Farmland Classification
|
|
- Amberlynn Ford
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 Not prime farmland 100, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 All areas are prime farmland 100 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 All areas are prime farmland 100 4A Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3 Prime farmland if drained 100 5A Wayland soils complex, 0 to 3, Not prime farmland 100 frequently flooded 12D Rockrift channery silt loam, 15 to 25 Not prime farmland F Rock outcrop-arnot complex, 25 to 70 Not prime farmland D Cadosia channery silt loam, 15 to 25 Not prime farmland A Guyanoga channery silt loam, fan, 0 to 3 All areas are prime farmland B Guyanoga channery silt loam, fan, 3 to 8 All areas are prime farmland A Almond channery silt loam, 0 to 3 Prime farmland if drained B Almond channery silt loam, 3 to 8 Farmland of statewide importance C Almond channery silt loam, 8 to 15 Farmland of statewide importance A Homer fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 Prime farmland if drained A Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic, Typic Argiaquolls, Not prime farmland to 3 20A Atherton and Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic, Typic Not prime farmland 100 Argiaquolls, 0 to 3 24A Howard gravelly loam, 0 to 3 All areas are prime farmland B Howard gravelly loam, 3 to 8 All areas are prime farmland C Howard gravelly loam, 8 to 15 Farmland of statewide importance D Howard soils, 15 to 25 Not prime farmland A Chenango gravelly loam, 0 to 3 All areas are prime farmland B Chenango gravelly loam, 3 to 8 All areas are prime farmland C Chenango gravelly loam, 8 to 15 Farmland of statewide importance D Chenango gravelly loam, 15 to 25 Not prime farmland E Chenango gravelly loam, 25 to 35 Not prime farmland B Chenango channery loam, fan, 3 to 8 All areas are prime farmland B Castile gravelly silt loam, 3 to 8 All areas are prime farmland A Collamer silt loam, 0 to 3 All areas are prime farmland B Collamer silt loam, 3 to 8 All areas are prime farmland C Collamer silt loam, 8 to 15 Farmland of statewide importance D Collamer silt loam, 15 to 25 Not prime farmland A Dunkirk fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 All areas are prime farmland B Dunkirk fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 All areas are prime farmland A Dunkirk silt loam, 0 to 3 All areas are prime farmland B Dunkirk silt loam, 3 to 8 All areas are prime farmland C Dunkirk silt loam, 8 to 15 Farmland of statewide importance D Dunkirk silt loam, 15 to 25 Not prime farmland E Dunkirk silt loam, 25 to 35 Not prime farmland A Lakemont silty clay loam, 0 to 3 Farmland of statewide importance A Odessa silt loam, 0 to 3 Prime farmland if drained B Odessa silty clay loam, 3 to 8 Prime farmland if drained A Schoharie silty clay loam, 0 to 3 All areas are prime farmland B Schoharie silty clay loam, 3 to 8 All areas are prime farmland 100 Page 1 of 6
2 name 36C Schoharie silty clay loam, 8 to 15 Farmland of statewide importance D Schoharie silty clay loam, 15 to 25 Not prime farmland E Schoharie silty clay loam, 25 to 45 Not prime farmland A Schoharie silt loam, 0 to 3 All areas are prime farmland B Schoharie silt loam, 3 to 8 All areas are prime farmland A Niagara silt loam, 0 to 3 Prime farmland if drained B Niagara silt loam, 3 to 8 Prime farmland if drained A Rhinebeck silty clay loam, 0 to 3 Prime farmland if drained A Aeric Epiaquepts, 0 to 3 Prime farmland if drained A Canandaigua silt loam, 0 to 3 Farmland of statewide importance A Canandaigua mucky silt loam, 0 to 3 Not prime farmland A Fonda mucky silt loam, 0 to 3 Not prime farmland A Galen fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 All areas are prime farmland B Galen fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 All areas are prime farmland A Arkport fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 All areas are prime farmland B Arkport fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 All areas are prime farmland C Arkport fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 Farmland of statewide importance D Arkport fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 Not prime farmland B Arkport loamy fine sand, 3 to 8 All areas are prime farmland D Arkport loamy fine sand, 15 to 25 Not prime farmland E Arkport loamy fine sand, 25 to 35 Not prime farmland F Arkport loamy fine sand, 35 to 55 Not prime farmland B Dunkirk-Arkport complex, 3 to 8 All areas are prime farmland C Dunkirk-Arkport complex, 8 to 15 Farmland of statewide importance D Dunkirk-Arkport complex, 15 to 25 Not prime farmland A Lamson fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 Farmland of statewide importance A Lamson mucky fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 Not prime farmland A Elnora loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 All areas are prime farmland B Colonie