Draft Gaviota Coast Plan Chapter 7: Visual Resources

Similar documents
4.1 AESTHETICS/VISUAL RESOURCES

-MENDOCINO COUNTY PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES- DIVISION II OF TITLE 20--COASTAL ZONING CODE

Site Design (Table 2) Fact Sheet & Focus Questions:

Nob Hill Pipeline Improvements Project EIR

5.1 AESTHETICS AND VISUAL RESOURCES Physical Setting

HALF MOON BAY LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM. d), JOHN M. St>NGER ASSOCIATES INC S.F.' CA EIOO VISUAL RESOURCES OVERLAY.

CHAPTER 10 AESTHETICS

5.11 AESTHETICS ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING

6.8 SCENIC HIGHWAYS Introduction

PRIVATE PLAN CHANGE REQUEST REZONING OF LAND AT 49, 57 AND 71 MILL ROAD FROM RURAL 3 ZONE TO MAIN RESIDENTIAL ZONE. Amendments to:

City of Lafayette Study Session Staff Report Design Review Commission

6.3 VISUAL RESOURCES. Landscape Character

COMMUNITY DESIGN. GOAL: Create livable and attractive communities. Intent

Infill Residential Design Guidelines

VISUAL QUALITY POLICIES

SENSITIVE LANDS OVERLAY

MEMORANDUM. A. Small Scale Campgrounds Recreational Vehicle (RV) Size Limits

City of Lafayette Study Session Staff Report Design Review Commission

IV. Development in the Rural Overlay District

COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES MANUAL

5. Environmental Analysis

File No (Continued)

3.1 AESTHETICS Background and Methodology

INTRODUCTION. 1.1 What is a General Plan? 1.2 Requirements for a General Plan. 1.3 Introduction to Monterey County

RESOLUTION NO

City of Lafayette Staff Report

County of Loudoun. Department of Planning MEMORANDUM. SUBJECT: ZMOD , Dulles North Business Park Comprehensive Sign Plan, 2 nd Referral

Venice Pumping Plant Dual Force Main Project Draft EIR

IV.B. VISUAL RESOURCES

3.10 LAND USE SETTING PROJECT SITE EXISTING LAND USE DESIGNATIONS AND ZONING. General Plan Land Use Designations.

Highway Oriented Commercial Development Criteria

City of San Ramon. Zoning Ordinance. Adopted: October 27, Latest Revisions Effective: March 28, 2018

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City of Kalama has many areas of timberland and open areas inside its City limits adjacent to residential areas;

Covenant Design Review Committee Supplemental Design Criteria

CHAPTER FIVE COMMUNITY DESIGN

APPENDIX C: HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (prev. Ordinance #2008-1)

I511. Hatfields Precinct

A. General Plan: Land Use, Growth Management and the Built Environment Element. d. Use visually unobtrusive building materials.

CHAPTER 13 DESIGN GUIDELINES

APPENDIX C. Architectural and Environmental Design Standards. Environmentally sensitive areas should be protected.

MORAGA HILLSIDES AND RIDGELINES PROJECT

PARK CITY MUNICIPAL CODE TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE 15 LAND MANAGEMENT CODE - CHAPTER 2.21

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report for the Nicholas Appeal of the Stewart Single Family Dwelling

Protecting Scenic Views

5.1.1 The streetscape along US Highway 64 (Brevard Road); and, The built environment within new residential developments; and,

3. VISION AND GOALS. Vision Statement. Goals, Objectives and Policies

STAFF REPORT FOR STANDARD COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT #CDP FEBRUARY 26, 2015 CPA - 1 PO BOX 238 APTOS, CA 94001

URBAN DESIGN GOALS / POLICIES / MEASURES

CITY OF PUYALLUP. Background. Development Services

Example Codes. City of Brentwood, Tennessee Brentwood Hillside Protection Overlay District Summary

3.2 AESTHETICS/VISUAL QUALITY

Zoning Ordinance Chapter 10

Fact Sheet Regulating Oceanfront Accessory Structures Updated June 10, 2013

3.7 Aesthetics. A. Setting. 1. Existing Views of the Quarry

I. STAFF POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS. The following RMP policy strategies are proposed by staff in support of a Scenic Resource Protection Program:

4.1 AESTHETICS AND VISUAL QUALITY

CHAPTER 10-D GREATER MONTEREY PENINSULA AREA PLAN

RZC Public View Corridors and Gateways

CHAPTER 10-D GREATER MONTEREY PENINSULA AREA PLAN

Authority of the General Plan

SECTION UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE SECTION Part 1 Ordinance. ARTICLE 1 Zoning Districts

