PHOSPHORUS AVAILABILITY IN RELATION TO SOIL ph IN CANE BELT AREAS OF FIJI. Nazeea Bano, Milika Vaniqi, Merlyn Goundar

Similar documents
Crop Management Practices. By Simon Bedasie

Inherent Factors Affecting Soil ph. Soil ph Management

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT. PHOSPHORUS (P) is an essential element

Phosphorus Facts Soil, plant, and fertilizer

Inherent Factors Affecting Soil ph. Soil ph Management

Nutrient Management And Nutrient Cycling Raymond C. Ward, President Ward Laboratories, Inc Kearney, NE

Unit D: ph of Soil. Lesson : Identifying the ph Changes in Soil

Soils and Fertilizers. Leo Espinoza Soils Specialist

THE FOREST NURSERY AND ITS SOILS

Availability of Calcium, Magnesium and Sulphur and Their Uptake by Amaranthus as Influenced by Composts and Fertilizers

Soil. Acidic soils... 1/19/2014

Concepts in Soil Fertility Jonathan Deenik Assistant Specialist, Soil Fertility Department of Tropical Plant and Soil Sciences

Understanding Your Virginia Soil Test Report

For nmental. Written By: Agustin o, Professor. Developed in. and justice for all. Department of. funded by activities. )

Managing Phosphorus to Optimize Potato Tuber Yield in the San Luis Valley

PASTURE AND HAY FIELDS: SOIL FUNDAMENTALS. Sanders County April 8, Clain Jones

Effect of Fertilizers on Soil Strength

USE OF SOME SELECTED WASTES AS SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURAL INPUTS

GEOL 408/508 INTRODUCTORY SOILS

PRELIMINARY STUDIES ON THE FERTILITY STATUS OF THE SOILS OF SRIGANGANAGAR DISTRICT, RAJASTHAN

Fertilizers and nutrient management for hops. Diane Brown, Michigan State University Extension

Table 4. Nutrient uptake and removal by sunflower in Manitoba studies. Nutrient Uptake Removal Uptake Removal

Demonstrate that inoculation can increase the yield of legumes.

Fertility and Crop Nutrition Jonathan Deenik Assistant Specialist, Soil Fertility Department of Tropical Plant and Soil Sciences

Soil Science Curriculum

THE INVESTIGATION BEGINS!

PROUDLY MADE IN AUSTRALIA

Soil test recommendations

Soil: We Can t Grow without it!

A PowerPoint has been provided

Proceedings of the 2 nd Annual Nitrogen: Minnesota s Grand Challenge & Compelling Opportunity Conference

Nutrient Management of Irrigated Alfalfa and Timothy

Problem. Can paper mill sludge be used as a fertilizer for plants and does it change the ph of the

CLAY, SANDY AND PEAT SOILS, AND SOIL ORGANIC MATTER

SOIL SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS

SOIL TESTS. Circular of Information 587 Revised September 1963 Agricultural Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Corvallis

Soils. Nutrients needed by plants 10/21/2013. Consists of a series of layers called. Soils consists of: Topsoil (A horizon) upper most layer

Soils and plant nutrients

A&L Canada Laboratories Inc.

Effect on Soil Quality and Plants on Utilization of Domestic and paper mill sludge in Farm Lands

Learning Objectives. C. Owen Plank

Management of Sodic Soils in Alberta

Definitions in Handbook

Making Sense of Soil Tests

Evaluating rootzone stresses and the role of the root system on rose crop productivity and fertilizer-water use efficiency:

Monitoring Nutrition for Crops

Keeping greenhouse soils fertile: nutrients, compost and salt. Rupert Jannasch, Ironwood Farm ACORN Greenhouse Workshop Feb 28, 2012

High Carbon Wood Fly Ash as a Biochar Soil Amendment

Improving Your Grass With Calcium Sulfate

Matching Trees to Planting Sites

Chapter 2.2. Basic Soil-Plant Interactions. learning objectives

Soils. Living in the Environment, 15 th Edition, Miller

Know Your Soil Getting the Dirt on Your Dirt FWAA. Dr. Steve Petrie Director of Agronomic Services

