Technical Committee on Incinerators and Waste Handling Systems

Technical Committee on Incinerators and Waste Handling Systems Date: April 27, 2017 To: From: Technical Committee on Incinerators and Waste Handling Systems Eric Nette, Staff Liaison/Engineer Re: Agenda Package NFPA 82 First Draft Meeting May 10-11, 2017 (F2018) Enclosed is the agenda package for the Wednesday and Thursday, May 10-11, 2017 NFPA 82 First Draft Meeting. Please ensure that you have reviewed the public input and the other agenda items in advance to prepare for discussion. The agenda (which includes the public inputs) will be posted on the document information pages to www.nfpa.org/82next Some items to have available during the meeting include: Agenda package with public input A copy of NFPA 82 (visit the NFPA 82 Document information pages for your free committee copy) Any previous copies of the technical committees standard A laptop Optional items that are sometimes useful include: Review of NFPA s Process, www.nfpa.org/regs If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to reach me at (617) 984-7434 or by e-mail at enette@nfpa.org. I look forward to our meeting to begin the revision cycle! Page 1 of 45

NFPA 82 F2018 First Draft Meeting May 10-11, 2017 Teleconference 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. (Eastern Time Zone) To Join the Meeting: http://nfpa.adobeconnect.com/nette/ US (Toll Free): 1-866-398-2885 Participant Code: 691847 1. Meeting opening, introduction and attendance 2. Approval of Second Draft Meeting Minutes of April 3, 2013 (Attachment A. April 3, 2013 Meeting Minutes). 3. Chair's remarks, Brian Polk 4. Staff Liaison update: a. F2018 Schedule (Attachment B. F2018 Revision Cycle) b. Committee Membership Update (Attachment C. ICN-AAA Membership) c. Standards Process Review (Attachment D. NFPA Process Quick Reference Guide) 5. Old/New Business a. Public Input for NFPA 82 (Attachment E. NFPA 82 - F2018 Public Input) and development of First Revisions 6. Other business 7. Date/Location of Next Meeting. (Second Draft Meeting between December 1, 2018 and May 17, 2018) 8. Adjournment (May 11) Page 2 of 45

Attachment A: April 3, 2013 Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 45

Technical Committee on Incinerators and Waste Handling Systems Date: April 17, 2013 To: Technical Committee on Incinerators and Waste Handling Systems From: Derek Duval, Staff Liaison/Fire Protection Engineer Re: NFPA 82 Second Draft Meeting Minutes April 2013 Enclosed are the meeting minutes from the April 3, 2013 NFPA 82 Second Draft meeting in Quincy, MA. Please feel free to bring any substantive incorrect items to my attention. The next meeting will be held via teleconference June 24, 2013. Details will follow as they become available. The Committee actions will be balloted before June 16, 2013. The Second Draft Report will be posted no later than July 19, 2013. Comments for must be submitted no later than May 3, 2013. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to reach me at (617) 984-7434 or by e-mail at dduval@nfpa.org. Page 4 of 45

ICN-AAA Page 2 Second Draft Minutes, NFPA 82 April 2013 Technical Committee on Incinerators and Waste Handling Systems Minutes of Meeting NFPA Headquaters 1 Batterymarch Park Quincy, MA 02169-7471 April 3, 2013 I. Attendance: Principal Members/Staff: Brian Polk, Chair, North Carolina Division of Waste Management, NC Derek Duval, NFPA, MA Chad Beebe, American Society for Healthcare, WA (via telephone) Michael Bracken, Wilkinson Hi-Rise, LLC, FL (via telephone) Sharon Gilyeat, Koffel Associates, Inc, MD Alternate Members and Guests: Joanne Goyette, NFPA, MA II. Meeting Minutes: 1. Call to order. The meeting was called to order at 8:08 a.m. on April 3, 2013. The Chair, Brian Polk, welcomed the Technical Committee (TC) members and guests to the meeting. 2. Self-Introductions. The TC members and guests introduced themselves and identified their affiliations. 3. Approval of the Minutes. The minutes of the October 2010 Report of Comments (ROC) meeting were approved as written. 4. Staff Liaison Report. The staff liaison made a brief presentation on NFPA policies and procedures, the new standards process, reviewed the document revision timeline (Attachment A, F2013 Revision Cycle), and updated the TC on membership changes. 5. New Business: A. NFPA 82. The Committee reviewed and responded all the public comments (7). The Committee developed Second Revisions. The public comments, second revisions and committee statements will be posted in the Second Revision Report and Draft to be posted no later than July 19, 2013. The Second Draft Report and Draft will be available via www.nfpa.org/82. Page 5 of 45

ICN-AAA Page 3 Second Draft Minutes, NFPA 82 April 2013 6. Other Business. A. Michael Bracken Develop requirements for waste compactors located indoors, but has access from a ground floor for the next revision. B. Chad Beebe Review the NFPA 80 requirements for similarities and conflicts for the TC to review. 7. Next Meeting. The next meeting will be a conference call to discuss and review the NFPA 80 requirements in relation to NFPA 82. 8. Adjournment. The meeting was adjourned at 12:09 p.m. April 3, 2013. Page 6 of 45

ICN-AAA Page 4 Second Draft Minutes, NFPA 82 April 2013 ATTACHMENT A NFPA 82 Revision Cycle Fall 2014 NFPA 82, Revision Cycle F2013 Important Dates for the Cycle: Posting of Second Draft July 19, 2013 Notice of Intent to Make a Motion (NITMAM) August 23, 2013 Issuance of Consent Standard November 12, 2013 NFPA Annual Meeting with CAMs (Certified Amending Motions) June 9-12, 2014 Issuance of Standard with CAMs August 14, 2014 Page 7 of 45