Scenic Resources Revised 7/19/2011

Section 3.16 Visual Quality

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report for McDonough Appeal of Bauman Single Family Dwelling and Landscaping

Design Element Amended: CC Resolution CC Resolution Background D-1

4.1 AESTHETICS Setting

2011 ASLA Design Awards

Glenn Highway MP DSR. Landscape Narrative

4. INDUSTRIAL 53 CASTLE ROCK DESIGN

36.1. PURPOSE APPLICABILITY DESIGN REVIEW GUIDELINES

4.8 Landform Alteration and Aesthetics

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS

3.1 AESTHETICS AND VISUAL RESOURCES

Galiuro Drilling EA Scenery Debby Kriegel 12/9/16

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Coastal Zone Staff Report for Highway 101: Carpinteria to Santa Barbara Local Coastal Program Amendment

MASTER PLAN. 201 Planning Concepts. Chapter 2

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT DEEP VALLEY DRIVE AND INDIAN PEAK ROAD MIXED-USE RESIDENTIAL PROJECT

Chapter 3: Office & Office Mixed-Use Project Types

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT SEPTEMBER 1, 2016

Chapter SAR, SENSITIVE AREA RESORT ZONE

4.1 AESTHETICS EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ALAMITOS BAY MARINA REHABILITATION PROJECT CITY OF LONG BEACH

Residential Design Guidelines

OCEAN BOULEVARD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (PD-5)

Workshop Summary: Neighborhood Character

Municipal Comprehensive and Open Space Plans

Baseline Hillside Project Kick-Off Meetings. February 2009

6.1 Aesthetics Introduction

Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures

Public Review Draft Oceanside Subarea Habitat Conservation Plan/ Natural Communities Conservation Plan

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation December 13, 2007 COASTAL TRAIL AT LAND S END. File No Project Manager: Joan Cardellino

EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS A. AESTHETICS

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT February 5, 2016

BUFFERS, TREE PROTECTION AND LANDSCAPING. Sec Purpose and Intent.

Sherman Pass Project Post-Fire Treatment Scenery Report Barbara Jackson, Landscape Architect, 3/30/2016

3.1 Aesthetics, Light, and Glare

ARTICLE IV: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 404 MASTER PLANNING

I611. Swanson North Precinct

Woodland Conservation and the Master Plan

II. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

Transcription:

Draft Gaviota Coast Plan Chapter 7: Visual Resources 11/28/2012 Long Range Planning Division Planning and Development Department County of Santa Barbara

Page Intentionally Blank Cover Photo: Gaviota Morning in Tajiguas by Mark Bright 7-2

Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION...x 2.0 BACKGROUND AND SETTING...x 3.0 LAND USE......x 4.0 AGRICULTURE...x 5.0 NATURAL RESOURCES...x 6.0 PUBLIC TRAILS AND RECREATION.....x 7.0 VISUAL RESOURCES............x 8.0 TRANSPORTATION, ENERGY, AND INFRASTRUCTURE....... x 9.0 REFERENCES......x 7-3

