EXTRAORDINARY KAITAKE COMMUNITY BOARD

Transcription

1 AGENDA EXTRAORDINARY KAITAKE COMMUNITY BOARD Thursday 5 May 2016 at 5pm Plymouth Room, Civic Centre Chairperson: Mr Doug Hislop Members: Mr Paul Coxhead Mr Mike Pillette Mr Keith Plummer Cr Richard Jordan

2 Community Boards EXTRAORDINARY KAITAKE COMMUNITY BOARD THURSDAY 5 MAY 2016 Role of community boards (s52 Local Government Act 2002) a) represent, and act as an advocate for, the interests of its community; and b) consider and report on matters referred by the council and other matters of interest c) maintain an overview of services provided by the council within the community; and d) prepare an annual submission to the council for expenditure within the community; e) communicate with community organisations and special interest groups within the community; and f) undertake any other responsibilities that are delegated to it by the territorial authority. Addressing the community board Members of the public have an opportunity to address a community board during the public forum section or as a deputation. A public forum section of up to 30 minutes precedes all community board meetings. Each speaker during the public forum section of a meeting may speak for up to 10 minutes. In the case of a group a maximum of 20 minutes will be allowed. A request to make a deputation should be made to the secretariat within two working days before the meeting. The chairperson will decide whether your deputation is accepted. The chairperson may approve a shorter notice period. No more than four members of a deputation may address a meeting. A limit of 10 minutes is placed on a speaker making a presentation. In the case of a group a maximum of 20 minutes will be allowed. Purpose of Local Government The reports contained in this agenda address the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 in relation to decision making. Unless otherwise stated, the recommended option outlined in each report meets the purpose of local government and: Will help meet the current and future needs of communities for good-quality local infrastructure, local public services, and performance of regulatory functions in a way that is most cost-effective for households and businesses; Would not alter significantly the intended level of service provision for any significant activity undertaken by or on behalf of the Council, or transfer the ownership or control of a strategic asset to or from the Council. Extraordinary Kaitake Community Board Thursday 5 May 2016

3 EXTRAORDINARY KAITAKE COMMUNITY BOARD THURSDAY 5 MAY 2016 APOLOGIES None advised PUBLIC FORUM None advised. DEPUTATIONS None advised. A ITEM FOR DECISION BY KAITAKE COMMUNITY BOARD A1 MEMBERS ACTIVITY REPORT This report advises of the outcomes of the community engagement project to establish residents views on the future growth of the area defined in the Oakura Structure Plan. Extraordinary Kaitake Community Board Thursday 5 May 2016

4 EXTRAORDINARY KAITAKE COMMUNITY BOARD THURSDAY 5 MAY 2016 Extraordinary Kaitake Community Board Thursday 5 May 2016

5 ITEM FOR DECISION 1 ITEM A1 MEMBERS ACTIVITY REPORT PREPARED BY: WARD/COMMUNITY: Doug Hislop Kaitake Community Board DATE: 2 May 2016 FILE REFERENCE: ECM SUMMARY/OBJECTIVE This report advises of the outcomes of the community engagement project to establish residents views on the future growth of the area defined in the Oakura Structure Plan. RECOMMENDATION That having considered all matters raised in the report, the report be noted. APPENDICES Attachment: OAKURA A Growing Community The Oakura Engagement Project Report 2014/16 (ECM ) Plus appendices to the Attachment: 1. Oakura Structure Plan (ECM ) 2. Oakura a Growing Community Discussion Document (ECM ) 3. Community Responses (ECM ) Extraordinary Kaitake Community Board Thursday 5 May 2016

6 ITEM A1 2 ITEM FOR DECISION Extraordinary Kaitake Community Board Thursday 5 May 2016

7 OAKURA - A Growing Community The Oakura Community Engagement Project Report /16 A Kaitake Community Board Project

8 PREAMBLE Well before the start of this community engagement project, the New Plymouth District Council had already indicated an area on the outskirts of Oakura as being had also been signalling that the investment in the Oakura to New Plymouth sewage scheme would enable the village to grow to much larger than it currently is. Part of the purpose of this community engagement project was to test whether it was appropriate to grow the village to the size and at the rate shown in the FUD Planning Overlay. The very strong community feedback is that the village is; A. Not ready to grow to that size in the short or medium term, or in the foreseeable future, B. Demonstrating the need for staged growth, C. Preferring smart and targeted growth that takes into consideration the limitations on growth including; 1) changes to the special character of Oakura that would arise as a result of such rapid and widely spread expansion. 2) the size and location of the school and the current school roll, and There is a strong sense of growing Oakura in a sustainable way, through improving linkages between the beach, urban and rural areas and to the National Park, and by retaining the unique character and pristine environment of Oakura that is so well enjoyed by residents, visitors and tourists alike. therefore providing statutory weight to how the Oakura residents want their community to develop. The stewardship for this project rests with the Kaitake Community Board, working in collaboration with a wider focus group of interested and talented local people. The overriding theme of the project has been to determine the community issues rather than to provide solutions for them, as many are complex and challenging. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS expertise over a long period to enable us to reach this point. There have been many individuals and groups who have provided substantial input as well, too many to name but who must be acknowledged for their interest and commitment. to drive change in our community. During the lengthy period since instigation, our continuing exchanges have always been professional and meaningful. That invaluable support has enabled those of us with a genuine interest in the community to communicate amongst the wider public and ourselves in a constructive way to lead to sustainable, effective outcomes.

