Managing Phosphorus to Optimize Potato Tuber Yield in the San Luis Valley

Similar documents
POTATO VARIETY RESPONSE TO PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZER

Effects of Phosphorus and Calcium on Tuber Set, Yield, and Quality in Goldrush Potato

Table 4. Nutrient uptake and removal by sunflower in Manitoba studies. Nutrient Uptake Removal Uptake Removal

THE EFFECTS OF MINITUBER SIZE AND HARVEST DATE ON GERMINATION, TUBER SET, AND YIELD OF RUSSET BURBANK POTATOES. Steven R. James '

Sugarbeets Enjoy Warm Winter

Effect of Method of Application of Double Superphosphate on the Yield and Phosphorus Uptake by Sugar Beets 1

Nutrient Considerations for Olives

Potatoes (2007) Potatoes Comparisons of Nitrogen Sources and Foliars (2008) Potatoes Nitrogen Types (2008) Potato Seed Piece Direct Fertilizer

Monopotassium Phosphate-Based Starter Fertilizers Enhance Snapbean Yield in Florida George J. Hochmuth 1

Unlock your soil s potential with K-humate

G A Gardener's Guide for Soil and Nutrient Management in Growing Vegetables

Soil Science Curriculum

Getting the Most out of Your Strawberry Soil Test Report. General Information

8. Fertility Management

Nutrient Management of Irrigated Alfalfa and Timothy

LEAF & SOIL SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS TO ADJUST CITRUS FERTILIZER PROGRAMS. Mongi Zekri

Steven R. James and Gary L. Reed

Fertilizers and nutrient management for hops. Diane Brown, Michigan State University Extension

Soil. Acidic soils... 1/19/2014

Definitions in Handbook

Alpine Russet Management Recommendations Idaho

The Effects of Soil Acidity on Phosphorus Uptake. by Vegetable Crops in Hestern Oregon- W. A. Sheets,-

Fertilizing Grass for Hay and Pasture

Lesco Fertilizer Evaluation

Cool Season Vegetables and Strawberry Response to Phosphates Research and Observations over the last Ten Years

Soil Test Report. HOME GARDEN VEGETABLE GARDEN Analysis Results

PROUDLY MADE IN AUSTRALIA

FERTILITY MANAGEMENT FOR TOMATOES AND PEPPERS

Soil test recommendations

Vine Nutrition. A g e n d a 4/10/2017. Soil How to sample Sample submission sheet Lab analysis & results Interpretation

Soils and Fertilizers. Leo Espinoza Soils Specialist

Influence of Fungicides and Biological Products on Potato Diseases and Yukon Gold Yield and Quality

PASTURE AND HAY FIELDS: SOIL FUNDAMENTALS. Sanders County April 8, Clain Jones

STOLLER ENTERPRISES, INC. World leader in crop nutrition Potato Production Challenge - Page 1 of 9

REVIEW OF AVOCADO FERTILIZER PRACTICES IN SAN DIEGO COUNTY

Potassium Applications and Yellow Shoulder Disorder of Tomatoes in High Tunnels

Making Sense of Soil Tests

Phosphorus Facts Soil, plant, and fertilizer

Influence of Fungicides and Biological Controls on Potato Diseases and Yukon Gold Yield and Quality

EC Sulfur for Alfalfa Production in Nebraska

SOIL SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS

Nutrient Management And Nutrient Cycling Raymond C. Ward, President Ward Laboratories, Inc Kearney, NE

Nutrient Management for Tree Fruit. Mary Concklin Visiting Extension Educator Fruit Production and IPM University of Connecticut

Inherent Factors Affecting Soil ph. Soil ph Management

CHECKLIST NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT

FOLIAR FEEDING and SAR for CITRUS TREES. Mongi Zekri and Gary England University of Florida, IFAS