loamy fine sand, 3 to 8 All areas are prime farmland C Colonie loamy fine sand, 8 to 15 Farmland of statewide importance B Mardin channery silt loam, 3 to 8 Farmland of statewide importance C Mardin channery silt loam, 8 to 15 Farmland of statewide importance D Mardin channery silt loam, 15 to 25 Not prime farmland E Mardin channery silt loam, 25 to 35 Not prime farmland B Langford channery silt loam, 3 to 8 Farmland of statewide importance C Langford channery silt loam, 8 to 15 pecent Farmland of statewide importance D Langford channery silt loam, 15 to 25 Not prime farmland B Langford-Erie channery silt loams, 3 to 8 Farmland of statewide importance A Lyons soils, 0 to 3 Not prime farmland A Volusia channery silt loam, 0 to 3 Farmland of statewide importance B Volusia channery silt loam, 3 to 8 Farmland of statewide importance C Volusia channery silt loam, 8 to 15 Farmland of statewide importance D Volusia channery silt loam, 15 to 25 Not prime farmland A Erie channery silt loam, 0 to 3 Farmland of statewide importance B Erie channery silt loam, 3 to 8 Farmland of statewide importance C Erie channery silt loam, 8 to 15 Farmland of statewide importance 100 Page 2 of 6
3 name 71A Darien silt loam, 0 to 3 Prime farmland if drained B Darien silt loam, 3 to 8 Prime farmland if drained C Darien silt loam, 8 to 15 Farmland of statewide importance A Darien-Ilion silt loams, 0 to 3 Prime farmland if drained B Darien-Ilion silt loams, 3 to 8 Prime farmland if drained B Gretor silt loam, 3 to 8 Prime farmland if drained C Gretor silt loam, 8 to 15 Farmland of statewide importance D Gretor channery silt loam, 15 to 25 Not prime farmland B Orpark silt loam, 3 to 8 Prime farmland if drained C Orpark silt loam, 8 to 15 Farmland of statewide importance D Orpark channery silt loam, 15 to 25 Not prime farmland A Chippewa silt loam, 0 to 3 Farmland of statewide importance B Chippewa silt loam, 3 to 8 Farmland of statewide importance B Manlius channery silt loam, 3 to 8 Farmland of statewide importance C Manlius channery silt loam, 8 to 15 Farmland of statewide importance D Manlius channery silt loam, 15 to 25 Not prime farmland A Palms muck, 0 to 3 Not prime farmland A Carlisle muck, 0 to 3 Not prime farmland A Edwards muck, 0 to 3 Not prime farmland A Martisco muck, 0 to 3 Not prime farmland A Saprists, 0 to 3, inundated Not prime farmland A Honeoye loam, 0 to 3 All areas are prime farmland B Honeoye loam, 3 to 8 All areas are prime farmland C Honeoye loam, 8 to 15 Farmland of statewide importance D Honeoye loam, 15 to 25 Not prime farmland E Honeoye loam, 25 to 35 Not prime farmland A Honeoye loam, 0 to 3, lower clay All areas are prime farmland 100 surface 104B Honeoye loam, 3 to 8, lower clay All areas are prime farmland 100 surface 104C Honeoye loam, 8 to 15, lower clay Farmland of statewide importance 100 surface 106B Danley-Lansing complex, 3 to 8 All areas are prime farmland B Conesus-Lansing complex, 3 to 8 All areas are prime farmland C Lansing loam, 8 to 15 Farmland of statewide importance D Lansing loam, 15 to 25 Not prime farmland E Lansing loam, 25 to 35 Not prime farmland B Ontario fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 All areas are prime farmland C Ontario fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 Farmland of statewide importance D Ontario fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 Not prime farmland E Ontario fine sandy loam, 25 to 35 Not prime farmland B Ontario gravelly loam, 3 to 8 All areas are prime farmland C Ontario gravelly loam, 8 to 15 Farmland of statewide importance D Ontario gravelly loam, 15 to 25 Not prime farmland B Ontario loam, 3 to 8 All areas are prime farmland C Ontario loam, 8 to 15 Farmland of statewide importance D Ontario loam, 15 to 25 Not prime farmland 100 Page 3 of 6
4 name 118F Ontario, Honeoye, and Lansing soils, 35 to 55 Not prime farmland E Palmyra and Howard soils, 25 to 45 Not prime farmland A Palmyra cobbly loam, 0 to 3 All areas are prime farmland B Palmyra cobbly loam, 3 to 8 All areas are prime farmland A Palmyra fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 All areas are prime farmland B Palmyra fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 All areas are prime farmland A Palmyra gravelly loam, 0 to 3 All areas are prime farmland B Palmyra gravelly loam, 3 to 8 All areas are prime farmland C Palmyra gravelly loam, 8 to 15 Farmland of statewide importance D Palmyra gravelly loam, 15 to 25 Not prime farmland A Palmyra gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 3 All areas are prime farmland B Palmyra gravelly sandy loam, 3 to 8 All areas are prime farmland C Palmyra gravelly sandy loam, 8 to 15 Farmland of statewide importance A Farmington loam, 0 to 3 Farmland of statewide importance B Farmington loam, 3 to 8 Farmland of statewide importance A Galoo loam, 0 to 3, rocky Not prime farmland B Galoo loam, 3 to 8, rocky Not prime farmland A