L AND USE SUBAREA POLICY S.13.7
|
|
- Marianna Reynolds
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Staff Report to the Municipal Planning Board February 18, 2014 G M P I TEM # 6 ROSEMERE NEGHBORHOOD - FUTURE L AND USE SUBAREA POLICY S.13.7 Case Number GMP Applicant City of Orlando Requested Action City initiated GMP amendment to create Future Land Use Subarea Policy S.13.7 to allow office uses, address development standards, and establish transitions for certain property (+/ -2.0 ac. area) in the +/-22.5 ac. Rosemere Neighborhood. Recommendation Staff recommends approval, subject to conditions in staff report. Project Planners Jason Burton, AICP M-S Droege, AICP Updated: February 11, 2014 P RO J ECT DESCRIPTION The Rosemere Neighborhood is generally located south of E. Princeton St., north of E. New Hampshire Street, east of I-4, and west of N. Orange Avenue. Staff is proposing to create Future Land Use Element Subarea Policy S.13.7 in order to protect the predominately residential Rosemere neighborhood from non-residential encroachment and promote the retention of existing historic resources while creating an appropriate transition in uses between the commercial district on N. Orange Avenue and the Rosemere residential neighborhood. The proposed policy will encompass a +/-2.0 ac. transition area comprised of two sections and include the following sites: The western portion of 321 E. Harvard Street, 316 E. Harvard Street, 316/318 E. Yale Street, 320 E. Yale Street, the western portion of 1910 N. Orange Avenue, 317 E. Vanderbilt Street, 315 E. Vanderbilt Street, 316 E. Vanderbilt Street, and the western portion of 1800 N. Orange Avenue (See map on page 11). These sites all have the Residential Medium Intensity future land use designation and are zoned R -2B/T, excluding the western portion of 1800 N. Orange Avenue which is zoned R-3B/T and fronts along E. New Hampshire Street. No additional future land use or zoning changes are associated with this proposal. The Rosemere Neighborhood is situated within District 3 (Commissioner Robert Stuart). B A C KGROUND Rosemere is an older established neighborhood situated north of downtown Orlando and constitutes the eastern portion of College Park. First developed in the early 1920 s by Walter Rose, a prominent local developer, it is within walking distance to Florida Hospital and Loch Haven Park. Laid out in a grid pattern as part of the traditional city development pattern, Rosemere has tree-lined boulevards, narrow brick-paved streets, a wide variety of residential architectural styles that range from Mission to Ranch and
2 Page 2 eclectic neighborhood commercial along N. Orange Avenue. The neighborhood also encompasses the Rosemere Historic Residential District (National Register of Historic Places), portions of the Ivanhoe Village Main Street District and the North Orange Avenue Special Plan (/SP) and is in close proximity to the popular Gaston Edwards Park and Lake Ivanhoe. In early 2013, a neighborhood meeting was held to discuss applications to change the future land use on a +/-0.18 ac. single family residential property (320 E. Yale Street) from Residential Medium Intensity to Office Low Intensity and rezone the site from R-2B/T to O-1/T (GMP ; ZON ). At the neighborhood meeting, staff learned that there had been growing concerns about commercial intrusion into the residential area. An established antiques area, the North Orange Avenue s antique businesses have gradually been replaced, due to apparent market demand, by diverse uses including more intensive commercial uses such as bars and eating and drinking establishments. Certain establishments have impacted the neighborhood through overflow patron parking and after hours loitering. This situation has been compounded by recent improvements to the multilane N. Orange Avenue (FDOT) facility which has slightly reduced the number of onstreet parking spaces. Recognizing increasing conflicts between the residential and non-residential uses and the absence of a regulatory transition area, planning staff decided to engage in an area-wide study. Neighborhood meetings were held on October 10, 2013, November 12, 2013 and January 22, Looking west along E. Yale St. Single family residential (historical resources) in near view and I-4 in far distance. I-4 will be expanded and a noise wall will be built to attenuate impacts. Looking West Along E. Vanderbilt Street: Medical office in foreground (right) and residential neighborhood in far distance. This is a typical neighborhood view with tree lined boulevards, interconnecting sidewalks and brick streets. During the meetings, attendees identified the area s many positive attributes which include active neighboring, a variety of historic homes, affordable housing, interconnecting sidewalks, brick streets, expansive tree canopy, and the proximity to employment centers as well as recreation and commercial uses. Property owners also expressed concerns about the future expansion of I-4, the impacts from the Florida Hospital Health Village development, the growing proliferation of graffiti, noise and trash in the N. Orange Avenue area as well as inadequate area lighting Examples of graffiti and trash along E. Yale St.
3 Page 3 and the increased presence of homeless individuals, crime, and commercial parking in the residential neighborhood. Feedback from these meetings was used to develop the Future Land Use Subarea Policy S ANALYSIS Rosemere Neighborhood: Area-Wide Context According to Future Land Use Policy 1.7.2: Growth Management Plan amendments, rezones, and development proposals, including infill development and redevelopment within or adjacent to existing neighborhoods shall be reviewed for compatibility with existing uses and those of surrounding neighborhoods. Neighborhoods shall be protected from incompatible and intrusive land uses which negatively impact the visual appearance and functionality of the established neighborhood. The Rosemere neighborhood is generally situated south of E. Princeton Street, north of E. New Hampshire Street, east of Cornell Avenue and I-4, and west of N. Orange Avenue. Surrounding uses include commercial and medical office uses (Florida Hospital) to the north, multifamily residential (Lake Ivanhoe Shores Apartments), office and commercial to the south, I-4 and single family residential (College Park) to the west and N. Orange Avenue commercial, the Alden Road industrial area and Lake Formosa to the east. Surrounding future land uses and associated zoning districts are shown on maps found on pages There are two Future Land Use Subarea Policies that bisect the neighborhood and connect through to the surrounding areas: Future Land Use Subarea Policy S.13.1 and Future Land Use Subarea Policy S Future Land Use Subarea Policy S.13.1 states that: In order to protect residential neighborhoods from encroachment, the activity center, mixed use corridor and office areas shall not be permitted to expand. Future Land Use Subarea Policy S.13.5 encompasses the +/-121 ac. Florida Hospital Development of Regional Impact (DRI) area (aka Florida Hospital Health Village) and addresses PD zoning, design principles, maximum development capacity, and transportation connectivity. Certain sections of the policy will also apply to future development to be sited in the northern portion of the Rosemere neighborhood. Subarea Policy S.13.5 states that: Florida Hospital Health Village. This subarea, known as the Florida Hospital Health Village, is intended to be an urban, mixed-use, pedestrian and transit accommodating district incorporating the principles of traditional neighborhood design. Florida Hospital has undergone a comprehensive and integrated planning process, including establishment of a Development of Regional Impact (DRI), to meet the requirements for designation as an Urban Village as described in Future Land Use Policy The following policies shall apply to properties within the subarea which have the Urban Village Future Land Use designation. Other properties within the subarea shall be a part of the Health Village, but not subject to these policies. Subarea Policies: PD Zoning. Any initial zoning or rezoning shall be limited to the Planned Development (PD) zoning district. Design Principles. The Health Village is anchored by the Florida Hospital campus. To further the hospital s health care mission and provide opportunities for residents, employees and visitors to en-
