Range Production (Unfavorable Year)

Similar documents
Depth to a Selected Soil Restrictive Layer

Depth to Any Soil Restrictive Layer

Percent Silt. Ontario County, New York Survey Area Version and Date: 13-09/24/2016

Linear Extensibility

Cation-Exchange Capacity (CEC-7)

Liquid Limit. Ontario County, New York Survey Area Version and Date: 13-09/24/2016

Surface Texture. Layer Option: Surface Layer Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Tie-break Rule: Lower

Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity (Ksat), Standard Classes

Drainage Class. Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Tie-break Rule: Higher. Ontario County, New York Survey Area Version and Date: 13-09/24/2016

Electrical Conductivity (EC)

Effective Cation-Exchange Capacity (ECEC)

Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR)

Farmland Classification

K Factor, Whole Soil

Percent Clay. Ontario County, New York Survey Area Version and Date: 13-09/24/2016

Hydrologic Soil Group

Potential for Seedling Mortality

Erosion Hazard (Off-Road, Off-Trail)

Soil Taxonomy Classification

Oneida County Soil Survey ID Number Name Slope/Descriptor 55A Adams Loamy Sand 0-3% slopes 55B Adams Loamy Sand 3-8% slopes 55C Adams Loamy Sand

Any County, New York. Custom Soil Resource Report for. Homer Vegetable Research Farm. United States Department of Agriculture

Custom Soil Resource Report for Tompkins County, New York

This section describes the geologic, soil, and topographic conditions of the Nation s four properties and immediately surrounding area.

Custom Soil Resource Report for Ulster County, New York

Area 3 Envirothon Soils Questions Key


Custom Soil Resource Report for State of Connecticut

Custom Soil Resource Report for Columbia County, New York

Custom Soil Resource Report for State of Connecticut

Section 1. Judging the soil pit (questions 1-4)

Custom Soil Resource Report for Orange County, Virginia

Soil types of lake county

Custom Soil Resource Report for Orange County, New York, and Sussex County, New Jersey

NRCS Soils Report. Grand River Gathering LLC K28E Compressor Station. OA Project No

Aerial Map. map center: 38 0' 55.53, ' S-4E Franklin County Illinois

Soils and their Relationship with Agriculture

Lane County Land Management Division

2016 Area 3 Envirothon Muskingum County Soils Test ANSWER KEY

Soils and Land Use Test

TP73 4PTP101 TP45 TP9 TP74 TP46 TP47 TP115 TP48 TP32 TP5 TP31 TP22 TP49 V58 TP57 4F TP50 TP51 3PD 3PD TP80 TP28 TP55

Soil characteristics that influence nitrogen and water management

Custom Soil Resource Report for Craighead County, Arkansas

280 ACRES - HOWELL COUNTY, MO

NRCS Soils Report. Encana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc. C19 Injection Well. OA Project No

September 20, 2016 Soils Investigation for Agricultural Designation Windemere Place, Missoula County, Montana

SOIL SEPARATES. Soil Evaluator Day 2, Presentation 3-3/27/2018. Soil Texture, Page 1 TITLE 5 SOIL EVALUATOR CERTIFICATION TRAINING SOIL TEXTURE

Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map

Yields of Non-Irrigated Crops (Component): Soybeans (Bu) Edgecombe County, North Carolina, and Halifax... (SOYBEANS)

80 ACRES M/L BOONE COUNTY, IOWA LISTING # Pilot Mound, Iowa. I Avenue. 130th Street. Co Hwy P th Street

+/- 60 AC LAND FOR SALE HARLEY ROAD, ELBURN, IL 60119

Custom Soil Resource Report for Alsea Area, Oregon, and Lincoln County Area, Oregon

Geology, Soils, and Topography October 13, ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS, MITIGATION. 3.1 Geology, Soils, and Topography

Farmland Classification Centre County, Pennsylvania (Student Farm Site) Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

SW CORNER ROUTE 38 AND HARLEY ROAD SW CORNER ROUTE 38 & HARLEY ROAD, KANE COUNTY, IL 60119

BENNING ROAD & BRIDGES TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS NRCS SOIL RESOURCE REPORT DRAFT MAY 2016

Lesson 1: Recognizing the Characteristics of Soils and the Soil Requirements for Fruit and Nut Crops

Photographs and Descriptions of Representative Pedons by Site

SOILS IN URBAN / SUBURBAN LANDSCAPES. Lisa Krall Soil Scientist CT USDA NRCS Tolland, CT

Custom Soil Resource Report for Fond du Lac County, Wisconsin

Do Now: From which materials do you think soil is made? Are all soils the same? Think of some ways that they are different?

