SUMMARY MEETING. The following is a compilation of voting results from all five visioning sessions.

Similar documents
4. INDUSTRIAL 53 CASTLE ROCK DESIGN

Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center

INSTITUTIONAL USE DESIGN COMPATIBILITY TECHNIQUES

B L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development

City of Farmington. Downtown Plan. Amendment to the 1998 Master Plan Adopted October 11, 2004

TEAM INPUT SUMMARY. Postcard Image?

4.0 Design Guidelines For The Village Centre. South fields Community Architectural Design Guidelines Town of Caledon

EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

The Village. Chapter 3. Mixed Use Development Plan SPECIFIC PLAN

Aloha Tomorrow Study (2017)

Section 9 NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN

Urban Design Brief. 875 Wellington Road. Proposed One-Storey Fast Food Restaurant and Two-Storey Restaurant. Wellington Harlech Centre Inc.

E. RURAL COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL PARK MODEL

RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES

6. BUILDINGS AND SPACES OF HUMAN SCALE

Port Lavaca Future Land Use

SECTION II SECTION II STATEMENT OF GOALS, OBJECTIVES, PRINCIPLES, ASSUMPTIONS, POLICIES AND STANDARDS

PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THIS CHAPTER PUBLIC REALM

The Vision. Photo provided by The Minervini Group. 46 Vision, Objectives & Strategies

Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

appendix and street interface guidelines

Zoning Code Issues Prioritization

CENTRAL CITY NEIGHBORHOOD Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist

Village Center Zoning. Town of Sutton, MA June 15, 2016

Nelson Residential Street Frontage Guideline

2.0 AREA PLANS. Lakeside Business District. Lakeside Business District Land Use Categories:

Analysis of Environs of 1000 New York Street, German Methodist Episcopal Church

elk grove design guidelines Table Contents

The open space system should provide connective elements, relate to natural resources, and enhance the suburban character of the landscape..

City Plan Commission Briefing #2

Olde Towne Vision Plan

A Healthy Future Walkability Through Community Design. Fit Families North Carolina October 18, 2004

Blood Alley Square/Trounce Alley Redesign

MIDTOWN MIXED-USE VILLAGE. TECHNICAL DATA SHEET COMPONENT C-1 FOR PUBLIC HEARING - PETITION NUMBER Project No RZ1.1. Issued.

CHAPTER 12 DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS

Urban Design 9Identity

Proposed Reconstruction of Cleveland s Public Square

Eastcreek Farm. Planned Development Standards September, 2014

New Street Proposed Redevelopment Architecture & Urban Design Brief

Architectural and Appearance Design Manual. Town of Lexington, SC 1

II. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES Site Plan and Design Review Principles Checklist

CHAPTER FIVE COMMUNITY DESIGN

Revitalizing Urban Main Streets

5.1 Site Plan Guidelines

Urban Design & Placemaking

South fields. Community Architectural Design Guidelines. The Planning Partnership

Chapter PEDESTRIAN COMMERCIAL (PC) ZONING DISTRICT

Housing Development at Balloonagh Tralee Co Kerry

Citizen Advisory Group Meeting 5: Land Use April 14, 2011

Metro. Activity Center Design Guidelines. Recommendations For Developing Focused, Mixed-Use Commercial/Residential Centers

It Takes A Village.. Preserving Rural Character In Standish

Proposed for Vic West Neighbourhood Plan. Design Guidelines for Intensive Residential Development - Townhouse and Attached Dwelling

Broadway District Specific Plan. Community Workshop #2 February 23,2016

SECTION TWO: Overall Design Guidelines

VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION

Appendix D North Road/N. Leroy Street Subarea Plan

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF REPORT

Small Area Plan. South Gateway

V. Vision and Guiding Principles

Urban Design Manual PLANNING AROUND RAPID TRANSIT STATIONS (PARTS) Introduction. Station Study Areas

Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG)

A. Background Summary of Existing Challenges and Potential Possibilities. 1. Summary of Existing Assets and Potential Opportunities

CITY OF MERCER ISLAND DESIGN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

