Soil Taxonomy Classification

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Soil Taxonomy Classification"

Transcription

1 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 Mixed, mesic Fluvaquents 45, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 Fine-silty, mixed, active, mesic Oxyaquic Eutrudepts 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 Fine-silty, mixed, active, mesic Fluvaquentic Eutrudepts 4A Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3 Fine-silty, mixed, active, nonacid, mesic Fluventic 5A Wayland soils complex, 0 to 3, Fine-silty, mixed, active, nonacid, mesic Fluvaquentic frequently flooded 12D Rockrift channery silt loam, 15 to 25 Loamy-skeletal, mixed, active, frigid Typic 13F Rock outcrop-arnot complex, 25 to D Cadosia channery silt loam, 15 to 25 Loamy-skeletal, mixed, active, mesic Typic 15A Guyanoga channery silt loam, fan, 0 to 3 Loamy-skeletal, mixed, active, mesic Dystric Eutrudepts 15B Guyanoga channery silt loam, fan, 3 to 8 Loamy-skeletal, mixed, active, mesic Dystric Eutrudepts 16A Almond channery silt loam, 0 to 3 Fine-loamy, mixed, semiactive, acid, frigid Aeric 80 16B Almond channery silt loam, 3 to 8 Fine-loamy, mixed, semiactive, acid, frigid Aeric 80 16C Almond channery silt loam, 8 to 15 Fine-loamy, mixed, semiactive, acid, frigid Aeric 80 18A Homer fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 Fine-loamy over sandy or sandy-skeletal, mixed, active, mesic Aeric Endoaqualfs 19A Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic, Typic Argiaquolls, Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Typic Argiaquolls 80 0 to 3 20A Atherton and Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic, Typic Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Typic Argiaquolls 40 Argiaquolls, 0 to 3 24A Howard gravelly loam, 0 to 3 Loamy-skeletal, mixed, active, 80 24B Howard gravelly loam, 3 to 8 Loamy-skeletal, mixed, active, 80 24C Howard gravelly loam, 8 to 15 Loamy-skeletal, mixed, active, 80 24D Howard soils, 15 to 25 Loamy-skeletal, mixed, active, 65 25A Chenango gravelly loam, 0 to 3 Loamy-skeletal, mixed, superactive, mesic Typic 25B Chenango gravelly loam, 3 to 8 Loamy-skeletal, mixed, superactive, mesic Typic 25C Chenango gravelly loam, 8 to 15 Loamy-skeletal, mixed, superactive, mesic Typic 25D Chenango gravelly loam, 15 to 25 Loamy-skeletal, mixed, superactive, mesic Typic 25E Chenango gravelly loam, 25 to 35 Loamy-skeletal, mixed, superactive, mesic Typic 26B Chenango channery loam, fan, 3 to 8 Loamy-skeletal, mixed, superactive, mesic Typic 27B Castile gravelly silt loam, 3 to 8 Loamy-skeletal, mixed, active, mesic Aquic 31A Collamer silt loam, 0 to 3 Fine-silty, mixed, semiactive, mesic Glossaquic Hapludalfs 31B Collamer silt loam, 3 to 8 Fine-silty, mixed, semiactive, mesic Glossaquic Hapludalfs 31C Collamer silt loam, 8 to 15 Fine-silty, mixed, semiactive, mesic Glossaquic Hapludalfs 31D Collamer silt loam, 15 to 25 Fine-silty, mixed, semiactive, mesic Glossaquic Hapludalfs 32A Dunkirk fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 Fine-silty, mixed, active, 32B Dunkirk fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 Fine-silty, mixed, active, 33A Dunkirk silt loam, 0 to 3 Fine-silty, mixed, active, 33B Dunkirk silt loam, 3 to 8 Fine-silty, mixed, active, Page 1 of 8

2 33C Dunkirk silt loam, 8 to 15 Fine-silty, mixed, active, 33D Dunkirk silt loam, 15 to 25 Fine-silty, mixed, active, 33E Dunkirk silt loam, 25 to 35 Fine-silty, mixed, active, 34A Lakemont silty clay loam, 0 to 3 Fine, illitic, mesic Udollic Endoaqualfs 35A Odessa silt loam, 0 to 3 Fine, illitic, mesic Aeric Endoaqualfs 35B Odessa silty clay loam, 3 to 8 Fine, illitic, mesic Aeric Endoaqualfs 36A Schoharie silty clay loam, 0 to 3 Fine, illitic, mesic Oxyaquic Hapludalfs 36B Schoharie silty clay loam, 3 to 8 Fine, illitic, mesic Oxyaquic Hapludalfs 36C Schoharie silty clay loam, 8 to 15 Fine, illitic, mesic Oxyaquic Hapludalfs 36D Schoharie silty clay loam, 15 to 25 Fine, illitic, mesic Oxyaquic Hapludalfs 36E Schoharie silty clay loam, 25 to 45 Fine, illitic, mesic Oxyaquic Hapludalfs 37A Schoharie silt loam, 0 to 3 Fine, illitic, mesic Oxyaquic Hapludalfs 37B Schoharie silt loam, 3 to 8 Fine, illitic, mesic Oxyaquic Hapludalfs 38A Niagara silt loam, 0 to 3 Fine-silty, mixed, active, mesic Aeric Endoaqualfs 38B Niagara silt loam, 3 to 8 Fine-silty, mixed, active, mesic Aeric Endoaqualfs 39A Rhinebeck silty clay loam, 0 to 3 Fine, illitic, mesic Aeric Endoaqualfs 41A Aeric Epiaquepts, 0 to 3 Coarse-loamy over clayey, mixed, semiactive, nonacid, mesic Aeric Epiaquepts 43A Canandaigua silt loam, 0 to 3 Fine-silty, mixed, active, nonacid, mesic Aeric 44A Canandaigua mucky silt loam, 0 to 3 Fine-silty, mixed, active, nonacid, mesic Typic Endoaquolls 45A Fonda mucky silt loam, 0 to 3 Fine, illitic, nonacid, mesic Mollic 46A Galen fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 Coarse-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Oxyaquic Hapludalfs 46B Galen fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 Coarse-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Oxyaquic Hapludalfs 48A Arkport fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 Coarse-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Lamellic Hapludalfs 48B Arkport fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 Coarse-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Lamellic Hapludalfs 48C Arkport fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 Coarse-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Lamellic Hapludalfs 48D Arkport fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 Coarse-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Lamellic Hapludalfs 49B Arkport loamy fine sand, 3 to 8 Coarse-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Lamellic Hapludalfs 49D Arkport loamy fine sand, 15 to 25 Coarse-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Lamellic Hapludalfs 49E Arkport loamy fine sand, 25 to 35 Coarse-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Lamellic Hapludalfs 49F Arkport loamy fine sand, 35 to 55 Coarse-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Lamellic Hapludalfs 50B Dunkirk-Arkport complex, 3 to 8 Fine-silty, mixed, active, 50 50C Dunkirk-Arkport complex, 8 to 15 Fine-silty, mixed, active, 60 50D Dunkirk-Arkport complex, 15 to 25 Fine-silty, mixed, active, 60 53A Lamson fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 Coarse-loamy, mixed, active, nonacid, mesic Aeric 54A Lamson mucky fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 Coarse-loamy, mixed, active, nonacid, mesic Aeric 56A Elnora loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 Mixed, mesic Aquic Udipsamments 58B Colonie loamy fine sand, 3 to 8 Mixed, mesic Lamellic Udipsamments 58C Colonie loamy fine sand, 8 to 15 Mixed, mesic Lamellic Udipsamments 62B Mardin channery silt loam, 3 to 8 Coarse-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Typic Fragiudepts 62C Mardin channery silt loam, 8 to 15 Coarse-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Typic Fragiudepts 93 62D Mardin channery silt loam, 15 to 25 Coarse-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Typic Fragiudepts 62E Mardin channery silt loam, 25 to 35 Coarse-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Typic Fragiudepts 88 63B Langford channery silt loam, 3 to 8 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Typic Fragiudepts 63C Langford channery silt loam, 8 to 15 pecent Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Typic Fragiudepts 63D Langford channery silt loam, 15 to 25 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Typic Fragiudepts Page 2 of 8