Camillus silt loam, 0 to 3 All areas are prime farmland B Camillus silt loam, 3 to 8 All areas are prime farmland C Willdin-Norchip complex, 3 to 15 Farmland of statewide importance B Valois gravelly loam, 3 to 8 All areas are prime farmland C Valois gravelly loam, 8 to 15 Farmland of statewide importance D Valois gravelly loam, 15 to 25 Not prime farmland E Valois gravelly loam, 25 to 35 Not prime farmland B Valois gravelly loam, cool, 3 to 8 All areas are prime farmland C Valois gravelly loam, cool, 8 to 15 Farmland of statewide importance D Valois gravelly loam, cool, 15 to 25 Not prime farmland E Valois gravelly loam, cool, 25 to 35 Not prime farmland B Willdin channery silt loam, 3 to 8 Farmland of statewide importance C Willdin channery silt loam, 8 to 15 Farmland of statewide importance D Willdin channery silt loam, 15 to 25 Not prime farmland A Ontusia channery silt loam, 0 to 3 Farmland of statewide importance B Ontusia channery silt loam, 3 to 8 Farmland of statewide importance C Ontusia channery silt loam, 8 to 15 Farmland of statewide importance D Ontusia channery silt loam, 15 to 25 Not prime farmland C Lordstown-Manlius-Towerville complex, 8 to 15 Farmland of statewide importance D Lordstown-Manlius-Towerville complex, 15 to 25 Not prime farmland 100, very stony 171E Lordstown-Manlius-Towerville complex, 25 to 35 Not prime farmland 100, extremely stony 171F Lordstown-Manlius-Towerville complex, 35 to 80 Not prime farmland 100, extremely stony 177A Norchip silt loam, 0 to 3 Farmland of statewide importance B Norchip silt loam, 3 to 8 Farmland of statewide importance B Mongaup-Ischua complex, 3 to 8 All areas are prime farmland C Mongaup-Ischua complex, 8 to 15 Farmland of statewide importance 100 Page 4 of 6
5 name 181D Mongaup-Ischua complex, 15 to 25, Not prime farmland 100 very stony 181E Mongaup-Ischua complex, 25 to 35, Not prime farmland 100 extremely stony 182B Mongaup channery loam, 3 to 8 All areas are prime farmland C Mongaup channery loam, 8 to 15 Farmland of statewide importance A Lima loam, 0 to 3 All areas are prime farmland B Lima loam, 3 to 8 All areas are prime farmland C Lima loam, 8 to 15 Farmland of statewide importance A Lima loam, 0 to 3, lower clay surface All areas are prime farmland B Lima loam, 3 to 8, lower clay surface All areas are prime farmland A Phelps gravelly silt loam, 0 to 3 All areas are prime farmland B Phelps gravelly silt loam, 3 to 8 All areas are prime farmland A Nuhi silt loam, 0 to 3 Prime farmland if drained B Aurora-Angola silt loams, 3 to 8 Farmland of statewide importance C Aurora-Angola silt loams, 8 to 15 Farmland of statewide importance D Aurora-Angola silt loams, 15 to 25 Not prime farmland B Aurora silt loam, 3 to 8 Farmland of statewide importance C Aurora silt loam, 8 to 15 Farmland of statewide importance D Aurora silt loam, 15 to 25 Not prime farmland B Cazenovia silt loam, 3 to 8 All areas are prime farmland C Cazenovia silt loam, 8 to 15 Farmland of statewide importance D Cazenovia silt loam, 15 to 25 Not prime farmland B Cayuga silt loam, 3 to 8 All areas are prime farmland C Cayuga silt loam, 8 to 15 Farmland of statewide importance D Cayuga silt loam, 15 to 25 Not prime farmland A Kendaia loam, 0 to 3 Prime farmland if drained B Kendaia loam, 3 to 8 Prime farmland if drained A Angola silt loam, 0 to 3 Prime farmland if drained A Ovid silt loam, 0 to 3 Prime farmland if drained B Ovid silt loam, 3 to 8 Prime farmland if drained B Ovid silty clay loam, 3 to 8 Prime farmland if drained C Ovid silty clay loam, 8 to 15 Farmland of statewide importance A Udorthents, loamy, 0 to 3 Not prime farmland D Udorthents, refuse substratum. 0 to 25 Not prime farmland 100 PG Pits, gravel and sand Not prime farmland 100 PQ Pits, quarry Not prime farmland 100 W Water Not prime farmland 100 Page 5 of 6
6 Options Attribute Name: Farmland classification identifies map units as prime farmland, farmland of statewide importance, farmland of local importance, or unique farmland. It identifies the location and extent of the soils that are best suited to food, feed, fiber, forage, and oilseed crops. NRCS policy and procedures on prime and unique farmlands are published in the "Federal Register," Vol. 43, No. 21, January 31, Aggregation is the process by which a set of component attribute values is reduced to a single value to represent the map unit as a whole. A map unit is typically composed of one or more "components". A component is either some type of soil or some nonsoil entity, e.g., rock outcrop. The components in the map unit name represent the major soils within a map unit delineation. Minor components make up the balance of the map unit. Great differences in soil properties can occur between map unit components and within short distances. Minor components may be very different from the major components. Such differences could significantly affect use and management of the map unit. Minor components