Sunlight. Chlorophyll

General concept of fertilizer efficiency

High Carbon Wood Fly Ash as a Biochar Soil Amendment

Intro t to S Soilils and S d Soi lil Fertility

Tobacco Fertilization. Andy Bailey

Use of fertilizers is needed for all types of long-term crop production in order to achieve yield levels which make the effort of cropping worthwhile

Workgroup. UCD Alfalfa. Utilizing Plant Tissue Testing & Application Methods to Maximize Fertilizer Efficiency

Know Your Soil Getting the Dirt on Your Dirt FWAA. Dr. Steve Petrie Director of Agronomic Services

Potassium Fertigation and Organic Acids Improving soil and plant nutrition in highbush blueberry.

UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEM SOLID WASTE RESEARCH PROGRAM

areas by Clain Jones, Extension Soil Fertility Specialist

Management strategies for fertigation of sweet cherry

Crop Management Practices. By Simon Bedasie

Were Soil Test Levels Affected by 2012 Drought?

Pecan Production 101: Fertility and Water Use. Lenny Wells University of Georgia

Effect of Five Planting Dates on Yield of Six Sweet Onions

Corn Fertilization. Photo of a healthy, uniform stand of corn. A quick start and high productivity depend a lot on soil fertility.

Inherent Factors Affecting Soil ph. Soil ph Management

SOIL TEST HANDBOOK FOR GEORGIA

Soil Fertility & Fertilizers

TRANSPLANTING METHODS FOR THE CULTIVATION OF CORN LILY (VERATRUM CALIFORNICUM)

Arnold Schumann, Kevin Hostler, Laura Waldo, Wije Bandaranayake (UF/IFAS, CREC) 2015 Fluid Forum February 17, 2015 Scottsdale, AZ

Growing Broccoli at Veg-Acre Farms

Fertility Considerations for Sod Production 1

Demonstrate that inoculation can increase the yield of legumes.

IRRIGATION AND NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT IN TREE FRUIT PRODUCTION SYSTEMS.

EFFECT OF PHOSPHATIC FERTILIZER RATES LEVEL ON GROWTH, CRUDE PROTEIN CONTENT AND NITROGEN FIXATION ABILITY OF ALFALFA AT SOWING YEAR

Soil Test Report. Sample ID Client Information Susan Varlamoff. Results Mehlich I Extractant UGA Lime Buffer Capacity Method*

Greenhouse Plant Nutrition

THE EFFECTS OF HUMATE AND ORGANIC FERTILIZER ON ESTABLISHMENT AND NUTRITION OF CREEPING BENT PUTTING GREENS

Grid or Zone sampling Unfertilized Soybean Fields in the Spring/Summer is Increasing (topsoil only)

Understanding Fertilizers

HealthyGro Fertilizer Trials

Anorganic Fertilizer. Lenny Sri Nopriani, SP.MP

Effect of Soil Amendment with Dry and Wet Distillers Grains on Growth of Canola and Soil Properties

Nutrient Management for Perennial Fruit Crops

Home and Market Garden Fertilization

Understanding Soil Variability to Utilize Variable Rate Fertilizer Technology

Using super oxygenated water in high tunnel tomato and strawberry production

Crop Nutrition and Fertilizer Requirements

General Principles. Figure 1. Nitrogen uptake pattern for winter wheat grown in the Coastal Plain region of Virginia.

GROW & GROWTH. Products BROCHURE. Keeping together is Progress Working together is Success EVERGROW FOR SPECIALITY FERTILIZERS

CLAY, SANDY AND PEAT SOILS, AND SOIL ORGANIC MATTER

Monitoring Nutrition for Crops

Potassium Fertigation In Highbush Blueberry Increases availability of K and other nutrietns in the root zone.

Matted Row Strawberries: The Basics

Section 5: Vegetables and Bulbs

LaMotte. Soil Test Kit Garden Guide.