APPENDIX A SOIL RESOURCES REPORTS

STATE TAX COMMISSION OF MISSOURI ASSESSOR MANUAL

Horner-McLaughlin Woods: Soil Types

Soil testing Page 1. Contrary to what is widely believed, the colour of the soil reveals very little about its fertility.

2011 Wisconsin Envirothon Soils and Land Use Exam

~ NRCS. Custom Soil Resource Report for Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties. USDA United States ~ Department of Agriculture

Custom Soil Resource Report for Cibola Area, New Mexico, Parts of Cibola, McKinley, and Valencia Counties

CLAY, SANDY AND PEAT SOILS, AND SOIL ORGANIC MATTER

Custom Soil Resource Report for Polk County, Oregon

Soil Texture = %Sand, Silt & Clay in a soil.

Soil Survey of Nelson County, Virginia

Submittal Document II.I. USDA NRCS Soil Resources Report

Custom Soil Resource Report for Kane County, Illinois

Custom Soil Resource Report for Franklin County, Washington

Lesson 1: Identifying Texture in Soil

Survey of Texas Vineyard Soils

Girtridge Monitor Farm Meeting

URBAN SOILS & SEATTLE EXAMPLES

Soil Interpretations Erosion and Sedimentation Control Planning and Design Workshop

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clearfield County, Pennsylvania

DO YOU KNOW YOUR SOILS? (Rev. 10/11)

Custom Soil Resource Report for Yamhill Area, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Southampton County, Virginia

Land Capability Classifications

STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION WITTON PARK, COUNTY DURHAM PROPOSED QUARRY EXTENSION DECEMBER 1992

Soil Survey of San Luis Obispo County, California Paso Robles Area

2012 FINAL SOILS AREA 2 Envirothon Questions Answer KEY

Custom Soil Resource Report for Hancock County Area, Maine

Draft Resource Report 7 Soils. FERC Docket No.PF Pre-filing draft October Public

LAND FOR SALE 82 ACRES M/L CEDAR COUNTY, IOWA LISTING # DOUGLAS R. YEGGE C: O:

Custom Soil Resource Report for Pope County, Illinois

Custom Soil Resource Report for Centre County, Pennsylvania

WALKER FEEDLOT Total taxable acres, part fenced. 4 homes & multiple nice/modern outbldgs hd feedyard with sprinklers a-shkd-0002

Soil Survey of Ashtabula County, Ohio

Soil & Fertilizer. Pam Brown, Extension Agent Emeritus, Gardening Coach

EXAMPLE Point A: Sandy Loam: 65% Sand _ 20% Silt _ 15% Clay. Point B: %Sand % Silt % Clay. Point C: %Sand % Silt % Clay. Point D: %Sand % Silt % Clay

RaC. RaD GlG. GlF. RaD GlE. CeA. RaE. RcD. GoF. GoF SkC. SkD. CfA. AdA. GoF. GoF. GoF. RcD. GgD. GoF. RaE GlE. RaE DbF. GoF. DbE. RaC.

Understanding Soil Texture and Structure

Soil Science Curriculum

Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No Waiau

Transcription:

name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 45, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 4A Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3 5A Wayland soils complex, 0 to 3, 60 frequently flooded 12D Rockrift channery silt loam, 15 to 25 85 13F Rock outcrop-arnot complex, 35 to 80, extremely stony 14D Cadosia channery silt loam, 15 to 25 85 15A Guyanoga channery silt loam, fan, 0 to 3 15B Guyanoga channery silt loam, fan, 3 to 8 16A Almond channery silt loam, 0 to 3 80 16B Almond channery silt loam, 3 to 8 80 16C Almond channery silt loam, 8 to 15 80 18A Homer fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 19A Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic, Typic Argiaquolls, 80 0 to 3 20A Atherton and Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic, Typic Argiaquolls, 0 to 3 24A Howard gravelly loam, 0 to 3 80 24B Howard gravelly loam, 3 to 8 80 24C Howard gravelly loam, 8 to 15 80 24D Howard soils, 15 to 25 65 25A Chenango gravelly loam, 0 to 3 25B Chenango gravelly loam, 3 to 8 25C Chenango gravelly loam, 8 to 15 25D Chenango gravelly loam, 15 to 25 25E Chenango gravelly loam, 25 to 35 26B Chenango channery loam, fan, 3 to 8 85 27B Castile gravelly silt loam, 3 to 8 85 31A Collamer silt loam, 0 to 3 85 31B Collamer silt loam, 3 to 8 85 31C Collamer silt loam, 8 to 15 85 31D Collamer silt loam, 15 to 25 32A Dunkirk fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 32B Dunkirk fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 33A Dunkirk silt loam, 0 to 3 33B Dunkirk silt loam, 3 to 8 33C Dunkirk silt loam, 8 to 15 33D Dunkirk silt loam, 15 to 25 33E Dunkirk silt loam, 25 to 35 34A Lakemont silty clay loam, 0 to 3 85 35A Odessa silt loam, 0 to 3 35B Odessa silty clay loam, 3 to 8 Page 1 of 6

name 36A Schoharie silty clay loam, 0 to 3 36B Schoharie silty clay loam, 3 to 8 36C Schoharie silty clay loam, 8 to 15 36D Schoharie silty clay loam, 15 to 25 36E Schoharie silty clay loam, 25 to 45 37A Schoharie silt loam, 0 to 3 37B Schoharie silt loam, 3 to 8 38A Niagara silt loam, 0 to 3 85 38B Niagara silt loam, 3 to 8 85 39A Rhinebeck silty clay loam, 0 to 3 41A Aeric Epiaquepts, 0 to 3 50 43A Canandaigua silt loam, 0 to 3 44A Canandaigua mucky silt loam, 0 to 3 45A Fonda mucky silt loam, 0 to 3 95 46A Galen fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 46B Galen fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 48A Arkport fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 95 48B Arkport fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 95 48C Arkport fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 95 48D Arkport fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 49B Arkport loamy fine sand, 3 to 8 95 49D Arkport loamy fine sand, 15 to 25 95 49E Arkport loamy fine sand, 25 to 35 49F Arkport loamy fine sand, 35 to 55 50B Dunkirk-Arkport complex, 3 to 8 50 50C Dunkirk-Arkport complex, 8 to 15 60 50D Dunkirk-Arkport complex, 15 to 25 60 53A Lamson fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 54A Lamson mucky fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 56A Elnora loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 58B Colonie loamy fine sand, 3 to 8 95 58C Colonie loamy fine sand, 8 to 15 95 62B Mardin channery silt loam, 3 to 8 85 62C Mardin channery silt loam, 8 to 15 85 62D Mardin channery silt loam, 15 to 25 85 62E Mardin channery silt loam, 25 to 35 85 63B Langford channery silt loam, 3 to 8 63C Langford channery silt loam, 8 to 15 pecent 63D Langford channery silt loam, 15 to 25 64B Langford-Erie channery silt loams, 3 to 8 55 66A Lyons silt loam, 0 to 3 68A Volusia channery silt loam, 0 to 3 95 68B Volusia channery silt loam, 3 to 8 68C Volusia channery silt loam, 8 to 15 Page 2 of 6

