Social Monitoring Report

Similar documents
IND: MFF - North Karnataka Urban Sector Investment Program - Tranche 2

6 PORT SYDNEY SETTLEMENT AREA

Chapter 7 Route window W20 Dover Road and Leigh Road bridges. Transport for London

Social Screening and Impact Assessment for Sub Projects

SUSTAINABLE URBAN DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENT PROGRAM FOUR YEARS OF PROGRESS

WELCOME TO THE PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE. Please Sign In

GUIDELINES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SCREENING OF ROAD PROJECTS

Right-of-Way Acquisitions and Relocations Technical Memorandum

GREEN SHEET ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS FOR THE IOWA HIGHWAY 100 EXTENSION

Municipal Class EA Study Public Information Centre No. 1 December 13, :00 pm 7:00 pm. Please sign in so we can keep you updated on this study

SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL. Planning and New Communities Director

Chapter 1 - General Design Guidelines CHAPTER 1 GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINES

Middlebury RS 0174(8)

Victoria Bridge Municipal Class EA Civic Works Committee

Chapter 10 Route window W17 Middlegreen Road, St Mary s Road and Trenches bridges. Transport for London

TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE

The West Vaughan Employment Area Secondary Plan Policies

DESIGN CRITERIA PACKAGE

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

WELCOME TO PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE #2. Please Sign In

Emery Village Road 2A Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Study

GLEN ROAD PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STUDY PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE #2 OCTOBER 24, 2017

WATERFORD Plan of Preservation, Conservation and Development Supplement Part 1 - Policy Element

North Oakville East Parks Facilities Distribution Plan. November, 2009

Equity and Environmental Justice B. MINORITY, ELDERLY, AND LOW INCOME POPULATIONS IN THE STUDY AREA

EXHIBIT A. Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 1 (Town Center) First Amended Project Plan 1

Bucks Bar Road Bridge Project Public Informational Meeting Wednesday, January 6, 2010

TOWN OF WHITBY REPORT RECOMMENDATION REPORT

CHAPTER 7: VISION AND ACTION STATEMENTS. Noble 2025 Vision Statement

Commissioners Road West Realignment Environmental Assessment

WELCOME TO OPEN HOUSE TWO November 28, 2018

City of Heath. Town Center Concept

The Corporation of the TOWN OF MILTON

Meeting Purpose: Date and Time: Location: Attendance: Handouts:

BREEDON NORTHERN LIMITED

COMMUNICATION URBAN DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CITY OF DES MOINES, IOWA MAY 16, 2017 MEETING

Rezoning Transportation Analysis Petition Number: General Location Identifier:

PLANNING JUSTIFICATION REPORT

East Corridor Final Environmental Impact Statement

Landscape Act. (Act No. 110 of June 18, 2004)

Alternatives Development Three conceptual alternatives were developed for the Race Road/Jessup Village Planning Study and are described below:

Northern Branch Corridor DEIS December 2011

JOINT DECLARATION BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE REPUBLIC OF INDIA ON A PARTNERSHIP FOR SMART & SUSTAINABLE URBANISATION. New Delhi, 6 Oct 2017

Bridge Type Assessment and Evaluation

PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS

Slope Stability Management Framework

CPA , Bristoe Station and Kettle Run Preservation Study Comprehensive Plan Amendment

City of Meriden Harbor Brook Flood Control Project Overview

Northern Branch Corridor SDEIS March 2017

CHAPTER 12 IMPLEMENTATION

3. Additional driveways may be permitted where determined by the Planning Commission to adequately accommodate traffic or ensure public safety.

Welcome. Mill Creek Ravine Pedestrian Bridges Rehabilitation. Public Information Session #1. Thursday, October 27, :00 8:00 p.m.

A Growing Community Rural Settlement Areas

COLVER ROAD INDUSTRIAL CONCEPT PLAN

ARTICLE 13 STREETS General

DRAFT Amsterdam/Churchill Community Plan (4/17/08) Adopted By the Gallatin County Commission

Asbury Chapel Subdivision Sketch Plan

ARTICLE 13 STREETS General

ESTABLISH AN EFFICIENT TOWN CENTER

Rights-of-Way Preservation Guidelines

28. Coolaney-Rockfield Mini-Plan

(APN: );

Parks, Trails, and Open space Element

Chapter 9 Route window W18 Slough station. Transport for London

Southern Gateway Project and Public Green

S o u t h C e n t r a l O u t l i n e P l a n. Leduc Business Park. North Leduc Industrial Area Structure Plan C it y of Led u c.