3 64B Langford-Erie channery silt loams, 3 to 8 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Typic Fragiudepts 55 66A Lyons soils, 0 to 3 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, nonacid, mesic Mollic 68A Volusia channery silt loam, 0 to 3 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Aeric Fragiaquepts 68B Volusia channery silt loam, 3 to 8 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Aeric Fragiaquepts 68C Volusia channery silt loam, 8 to 15 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Aeric Fragiaquepts 68D Volusia channery silt loam, 15 to 25 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Aeric Fragiaquepts 69A Erie channery silt loam, 0 to 3 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Aeric Fragiaquepts B Erie channery silt loam, 3 to 8 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Aeric Fragiaquepts C Erie channery silt loam, 8 to 15 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Aeric Fragiaquepts A Darien silt loam, 0 to 3 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Aeric Endoaqualfs 96 71B Darien silt loam, 3 to 8 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Aeric Endoaqualfs 96 71C Darien silt loam, 8 to 15 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Aeric Endoaqualfs 96 72A Darien-Ilion silt loams, 0 to 3 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Aeric Endoaqualfs 73 72B Darien-Ilion silt loams, 3 to 8 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Aeric Endoaqualfs 73 73B Gretor silt loam, 3 to 8 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, acid, frigid Aeric C Gretor silt loam, 8 to 15 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, acid, frigid Aeric D Gretor channery silt loam, 15 to 25 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, acid, frigid Aeric 92 76B Orpark silt loam, 3 to 8 Fine-loamy, mixed, semiactive, acid, mesic Aeric C Orpark silt loam, 8 to 15 Fine-loamy, mixed, semiactive, acid, mesic Aeric D Orpark channery silt loam, 15 to 25 Fine-loamy, mixed, semiactive, acid, mesic Aeric 77A Chippewa silt loam, 0 to 3 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Typic Fragiaquepts 77B Chippewa silt loam, 3 to 8 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Typic Fragiaquepts 82B Manlius channery silt loam, 3 to 8 Loamy-skeletal, mixed, active, mesic Typic 82C Manlius channery silt loam, 8 to 15 Loamy-skeletal, mixed, active, mesic Typic 82D Manlius channery silt loam, 15 to 25 Loamy-skeletal, mixed, active, mesic Typic 91A Palms muck, 0 to 3 Loamy, mixed, euic, mesic Terric Haplosaprists 92A Carlisle muck, 0 to 3 Euic, mesic Typic Haplosaprists 93A Edwards muck, 0 to 3 Marly, euic, mesic Limnic Haplosaprists 94A Martisco muck, 0 to 3 Fine-silty, carbonatic, mesic Histic Humaquepts A Saprists, 0 to 3, inundated Saprists 101A Honeoye loam, 0 to 3 Fine-loamy, mixed, semiactive, 101B Honeoye loam, 3 to 8 Fine-loamy, mixed, semiactive, 101C Honeoye loam, 8 to 15 Fine-loamy, mixed, semiactive, 101D Honeoye loam, 15 to 25 Fine-loamy, mixed, semiactive, 101E Honeoye loam, 25 to 35 Fine-loamy, mixed, semiactive, 104A Honeoye loam, 0 to 3, lower clay Fine-loamy, mixed, semiactive, surface 104B Honeoye loam, 3 to 8, lower clay Fine-loamy, mixed, semiactive, surface 104C Honeoye loam, 8 to 15, lower clay Fine-loamy, mixed, semiactive, surface 106B Danley-Lansing complex, 3 to 8 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Glossaquic Hapludalfs B Conesus-Lansing complex, 3 to 8 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Glossaquic Hapludalfs C Lansing loam, 8 to 15 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, D Lansing loam, 15 to 25 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, 88 Page 3 of 8