name 68D Volusia channery silt loam, 15 to 25 95 69A Erie channery silt loam, 0 to 3 95 69B Erie channery silt loam, 3 to 8 95 69C Erie channery silt loam, 8 to 15 95 71A Darien silt loam, 0 to 3 95 71B Darien silt loam, 3 to 8 95 71C Darien silt loam, 8 to 15 95 72A Darien-Ilion silt loams, 0 to 3 68 72B Darien-Ilion silt loams, 3 to 8 68 73B Gretor silt loam, 3 to 8 95 73C Gretor silt loam, 8 to 15 95 73D Gretor channery silt loam, 15 to 25 76B Orpark silt loam, 3 to 8 95 76C Orpark silt loam, 8 to 15 95 76D Orpark channery silt loam, 15 to 25 77A Chippewa silt loam, 0 to 3 77B Chippewa silt loam, 3 to 8 82B Manlius channery silt loam, 3 to 8 95 82C Manlius channery silt loam, 8 to 15 95 82D Manlius channery silt loam, 15 to 25 95 91A Palms muck, 0 to 3 55 92A Carlisle muck, 0 to 3 45 93A Edwards muck, 0 to 3 50 94A Martisco muck, 0 to 3 55 95A Saprists, 0 to 3, inundated 85 101A Honeoye loam, 0 to 3 98 101B Honeoye loam, 3 to 8 98 101C Honeoye loam, 8 to 15 98 101D Honeoye loam, 15 to 25 99 101E Honeoye loam, 25 to 35 99 104A Honeoye loam, 0 to 3, lower clay 98 surface 104B Honeoye loam, 3 to 8, lower clay 98 surface 104C Honeoye loam, 8 to 15, lower clay 98 surface 106B Danley-Lansing complex, 3 to 8 50 107B Conesus-Lansing loams, 3 to 8 50 108C Lansing silt loam, 8 to 15 95 108D Lansing silt loam, 15 to 25 95 108E Lansing silt loam, 25 to 35 95 112B Ontario fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 112C Ontario fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 95 112D Ontario fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 95 112E Ontario fine sandy loam, 25 to 35 93 114B Ontario gravelly loam, 3 to 8 98 114C Ontario gravelly loam, 8 to 15 95 Page 3 of 6

name 114D Ontario gravelly loam, 15 to 25 95 116B Ontario loam, 3 to 8 116C Ontario loam, 8 to 15 95 116D Ontario loam, 15 to 25 95 118F Ontario, Honeoye and Lansing soils, 35 to 55 120E Palmyra and Howard soils, 25 to 45 55 122A Palmyra cobbly loam, 0 to 3 95 122B Palmyra cobbly loam, 3 to 8 95 124A Palmyra fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 124B Palmyra fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 126A Palmyra gravelly loam, 0 to 3 95 126B Palmyra gravelly loam, 3 to 8 95 126C Palmyra gravelly loam, 8 to 15 126D Palmyra gravelly loam, 15 to 25 128A Palmyra gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 3 128B Palmyra gravelly sandy loam, 3 to 8 128C Palmyra gravelly sandy loam, 8 to 15 130A Farmington loam, 0 to 3 130B Farmington loam, 3 to 8 132A Galoo loam, 0 to 3, rocky 95 132B Galoo loam, 3 to 8, rocky 95 134A Camillus silt loam, 0 to 3 95 134B Camillus silt loam, 3 to 8 95 151C Willdin-Norchip complex, 3 to 15 60 152B Valois gravelly loam, 3 to 8 85 152C Valois gravelly loam, 8 to 15 85 152D Valois gravelly loam, 15 to 25 85 152E Valois gravelly loam, 25 to 35 85 153B Valois gravelly loam, cool, 3 to 8 85 153C Valois gravelly loam, cool, 8 to 15 85 153D Valois gravelly loam, cool, 15 to 25 85 153E Valois gravelly loam, cool, 25 to 35 85 162B Willdin channery silt loam, 3 to 8 85 162C Willdin channery silt loam, 8 to 15 85 162D Willdin channery silt loam, 15 to 25 85 168A Ontusia channery silt loam, 0 to 3 95 168B Ontusia channery silt loam, 3 to 8 95 168C Ontusia channery silt loam, 8 to 15 95 168D Ontusia channery silt loam, 15 to 25 95 171C Lordstown-Manlius-Towerville complex, 8 to 15 171D Lordstown-Manlius-Towerville complex, 15 to 25, very stony 171E Lordstown-Manlius-Towerville complex, 25 to 35, extremely stony Page 4 of 6