Page Intentionally Blank 7-4

Chapter 7: Visual and Aesthetic Resources Physical Setting The rural character of the Gaviota Coast is one of a working agricultural landscape nestled between the mountains and the sea, a unique natural setting. Visually, the landscape of the Gaviota Coast is one of open vistas of chaparral-covered sandstone mountains, numerous wooded canyons, grasslands, coastal bluffs narrow sandy beaches, and the Pacific Ocean bounded by the Channel Islands. The complexity of this natural landscape blended with grazing lands and orchards creates a dramatic environment with rural character. Agriculture, from grazing to row crops and orchards, has been historically prominent and continues to define the character of the coast. The rugged mountains provide a striking backdrop to the coastal terrace and Santa Barbara Channel with the views of the mountains and ocean generally unimpeded and unfragmented. The Gaviota Coast is lightly inhabited, visible residential structures are few and of modest size, and agricultural structures are generally simple and functional. There are three industrial developments on the coast with the most visible being the PXP Point Arguello. The area is bisected by the transportation corridor of Highway 101 and the railroad. However, the visual character of the Gaviota Coast is relatively undisturbed by these urban elements; the built environment is largely subordinate to the scenic natural features and pastoral qualities of the Gaviota Coast. Regulatory Setting The Land Use Element and Open Space Element of the County Comprehensive Plan include policies to protect and enhance visual resources. The Land Use Element Hillside and Watershed Protection Policies, as well as the Hillside and Ridgeline Protection Ordinance (Ordinance 3714), regulate development on slopes to minimize grading, disruption of natural vegetation, and erosion. Visual Resource Policies of the Land Use Element include measures to ensure compatibility of structures with the surrounding natural environment and/or existing community through structural design review and landscaping requirements, limitations on signs which disrupt public views (also regulated by the Land Use & Development Code), and requirements for undergrounding new utilities. The Open Space Element identifies the County's scenic beauty as a principal factor in the attraction of residents and visitors, evaluates the visual quality of natural resources and travel corridors, and emphasizes the importance of urban perimeters. The Open Space Element s scenic values model includes intensity, design, and arrangement of development, preservation of natural features, and variety in landscaping as criteria for the protection of visual resources. The segment of U.S. Highway 101 through the Gaviota Coast Plan area is also eligible for designation as a California Scenic Highway. The Coastal Act mandates that scenic and visual qualities of the coast shall be considered and protected as a resource of public importance. In particular, views to and along the coast shall be protected. New development shall be visually compatible with the character of surrounding areas. LCP policies ensure that new structures are compatible with the height, scale, and design of existing buildings. Significant views to and along the coast continue to be protected by LCP policies, and the preservation of visually prominent ridgelines is also addressed. The LCP protects the existing character of the Coastal Zone, while still accommodating compatible new development. 7-5

<<Insert Critical Viewshed Map>>

Planning Issues Santa Barbara County has a set of policies designed to minimize direct visual impacts from development, in addition to protecting against the degradation of existing broader scenic vistas from public viewing places. The key goals of the countywide rural visual policies are for development to: 1) be subordinate to the natural surroundings, 2) limit disturbance to the natural terrain, and 3) not intrude into the skyline. In general, development is required to blend into the surroundings as much as possible. It should be noted that this countywide rural visual policy approach does not require development to be hidden or fully screened. The key role of the adopted visual and aesthetic resources policies is to ensure the retention of the vital rural character of the coast as experienced visually by the public. The policies in this plan augment the existing countywide regulations to protect the unique character of the Gaviota Coast. Given the above discussion, it must also be stated that there are areas where, due to the potential for impairment of particularly scenic vistas, development is more severely restricted. The most prominent example of this is the coastal view corridor along Highway 101 and the railroad tracks from Goleta to the Gaviota Tunnel. This corridor provides ocean and inland public views of the highest quality in the region. Moreover, much of this view corridor is highly susceptible to visual degradation due to broad near-field views largely devoid of major stands of trees or intervening topographical breaks. A higher standard of review for development in this area is therefore warranted. There may be other individual sites where the potential spoilage of important vistas (e.g. rock formations) would also entail appropriate restrictions on proposed development. Another threat to the aesthetic values of the Gaviota Coast is the potential of the encroachment of significant additional night lighting associated with development and other infrastructure such as roads and entry kiosks. A part of the rural character of the Gaviota Coast is the relative darkness of the night sky. All proposed residential development and larger scale agricultural development in the Gaviota Coast Plan Area will be subject to the Outdoor Lighting Ordinance and undergo the Design Review process of the CBAR. In addition to making qualified judgments to ensure that proposed development is consistent with visual resources policy, the CBAR reviews the integrity of all aspects of development design including site layout, architecture, color, landscaping, etc. Site Design Hierarchy A systematic hierarchy of site design and treatment issues has been developed to ensure a consistent approach to achieve the most satisfactory implementation of visual resources protection on the Gaviota Coast. Site selection is the primary and most important decision in meeting the visual resources policies for new development. This is the one design component that, when properly executed, reveals the optimum scope and treatments for a successful development from a visual policy perspective. Ideal site selection, for example, minimizes required grading, which necessitates less scarring and restorative plantings to the landscape, and so on. Hence, an ideal development site minimizes the need for landform alterations and potentially the need for screening plantings and other treatments to feign or give the illusion of subordination to the natural setting. Granted, many properties lack such an ideal development site, and may require screening landscaping, grading, or other treatments to avoid or lessen visual impacts. Of course, there are some tensions between the various policies which, for 7-7

