DESIGN REVIEW DETERMINATION
|
|
- Avice Ross
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 DESIGN REVIEW DETERMINATION Project File No: LUA Project Name: Marina 87 Project Address: Applicant/Contact: Staff Contact: Determination: & th Avenue South Des Moines WA Jim Beckett, AIA, CDT, LEED AP Architect DLR Group 51 University Street, Suite 600 Seattle, WA Denise Lathrop, AICP Community Development Manager Phone: Address: dlathrop@desmoineswa.gov Approved pursuant to the conditions of approval listed below Date of Decision: June 10, 2016 REQUEST DLR Group (Applicant) requested a Design Review approval to construct an 89 unit apartment and mixed use project in the Marina District. Design Review is a Type I Land Use Action and, as such, is an administrative review approved by the Planning, Building and Public Works Director (Des Moines Municipal Code (DMMC) and ). Pursuant to DMMC the Applicant has requested to provide an in-lieu cash contribution to compensate for the unmet portion of the common recreation area requirement. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. On January 23, 2015, the Applicant submitted a Master Development Application for State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review and Design Review submittal materials to the City of Des Moines (City). A notice of complete application for the SEPA review and incomplete application for Design Review was sent to the applicant on February 6, A Traffic Impact Analysis and Parking Study dated October 19, 2014 was prepared by William Popp Associates. A revised Traffic and Parking Study was completed April 20, The City is acting as the lead agency as required by the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW. A Determination of Nonsignificance was issued on March 19, 2015 with comments due by April 3, No comments were received from the public. LUA Marina 87 Design Review Page 1 of 7 June 10, 2016
2 4. Pursuant to DMMC (9)(c), private recreational requirements required by DMMC (2) are not required for mixed use developments in the D-C zone. 5. Pursuant to DMMC (9)(e), 33% of the street level floor area shall be occupied by retail trade or personal and business services. 6. Pursuant to DMMC (2)(a), a Building Height Bonus is approved per the following: a. The proposed project is the second building within Area 1 on Figure 2 that has applied for the height bonus. b. The total floor area for the building of 3.15 does not exceed the maximum floor area ratio of 3.5. c. The building lot size of 23,520 SF meets the minimum lot size. d. Pedestrian oriented spaces are provided (Overview, Page 14): i. Retail and main residential entry is located on 7 th Avenue S. ii. iii. iv. Maximized commercial transparency and minimized blank walls, incorporating architectural screen to screen parking from pedestrian view. Creation of concrete piers break up building form and reduce scale at street level. Recessed entry plaza with generous landscaping provides room for tenant seating and activities to spill out into plaza (e.g. sidewalk cafe seating). v. Compatible fitness center and retail improve concentration of pedestrian activity. vi. Existing power vault and transformer to remain in existing location, planting and screening to keep it from view of pedestrians and tenants. 7. Pursuant to DMMC (1), a Parking Modification for the number of required parking spaces is approved per the following: a. The number of required parking stalls is: 0.72 stalls per bedroom stall per unit for guests + 1 stall for the rental office. b. Assuming 89 units with 108 bedrooms, the total requirement is: = 88 parking stalls. 8. Pursuant to DMMC (1), 17,800 SF of common recreation area is required. 9. On January 23, 2015, the Applicant submitted a Master Development Application SEPA and Design Review submittal materials to the City of Des Moines (City) for the project. The SEPA application was deemed complete on February 6, 2015 and additional information was requested for Design Review. 10. The Marina District is the civic and cultural center for Des Moines with a small-town charm reflecting the City s rich history that invites new businesses, development, shoppers and residents. A quality mix of services in the District encourages residents to shop locally and creates a destination for visitors. Improved pedestrian access to and from the Marina and Beach Park, and pedestrian amenities along South 223rd Street and South 227th Street enhance the image of Des Moines as a special Puget Sound waterfront community. Design guidelines encourage private participation and public art to reflect and celebrate the City s unique location and maritime heritage (Des Moines Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 10). 11. The City s Design Review process recognizes that land use regulations aimed at the orderliness of community growth, the protection and enhancement of property values, the minimization of discordant and unsightly surroundings, the avoidance of inappropriateness and poor quality of design and other environmental and aesthetic objectives provide for the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens and implement adopted land use policies and regulations (DMMC ). LUA Marina 87 Design Review Page 2 of 7 June 10, 2016
3 12. The Marina 87 Apartments were designed to conform to the land use standards as defined by the Marina District Design Guidelines. Special attention has been provided to ensure the project conforms to the recommendations related to: site planning; height, bulk, and scale; architectural elements and materials; pedestrian environment; and landscape design (Project Narrative, Page 5): a. The proposed design includes site design features intended to improve the pedestrian experience and minimize negative impacts from automobiles. b. The building form has been softened through modulation, distinctive entry features, and changes in materials to provide visual interest. c. Large storefront windows and multi-tenant entry locations have been provided to enhance the entry experience. The sidewalk has been widened, is using distinctive paving materials, and includes outdoor seating areas to enhance the pedestrian experience. d. Negative visual elements such as parking areas, utilities and refuse areas are screened and large expanses of concrete are being softened through textural and/or other design features. e. Landscaping is being provided and will reinforce the positive visual elements of the Marina District. 