The Lower SaLuda Greenway

City of Fairfax, Virginia City Council Work Session

Development Agreement Public Meeting. June 26, 2013

Draft Masterplan Consultation Report Summer 2015 Spring (Updated following community review)

REZONING APPLICATION MPD SUPPLEMENT

UV120 January 30th, Charrette Findings

COMMUNITY DESIGN. GOAL: Create livable and attractive communities. Intent

CENTERS AND CORRIDORS

Town of Cedarburg Design Guidelines & Standards Commercial / Multi Family / Senior Care /Institutional/ Government Facilities Adopted August 6, 2014

Chapter 1 - General Design Guidelines CHAPTER 1 GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINES

Numerical Feedback on Graphic Examples, Sorted by Ranking

Anchorage Citizens Coalition Title 21, Module 2. Questions (third set, as of 4/11/04)

SUBCHAPTER 4-B GUIDELINES FOR THE B-3 COMMERCIAL CHARACTER AREA

section five BEAUTIFICATION PLAN

Urban Design Guidelines Townhouse and Apartment Built Form

Tonight s Agenda. Summary Presentation Open House. Group Discussion Next Steps: online community wide survey

Planning Board Briefing

2 January 13, 2010 Public Hearing APPLICANT: AUTOBELL CAR WASH, INC

13. New Construction. Context & Character

SUMMARY OF KEY POINTS FROM PUBLIC OPINIONS EXPRESSED DURING THE MUNICIPAL PLAN REVIEW PUBLIC CONSULTATION SESSIONS

Major Development Plan

Horizon 2035 Land Use and Transportation Element

New-Cast Mixed-use Development Proposal King Street West, Newcastle, Ontario

Schedule B to Report PLS

Town Center Design Guidelines

providing proof of liability insurance, indemnifying the City from any claims or liabilities arising from use of City property.

D1 September 11, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT:

4.1.3 LAND USE CATEGORIES

ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts

City of Charlottesville

NORTH NEIGHBORHOOD PUD

Housing and Coach House Guidelines - Ladner

Lower Merion Commercial Districts Issues and Characteristics Handbook November 2013

Figure 3-1: Public Realm Plan

LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL

Lehigh Acres Land Development Regulations Community Planning Project

Transcription:

SUMMARY MEETING The following is a compilation of voting results from all five visioning sessions.

WHO ARE YOU? The next 10 graphs show compiled demographic information about the participants at all 5 visioning sessions.

This graph depicts the actual number of people as opposed to all other graphs which are represented in percentages.

The actual choices were: 1) I am concerned about growth and development in Otsego County. 2) 2) I want to learn more about planning for better growth. 3) I believe Otsego County needs to think regionally when it comes to growth and development.

TELL US WHAT YOU KNOW The next 11 graphs show compiled information from all five visioning sessions.

The participants were shown a list of development tools and then asked to rate (on the following scale) their perceived knowledge of each tool. SCALE:

Visual Preference PART ONE

Visual Preference The following images depict development of larger areas. The intent is to represent more community wide development patterns. Answers were based on each image (or image set) NOT on a comparison of the entire string of images. Participants were instructed to base their vote on GUT INSTINCT their initial reaction upon seeing the image.

Discussion surrounding this slide usually focused on whether participants based on their knowledge of the current zoning ordinance - thought development in the county would follow this pattern. At this point in time the chances are greater than 50/50 that growth in Otsego County will resemble this image.

Although the house, barn, and out buildings remain, the housing is really too close for an active farm to comfortably continue the farming operation. Residences this close to farming operations typically begin complaining about noise, dust, and chemicals the farmer may need to treat crops.

Homes in the fields Homes hidden in woods 1 2 Participants were asked to choose based on the idea that the same density was achieved using different development tools (like clustering etc)

Individual road access for each home Homes clustered with shared access road 1 2 Participants were asked to choose based on the idea that the same density was achieved using different development tools (like clustering and mixed housing types).

