Learning from Nature: Reducing Urban Stormwater Impacts

Similar documents
When planning stormwater management facilities, the following principles shall be applied where possible.

Post Construction BMPs

J. Paul Guyer, P.E., R.A.

Stormwater Prevention and Control

Appendices: Glossary. General Terms. Specific Terms. Low Impact Development Approaches Handbook

Chapter 14. Stormwater Quality Introduction

Green Infrastructure Recommendations For Parks and Public Spaces

CHAPTER 11 SITE DESIGN AND LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT

Homeowners Guide to Stormwater BMP Maintenance

Use of Best Management Practices

Green Infrastructure & Low Impact Development

5. LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS

Zoning Regulation Amendments Adopted December 19, 2018 effective date January 7, 2019

Draft Rhode Island Stormwater Design and Installation Standards Manual

Stormwater Management Techniques WMPF LAND USE TRAINING INSTITUTE MARCH 14, 2018

Going Green with the NYS Stormwater Design Standards

Lincoln 270. City of Lincoln. Stormwater Management Plan. April 2, 2013

DEALING WITH STORM WATER MANAGEMENT

2012 Saginaw Bay Watershed Conference

Climate Smart Communities Green Infrastructure Case Studies

Introduction to Low Impact Development. Fred Milch. East Central Florida Regional Planning Council

BE WATER WISE. Managing Your Onlot Stormwater. Sept. 23, 2006 Watershed Weekend

USF System Campus Master Plan Updates Goals, Objectives and Policies

Urban Conservation Practice Physical Effects ESTABLISHMENT, GROWTH, AND HARVEST NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT

STORMWATER GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE AND PLANNING/ZONING BOARDS

North Branch of Cypress Creek Ecological Restoration: A Comprehensive Approach to Stream Restoration

Beyond Rain Gardens Advancing the Use of Compost for Green Infrastructure, Low Impact Development, & Stormwater Management

Slow it, Spread it, Sink it using Green Stormwater Infrastructure

What is stormwater runoff? Why is it a problem? Available Financial Incentives for Stormwater BMP s Downspout Disconnection - up to $20

NDIA Environment, Energy, and Sustainability Symposium & Exhibition Denver, Colorado May 2009

INTRODUCTION TO GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE HOW WE CAN PROTECT OUR COMMUNITIES AND OUR WATERS Maywood Public Library Bergen County, New Jersey

Evaluating Low Impact Development Practices for Stormwater Management on an Industrial Site in Mississippi

Chapter 3 Site Planning and Low Impact Development

Lesson 2: Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs)

Stormwater Basin Retrofit Project P-6 St. Peters, MO 30% Design Meeting Willott Square / Pegasus Farms

Green Infrastructure Overview

APPENDIX A SIMPLIFIED APPROACH TO STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FOR SMALL PROJECTS. In West Sadsbury Township, Chester County, Pennsylvania

One County s Success in Linking Watershed Protection and Land Use Planning

Bioretention cell schematic key

Key elements : Filter Strips must be designed within parameters required by the Fort Wayne s Development Standards/Criteria Manual.

Old Mill Community Association Bioretention Facility

IMPLEMENTING STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR DEVELOPMENT

Grass Buffer T-1. Description. Site Selection. Designing for Maintenance

Urban Water Management and Soils (ESRM 311 & SEFS 507)

2001 Southeastern Pennsylvania Stormwater Management Symposium Villanova University. Jean K. Akers

Bioswales: A Guide to Low-Impact Development Design and Maintenance. Introduction and Compilation by: Leslie D. Bartsch And Jennifer S.

MANUAL OF DESIGN, INSTALLATION, AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLANS

Appendix D - Technical Design Criteria for BMPs

Pennsylvania Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual

Just The Basics: Illicit Discharge. What does it mean to me?

GUIDELINES FOR ECOLOGICAL PERFORMANCE

ST. MARY S SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICT (SMSCD) AND DPW&T CONCEPT EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES AND CHECKLIST

Principles for Ecological Landscape Design in Brownfield Business Parks

Toronto Complete Streets Guidelines

Working Group Meeting

Planning, Design, and Construction of Green Infrastructure.