example, may require development to minimize visibility at the expense of increasing grading to lower finish floor elevations. I. Site Selection a. Visibility b. Topography c. Accessibility d. Resource Sensitivity e. Fire Protection II. Architecture a. Design b. Mass, Bulk, and Scale b. Materials/Details c. Colors III. Grading a. Excavation b. Stepped Foundations/Basements c. Retaining Walls d. Berming IV. Landscape a. Visual Softening/Screening; native plants, then non-native. The following core planning tools have been adopted to address the visual planning issues unique to Gaviota and to enhance the visual quality of the Plan Area over the long-term: Critical Viewshed Corridor Overlay The near-field views on the south and portions of the north of Highway 101 and the railroad tracks are visually critical and warrant additional protection from the impacts of development. Therefore a Critical Viewshed Corridor Overlay has been created and will be implemented through the Inland and Coastal Zoning Ordinances (see the attached map). Among other requirements, development under the overlay is required to be fully screened according to the site design hierarchy. Under this overlay, development would be required to be not visible from any public viewing place. This is a higher standard for 7-8

development to meet, whereas all other areas require that development only be visually subordinate to the surroundings. Design Control Overlay To ensure protection of the aesthetic resources of the Gaviota Coast, the policies of the Design Control Overlay are applied to all of the Planning Area. Additional polices apply within the area of the Critical Viewshed Overlay. The Design Control Overlay is an existing tool in the Inland and Coastal Zoning Ordinances with the intent to foster well sited and designed developments that protect public scenic qualities. A key provision of the overlay is the requirement for design review by the Board of Architectural Review for development on the Gaviota Coast. Scenic Highway Corridor/Scenic Corridor Both the Scenic Highway Corridor and the Scenic Corridor areas highlight areas of potential scenic value along public travelways without applying additional specific policy requirements. Rather, they highlight these areas for visual issues related to potential development. To formalize the recognition of the scenic values from Highway 101, an application for scenic highway status for Highway 101 is included as an item for future action. Outdoor Lighting Ordinance Due to its rural character, low intensity of development, and its distance from intensely illuminated urban areas, the Gaviota Coast retains an invaluable nighttime visual resource. The proposed Gaviota Coast Outdoor Lighting ordinance establishes development standards for the Plan Area intended to reduce the effects of excessive and inefficient lighting on the environment, visual resources, and neighboring properties. Policies and Implementation a. Visual Resources Goal GOAL VIS-1: To protect and enhance the rural, scenic, and visual qualities of the Gaviota Coast. b. Visual Resource Policies 1. Planning Area-Wide Policies Policy VIS-1 Visual Compatibility: The height, scale, and design of structures shall be compatible with the character of the surrounding natural environment (Incorporated from Land Use Element Visual Resources Policy No. 2, p. 82). Policy VIS-2 Visually Subordinate Development: Development shall be visually subordinate as seen from public viewing places. Visual subordinance shall be achieved through the following measures, in order of priority: 1) siting utilizing natural landform screening, 2) siting utilizing existing vegetative screening (native first, then non-native), and 3) application of other treatments (design, color, materials, grading, landscaping, etc.) (Adapted from Land Use Element Visual Resources Policy No. 3, p. 82). Policy VIS-3 Skyline Intrusion: Development shall be sited so as not to intrude into the skyline as seen from public viewing places with the naked eye (i.e. without the use of magnification such as binoculars, telescope, etc.) (Adapted from Land Use Element Visual Resources Policy No. 2, p. 82). 7-9

Policy VIS-4 Ridgeline Development: Development shall be discouraged from locating on ridgelines (Adapted from Ridgeline and Hillside Development Guidelines). Policy VIS-5 Lighting: The night sky and surrounding land uses shall be protected from excessive and unnecessary light associated with development (04/27/11 GavPAC Action). Policy VIS-6 Design Review: All plans for new or altered structures within the Gaviota Coast Planning Area shall be reviewed and considered for approval by the County Board of Architectural Review. Policy VIS-7 Artificial Berms: Artificial berms that unnaturally modify slopes so as to be visually evident shall be discouraged. Policy VIS-8 Walls and Fencing: Walls and fencing shall not be visually dominant or disruptive in relation to their surroundings. Highly reflective or bright materials or colors shall not be permitted, and use of unfinished wood allowed to weather shall be encouraged. Policy VIS-9 Water Tanks: In hillside areas where water tanks are required for structural fire-fighting purposes, tanks shall be designed to blend in with natural land forms and background colors and textures, and minimize intrusion into the public viewshed. Policy VIS-10 Alternative Energy Development: Alternative energy development (e.g., wind, solar, and associated infrastructure) shall demonstrate consistency with the visual resources policies of the Gaviota Coast Plan (04/27/11 GavPAC Action). Policy VIS-11 Utility Pole Removal: The community shall encourage Caltrans and the railroad to remove old, unused utility poles from the transportation corridor to enhance the scenic qualities of the coastline (Gaviota Coast Planning Visual Resources Worksheet, VIS-8). 2. Critical Viewshed Corridor Policies These policies supplement the Planning Area-Wide Policies. Policy VIS-12 Critical Viewshed Corridor: Protection of the ocean and mountain views of the Gaviota Coast from Highway 101 is critically important. Therefore, a Critical Viewshed Corridor Overlay, providing more protective viewshed policies for development within the overlay, is designated for the Gaviota Coast (04/27/11 GavPAC Action). Policy VIS-13 Fully Screened Development: Development within the Critical Viewshed Corridor shall be fully screened to the maximum extent feasible as seen from public viewing places. Full screening shall be achieved to the maximum extent feasible through the following measures, in order of priority: 1) siting utilizing natural landform screening, 2) siting utilizing existing vegetative screening (native first, then non-native), and 3) application of other treatments (design, color, materials, grading, landscaping, etc.) (04/27/11 GavPAC Action). Policy VIS-14 Landscaping: Non-agricultural and non-native landscaping, when mature, shall not obstruct public mountain or ocean views (04/27/11 GavPAC Action). 7-10