2993-ARM: North-South Road Corridor Investment Program - Tranche November 2015, 15:00 (Yerevan time)

Subject: Hendry County Evaluation and Appraisal Report Letter of Understanding - Identification of Major Issues

Northeast Anthony Henday Drive Manning Freeway to Whitemud Drive Welcome to this Construction Information Session

ENBRIDGE GAS DISTRIBUTION INC. Proposed Relocation for Ninth Line, Markham and Whitchurch-Stouffville. Environmental Screening Report

Mississippi Skyway Preliminary Engineering Report

PROJECT BACKGROUND. Preliminary Design Scope and Tasks

The Illinois Department of Transportation and Lake County Division of Transportation. Route 173, including the Millburn Bypass

12 AMENDMENT NO. 149, TOWN OF MARKHAM HIGHWAY 404 NORTH SECONDARY PLAN

PLANNING RATIONALE FOR 1127, 1128 MILL STREET AND 1125 CLAPP LANE CITY OF OTTAWA

CITY OF COLWICH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE LAND USE 1

Clay Street Bridge Replacement Project

6. REGIONAL AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES DESIGNATIONS 6.1. OBJECTIVES FOR REGIONAL AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES LAND USE DESIGNATIONS

6 RURAL RESIDENTIAL. 6.1 Rural Use. Rural Use (RU) Goals and Objectives. Policy Goal

Request Modification of Conditions (Automobile Service Station) Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Jimmy McNamara

REPORT TO: Council FOR: Regular Meeting. PRESENTED: April 1, 2008 FILE: , Byl 1932 & 1936

Pennsy Greenway Trail

Memorandum CITY OF DALLAS

WELCOME! 8 8:30 6: TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS. Open House. Presentation & Q&A

Scope of Services. River Oaks Boulevard (SH 183) Corridor Master Plan

The Dreispitz in Basel / Switzerland: New economy on old sites

City of Hermosa Beach Administrative Policy #

8.0 Design and Form of Development 43/

Development of land adjacent to Braggs Farm Lane and Rumbush Lane, Dickens Heath. Welcome. Today s exhibition. The proposal site

Wednesbury to Brierley Hill Extension

Existing Conditions Summary (Draft for Review)

December 1, 2014 (revised) Preliminary Report -- Thomas Jefferson Site Evaluation

Chapter 27 Route Window SE7 Church Manorway Bridge. Transport for London

3 Urban Design and the State Highway Network

13 THORNHILL YONGE STREET STUDY IMPLEMENTATION CITY OF VAUGHAN OPA 669 AND TOWN OF MARKHAM OPA 154

Glenborough at Easton Land Use Master Plan

141 GEORGE STREET PLANNING RATIONALE

NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY

Victoria Street Pedestrian Bridge

Second Line West Pedestrian/Cyclist Crossing of Highway 401 Class EA. Second Line West Pedestrian/Cyclist Crossing of Highway 401 Class EA

Transcription:

Social Monitoring Report Due Diligence Report Four Bridges Improvement Project Ganja Region, Roads: R24 and Y-05-08 Involuntary September 2013 Azerbaijan: Road Network Development Program Tranche 4 Prepared by AzerRoadService for the Ministry of Transport, Republic of Azerbaijan and the Asian Development Bank.

This social monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

AZERBAIJAN REPUBLIC MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT AZERROADSERVICE OJSC FOUR BRIDGES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT GANJA REGION, ROADS: R 24 and Y-05-08 SAFEGURAD REQUIREMENT INVOLUNTARY RESETTLEMENT AND LAND ACQUISITION IMPACTS Due Diligence Report September 2013 Kocks Consult GmbH Stegemannstrasse Koblenz, Germany

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND OF THE PROJECT... 3 2. INVOLUNTARY RESETTLEMENT AND SCOPE OF LAND ACQUISITION... 4 3. SUMMARY OF IMPACTS... 6 4. ANNEXES... 7 Kocks Consult GmbH 2