Green Roofs and Stormwater Management Virginia Stovin

Rainfall Capture and Green Subdivision Design:

2.1 Principles & Objectives

LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY COMPREHENSIVE & STRATEGIC CAMPUS MASTER PLAN. APPENDIX G - Stormwater Study Findings & Stormwater Solutions

New Development Stormwater Guidelines

How to Update a Storm Water Management Program (SWMP) to Incorporate Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) BMPs

Urban Water Management (ESRM 311 & SEFS 507) Cougar Mtn Regional Wildland Park & Lakemont Blvd, Bellevue WA

ATTACHMENT 1 WILSON MINE LECROY AREA SEMIPERMANENT DEWATERING SYSTEM

Putting a LID on Stormwater Pollution. Michele Loudenback, RPES Stormwater Enforcement Water Quality Division

4.5 City of Indianapolis Stormwater Green Infrastructure Guidance: Bioretention (rain gardens) Bioretention Fact Sheet Bioretention Technical Design

Rainwater Management an issue for the 21 st Century. Hydrological Cycle

PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT LATHAM 200 MMSCFD GAS PROCESSING PLANT

DRAFT DESIGN CRITERIA STORMWATER TREATMENT STANDARDS CITY OF OVERLAND PARK

Green Infrastructure Stormwater Management Applications in the Pines Frequently Asked Questions and Example Projects

APPENDIX A. Proposed Guidance and LID checklists for UConn and Town of Mansfield

Importance of Master Planning Marcy Colclough

Lake and Stream Restoration Project

Stormwater Retrofitting: The Art of Opportunity. Presented by the Center for Watershed Protection

Green Infrastructure and Low-Impact Development Technologies

Town of Essex Small Site Erosion Control Guide

Urban Stormwater Retrofit Program Highlights

Community LID Workgroup Issue Paper #6

Appendix I. Checklists

Map Reading 201: Where Does the Water Go?? Map Reading Map Reading 201. Interconnected Systems

CHECKLIST FOR PHASE II DRAINAGE REPORT

WQ-23 MOUNTAINOUS AND STEEP SLOPE SITES

Sustainable Stormwater Management through Green Infrastructure. Jersey City Public School #5

HIGHLAND LAKES WATERSHED ORDINANCE WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL MANUAL

Adopting the Manual of Best Management Practices for Stormwater Quality. Facts for Communities

Article 20 Stormwater Management

Green Street BMP Matrix

NPDES - PCSM. Permit Preparation

East Montpelier SWMP Preliminary BMP Summary Sheet BMP ID #: 1 Site name: U-32 High School. Current site type

Stormwater Runoff and the District of Columbia RiverSmart Homes Defined:

2011 ASLA Design Awards. Coyote Gulch Honor Award and Land Stewardship Designation Valerian LLC. Environmental Restoration and Reclamation

Technical guidance to meet stormwater management design requirements; and,

Low Impact Development (LID) and Bioretention Techniques

Water Sensitive Urban Design Site Development Guidelines and Practice Notes. Appendix

Chapter 1: General Program Information

Worksheet #14 Water Runoff Management

Tale of Two Cities: Exploring How Two Communities are Using Green Infrastructure to Reduce Flood Risk

Stormwater Regulations & Considerations Morse Study Area. Pam Fortun, P.E. CFM Senior Stormwater Treatment Engineer Engineering Services Division

Impervious Cover Assessment and Reduction Action Plan for Woodstown, New Jersey

In the year 1800, 3 percent of the world s population lived in. Hydrograph

Transcription:

This article was published in the Spring, 2005 Issue of LakeLine magazine It is posted on the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District s web site with the authors and the publishers permission to the authors to do so. Learning from Nature: Reducing Urban Stormwater Impacts by Jim Wulliman, P.E., Muller Engineering Company, Inc., Lakewood, CO jwulliman@mullereng.com and Paul Thomas, LA, Wenk Associates, Denver, CO pthomas@wenkla.com

Learning from Nature: Reducing Urban Stormwater Impacts Jim Wulliman and Paul Thomas The transformation of undeveloped land into our urban fabric of buildings and pavement typically increases surface water runoff, which can accelerate the erosion of drainageways and increase pollution loading to receiving waters. These stresses have ripple effects in the environment and in municipal budgets, which often are unprepared to deal with the costs of mitigating impacts to streams, lakes, and infrastructure. Increased urban runoff and its associated impacts are caused by impervious surfaces that no longer infiltrate rainwater and by drainage facilities that capture runoff from these surfaces and accelerate it to the nearest drainageway. While many communities have adopted measures to reduce these negative effects, most programs don t come close to re-establishing the dynamics of a natural system that are necessary to have healthy streams and lakes (Figures 1 and 2). Several stormwater management approaches recently explored in the Denver, Colorado area are attempting to learn from nature and incorporate beneficial features, functions, and processes that have been observed in nature. Using natural processes as a design guide can yield stormwater facilities that are functional, costeffective, and attractive to people and wildlife. Rainfall and Runoff in Natural Areas Prior to any development, a natural area such as a prairie grassland has a capacity to absorb almost all rainfall events, producing surface runoff during Figures 1 and 2. Urban pavement and roofs typically reduce the infiltration of rainfall into the ground, increasing surface runoff and contributing to stream degradation, habitat disruption, and increased pollutant loading to lakes and other receiving waters. Spring 2005 25