For nmental. Written By: Agustin o, Professor. Developed in. and justice for all. Department of. funded by activities. )

WOODY AND TURF MANAGEMENT Lesson 14: FERTILIZERS

Farmers need to develop an understanding

GALLATIN GARDENER CLUB APRIL 6, Clain Jones

Evaluating rootzone stresses and the role of the root system on rose crop productivity and fertilizer-water use efficiency:

A&L Canada Laboratories Inc.

Transcription:

Introduction Managing Phosphorus to Optimize Potato Tuber Yield in the San Luis Valley Samuel YC Essah Assistant Professor and State Extension Specialist Colorado State University, San Luis Valley Research Center Soil phosphorus (P) contributes to early crop development and tuber initiation. Adequate soil P also enhances tuber maturation. Phosphorus fertilizer management of potatoes should aim to maximize profit as well as minimize the overuse of P to reduce environmental impacts. Potato responds to P application in soils with low P even though there have been reports of potato responding to P in soils with high P levels. Similarly, potato has been reported not to have responded to P application in some soils with low P levels. There are other factors apart from soil P level that may contribute to the availability of P to potato plants. Therefore, P fertilizer recommendations can vary considerably among regions. Generally, potato will normally not respond to P application in soils testing for high P levels. Poor growing season conditions such as cooler weather may also influence the response of potato to P application. It has been reported that potatoes respond to P fertilization, particularly in soils with high ph and plenty of free lime. Phosphorus deficiency can reduce tuber yield, tuber size, as well as tuber specific gravity. It is therefore important to pay attention to soil P levels in potato production. Phosphorus Uptake The amount of P in soil solution at a given time is between 0.01 to 0.3 ppm (less than 1 lb/a). Daily potato P uptake is very minimal (0.3 to 0.5 lb P/A/day), however, serious deficiencies can develop if available soil P concentrations are inadequate. Therefore, soil P need to be replenished constantly during the growing season from P labile sources that readily dissolve or mineralizes. Soil test P levels using the sodium bicarbonate extraction method is a good measure of soil available P to potatoes in high ph, calcareous soils. Phosphorus Fertilizer Recommendations Soil test P concentration and the amount of free or excess lime (calcium carbonate) are the primary basis for P fertilizer recommendation for potatoes. Excess free lime in the soil tends to precipitate available P and therefore makes P less available to the plant. Table 1 shows general guidelines for P application in potato production. Table1. General guidelines for phosphorus application in potato production ----------------------- Soil Test Phosphorus (ppm) 1 ----------------------------------- Yield Goal 0 10 11 25 26 50 > 50 (cwt/a) ------------------------------- P2O5 to Apply (lb/a) ---------------------------------- 1

400-500 150 100 50 25 > 500 175 125 75 25 1 ppm x 2 = lb/a Application of approximately 20 lb P2O5/A will increase soil test P level by 1 lb/a. Phosphorus Placement for Maximum Plant Uptake Phosphorus barely moves in the soil, and therefore it needs to be incorporated in the soil such that it will facilitate crop uptake. Phosphorus is not readily leached, but can be lost through runoff, where the soil is prone to erosion. A rule of thumb in P placement is to get the fertilizer close to the seed or plant roots. Broadcasting and working the P fertilizer into the top six inches of soil pre-plant or banding the fertilizer two inches below and two inches to both sides of the seed tuber at planting is ideal. Banding gives the highest efficiency in P fixing soils. Fertilization rate can be reduced by 30% by banding compared to broadcasting if soil tests show low in P concentration. Broadcasting or banding fertilizers containing ammonium can increase P availability to the plant by reducing soil ph. For full season P availability, it is important to raise the soil test P concentration in the root zone to adequate levels by broadcasting P to provide the entire root system with ready access to available soil P. fertilizers such as ammonium polyphosphate (10-34-0) and dry fertilizers such as monoammonium phosphate (11-52-0) are equally effective P sources for potatoes. In-Season P Management Phosphorus application through the sprinkler can be done to correct P deficiencies during the growing season, but this method can be effective only when the roots are about two inches near the surface, since the applied P will not move more than two inches into the soil. Petiole P concentration usually respond about 10 to 14 days after P application. Therefore P through the sprinkler system should be applied prior to any development of P deficiencies. Petiole Phosphorus Concentration For a good indication of adequate P concentration in the plant, the total P concentration in the fourth petiole from the growing point should be maintained above 0.22%. Petiole sampling for P should begin shortly after tuber initiation and continue at weekly intervals through the tuber bulking phase. Petiole P concentration of 0.17% is considered low, 0.17 0.22% is marginal, and greater than 0.22% is sufficient. CASE STUDY Title: Response of Potato to Phosphorus Application Rate, Timing, and form of Application in the San Luis Valley Experimental Procedure 2