Attachment B: F2018 Revision Cycle Page 8 of 45

NFPA http://www.nfpa.org/codes-and-standards/all-codes-and-standards/list-of-codes-and-standa... Page 1 of 1 4/26/2017 Fall 2018 Revision Cycle Process Stage Process Step Dates for TC Public Input Stage (First Draft) Dates for TC with CC Public Input Closing Date* 1/05/2017 1/05/2017 Final Date for TC First Draft Meeting 6/15/2017 3/16/2017 Posting of First Draft and TC Ballot 8/03/2017 4/27/2017 Final date for Receipt of TC First Draft ballot 8/24/2017 5/18/2017 Final date for Receipt of TC First Draft ballot recirc 8/31/2017 5/25/2017 Posting of First Draft for CC Meeting 6/01/2017 Final date for CC First Draft Meeting 7/13/2017 Posting of First Draft and CC Ballot 8/03/2017 Final date for Receipt of CC First Draft ballot 8/24/2017 Final date for Receipt of CC First Draft ballot recirc 8/31/2017 Post First Draft Report for Public Comment 9/07/2017 9/07/2017 Comment Stage (Second Draft) Tech Session Preparation (& Issuance) Public Comment Closing Date* 11/16/2017 11/16/2017 Notice Published on Consent Standards (Standards that received no Comments) Note: Date varies and determined via TC ballot. Appeal Closing Date for Consent Standards (Standards that received no Comments) Final date for TC Second Draft Meeting 5/17/2018 2/08/2018 Posting of Second Draft and TC Ballot 6/28/2018 3/22/2018 Final date for Receipt of TC Second Draft ballot 7/19/2018 4/12/2018 Final date for receipt of TC Second Draft ballot recirc 7/26/2018 4/19/2018 Posting of Second Draft for CC Meeting 4/26/2018 Final date for CC Second Draft Meeting 6/07/2018 Posting of Second Draft for CC Ballot 6/28/2018 Final date for Receipt of CC Second Draft ballot 7/19/2018 Final date for Receipt of CC Second Draft ballot recirc 7/26/2018 Post Second Draft Report for NITMAM Review 8/02/2018 8/02/2018 Notice of Intent to Make a Motion (NITMAM) Closing Date 8/30/2018 8/30/2018 Posting of Certified Amending Motions (CAMs) and Consent Standards 10/11/2018 10/11/2018 Appeal Closing Date for Consent Standards 10/26/2018 10/26/2018 SC Issuance Date for Consent Standards 11/05/2018 11/05/2018 Tech Session Association Meeting for Standards with CAMs 6/20/2019 6/20/2019 Appeals and Issuance Appeal Closing Date for Standards with CAMs 7/10/2019 7/10/2019 SC Issuance Date for Standards with CAMs 8/07/2019 8/07/2019 TC = Technical Committee or Panel CC = Correlating Committee As of 1/27/2017 Page 9 of 45

NFPA 82 Revision Cycle KEY DATES Fall 2018 NFPA 82 F2018 [ICN-AAA] Important Dates For the Cycle: Public Input Closing January 5, 2017 (DONE) Posting of First Draft September 7, 2017 Public Comment Closing November 16, 2017 Posting of Second Draft August 2, 2018 Notice of Intent to Make Motion (NITMAM) August 30, 2018 Issuance of Consent Standard November 5, 2018 (published bit later) NFPA Annual Meeting with CAMs June 20, 2018 Issuance of Standard with CAMs August 7, 2019 (published bit later) Page 10 of 45

Attachment C: ICN-AAA Committee Membership Page 11 of 45

Address List No Phone Incinerators and Waste Handling Systems 04/26/2017 Eric Nette ICN-AAA Brian N. Polk Chair North Carolina Division of Waste Management 217 West Jones Street Raleigh, NC 27603 E 7/23/2008 ICN-AAA Chad E. Beebe Principal ASHE - AHA PO Box 5756 Lacey, WA 98509-5756 U 03/05/2012 ICN-AAA Hadi C. Boustani Principal CHUTES International 33 Industrial Park Drive Waldorf, MD 20602 IM 08/03/2016 ICN-AAA Michael F. Bracken Principal Wilkinson Hi-Rise, LLC 3001 Greene Street Hollywood, FL 33020 M 7/17/1998 ICN-AAA James R Buchanan Principal Buchanan Company Inc. 5772 Bolsa Avenue, Suite 120 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 IM 10/28/2014 ICN-AAA Sharon S. Gilyeat Principal Koffel Associates, Inc. 2015 Ayrsley Town Blvd. Suite 202 Charlotte, NC 28273 Alternate: Sarina L. Hart SE 4/28/2000 ICN-AAA Michael Luft Principal Van-Packer Company, Inc. 302 Mill Street PO Box 307 Buda, IL 61314-9539 M 12/08/2015 ICN-AAA James S. Peterkin Principal TLC Engineering Senior Fire Protection Engineer 18 Kline Drive Thornton, PA 19373 SE 08/03/2016 ICN-AAA Neil P. Wu Principal Exponent, Inc. 17000 Science Drive, Suite 200 Bowie, MD 20715-4427 SE 7/26/2007 ICN-AAA Sarina L. Hart Alternate Koffel Associates, Inc. 8815 Centre Park Drive, Suite 200 Columbia, MD 21045-2107 Principal: Sharon S. Gilyeat SE 12/08/2015 ICN-AAA Eric Nette Staff Liaison National Fire Protection Association 1 Batterymarch Park Quincy, MA 02169-7471 04/16/2014 ICN-AAA Page 12 of 45 1