13. The Marina 87 Apartments were also designed to meet the standards defined in the Des Moines Municipal Code (DMMC) (Project Narrative, Page 5): ANALYSIS a. The proposed design meets minimum thresholds for street level business area. b. The project provides fifty-five percent of the mandated minimum common recreational area. The property owner proposes an in-lieu cash contribution for the balance as defined in DMMC c. No structural elements are included in the required 10-foot setback area along the west edge of the property. d. Total project area is within the defined floor area ratio for the Downtown Commercial zone. e. The project includes structured parking on two levels, accessed from the rear alley. Parking stall and aisle sizes conform to Des Moines parking standards. The number of required parking stalls is determined by city staff review of a third-party traffic consultant and are: 0.72 stalls per bedroom stall per unit for guests + 1 stall for the rental office. The primary goal in developing design guidelines is to ensure a higher quality built environment through the utilization of design approaches, techniques and elements and high quality building materials while allowing for creative design approaches. A topic-by-topic evaluation of the project s compliance with the Design Review Criteria in DMMC and the Marina District Design Guidelines (MDDG) is provided below. 1. Relationship to Building Site/Site Planning/Height, Bulk, and Scale/Pedestrian Environment (DMMC (1), MDDG A, MDDG B, MDDG D): a. The project will provide amenities along 7 th Avenue S., including pedestrian lighting, weather protection, special paving, landscaping, and a recessed entry plaza, pedestrian scale street trees, retail spill out, recessed and well-defined entries and material changes, wider sidewalks and more small open spaces that promote businesses and community activity clusters. (Floor Plan Level 1, Lighting Plan Level 1, Details - Canopy and Signage, Pages 18, 24, and 32). LUA Marina 87 Design Review Page 3 of 7 June 10, 2016
4 b. Residential open space and multifamily recreation area is provided in the form of private decks, interior courtyards, sky lounge and roof deck (Overview Multifamily Recreation Areas, Elevations, Southwest Corner Building Perspective, Page 15, and 34): i. The courtyard (Level 2) is oriented to take advantage of afternoon sunlight and views and provides shared space for pre-adolescent children and adults. Screen walls and landscaping create private patios for units surrounding the courtyard. The area is serviced by restrooms adjacent to the ground floor residential lobby. ii. iii. The Sky Lounge (Level 5) is a destination and event space oriented to take advantage of views, create indoor-outdoor connection to the roof deck above, provides amenities not available in units. Restroom facilities serve the lounge amenity spaces as well as roof deck above. The roof deck is located central to the building and provides a common recreation area with primary views to the west towards the Olympic Peninsula and secondary views east towards the downtown. Tempered glass parapets proposed around the roof deck serve as life safety guard rails while providing visual transparency. The roof deck is connected to Sky Lounge visually and physically with showcase stair that is enclosed by glass. c. Parking is located behind the building with access from the alley only and off-street bicycle rack parking is provided in Basement Level 1. Parking will be screened by an architectural screen and landscaping along 7 th Avenue S., and by a GreenScreen and a 5-foot landscape buffer along 6 th Place S. (alley). (Floor Plan - Basement Level 1, Elevation Materials, East and West Elevations, and Building Perspectives, Pages 17, 26, 27, 29, 33 and 34). d. Methods to minimize height, bulk and scale include: modulation, canopies, and defined entry areas that visually break up the east façade; building focal points that include distinctive entry features; changing materials; and a courtyard that minimizes massing along the west façade and alley. The north and south facades have been modulated to allow for window openings and decks while meeting minimum code requirements for a courtyard should buildings be built up to either property line. Board-textured castin-place concrete provides visual texture on walls longer than 20 feet. (Elevation Materials, Elevations, and Building Perspectives, Pages 25-30, 33 and 34). 2. Relationship of Building and Site to Adjoining Area (DMMC (2), MDDG A): a. The area in the Marine District where the building will be constructed currently does not have distinct architectural character. The surrounding neighborhood is a mix of small commercial and residential projects, ranging from single story retail buildings to 3-4 story apartments and condominium projects. While no buildings in the immediate area of the project are 55 feet in height at this time, one such building is under construction to the south, and the City anticipates and desires buildings of up to this height and density in the vicinity. The building will be adding favorably to the aesthetic and architectural character of the neighborhood. b. The building form has been softened through modulation, distinctive entry features, and changes in materials and color to provide visual interest. Large storefront windows and multi-tenant entry locations have been provided to enhance the entry experience. The sidewalk has been widened, is using distinctive paving materials, and includes outdoor seating areas to enhance the pedestrian experience. c. Landscaping is being provided and will reinforce the positive visual elements of the Marina District. Negative visual elements such as parking areas, utilities and refuse areas are screened, and large expanses of concrete are being softened through landscaping, textural and/or other design features. (Floor Plans and Building Perspectives, Pages and 33-34). LUA Marina 87 Design Review Page 4 of 7 June 10, 2016
5 3. Landscape and Site Treatment/Landscape Design (DMMC (3), MDDG E): a. Landscaping will be provided along the eastern and western building facades. Plantings will provide a soft transition between sidewalk and retail areas and screening of utility and parking areas. Deciduous street trees will provide summer shade, winter light and year-round visual interest. A green planting screen will be used at the alley level west facade to create a Type II visual buffer and screen parking from view. Plantings will be coordinated and selected appropriately according to their use and location. Denser plants will be installed in the buffer along the western property line. Permanent bench seats are provided by the building as public amenity within the entry plaza. The plaza space also provides an opportunity for future tenants to provide temporary tables and chairs. (Floor Plan-Level 1, East and West Elevations and Building Perspectives, Pages 17, 27, 29, 33 and 34). b. Trash and recycling functions will be located inside the building accessible from the north end of the alley. 