4 108E Lansing loam, 25 to 35 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, 112B Ontario fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, 112C Ontario fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, 112D Ontario fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, 112E Ontario fine sandy loam, 25 to 35 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, B Ontario gravelly loam, 3 to 8 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, C Ontario gravelly loam, 8 to 15 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, 114D Ontario gravelly loam, 15 to 25 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, 116B Ontario loam, 3 to 8 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, 116C Ontario loam, 8 to 15 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, 116D Ontario loam, 15 to 25 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, 118F Ontario, Honeoye, and Lansing soils, 35 to 55 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, E Palmyra and Howard soils, 25 to 45 Fine-loamy over sandy or sandy-skeletal, mixed, active, A Palmyra cobbly loam, 0 to 3 Fine-loamy over sandy or sandy-skeletal, mixed, active, 122B Palmyra cobbly loam, 3 to 8 Fine-loamy over sandy or sandy-skeletal, mixed, active, 124A Palmyra fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 Fine-loamy over sandy or sandy-skeletal, mixed, active, 124B Palmyra fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 Fine-loamy over sandy or sandy-skeletal, mixed, active, 126A Palmyra gravelly loam, 0 to 3 Fine-loamy over sandy or sandy-skeletal, mixed, active, 126B Palmyra gravelly loam, 3 to 8 Fine-loamy over sandy or sandy-skeletal, mixed, active, 126C Palmyra gravelly loam, 8 to 15 Fine-loamy over sandy or sandy-skeletal, mixed, active, 126D Palmyra gravelly loam, 15 to 25 Fine-loamy over sandy or sandy-skeletal, mixed, active, 128A Palmyra gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 3 Fine-loamy over sandy or sandy-skeletal, mixed, active, 128B Palmyra gravelly sandy loam, 3 to 8 Fine-loamy over sandy or sandy-skeletal, mixed, active, 128C Palmyra gravelly sandy loam, 8 to 15 Fine-loamy over sandy or sandy-skeletal, mixed, active, 130A Farmington loam, 0 to 3 Loamy, mixed, active, mesic Lithic Eutrudepts 130B Farmington loam, 3 to 8 Loamy, mixed, active, mesic Lithic Eutrudepts 132A Galoo loam, 0 to 3, rocky Loamy, mixed, active, nonacid, mesic Lithic Udorthents 132B Galoo loam, 3 to 8, rocky Loamy, mixed, active, nonacid, mesic Lithic Udorthents 134A Camillus silt loam, 0 to 3 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Typic Eutrudepts 134B Camillus silt loam, 3 to 8 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Typic Eutrudepts 151C Willdin-Norchip complex, 3 to 15 Coarse-loamy, mixed, active, frigid Typic Fragiudepts B Valois gravelly loam, 3 to 8 Fine-loamy, mixed, superactive, mesic Typic 152C Valois gravelly loam, 8 to 15 Fine-loamy, mixed, superactive, mesic Typic 152D Valois gravelly loam, 15 to 25 Fine-loamy, mixed, superactive, mesic Typic 152E Valois gravelly loam, 25 to 35 Fine-loamy, mixed, superactive, mesic Typic 153B Valois gravelly loam, cool, 3 to 8 Fine-loamy, mixed, superactive, frigid Typic 153C Valois gravelly loam, cool, 8 to 15 Fine-loamy, mixed, superactive, frigid Typic 153D Valois gravelly loam, cool, 15 to 25 Fine-loamy, mixed, superactive, frigid Typic Page 4 of 8

5 153E Valois gravelly loam, cool, 25 to 35 Fine-loamy, mixed, superactive, frigid Typic 162B Willdin channery silt loam, 3 to 8 Coarse-loamy, mixed, active, frigid Typic Fragiudepts 162C Willdin channery silt loam, 8 to 15 Coarse-loamy, mixed, active, frigid Typic Fragiudepts 162D Willdin channery silt loam, 15 to 25 Coarse-loamy, mixed, active, frigid Typic Fragiudepts A Ontusia channery silt loam, 0 to 3 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, frigid Aeric Fragiaquepts B Ontusia channery silt loam, 3 to 8 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, frigid Aeric Fragiaquepts 168C Ontusia channery silt loam, 8 to 15 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, frigid Aeric Fragiaquepts 168D Ontusia channery silt loam, 15 to 25 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, frigid Aeric Fragiaquepts C Lordstown-Manlius-Towerville complex, 8 to 15 Loamy-skeletal, mixed, active, mesic Typic D Lordstown-Manlius-Towerville complex, 15 to 25 Loamy-skeletal, mixed, active, mesic Typic 70, very stony 171E Lordstown-Manlius-Towerville complex, 25 to 35 Loamy-skeletal, mixed, active, mesic Typic 70, extremely stony 171F Lordstown-Manlius-Towerville complex, 35 to 80 Loamy-skeletal, mixed, active, mesic Typic 70, extremely stony 177A Norchip silt loam, 0 to 3 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, frigid Aeric Fragiaquepts B Norchip silt loam, 3 to 8 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, frigid Aeric Fragiaquepts B Mongaup-Ischua complex, 3 to 8 Loamy-skeletal, mixed, active, frigid Typic C Mongaup-Ischua complex, 8 to 15 Loamy-skeletal, mixed, active, frigid Typic D Mongaup-Ischua complex, 15 to 25, Loamy-skeletal, mixed, active, frigid Typic 55 very stony 181E Mongaup-Ischua complex, 25 to 35, Loamy-skeletal, mixed, active, frigid Typic 55 extremely stony 182B Mongaup channery loam, 3 to 8 Loamy-skeletal, mixed, active, frigid Typic 182C Mongaup channery loam, 8 to 15 Loamy-skeletal, mixed, active, frigid Typic 201A Lima loam, 0 to 3 Fine-loamy, mixed, semiactive, mesic Oxyaquic Hapludalfs 201B Lima loam, 3 to 8 Fine-loamy, mixed, semiactive, mesic Oxyaquic Hapludalfs 201C Lima loam, 8 to 15 Fine-loamy, mixed, semiactive, mesic Oxyaquic Hapludalfs 204A Lima loam, 0 to 3, lower clay surface Fine-loamy, mixed, semiactive, mesic Oxyaquic Hapludalfs 204B Lima loam, 3 to 8, lower clay surface Fine-loamy, mixed, semiactive, mesic Oxyaquic Hapludalfs 210A Phelps gravelly silt loam, 0 to 3 Fine-loamy over sandy or sandy-skeletal, mixed, active, mesic Glossaquic Hapludalfs 210B Phelps gravelly silt loam, 3 to 8 Fine-loamy over sandy or sandy-skeletal, mixed, active, mesic Glossaquic Hapludalfs 212A Nuhi silt loam, 0 to 3 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Glossaquic Hapludalfs 240B Aurora-Angola silt loams, 3 to 8 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Glossaquic Hapludalfs C Aurora-Angola silt loams, 8 to 15 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Glossaquic Hapludalfs D Aurora-Angola silt loams, 15 to 25 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Glossaquic Hapludalfs B Aurora silt loam, 3 to 8 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Glossaquic Hapludalfs 241C Aurora silt loam, 8 to 15 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Glossaquic Hapludalfs D Aurora silt loam, 15 to 25 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Glossaquic Hapludalfs 255B Cazenovia silt loam, 3 to 8 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Oxyaquic Hapludalfs 255C Cazenovia silt loam, 8 to 15 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Oxyaquic Hapludalfs 255D Cazenovia silt loam, 15 to 25 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Oxyaquic Hapludalfs 260B Cayuga silt loam, 3 to 8 Fine, illitic, mesic Oxyaquic Glossudalfs 260C Cayuga silt loam, 8 to 15 Fine, illitic, mesic Oxyaquic Glossudalfs 260D Cayuga silt loam, 15 to 25 Fine, illitic, mesic Oxyaquic Glossudalfs 304A Kendaia loam, 0 to 3 Fine-loamy, mixed, semiactive, nonacid, mesic Aeric Page 5 of 8