Attachment D: NFPA Process Quick Reference Guide Page 13 of 45

New Process Quick Reference Guide For additional information on the Regulations visit: www.nfpa.org/regs There are only three actions a TC can take at the First Draft (ROP) meeting: 1. Resolve a Public Input (no change to the document) 2. Create a First Revision (change to the document) 3. Create Committee Input Resolve Public Input (no change to the document) TC must provide a response (Committee Statement/CS) to ALL Public Input (proposal). CS for not doing what is suggested Sample Motion: I make a motion to resolve PI#_ with the following committee statement. Approval by meeting vote (simple majority). Not subject to Ballot. Create a First Revision (change to the document) TC must create a First Revision (FR) for each change they wish to make to the document, either using Public Input for the basis of the change or not using a Public Input for the basis. One or more Public Input can be considered for the FR. All Public Input requires a response TC can use a Public Input for basis i. Sample Motion: I make a motion to revise section using PI#_ as the basis for change. Approval by meeting vote (simple majority) and final approval through ballot. TC develops revision without a Public Input for basis i. Sample Motion: I make a motion to revise section as follows. Approval by meeting vote (simple majority) and final approval through ballot. First Revisions require a committee statement Committee Input TC may create a Committee Input (CI). This replaces the old system rejected Committee Proposals. CIs will get printed in the report but will not be balloted or shown as a change in the draft. CIs are used to solicit public comments and/or as a placeholder for the comment stage. i. Sample Motion: I make a motion to create a CI with a proposed revision to section as follows. Approval by meeting vote (simple majority). Not subject to ballot. Requires a committee statement to explain the intent of making a CI. Page 14 of 45

Comparison to Previous Process: PREVIOUS ACTIONS CURRENT PROCESS ACTIONS SAMPLE MOTION Accept or any variation of Accept (APA, APR, APP) on a public proposal 1) Committee generates a First Revision and Substantiation (CS) for change Rejected Public Proposal 2) Committee provides response (CS) to each PI that is associated with the revision Committee provides response (CS) to PI 1) I make a motion to revise section using PI#_ as the basis for change. 2) I make a motion to resolve PIs#_ through ## with the following statement I make a motion to resolve PI#_ with the following committee statement. Accepted Committee Proposal Rejected Committee Proposal Committee generates a First Revision and Substantiation (CS) for change Committee generates a Committee Input (CI) and reason (CS) for proposed change I make a motion to revise section as follows. Committee generates a statement for reason for change I make a motion to create a CI with a proposed revision to section as follows. Committee generates a statement for reason for CI. Notes: 1) All meeting actions require a favorable vote of a simple majority of the members present. 2) All First Revisions will be contained in the ballot and will require a 2/3 affirmative vote to confirm the meeting action. 3) Only the First Revisions will be balloted. PIs and CIs will be contained in the report but will not be balloted. 4) Comments may be submitted on all PIs, FRs and CIs Page 15 of 45

Term Comparison between Current and Old: CURRENT TERM Input Stage Public Input (PI) First Draft Meeting Committee Input Committee Statement (CS) First Revision (FR) First Draft Report First Draft Comment Stage Public Comment Second Draft Meeting Committee Comment Committee Action Second Revision Second Draft Report Second Draft OLD TERM ROP Stage Proposal ROP Meeting Committee Proposal that Fail Ballot Committee Statement Committee Proposal or Accepted Public Proposal ROP ROP Draft ROC Stage Public Comment ROC Meeting Committee Comment that Fail Ballot Committee Action Committee Comment or Accepted Public Comment ROC ROC Draft Note: The highlighted terms are the ones that will be most applicable at the First Draft Meeting. Page 16 of 45

Attachment E: NFPA 82 F2018 Public Input Page 17 of 45

of 27 1/20/2017 1:27 PM Public Input No. 15-NFPA 82-2016 [ Section No. 2.2 ] 2.2 NFPA Publications. National Fire Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02169-7471. NFPA 13, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems,2013 2016 edition. NFPA 31, Standard for the Installation of Oil-Burning Equipment,2011 2016 edition. NFPA 54, National Fuel Gas Code,2012 2015 edition. NFPA 58, Liquefied Petroleum Gas Code,2014 2017 edition. NFPA 70, National Electrical Code,2014 2017 edition. NFPA 80, Standard for Fire Doors and Other Opening Protectives,2013 2016 edition. NFPA 90A, Standard for the Installation of Air-Conditioning and Ventilating Systems,2012 2015 edition. NFPA 97, Standard Glossary of Terms Relating to Chimneys, Vents, and Heat-Producing Appliances, 2003 edition. NFPA 211, Standard for Chimneys, Fireplaces, Vents, and Solid Fuel Burning Appliances,2013 2016 edition. NFPA 259, Standard Test Method for Potential Heat of Building Materials, 2013 edition. NFPA 5000, Building Construction and Safety Code,2012 2015 edition. General update to references. There is terminology within NFPA 82 pertaining to appliances and chimneys that is defined in NFPA 97. The addition of NFPA 97 will help consistency in the language between standards. Submitter Full Name: Michael Luft Organization: Van-Packer Company, Inc. Submittal Date: Fri Dec 16 11:14:56 EST 2016 Page 18 of 45

of 27 1/20/2017 1:27 PM Public Input No. 16-NFPA 82-2016 [ Section No. 2.3.1 ] 2.3.1 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. ASTM C 27, Standard Classification for Fireclay and High-Alumina Refractory Brick, 1998 (2008 2013 ). ASTM C 199, Standard Test Method for Pier Test for Refractory Mortars, 1984 (2011 2016 ). General update to current reference materials. Submitter Full Name: Michael Luft Organization: Van-Packer Company, Inc. Submittal Date: Fri Dec 16 11:28:30 EST 2016 Page 19 of 45