4 Page 4 joy a healthy lifestyle, any PD shall include standards that emphasize the following design principles: 1. Overall development should be compact, pedestrian-friendly and mixed-use, while providing opportunities for residential, commercial, office and medical uses. 2. Overall densities should be sufficient to accommodate multi-modal transportation alternatives. 3. Pedestrian walkways and streetscapes should be safe, attractive and inviting to encourage walking, reduce the number and length of automobile trips, and conserve non-renewable energy resources. 4. Development should incorporate principles of green design to conserve natural resources. 5. Open space, parks, and plazas, whether public or private, should be distributed throughout the Health Village to create identity and provide opportunities for recreation or relaxation. 6. Buildings should have varied and interesting architecture while providing appropriate transitions to adjacent neighborhoods. Maximum Development Capacity. The amount of development allowed within the Health Village shall be: Land Use Type Base Development Capacity Hospital 2,198 beds Medical Office 1,663,226 sq. ft. General Office 221,760 sq. ft. Education 382,967 sq. ft. Retail 140,000 Hotel 463 rooms Multifamily Residential 874 dwelling units All Base Development Capacity shall be consistent with the Health Village DRI. The composite/overall density and intensity within the Health Village subarea shall not exceed 25 dwelling units per acre and 2.0 Floor Area Ratio, although individual portions of the Health Village may exceed these limitations. Any PD shall ensure that the properties located within the general boundaries of Princeton Street, Evans Street, Interstate 4, and Lakes Winyah and Estelle, are the properties whereon the highest densities and intensities within the Health Village are located. Further, any PD shall ensure that properties located within the following areas of the Health Village: (a) South of Princeton Street, (b) North of Evans Street extending to Lake Winyah, and (c) Along the shore of Lake Winyah extending to Winyah Drive, shall have density, intensity, height and impacts which are limited to levels compatible with adjoining residential neighborhoods. Transportation Connectivity. Any PD shall include standards and regulations that require multimodal transportation improvements and/or focused intersection improvements as the preferred methods for mitigating transportation impacts. Multimodal transportation improvements may include improvements to the sidewalk, bicycle and trail network, as well as street and transit improvements. To facilitate traffic calming, support commercial development, and maximize pedestrian convenience, any PD shall also include standards and regulations that encourage an interconnected street network, allow on-street parking, require appropriate way-finding signs and transit shelters where needed, and integrate any commuter rail facilities into the pedestrian, bicycle and transit network. Prior to implementation of Phase 2 of the DRI Development Order, the property owner shall work with the City to ensure that any transportation mitigation plans for addressing impacts to State roadway facilities in the Health Village are consistent with and support the overall mobility plan of the City's Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA).
5 Page 5 Rosemere Neighborhood: Periphery Areas The northern neighborhood boundary, south of E. Princeton Street, has office, commercial (vacant) and vacant land as well as Urban Activity Center and Urban Village future land use designations and AC-2 zoning with the Traditional City (/T) overlay and PD/T zoning (Florida Hospital Health Village). The (/T) Overlay District overlay is intended to establish urban design standards to perpetuate positive design elements, neighborhood preservation and the residential and commercial development patterns found within the pre-world War II Traditional City. A portion of this area is also impacted by Subarea Policy S.13.5 (see pages 3-4 for a discussion). The southern neighborhood boundary, north of E. New Hampshire Street, includes a duplex, multi-story Lighthouse Central Florida (non-profit), multistory condominium developments (Hampshire at Lake Ivanhoe and Wellesley Oaks Condominiums), parking area, a bar (The Imperial Wine Bar), offices, and commercial (Washburn Imports). This area has the Residential Medium Intensity and Mixed-Use Corridor High Intensity future land use designations and is zoned R-3B/T and MU-2/T/SP, respectively. (For a discussion of the SP designation, see below.) The western neighborhood boundary, east of I-4 and Cornell Avenue, functions as the back of the neighborhood, since no buildings fully front on Cornell Ave. or I-4 and north of Yale Street, only a sidewalk connects through to E. Princeton Street. As reported by residents, this area is often used for strolls and serves as an informal dog walking area. South of E. Yale Street, Cornell Avenue links to E. New Hampshire Street, which connects to the western portion of College Park. Elevated I-4 dominates the area which includes vacant land as well as single and multifamily developments. Excluding for an area to the north-west, this area has the Residential Medium Intensity future land use designation and is zoned R-2B/T and R-3B/T. The eastern neighborhood boundary or commercial corridor, west of North Orange Avenue, has a mixture of uses including medical and general offices and commercial. This area is formally separated from the residential neighborhood by Future Land Use Subarea Policy S.13.1 which runs north-south then transverses west in the northern portion of the neighborhood and prohibits expansion of the mixed-use corridor, activity center and office areas into the residential neighborhood. The eastern neighborhood boundary can be divided into three areas: A small northern area, just south of E. Princeton St., has the Urban Village future land use designation and PD/T zoning (Florida Hospital Health Village). Due south of this area, (excluding for one interior lot, along E. Yale Street, which has Office Low Intensity future land use and O-1/T zoning), is a mid-northern area with the Urban Activity Center future land use designation and AC-2/T zoning while the southern area has the Mixed-Use Corridor High Intensity future land use designation and MU-2/T/SP zoning. Future Land Use Subarea Policy S.13.5 addressing future Florida Hospital Health Village development also bisects this area. Actual FAR, building setbacks and building styles in the Urban Activity Center and Mixed Use Corridor areas vary, as does the location and extent of on-site parking. Building heights are generally below +/- 30 feet which is well below the permitted 100 foot building height. The core residential neighborhood which directly abuts this area to the west has far more restrictive development regulations. In the R-2B/T and R-3B/T zoning districts the maximum permitted building heights are 30 and 40 feet, respectively and the maximum FAR is (See page 9 for additional information). The SP zoning designation refers to the North Orange Avenue Special Plan (/SP) overlay. Created in 1991, the North Orange Avenue Special Plan (/SP) Overlay (LDC Section ) was established to address the mixeduse areas along North Orange Avenue between Highland Avenue and Yale Street, which, at that time, had evolved into an antique district. The purpose of the district is to recognize the area s antique shopping district
6 Page 6 and permit uses which complement the antique shopping district and maintain its pedestrian character through the massing, scale and orientation of the buildings. The Special Plan also prohibits eating and drinking establishments in excess of 100 seats (drive-through facilities are not permitted) and encourages uses compatible with an antique shopping district such as florists, music stores, apparel and accessory stores and miscellaneous shopping good stores. Rosemere Neighborhood: Historic District and Residential Core As detailed in Historic Preservation Element Policy 1.6.3: The City shall support historic preservation efforts in Nationally Designated Historic Districts and Landmarks as identified in the Historic Preservation Support Document, Figures HP-5 and HP- 6. Abutting I-4: Sidewalk north of E. Yale Avenue connecting to E. Princeton Avenue, popular for strolls and dog walks. The core of the neighborhood is mostly comprised of one and two story single family homes, interspersed with duplexes and a range of residential developments and typologies (ie: Colonial Apartments and Villas at Lake Ivanhoe Condominiums). A portion of the neighborhood was first platted in 1921 (Rosemere Subdivision). Within the residential neighborhood is the Rosemere Historic Residential District, which was placed on the National Register of Historic Places by the U.S. Department of the Interior on October 21, (The boundaries of the Rosemere Historic District are shown on page 10.) The area features college names for its streets, including Yale, Cornell and Harvard. Architectural styles represented in the district include American Foursquare, Bungalow, Colonial Revival, Dutch-Colonial Revival, Minimal Traditional, Mission, Modern Movement, Ranch and Tudor Revival. This area is also featured in the City of Orlando s 2014 Historic Preservation Board Calendar. Two Story Multifamily Buildings along E. Yale Street. Future Land Use and Zoning Excluding an area to the north-west which has the Urban Village future land use designation, the residential neighborhood has the Residential Medium Intensity future land use designation. (See maps on pages for additional information). As discussed, Future Land Use Subarea Policies S.13.5 and S.13.1 generally border the core residential areas (See pages 3-4 for a discussion of subarea policies). Excluding for an area in the north-west with PD/T zoning, residential properties in the Rosemere residential neighborhood are zoned R -2B or R-3B with the Traditional (/T) overlay. The R-2B zoning dis- Two Story Single Family Residential Structure along E. Vanderbilt Street.