6 304B Kendaia loam, 3 to 8 Fine-loamy, mixed, semiactive, nonacid, mesic Aeric 342A Angola silt loam, 0 to 3 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Aeric Endoaqualfs 356A Ovid silt loam, 0 to 3 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Aeric Endoaqualfs 356B Ovid silt loam, 3 to 8 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Aeric Endoaqualfs 357B Ovid silty clay loam, 3 to 8 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Aeric Endoaqualfs 357C Ovid silty clay loam, 8 to 15 Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Aeric Endoaqualfs 400A Udorthents, loamy, 0 to 3 Udorthents D Udorthents, refuse substratum. 0 to 25 Udorthents 100 PG Pits, gravel and sand 75 PQ Pits, quarry 80 W Water 100 Page 6 of 8

7 Options Attribute Name: This rating presents the taxonomic classification based on Soil Taxonomy. The system of soil classification used by the National Cooperative Soil Survey has six categories (Soil Survey Staff, 1999 and 2003). Beginning with the broadest, these categories are the order, suborder, great group, subgroup, family, and series. Classification is based on soil properties observed in the field or inferred from those observations or from laboratory measurements. This table shows the classification of the soils in the survey area. The categories are defined in the following paragraphs. ORDER. Twelve soil orders are recognized. The differences among orders reflect the dominant soil-forming processes and the degree of soil formation. Each order is identified by a word ending in sol. An example is Alfisols. SUBORDER. Each order is divided into suborders primarily on the basis of properties that influence soil genesis and are important to plant growth or properties that reflect the most important variables within the orders. The last syllable in the name of a suborder indicates the order. An example is Udalfs (Ud, meaning humid, plus alfs, from Alfisols). GREAT GROUP. Each suborder is divided into great groups on the basis of close similarities in kind, arrangement, and degree of development of pedogenic horizons; soil moisture and temperature regimes; type of saturation; and base status. Each great group is identified by the name of a suborder and by a prefix that indicates a property of the soil. An example is Hapludalfs (Hapl, meaning minimal horizonation, plus udalfs, the suborder of the Alfisols that has a udic moisture regime). SUBGROUP. Each great group has a typic subgroup. Other subgroups are intergrades or extragrades. The typic subgroup is the central concept of the great group; it is not necessarily the most extensive. Intergrades are transitions to other orders, suborders, or great groups. Extragrades have some properties that are not representative of the great group but do not indicate transitions to any other taxonomic class. Each subgroup is identified by one or more adjectives preceding the name of the great group. The adjective Typic identifies the subgroup that typifies the great group. An example is Typic Hapludalfs. FAMILY. Families are established within a subgroup on the basis of physical and chemical properties and other characteristics that affect management. Generally, the properties are those of horizons below plow depth where there is much biological activity. Among the properties and characteristics considered are particle-size class, mineralogy class, cation-exchange activity class, soil temperature regime, soil depth, and reaction class. A family name consists of the name of a subgroup preceded by terms that indicate soil properties. An example is fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Typic Hapludalfs. SERIES. The series consists of soils within a family that have horizons similar in color, texture, structure, reaction, consistence, mineral and chemical composition, and arrangement in the profile. References: Soil Survey Staff Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. Soil Survey Staff Keys to soil taxonomy. 10th edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. (The soils in a given survey area may have been classified according to earlier editions of this publication.) Aggregation is the process by which a set of component attribute values is reduced to a single value to represent the map unit as a whole. A map unit is typically composed of one or more "components". A component is either some type of soil or some nonsoil entity, e.g., rock outcrop. The components in the map unit name represent the major soils within a map unit delineation. Minor components make up the balance of the map unit. Great differences in soil properties can occur between map unit components and within short distances. Minor components may be very different from the major components. Such differences could significantly affect use and management of the map unit. Minor components may or may not be documented in the database. The results of aggregation do not reflect the presence or absence of limitations of the components which are not listed in the database. An on-site investigation is required to identify the location of individual map unit components. For each of a map unit's components, a corresponding composition is recorded. A composition of 60 indicates that the corresponding component typically makes up approximately 60% of the map unit. Percent composition is a critical factor in some, but not all, aggregation methods. For the attribute being aggregated, the first step of the aggregation process is to derive one attribute value for each of a map unit's components. From this set of component attributes, the next step of the aggregation process derives a single value that represents the map unit as a whole. Once a single value for each map unit is derived, a thematic map for soil map units can be generated. Aggregation must be done because, on any soil map, map units are delineated but components are not. The aggregation method "Dominant Condition" first groups like attribute values for the components in a map unit. For each group, composition is set to the sum of the composition of all components participating in that group. These groups now represent "conditions" rather than components. The attribute value associated with the group with the highest cumulative composition is returned. If more than one group shares the highest cumulative composition, the corresponding "tie-break" rule determines which value should be returned. The "tie-break" rule indicates whether the lower or higher group value should be returned in the case of a composition tie. The result returned by this aggregation method represents the dominant Page 7 of 8

8 returned in the case of a composition tie. The result returned by this aggregation method represents the dominant condition throughout the map unit only when no tie has occurred. The tie-break rule indicates which value should be selected from a set of multiple candidate values, or which value should be selected in the event of a composition tie. Page 8 of 8

Surface Texture. Layer Option: Surface Layer Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Tie-break Rule: Lower

Surface Texture. Layer Option: Surface Layer Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Tie-break Rule: Lower name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 Gravelly loam 45, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 Silty clay loam 100 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 Silty clay loam 100 4A Naples

More information

Drainage Class. Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Tie-break Rule: Higher. Ontario County, New York Survey Area Version and Date: 13-09/24/2016

Drainage Class. Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Tie-break Rule: Higher. Ontario County, New York Survey Area Version and Date: 13-09/24/2016 unit name unit 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 Poorly drained 55, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 Well drained 90 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 Moderately well drained

More information

Percent Silt. Ontario County, New York Survey Area Version and Date: 13-09/24/2016

Percent Silt. Ontario County, New York Survey Area Version and Date: 13-09/24/2016 name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 10.9 45, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 44.1 90 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 45.4 90 4A Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3

More information

Liquid Limit. Ontario County, New York Survey Area Version and Date: 13-09/24/2016