of 27 1/20/2017 1:27 PM Public Input No. 26-NFPA 82-2016 [ Section No. 2.3.1 ] 2.3.1 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. ASTM C 27 C27, Standard Classification for Fireclay and High-Alumina Refractory Brick, 1998 (2008 2013 ). ASTM C 199 C199, Standard Test Method for Pier Test for Refractory Mortars, 1984 (2011 2016 ). ASTM E119, Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials (2016a). updates and addition of ASTM E119 per PI 30. Related Public Inputs for This Document Related Input Public Input No. 30-NFPA 82-2017 [Chapter 4] Relationship Submitter Full Name: Marcelo Hirschler Organization: GBH International Submittal Date: Thu Dec 22 17:20:08 EST 2016 Page 20 of 45

of 27 1/20/2017 1:27 PM Public Input No. 1-NFPA 82-2015 [ Section No. 2.3.2 ] 2.3.2 ASHRAE Publications. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers, Inc., 1791 Tullie Circle, N.E., Atlanta, GA 30329. ASHRAE Handbook, HVAC Systems and Equipment, 2008 2012. This proposal is updating the reference to the ASHRAE HVAC Systems and Equipment Handbook to the most recent version. Submitter Full Name: STEVEN FERGUSON Organization: ASHRAE Submittal Date: Tue Sep 01 14:57:01 EDT 2015 Page 21 of 45

of 27 1/20/2017 1:27 PM Public Input No. 17-NFPA 82-2016 [ Section No. 2.3.2 ] 2.3.2 ASHRAE Publications. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers, Inc., 1791 Tullie Circle, N.E., Atlanta, GA 30329. ASHRAE Handbook HVAC Systems and Equipment, 2008 2012. General update to reference materials. Submitter Full Name: Michael Luft Organization: Van-Packer Company, Inc. Submittal Date: Fri Dec 16 11:30:36 EST 2016 Page 22 of 45

of 27 1/20/2017 1:27 PM Public Input No. 21-NFPA 82-2016 [ New Section after 3.3.2 ] 3.3.2.1 Combustible Material. Material made of or surfaced with wood, compressed paper, plant fibers, plastics, or other material that can ignite and burn, whether flameproofed or not, or whether plastered or unplastered. Under the revised header of 3.3.2 Materials, the definition of combustible material is required. Cited definition is from NFPA 211 3.3.100.1 Related Public Inputs for This Document Related Input Public Input No. 20-NFPA 82-2016 [Section No. 3.3.2] Relationship Submitter Full Name: Michael Luft Organization: Van-Packer Company, Inc. Submittal Date: Fri Dec 16 16:08:29 EST 2016 Page 23 of 45

of 27 1/20/2017 1:27 PM Public Input No. 22-NFPA 82-2016 [ New Section after 3.3.2 ] 3.3.2.2 Noncombustible Material. A material that, in the form in which it is used and under the conditions anticipated, will not ignite, burn, support combustion, or release flammable vapors, when subjected to fire or heat; materials that are reported as passing ASTM E136, Standard Test Method for Behavior of Materials in a Vertical Tube Furnace at 750 C, shall be considered noncombustible materials. Under the revised header of 3.3.2 Materials, the definition of noncombustible material is required. Cited definition is from NFPA 211 3.3.100.2 Related Public Inputs for This Document Related Input Public Input No. 20-NFPA 82-2016 [Section No. 3.3.2] Relationship Submitter Full Name: Michael Luft Organization: Van-Packer Company, Inc. Submittal Date: Fri Dec 16 16:16:03 EST 2016 Page 24 of 45

of 27 1/20/2017 1:27 PM Public Input No. 20-NFPA 82-2016 [ Section No. 3.3.2 ] 3.3.2 Combustible Material. Capable of undergoing combustion. The standard uses terms such as "combustible material" and "noncombustible material". Changing the combustible section to materials and the defining combustible and noncombustible materials under this section will add clarity to the context where such terms are used in the standard. Wording is the same as from NFPA 211 section 3.3.100, 3.3.100.1, and 3.3.100.2 Related Public Inputs for This Document Related Input Public Input No. 21-NFPA 82-2016 [New Section after 3.3.2] Public Input No. 22-NFPA 82-2016 [New Section after 3.3.2] Relationship Definition of Combustible Material Definition of Noncombustible Material Submitter Full Name: Michael Luft Organization: Van-Packer Company, Inc. Submittal Date: Fri Dec 16 15:57:13 EST 2016 Page 25 of 45

of 27 1/20/2017 1:27 PM Public Input No. 18-NFPA 82-2016 [ Section No. 3.3.7 ] 3.3.7* Incinerator. Equipment predominantly designed for burning solid waste An appliance or combustion chamber for the reduction, by burning, of rubbish, garbage, and other wastes. This definition is consistent with the current definition in NFPA 211 (3.3.91) and also included in NFPA 97 (3.3.113). Related Public Inputs for This Document Related Input Public Input No. 19-NFPA 82-2016 [Section No. A.3.3.7] Relationship Annex with further definitions of incinerator systems Submitter Full Name: Michael Luft Organization: Van-Packer Company, Inc. Submittal Date: Fri Dec 16 15:19:54 EST 2016 Page 26 of 45

0 of 27 1/20/2017 1:27 PM Public Input No. 23-NFPA 82-2016 [ New Section after 3.3.11 ] 3.3.12 Clearance. The distance between a heat-producing appliance, chimney, chimney connector, vent, vent connector, or plenum and other surfaces. Though there is a section on clearances in the standard, "clearance" as a general term has not been defined. The definition will improve the context of sections 5.2.4 Clearances and 5.3.5 Chimney Clearances. Definition cited is from NFPA 211 3.3.38 / NFPA 97 3.3.40 Submitter Full Name: Michael Luft Organization: Van-Packer Company, Inc. Submittal Date: Fri Dec 16 16:27:43 EST 2016 Page 27 of 45