1. Background of the Project The Government of Azerbaijan ( Government ) is seeking funding under Tranche-4 of the Multitranche Financing Facility (MFF) to meet the cost for rehabilitation/reconstruction of four bridges and rehabilitation of local roads in the Gazhak region, and for the project management. The PFR for the Project involves rehabilitation and reconstruction design and tender document preparation, including Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, construction supervision of 3 bridges along the (Gazakh) - Akstafa Poylu Sadiqli Georgian Border (R 24) and one bridge on the Gazakh Poylu Road (Y-05-08), Under the ADB loan also consulting services for the preparation of detailed design and construction supervision of some local roads (about 40.0 km) in the Project area and the engineering services for design and tender document preparation, including Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, for the bridge rehabilitation/reconstruction under a Design and Built Contract should be financed. The 4 Bridges Improvement Project comprises the reconstruction of the 4 existing bridges: Bridge 01 02 03 04 Road R-24 R-24 Y-05-08 R-24 Akstafa-Poylu- Poylu-Sadiqli- Poylu-Duzqislaq- Poylu-Sadiqli Sadiqli Gurcustan Qazax km 2.0 17.0 29.5 0.1 Existing span arrangement (m) 2 x 14, 1 x 22 8 x 21.5 3 x 18 4 x 18 Existing carriageway arrangement (m) 1.4+7.0+1.4 0.2+4.6+0.2 1.2+8.0+1.2 1.4+8.0+1.4 Obstacle crossed Railway Kur River Aji Dara River Aghsafa River Location: Decimal 41.1275, 41.2420, 41.3021, Degrees (WGS84) 45.4417 45.4396 45.3509 41.2262, 45.4397 The Project includes the rehabilitation and improvement of the approaches and the rehabilitation of some 40 km of local roads without any changes in the alignment. As a first step a Feasibility Study including cost estimates, land compensation and land acquisition planning, environmental impact assessment and studies on traffic management during construction has been prepared which should be followed by a conceptual design and the preparation of the tender documents for one or two design and built contracts. All road sections on which the bridges are located will be designed for Category III and thus bridges have to be designed as Category II, as per the following details: o carriageway width: 7.50 m (2 x 3.75 m); o width of shoulder: 3.00 m (2 x 1.50 m); o single side pedestrian walkway, 1.50 m wide plus safety strip carriageway side, 0.44 m wide and railing, 0.20 m wide; o single side safety strip, 1.00 m wide; The Contractor is expected to prepare an acceptable detailed design according to technical and environmental standards. The technical standards include Azeri standards, GHOST, SNIP, and AASHTO. The consultant will ensure that the design and built contract include all necessary measures to minimize and mitigate environmental and social impacts, and improve road safety. Kocks Consult GmbH 3

The consultant will assist the PIU in obtaining all obligatory technical and environmental approvals required prior to construction. The four (4) bridges are all located in Gazakh Region, three (3) of them along the the (Gazakh) - Akstafa Poylu Sadiqli Georgian Border (R 24) and one bridge on the Gazakh Poylu Road (Y-05-08). Figure 1 below indicates the locations. Figure 1: Location Map of the 4 Bridges 2. Involuntary Resettlement and Scope of Land Acquisition During the Preliminary Design Phase for the Four Bridges Improvement Project, a comprehensive poverty and social assessment and determination of potential land acquisition and resettlement impacts were undertaken. Technical designers were guided by the principle of impact avoidance and/or minimization. The result of the social assessment of resettlement impacts showed that the Project will not require land acquisition or removal of vulnerable and any other groups from the road reserve area. Likewise, no land outside of the road reserve area (30 meters from both sides of the existing Kocks Consult GmbH 4