may or may not be documented in the database. The results of aggregation do not reflect the presence or absence of limitations of the components which are not listed in the database. An on-site investigation is required to identify the location of individual map unit components. For each of a map unit's components, a corresponding composition is recorded. A composition of 60 indicates that the corresponding component typically makes up approximately 60% of the map unit. Percent composition is a critical factor in some, but not all, aggregation methods. For the attribute being aggregated, the first step of the aggregation process is to derive one attribute value for each of a map unit's components. From this set of component attributes, the next step of the aggregation process derives a single value that represents the map unit as a whole. Once a single value for each map unit is derived, a thematic map for soil map units can be generated. Aggregation must be done because, on any soil map, map units are delineated but components are not. The majority of soil attributes are associated with a component of a map unit, and such an attribute has to be aggregated to the map unit level before a thematic map can be rendered. s, however, also have their own attributes. An attribute of a map unit does not have to be aggregated in order to render a corresponding thematic map. Therefore, the "aggregation method" for any attribute of a map unit is referred to as "No Aggregation Necessary". The tie-break rule indicates which value should be selected from a set of multiple candidate values, or which value should be selected in the event of a composition tie. Page 6 of 6
Surface Texture. Layer Option: Surface Layer Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Tie-break Rule: Lower
name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 Gravelly loam 45, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 Silty clay loam 100 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 Silty clay loam 100 4A Naples
More informationPercent Silt. Ontario County, New York Survey Area Version and Date: 13-09/24/2016
name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 10.9 45, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 44.1 90 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 45.4 90 4A Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3
More informationLiquid Limit. Ontario County, New York Survey Area Version and Date: 13-09/24/2016
name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 19.9 45, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 31.4 90 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 37.3 90 4A Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3
More informationDepth to a Selected Soil Restrictive Layer
1A 2A 3A 4A 5A 12D 13F 14D 15A 15B 16A 16B 16C 18A 19A 20A 24A 24B 24C 24D 25A 25B 25C 25D 25E 26B 27B 31A 31B 31C 31D 32A 32B 33A 33B 33C 33D 33E 34A 35A 35B Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3, frequently
More informationLinear Extensibility
name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 1.5 45, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 1.5 90 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 1.5 90 4A Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3 1.5
More informationDrainage Class. Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Tie-break Rule: Higher. Ontario County, New York Survey Area Version and Date: 13-09/24/2016
unit name unit 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 Poorly drained 55, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 Well drained 90 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 Moderately well drained
More informationDepth to Any Soil Restrictive Layer
1A 2A 3A 4A name Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3, frequently flooded Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3 5A Wayland soils complex,
More informationCation-Exchange Capacity (CEC-7)
name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 4.5 45, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 9.4 90 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 11.9 90 4A Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3 14.3
More informationRange Production (Unfavorable Year)
name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 45, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 4A Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3 5A Wayland soils complex,
More informationK Factor, Whole Soil
name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3.10 45, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3.49 90 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3.43 90 4A Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3.43 90
More informationSaturated Hydraulic Conductivity (Ksat), Standard Classes