1 of 27 1/20/2017 1:27 PM Public Input No. 25-NFPA 82-2016 [ New Section after 3.3.11 ] 3.3.13 Spark Arresters. Screening material or a screening device attached to a chimney termination to prevent the passage of sparkes and brands to the outside atmosphere. Under the revised header of 5.1.4.1 Spark Arresters the general definition is not given and should be included. Cited definition is from NFPA 211 3.3.125 and NFPA 97 3.3.189 Related Public Inputs for This Document Related Input Public Input No. 24-NFPA 82-2016 [Section No. 5.1.4] Relationship Section pertaining to spark arresters Submitter Full Name: Michael Luft Organization: Van-Packer Company, Inc. Submittal Date: Tue Dec 20 12:58:14 EST 2016 Page 28 of 45

2 of 27 1/20/2017 1:27 PM Public Input No. 30-NFPA 82-2017 [ Chapter 4 ] Chapter 4 General 4.1 Opening Protectives. 4.1.1 Where required by this standard, openings required to have a fire protection rating shall be protected by approved fire door assemblies that are installed and maintained in accordance with NFPA 80, Standard for Fire Doors and Other Opening Protectives, except as otherwise specified by this standard. 4.2* Fire resistance rating Where a fire resistance rating is required by this standard it shall be determined in accordance with the requirements of ASTM E119, Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials, unless another fire resistance test method is specified explicitly. Throughout the standard, fire resistance ratings are required to be measured but no standard is specified. The default standard should be ASTM E119, unless a specific alternate fire resistance standard is specified. This will ensure adequate fire resistance of the building elements. Related Public Inputs for This Document Related Input Public Input No. 26-NFPA 82-2016 [Section No. 2.3.1] Public Input No. 31-NFPA 82-2017 [New Section after A.3.3.7] Relationship Submitter Full Name: Marcelo Hirschler Organization: GBH International Submittal Date: Thu Jan 05 16:57:06 EST 2017 Page 29 of 45

3 of 27 1/20/2017 1:27 PM Public Input No. 24-NFPA 82-2016 [ Section No. 5.1.4 ] 5.1.4 Spark Arresters. 5.1.4.1 Sparks / Fly Ash Protection. Where the nature of the waste being incinerated produces fly ash emissions, the incinerator stacks shall be protected by one of the following: (1) Spark arresters installed on incinerator stacks (2) A wet scrubber or other emission control system or component installed between the incinerator and the stack such that fly ash cannot pass directly from the incinerator to the stack (3) Approved design and control features that prevent the entrainment of fly ash from the incinerator to the stack under all operating conditions 5.1.4.2 1 Spark Arresters. 5.1.4.1.1 The net free area of the arrester shall be not less than four three times the net free area of the outlet of the chimney flue it serves. 5.1.4.3 Arresters 1.2 The arrester shall have a vertical height of not less than 1.3 times the minimum diameter of the chimney flue or the minimum horizontal dimension of a rectangular chimney flue. 5.1.4.4 Arresters, including 1.3 The arrestor screen shall have heat and corrosion resistance equivalent to 19 gauge [0.041 in. (1.04 mm)] galvanized steel or 24 gauge [0.024 in. (0.61 mm)] stainless steel. In addition, bolts, rivets, screws, and supporting members, shall be made of heat- and corrosion-resistant materials. 5.1.4.5 1.4 Openings shall not permit the passage of spheres having a diameter larger than 1/2 in. ( 12.7 mm ( 1 2 in. ) or block the passage of spheres having a diameter of less than 3/8 in. ( 9.5 mm ( 3 8 in. ). Page 30 of 45

4 of 27 1/20/2017 1:27 PM 5.1.4.6 1.5 Means shall be provided for securely attaching the spark arresters to chimneys to arrester to the chimney. The attachment method shall provide adequate support and prevent preventing the movement or detachment of the arresters arrester during normal operation and designed wind loads. 5.1.4. 1.6 The spark screen shall be accessible for cleaning, and the screen shall be removable to allow the cleaning of the chimney flue. Where a screen is not removable because it is part of a chimney cap assembly or the like, then the assembly shall be removable to allow the cleaning of the chimney flue. 5.1.4.1. 7 Spark screens shall be replaceable. Where a screen is part of a chimney cap assembly or the like and the assembly is not intended to have the screen removed and or replaced, then the assembly shall be replacable. 5.1.4.1.8 Where part of a listed chimney termination system, spark arresters shall be constructed and installed in accordance with the listing. The original spark arresters section scope (5.1.4.1) is more about spark/fly ash prevention from entering and or exiting the chimney flue. I have suggested a name consistent with that for the section. Spark arresters are one method of preventing sparks & fly ash from exiting the chimney flue and pertinent information pertaining to them should be grouped accordingly. I have added and corrected some of the language and requirements for spark arresters to be more consistent with NFPA 211. Related Public Inputs for This Document Related Input Public Input No. 25-NFPA 82-2016 [New Section after 3.3.11] Relationship Submitter Full Name: Michael Luft Organization: Van-Packer Company, Inc. Submittal Date: Fri Dec 16 17:11:43 EST 2016 Page 31 of 45

5 of 27 1/20/2017 1:27 PM Public Input No. 5-NFPA 82-2016 [ Section No. 6.2.3.3.1.1 ] 6.2.3.3.1.1 All chute intake doors into a waste chute shall be provided with a self-closing, positive latching and gasketed, fire door assembly in accordance with 6.2.3.1.3. There are some trash chute manufacturer's doors that require a gasket and some do not. If the manufacturer has a door that was listed and tested by a NRTL without a gasket, then to ask for one using the current language could void the listing. Deleting the word "gasket" from the current language would clear up the problem. There are special inspectors that are going around to condominium buildings telling the associations they have to install gaskets on trash chutes without them. These particular trash chutes are not required by the manufacturer's listing to have them. Submitter Full Name: Janet Washburn Organization: City of Hollywood Fire Department Submittal Date: Sun Apr 03 19:08:37 EDT 2016 Page 32 of 45