centerline) will be taken. Project impacts are small and mainly focused on temporary access requirement during closure of road/bridge segments under construction. As a result of this closure alternative access will have to be provided to the affected community but all temporary access can be granted on state owned land and existing local and agricultural roads. Businesses like stores, shops and restaurant will not be disrupted. No internally displaced people or families whose household income falls below the poverty line are affected. As part of the temporary impacts anticipated, the civil works contracts required the contractor to be responsible for the temporary acquisition and reinstatement of all land required outside the road reserve for construction camps, offices, borrow pits, materials storage sites, materials processing sites, haul roads and traffic detour roads. The contractors are responsible for the selection of the land parcels they require and they are responsible for negotiating agreements with land owners to occupy the land. In the event that a contractor fails to obtain the agreement of any landowner, they would be required to select an alternative site and negotiate a new agreement. No involuntary occupation of land for temporary construction purposes would occur. Provision will be made in the civil works contracts for the contractors to be responsible for providing adequate measures to cater for existing traffic while the road/bridge rehabilitation works are in progress. These measures include (i) enabling single lane traffic operations on one side of the road, while construction works are carried out on the other side; (ii) constructing and maintaining temporary diversion roads within the road reserve; and (iii) diverting traffic onto any parallel existing roads and maintaining these roads. 3. Summary of Impacts The Environmental and Social Safeguards assessments are being undertaken as outlined in the Terms of Reference for the project, and in particular conforming to ADB s Safeguards Policy Statement (SPS). As mentioned in the SPS, ADB commits to funding projects that ensures social and environmental sustainability by protecting the environment and people from projects potential adverse impacts. Thus, explicitly, the objectives of ADB s safeguards are to: (i) avoid adverse impacts of projects on the environment and affected people, where possible; (ii) minimize, mitigate, and/or compensate for adverse project impacts on the environment and affected people when avoidance is not possible; and (iii) help borrowers/clients to strengthen their safeguard systems and develop the capacity to manage environmental and social risks. In the conduct of the environmental and social assessments, the project team has been aware about the above mentioned policy and hopes to maintain and uphold them by carefully evaluating project options for the bridge locations and alignments. Hence, for the design options, it became necessary to as much as possible; to situate the future reconstructed bridge along the same alignment or within close proximity to the existing bridges with the approach roads to be within the existing right-of-way in order to practically eliminate land acquisition from any private individual. The foregoing discussions present the status of the resettlement and land acquisition impacts of the Project. A. Bridge No. 1 This bridge site is located at the northern edge of the town of Akstafa surrounded by farmlands and primarily rural in character. The distance from the bridge to the nearest houses is around 120-130 meters which can be a concern during the construction period. Farm and domesticated Kocks Consult GmbH 5

animals may roam around the site during the construction stage of the project can pose some safety issues. Two railroads cross the underneath of Bridge No. 1 and their operations pose a certain conflict with the bridge reconstruction works. It is also important to maintain transport connectivity, hence a detour road should be established which should consider minimal impact to current transport routes while maintaining safety to motorists and local inhabitants. As of the moment, a detour road parallel to the bridge, west of the bridge and to connect village local roads is being conceptualized. Maintenance of the detour road shall be responsibility of the winning contractor as well as reinstatement of such road at the end of the project. Since the bridge will be along the same alignment, no land impact for the bridge reconstruction itself is expected. To enable linkage for existing vehicular traffic, the existing local roads west of the bridge site will be connected over the railways by gravel road and culvert arrangements. The connecting detour road will traverse state-owned property only and with no existing privately owned structures will be affected. The existing double railways are found in this property. To enable minimal interruptions of the railway operations, the diverted traffic should be controlled by watchmen who would momentarily stop vehicular movement when trains will be near the crossing. Such traffic control will be done at all times so as to maintain traffic safety and avoid any untoward accidents. B. Bridge No. 2 This bridge crosses the Kur River which is quite wide at its current location with somewhat deep bed and steep banks. The river seems to be deep where it flows since the bed is not clearly visible and the flow can become turbulent during the rainy season. Even in the dry season, the flow was observed to be considerable. The existing steel bridge is one-lane and serves as the major connection of traffic. With this bridge, vehicular traffic can cross the Kur River to get to the border towns of Sadiqli in the Azerbaijan side and Ruisbolo in the Georgian side. The major settlement area is found on the south bank of Kur River with the nearest structure located at around 100m from the existing bridge abutment. At the north end of the bridge, a customs check-point office and police stations are located for the purpose of checking cargoes coming from and going to Georgia. An existing and operational railway runs parallel with a distance of 50 meter east of the existing steel Bridge No. 2. Around 20 meters from the current railway bridge, a new railway bridge has been constructed for future rail traffic. Although this new railway bridge is already completed, as of the moment, it is not yet in operation. One crucial issue being faced right now for the Bridge No. 2 is how to maintain transport connectivity during the construction period. The existing steel bridge is the only Kur River crossing for vehicular traffic in the area and it seems that allowing the bridge to exist to serve its purpose appears to be the only viable option. The location of the new bridge will be upstream and to the west of the existing bridge. The new bridge will be constructed parallel to the existing bridge. The land parcels at the bridge abutments and approaches are state-owned and no land acquisition from private owners will occur. The construction of a new bridge the approach at north side will affect the current customs check point and electric poles and lines. Since these are owned by authorities of the government, proper coordination with relevant agencies needs to be done. These structures are made of light materials and they can be easily dismantled and transferred to the either side of the proposed new north bridge approach road. Kocks Consult GmbH 6