4. Building Design/Architectural Elements and Materials (DMMC (4), MDDG C): a. The proposed building incorporates modulation, change of materials and special features that enhance its character and give the building a human scale. b. Variation in the roofline and modulation in the façade provides interest from above and below. Recessed balconies break up the vertical façade and staggered windows create a playful indication of activities inside. Generous street level windows and entrances, multitenant occupancy and walk-in traffic at the street level help to define the public space. The entry canopy protrudes beyond the property line to further draw attention and celebrate the entry plaza and provide weather protection. (Elevations, Canopy and Signage Details and Building Perspectives, Pages and 32-34). c. The color palate is inspired by the colors of the Pacific NW marine environment. Blues will be used as accent colors for railings, canopy glass and other accent features while grays will be used for fiber cement panels, the horizontal reveals, parapet cap flashing, and window frames. (Materials, Pages 25-26) d. Textured materials have been chosen to invoke a different scale and impart warmth. Fiber cement panels and metal panels have been used to achieve a cohesive look with minimal reveals. Real wood or wood composite paneling accent and warm up the inset balconies, and provide visual modulation of the facade. Painted steel channels create horizontal reveals at the floor line emphasizing horizontality of the façade. Clear glass railings, as well as glass with colored interlayer will be used for residential balcony guards and railings. Textured concrete is used for retaining and foundation walls. (Materials, Pages 25-26). e. Exterior lighting will be provided for general safety and to highlight certain design elements, while respecting adjacent neighbors. Proposed lighting includes accent lighting at entrance canopy and tenant signage, soffit lighting at entrance doors, down lighting at garage and trash doors for pedestrian safety, and low level lighting in landscaped areas. (Lighting Plan, Page 24). 5. Signs (DMMC (5), MDDG F): a. Building Signage to be formed of metal attached to entry canopy. Color to match palette of building, to be finalized at a later date. Tenant Signage to be a combination of blade signs and window graphics: Blade signs will to be attached to concrete piers, and located per plan. To be Halo lit or have letters lit against solid background. No light boxes proposed. Window graphics will be used to obscure visibility into space by not more than 50% of storefront area. b. Signage will be reviewed under a separate sign permit consistent with the requirements of Chapter DMMC, MDDG F, and DMMC (5). LUA Marina 87 Design Review Page 5 of 7 June 10, 2016
6 6. Modification of Parking Requirements (DMMC (3)): a. Based on a review of the plans and request for a waiver from the parking provisions for commercial uses in the Downtown Commercial Zone, the proposed waiver is approved pursuant to DMMC (3). The Design Review approval is granted; subject to compliance with the conditions of approval. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Design Review approval by the City constitutes only approval of the aesthetic design elements of the building and the site established by chapter DMMC. Design Review approval does not signify acceptance of all zoning, building, and engineering details of the project. These details remain subject to approval and shall be addressed as part of the building permit application process. 2. As part of the application for a building permit, the applicant shall submit: a. Landscaping Plans that are consistent with the requirements established by the City s Landscaping and Screening Code, Chapter DMMC. The resulting planting plan shall be dynamic with a variety of color and contemporary plant species. b. Parking Plan consistent with this design review decision and the requirements established by the City s Parking Code, Chapter DMMC. Pursuant to DMMC (1), a maximum of 50 percent of the total off-street parking stalls shall be designate for compact cars. Dimensions for stalls, including but not limited to stalls 14, 15, 30, 39, 47, 48, and 56 shall meet the requirements of DMMC Obstructions. c. Lighting Design consistent with requirements established by DMMC , DMMC , and the MDDG as part of the Building Permit submittal. 3. Pursuant to DMMC , no more than 50% of the common recreation area shall be indoors. The project has a deficit of 10,840 sf common recreation area. Per DMMC , the Director may allow a voluntary payment to the City in-lieu of providing the on-site common recreation facilities: The amount of payment shall be based upon the current assessed value (as determined by the County Assessor) of the entire development site. The amount of in-lieu contribution shall be as follows: Required common recreation area minus (-) provided common recreation area equals (=) X X/site area = Y Assessed value multiplied by Y = In-lieu contribution 4. Site is eligible for direct discharge exemption for stormwater detention. For Building Permit, please submit an abbreviated Technical Information Report per the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual addressing the core requirements. 5. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the building, the Applicant shall enter into a no protest agreement regarding the formation of a downtown business or parking improvement district pursuant to DMMC (3)(c). 6. On-site parking shall be for the use of residents only. Commercial parking shall not be allowed on site until further review is conducted. 7. Solid waste containers shall be screened pursuant to DMMC through 490. LUA Marina 87 Design Review Page 6 of 7 June 10, 2016
7 APPEAL 8. Signage will be reviewed under a separate sign permit consistent with the requirements of Chapter DMMC, MDDG F, and DMMC (5). Signage shall be consistent with the design review drawings. This decision is a Type I Land Use Action, which is appealable to the Hearing Examiner as provided in DMMC and APPROVAL Code Official: Position/Title: Daniel J. Brewer, P.E., P.T.O.E Planning, Building, and Public Works Director th Avenue South, Suite D Des Moines, WA June 10, 2016 (Date) (Signature) LUA Marina 87 Design Review Page 7 of 7 June 10, 2016
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center
Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center The Town Center Vision is scattered throughout the Comprehensive Plan, development code and the 1994 Town Center Plan. What follows are sections
More informationCITY OF MERCER ISLAND DESIGN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CITY OF MERCER ISLAND DESIGN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 2 March 9, 2011 Project: Description: Applicant: DSR11-004 The applicant is requesting approval to replace the existing exterior wood framed
More informationArchitectural Review Board Report