6 of 27 1/20/2017 1:27 PM Public Input No. 6-NFPA 82-2016 [ Section No. 6.2.3.3.1.1 ] 6.2.3.3.1.1 All chute intake doors into a waste chute shall be provided with a self-closing, positive and positive latching and gasketed fire door assembly in accordance with 6.2.3.1.3. Chute doors are currently being manufactured and listed that do not come equipped with a gasket. The language in this section, requiring a gasket, is causing AHJs to mandate a gasket be provided on a listed chute door assembly. This is causing the listed product to be modified in a manner that is inconsistent with the listing. In a number of cases, the addition of a gasket to these listed non-gasket equipped doors, causes them to not seat correctly. With chute doors achieving a listing without a gasket, it appears the need for a gasket is highly questionable. Either the TC needs to affirm that chute doors must be provided with a manufacture provided gasket that is part of the door assembly or remove the gasket requirement. A number of PI's are submitted on this issue to provide the TC with a number of different options to address this problem. The goal of these PI's is not to advocate for a particular position but to bring clarity to an issue that is creating significant field interpretation problems with AHJs and maintenance issues related to chute door gaskets in new and existing applications. Related Public Inputs for This Document Related Input Public Input No. 7-NFPA 82-2016 [New Section after 6.2.3.3.1.2] Public Input No. 8-NFPA 82-2016 [New Section after A.10.1] Public Input No. 9-NFPA 82-2016 [New Section after 11.2.3] Public Input No. 10-NFPA 82-2016 [New Section after 11.2.3] Public Input No. 7-NFPA 82-2016 [New Section after 6.2.3.3.1.2] Public Input No. 8-NFPA 82-2016 [New Section after A.10.1] Public Input No. 9-NFPA 82-2016 [New Section after 11.2.3] Public Input No. 10-NFPA 82-2016 [New Section after 11.2.3] Relationship Similar Issues Similar Issues Similar Issues Similar Issues Submitter Full Name: Anthony Apfelbeck Organization: Altamonte Springs Building/Fire Safety Division Submittal Date: Mon Apr 04 09:18:32 EDT 2016 Page 33 of 45

7 of 27 1/20/2017 1:27 PM Public Input No. 7-NFPA 82-2016 [ New Section after 6.2.3.3.1.2 ] 6.2.3.3.1.2.1 The listing and installation shall include the use of a manufacture supplied gasket. Chute doors are currently being manufactured and listed that do not come equipped with a gasket. This is causing the listed product to be modified in a manner that is inconsistent with the listing. In a number of cases, the addition of a gasket to these listed non-gasket equipped doors, causes them to not seat correctly. If it is the intent of the TC to require a gasket on all chute intake doors, this needs to be clearly specified that the gasket should be part of the manufactures installation instructions and part of the listing. A number of PI's are submitted on this issue to provide the TC with a number of different options to address this problem. The goal of these PI's is not to advocate for a particular position but to bring clarity to an issue that is creating significant field interpretation problems with AHJs and maintenance issues related to chute door gaskets in new and existing applications. Related Public Inputs for This Document Related Input Public Input No. 6-NFPA 82-2016 [Section No. 6.2.3.3.1.1] Public Input No. 6-NFPA 82-2016 [Section No. 6.2.3.3.1.1] Public Input No. 8-NFPA 82-2016 [New Section after A.10.1] Public Input No. 9-NFPA 82-2016 [New Section after 11.2.3] Public Input No. 10-NFPA 82-2016 [New Section after 11.2.3] Relationship Similar Issue Submitter Full Name: Anthony Apfelbeck Organization: Altamonte Springs Building/Fire Safety Division Submittal Date: Mon Apr 04 09:32:26 EDT 2016 Page 34 of 45

8 of 27 1/20/2017 1:27 PM Public Input No. 29-NFPA 82-2017 [ Section No. 6.3.2.4.2 ] 6.3.2.4.2 To avoid vacuum leaks, riser pipe joints shall be flanged, gasketed, and bolted, or lap welded. Additional Proposed Changes File Name NFPA_82_Held_PC_6.pdf 52_PC # 6 Description Approved This Public Input appeared as Reject but Hold in the Public Comment No 6 of the F2018 Second Draft Report for NFPA 82 and per the Regs. at 6.3.2.4.2 Submitter Full TC ON ICN-AAA Name: NFPA TC ON INCINERATORS AND WASTE HANDLING Organization: SYSTEMS Submittal Date: Tue Jan 03 13:21:56 EST 2017 Page 35 of 45

http://submittals.nfpa.org/terraviewweb/contentfetcher?commentparams=%28comment... Page 5 of 10 5/10/2013 Public Comment No. 6-NFPA 82-2012 [ Section No. 6.3.2.4.2 ] 6.3.2.4.2 To avoid vacuum leaks, riser pipe shall joints shall be flanged, gasketed, and bolted, or lap welded. Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment Adding "joints" provides subject clarity. Allowing Lap welded joints provides construction flexibility without compromising fire safety. Submitter Full Name: DAN BINGHAM Organization: TRANSVAC SOLUTIONS Submittal Date: Thu Nov 15 18:53:10 EST 2012 Committee Statement Committee Action: Resolution: Rejected but held This is new material and will be held until the next revision cycle in accordance with NFPA Regulations. Copyright Assignment I, DAN BINGHAM, hereby irrevocably grant and assign to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) all and full rights in copyright in this Public Comment (including both the Proposed Change and the Statement of Problem and Substantiation). I understand and intend that I acquire no rights, including rights as a joint author, in any publication of the NFPA in which this Public Comment in this or another similar or derivative form is used. I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Public Comment and that I have full power and authority to enter into this copyright assignment. By checking this box I affirm that I am DAN BINGHAM, and I agree to be legally bound by the above Copyright Assignment and the terms and conditions contained therein. I understand and intend that, by checking this box, I am creating an electronic signature that will, upon my submission of this form, have the same legal force and effect as a handwritten signature Page 36 of 45