name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 70.7261 45, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 3.1399 90 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 4.1265 90 4A Naples Creek silty clay loam,
More informationElectrical Conductivity (EC)
name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 0.0 45, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 0.0 90 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 0.0 90 4A Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3 0.0
More informationEffective Cation-Exchange Capacity (ECEC)
1A 2A 3A 4A name Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3, frequently flooded Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3 5A Wayland soils complex,
More informationSodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR)
name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 0.0 45, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 0.0 90 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 0.0 90 4A Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3 0.0
More informationPercent Clay. Ontario County, New York Survey Area Version and Date: 13-09/24/2016
name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 5.3 45, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 19.7 90 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 25.3 90 4A Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3
More informationHydrologic Soil Group
name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 A/D 85, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 C 90 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 C/D 90 4A Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3 B/D
More informationPotential for Seedling Mortality
1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently flooded reasons High Fluvaquents, frequently flooded 45% Wayland 10% Naples Creek 5% 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes
More informationErosion Hazard (Off-Road, Off-Trail)
1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently flooded reasons Slight Fluvaquents, frequently flooded 45% Udifluvents, frequently flooded 40% Wayland 10% Naples Creek 5% 2A Geneseo
More informationSoil Taxonomy Classification
1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 Mixed, mesic Fluvaquents 45, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 Fine-silty, mixed, active, mesic Oxyaquic Eutrudepts 3A Hemlock silty clay
More informationOneida County Soil Survey ID Number Name Slope/Descriptor 55A Adams Loamy Sand 0-3% slopes 55B Adams Loamy Sand 3-8% slopes 55C Adams Loamy Sand
Oneida County Soil Survey ID Number Name Slope/Descriptor 55A Adams Loamy Sand 0-3% slopes 55B Adams Loamy Sand 3-8% slopes 55C Adams Loamy Sand 8-15% slopes 55D Adams Loamy Sand 15-25% slopes 55E Adams
More informationAny County, New York. Custom Soil Resource Report for. Homer Vegetable Research Farm. United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Tompkins County, New York
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationFarmland Classification Centre County, Pennsylvania (Student Farm Site) Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey
256300 256600 256900 257200 257500 257800 258100 77 51' 20'' W 77 53' 26'' W Farmland Classification Centre County, Pennsylvania 258400 258700 259000 40 49' 4'' N 4520600 4520900 4520900 4521200 4521200
More informationThis section describes the geologic, soil, and topographic conditions of the Nation s four properties and immediately surrounding area.
Section 3.1: Land Resources A. INTRODUCTION This section describes the geologic, soil, and topographic conditions of the Nation s four properties and immediately surrounding area. B. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Ulster County, New York
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Columbia County, New York
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationSoils Report. Contact your local District Conservationist for site specific assistance
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Soils Report Contact your local District Conservationist for site specific assistance Farmland Classification Farmland Classification
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Orange County, Virginia
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Craighead County, Arkansas
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for State of Connecticut
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More information108 40' 29'' W Soil Map Mesa County Area, Colorado 108 36' 55'' W 39 10' 11'' N 39 6' 31'' N 4331700 4332500 4333300 4334100 4334900 4335700 4336500 4337300 4338100 701100 701900 702700 703500 704300 705100
More informationLand for Sale. Marion County, Georgia. $2,160,000 +/- 900 Acres $2,400 per Acre
Land for Sale Marion County, Georgia 2 Contents Property Fact Sheet... 3 Regional Map... 4 Local Map... 5 Aerial Map... 6 Major Soil Types Map... 7 Soil Classification Map... 8 Soil Classification Table...