Liquid Limit. Ontario County, New York Survey Area Version and Date: 13-09/24/2016 name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 19.9 45, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 31.4 90 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 37.3 90 4A Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3

More information

Linear Extensibility

Linear Extensibility name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 1.5 45, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 1.5 90 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 1.5 90 4A Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3 1.5

More information

Cation-Exchange Capacity (CEC-7)

Cation-Exchange Capacity (CEC-7) name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 4.5 45, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 9.4 90 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 11.9 90 4A Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3 14.3

More information

Depth to a Selected Soil Restrictive Layer

Depth to a Selected Soil Restrictive Layer 1A 2A 3A 4A 5A 12D 13F 14D 15A 15B 16A 16B 16C 18A 19A 20A 24A 24B 24C 24D 25A 25B 25C 25D 25E 26B 27B 31A 31B 31C 31D 32A 32B 33A 33B 33C 33D 33E 34A 35A 35B Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3, frequently

More information

Depth to Any Soil Restrictive Layer

Depth to Any Soil Restrictive Layer 1A 2A 3A 4A name Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3, frequently flooded Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3 5A Wayland soils complex,

More information

Farmland Classification

Farmland Classification name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 Not prime farmland 100, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 All areas are prime farmland 100 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 All areas

More information

K Factor, Whole Soil

K Factor, Whole Soil name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3.10 45, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3.49 90 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3.43 90 4A Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3.43 90

More information

Percent Clay. Ontario County, New York Survey Area Version and Date: 13-09/24/2016

Percent Clay. Ontario County, New York Survey Area Version and Date: 13-09/24/2016 name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 5.3 45, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 19.7 90 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 25.3 90 4A Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3

More information

Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity (Ksat), Standard Classes

Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity (Ksat), Standard Classes name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 70.7261 45, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 3.1399 90 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 4.1265 90 4A Naples Creek silty clay loam,

More information

Effective Cation-Exchange Capacity (ECEC)

Effective Cation-Exchange Capacity (ECEC) 1A 2A 3A 4A name Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3, frequently flooded Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3 5A Wayland soils complex,

More information

Range Production (Unfavorable Year)

Range Production (Unfavorable Year) name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 45, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 4A Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3 5A Wayland soils complex,

More information

Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR)

Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR) name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 0.0 45, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 0.0 90 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 0.0 90 4A Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3 0.0

More information

Electrical Conductivity (EC)

Electrical Conductivity (EC) name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 0.0 45, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 0.0 90 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 0.0 90 4A Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3 0.0

More information

Hydrologic Soil Group

Hydrologic Soil Group name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 A/D 85, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 C 90 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 C/D 90 4A Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3 B/D

More information

Potential for Seedling Mortality

Potential for Seedling Mortality 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently flooded reasons High Fluvaquents, frequently flooded 45% Wayland 10% Naples Creek 5% 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes

More information

Erosion Hazard (Off-Road, Off-Trail)

Erosion Hazard (Off-Road, Off-Trail) 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently flooded reasons Slight Fluvaquents, frequently flooded 45% Udifluvents, frequently flooded 40% Wayland 10% Naples Creek 5% 2A Geneseo

More information

Oneida County Soil Survey ID Number Name Slope/Descriptor 55A Adams Loamy Sand 0-3% slopes 55B Adams Loamy Sand 3-8% slopes 55C Adams Loamy Sand

Oneida County Soil Survey ID Number Name Slope/Descriptor 55A Adams Loamy Sand 0-3% slopes 55B Adams Loamy Sand 3-8% slopes 55C Adams Loamy Sand Oneida County Soil Survey ID Number Name Slope/Descriptor 55A Adams Loamy Sand 0-3% slopes 55B Adams Loamy Sand 3-8% slopes 55C Adams Loamy Sand 8-15% slopes 55D Adams Loamy Sand 15-25% slopes 55E Adams

More information

Any County, New York. Custom Soil Resource Report for. Homer Vegetable Research Farm. United States Department of Agriculture

Any County, New York. Custom Soil Resource Report for. Homer Vegetable Research Farm. United States Department of Agriculture United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other

More information

Custom Soil Resource Report for Tompkins County, New York

Custom Soil Resource Report for Tompkins County, New York United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other

More information

Lecture 5: Introduction to Soil Classification; Soil Physical Properties

Lecture 5: Introduction to Soil Classification; Soil Physical Properties Lecture 5: Introduction to Soil Classification; Soil Physical Properties Soil Classification Argillic Horizon Alfisols Moderately leached soils with a clay-rich B-horizon Typically found in forests Andisols

More information

Draft Resource Report 7 Soils. FERC Docket No.PF Pre-filing draft October Public

Draft Resource Report 7 Soils. FERC Docket No.PF Pre-filing draft October Public Spire STL Pipeline Project Draft Resource Report 7 Soils FERC Docket o.pf16-9-000 Pre-filing draft October 2016 Public RESOURCE REPORT 7 - SOILS SUMMARY OF FILIG IFORMATIO Information 1. Identify, describe,

More information

Area 3 Envirothon Soils Questions Key

Area 3 Envirothon Soils Questions Key Area 3 Envirothon Soils Questions Key 1. Soil aeration is the exchange of air in soil with air from the atmosphere. When a soil is well aerated, the air within the soil is very similar to the atmosphere

More information

Custom Soil Resource Report for Ulster County, New York

Custom Soil Resource Report for Ulster County, New York United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other

More information

Hydric Soils - Overview

Hydric Soils - Overview Hydric Soils - Overview The Hydric Soils section presents the most current information about hydric soils. It updates information that was previously published in "Hydric Soils of the United States" and

More information

108 40' 29'' W Soil Map Mesa County Area, Colorado 108 36' 55'' W 39 10' 11'' N 39 6' 31'' N 4331700 4332500 4333300 4334100 4334900 4335700 4336500 4337300 4338100 701100 701900 702700 703500 704300 705100

More information

Custom Soil Resource Report for State of Connecticut

Custom Soil Resource Report for State of Connecticut United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other

More information

Soil Taxonomy. A Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys. Second Edition, 1999 By Soil Survey Staff

Soil Taxonomy. A Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys. Second Edition, 1999 By Soil Survey Staff Soil Taxonomy A Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys Second Edition, 1999 By Soil Survey Staff United States Department of Agriculture Agriculture Handbook Natural

More information

Custom Soil Resource Report for State of Connecticut

Custom Soil Resource Report for State of Connecticut United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other

More information

SOIL ENGINEERING (EENV 4300)

SOIL ENGINEERING (EENV 4300) SOIL ENGINEERING (EENV 4300) Chapter 5 Classification of Soil Why Classification? Classification systems provide a common language to concisely express the general characteristics of soils, which are infinitely

More information

2016 Area 3 Envirothon Muskingum County Soils Test ANSWER KEY

2016 Area 3 Envirothon Muskingum County Soils Test ANSWER KEY 2016 Area 3 Envirothon Muskingum County Soils Test ANSWER KEY 1. The majority of the bedrock in Muskingum County is. a. sedimentary bedrock b. glacial bedrock c. igneous bedrock d. metamorphic bedrock

More information

Soil characteristics that influence nitrogen and water management

Soil characteristics that influence nitrogen and water management Section C Soil characteristics that influence nitrogen and water management Soil characteristics vary across the landscape Soils vary from one field to another, and often within the same field. Soil differences

More information

Soil Science Society of America Glossary of Soil Science Terms. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin.