9 of 27 1/20/2017 1:27 PM Public Input No. 10-NFPA 82-2016 [ New Section after 11.2.3 ] 11.2.4 Gaskets on chute intake doors shall only be provided on exisitng chute intake doors when required by the manufacture and the listing. 11.2.4.1 Where gaskets are required on chute intake doors, they shall be listed for the application or approved by the manufacture. This language clarifies that existing chute intake doors should not be retrofit with gaskets and when gaskets are required, they shall be approved by the manufacturer and meet the requirements of the listing. Chute doors are currently being manufactured and listed that do not come equipped with a gasket. The language, requiring a gasket in Chapter 6, is causing AHJs to mandate a gasket be provided on a non-gasket equipped listed chute door assembly. This is causing the listed product to be modified in a manner that is inconsistent with the listing. In a number of cases, the addition of a gasket to these listed non-gasket equipped doors, causes them to not seat correctly. A number of PI's are submitted on this issue to provide the TC with a number of different options to address this problem. The goal of these PI's is not to advocate for a particular position but to bring clarity to an issue that is creating significant field interpretation problems with AHJs and maintenance issues related to chute door gaskets in new and existing applications. Related Public Inputs for This Document Related Input Public Input No. 6-NFPA 82-2016 [Section No. 6.2.3.3.1.1] Public Input No. 7-NFPA 82-2016 [New Section after 6.2.3.3.1.2] Public Input No. 8-NFPA 82-2016 [New Section after A.10.1] Public Input No. 9-NFPA 82-2016 [New Section after 11.2.3] Public Input No. 6-NFPA 82-2016 [Section No. 6.2.3.3.1.1] Public Input No. 9-NFPA 82-2016 [New Section after 11.2.3] Relationship Similar issue. Similar issue. Similar issue. Similar issue. Submitter Full Name: Anthony Apfelbeck Organization: Altamonte Springs Building/Fire Safety Division Submittal Date: Mon Apr 04 09:52:01 EDT 2016 Page 37 of 45

0 of 27 1/20/2017 1:27 PM Public Input No. 9-NFPA 82-2016 [ New Section after 11.2.3 ] 11.2.4 Modification to a waste and linen chute and transporation system, including chute intake and discharge doors, shall only occur in accordance with this standard, the manufactures installation instructions and the listing. Chute doors are currently being, and have been manufactured, and listed without a gasket. The language in NFPA 82, requiring a gasket, causes some AHJs to mandate a gasket be provided on a listed chute door assembly that is not normally equipped with one. This is causing the listed product to be modified in a manner that is inconsistent with the listing. In a number of cases, the addition of a gasket to these listed non-gasket equipped doors, causes them to not seat correctly. This proposed language provides guidance that modification of systems shall be in accordance with this standard, the manufactures installation instructions and the listing. A number of PI's are submitted on this issue to provide the TC with a number of different options to address this problem. The goal of these PI's is not to advocate for a particular position but to bring clarity to an issue that is creating significant field interpretation problems with AHJs and maintenance issues related to chute door gaskets in new and existing applications. Related Public Inputs for This Document Related Input Public Input No. 6-NFPA 82-2016 [Section No. 6.2.3.3.1.1] Public Input No. 7-NFPA 82-2016 [New Section after 6.2.3.3.1.2] Public Input No. 8-NFPA 82-2016 [New Section after A.10.1] Public Input No. 10-NFPA 82-2016 [New Section after 11.2.3] Public Input No. 6-NFPA 82-2016 [Section No. 6.2.3.3.1.1] Public Input No. 10-NFPA 82-2016 [New Section after 11.2.3] Relationship Related Issue Related Issue Related Issue Related Issue Submitter Full Name: Anthony Apfelbeck Organization: Altamonte Springs Building/Fire Safety Division Submittal Date: Mon Apr 04 09:45:47 EDT 2016 Page 38 of 45

1 of 27 1/20/2017 1:27 PM Public Input No. 12-NFPA 82-2016 [ Section No. 11.3.1 ] 11.3.1 Waste compactors shall be inspected and maintained not less than, at minimum, annually in accordance with manufacturers' instructions. The original text (not less than annually) would mean the inspection should NOT take place at any time period shorter than annually. The inspection should be required to take place in no time period greater than annually, thus requiring at least an annual inspection. Submitter Full Name: David Cannata Organization: The Potpourri Group Submittal Date: Wed Nov 09 10:26:29 EST 2016 Page 39 of 45

2 of 27 1/20/2017 1:27 PM Public Input No. 31-NFPA 82-2017 [ New Section after A.3.3.7 ] A.4.2 The default fire resistance test should be ASTM E119, Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials. If an alternate fire resistance test is specified, such as a more severe test or one issued by a different standards development organization, this should be stated explicitly. Otherwise it would be possible for a user to employ a mild test and still state that a certain fire resistance rating has been achieved. clarification Related Public Inputs for This Document Related Input Public Input No. 30-NFPA 82-2017 [Chapter 4] Public Input No. 27-NFPA 82-2016 [Section No. B.1.2.1] Relationship Submitter Full Name: Marcelo Hirschler Organization: GBH International Submittal Date: Thu Jan 05 17:03:59 EST 2017 Page 40 of 45