Unlock your soil s potential with K-humate

EARTH SCIENCE CONCEPTS -Geologic time scale

Peters. Peters Professional and Peters Excel provide a wide selection of the highest quality water-soluble fertilisers available

MICROBIAL RESPIRATION AND NITROGEN MINERALIZATION IN SOIL AMENDED WITH DIFFERENT PROPORTIONS OF VERMICOMPOST AND COIR DUST

Nutrient Management Plan for Turf Establishment on Roadside Projects Virginia Department of Transportation

Practical use of Gypsum for Crop Production

The Nature of Soil Soil Conservation Sustainable Ag.

SECTION SOIL PREPARATION

Soil is. Pieces of rock Minerals Decaying organic matter Water Air Living organisms All mixed together!

Effect of Method of Application of Double Superphosphate on the Yield and Phosphorus Uptake by Sugar Beets 1

Fertigation. There are four fundamental components for success with fertigation: 1) Do not irrigate longer than 1 hour at a time.

Nutrient Deficiencies

ANIMAL, PLANT & SOIL SCIENCE D3-2 SOIL CHEMISTRY

EFFECTS OF THICKNESS OF TOPSOIL AND NUTRIENTS ON WHEAT YIELD AT RECLAIMED DEPOSITED FLY ASH SOILS IN THE MINING AREA OF HUAINAN CITY

SOIL TEST HANDBOOK FOR GEORGIA

Soil Nutrient Management

Getting the Most out of Your Strawberry Soil Test Report. General Information

CHECKLIST NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT

Ombrogenous Peat Swamps and Development

Sugarbeets Enjoy Warm Winter

Managing Phosphorus Fertilization of Citrus using Soil Testing 1

Organic Fertilizers. Disadvantages. Advantages

Understanding the Balance

ACTIVITY 2 How Does Your Garden Grow?

Appropriate Analyses for New Mexico Soils and Interpreting Soil Test Results

LaMotte. Soil Test Kit Garden Guide.

DIRT! APES Laboratory Activity

Humisphere SOIL RECONNAISSANCE MISSION TO 3 ESTATES IN TANZANIA. Ir. J.H.M. (Hans) Scholten

1. The Nature of Soils and Soil Fertility

Farmers need to develop an understanding

5.1 Introduction to Soil Systems IB ESS Mrs. Page

Relationships between soil characters and nutrients uptake of three sugar beet varieties grown in newly reclaimed soil

Soil & Fertilizer. Pam Brown, Extension Agent Emeritus, Gardening Coach

Utilization of Phosphorus From Various Fertilizer Materials By Sugar Beets in Colorado 1

Understanding Soil Variability to Utilize Variable Rate Fertilizer Technology

Sunlight. Chlorophyll

The Exciting World Beneath Our Feet.

Use of fertilizers is needed for all types of long-term crop production in order to achieve yield levels which make the effort of cropping worthwhile

NUTRITION FOR GREENHOUSE TOMATOES

Practical use of Gypsum for Crop Production. Joe Nester Nester Ag, LLC Bryan, OH

Collecting Soil Samples for Testing

9 How growers can assess compost quality?

Lecture 5 SOIL FORMING PROCESSES

Do Now: From which materials do you think soil is made? Are all soils the same? Think of some ways that they are different?

POUR THRU TESTING OF CONTAINER MEDIA

O horizon: the O-horizon is made up of organic material. The horizon is found at the soil surface.