7 Page 7 trict (One-to-Five Family Residential) is intended to conserve the general character of established neighborhoods which have developed over time as a mixture of single family homes, duplexes, small apartment buildings, garage apartments and accessory apartments. The R-3B zoning district, as part of the R-3B and R-3C Medium Intensity Development Districts, is intended to provide for flexibility in building and site design in locations where residential development or redevelopment is desired at a medium intensity. (See zoning map on page 20). Proposed Future Land Use Subarea Policy S.13.7 Pursuant to a land use analysis, historical review and community input, staff is proposing the creation of Future Land Use Subarea Policy S The policy addresses nine sites which are divided into a two transition areas (see maps and photos of subject properties on pages 11-21). The proposed Future Land Use Subarea Policy S.13.7 is as follows: S.13.7 In order to protect the Rosemere residential neighborhood from non-residential encroachment and promote the retention of existing historic resources while creating an appropriate transition in uses between the commercial district on N. Orange Avenue and the Rosemere residential neighborhood, the following shall apply: I) Existing residential buildings in the Residential Medium Intensity future land use designation may be converted to office uses subject to: a) Administrative master plan review to ensure compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood; b) Installation of a 6 foot high masonry wall along property lines which abut existing single family homes or duplexes. The appropriate bufferyard must be installed. c) Creation of cross-access easements to abutting office or commercial properties. New curb cuts will not be allowed if functional cross-access exists, or can be created. d) Screening of on-site parking, dumpsters, lighting and retention facilities from the public right-of-way and residential properties. e) Applicable development standards for the adopted zoning district. f) Change of use procedures consistent with the Land Development Code. g) Compliance with O-1 signage standards for a single office. h) Parking for such uses being allowed only in the rear and restricted to on-site residential and office uses only; and i) Where there are two lots in the transition area, the eastern lot abutting non-residential zoning must be converted to office uses before the western lot can be changed. II) Parking areas, existing as of the effective date of this policy and within the subarea policy area boundaries, are allowed to improve and are subject to Subpart I) a-e. III) Redevelopment proposals not consistent with this subarea policy must meet the standards of the adopted future land use category. Subarea Policy S.13.7 Areas The proposed northern Subarea Policy S.13.7 area, as shown on maps on pages 18-19, is comprised of the following sites: The western Residential Medium Intensity future land use portion of 321 E. Harvard Street {Grace Villa Assisted Living Facility (ALF)} and 316 E. Harvard Street (a generally unimproved parking
8 Page 8 area). The Grace Villa is a contributing historic structure and has split zoning with AC-2/T on the eastern portion of the site and R-2B/T on the western portion. The southern Subarea Policy area is comprised of 316/318 E. Yale Street, 320 E. Yale Street, the western Residential Medium Intensity Future Land Use portion (parking area) of 1910 N. Orange Avenue, 317 E. Vanderbilt Street, 315 E. Vanderbilt Street, 316 E. Vanderbilt Street, and the western Residential Medium Intensity future land use portion (parking area) of 1800 N. Orange Avenue site. Five of these seven sites have contributing historic structures while two sites serve as parking areas. The 321 E. Yale Street property, which has the Office Low Intensity future land use designation and O-1/T zoning, is developed with an office and serves as a link between the two subarea policy transition areas. Discussion of Proposed Future Land Use Subarea Policy S.13.7 Due to the important historical value of the existing homes, staff is proposing that the sites in this area retain their Residential Medium Intensity future land use designation and R-2B/T or R-3B/T zoning. Staff had initially considered Office Low Intensity future land use and O-1/T zoning as a possible transition along with shifting Subarea Policy S.13.1, which prohibits non-residential encroachment, to the west but considered that this change would create unintended consequences (ie: redevelopment at a larger scale and subsequent loss of historic structures). Sites that have existing residential structures may be converted to office uses subject to an administrative master plan review, change of use permitting requirements, installation of a six foot high masonry wall, appropriate screening to address impacts from lighting, parking, storm-water, creation of cross-access easements and the establishment of parking in the rear. This proposal is an appropriate adaptive reuse of historic structures and will stabilize the interface of the neighborhood and commercial district. Signage will be limited to O-1 signage standards for a single office (LDC Sec (a)). Work-live units will also be allowed. And as discussed with residents this new Subarea Policy provides the opportunity to convert from residential to office uses without a future land use change. Any new development in this Subarea Policy area must be consistent with the adopted future land use (and zoning regulations). Parking areas will be allowed to continue and at time of improvement follow certain standards outlined in the policy. No other zoning or future land use changes will be processed as part of this request to create Future Land Use Subarea Policy S Looking North along N. Orange Avenue
9 Page 9 Chart Showing Certain Future Land Use Designations and Zoning District Standards Future Land Use Designation/ Zoning Max. Density/ Intensity Min. Density/Intensity Uses Height ISR Residential Medium Intensity 30 du/ac/0.30 FAR; 12 du/ac; none Residential/*PRI R-2B/T 16 du/ac./0.30; none Residential/**PBU 30 ft R-3B/T 21 du/ac./0.30; 12 du./ ac./ none Residential/**PBU 40 ft./ 55 ft. w/cup 0.70 Both zoning districts have the same setbacks: 20 ft. front yard, 5 ft. side yard, 15 ft. street-side yard and 25 ft rear yard. *Public, Recreational & Institutional (PRI) & **Public Benefit Use (PBU). Future Land Use Designation/ Zoning Max. Density/ Intensity Min. Density/Intensity Uses Height ISR Urban Activity Center 100 du/ac./1.0 FAR; 30 du/ac./0.50 FAR Residential, Commercial, Industrial, Office & PRI AC-2/T 100 du/ac./1.0 FAR; 30 du/ac./0.50 FAR Residential, Commercial, Office, warehouse & PBU 100 ft 0.90 Future Land Use Designation/ Zoning Mixed Use Corridor -High Intensity Max. Density/ Intensity; Min. Density/ Intensity 200 du/ac./1.0 FAR; 30 du/ac./0.40 FAR Uses Height ISR Residential, Commercial, Office, & PRI MU-2/T/SP 75 du/ac./1.0 FAR; 30 du/ac./0.40 FAR (CUP: 200 du/ac.) Residential, Commercial, Office & PBU 100 ft Setback information for both zoning districts: See Figures 1STD2.LDC and 1STD3.LDC; also see Chapter 62, Sections.608/ Designation of Streets in mixed-use corridors and activity centers. Future Land Use Designation/ Zoning Office Low Intensity Max. Density/ Intensity; Min. Density/ Intensity 21du/ac/0.40; no minimum Uses Height ISR Office, Residential & PRI O-1/T 21du/ac/0.40; no minimum Office, Residential & PBU 30 ft Setbacks: 25 ft. front yard, 10 ft. side yard, 25 ft. street-side yard and 30 ft. rear yard. Other: Urban Village future land use designation and PD zoning: In the Urban Village designation, key development program/standards are established through an adopted future land use subarea policy and typically PD zoning. See Subarea Policy S.13.5 on pages 3-4. Also see Florida Hospital PD Ordinance Doc. Number:
10 Cornell Avenue N. Orange Ave. Page 10 The Rosemere Historic Residential District was placed on the National Register of Historic Places by the United States Department of the Interior on October 21, A small residential neighborhood, it was once directly connected to the much larger College Park neighborhood before being separated by the construction of Interstate Highway 4 in The National Register Historic District is an honorary designation and, unlike local historic districts, is not required to comply with the City s historic preservation regulations. Local historic districts are typically established through a petition process by property owners. Maps of the Rosemere Historic District and Proposed Subarea Policy S.13.7 I-4 Proposed Future Land Use Subarea Policy S.13.7 Areas I-4 E. Princeton Street E. Harvard Street E. Yale Street E. Vanderbilt Street E. New Hampshire Street
11 Page 11 Map Below Shows Location of Proposed Subarea Policy S Aerials (below and to the right) Show Approximate Location of S.13.7 Areas in yellow. E. Yale Street E. Vanderbilt Street
12 Page 12 Photos of Properties Parking Area Along E. New Hampshire Street (Policy area only addresses the Residential Medium Intensity future land use portion of the 1800 N. Orange Avenue property.) 316 E. Vanderbilt Street
13 Page 13 Photos of Properties 315 E. Vanderbilt Street and 317 E. Vanderbilt Street View of parking area This area includes walls, retention area and dumpster enclosure. Policy area only addresses the Residential Medium Intensity future land use portion of the platted 1910 N. Orange Avenue property.
14 Page 14 Photos of Properties 320 E. Yale and 316/318 E. Yale Street Another View of 320 E. Yale Street
15 Page 15 Photos of Properties Parking Area: 316 E. Harvard Street Grace Villas ALF (Policy area only addresses the Residential Medium Intensity future land use portion of the 321 E. Harvard Street site.)
16 Page 16 Images of the Proposed I-4 Expansion, Proposed Location of Noise Walls and a Portion of the North Orange Avenue Special Plan Proposed I-4 expansion to the left. Proposed noise walls to the right in red. North Orange Avenue Special Plan addresses a portion of the subject area. (See below.)
17 Page 17 Views of Portions of the Ivanhoe Village Main Street District and the Florida Hospital Health Village Illustrative Site Plan A Portion of the Ivanhoe Village Main Street District and the Rosemere Neighborhood Market Rate Residential Retail Retail (use will vary) Commuter Rail Office-Medical, General & Pt. Services Hospital Hotel Convention Parking Structures Church Long Term Acute Care Conference Center/Medical Spa Office Residential Hotel Florida Hospital Health Village Illustrative Site Plan (Source: ZON PD amendment.)
18 P age 18 Maps Showing Future Land Use Designations, Existing Subarea Policies and Proposed Subarea Policy S.13.7
19 Page 19 Maps Showing Existing Subarea Area Policies and Proposed Subarea Policy S.13.7
20 Page 20 Zoning Map of Subject Area-Zoning Map will not change Office Building (addressed as 321 E. Yale Street). This site (in foreground) has the Office Low Intensity future land use designation and O-1/T zoning. This site links the two areas of proposed Subarea Policy S.13.7.
21 Page 21 Aerial of General Area Showing Future Land Use and Zoning Map Showing Proposed Future Land Use Subarea Policy S.13.7
22 Page 22 F I N D I N G S Subject to the conditions contained herein, the GMP Future Land Use Element Subarea Policy S.13.7 amendment application (proposal) is consistent with the requirements for approval as noted below: 1. The proposal is consistent with the State Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 187, Florida Statutes). 2. The proposal is consistent with the East Central Florida Strategic Regional Policy Plan. 3. The proposal is consistent with the provisions of Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes. 4. The proposal is consistent with the objectives and policies of the City s adopted Growth Management Plan (GMP). 5. The proposal is consistent with all applicable requirements of the City s Land Development Code. 6. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding development pattern. SUMMARY Staff recommends approval of the GMP Future Land Use Element Subarea Policy S.13.7 amendment, subject to the conditions below. Conditions Comprehensive Planning 1. No office use conversion in the Future Land Use Subarea Policy S.13.7 areas can occur until the future land use amendment is effective as part of the 2014 Summer Cycle of GMP Amendments. 2. All office use conversions as well as improvements to parking areas in the Future Land Use Subarea Policy S.13.7 areas must have administrative master plan approval. Permit Review Information Building Plan Review 1. Building Plan Review is not applicable to this case at this time. Orlando Police Department 1. The Orlando Police Department has received initial documentation regarding a FLU subarea policy S.13.7 for property in the Rosemere Neighborhood. A complete CPTED plan review is not applicable to this project at this time. We encourage developers and property owners to incorporate CPTED strategies in their development or redevelopment projects. A brochure entitled Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design, Your Guide to Creating a Safe Environment is available on-line at: planning/cityplanning/policydocument/cpted_2008.pdf and includes crime prevention techniques for various land uses. Transportation Planning Division 1. The Transportation Planning Division supports the applicant s request. Contacts 1. For questions regarding Comprehensive Planning plan review, please contact MS Droege at or by mary-stewart.droege@cityoforlando.net 2. For questions regarding Transportation Planning plan review, please contact Gus Castro at or by gustavo.castro@cityoforlando.net 3. For questions regarding Orlando Police Department plan reviews, please contact Audra Nordaby at or Audra.Nordaby@cityoforlando.net. 4. For questions regarding Building Plan Review issues contact Don Fields at (407) or don.fields@cityoforlando.net.