The study was conducted at the San Luis Valley Research Center, Colorado State University. Selected soil chemical properties of the experimental site before potato planting are shown in Table 2. A factorial arrangement of P application rate (100, 150, 200 lb-p2o5/a), time of P application (100% pre-plant; 50% pre-plant and 50% at hilling;), and form of P application (liquid or dry application at hilling), were applied in a randomized complete block design. The treatments are summarized in Table 3. Each treatment was replicated three times. Seed tubers (2.5 to 3.0 oz seed wt.) were planted at a spacing of 11 inches within rows at 34 inches row spacing. Compound fertilizer 75-50-50-1 (N-K-S-Zn), was applied pre-plant. The remaining 100 lb N was applied as Urea Ammonium nitrate in three split application between July 9 and 30. Table 2 Selected soil chemical characteristics before planting Nitrate Nitrogen P K Zn Fe Mn Cu ppm 7.5 17.1 196.5 2.6 10.8 4.9 2.3 Petiole samples were collected from the fourth leaf beginning from the growing point between July 7 and August 4. Petioles were dried in a 60 o C oven and fine ground. Ground tissue was sent to the Colorado State University plant analysis lab for petiole P analysis. Tubers harvested from each plot were weighed to record total field yield. Tubers from each plot were graded for external and internal defects (Growth cracks, knobs, misshapes, hollow heart and brown center). Tubers were separated into various size distribution groups based on weight. Ten large (10-16 oz) tubers were taken for hollow heart evaluation. Tuber specific gravity was measured using the weight-in-air/weight-in-water method. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance, Waller-Duncan mean separation, and orthogonal contrasts using SAS software. Table 3 Phosphorus application treatments. Treatment Treat. # --- Fertilizer phosphorus applied (lb-p2o5/ac)-- (lb-p2o5/ac) used Pre-plant At Hilling Total Form of Fertilizer Used 100 1 100 0 100 150 2 150 0 150 200 3 200 0 200 4 50 50 100 100 (1/2 + 1/2) 5 75 75 150 150 (1/2 + 1/2) 3

100(1/2+1/4+1/4) 1 150(1/2+1/4+1/4) 1 6 100 100 200 200 (1/2 + 1/2) 25 + 25 + Dry 7 50 100 37.5 + 37.5 + Dry 8 75 150 9 100 200 200(1/2+1/4+1/4)1 50 + 50 + Dry 1 Half of required fertilizer applied as liquid pre-plant, 1/4 applied as liquid and 1/4 as dry fertilizer at hilling Tuber Yield and Tuber Size Distribution Results and Discussion Phosphorus application rate, timing, and form of application did not generally influence total tuber yield, except treatment 7 [100 (1/2+1/4+1/4)] which produced less tubers. Phosphorus management, however, influenced tuber size distribution (fig. 1 to 5). Treatment 1 and 9 (100 and 100+50+50 lb-p2o5/ac) produced fewer culls (fig 2) and more marketable size tubers (fig. 3 and 4), when compared to the other treatments. This observation indicates that application of 100 lb-p2o5/ac pre-plant with soil test of 17.1 ppm is more economical for maximum tuber yield. Treatment 1 (application of 100 lb-p2o5/ac), produced a total yield of 409 cwt/acre and 67% (276 cwt/a) of marketable tuber (4-16 oz) yield (fig 1 and 3). Phosphorus management did not influence tuber specific gravity in this study (data not shown). Fig 1 Effect of P management on total tuber yield of Russet Potato. Fig 2 Effect of P management on the yield of < 4 oz tubers 4