Architectural Review Board Report To: From: CC: Subject: Architectural Review Board Architectural Review Board Meeting: May 21, 2018 Agenda Item: 8-A Grace Page, Senior Planner Stephanie Reich, AIA, LEED
More informationVILLAGE OF SKOKIE Design Guidelines for Mixed-Use Districts NX Neighborhood Mixed-Use TX Transit Mixed-Use CX Core Mixed-Use
VILLAGE OF SKOKIE Design Guidelines for Mixed-Use Districts NX Neighborhood Mixed-Use TX Transit Mixed-Use CX Core Mixed-Use TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 SITE DESIGN Purpose 1 CHAPTER 2 SITE DESIGN Streetscape
More informationDRAFT Northeast Quadrant of Kipling Avenue and Highway 7 DRAFT AUGUST 29, Goals Land Use. The goals of this Plan are to:
AUGUST 29, 2017 12.15 Northeast Quadrant of Kipling Avenue and Highway 7 12.15.1 Goals 12.15.2 Land Use The goals of this Plan are to: 12.15.2.1 General Provisions: a) Ensure the development of a compact
More informationSUBCHAPTER 4-B GUIDELINES FOR THE B-3 COMMERCIAL CHARACTER AREA
1 SUBCHAPTER 4-B GUIDELINES FOR THE B-3 COMMERCIAL CHARACTER AREA Downtown Bozeman should be the location of buildings of greatest height and intensity in the community. The following guidelines apply
More informationELK GROVE TOWN CENTER DESIGN GUIDELINES
......... ELK GROVE TOWN CENTER DESIGN GUIDELINES LAGUNA RIDGE SPECIFIC PLAN... June 2008 ............ DESIGN GUIDELINES Table of Contents Contents Section A: Town Center Overview...1 A.1. Purpose and
More informationCommunity Mixed Use Zone Districts (CMU)
18.28.500 Community Mixed Use Zone Districts (CMU) The Community Mixed Use Zone Districts (CMU) are intended to help implement the land use goals and strategies found in the Golden Vision 2030 values,
More informationDESIGN GUIDELINES. Planning Commission Re-Submittal. December 23, 2014 Revised to include Mixed-Use Design District Guidelines
DESIGN GUIDELINES Planning Commission Re-Submittal December 23, 2014 Revised to include Mixed-Use Design District Guidelines Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION 4 II. PROJECT VISION 5 III. PRAIRIEFIRE DISTRICTS
More informationEXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Town Center Land Use Element: V. LAND USE POLICIES Town Center Mercer Island's business district vision as described in "Your Mercer Island Citizen-Designed Downtown" was an
More information(DC1) Direct Development Control Provision DC1 Area 4
. General Purpose (DC) Direct Development Control Provision DC Area 4 The purpose of this Provision is to provide for an area of commercial office employment and residential development in support of the
More informationPINE CURVE REZONING. Property does not meet criteria for open space preservation and is not a candidate for a park
PINE CURVE REZONING BACKGROUND Purchased as two parcels in 2001 and 2002 Annexed and Zoned Greater Downtown District Historic Center September 25, 2002 and October 7, 2002 WHAT THE PROJECT IS AND IS NOT
More informationFRUITVALE TRANSIT VILLAGE (Phase 2) Residential Project
FRUITVALE TRANSIT VILLAGE (Phase 2) Residential Project DEVELOPER: SIGNATURE PROPERTIES ARCHITECT: HKIT ARCHITECTS April 23, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 Vision 4 Description of Site 5 Guiding Concepts 6
More informationIncentive Zoning Regulations Florida Municipal City of Orlando
Topic: Resource Type: State: Jurisdiction Type: Municipality: Year (adopted, written, etc.): 2002 Community Type applicable to: Title: Incentive Zoning Regulations Florida Municipal City of Orlando Document
More informationThe Village. Chapter 3. Mixed Use Development Plan SPECIFIC PLAN
The Village SPECIFIC PLAN Chapter 3 3.1 INTRODUCTION 3.1.1 Purpose This Chapter describes the development regulations applicable to the Mixed-Use and Transit Center Planning Areas. These form-based regulations
More informationDivision VI Community Mixed Use (CMU) Architectural Guidelines and Standards
Division VI 18.40.800 Community Mixed Use (CMU) Architectural Guidelines and Standards 18.40.810 Guidelines The goals of the Comprehensive Plan include a focus on pedestrian safety, amenities and aesthetics
More informationArchitectural Review Board Report
Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Meeting: February 3, 2014 Agenda Item: 7.9 To: From: Subject: Architectural Review Board Steve Traeger, Principal Urban Designer Scott Albright,
More informationPlanning Board Hearing October 20th, 2016
Planning Board Hearing October 0th, 06 Developer: Real Estate Management & Leasing: Architect: Transportation Engineers: Landscape Architect: Civil Engineer: THE ARSENAL PROJECT Planning Board AGENDA Introduction
More informationResolution : Exhibit A. Downtown District Design Guidelines March 2003
Resolution 03-011: Exhibit A Downtown District Design Guidelines March 2003 DOWNTOWN DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS Adopted March 2003 1 DOWNTOWN DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES Adopted
More informationFRAMEWORK OF DESIGN REVIEW:
Introduction FRAMEWORK OF DESIGN REVIEW: All projects promote Superior Design by exhibiting thoughtful relationships in the following areas: Site; Architecture; Landscaping; Placemaking / Livability; and
More informationCommunity Design Plan
Gardena General Plan 2006 Authority While the is not a required element of a General Plan, it is included because improving the community appearance and image is paramount to the overall quality of life
More informationCITY OF ALAMEDA PLANNING BOARD Draft RESOLUTION
CITY OF ALAMEDA PLANNING BOARD Draft RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION PLN13-0157 TO CONSTRUCT ELEVEN
More informationSECTION TWO: Overall Design Guidelines
SECTION TWO: Overall Design Guidelines This section provides overall design principles and guidelines for the Gardnerville Mixed-use Overlay. They provide criteria for mixed-use places consisting of residential,
More informationCENTERS AND CORRIDORS
INITIAL DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES for CENTERS AND CORRIDORS City of Spokane Planning Services Third Floor, City Hall 808 W. Spokane Falls Blvd. Spokane, WA 99201-3329 (509) 625-6300 www.spokaneplanning.org
More information13. New Construction. Context & Character
13. New Construction Context & Character While historic districts convey a sense of time and place which is retained through the preservation of historic buildings and relationships, these areas continue
More informationCha p t e r 2: Ge n e r a l De s i g n Gu i d e l i n e s
Downtown Ann Arbor Design Guidelines Cha p t e r 2: Ge n e r a l De s i g n Gu i d e l i n e s This chapter presents general design guidelines for new site plan or PUD projects in downtown Ann Arbor. The
More informationBuildings may be set back to create small plazas provided that these setbacks do not substantially disrupt the street wall s continuity.