Conventional zoning with minimum lot size strictly adhered to Homes clustered with a mix of housing types to achieve a similar density 1 2 Participants were asked to choose based on the idea that the same density was achieved using different development tools (like clustering, mixed housing types, etc.).

Conventional zoning with residential & commercial utilizing individual access points Homes are clustered. Commercial moved parking behind buildings and shared access roads. 1 2 Participants were asked to choose based on the idea that the same density was achieved using different development tools (like clustering, mixed housing types, etc.).

Each home has individual access to a private dock on a body of water Homes are set back from the water and utilize a community dock 1 2 Participants were asked to choose based on the idea that the same density was achieved using different development tools (like clustering, conservation easements, etc.).

Commercial/light industrial with conventional zoning The same uses with parking behind the buildings and shared access roads 1 2 Participants were asked to choose based on the idea that the same density was achieved using different development tools (like shared access roads, preserved open space, etc.).

Homes on conventional lots 1 Homes are clustered preserving working orchards and farm fields, as well as a majority of tree cover. 2 Participants were asked to choose based on the idea that the same density was achieved using different development tools (like clustering, conservation easements, etc.).

Conventional zoning 1 Homes are clustered, each having a view and at least one property line adjacent to dedicated open space. 2 The client chose the clustered plan even though there were 4 less lots because there is perceived value in protected open space bordering private lots.

Homes on conventional lots Clustered residential with protected, usable open space 1 2 The clustered plan slightly reduced the lot size, added over 2 acres of usable open space and did not require extensive excavation to achieve desirable home-sites.

Visual Preference The next images depict more site specific kinds of development. The intent is to demonstrate how architectural & site details affect the overall desirability of a community. Answers were based on each image (or image set) NOT on a comparison of the entire string of images. Participants were told to base their vote on GUT INSTINCT their initial reaction upon seeing the image.

PHOTO BY: EDWARD T MCMAHON This image depicts a screened parking provision. Typically landscaping or some kind of wall can be used to camouflage a parking lot. If more greenery had been in the picture it may have gotten more favorable results. Regardless landscaping and screening for parking will help soften the look of commercial areas.

This home is not in a traditional neighborhood. There are large trees and more separation between neighbors. Some participants commented on the For Sale sign and made their decision based on their feelings about the sign being there.

PHOTO BY: EDWARD T MCMAHON Although this did not receive a favorable response the point is that CVS came into this town and blended their corporate identity into the existing community character.

In this case an apartment building follows an apparent sign ordinance creating a nice entrance identity.

Parking on the streets, street trees, and lighting work together to give this image distinction. The church and greenery acting as a terminus also add to the character.

PHOTO BY: ROD CORTWRIGHT A variety of housing types adds to the desirability of this topselling property. The denser housing pattern allows over 100 acres of open space to be preserved for the enjoyment of the residents. If open space and/or woodland preservation is a community goal then some type of denser development pattern will be necessary.

PHOTO BY: ROD CORTWRIGHT This is a scene dominated by the car. There are too many lanes to cross and no streetscape or pedestrian walkway to help a person feel secure as they make their way through town.

PHOTO BY: ROD CORTWRIGHT COMMUNITY CHARACTER The sidewalk, light post, and front porch are just a few of the things adding to the community character depicted in this image.

PHOTO BY: ROD CORTWRIGHT DENSITY This is an example of higher density housing. Housing options (some of them higher density) are necessary to achieve a vibrant, sustainable community.

PHOTO BY: ROD CORTWRIGHT CORPORATE IDENTITY STANDARDS More structure character, landscaping, and adherence to a sign standard is what most likely got this image a higher approval than other gas station images.

PHOTO BY: ROD CORTWRIGHT CORPORATE IDENTITY STANDARDS The structures lack character and the signage is overpowering. The station was allowed to follow its own corporate identity. The gas brand is different than the main building s identity.

PHOTO BY: EDWARD T MCMAHON CORPORATE IDENTITY STANDARDS This gas station was adhering to a community's standards. Although the majority of participants responded neutrally it still shows that if a community sets certain standards they can expect a different outcome in the built environment.