Anorganic Fertilizer. Lenny Sri Nopriani, SP.MP

Transcription:

1 PHOSPHORUS AVAILABILITY IN RELATION TO SOIL ph IN CANE BELT AREAS OF FIJI Nazeea Bano, Milika Vaniqi, Merlyn Goundar Sugar Research Institute of Fiji, P.O Box 3560, Lautoka, Fiji. Corresponding author: nazeeab@srif.org.fj Abstract Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) is an economically important crop in Fiji since the 1880 s. It is an important source of income and employment for the farming communities of the country. Sugarcane is cultivated in tropical and sub-tropical regions of the world, in a range of climates from hot dry environment near sea level, to cool and moist environment at higher elevations. It is a heavy feeder of nutrients such as nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, hence, soils has to be continuously tested for its available nutrient contents for its potential to produce optimum cane and sugar yields. Phosphorus is an essential nutrient required for growth and development of sugarcane plants. Availability of phosphorus is primarily dependent on the ph through interaction of minerals; iron, aluminum, and calcium with phosphorus in the soil. Three hundred and seventy six (376) soil samples from sugarcane growing fields were collected for analysis of available phosphorus and soil ph. The results of the samples were grouped into 50 soils from each soil reaction categories and the correlation between soil ph and available phosphorus were calculated. The study revealed that there is not any strong positive correlation between the soil ph and available phosphorus. The correlations were positive in all soil reaction categories, however, all were non-significant. Keywords: Sugarcane, Saccharum officinarum L., Phosphorus, ph, Fiji.

2 INTRODUCTION Soil analysis is a valuable tool for soil scientists, agronomists and farmers worldwide. Soils undergo change constantly and the soil analysis provides a measure of the soil s ability to supply nutrient elements needed for optimum plant growth. The quantity and availability of plant nutrient elements in the soil change due to removal by harvesting crops, leaching, erosion, and addition of fertilizers (Baggett 2012). Thus, soil analysis reveals the current fertility status of soil and recommendations are made to meet the nutrient requirements for any particular crop. One of the most important factors in determining availability of plant nutrients in the soil is soil ph. According to Netafim s agriculture department (n.d), the optimum soil ph required for growing sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) is 6.5; however, sugarcane has been found growing in very acidic soils in Fiji (Hartemink 2008). Several plant nutrients are not easily available in very strongly acidic or very strongly alkaline soils. This is due to the various reactions in the soil that fix the nutrients and convert them to the form that is unavailable to the plants. (Pandey 2013). Phosphorus is an essential macronutrient that promotes root growth, stimulates tillering, influences millable cane growth, and impacts on the sugarcane yield per hectare. Bokhtiar and Sakurai (2003) observed significant and profitable increases in sugarcane yields due to phosphorous fertilization. Sugarcane will grow slowly with low levels of phosphorus in the soil (Watson and Mullen 2007). Sugarcane is a heavy feeder of phosphorus and removes about 0.4 0.8 kg phosphorus per ton of cane when harvested. Phosphorus is found largely in its oxidized state as orthophosphate mostly as complexes with calcium, iron, aluminum and silicate minerals. The ability of soil to provide phosphorus to plants is determined by the quantities of orthophosphates in the soil solution and the solubility of iron and aluminum phosphates with hydrous oxide and clay minerals in acid soils (Stevenson 1986). Phosphates are readily precipitated as the highly insoluble iron and aluminum phosphates or adsorbed to oxide surfaces. At low ph, iron and aluminum metallic ions are more available. The solubility improves as the ph approaches nearly neutral conditions. The maximum solubility and plant availability of phosphorus is at ph 6.5 (Hopkins and Ellsworth 2005). Hossain et al (2014), and Pandey et al (2013), observed that phosphorus availability was higher in slightly acidic soil than in the very strongly acidic soil. The aim of this study is to study the correlation of available phosphorous with soil ph at different soil reaction categories on soil under sugarcane cultivation in Fiji. MATERIALS AND METHOD The weather of the sugarcane belt is characterized by tropical climate with mean annual rainfall of about 2,000 mm (Fiji Meteorological Service 2006). The wet season is from November to April, and a dry season from May to October. Rainfall is usually abundant during the wet season. In Fiji, sugarcane is planted from March to May and August to October. Prior to planting, soil samples are taken out for chemical analysis which is used to recommend fertilizer rates for the field. Most of phosphorus fertilizer is applied into furrows at the time of planting. Additional phosphorus fertilizer is added in 4-6 weeks old ratoons. Study site

