bundle sizes over 192 cables, or for conductor sizes smaller than 26 AWG, ampacities shall be permitted to be determined by qualified personnel under engineering supervision. Note 2: Where only half of the conductors in each cable are carrying current, the values in the table shall be permitted to be increased by a factor of 1.4. Informational Note: The conductor sizes in data cables in wide-spread use are typically 22 26 AWG. (A) Use of Class 2 or Class 3 Cables to Transmit Power and Data. Where Types CL3P, CL2P, CL3R, CL2R, CL3, or CL2 transmit power and data, the following shall apply, as applicable: (1) The ampacity ratings in Table 725.144 shall apply at an ambient temperature of 30 C (86 F). (2) For ambient temperatures above 30 C (86 F), the correction factors of 310.15(B)(2) shall apply. Informational Note: One example of the use of Class 2 cables is a network of closedcircuit TV cameras using 24 AWG, 60 C rated, Type CL2R, Category 5e local area network (LAN) cables. NEC Panel 3 Final Ballot Results - Page 40 of 58-01/28/16