Soil Science Society of America Glossary of Soil Science Terms. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin. REFERENCES Schoeneberger, P.J., Wysocki, D.A., Benham, E.C., and Broderson, W.D. 1998. Field Book for Describing and Sampling Soils. Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA, National Soil Survey Center,

More information

This section describes the geologic, soil, and topographic conditions of the Nation s four properties and immediately surrounding area.

This section describes the geologic, soil, and topographic conditions of the Nation s four properties and immediately surrounding area. Section 3.1: Land Resources A. INTRODUCTION This section describes the geologic, soil, and topographic conditions of the Nation s four properties and immediately surrounding area. B. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT

More information

Soil Classification: Outline

Soil Classification: Outline Soil Classification: Outline Introduction Soil moisture regimes Soil temperature regimes The Soil Taxonomy Diagnostic horizons soil orders Why Classify? Organize knowledge in an attempt to find order in

More information

Soils and their Relationship with Agriculture

Soils and their Relationship with Agriculture Soils and their Relationship with Agriculture Presentation created by Thomas Gallagher Modified by Hank Bignell Capital Area Agriculture and Horticulture Program Cornell University Cooperative Extension

More information

NRCS Soils Report. Grand River Gathering LLC K28E Compressor Station. OA Project No

NRCS Soils Report. Grand River Gathering LLC K28E Compressor Station. OA Project No NRCS Soils Report Grand River Gathering LLC K28E Compressor Station OA Project No. 012-032 82 21 ½ Road Grand Junction, CO 81505 TEL 90.23.800 FAX 90.23.45 United States Department of Agriculture A product

More information

SOIL JUDGING MANUAL. Northeast Regional Collegiate Soil Judging Contest. The Pennsylvania State University. University Park, PA

SOIL JUDGING MANUAL. Northeast Regional Collegiate Soil Judging Contest. The Pennsylvania State University. University Park, PA SOIL JUDGING MANUAL Northeast Regional Collegiate Soil Judging Contest The Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA October 25 and 26, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE... 1 GENERAL INFORMATION...

More information

Custom Soil Resource Report for Orange County, New York, and Sussex County, New Jersey

Custom Soil Resource Report for Orange County, New York, and Sussex County, New Jersey United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other

More information

Soil Properties That Distinguish Ecological Sites

Soil Properties That Distinguish Ecological Sites Soil Properties That Distinguish Ecological Sites Mike Duniway USGS-Southwest Biological Science Center Canyonlands Research Station Moab, UT mduniway@usgs.gov Spokane, WA January 31, 2012 Ecological Sites

More information

Section 1. Judging the soil pit (questions 1-4)

Section 1. Judging the soil pit (questions 1-4) CONNECTICUT ENVIROTHON 2009 SOILS QUESTIONS Please select the best response to the following questions. There are 25 questions; each question is worth 4 points. Section 1. Judging the soil pit (questions

More information

Custom Soil Resource Report for Fond du Lac County, Wisconsin

Custom Soil Resource Report for Fond du Lac County, Wisconsin United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other

More information

A Comparative Study of the Latvian Soil Classification with WRB

A Comparative Study of the Latvian Soil Classification with WRB A Comparative Study of the Latvian Soil Classification with WRB KARKLINS Aldis Latvia University of Agriculture, 2 Liela street, LV 3001, Jelgava, Latvia Email: karklins@latnet.lv Abstract A comparative

More information

GUIDE TO SOIL TAXONOMY

GUIDE TO SOIL TAXONOMY GUIDE TO SOIL TAXONOMY Larry Morris Forest Soils Professor UGA WSF&NR This brief explanation of soil taxonomy was adapted and updated from a handout by Dr. J. A. Burger of V.P.I. who largely excerpted

More information

Soil Interpretations Erosion and Sedimentation Control Planning and Design Workshop

Soil Interpretations Erosion and Sedimentation Control Planning and Design Workshop Soil Interpretations Erosion and Sedimentation Control Planning and Design Workshop Presented by Richard Brooks Presentation prepared by Kristin May Resource Soil Scientists USDA-Natural Resources Conservation

More information

Custom Soil Resource Report for Pope County, Illinois

Custom Soil Resource Report for Pope County, Illinois United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other

More information

TAXONOMIC CLASS: Loamy-skeletal, mixed, mesic Vitrandic Durochrepts

TAXONOMIC CLASS: Loamy-skeletal, mixed, mesic Vitrandic Durochrepts ESRM311/SEFS507 Important Soil Series in Seattle Area ALDERWOOD SERIES The Alderwood series consists of moderately deep, moderately well drained soils formed in glacial till. Alderwood soils are on glacially

More information

Problems encountered when classifying the soils of Finland

Problems encountered when classifying the soils of Finland Problems encountered when classifying the soils of Finland YLI-HALLA 1 Markku and MOKMA 2 Delbert L. 1 MTT Agrifood Research Finland, FIN-31600 JOKIOINEN, Finland 2 Michigan State University, Department

More information

Custom Soil Resource Report for Pope County, Illinois

Custom Soil Resource Report for Pope County, Illinois United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other

More information

Making Sense of Soil Series

Making Sense of Soil Series Making Sense of Soil Series Larry A. Morris Forest Soils Professor UGA WSF&NR The type, organization, and degree of development of soil horizons (layers) we observe in a soil profile such as pictured below

More information

Custom Soil Resource Report for Franklin County, Washington

Custom Soil Resource Report for Franklin County, Washington United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other