More informationSoils Report. Contact your local District Conservationist for site specific assistance
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Soils Report Contact your local District Conservationist for site specific assistance Farmland Classification Farmland Classification
More informationSoils and their Relationship with Agriculture
Soils and their Relationship with Agriculture Presentation created by Thomas Gallagher Modified by Hank Bignell Capital Area Agriculture and Horticulture Program Cornell University Cooperative Extension
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for State of Connecticut
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationSeptember 20, 2016 Soils Investigation for Agricultural Designation Windemere Place, Missoula County, Montana
September 20, 201 Soils Investigation for Agricultural Designation Windemere Place, Missoula County, Montana The purpose of this report is to compare on-site soils of the proposed subdivision with the
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Orange County, New York, and Sussex County, New Jersey
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationArea 3 Envirothon Soils Questions Key
Area 3 Envirothon Soils Questions Key 1. Soil aeration is the exchange of air in soil with air from the atmosphere. When a soil is well aerated, the air within the soil is very similar to the atmosphere
More informationSOIL SEPARATES. Soil Evaluator Day 2, Presentation 3-3/27/2018. Soil Texture, Page 1 TITLE 5 SOIL EVALUATOR CERTIFICATION TRAINING SOIL TEXTURE
Soil Evaluator Day 2, Presentation 3-3/27/18 TITLE 5 SOIL EVALUATOR CERTIFICATION TRAINING SOIL TEXTURE Prepared for: Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection By L.A. Spokas,
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Yamhill Area, Oregon
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Polk County, Oregon
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationLane County Land Management Division
Lane County Land Management Division Prepared by Lane County Soil Ratings for Forestry The Lane County Land Management Division, with technical assistance from the Lane Council of Governments, compiled
More informationNRCS Soils Report. Grand River Gathering LLC K28E Compressor Station. OA Project No
NRCS Soils Report Grand River Gathering LLC K28E Compressor Station OA Project No. 012-032 82 21 ½ Road Grand Junction, CO 81505 TEL 90.23.800 FAX 90.23.45 United States Department of Agriculture A product
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report Soil Map
77 11' 22'' W Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map 77 9' 43'' W 36 48' 13'' N 304700 304900 305100 305300 305500 305700 305900 306100 306300 306500 306700 306900 307100 36 48' 13'' N 36 47' 21'' N 4073800
More informationSOIL SCIENTIST REPORT FOR THE CONNECTICUT PORTION OF THE CONNECTICUT EXPANSION PROJECT. Prepared for:
SOIL SCIENTIST REPORT FOR THE CONNECTICUT PORTION OF THE CONNECTICUT EXPANSION PROJECT Prepared for: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. 1001 Louisiana Street Houston, Texas 77002 Prepared by: AECOM
More informationSoil Science Curriculum
Soil Science Curriculum Content and lab derived from the USDA-NRCS Guides for Educators. Go to www.nrcs.usda.gov/soils for the Guides and additional pictures and diagrams. This lesson plan was adapted
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Hancock County Area, Maine
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationSoil types of lake county
Soil types of lake county Ad Adrian muck This deep, level, very poorly drained organic soil is in depressional areas on the lake plain. It is subject to frequent flooding. Slope is generally less than
More information2016 Area 3 Envirothon Muskingum County Soils Test ANSWER KEY
2016 Area 3 Envirothon Muskingum County Soils Test ANSWER KEY 1. The majority of the bedrock in Muskingum County is. a. sedimentary bedrock b. glacial bedrock c. igneous bedrock d. metamorphic bedrock
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Lane County Area, Oregon
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationSection 1. Judging the soil pit (questions 1-4)
CONNECTICUT ENVIROTHON 2009 SOILS QUESTIONS Please select the best response to the following questions. There are 25 questions; each question is worth 4 points. Section 1. Judging the soil pit (questions
More informationTP73 4PTP101 TP45 TP9 TP74 TP46 TP47 TP115 TP48 TP32 TP5 TP31 TP22 TP49 V58 TP57 4F TP50 TP51 3PD 3PD TP80 TP28 TP55
Figure 2.1-3 - Capability Assessment Map Part of Lots 18 and 19, Concession 3 Township of Russell sified unclas TP72 TP90 TP624P V18 3D TP35 TP73 4PTP101 3D TP45 TP9 TP74 TP89 TP117 V61 V34 TP19 TP20 TP100
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Pope County, Illinois
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationSubmittal Document II.I. USDA NRCS Soil Resources Report
Submittal Document II.I. USDA NRCS Soil Resources Report United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Southampton County, Virginia
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Fond du Lac County, Wisconsin
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Centre County, Pennsylvania
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Hinds County, Mississippi
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More information80 ACRES M/L BOONE COUNTY, IOWA LISTING # Pilot Mound, Iowa. I Avenue. 130th Street. Co Hwy P th Street
Co Hwy P70 I Avenue 80 ACRES M/L BOONE COUNTY, IOWA CAPTION Pilot Mound, 130th Street 130th Street LISTING #12320 New Listing Price! $800,000 DESCRIPTION: High Quality Farm in Strong Farming Area and potential
More informationVALLEY LATERAL PROJECT. DRAFT RESOURCE REPORT 7 Soils. FERC Docket No. PF
VALLEY LATERAL PROJECT DRAFT RESOURCE REPORT 7 Soils FERC Docket No. PF15-23-000 August 2015 Section TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 7.0 SOILS... 7-1 7.1 SOILS IN THE PROJECT AREA... 7-1 7.1.1 Pipeline Facilities...