Fig 3 Effect of P management on marketable tuber yield of Russet Potato Fig 4 Effect of P management on yield of large marketable size tubers Legend of Treatments (lb P2O5/A) 1 = 100; 2 = 150; 3 = 200; 4 = 100 (1/2 + 1/2); 5 = 150 (1/2 + 1/2); 6 = 200 (1/2 + 1/2); 7 = 100 (1/2 + 1/4 + 1/4); 8 = 150 (1/2 + 1/4 + 1/4); 9 = 200 (1/2 + 1/4 + 1/4) Tuber Number (Tuber Set) Phosphorus management influenced the number of tubers produced per plant (fig 5). Treatments 2, 4, 7, and 9, produced the largest number of tubers (12) per plant, while treatment 1 produced the least (8) tubers per plant. The eight tubers per plant produced did compensate for higher yield by producing bigger tubers (fig 3 and 4). Legend of Treatments (lb P2O5/A) 1 = 100; 2 = 150; 3 = 200; 4 = 100 (1/2 + 1/2); 5 = 150 (1/2 + 1/2); 6 = 200 (1/2 + 1/2); 7 = 100 (1/2 + 1/4 + 1/4); 8 = 150 (1/2 + 1/4 + 1/4); 9 = 200 (1/2 + 1/4 + 1/4) Fig 5 Effect of P management on tuber number of Russet potato 5

Petiole P Concentration Petiole P concentration was measured at 53, 60, 73, and 80 days after planting (DAP) ( fig 6). Petiole P concentration decreased in all treatments from 53 to 80 DAP. Petiole P concentration increased as P application rate increased. Petiole P concentration did not fall below 0.20% in all treatments. The optimum petiole P concentration for optimum tuber yield were observed to be, 0.46, 0.33, 0.23, and 0.21%, at 53,60, 73, and 80 DAP, respectively, when 100 lb P2O5/A was applied pre-plant. Phosphorus management practices that produced petiole P concentration above 0.5, 0.4, 0.3, and 0.28%, during the same sampling dates as the optimum concentration, produced fewer marketable tuber yield. Legend of Treatments (lb P2O5/A) 1 = 100; 2 = 150; 3 = 200; 4 = 100 (1/2 + 1/2); 5 = 150 (1/2 + 1/2); 6 = 200 (1/2 + 1/2); 7 = 100 (1/2 + 1/4 + 1/4); 8 = 150 (1/2 + 1/4 + 1/4); 9 = 200 (1/2 + 1/4 + 1/4) Fig 6 Effect of P management on petiole P concentration during the growing season Summary and Conclusion The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of P application rate, application timing, and form of P application on tuber yield, tuber size distribution, quality, and petiole P concentration in Russet Potato. With soil test P of 17.1 ppm at pre-plant, an application of P fertilizer at the rate of 100 lb-p2o5/a pre-plant produced the maximum marketable tuber yield. The relatively low percentage (68%) of marketable tuber yield observed in this study was due to the narrow in-row seed spacing of 11 inches. Widening the in-row seed spacing to 12 inches, can increase the percentage of marketable size tubers. Results of this study indicate that for maximum tuber yield, petiole P levels should not fall below 0.22% during tuber bulking, and should not go above 0.3% during the same period. Petiole P concentration should not go above 0.5% during the early stages of tuber formation. Optimum petiole P concentration during the growing season should be 0.46, 0.33, 0.23, and 0.21%, at 53, 60, 73, and 80 days after planting, respectively, to obtain maximum marketable tuber yield. 6