the most intense storms that on the average, less than once every year or two. When runoff does occur, flow patterns in natural areas are often shallow, wide, and relatively slow. Vegetation can provide significant resistance at shallow flow depths, holding back the water and keeping it from combining quickly with other flow streams and adding up to high runoff rates. It is generally only the largest storms that cause erosion and produce significant pollutant loads. The capacity for infiltration, the resistance to flow, and the substantial flood storage found in nature are radically reduced in most urban environments. High rates and volumes of runoff also produce significant pollutant loadings, during almost all rainfall events, exceeding a tenth of an inch of rainfal. These small storms occure many times per year (Figure 3). Integrating Natural Processes in an Urban Environment Infiltration, resistance to flow, and flood storage can be integrated into urban projects to a greater degree than what has been typical of past practices. Natural processes can be emulated in the design of stormwater facilities to enhance their effectiveness and attractiveness. Three stormwater management approaches being implemented in the Denver, Colorado area each taking its design cue from processes observed in nature serve to re-create more natural rainfall-runoff relationships and reduce urban stream erosion and pollutant loading. These three approaches include: creating healthy stream channels, designing effective stormwater detention, and increasing infiltration of site runoff. Creating Healthy Stream Channels Healthy stream channels channels that are stable, well vegetated, and have natural floodplain overbanks are able to relieve energy during high water events by allowing runoff to spread into the overbanks. Under the right conditions, this may slow the water down, reduce erosional forces, and, to some degree, increase the storage and infiltration of runoff. Water quality in smaller ruinoff events may be enhanced through vegetative filtering, infiltration, wetland processes, and arresting the Figure 3. Emulation of natural processes -a design goal for this constructed wetlands detention basin in Greenwood Village, Colorado allows stormwater management facilities to be functional, cost-effective, and attractive to people and wildlife. erosion of bed and bank material that, in Colorado s Front Range, often contains significant amounts of adsorbed nutrients such as phosphorus. Nutrients are linked to high levels of algal productivity and eutrophication in Colorado lakes. However, increased urban runoff (i.e., peak flows and volumes) often degrades streams, creating deep, eroded channels that are inherently unstable and are subject to high flow velocities, eroision, and high sediment loads. Degraded urban channels typically require checks or drop structures to control the grade of the drainageway, rock riprap to stabilize banks, and revegetation to restore disturbed areas. The design of drainageway rehabilitation projects in the Denver area is evolving to the point where engineers are routinely working with landscape architects, plant ecologists, and wildlife biologists to incorporate the best characteristics of healthy, natural streams into urban drainageway improvement projects. One example of this approach is the Cottonwood Creek Project in southeast Denver. The project was recently constructed by the Cherry Creek Basin Water Quality Authority to help reduce the amount of sediment and phosphorus entering Cherry Creek Reservoir from a tributary with typical urban stream issues. The project involved filling in a deep, actively eroding channel to create a shallow, stable base flow channel meandering through riffles and pools. The rock riffles, constructed to replicate similar natural grade control formations observed in a nearby creek, provide grade control, energy dissipation, and aquatic habitat. The raised base flow channel is less than 2 below the surrounding overbanks, keeping the water table close to the ground surface to encourage the growth of riparian and upland vegetation, and allowing flood flows to spill into the wide overbank areas. This natural floodplain approach keeps velocities low and flood storage high, while enhancing water quality through infiltration, wetland processes, and control of channel erosion (Figures 4, 5, and 6). 26 Spring 2005