6-22 Community Design Street Walls and Street-front Setbacks The siting of buildings will play a critical role in establishing the character and sense of place for the District. Siting buildings at the
More informationSite Planning. 1.0 Site Context. 2.0 Pedestrian Circulation Systems. Pag e 2-23
The following photographs from throughout the country illustrate key urban design principles. Photographs are provided to illustrate the overall urban design concepts described in Chapter 1 of the Downtown
More informationNew Street Proposed Redevelopment Architecture & Urban Design Brief
2130 2136 New Street Proposed Redevelopment Architecture & Urban Design Brief Prepared By: Cynthia Zahoruk Architect Inc. 3077 New Street, Burlington, ON, L7N 1M6 TABLE OF CONTENTS Background and Objective
More informationMIDTOWN MIXED-USE VILLAGE. TECHNICAL DATA SHEET COMPONENT C-1 FOR PUBLIC HEARING - PETITION NUMBER Project No RZ1.1. Issued.
N MIDTOWN MIXED-USE VILLAGE TECHNICAL DATA SHEET COMPONENT C- FOR PUBLIC HEARING - PETITION NUMBER 04-00 Project No. 496 Issued Revised SCALE: " = 0' N 0 0 0 40 RZ. c GENERAL PROVISIONS: a. SITE LOCATION.
More informationCHAPTER ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS IN THE NC, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONE
CITY OF MOSES LAKE MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 18.31 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS IN THE NC, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONE Sections: 18.31.010 Purpose 18.31.020 Minimum Lot Area 18.31.030 Setbacks 18.31.040 Maximum
More informationHighland Village Green Design Guidelines
Highland Village Green Design Guidelines Publishing Information Title Highland Village Green Design Guidelins Author The City of Calgary Status DRAFT - Proposed document subject to changes Additional Copies
More informationPINE CURVE REZONING. BACKGROUND Purchased as two parcels in 2001 and 2002
BACKGROUND Purchased as two parcels in 2001 and 2002 WHAT THE PROJECT IS AND IS NOT A Rezoning establishes the land use standards for Annexed and Zoned Greater Downtown District Historic Center September
More informationCHAPTER 3. Design Standards for Business, Commercial, Industrial, Recreational and Institutional Uses
CHAPTER 3 Design Standards for Business, Commercial, Section Number Title Ordinance Number Date of Ordinance 16-3-1 Applicability 2006-11 2008-04 07-01-08 16-3-2 Uniform Standards for Architectural Design
More informationCommercial Development Permit Area
City of Kamloops KAMPLAN Commercial Development Permit Area PURPOSE The purpose of this Development Permit Area (DPA) is to establish objectives and provide guidelines for the form and character of commercial
More informationSUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
WHEN PROCESS TYPE III IS USED References to Process Type III applications are found in several places in the Milton Municipal Code (MMC), indicating that the development, activity, or use, is permitted
More informationMIXED-USE VILLAGE OVERLAY FLOATING DISTRICT
MIXED-USE VILLAGE OVERLAY FLOATING DISTRICT Zoning regulations developed by committee to the Planning Board for the Town of DeWitt, NY Issue date: 13 July 2017 revised 3/12/2018, revised 4/26/2018, 5/9/2018
More informationSMALL LOT DESIGN STANDARDS. An Illustrated Working Draft for Test Implementation
SMALL LOT DESIGN STANDARDS An Illustrated Working Draft for Test Implementation SMALL LOT DESIGN STANDARDS ILLUSTRATED WORKING FOR TEST IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW SMALL LOT CODE AMENDMENT & POLICY UPDATE
More information4. INDUSTRIAL 53 CASTLE ROCK DESIGN
4. INDUSTRIAL 53 CASTLE ROCK DESIGN CASTLE ROCK DESIGN 54 4. INDUSTRIAL Overview Well-designed and attractive industrial centers are the product of blending economic realities with both functional and
More informationWEST LOOP DESIGN GUIDELINES CHECKLIST
WEST LOOP DESIGN GUIDELINES CHECKLIST Section 1.0 General Strategies 1.1 DESIGN EXCELLENCE: ENCOURAGE HIGH QUALITY AND INNOVATIVE DESIGN OF NEW BUILDINGS WITHIN THE WEST LOOP WITHOUT BEING PRESCRIPTIVE
More informationSUBJECT: PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF PROJECT LOCATED AT E. COLORADO BOULEVARD (PASEO COLORADO)
TO: FROM: Honorable Mayor and City Council Planning & Community Development Department SUBJECT: PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF PROJECT LOCATED AT 260-400 E. COLORADO BOULEVARD (PASEO COLORADO) RECOMMENDATION:
More information4.0 Design Guidelines For The Village Centre. South fields Community Architectural Design Guidelines Town of Caledon
4.0 Design Guidelines For The Village Centre 4.0 Design Guidelines for the Village Centre The Village Centre is the focal point of the entire South Fields Community and is designed as a traditional commercial
More information4.9 Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan Design Guidelines
4.9 Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan Design Guidelines The Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan addresses the area between College Avenue and Steele Lane. Mendocino Avenue is a busy arterial that runs parallel
More informationWATERFRONT DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS
WATERFRONT DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS 20.25.080 WATERFRONT DISTRICT A. Purpose. This section is intended to implement The Waterfront District Subarea Plan by: 1. Creating a safe, vibrant mixed-use urban
More informationPC RESOLUTION NO ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL (AC)