3 A total of 376 soil samples were collected from fallow fields from 38 sugarcane sectors within four sugar mill areas (Lautoka, Rarawai, Labasa & Penang) prior to land preparation between March-June, 2014. Figure 1. Map of Vitilevu showing sugarcane sectors within three mill areas (Lautoka, Penang & Rarawai)

4 Figure 2. Map of Vanualevu showing sugarcane sectors within Labasa mill area For each field, 20 subsamples were collected at a depth of 0-20 cm from an area of 0.4 ha. These subsamples were mixed thoroughly to prepare a representative sample. Soil samples were collected from cane belt area and were analyzed at Sugar research institute of Fiji s analytical laboratory. From these samples, 200 samples were randomly selected for the study. The categories of different soil reactions selected, number of samples under each category and range of parameter under study is shown in Table 1. Table 1. The selected category of soil reactions, number of soil samples. Categories of soil reaction ph range Number of samples (ph) Very strongly acid 4.0-4.4 50 Strongly acid 4.5-4.8 50 Acid 4.9-5.4 50 Moderately acid 5.5-6.1 50 Total number of samples 200 Collected soil samples were air dried, grounded to <2 mm and stored in properly labeled plastic bags for analysis. Soil ph was recorded by Meterohm 867 ph module from soil water suspension at the ratio of 1:5. Available phosphorus (P) was determined by Modified Troug available phosphorus method using 0.02 N Sulphuric acid (H 2 SO 4 ) and 0.3 % Ammonium Sulphate (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4. Phosphorus was determined using Flow Injection Analysis. After the analysis, the mean values of available phosphorus content was classified into very low, low, medium, high and very high (Table 2). Table 2. Classification of phosphorus content in the soil.

5 Categories of P Phosphorus ratings Very low <4-9 Low 10-18 Medium 19-34 High 35 79 Very High 80 - >119 The linear correlation of the available phosphorus with ph of the soil was calculated within the four different soil reactions categories separately using excel worksheet and their significance were tested at 0.05 and 0.01 levels of probability. The mean for the ph and available phosphorus content of the different categories of the soil under the study were also calculated (Table 3). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The soil ph statuses were classified under four descriptive ranges such as very strongly acid, strongly acid, acid, moderately acid (Damuni et al. 1996). Fifty (50) soil samples were analyzed for each of the category. Table 3. Means of different parameters of four different soil reaction categories. Soil Parameters Very strongly Strongly acid Acid Moderately acid acid ph 4.2 4.7 5.2 5.7 Available Phosphorus 14 21 34 78 Available phosphorus ranges from very low to very high in all soil reaction categories. The mean available phosphorus is highest (78 ppm) in moderately acidic soil while it is lowest (14 ppm) in very strongly acid soil (Table 3). Phosphorus availability increased from slightly acidic to strongly acidic soil (Table 3).

6 120 100 y = 11.345x - 33.905 r = 0.089 n = 50 Availabe phosphorus 80 60 40 20 0 3.9 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 Soil ph Graph 1. Correlation of ph with available phosphorus at very strongly acid category. Availabe phosphorus 300 250 200 150 100 50 Strongly acid y = -30.128x + 161.77 r = 0.100 n = 50 0 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 Soil ph Graph 2: Correlation of ph with available phosphorus at strongly acid category.