Designing Effective Stormwater Detention The basic urban management technique for providing flood storage and attenuation is stormwater detention, which replaces some of the losses in natural storage that results from urbanization. Stormwater detention consists of constructing impoundments that capture runoff during a storm and release it Figure 4. The Cottonwood Creek Project created a meandering base flow channel with rock riffles and pools and at reduced rates. adjacent wide overbank areas where high flows can spread out to dissipate energy. The project, emulating a natural floodplain stream, was constructed by the Cherry Creek Basin Water Quality Authority to help protect Cherry Creek However, when Reservoir. runoff is released from a number of individual detention basins over extended periods of time, the flows add to each other as they travel downstream, resulting in increased peak flows along the receiving waters. This diminishes the effectiveness of detention basins as a watershed management strategy. Also, most detention basins do not provide much flow reduction in the small, frequent storms that exacerbate stream erosion and diminish water quality in urban environments. A new detention concept is being explored in the Denver area that holds the potential for more effective peak flow reduction. The concept, called fullspectrum detention, has been shown Figure 5. Prior to the project, Cottonwood Creek was deeply incised and actively eroding, through computer simulations to closely conveying phosphorus-laden sediment to Cherry Creek Reservoir. match pre-development runoff peaks both for large floods and smaller, very slowly, while passing the balance year release rates also effectively frequent rainfall events, even for large of the runoff (approximating the precontrols a full range of more frequent watershed areas combining many developed runoff volume) through a storms. The total 100-year detention individual detention facilities. The control outlet that reduces the peak flow volume required is slightly greater than concept is described in detail in a paper to pre-development rates. The volume of current practice, but with what appears posted for comment at the Web site of excess urban runoff is surprisingly to be far more effective results. the Urban Drainage and Flood Control constant for a wide range of storms, Although full-spectrum detention District (UDFCD) at http://udfed.org/ based on Denver rainfall-runoff will not totally eliminate the technpapers.htm. analyses. Once this excess volume is destabilizing effects of urbanization, it is The concept works by trapping the swallowed up, controlling the residual expected that stream degradation will be additional volume of runoff that is runoff becomes easier; a single outlet reduced as runoff volume and peak rate generated by the urban impervious area are kept closer to pre-development sized to match pre-development 100( excess urban runoff ) and releasing it Spring 2005 27

Figure 6. The project s grade-control structures were designed to emulate natural stream riffles using a mix of rock observed in a nearby creek. Figure 8. Green roofs, like this garden area over a parking garage in Denver, Colorado, allows rainfall to infiltrate, reducing surface runoff and pollutant loading. greater pollutant removal may be possible, although groundwater protection and water rights issues need to be addressed in this case (Figure 7). conditions. For these benefits to be realized, however, full-spectrum detention must be uniformly applied (i.e., no exceptions for public streets and other urbanization) and an ongoing maintenance program is necessary to assure the long-term performance of the basins. Full-spectrum detention will help protect stormwater quality in other ways, too. A portion of sediment and other settle-able pollutants will drop out in the detention basin as the excess urban runoff volume is slowly released. If all or a portion of the excess urban runoff volume is encouraged to infiltrate into the ground following a storm, even runoff. This process, advanced in Prince George s County, Maryland, under the heading Low Impact Development (LID), has been encouraged for many years by th UDFCD as minimizing Increasing Infiltration of Site Runoff The key to increasing the amount of rainfall that infiltrates into the ground on a development site is relatively simple disrupting the direct flow of runoff from paved areas to storm drains and, instead, providing opportunities for runoff to travel over vegetated soil. Reducing or disconnecting impervious surfaces, using porous pavement, and conveying runoff over vegetated ground surfaces serves to filter, infiltrate, and attenuate p 7000 Predevelopment conditions (2% impervious), no detention 100-YR Peak Discharge (cfs) 2-YR Developed conditions (48% impervious), no detention 5000 10-YR 6000 Developed conditions (48% impervious), with 10/100-year detention 4000 Developed conditions (48% impervious), with full-spectrum detention 3000 2000 1000 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 2-Hour Rainfall Depth (in) Figure 7. The full-spectrum detention concept provides closer matching of natural, pre-development flow rates than conventional detention designs, especially for frequent, smaller storm events. It is expected that this detention concept could help reduce stream degradation and pollutant loading in urbanizing watersheds. 28 Spring 2005 Figure 9. Runoff drains through a spout from the roof of this office building in Denver to a splash block and rain garden below, creating an interesting landscape element while promoting infiltration.