PC RESOLUTION NO. 16-07-26- ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL (AC) 15-035 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL (AC) 15-035, INN AT
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE SITE PLAN CHAIR GUIDE
ARLINGTON COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE SITE PLAN CHAIR GUIDE Excerpts from the SPRC Operating Guide, 1/31/04 Revised March 17,2010 1. Site Plan Chair Responsibilities 1 1, The
More informationKEY MAP DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AREA MAP. Sunnymede North Sub-Area Plan
Richmond Official Community Plan BROADMOOR AREA SUNNYMEDE NORTH SUB-AREA PLAN Bylaw 7100 Schedule 2.6C SUNNYMEDE NORTH SUB-AREA PLAN SUNNYMEDE NORTH SUB-AREA PLAN SUNNYMEDE NORTH SUB-AREA PLAN KEY MAP
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of April 23, 2019 DATE: April 12, 2019 SUBJECT: SP #413 SITE PLAN AMENDMENT to permit a fixed bar in a private outdoor café space with associated
More informationCITY OF PUYALLUP. Background. Development Services
CITY OF PUYALLUP Development Services 333 South Meridian Puyallup WA 98371 To: City Council From: Katie Baker, AICP, Planning Division Re: South Hill Neighborhood Plan Adoption Date: (Meeting date: February
More informationDowntown. Design Review. City of Bartlesville Bartlesville welcomes and encourages Special Events. Special Events build a sense of
City of Bartlesville 8.2015 Downtown Design Review Bartlesville welcomes and encourages Special Events. Special Events build a sense of community Contents and create an environment that fosters civic pride.
More informationTOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN STANDARDS
1 of 38 3/10/2015 1:45 PM Sections: 19.11.010 General. 19.11.020 Town Center development General. 19.11.030 Nonconforming development. 19.11.040 Building height. 19.11.050 Significant public amenities.
More informationDesign Guidelines. Roosevelt. Mike Podowski DPD Design Guidelines Ordinance ATT 13 August 13, 2012 Version #1
Roosevelt Design Guidelines The Roosevelt Neighborhood Design Guidelines apply within the Neighborhood Boundary. Map 1 2 Map 2 3 Map 3 4 CS1 Natural Systems and Site Features Citywide Guideline: Use natural
More informationDESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM AGENDA DATE: AUGUST 2, 2017 TO: THRU: FROM: SUBJECT: Chair Imboden and Members of the Design Review Committee Anna Pehoushek, Assistant Community Development Director
More informationFLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist
FLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist Applicant s Name: Project Address: Phone: Email: Applicant shall fill out the design guidelines checklist for all guidelines applicable
More informationB L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development
B L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development Adopted June 18, 2009 This section of the Design and focuses on site planning and design guidance for new multi-family
More information3.1 community vision. 3.3 required plan elements
Chapter 3 Community Form 3.1 community vision 3.2 Parks & landscaping concepts 3.3 required plan elements D R A F T 20 Community Form Chapter 3 3.0 Community form 3.1 community vision The Specific Plan
More informationSDOT DPD. SDOT Director s Rule DPD Director s Rule DCLU DR SED DR of 7 CITY OF SEATTLE
SDOT SDOT Director s Rule 2-07 DPD Applicant: CITY OF SEATTLE Page 1 of 7 Supersedes: DCLU DR 11-93 SED DR 93-4 Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT) Department of Planning and Development (DPD)
More informationMetro. Activity Center Design Guidelines. Recommendations For Developing Focused, Mixed-Use Commercial/Residential Centers
Metro Activity Center Design Guidelines Recommendations For Developing Focused, Mixed-Use Commercial/Residential Centers Metro Activity Centers What is a MAC? Legacy, the adopted guide for the future growth
More informationCOMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION
COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION INTRODUCTION These guidelines were prepared in response to the needs of many users: developers, property owners, architects,
More informationPROPOSED WATERFRONT DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS
PROPOSED WATERFRONT DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS 20.25 DESIGN REVIEW. 20.25.080 WATERFRONT DISTRICT A. Purpose. This section is intended to implement The Waterfront District Subarea Plan by: 1. Creating a
More informationRequest Alternative Compliance to the prescribed criteria of the Oceanfront Resort District Form- Based Code. Staff Recommendation Approval
Applicant Property Owner Steven H. Murden Public Hearing June 14, 2017 City Council Election District Beach Agenda Item 8 Request Alternative Compliance to the prescribed criteria of the Oceanfront Resort
More informationSheridan Boulevard S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N S H E R I D A N B O U L E VA R D S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N
Sheridan Boulevard S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N 1 City of Lakewood Adopted November, 2006 S H E R I D A N B O U L E VA R D S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N The Vision The City of Lakewood s overall vision is
More informationRequest Alternative Compliance to the prescribed criteria of the Oceanfront Resort District Form-Based Code. Staff Planner Kristine Gay
Applicant/Owner Ocean Rental Properties, LLC Public Hearing April 13, 2016 City Council Election District Beach Agenda Item 1 Request Alternative Compliance to the prescribed criteria of the Oceanfront