9 HISTORICAL CONTEXT knowledge from local communities of their landscape and their visions for its future. Population Growth appropriate lifestyle development. Sense of Place Infrastructure values. Economic Development growing climate, natural resources and high quality living environment. Recreation and Open Space district. Mana Whenua supported and implemented so that different management processes complement each other and enhance the coastal areas of the New Plymouth District. Coastal Hazards a sustainable approach to hazards and risk to create more informed, resilient and secure coastal communities. Environment outstanding landscape values whilst providing for appropriate growth and development. This plan described the process to implement the vision of the New the protection, use, management and development of land and resources in the local area. Consultation with the community and iwi groups, combined with the review of numerous reports and studies contributed to its

10 into the existing policy and plans of the council and other stakeholders, including the Department of Conservation (DoC) and Taranaki Regional Council (TRC).. opportunities to achieve these through the regulatory environment of the District Plan.... to be a vibrant and distinct community celebrating links from mountain to sea. That vision is still credible today. Our community with its key environmental components of the beach, the river and the ranges is treasured by residents, and is a treasure of the wider district and province. While this community boundary as being the Oakura River in the east, the Kaitake Ranges in the south, Ahu Ahu Road in the west and Oakura Beach in the north. Centres (instead of Central City). community views and preferences.

11 ENVIRONMENT Focus Group deliberations Work with landowners, other agencies, and Iwi to incentivise biodiversity maintenance and enhancement. Monitor those activities that may impact on the coastal environment, particularly from high numbers of day visitors. Protect the natural character of views. Retain a low built density environment. Review the width and associated regulation of the Coastal Policy Area. Submissions Support for: consolidation of the visual and recreational amenity values in this area. Better beach access along Messenger Terrace, including disabled access. The amenity value and special character of Matekai Park and its wetlands. The protection and maintenance of water quality in the Oakura River and streams that exit onto Oakura Beach. ecosystems and viable populations of native species.

12 DESTINATION Focus Group deliberations Balancing the lifestyle needs of the residents with attracting visitors to our community requires careful consideration. Submissions Support for: Upgrading and promoting the tracks on the Kaitake Ranges. being investigated in the Pouakai, Pukeiti area. Development of cycle tourism in the area. Maintaining the current public amenity as the most appropriate way to attract visitors. No support for increased commercial development on the beachfront.

13 GROWTH/INDUSTRY/TALENT Focus Group deliberations Further investigation is required to determine long term potential and constraints for residential growth. scale tract housing development of uniform housing types. Commercial activity demand and location to be further investigated. Protect existing character on beachfront and in CBD. Provide building set back from Oakura River. Submissions Support for: All future residential and commercial development to be guided by locally driven sustainable planning and management vision and prescription. access opportunities. Multi-generational residential complexes designed so that young families and elderly people live in close proximity and naturally come into close contact. Under-grounding all services. Permeable surfaces wherever possible. Investigating and encouraging alternative power supply initiatives. More comprehensive regulation of building design on and near the beachfront to preserve village character and view shafts.

14 COMMUNITY/CITIZENS Focus Group deliberations A fundamental cornerstone for Oakura is to maintain its village identity and character. Use a multi-faceted approach to the planning, design and management of public spaces. Continue to develop a walkable neighbourhood. Identify and mandate appropriate options for future trails and pathways for recreation pursuits and key connectivity between community facilities. Submissions Trails Support for: Bridle paths Cycleways Walkways Continued beach access by horse riders. Community Hub Support for: Community garden spaces in future urban developments. Welcoming public spaces to encourage a safe community. Further developing local health services. Multi Sports Hub Support for: The pony club to remain in its present location. Any future swimming pool development to be in proximity of the school. Further developing the amenity value of Corbett Park. Divergent responses about the need for a multi-sports hub, for and against. Do not support a sportsville development as most sports bodies are already well located.

15 Submissions School Support for: Improved cycle and pedestrian access for children to and from school. The school to remain as a full primary school (Years 1 to 8).

16 CENTRES Focus Group deliberations The highway through the CBD should not be just a line that connects two points. It needs to be developed as a road that invites travellers to stop. Provide better planned car-parking opportunities in and around the CBD and at other key amenities. Provide better pedestrian movement opportunities. to spend time. The role of streets has to be social as well as utilitarian. Provide a public toilet in the village centre, subject to design and development of surrounding streetscape to provide appropriate degree of privacy and visual amenity. CBD Submissions Support for: distance of commercial and community services to allow for housing types that suit, among others, the elderly. The planned provision of a public toilet in the village centre. No support for large scale or industrial type activities. described above. No support for the development of a second and competing CBD centre. Support for:

17 Better streetscape design in new urban developments. Better parking facilities at destination points in the community. intersection.

18 FINAL COMMENT From the considerable amount of feedback received we know residents choose to live here because of the lifestyle they have, value and wish to retain. Residents want to stay connected to each other and be engaged as builders of our future community rather than just consumers and critics. Our community resilience and unsustainable into the future. It is therefore essential growth must be all about improving the quality of life within the carrying capacity of our community and environment. PROJECT GROUP Keith Plummer Paul Coxhead Mike Pillette Matt Crabtree Norton Moller Matthew Ruakere Tari Norris Milou Barrett Allen Juffermans John Ardern APPENDICES PHOTOGRAPHIC IMAGES

19