Policy VIS-15 Ocean Views: Development shall be sited and designed to preserve unobstructed broad views of the ocean from Highway 101, and shall be clustered to the maximum extent feasible (Adapted from Coastal Land Use Plan Policy 4-9, page 43). Policy VIS-16 Building Height: Building height south of Highway 101 shall not exceed one story or 15 feet above average existing grade, unless an increase in height would facilitate clustering of development and result in greater view protection, or a height in excess of 15 feet would not impact public views to the ocean. For properties within unobstructed broad views of the ocean, development shall be designed so that exposed structural elevations are at an appropriately proportioned mass and scale to the unobstructed broad views of the ocean (Adapted from Coastal Land Use Plan Policy 4-11, page 4-11). c. Visual Resources Implementing Actions Action VIS-1 Design Guidelines: The County shall work with the community to develop and adopt Gaviota Coast design guidelines, including signage and lighting matters, which may be used by P&D and the Board of Architectural Review in approving future development. Action VIS-2 Alternative Energy Development: As the area of alternative energy development is dynamically evolving, the County shall consider developing or revising policies as needed to facilitate community needs consistent with protecting visual resources (04/27/11 GavPAC Action). Action VIS-3 State Scenic Highway Designation: The County shall apply to Caltrans for a scenic highway designation for Highway 101 from the Goleta City boundary to Highway 1 (04/27/11 GavPAC Action). d. Visual Resources Development Standards (Development Standards will be implemented in the Land Use Development Code Section XX and the Coastal Zoning Ordinance Section XX but are included here for review and discussion) DevStd VIS-1: Fuel Management Zone Buffers: Structures shall be sited and designed to minimize the need for vegetation clearance for fuel management zone buffers. Where feasible, necessary roads and driveways shall be incorporated into fuel management zone buffers (Gaviota Coast Planning Visual Resources Worksheet, VIS-4). DevStd VIS-2: Fire Department Standards: The County shall work with the Santa Barbara County Fire Department to consider revised standards to minimize excessive road/driveway construction and reduce or redesign fuel management zone buffers to minimize the removal of natural vegetation and related visual impacts (Gaviota Coast Planning Visual Resources Worksheet, VIS-4). e. Definitions (Definitions will ultimately reside in the Land Use Development Code Section XX and the Coastal Zoning Ordinance Section XX but are included here for review and discussion) Definition-Visually Subordinate: The relative visibility of development, where that development is not visibly evident in the surrounding landscape as viewed from a public viewing place. As opposed to development that is fully screened, development that is visually subordinate may be partially visible. It is not visually dominant or disruptive in relation to its surroundings. Definition-Visually Evident: Visible and dominant or disruptive in relation to its surroundings. 7-11

Definition-Fully Screened: Not visible from any public viewing place. f. Other Ordinance Amendments (These ordinance amendments will be implemented in the Land Use Development Code Section XX and the Coastal Zoning Ordinance Section XX but is included here for review and discussion) Single agricultural structures less than 10,000 square feet in area, or cumulative agricultural structural development within a single development envelope less than 15,000 square feet in area are exempted from design review. (Purpose and Intent statements will be written and will ultimately reside in the Land Use Development Code Section XX and the Coastal Zoning Ordinance Section XX) 7-12