More informationFREEWAY/TOURIST DISTRICT
FREEWAY/TOURIST DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE March, 2014 MOUNTLAKE TERRACE FREEWAY/TOURIST DESIGN STANDARDS March, 2014 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction...1 Design Site Design
More informationPUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THIS CHAPTER PUBLIC REALM
PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY This section provides design guidelines for improvements in the public right-of-way. The public right-of-way refers to streets, sidewalks, non-vehicular thoroughfares, parks and greenways
More informationCHAPTER 13 DESIGN GUIDELINES
CHAPTER 13 DESIGN GUIDELINES Section 1300.00 Section 1300.01 Design Guidelines Purpose The purposes of this section are to: A. The purpose of this Section is to establish procedures and standards to serve
More informationOfficial Plan Review: Draft Built Form Policies
PG.30.1 REPORT FOR ACTION Official Plan Review: Draft Built Form Policies Date: May 15, 2018 To: Planning and Growth Management Committee From: Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division
More informationDesign Review Application
Design Review Application OFFICIAL USE ONLY File Number: Date Received: By: Pre-Application Fee Paid: Design Review Fee Paid: Approved Date: Denied Date: By: ADRE: Yes No APPLICANT INFORMATION Project
More informationDRAFT DESIGN GUIDELINES
IHZ Booklet #7 May 6, 2010 DRAFT DESIGN GUIDELINES CANTERBURY 7 Overview During the recent planning process for the Plan of Conservation and Development community character was identified as an important
More informationWayfinding. North Gateway: Integrate a vertical gateway marker on the west side of Ward Street at the south corner of Vernon Street.
3.3.6.2 Wayfinding Existing Conditions Wayfinding signage is important to direct visitors and tourists to different locations in the downtown. A significant part of the wayfinding signage in the downtown
More informationVILLAGE OF CHANNAHON COMMERCIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES. Village of Channahon S. Navajo Drive Channahon, IL (815)
VILLAGE OF CHANNAHON COMMERCIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES Village of Channahon 24555 S. Navajo Drive Channahon, IL 60410 (815) 467-6644 www.channahon.org Adopted March 6, 2006 VILLAGE OF CHANNAHON COMMERCIAL DESIGN
More informationApproved: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 5, :30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL
Approved: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 5, 2015 6:30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL PLANNING CASES A. Planning Case 15-016; Final Planned Unit Development Arden Plaza;
More informationNeighborhood Districts
NEIGHBORHOOD DISTRICTS SEVEN MAIN DISTRICTS Neighborhood Districts While the Development Plan provides a broad-scale overview of the neighborhood, this section focuses on uses and relationships at the
More informationStreetscape Patterns. Design Guidelines, Ridgewood Village Center Historic District, Ridgewood, N.J. page 20
North Broad Street has a unique streetscape pattern with broad curving street, tight enclosure on the east side with attached commercial buildings aligned with the sidewalk, and landscaped open space on
More informationPLANNING BOARD REPORT PORTLAND, MAINE
PLANNING BOARD REPORT PORTLAND, MAINE Zero Canal Plaza Development 0 Canal Plaza 2016-162 Cow Plaza 1, LLC Submitted to: Portland Planning Board Date: August 4, 2016 Public Hearing Date: August 9, 2016
More informationCOMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
CITY OF LACEY Community Development Department 420 College Street Lacey, WA 98503 (360) 491-5642 COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION OFFICIAL USE ONLY Case Number: Date Received: By: Related Case Numbers:
More informationTown Center Design Guidelines
Adopted by City Council on September 18, 2018 Design Theme The Draper Town Center Design Theme is defined as encompassing those architectural design styles that were prevalent in the construction of civic
More informationCITY OF KEIZER MASTER PLAN APPLICATION & INFORMATION SHEET
CITY OF KEIZER MASTER PLAN APPLICATION & INFORMATION SHEET PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE Prior to the actual filing of a Master Plan application, it is strongly recommended that the applicant contact Planning
More information3.0 URBAN DESIGN. December 6, OVERVIEW
Urban Design 3.0 URBAN DESIGN December 6, 2007 3.1 OVERVIEW The highly urban character of Easton Place is defined by the overall design of the community. The following sections provide an overview of the
More informationStaff Report to the North Ogden City Planning Commission
Staff Report to the North Ogden City Planning Commission SYNOPSIS / APPLICATION INFORMATION Application Request: Concept review on a legislative application to rezone land located at approximately 1750
More informationNew-Cast Mixed-use Development Proposal King Street West, Newcastle, Ontario
URBAN DESIGN BRIEF New-Cast Mixed-use Development Proposal King Street West, Newcastle, Ontario TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1.0 Executive Summary 2.0 Creating Vibrant and Sustainable Urban Places: Excerpts from
More informationMark-up of the effect of the proposed Bronte Village Growth Area OPA No.18 on the text of section 24, Bronte Village, of the Livable Oakville Plan
Mark-up of the effect of the proposed Bronte Village Growth Area OPA No.18 on the text of section 24, Bronte Village, of the Livable Oakville Plan Notes: This document is provided for information purposes