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Gallia County, Ohio
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationNRCS Soils Report. Encana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc. C19 Injection Well. OA Project No
NRCS Soils Report Encana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc. C19 Injection Well OA Project No. 012-0178 826 21 ½ Road Grand Junction, CO 81505 TEL 970.263.7800 FAX 970.263.7456 United States Department of Agriculture
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Clearfield County, Pennsylvania
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationAPPENDIX A SOIL RESOURCES REPORTS
APPENDIX A SOIL RESOURCES REPORTS United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department
More informationSoils and Land Use Test
SOIL PROPERTIES Total Score /50 1) List two of the five main functions of soil. (2 points) Habitat for organisms, Engineering medium, Filters and stores water, Anchor for plants, Cycles nutrients 2) Small
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Alsea Area, Oregon, and Lincoln County Area, Oregon
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More information4: SOILS. A. Soil Survey Maps. B. Soil Series and Map Units
A. Soil Survey Maps 4: SOILS The soil is the unconsolidated mineral material on the immediate surface of the earth and which serves as the medium for growth of land plants. The characteristics of each
More informationBENNING ROAD & BRIDGES TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS NRCS SOIL RESOURCE REPORT DRAFT MAY 2016
BENNING ROAD & BRIDGES TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS NRCS SOIL RESOURCE REPORT DRAFT MAY 2016 United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative
More informationSTATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION WITTON PARK, COUNTY DURHAM PROPOSED QUARRY EXTENSION DECEMBER 1992
More information
Custom Soil Resource Report for Cibola Area, New Mexico, Parts of Cibola, McKinley, and Valencia Counties
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationDraft Resource Report 7 Soils. FERC Docket No.PF Pre-filing draft October Public
Spire STL Pipeline Project Draft Resource Report 7 Soils FERC Docket o.pf16-9-000 Pre-filing draft October 2016 Public RESOURCE REPORT 7 - SOILS SUMMARY OF FILIG IFORMATIO Information 1. Identify, describe,
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Franklin County, Washington
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More information2011 Wisconsin Envirothon Soils and Land Use Exam
2011 Wisconsin Envirothon Soils and Land Use Exam USE THE OCONTO COUNTY SOIL SURVEY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS 1-4 The Pensaukee River Wetland Complex is a mixture of state (Pensaukee Wildlife Area) and privately
More informationLesson 1: Identifying Texture in Soil
Lesson 1: Identifying Texture in Soil 1 Clods Loam Peds Permeability Soil structure Soil texture Soil workability Textural triangle Water-holding capacity 2 I. A. Soil texture is the fineness or coarseness
More informationSOILS IN URBAN / SUBURBAN LANDSCAPES. Lisa Krall Soil Scientist CT USDA NRCS Tolland, CT
SOILS IN URBAN / SUBURBAN LANDSCAPES Lisa Krall Soil Scientist CT USDA NRCS Tolland, CT What is Urban Soil? Is This Soil? Is This Soil? active gravel pit pavement and buildings vegetated roadside areas
More information1. Position (2 pts.) 2. Parent Material (2 pts.) 3. Slope Characteristics (2 pts.) 4. Surface Stoniness or Rockiness (2 pts.)