E O L A F I V E. Location Map SUMMARY G M P Z O N I T E M S # 1 A. & B.
N. Eola Drive Staff Report to the Municipal Planning Board August 18, 2015 G M P 2 0 1 5-0 0 0 1 9 Z O N 2 0 1 5-00016 I T E M S # 1 A. & B. A N X 2 0 1 2-0 0 0 0 5 G M P 2 0 1 2-0 0 0 0 6 Z O N 2 0 1
More informationVIRGINIA DRIVE SPECIAL PLAN
August 15, 2017 Staff Report to the Municipal Planning Board CASE #GMP2017-10006 & LDC2017-00231 Item # 7 VIRGINIA DRIVE SPECIAL PLAN Location Map Subject Site SUMMARY Applicant City of Orlando, Planning
More informationARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts
ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts 6-10 Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) District 6-10.10 Purpose and Intent The Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) District provides
More informationIncentive Zoning Regulations Florida Municipal City of Orlando
Topic: Resource Type: State: Jurisdiction Type: Municipality: Year (adopted, written, etc.): 2002 Community Type applicable to: Title: Incentive Zoning Regulations Florida Municipal City of Orlando Document
More information4.1.3 LAND USE CATEGORIES
4.1.3 LAND USE CATEGORIES a. City Center District The City Center District incorporates the existing character and mix of uses in downtown Belmont to encourage redevelopment and new development in keeping
More informationCHARLES PUTMAN CHARLES PUTMAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC
MEMORANDUM CHARLES PUTMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS PLANNING ZONING PERMITTING 4722 NW Boca Raton Boulevard, Suite C-106 Boca Raton, Florida 33431 Phone: 561/994-6411 FAX: 561/994-0447
More informationPolicies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center
Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center The Town Center Vision is scattered throughout the Comprehensive Plan, development code and the 1994 Town Center Plan. What follows are sections
More informationGold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan
Appendix F Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan Introduction and Purpose of the Plan The Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit facility is an eleven-mile dedicated
More information3.0 URBAN DESIGN. December 6, OVERVIEW
Urban Design 3.0 URBAN DESIGN December 6, 2007 3.1 OVERVIEW The highly urban character of Easton Place is defined by the overall design of the community. The following sections provide an overview of the
More informationTown Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)
Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan) Mercer Island Town Center Looking North (2014) In 1994, a year-long process culminated in a set of design guidelines and code requirements for the Town Center
More informationEXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Town Center Land Use Element: V. LAND USE POLICIES Town Center Mercer Island's business district vision as described in "Your Mercer Island Citizen-Designed Downtown" was an
More informationMetro. Activity Center Design Guidelines. Recommendations For Developing Focused, Mixed-Use Commercial/Residential Centers
Metro Activity Center Design Guidelines Recommendations For Developing Focused, Mixed-Use Commercial/Residential Centers Metro Activity Centers What is a MAC? Legacy, the adopted guide for the future growth
More informationDENVER DESIGN DISTRICT GDP
DENVER DESIGN DISTRICT GDP Urban Design Standards and Guidelines November 17, 2008 Amended February 3, 2016 City and County of Denver CF Property Management, Inc. C/O Denver Design District - Starboard
More information4. Shape Transitions. 4. Shape Transitions
4. Shape Transitions 49 Zoning District Policies Overall Intent: Maintain neighborhood character by creating compatible transitions that minimize land use conflicts. Strategy: Define the character of zoning
More informationLehigh Acres Land Development Regulations Community Planning Project
Lehigh Acres Land Development Regulations Planning Effort Summary In July, 2010 Commissioner Frank Mann invited the Lehigh Acres community to start discussing how to achieve their recently adopted community
More informationMIXED-USE VILLAGE OVERLAY FLOATING DISTRICT
MIXED-USE VILLAGE OVERLAY FLOATING DISTRICT Zoning regulations developed by committee to the Planning Board for the Town of DeWitt, NY Issue date: 13 July 2017 revised 3/12/2018, revised 4/26/2018, 5/9/2018
More informationMidtown Greenway Land Use and Development Plan Executive Summary
Midtown Greenway Land Use and Development Plan Executive Summary Introduction The Midtown Greenway Land Use and Development Plan sets policy direction for land use and development in the Midtown Greenway
More informationSECTION UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE SECTION Part 1 Ordinance. ARTICLE 1 Zoning Districts
SECTION 1-100 UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE SECTION 1-300 Part 1 Ordinance SECTION 1-100. Introduction. ARTICLE 1 Zoning Districts Crystal Lake strives to maintain a balance of various land uses for a
More informationCHAPTER 1. Ms. Guajardo s Class - Central Elementary CH 1 1
INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 1 Ms. Guajardo s Class - Central Elementary CH 1 1 1.1 SETTING South Centre City is a linear corridor south of Downtown Escondido paralleling Centre City Parkway and South Escondido
More informationPlanning Commission April 4, 2013 BOCC Workshop Page 1
Planning Commission April 4, 2013 BOCC Workshop Page 1 Planning Commission April 4, 2013 BOCC Workshop Page 2 Planning Commission April 4, 2013 BOCC Workshop Page 3 Planning Commission April 4, 2013 BOCC
More informationUrban Development Areas Bedford County
5 Urban Development Areas Bedford County UDA Needs Profile: All UDAs Bedford County has designated two UDAs: areas just outside the Bedford City Limits (generally to the south and east of the city) and
More informationCITY OF TARPON SPRINGS DCA#11-1AR
Agenda Item #3.H.2 05/09/11 TAMPA BAY REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ADOPTED AMENDMENT REPORT CITY OF TARPON SPRINGS DCA#11-1AR 1 ADOPTED WITH THE FOLLOWING CHANGES: Ordinance
More informationEXHIBIT A. Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 1 (Town Center) First Amended Project Plan 1
EXHIBIT A Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 1 (Town Center) First Amended Project Plan 1 1 As amended by Resolution No. 2008-02-001(TR1R) of the Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No.1, and approved to
More informationAWH REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
AWH REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MAY 8, 2014 The Planning and Development Department hereby forwards to the Planning
More informationURBAN DESIGN BRIEF. 2136&2148 Trafalgar Road. Town of Oakville
URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 2136&2148 Trafalgar Road Town of Oakville Prepared By: METROPOLITAN CONSULTING INC For 2500674 Ontario Inc November 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. 1.0 Introduction/Description of Subject
More informationMobility Districts and Traffic Studies
Mobility Districts and Traffic Studies During the last Comprehensive Plan update in 2008, the City of Sarasota identified the need to develop a citywide strategy for enhancing the mobility options of all
More informationBe it enacted by the Town Board of the Town of Guilderland that the following new A (Transit Oriented Development (TOD) District) is adopted:
Local Law No. 4 of 2018 (Adoption of 280-18A (Transit Oriented Development District) Be it enacted by the Town Board of the Town of Guilderland that the following new 280-18A (Transit Oriented Development
More informationA P P E N D I X B - O P P O R T U N I T Y S I T E S
A P P E N D I X B - O P P O R T U N I T Y S I T E S OPPORTUNITY SITES As listed in the Land Use Element, the City has identified 15 Opportunity Sites expected to be the focus of change and revitalization
More informationS A C R A M E N T O C O U N T Y JACKSON HIGHWAY & GRANT LINE EAST VISIONING STUDY
JACKSON HIGHWAY & GRANT LINE EAST S A C R A M E N T O C O U N T Y P L A N N I N G D E P A R T M E N T SUMMARY AND WORKBOOK November 19, 2008 History of the Visioning Study Sacramento County has two growth
More informationAppendix C: Interim Mixed-Use Evaluation Criteria
Appendix C: Interim Mixed-Use Evaluation Criteria C-1 Appendix C: Interim Mixed-Use Evaluation Criteria PURPOSE: The implementation of numerous policies contained within the Master Plan hinges on the creation
More informationPINE CURVE REZONING. Property does not meet criteria for open space preservation and is not a candidate for a park
PINE CURVE REZONING BACKGROUND Purchased as two parcels in 2001 and 2002 Annexed and Zoned Greater Downtown District Historic Center September 25, 2002 and October 7, 2002 WHAT THE PROJECT IS AND IS NOT
More informationSPRINGHILL LAKE TRANSIT VILLAGE
Greenbelt Metro Area Sector Plan - Subarea Design Policies and Guidelines - Springhill Lake Transit Village 113 SPRINGHILL LAKE TRANSIT VILLAGE Residential Neighborhood and Village Center CONCEPT Springhill
More informationREPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AUGUST 18, 2016
REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AUGUST 18, 2016 AWH The Planning and Development Department hereby forwards to the Planning
More informationand services The protection and conservation of environmentally significant and sensitive natural heritage features and functions.
6. Land Use 6.0 Preamble A healthy and livable city is one in which people can enjoy a vibrant economy and a sustainable healthy environment in safe, caring and diverse neighbourhoods. In order to ensure
More informationCONTENTS 8.0 LAND USE 8.1 GENERAL LAND USE 8.2 RESIDENTIAL 8.3 MIXED USE 8.4 COMMERCIAL 8.5 EMPLOYMENT LANDS
8-2 Land Use 8.0 LAND USE CONTENTS 8.1 GENERAL LAND USE 8.1.1 Uses provided for in all Land Use Designations 8.1.2 Uses prohibited in Hazardous Lands, Hazardous Sites and Special Policy Areas 8.1.3 Uses
More informationPlanning & Zoning Commission Staff Report
Planning & Zoning Commission Staff Report Meeting Date: May 26, 2015 Drafted by: Katherine Harrison-Rogers CASE # Z2886 PROJECT NAME: APPLICANT/ REPRESENTATIVE: Shawna Runyan PROPERTY OWNER: 1840 (previously
More information3.10 LAND USE SETTING PROJECT SITE EXISTING LAND USE DESIGNATIONS AND ZONING. General Plan Land Use Designations.
This section of the Draft EIR addresses the existing land uses on and adjacent to the project site and discusses the potential impacts of the proposed project on existing land uses. Key issues addressed
More informationThe transportation system in a community is an
7 TRANSPORTATION The transportation system in a community is an important factor contributing to the quality of life of the residents. Without a sound transportation system to bring both goods and patrons
More informationEstablishment of Zoning Districts
CHAPTER 6 Establishment of Zoning Districts 6. Section 601 Zoning by Districts: In accordance with the provisions of LUDMA that allows the Council to divide the area of the Town into Zoning Districts,
More informationPINE CURVE REZONING. BACKGROUND Purchased as two parcels in 2001 and 2002
BACKGROUND Purchased as two parcels in 2001 and 2002 WHAT THE PROJECT IS AND IS NOT A Rezoning establishes the land use standards for Annexed and Zoned Greater Downtown District Historic Center September
More informationBARBER PARK CUP. Staff Report to the Municipal Planning Board April 18, 2017 I TEM # 1. Location Map. Subject Site
Staff Report to the Municipal Planning Board April 18, 2017 C U P 2 0 1 7-0 0 0 0 3 I TEM # 1 BARBER PARK CUP Location Map Subject Site S U M M A RY Owner Michael Statham, Project Manager Orange County
More information2136 & 2148 Trafalgar Road Town of Oakville Region of Halton
PLANNING JUSTIFICATION REPORT 2136 & 2148 Trafalgar Road Town of Oakville Region of Halton Zoning By-Law Amendment Application 2500674 Ontario Inc. November 2016 Table of Contents Page 1.0 Location/Summary
More informationSubarea 4 Indian Creek. Vision The combination of park networks and transportation amenities make Subarea 4 the greenest hub in the Corridor.
indian creek 180 extends south from 101st Street to I-435. The I-435 and Metcalf intersection is one of the primary intersections in the Kansas City Metro Area. The area includes several residential neighborhoods
More informationORDINANCE WHEREAS, this Ordinance is consistent with the City of Winter Garden Comprehensive Plan; and
ORDINANCE 17-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER GARDEN, FLORIDA, CREATING ARTICLE XIV OF CHAPTER 118 OF THE CITY OF WINTER GARDEN CODE OF ORDINANCES PROVIDING FOR THE EAST PLANT
More information178 Carruthers Properties Inc.
178 Carruthers Properties Inc. Planning Rationale for 178 Carruthers Avenue Site Plan Control Application June 2014 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Overview of Subject Property 3.0 Current Zoning
More informationA. Background Summary of Existing Challenges and Potential Possibilities. 1. Summary of Existing Assets and Potential Opportunities
A. Background 1 A Main Street Master Plan Study was performed and completed in October of 2007. The study was initiated to review current land uses and development patterns along Main Street, from Parrish
More informationSmall Area Plan. South Gateway
Small Area Plan Adopted May 12, 2008 South Gateway Purpose. The South Gateway Small Area Plan defines the City s expectations for the future of the southern entrance to the City at Interstate 85 and Highway
More informationNarcoossee Roadway Corridor
Community Meeting Narcoossee Roadway Corridor April 5, 2012 Meeting Agenda Purpose of Meeting Continuation of Study Update Process (Previous Meetings Oct. & Nov., 2011) Tonight s Objective Review Proposals
More informationURBAN DESIGN BRIEF URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 721 FRANKLIN BLVD, CAMBRIDGE August 2018
URBAN DESIGN BRIEF URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 721 FRANKLIN BLVD, CAMBRIDGE August 2018 DESIGN BRIEF CONTENTS PART A 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 DESCRIPTION & ANALYSIS OF SITE CONTEXT 3.0 DESIGN CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES
More informationREDLANDS TRANSIT VILLAGES SPECIFIC PLAN
REDLANDS TRANSIT VILLAGES SPECIFIC PLAN CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION JANUARY 4, 2019 Redlands Blvd. Eureka St. Orange St. State St. Citrus Ave. Vine St. GENERAL PLAN TRANSIT VILLAGES WE ARE HERE SPECIFIC
More informationTRANSPORTATION ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES GOAL 2 The City shall provide a safe, convenient, effective, and energy efficient multimodal transportation system which is coordinated with the Future
More information17.11 Establishment of Land Use Districts
17.11 Establishment of Land Use Districts 17.11.010 Purpose. To promote the health, safety, and general welfare of City residents and those who come to South Salt Lake to work, exchange commerce and recreate.