More informationCITY OF SEATTLE ANALYSIS AND DECISION OF THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND LAND USE
City of Seattle Paul Schell, Mayor Department of Design, Construction and Land Use R. F. Krochalis, Director CITY OF SEATTLE ANALYSIS AND DECISION OF THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION
More informationCENTRAL CITY NEIGHBORHOOD Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist
Applicant s Name: Project Address: NEIGHBORHOOD Phone: Email: Applicant shall fill out the design guidelines checklist for all guidelines applicable to the project. Check the box if meets guideline. Indicate
More informationChapter 3: Office & Office Mixed-Use Project Types
Chapter Contents Purpose... 3-2 Applicability and Use Types...3-3 (1) Site Design...3-4 Building Placement and Orientation...3-5 Circulation and Vehicle Parking...3-6 Bicycle/Pedestrian Amenities...3-8
More informationSECTION 24 DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR LARGE COMMERCIAL AND RETAIL DEVELOPMENTS INTRODUCTION & PROCEDURE 24-2
1 SECTION 24 DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR LARGE COMMERCIAL AND RETAIL DEVELOPMENTS INTRODUCTION & PROCEDURE 24-2 Page # ARTICLE I. SITE DESIGN AND RELATIONSHIP TO COMMUNITY 1. Site Design 24-3 2. Multiple Stores/Structures
More informationchapter DESIGN GUIDELINES NEW RIVER MASTER PLAN REPORT
chapter DESIGN GUIDELINES NEW RIVER MASTER PLAN REPORT .76 DESIGN GUIDELINES An Overview design guidelines NEW RIVER MASTER PLAN Design Guidelines can transform the image of a city. Specific, design-based
More informationBUSINESS DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES
Des Plaines, Illinois Prepared for the City of Des Plaines by: The Lakota Group Laurie Marston, AICP March 2005 Section 5: Streetscape Elements Business District Design Guidelines STREETSCAPE ELEMENTS
More informationBuilding and Site Design Standards
Commercial Design Standards All Business and Industrial Uses as Described in Section 2234 Requiring Special Permit Review Except Large-Scale Ground Mounted Solar Photovoltaic Installations and Wireless
More informationUptown Rideau Street Secondary Plan [Amendment #166, January 12, 2016]
[Amendment #166, January 12, 2016] The policies of this Secondary Plan are in effect, save and except for the property at 560 Rideau Street, for which there remains a site specific appeal to this Secondary
More informationREZONING APPLICATION MPD SUPPLEMENT
REZONING APPLICATION MPD SUPPLEMENT For Staff Use Only: DATE/TIMESTAMP: ZA# RECEIVED BY: The intent of the Master Planned District (MPD) designation is to allow flexibility in the design and construction
More informationFuture Five. Design/ Development Guidelines. January 2008 Amended June 08 per City Council motion
Future Five Design/ Development Guidelines January 2008 Amended June 08 per City Council motion 5-Points Design Guidelines Table of Contents I. Introduction 3 II. Area boundaries 4 III. Review Process
More informationURBAN DESIGN BRIEF Gordon Street City of Guelph. Prepared on behalf of Ontario Inc. March 25, Project No. 1507
URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 1131 Gordon Street City of Guelph Prepared on behalf of 1876698 Ontario Inc. March 25, 2016 Project No. 1507 423 Woolwich Street, Suite 201, Guelph, Ontario, N1H 3X3 Phone (519) 836-7526
More information14 October 10, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT: MPB, INC
14 October 10, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT: MPB, INC PROPERTY OWNER: MUNDEN & ASSOCIATES, LP STAFF PLANNER: Karen Prochilo REQUEST: Conditional Change of Zoning (AG-1 & AG-2 to Conditional O-2) ADDRESS
More informationChapter 11. Industrial Design Guidelines 11.1 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE 11.3 SITE PLANNING GUIDELINES 11.2 GENERAL DESIGN OBJECTIVES
Chapter 11 Industrial Design Guidelines 11.1 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE The following industrial/design guidelines seek to assure high quality development in Santa Ana s industrial districts by: The design
More informationAMITY STATION Revised Concept Plan Review West Rosemary Street Chapel Hill, NC September 27, 2016
AMITY STATION Revised Concept Plan Review West Rosemary Street Chapel Hill, NC September 27, 2016 DEVELOPER'S PROGRAM Introduction This is a request for review of a Revised Concept Plan by Chapel Hill
More informationDEVELOPMENT CONTROLS MEDICAL DISTRICT
6.01. GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINES A. Site Planning B. Architectural Design C. Medical Facility Signage & Lighting D. Exhibit 48. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN CONCEPTS 6.02. MEDICAL FACILITY STANDARDS & GUIDELINES
More informationAppendix A COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Appendix A COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN DESIGN GUIDELINES INTRODUCTION The continuous and desirable improvement of Arnprior requires a clear understanding of what is envisioned for the Town. These Design
More informationII. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
II. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Castle Rock is made up of numerous individually built houses and subdivision tracts that have been developed during the past century. Some of the tracts are diverse in architectural
More informationDRAFT. 10% Common Open Space
% OF CHARLOTTE IS CATEGORIZED AS A. LAND USES : Placeholder map displaying location of Place Type GOALS: Accommodate XX% of future growth. Provide a concentration of primarily commercial and civic activity
More information