3 of 27 1/20/2017 1:27 PM Public Input No. 19-NFPA 82-2016 [ Section No. A.3.3.7 ] A.3.3.7 Incinerator. The most applicable systems under this definition include, but are not limited to, controlled air systems, rotary kiln systems, and multiple-chamber type incineration systems. Some additional incinerator system deffinitions are as follows: Chute-Fed Incinerator (Class IIA). An incinerator designed specifically to be fed refuse from one or more floors above the incinerator directly into the incinerator by a separate chute constructed with a positive means to avoid penetration by smoke or fumes and connected directly over the primary combustion chamber. The incinerator is built with a primary and a secondary combustion chamber and a settling chamber. It can include a flue gas washer or scrubber. A separate chimney serves to convey the combustion gases to the outdoors. This class of incinerator is suitable for Type 1 and Type 2 wastes. It generally is used in residential and institutional buildings, including apartments, clubs, dormitories, churches, schools, and other occupancies where Type 1 and Type 2 wastes are to be incinerated. Commercial-Industrial-Type Incinerator (Classes III, IV, V, VI, and VII). An incinerator having a charging capacity in excess of 5 ft3 (0.14 m3) and suitable for a variety of wastes as follows: (1) Class III Waste Type 0, Type 1, or Type 2; (2) Class IV Waste Type 3; (3) Class V Waste Types 0 4 (municipal incinerators); (4) Class VI Waste Type 4; (5) Class VII Waste Types 5 and 6. Flue-Fed Incinerator (Class II). An incinerator served by a single chimney flue that serves also as the charging chute, where refuse is fed directly to the incinerator through this chimney flue from one or more floors above the incinerator. This class of incinerator is suitable for Type 1 and Type 2 waste materials and garbage incidental to residential occupancy in single-family and multifamily buildings. This class of incinerator is generally used in residential and institutional buildings, including apartments, clubs, dormitories, churches, schools, and other occupancies where Type 1 and Type 2 wastes are to be incinerated. Residential-Type Incinerator. An incinerator for the burning of ordinary combustible waste material and garbage (Type 2 waste) incidental to residential occupancy and having a firebox or charging compartment not greater than 5 ft3 (0.14 m3) in capacity. Residential-type incinerators can be self-contained, factory-built units that do not necessitate field construction, or can be of a built-in type designed to be encased in masonry or installed in a masonry wall or chimney. The addition of the annex materials further defines incinerator systems. The definitions have been taken from NFPA 211 sections 3.3.91.1, 3.3.91.2, 3.3.91.3, and 3.3.91.4. Related Public Inputs for This Document Related Input Public Input No. 18-NFPA 82-2016 [Section No. 3.3.7] Relationship Submitter Full Name: Michael Luft Page 41 of 45

4 of 27 1/20/2017 1:27 PM Organization: Van-Packer Company, Inc. Submittal Date: Fri Dec 16 15:28:33 EST 2016 Page 42 of 45

5 of 27 1/20/2017 1:27 PM Public Input No. 28-NFPA 82-2017 [ New Section after A.6.2 ] TITLE OF NEW CONTENT Type your content here... A.6.2.3.3.1.1 Chute intake doors are proprietary doors manufactured, listed and labeled specifically for use in waste chute applications. The fire performance of such doors can be determined in accordance with UL 10B, Fire Tests of Door Assemblies. The use of the proper type of chute intake door for waste chutes is critical for maintaining the fire performance of the chute. This proposal is intended to provide clarification on the proper door to be utilized in this application. Submitter Full Name: Kelly Nicolello Organization: UL LLC Submittal Date: Tue Jan 03 10:47:04 EST 2017 Page 43 of 45

6 of 27 1/20/2017 1:27 PM Public Input No. 8-NFPA 82-2016 [ New Section after A.10.1 ] A.11.2.2 Waste and linen shutes and transport systems, including chute intake and discharge door, should not be modified from the installation specifications provided in the listing or manufactures installation instructions. As an example, the installation of gaskets, on chute intake doors that were not manufactured nor listed with a gasket, can cause the doors to fail to close and can violate the listing. Chute doors are currently being manufactured and listed that do not come equipped with a gasket. The language in this section, requiring a gasket, is causing AHJs to mandate a gasket be provided on a listed chute door assembly. This is causing the listed product to be modified in a manner that is inconsistent with the listing. In a number of cases, the addition of a gasket to these listed non-gasket equipped doors, causes them to not seat correctly. The addition of this Annex language will assist the AHJ with understanding that doors, and other listed products, should not be modified from the specifications provided by the manufacture or the listing. A number of PI's are submitted on this issue to provide the TC with a number of different options to address this problem. The goal of these PI's is not to advocate for a particular position but to bring clarity to an issue that is creating significant field interpretation problems with AHJs and maintenance issues related to chute door gaskets in new and existing applications. Related Public Inputs for This Document Related Input Public Input No. 6-NFPA 82-2016 [Section No. 6.2.3.3.1.1] Public Input No. 7-NFPA 82-2016 [New Section after 6.2.3.3.1.2] Public Input No. 6-NFPA 82-2016 [Section No. 6.2.3.3.1.1] Public Input No. 9-NFPA 82-2016 [New Section after 11.2.3] Public Input No. 10-NFPA 82-2016 [New Section after 11.2.3] Relationship Similar issue. Similar issue. Submitter Full Name: Anthony Apfelbeck Organization: Altamonte Springs Building/Fire Safety Division Submittal Date: Mon Apr 04 09:38:24 EDT 2016 Page 44 of 45

7 of 27 1/20/2017 1:27 PM Public Input No. 27-NFPA 82-2016 [ Section No. B.1.2.1 ] B.1.2.1 ASTM Publications. ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. ASTM C 980 C980, Standard Specification for Industrial Chimney Lining Brick, 2010 2013a. ASTM E119, Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials, 2016a date update and addition of ASTM E119 per PI 31 Related Public Inputs for This Document Related Input Public Input No. 31-NFPA 82-2017 [New Section after A.3.3.7] Relationship Submitter Full Name: Marcelo Hirschler Organization: GBH International Submittal Date: Thu Dec 22 17:21:26 EST 2016 Page 45 of 45