More information

BENNING ROAD & BRIDGES TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS NRCS SOIL RESOURCE REPORT DRAFT MAY 2016

BENNING ROAD & BRIDGES TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS NRCS SOIL RESOURCE REPORT DRAFT MAY 2016 BENNING ROAD & BRIDGES TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS NRCS SOIL RESOURCE REPORT DRAFT MAY 2016 United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative

More information

Custom Soil Resource Report for Southampton County, Virginia

Custom Soil Resource Report for Southampton County, Virginia United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other

More information

Custom Soil Resource Report for Columbia County, New York

Custom Soil Resource Report for Columbia County, New York United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other

More information

SOIL SEPARATES. Soil Evaluator Day 2, Presentation 3-3/27/2018. Soil Texture, Page 1 TITLE 5 SOIL EVALUATOR CERTIFICATION TRAINING SOIL TEXTURE

SOIL SEPARATES. Soil Evaluator Day 2, Presentation 3-3/27/2018. Soil Texture, Page 1 TITLE 5 SOIL EVALUATOR CERTIFICATION TRAINING SOIL TEXTURE Soil Evaluator Day 2, Presentation 3-3/27/18 TITLE 5 SOIL EVALUATOR CERTIFICATION TRAINING SOIL TEXTURE Prepared for: Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection By L.A. Spokas,

More information

Custom Soil Resource Report for Choctaw County, Oklahoma, and McCurtain County, Oklahoma

Custom Soil Resource Report for Choctaw County, Oklahoma, and McCurtain County, Oklahoma United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other

More information

SOIL DATA: Avondale. in Allen, TX. This information was taken from NRCS web soil survey of Collin County, Texas.

SOIL DATA: Avondale. in Allen, TX. This information was taken from NRCS web soil survey of Collin County, Texas. SOIL DATA: Avondale in Allen, TX This information was taken from NRCS web soil survey of Collin County, Texas. United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service in cooperation with Texas

More information

Custom Soil Resource Report for Lane County Area, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Lane County Area, Oregon United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other

More information

Custom Soil Resource Report for Hancock County Area, Maine

Custom Soil Resource Report for Hancock County Area, Maine United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other

More information

September 20, 2016 Soils Investigation for Agricultural Designation Windemere Place, Missoula County, Montana

September 20, 2016 Soils Investigation for Agricultural Designation Windemere Place, Missoula County, Montana September 20, 201 Soils Investigation for Agricultural Designation Windemere Place, Missoula County, Montana The purpose of this report is to compare on-site soils of the proposed subdivision with the

More information

Soil Texture = %Sand, Silt & Clay in a soil.

Soil Texture = %Sand, Silt & Clay in a soil. Soils Soil Texture = %Sand, Silt & Clay in a soil. Soil texture is the single most important physical property of the soil. Knowing the soil texture alone will provide information about: 1) water flow

More information

Soil Horizons cont. Oa- highly decomposed Oi-undecomposed

Soil Horizons cont. Oa- highly decomposed Oi-undecomposed Soils Soil Basics Soil Horizons Soil Horizons cont. O Horizon: Or organic layer Organic layer of decomposing plant and animal tissue. Wooded upland areas have thin O horizons Wetlands may have thick O

More information

2011 Wisconsin Envirothon Soils and Land Use Exam

2011 Wisconsin Envirothon Soils and Land Use Exam 2011 Wisconsin Envirothon Soils and Land Use Exam USE THE OCONTO COUNTY SOIL SURVEY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS 1-4 The Pensaukee River Wetland Complex is a mixture of state (Pensaukee Wildlife Area) and privately

More information

zone long enough to affect yield; gray colors below 48 in. horizon thick, dark gray or black

zone long enough to affect yield; gray colors below 48 in. horizon thick, dark gray or black Wetland & Sub baqueous Soils NRE M 665 Coastal & Wetland Ecology & Management 1 2 Soil Drainage Classes (USDA) Well Drained = Seasonal high water table (SHWT) not w/i root zone long enough to affect yield;

More information

Custom Soil Resource Report for Yamhill Area, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Yamhill Area, Oregon United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other

More information

Today. Climate. Role of water. Rainfall: Intensity and duration. Effective precipitation. (1)Parent materials + 4 other factors of soil formation

Today. Climate. Role of water. Rainfall: Intensity and duration. Effective precipitation. (1)Parent materials + 4 other factors of soil formation Today Models of soil formation Soil taxonomy Horizon descriptions (1)Parent materials + 4 other factors of soil formation Climate Topography Time Biota Can be interrelated and interact Climate Moisture

More information

SOILS IN URBAN / SUBURBAN LANDSCAPES. Lisa Krall Soil Scientist CT USDA NRCS Tolland, CT

SOILS IN URBAN / SUBURBAN LANDSCAPES. Lisa Krall Soil Scientist CT USDA NRCS Tolland, CT SOILS IN URBAN / SUBURBAN LANDSCAPES Lisa Krall Soil Scientist CT USDA NRCS Tolland, CT What is Urban Soil? Is This Soil? Is This Soil? active gravel pit pavement and buildings vegetated roadside areas

More information

Custom Soil Resource Report for Cibola Area, New Mexico, Parts of Cibola, McKinley, and Valencia Counties

Custom Soil Resource Report for Cibola Area, New Mexico, Parts of Cibola, McKinley, and Valencia Counties United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other

More information

NRCS Soils Report. Encana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc. C19 Injection Well. OA Project No

NRCS Soils Report. Encana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc. C19 Injection Well. OA Project No NRCS Soils Report Encana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc. C19 Injection Well OA Project No. 012-0178 826 21 ½ Road Grand Junction, CO 81505 TEL 970.263.7800 FAX 970.263.7456 United States Department of Agriculture

More information

Custom Soil Resource Report for Kane County, Illinois

Custom Soil Resource Report for Kane County, Illinois United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other

More information

Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States: For All Soils. Field Indicators. Indicators for all soils regardless of texture

Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States: For All Soils. Field Indicators. Indicators for all soils regardless of texture Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States: For All Soils From Vasilas, L.M., G.W. Hurt, and C.V. Noble. 2010. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States (Version 7.0), USDA, NRCS,

More information

HORT 102: Soil Properties. Cultivated Plants: Lecture 15. [Teresa Koenig] Slide #: 1 Slide Title: Intro Information Slide

HORT 102: Soil Properties. Cultivated Plants: Lecture 15. [Teresa Koenig] Slide #: 1 Slide Title: Intro Information Slide HORT 102: Soil Properties Cultivated Plants: Lecture 15 [Teresa Koenig] Slide #: 1 Slide Title: Intro Information Slide Title: Lecture 15 Soil Properties Speaker: Teresa Koenig Created by: Teresa Koenig,

More information

Custom Soil Resource Report for Daviess County, Missouri

Custom Soil Resource Report for Daviess County, Missouri United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other

More information

Custom Soil Resource Report for Craighead County, Arkansas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Craighead County, Arkansas United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other

More information

Appendix 10A Soil Associations

Appendix 10A Soil Associations 1 2 Appendix 10A Associations Associations 1 Appendix 10A. Associations Association Description Alameda County Group 1 - s of the uplands ly sloping to very steep, brownish and dark gray, moderately deep

More information

Soil testing Page 1. Contrary to what is widely believed, the colour of the soil reveals very little about its fertility.