Maryland Envirothon SOILS Exam Guidance Information (revised 2017) Objective: To test students' knowledge and awareness of basic soil science and its application in wise land-use planning and therefore
More informationPHYSICAL CHAtlACTERISTICS REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED SAND AND GRAVEL SITE AT MANOR FARM, UFFINGTON
PHYSICAL CHAtlACTERISTICS REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED SAND AND GRAVEL SITE AT MANOR FARM, UFFINGTON Introduction Following the" request for detailed information on the physical characteristics of soil at Manor
More informationSTATE TAX COMMISSION OF MISSOURI ASSESSOR MANUAL
STATE TAX COMMISSION OF MISSOURI ASSESSOR MANUAL CHAPTER: REVISION DATE: 10/1/2008 Page 1 of 18 7.3 The purpose of this section of the Assessor s Manual is to supplement the State Tax Commission s published
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Pope County, Illinois
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationSoil characteristics that influence nitrogen and water management
Section C Soil characteristics that influence nitrogen and water management Soil characteristics vary across the landscape Soils vary from one field to another, and often within the same field. Soil differences
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Kane County, Illinois
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationSoil Interpretations Erosion and Sedimentation Control Planning and Design Workshop
Soil Interpretations Erosion and Sedimentation Control Planning and Design Workshop Presented by Richard Brooks Presentation prepared by Kristin May Resource Soil Scientists USDA-Natural Resources Conservation
More informationGeology, Soils, and Topography October 13, ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS, MITIGATION. 3.1 Geology, Soils, and Topography
3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS, MITIGATION Geology, Soils, and Topography 3.1 Geology, Soils, and Topography 3.1.1 Existing Conditions Geology The project site is underlain by sedimentary rocks of
More informationSoils of Randolph County, Arkansas B.Dixon, T.H. Udouj, H.D. Scott, R.L. Johnson, and J.M. McKimmey
B.Dixon, T.H. Udouj, H.D. Scott, R.L. Johnson, and J.M. McKimmey INTRODUCTION Soil is one of the most important natural resources of Arkansas. Information on soil behavior is used in agriculture, engineering
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Madison County, Virginia, and Orange County, Virginia
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationSoil Survey of Nelson County, Virginia
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service In cooperation with United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, and Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State
More informationSoil testing Page 1. Contrary to what is widely believed, the colour of the soil reveals very little about its fertility.
Soil testing Page 1 Soil The Basics Soil is the uppermost surface of the earth, which has been slowly transformed by decomposition due to the effects of weather, vegetation and human activities. The parent
More information2 Older farm homes on the land
2 Older farm homes on the land LAND RANCHES EXCHANGES This ranch consists of 70 +/_ acres of level farmland. Prime 13700 POWERHOUSE RD POTTER VALLEY agricultural land at an attractive price. This property
More informationAerial Map. map center: 38 0' 55.53, ' S-4E Franklin County Illinois
Aerial Map map center: 38 0' 55.53, -88 42' 58.78 0ft 594ft 1188ft 11/24/2016 Field borders provided by Farm Service Agency as of 5/21/2008. Soils data provided by University of at Champaign-Urbana. Topography
More informationTopoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No Waiau
This Technical Data Sheet describes the typical average properties of the specified soil. It is essentially a summary of information obtained from one or more profiles of this soil that were examined and
More informationSoil Survey of Ashtabula County, Ohio
Soil Survey of Ashtabula County, Ohio United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service In cooperation with Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Soil and Water
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Daviess County, Missouri
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationHorner-McLaughlin Woods: Soil Types
Horner-McLaughlin Woods: Soil Types Not present at HMW Adrian Muck Conover Loam 0-4% Slopes Houghton Muck Miami Loam 2-6% Slopes Miami Loam 6-12% Slopes Miami Loam 12-18% Slopes t 0 0.125 0.25 Miles Mary
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Centre County, Pennsylvania
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationSurvey of Texas Vineyard Soils
Survey of Texas Vineyard Soils Characteristics and Challenges Ed Hellman Professor of Viticulture Bachelor of Science in Plant and Soil Science Degree Concentrations: Viticulture and Enology Local Food
More information~ NRCS. Custom Soil Resource Report for Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties. USDA United States ~ Department of Agriculture
USA United States ~ epartment of Agriculture ~ NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States epartment of Agriculture
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Polk County, Oregon
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationPhotographs and Descriptions of Representative Pedons by Site
Photographs and Descriptions of Representative Pedons by Site Site: A Classification: Typic Vitricryand Location: North-central edge of the park; Northwest over Scarface ridge from Lake Eleanor. Dominant
More informationSOIL ENGINEERING (EENV 4300)
SOIL ENGINEERING (EENV 4300) Chapter 5 Classification of Soil Why Classification? Classification systems provide a common language to concisely express the general characteristics of soils, which are infinitely
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Choctaw County, Oklahoma, and McCurtain County, Oklahoma
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More information