More informationGUIDELINES. Transit Oriented Development. Approved by Edmonton City Council on February 15, 2012 in tandem with City Policy C565
Transit Oriented Development GUIDELINES Prepared by the City of Edmonton Sustainable Development and Transportation Services Departments Approved by Edmonton City Council on February 15, 2012 in tandem
More information... the real city lives on... Character Area 5: LOWER WASHINGTON
... the real city lives on... Character Area 5: LOWER WASHINGTON 89 Boundaries This area is bordered by the extension of Fair Way to the north, the Napa River to the south, Gerard Street/Fire Station parking
More informationTable of Contents. Elm Avenue Improvement Plan City of Waco, Texas. Introduction 1. Existing Context 1 Figure 1 2.
Table of Contents Introduction 1 Existing Context 1 Figure 1 2 Plan Guidelines 3 Future Urban Form 4 The West-End 4 Main Street 6 The East-End 7 Figure 2 9 Public Improvement Recommendations 7 General
More informationFUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT
FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT GOAL I: To create and sustain a great place to live, play, and prosper Objective 1: The City of Ocala shall incorporate the principles and strategies of the Ocala 2035 Vision into
More informationCHAPTER 3. Design Standards for Business, Commercial, Industrial, Recreational and Institutional Uses
CHAPTER 3 Design Standards for Business, Commercial, Section Number Title Ordinance Number Date of Ordinance 16-3-1 Applicability 2006-11 2008-04 07-01-08 16-3-2 Uniform Standards for Architectural Design
More information, C-MS I June 3, 2016 $1500 pd chk #216918
, C-MS-8 LOTS 21 THROUGH 40, INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 299 CLEMENTS ADDITION TO THE CITY OF DENVER SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 68 WEST, SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY
More information2. Form and Character. 2.1 Introduction. 2.2 The Downtown Addition Plan. 2.1 Introduction
2.1 Introduction 2.1 Introduction This section of the Specific Plan describes and illustrates the desired form, character and uses of the Downtown Addition and explains the underlying design principles.
More informationTRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PINELLAS COUNTY MPO LIVABLE COMMUNITIES INITIATIVE PINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS
PINELLAS COUNTY MPO LIVABLE COMMUNITIES INITIATIVE MODEL LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS MPO Livable Communities Initiative Goal: Improve
More informationSDOT DPD. SDOT Director s Rule DPD Director s Rule DCLU DR SED DR of 7 CITY OF SEATTLE
SDOT SDOT Director s Rule 2-07 DPD Applicant: CITY OF SEATTLE Page 1 of 7 Supersedes: DCLU DR 11-93 SED DR 93-4 Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT) Department of Planning and Development (DPD)
More informationHighland Village Green Design Guidelines
Highland Village Green Design Guidelines Publishing Information Title Highland Village Green Design Guidelins Author The City of Calgary Status DRAFT - Proposed document subject to changes Additional Copies
More informationDRAFT Land Use Chapter
Stevens Creek Urban Village DRAFT 1 18 17 Land Use Chapter INTRODUCTION This Land Use Chapter describes how the Stevens Creek Urban Village will accommodate the growth that is planned for it in the Envision
More informationSECTION TWO: Urban Design Concepts
SECTION TWO: Urban Design Concepts The Gardnerville Plan for Prosperity shapes economic opportunities presented by regional growth. The Urban Design Concepts provide policies and concepts for land use,
More informationR E S O L U T I O N. Single-Family Residence/ Church. 2,488 sq. ft. 2,488 sq. ft. Area Parking Required: Church
R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, the Prince George s County Planning Board is charged with the approval of Detailed Site Plans pursuant to Part 3, Division 9 of the Zoning Ordinance of the Prince George s
More informationPOLICY AMENDMENT AND LAND USE AMENDMENT TUXEDO PARK (WARD 9) CENTRE STREET N AND 26 AVENUE NE BYLAWS 36P2017 AND 234D2017
Page 1 of 11 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This application proposes to redesignate a single parcel of land in the Community of Tuxedo Park from Commercial Corridor 2 (C-COR2 f1h10) District to Mixed Use Active Frontage
More information6 PORT SYDNEY SETTLEMENT AREA
Section 6 Port Sydney Page 61 6 PORT SYDNEY SETTLEMENT AREA 6.1 Basis and Principles Village of Port Sydney Waterfront Community Existing Services 6.1.1 Port Sydney is an historic settlement that has developed
More informationLAND USE OVERVIEW WHAT YOU WILL FIND IN THIS CHAPTER
LAND USE WHAT YOU WILL FIND IN THIS CHAPTER Information about the City s expected population and employment growth. Description and capacity of existing and future land use designations. Policies that
More informationCHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation
AGLE AREA COMMUNITY Plan CHAPTER 7 CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation Transportation, Mobility and Circulation The purpose of the Transportation, Mobility and Circulation Chapter is to
More informationPLAN ELEMENTS WORKSHOP. April 5, 2016
PLAN ELEMENTS WORKSHOP April 5, 2016 needs more housing. But there is no one-size fits-all solution. Every neighborhood has its own character. In some places, density is not only appropriate it is badly
More informationDEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Planning Division m e m o r a n d u m
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Planning Division m e m o r a n d u m TO: Urbana Plan Commission FROM: Kevin Garcia, Planner II DATE: October 6, 2017 SUBJECT: Plan Case Nos. 2314-PUD-17 and
More informationRESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS The residential district standards have been revised to reflect on-the-ground conditions, while continuing to respect the use patterns established within the neighborhoods. This will
More informationChapter 10 IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS
Chapter 10 IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS The recommended land use plan presented in the previous chapter provides a design for the attainment of the urban and rural development and open space preservation
More informationLocation Map GMP Amendment and Rezoning Area and CUP Area
S. Terry Avenue Chapman Court S. Division Avenue Staff Report to the Municipal Planning Board December 15, 2015 GMP2015-00029 ZON2015-00026 CUP2015-00018 Item # 12. A, B & C ORLANDO UNION RESCUE MISSION
More informationSeneca Meadows. Block 4 Locate office, technology, and medical development adjacent to I Screen views of garage structures from I-270.