Soil testing Page 1. Contrary to what is widely believed, the colour of the soil reveals very little about its fertility. Soil testing Page 1 Soil The Basics Soil is the uppermost surface of the earth, which has been slowly transformed by decomposition due to the effects of weather, vegetation and human activities. The parent

More information

Custom Soil Resource Report for Hinds County, Mississippi

Custom Soil Resource Report for Hinds County, Mississippi United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other

More information

3. What are the five master horizons? Give distinguishing features of each. 5. List three means by which plant roots come into contact with nutrients.

3. What are the five master horizons? Give distinguishing features of each. 5. List three means by which plant roots come into contact with nutrients. Study Questions Exam 1 1. What are the four general components of soil? 2. Define regolith and solum. 3. What are the five master horizons? Give distinguishing features of each. 4. What is meant by an

More information

Custom Soil Resource Report for Kent County, Maryland

Custom Soil Resource Report for Kent County, Maryland United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other

More information

Field Manual for Soil Type Identification

Field Manual for Soil Type Identification Soil Fertility Evaluation/Advisory Service in Negara Brunei Darussalam Field Manual for Soil Type Identification CSIRO Land and Water Department of Agriculture 2008 Brunei Darussalam Copyright and Disclaimer

More information

Soils of Randolph County, Arkansas B.Dixon, T.H. Udouj, H.D. Scott, R.L. Johnson, and J.M. McKimmey

Soils of Randolph County, Arkansas B.Dixon, T.H. Udouj, H.D. Scott, R.L. Johnson, and J.M. McKimmey B.Dixon, T.H. Udouj, H.D. Scott, R.L. Johnson, and J.M. McKimmey INTRODUCTION Soil is one of the most important natural resources of Arkansas. Information on soil behavior is used in agriculture, engineering

More information

2 Older farm homes on the land

2 Older farm homes on the land 2 Older farm homes on the land LAND RANCHES EXCHANGES This ranch consists of 70 +/_ acres of level farmland. Prime 13700 POWERHOUSE RD POTTER VALLEY agricultural land at an attractive price. This property

More information

APPENDIX A SOIL RESOURCES REPORTS

APPENDIX A SOIL RESOURCES REPORTS APPENDIX A SOIL RESOURCES REPORTS United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department

More information

DO YOU KNOW YOUR SOILS? (Rev. 10/11)

DO YOU KNOW YOUR SOILS? (Rev. 10/11) DO YOU KNOW YOUR SOILS? (Rev. 10/11) Circle all the correct answers. 1. What is the layer normally present on the surface of the soil in cropped fields? a. O c. Ap e. B g. R b. A d. E f. C 2. Available

More information

Custom Soil Resource Report for Polk County, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Polk County, Oregon United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other

More information

EXAMPLE Point A: Sandy Loam: 65% Sand _ 20% Silt _ 15% Clay. Point B: %Sand % Silt % Clay. Point C: %Sand % Silt % Clay. Point D: %Sand % Silt % Clay

EXAMPLE Point A: Sandy Loam: 65% Sand _ 20% Silt _ 15% Clay. Point B: %Sand % Silt % Clay. Point C: %Sand % Silt % Clay. Point D: %Sand % Silt % Clay SOIL TEXTURE Refers to proportions of sand, silt and clay size particles. These proportions determine water infiltration rates, permeability rates, and water holding rates. Using a soil texture triangle.

More information

URBAN SOILS & SEATTLE EXAMPLES

URBAN SOILS & SEATTLE EXAMPLES Class Results - Mystery Soil #1 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Sandy Clay Loam Sandy Loam Silty Loam Class Results - Mystery Soil #2 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Silty Clay Clay Loam Sandy Sandy Silty Sandy Silty Loamy Loam Clay

More information

Custom Soil Resource Report for Orange County, Virginia

Custom Soil Resource Report for Orange County, Virginia United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other

More information

Custom Soil Resource Report for Gallia County, Ohio

Custom Soil Resource Report for Gallia County, Ohio United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other

More information

Custom Soil Resource Report for Centre County, Pennsylvania

Custom Soil Resource Report for Centre County, Pennsylvania United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other

More information

HYDRIC SOILS OF SOUTH DAKOTA REVISED DECEMBER 15, 1995 (THE "HYDRIC CRITERIA NUMBER" COLUMN INDICATES WHAT CAUSED THE SOIL TO BE INCLUDED IN THE HYDRIC LIST. SEE THE "CRITERIA FOR HYDRIC SOILS" TO DETERMINE

More information

Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No Waiau

Topoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No Waiau This Technical Data Sheet describes the typical average properties of the specified soil. It is essentially a summary of information obtained from one or more profiles of this soil that were examined and

More information

Custom Soil Resource Report for Hamilton County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Hamilton County, Texas United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other

More information

Homework Activity Jar Test for Soil Texture

Homework Activity Jar Test for Soil Texture Homework Activity Jar Test for Soil Texture Background: 1. What is soil? 2. What natural factors influence the formation of soil? 3. How will the depth of each horizon in your soil profile affect your

More information

12/11/2008. HYDRIC SOILS: Soil Parameters Used for Jurisdictional Delineation. Objectives

12/11/2008. HYDRIC SOILS: Soil Parameters Used for Jurisdictional Delineation. Objectives HYDRIC SOILS: Soil Parameters Used for Jurisdictional Delineation Andrew Harley, Ph.D. andrew.harley@wspgroup.com & Lyndon C. Lee, Ph.D., PWS lyndon.lee@wspgroup.com Objectives Introduce concepts & procedures

More information

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clark County, Missouri

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clark County, Missouri United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other

More information

BC Soil Information Finder Tool. Questions

BC Soil Information Finder Tool. Questions BC Soil Information Finder Tool Questions 1 What is the Soil Information Finder Tool?... 2 2 How accurate is the information for a point on the map?... 3 3 What does Soil Erosion Potential mean?... 4 4

More information