7 Availabe phosphorus 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 Acid y = 59.926x - 276.06 r = 0.409 n = 50 0 4.8 4.9 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 Soil ph Graph 3: Correlation of ph with available phosphorus at acid category. Availabe phosphorus 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Moderately Acid y = 46.921x - 192.1 r = 0.195 n = 50 5.4 5.6 5.8 6.0 6.2 Soil ph Graph 4: Correlation of ph with available phosphorus at moderately acid category. Soil ph was correlated with phosphorus availability in soil at different soil reactions. The correlation of soil ph with available phosphorus was non-significant in all the soil reactions (Figures 1-4). The correlation is positive in all the categories. The correlation is the highest in acid category (r = 0.409) while it is lowest in very strongly acid category (r = 0.089). The study showed that phosphorus availability is higher in moderately acidic soil (Fig. 4). This concurs with Hossain et al (2014) who observed that phosphorus availability was higher in slightly acidic soil than in very strongly acidic soil. Furthermore, there was a non-significant correlation of soil ph with available phosphorus (Hossain et al. 2014). Similarly, Pandey et al (2013) reported non-significant correlations of soil ph with available phosphorus at all soil reactions. The highest correlation value being r = -0.458 and the lowest r = -0.013. Correlations of soil ph with available phosphorus was found to be non-significant in all soil reactions. CONCLUSION

8 The study revealed that the correlations of soil ph with available phosphorus are nonsignificant in all soil reaction categories. However, positive correlation were obtained in all soil reaction categories with the highest value in acid category (r = 0.409) and the lowest in very strongly acid category (r = 0.089). Phosphorus availability increased from slightly acidic to strongly acidic soil. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT We would like to thank Mr. Jai Gawander and Mr. Prem Naidu for their guidance and assistance in editing of this paper. REFERENCES Ayres, A. S. and Hagihara, H. H. (1952). "Available phosphorus in Hawaiian Soil Profiles. Hawaiian Planters' Record, 54 : 81-99. Baggett, J. 2012. The importance of soil testing. Cornell university cooperative extension of Schenectady County. Retrieved on 06 November 2012 from www.cceschenectady.org. Bokhtiar, S.M., Sakurai, K. (2003). Sugarcane response to soil phosphorus. Better crops international Vol 17, No.1 20-25. Daly, B. and Hill, L. 2008. Recommended methods for soil, plant and water analysis. South Pacific agricultural chemistry laboratory network (SPACNET). 169p Damuni,S., Gawander,J., & Morrison, J. (1996). Quality assurance and quality control and recommendations. Sugarcane research Centre, Lautoka, Fiji. Fiji Meteorological Service. (2006, April 28). The Climate of Fiji. Retrieved November 10, 2014, from http://www.met.gov.fj/climateoffiji.pdf Hartemink, A. E. (2008). Sugarcane for bioethanol: Soil and environmental issues. Advances in Agronomy Vol 99, 125-182. Henriques, C., Killorn, R. (2005). Soil P forms and P uptake under intensive plat growth in the greenhouse. Aronomia Costarricense 29(2): 83-97. Hopkins, B., and Ellsworth, J. 2005. Phosphorus availability with alkaline/calcareous soil. Western nutrient management conference. University of Idhao, Idhao Falls Vol 6 Hossain, I., Kashem, O., and Sarkar, A. (2014). Correlations of available phosphorus and potassium with ph and organic matter content in the different forested soils of Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bagladesh. International journal of forests, soil and erosion Vol. 4 No. 1: 7-10. Netafim s agriculture department. (n.d). Soil requirement. Retrieved 24October 2014 from http://www.sugarcanecrops.com/soil_requirement/ Pandey, S., Thapa, K.B., and Oli, I.B. (2013). Correlations of available phosphorus and potassium with soil ph and organic matter content at different soil reactions categories in soils of Western Development Region, Nepal. Journal of chemical, biological and physical sciences Vol 3, No. 1, 128-133.

9 Rayment, G.E and Higginson (1992) - Australian Laboratory Handbook of Soil and Water Chemical methods. "Acid - Extractable Phosphorus" - p. 79, 83-84. Steveson, F. J. (1986). Cycles of soil. John Wiley & sons, Inc. United States of America, 1986 South African Sugar Experiment Station - Lab Directive 1990,.B/LO/12.2.1126, May 1977. Watson, M., Mullen, R. (2007). Understanding soil tests for plant-available phosphorus. The Ohio State University: Ohio June 2007. Retrieved from http://ohioline.osu.edu/agffact/pdf/soil_tests.pdf