C. Bridge No. 3 Bridge No. 3 is the farthest from Akstafa of the four identified bridges for the project. No settlement is found near this Bridge No. 3. The only structure that exists is a gas-pump facility located around 150m northwest of the existing bridge. For the construction option, a detour road at north and downstream side is being considered. This will primarily be gravel road which will run over pipe culverts and will serve as temporary crossing over the ravine. The bridge will be constructed at the same location. Temporary diversion road will be arranged north and downstream of the existing bridge. The area consists of vacant lands and owned by the state and with no land purchase from private owners necessary. To enable temporary use of land for detour road, ARS will have to coordinate the temporary detour road with relevant state agencies. D. Bridge No. 4 The fourth bridge is located in Poylu Village over Akstafa River along the Poylu-Duzqislaq- Qazax Road which branches south-westerly from the Akstafa-Poylu-Sadiqli Road. This bridge is at the verge of collapse with one of the piers shearing off from the foundation. As observed, river scouring would have produced such situation and the river is somewhat wider at this bridge point. The bridge is closed for any vehicular access for safety reasons. To enable connectivity, a pipe culvert crossing has been installed some 230m downstream over which the current road is connected to enable traffic to cross. This existing road runs alongside an existing railway located north of this pipe culvert crossing. This fourth bridge is near the houses and reconstructing the bridge at this existing location will entail some concerns to the nearby inhabitants. Since alternate crossings are in operation, traffic will not be impacted by the reconstruction of the bridge. The new bridge will be reconstructed in the same spot, maintaining the same location and orientation. No land acquisition is necessary since the road and bridge right of way still exist and no structures were illegally built. Since Bridge No. 4 is near the village residences, the usual construction nuisances will be expected and should be mitigated effectively by the Contractor in accordance with the IEE/EMP. E. Summary Tables Table 1: Scope of Impact on the Bridge Reconstruction Project Location Land Required Category of Land Affected (Hectares) Assets Located in Affected Land Component Location Area(ha) No of Private Municipal State Structure Trees Utilities Bridge Bridge No. 1 (over railways) Bridge No. 2 (over Kur River) Bridge No. 3 (over minor river) Bridge No. 4 (over Akstafa River) R-24 Akstafa- Poylu-Sadiqli Road, km 2 R-24 Poylu- Sadiqli Road, km 17 R-24 Poylu- Sadiqli- Gurcustan Road, km 29.5 Y-05-08 Poylu- Duzqislaq- Qazax Road, km 0.1 Parcels &crops None 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 None None None 0.7 4 0.0 0.0 0.7 1 22 2 None 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 None None None None 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 None None None Kocks Consult GmbH 7

The parcels of land that will be affected by the Bridge Project proposed are those along the proposed approaches for Bridge No. 2. These are state-owned with an approximate area of 0.3 hectares. Around six (6) minor trees will be affected and one temporary structure, belonging to police may have to be dismantled and relocated nearby. Several electric poles a gas pipeline may have to be relocated. Below is Table 2 which shows the summary of measures to address the impact of the proposed realignments. Table 2: Measures to Address the Impacts. Type of loss Scope of impact Category of PAP Entitlement Remarks Total (ha) No. of affected parcels Permanent loss of land 0.7 ha 4 State-Land (Gov t Internal govt. ARS, & SLCC, of Azerbaijan arrangement will agree Temporary impact - - Public Mitigating measures to be instituted by Civil Works Contractor Various types of impacts during construction Acquisition of the said state- owned lands will be arranged between the various government bodies. The ARS OJSC will inform the State Land and Cartography Office (SLCC) regarding the affected state-owned land. Temporary impacts will be the responsibility of the Contractor as stipulated in the Civil Work Contract. Kocks Consult GmbH 8

ANNEXES N Bridge No. 1 to be replaced K 24 Diversion road during construction Existing road to be improved Existing Railway Temporary Railway crossing Ak sta fa Sa di qli Fig. 1 Bridge No. 1 location map (source: google earth) N Bridge No. 2 (one lane only) R 24 Railway Bridge Location Option 2 Bridge Location Option 1 Agstafa Sadiqli Fig. 2 Bridge No. 2 location map (source: google earth) Kocks Consult GmbH 9

N Bridge No. 3 to be replaced R 24 Diversion road during construction Pipeline Temporary culvert Ag sta fa Sadiqli Fig. 3 Bridge No. 3 location map (source: google earth) N Bridge No. 4 to be replaced (closed) R 24 Existing diversion road Existing Railway Y-05-08 Qazax Sadiqli Agstafa Fig. 4 Bridge No. 4 location map (source: google earth) Kocks Consult GmbH 10