Seneca Meadows Seneca Meadows has an industrial park in its southern end and a mixed-use employment area planned for the north end. The district benefits from extensive I-270 visibility, stream valley
More informationStatus Report: MD 355 Project
Status Report: MD 355 Project OCTOBER 2006 M-NCPPC MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Summary of Community Comments, and break to the Results of the MD 355 Participation Session Brookside Gardens -
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRAFT CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Through the joint efforts of the City of Tulsa planning staff and the Land Services division of Indian Nations Council of Governments (INCOG), the Berryhill Land
More information2.0 AREA PLANS. Lakeside Business District. Lakeside Business District Land Use Categories:
Lakeside Business District Lakeside Business District Land Use Categories: Campus Commercial Campus Commercial means a mixture of uses which includes corporate offices, office parks, hotels, commercial,
More informationKEIZER STATION PLAN INTRODUCTION
KEIZER STATION PLAN INTRODUCTION Planning for this area began in 1987 when the Keizer Comprehensive Plan established the Chemawa Activity Center and McNary Activity Center. The first Chemawa Activity Center
More informationComplete Neighbourhood Guidelines Review Tool
Complete Neighbourhood Guidelines Review Tool Prepared By: City of Regina Planning Department October 2014 Page 1 of 14 Community Development Review Checklist for Secondary Plans and Concept Plans The
More informationBROOKHILL NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL ZONING MAP AMENDMENT PREFACE TO APPLICATION
BROOKHILL NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL ZONING MAP AMENDMENT PREFACE TO APPLICATION June 15, 2015 Revised: August 1, 2016 I. VISION Brookhill is a proposed community based upon the principles of Albemarle County
More informationPlanned Development Review Revisions (Project No. PLNPCM )
Planned Development Review Revisions (Project No. PLNPCM2014-00139) Standard residential development Planned Development Example: Smaller lot sizes than what is allowed to create open space amenity. What
More informationFurther input invited as Colchester Growth Strategy nears final phase
IUE 3 / NOVEMBER 2015 Further input invited as Colchester Growth trategy nears final phase trathcona County is seeking public feedback as it enters the final phase of work on a Growth Management trategy
More informationELMVALE ACRES SHOPPING CENTRE MASTER PLAN
ELMVALE ACRES SHOPPING CENTRE MASTER PLAN Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 2 2.0 LOCATION... 2 3.0 EXISTING CONTEXT... 2 4.0 VISION & GUIDING PRINCIPLES... 2 5.0 LAND USE AND BUILT FORM... 4 5.1 St. Laurent
More informationThe broad range of permitted and special uses allowed in the district remain, but some descriptions have been clarified.
Memorandum To: Emily Fultz, AICP City Planner, City of Edwardsville From: Michael Blue, FAICP Principal, Teska Associates Date: January 24, 2019 RE: B-1 Zoning District Update A draft, updated B-1 Central
More informationB L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development
B L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development Adopted June 18, 2009 This section of the Design and focuses on site planning and design guidance for new multi-family
More information[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
1-1 LAND USE [THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 7 1-1. GOAL: TO DEVELOP AND MAINTAIN A WELL-BALANCED COMMUNITY WITH A VARIETY OF LAND USES THAT ARE COMPATIBLE WITH EACH
More informationNORTH COLLEGE PARK. Residential Neighborhood and Neighborhood Center OBJECTIVES EXISTING SITUATION AND ISSUES CONCEPT
Greenbelt Metro Area Sector Plan - Subarea Design Policies and Guidelines - North College Park 119 NORTH COLLEGE PARK Residential Neighborhood and Neighborhood Center CONCEPT North College Park is envisioned
More informationTREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 5H
TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 5H From: Date: Subject: Staff October 17, 2008 Council Meeting Local Government Comprehensive Plan Review Draft
More information3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3.1 BACKGROUND Under California law (Government Code Section 65300 et seq.), every city and county is required to have a general plan. The general plan is to be comprehensive and
More informationE. RURAL COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL PARK MODEL
E. RURAL COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL PARK MODEL 1. PURPOSE The purpose of the Rural Commerce/Industrial Park Model is to provide parameters within which a grouping of business buildings with parking, loading
More informationNew-Cast Mixed-use Development Proposal King Street West, Newcastle, Ontario
URBAN DESIGN BRIEF New-Cast Mixed-use Development Proposal King Street West, Newcastle, Ontario TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1.0 Executive Summary 2.0 Creating Vibrant and Sustainable Urban Places: Excerpts from
More informationStaff Report to the North Ogden City Planning Commission
Staff Report to the North Ogden City Planning Commission SYNOPSIS / APPLICATION INFORMATION Application Request: Concept review on a legislative application to rezone land located at approximately 1750
More informationDRAFT ROOSEVELT ROAD. District Recommendations. Figure 5.23 The Roosevelt Road Corridor
CHAPTER 5 Figure 5.23 The Road Corridor Road will develop as a mixed-use corridor, emphasizing regional retail, west of the river and mixed-use development east of the river. KEY RECOMMENDATIONS 1. High
More informationSheridan Boulevard S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N S H E R I D A N B O U L E VA R D S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N
Sheridan Boulevard S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N 1 City of Lakewood Adopted November, 2006 S H E R I D A N B O U L E VA R D S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N The Vision The City of Lakewood s overall vision is
More informationOsceola County Board of County Commissioners 1 Courthouse Square, Suite 1100 Kissimmee, FL
1/10/11 Item Number DRI08-0006 Osceola County Board of County Commissioners 1 Courthouse Square, Suite 1100 Kissimmee, FL 34741 407-742-0200 Applicant & Owner Center Lake Properties, LLLP and Formally
More informationA Context-Based Design Code for Pedestrian & Transit-Oriented Development RAIL~VOLUTION NOVEMBER 2006
A Context-Based Design Code for Pedestrian & Transit-Oriented Development RAIL~VOLUTION NOVEMBER 2006 Palo Alto Zoning Ordinance Update. Project Overview City of Palo Alto Palo Alto Zoning Ordinance Update.
More informationUrban Design Brief. Watson Parkway North & Watson Road North Guelph, Ontario. Prepared by Coletara Development
Urban Design Brief Watson Parkway North & Watson Road North Guelph, Ontario Prepared by Coletara Development December, 2013 Urban Design Brief, Coletara Development 1 Introduction This Urban Design Brief
More information6. REGIONAL AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES DESIGNATIONS 6.1. OBJECTIVES FOR REGIONAL AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
6. REGIONAL AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES DESIGNATIONS INTRODUCTION The Regional and land use designations provide the primary locations for uses which satisfy the health, education and other service needs
More information3.0 LAND USE PLAN. 3.1 Regional Location. 3.2 Existing Conditions Existing Uses. Exhibit Regional Location Map
3.0 LAND USE PLAN 3.1 Regional Location The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (ARSP) area is located in the City of Anaheim, which is 35 miles southeast of downtown Los Angeles and 7 miles northwest of Santa
More information