name 171F Lordstown-Manlius-Towerville complex, 35 to 80, extremely stony 177A Norchip silt loam, 0 to 3 177B Norchip silt loam, 3 to 8 181B Mongaup-Ischua complex, 3 to 8 45 181C Mongaup-Ischua complex, 8 to 15 45 181D Mongaup-Ischua complex, 15 to 25, 45 very stony 181E Mongaup-Ischua complex, 25 to 35, 45 extremely stony 182B Mongaup channery loam, 3 to 8 75 182C Mongaup channery loam, 8 to 15 75 201A Lima loam, 0 to 3 85 201B Lima loam, 3 to 8 201C Lima loam, 8 to 15 95 204A Lima loam, 0 to 3, lower clay surface 204B Lima loam, 3 to 8, lower clay surface 95 210A Phelps gravelly silt loam, 0 to 3 85 210B Phelps gravelly silt loam, 3 to 8 85 212A Nuhi silt loam, 0 to 3 85 2B Aurora-Angola silt loams, 3 to 8 60 2C Aurora-Angola silt loams, 8 to 15 60 2D Aurora-Angola silt loams, 15 to 25 60 241B Aurora silt loam, 3 to 8 85 241C Aurora silt loam, 8 to 15 85 241D Aurora silt loam, 15 to 25 85 255B Cazenovia silt loam, 3 to 8 85 255C Cazenovia silt loam, 8 to 15 85 255D Cazenovia silt loam, 15 to 25 85 260B Cayuga silt loam, 3 to 8 85 260C Cayuga silt loam, 8 to 15 85 260D Cayuga silt loam, 15 to 25 85 304A Kendaia loam, 0 to 3 304B Kendaia loam, 3 to 8 342A Angola silt loam, 0 to 3 356A Ovid silt loam, 0 to 3 85 356B Ovid silt loam, 3 to 8 85 357B Ovid silty clay loam, 3 to 8 85 357C Ovid silty clay loam, 8 to 15 85 0A Udorthents, loamy, 0 to 3 80 1D Udorthents, refuse substratum. 0 to 25 PG Pits, gravel and sand 75 PQ Pits, quarry 80 W Water 100 Page 5 of 6

Options Attribute Name: Total range production is the amount of vegetation that can be expected to grow annually in a well managed area that is supporting the potential natural plant community. It includes all vegetation, whether or not it is palatable to grazing animals. It includes the current year's growth of leaves, twigs, and fruits of woody plants. It does not include the increase in stem diameter of trees and shrubs. It is expressed in pounds per acre of air-dry vegetation. In an unfavorable year, growing conditions are well below average, generally because of low available soil moisture. Yields are adjusted to a common of air-dry moisture content. In areas that have similar climate and topography, differences in the kind and amount of vegetation produced on rangeland are closely related to the kind of soil. Effective management is based on the relationship between the soils and vegetation and water. Aggregation is the process by which a set of component attribute values is reduced to a single value to represent the map unit as a whole. A map unit is typically composed of one or more "components". A component is either some type of soil or some nonsoil entity, e.g., rock outcrop. The components in the map unit name represent the major soils within a map unit delineation. Minor components make up the balance of the map unit. Great differences in soil properties can occur between map unit components and within short distances. Minor components may be very different from the major components. Such differences could significantly affect use and management of the map unit. Minor components may or may not be documented in the database. The results of aggregation do not reflect the presence or absence of limitations of the components which are not listed in the database. An on-site investigation is required to identify the location of individual map unit components. For each of a map unit's components, a corresponding composition is recorded. A composition of 60 indicates that the corresponding component typically makes up approximately 60% of the map unit. Percent composition is a critical factor in some, but not all, aggregation methods. For the attribute being aggregated, the first step of the aggregation process is to derive one attribute value for each of a map unit's components. From this set of component attributes, the next step of the aggregation process derives a single value that represents the map unit as a whole. Once a single value for each map unit is derived, a thematic map for soil map units can be generated. Aggregation must be done because, on any soil map, map units are delineated but components are not. The aggregation method "Dominant Component" returns the attribute value associated with the component with the highest composition in the map unit. If more than one component shares the highest composition, the corresponding "tie-break" rule determines which value should be returned. The "tie-break" rule indicates whether the lower or higher attribute value should be returned in the case of a composition tie. The result returned by this aggregation method may or may not represent the dominant condition throughout the map unit. The tie-break rule indicates which value should be selected from a set of multiple candidate values, or which value should be selected in the event of a composition tie. This option indicates that a null value for a component should be converted to zero before aggregation occurs. This will be done only if a map unit has at least one component where this value is not null. Page 6 of 6