Figures 10 and 11. Grass swales in residential and commercial areas are viable substitutes for inlets and storm sewers, slowing flows and enhancing infiltration and treatment of runoff. figures 8 through 15). A number of specific techniques for reducing runoff are promoted in UDFCD s Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual, including: allowing runoff to drain across grass buffers and through grass swales instead of conveying flows directly from roofs or pavement into a storm sewer; reducing pavement and using porous pavement; and incorporating porous Figures 12 and 13. Paving stones with an underlying rock base provide landscape an attractive and functional porous pavement to infiltrate runoff at this detention ( biodenver office building site. retention in LID terminology) in selected areas of the directly connected impervious area site. (MDCIA). These practices reduce urban runoff to levels closer to natural, prethese practices that promote development hydrologic conditions (see infiltration can be adapted to fit into the character of the development area in which they are being employed. While emulating natural processes to improve water quality, they do not have to appear wild and can in fact be very urban, modern landscape elements. Creative designers are incorporating water quality treatment devices into site landscaping, plazas, and even roof gardens. Whatever form these facilities take, they function at their best when they add value to the site and are maintainable for the long term. The City and County of Denver has recently produced a guidance manual to further illustrate how these techniques can be integrated into site plans (see design principles in related article on page 31). The manual is directed not just to design engineers, but to land owners and site planners, to encourage integration of these best management practices (BMPs) right from the start. Stormwater Management Based on Natural Processes By designing stormwater management facilities that approximate the infiltration, resistance to flow, and flood storage that can be found in nature, urban projects can come closer to replicating the rainfall-runoff conditions found in nature. Stormwater runoff, stream erosion, and pollutant loading can be reduced during the most frequent rainfall events, helping to protect the water quality of our streams and lakes. Spring 2005 29

Figures 14 and 15. Parking lot medians and islands provide opportunities to capture runoff from paved surfaces and allow it to infiltrate through planted sandy soil material, a BMP termed bio-retention or porous landscaping detention. Jim Wulliman, P.E. is with Muller Engineering Company in Lakewood, Colorado. He has enjoyed working in the field of stormwater management in the Denver area for 26 years. He can be reached at jwulliman@mullereng.com. Paul Thomas is a landscape architect and senior project manager with Wenk Associates in Denver, Colorado a firm known for its work bridging the fields of landscape architecture and engineering, especially within the realm of water resources. He can be reached at pthomas@wenkla.com. 30 Spring 2005

Design Principles for Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) The following design principles, summarized from the City and County of Denver s Water Quality Management Plan, provide a foundation for developing stormwater BMPs for a site, especially BMPs that enhance infiltration and reduce runoff. Principle 1: Consider stormwater needs early in the development process. Left to the end of the site development process, stormwater facilities will often be shoe-horned into the site, resulting in forced, constrained approaches. Stormwater quality and flood control requirements are just as fundamental to good site design as other elements such as building layout, grading, parking, and streets. Dealing with stormwater quality after major site plan decisions have been made is too late. Principle 2: Take advantage of the entire site when planning for stormwater management facilities. Often, stormwater quality and flood detention is dealt with only at the low corner of the site, and ignored on the remainder of the project. Spreading runoff over a larger portion of the site reduces the need for big corner-of-site basins that are often walled, unattractive, and difficult to maintain. Principle 3: Consider runoff reduction techniques a prerequisite for other site BMPs. The benefits of implementing runoff reduction are often overlooked. The techniques can lessen degradation in downstream channels, reduce pollutant loads, allow smaller detention facilities that require less area, and can help create an attractive site. Principle 4: Integrate stormwater quality management and flood control. Both stormwater quality, dealing primarily with small, frequent storms, and flood control, addressing large infrequent events, need to be integrated in a site s stormwater management system. Detention basins can be combined to handle both types of storms, or separate systems can be designed for water quality and flood control. Principle 5: Design facilities that can be effectively maintained. A key to public acceptance of stormwater management facilities is to create features that will endure and that are designed with maintenance in mind. Equipment access for sediment removal is especially important. Principle 6: Develop stormwater quality facilities that are attractive. Stormwater quality areas can add interest and diversity to a site. Public spaces like gardens, plazas, rooftops, and even parking lots can become amenities and provide visual interest while performing stormwater quality functions. The goal is to create attractive facilities that enhance a community and to avoid designing BMPs that become nuisances or eyesores that detract from a site. Principle 7: Address geotechnical and foundation design issues. The emphasis on infiltration of rainwater heightens the need for good foundation design that addresses a range of potential soil-moisture issues. In Colorado, expansive soil is an especially critical issue that needs to be mitigated through facility placement, linings, under-drainage, and the like. Consideration of groundwater quality is also important; designers need to consider water quality effects associated with unwanted leaching of constituents from soils. Principle 8: Design and maintain facilities with public safety in mind. One of the highest priorities of engineers and public officials is to protect public health, safety and welfare. The design of stormwater quality facilities needs to consider public access issues and mosquito/west Nile virus concerns. Spring 2005 31