DENSITY Density is a necessary component in planning. Otsego County will have to decide what their higher density developments should look like.

PHOTO BY: ROD CORTWRIGHT SIGN ORDINANCES Here we have a great sidewalk with a spacious tree lawn giving that feeling of protection from the traffic. The cluttered look of all the signage detracts from the community character making it not such a desirable experience.

PHOTO BY: ROD CORTWRIGHT COMMUNITY CHARACTER The fence, light post, trees, and front porches add to the pedestrian friendly community character.

CORPORATE IDENTITY STANDARDS/NEW URBANISM It is possible for a community to incorporate ordinance standards that require brand identity to blend with a community s character and parking in the rear of buildings.

PHOTO BY: ROD CORTWRIGHT DENSITY All levels of density are valid. A community must determine where the varying levels are the most appropriate.

Visual Preference PART TWO The next images are a comparison of site specific kinds of development. The intent is to demonstrate how architectural & site details affect the overall desirability of a community. Answers were based on each image set NOT on a comparison of the entire string of images. Participants were instructed to base their vote on GUT INSTINCT their initial reaction upon seeing the image.

SET #1 1 PHOTO BY: EDWARD T MCMAHON 2 PHOTO BY: EDWARD T MCMAHON CORPORATE IDENTITY STANDARDS If a community has taken steps to incorporate corporate identity standards in their master plans and zoning ordinances, then they can expect a different look when national chains choose to come to their area.

SET #2 PHOTO BY: EDWARD T MCMAHON 1 2 PHOTO BY: EDWARD T MCMAHON CORPORATE IDENTITY STANDARDS CC If a community has taken steps to incorporate corporate identity standards in their master plans and zoning ordinances, then they can expect a different look when national chains choose to come to their area.

SET #3 PHOTO BY: EDWARD T MCMAHON 1 PHOTO BY: EDWARD T MCMAHON 2 CORPORATE IDENTITY STANDARDS If a community has taken steps to incorporate corporate identity standards in their master plans and zoning ordinances, then they can expect a different look when national chains choose to come to their area.

SET #4 1 PHOTO BY: ROD CORTWRIGHT 2 LANDSCAPING PROVISIONS Landscape provisions become especially important when large parking lots are proposed. A community can decide that the aesthetically pleasing addition of trees and landscape islands outweighs the additional burden for the snow plow.

SET #5 1 2 PHOTO BY: EDWARD T MCMAHON PHOTO BY: EDWARD T MCMAHON CORPORATE IDENTITY STANDARDS If a community has taken steps to incorporate corporate identity standards in their master plans and zoning ordinances. then they can expect a different look when national chains choose to come to their area.

SET #6 1 2 SIDEWALKS (#2) A wider sidewalk allows for gathering places outside. The awnings, lighting, and umbrellas give a sense of place and people are using the space.

SET #7 PHOTO BY: ROD CORTWRIGHT 1 2 PHOTO BY: ROD CORTWRIGHT SIDEWALKS Tree-lawns separating the sidewalk from the street provide a feeling of safety for pedestrians and allow street trees a better chance at growth and survival.

SET #8 1 2 PHOTO BY: ROD CORTWRIGHT PHOTO BY: ROD CORTWRIGHT SIDEWALKS The curbing, tree-lawn, and sidewalk seem to make the difference in this set. Again, this does not mean that a community must mandate these types of details for every development. They need to be cognizant of the fact that it was voted as desirable and incorporate it into appropriate areas.

SET #9 1 2 PHOTO BY: ROD CORTWRIGHT PHOTO BY: ROD CORTWRIGHT GARAGE PLACEMENT This set is about garage placement, although participants pointed out that the amount of landscaping affected their voting. This type of pattern (garages in the rear, sometimes accessed by alleyways) is an appropriate development pattern within established hamlets/villages or cities or areas where the community would like to create such an environment.

SET #10 1 2 PHOTO BY: ROD CORTWRIGHT DENSITY This set is primarily about density. If a community decides that open space, agricultural, or woodland preservation is a priority, density and clustering will most likely be incorporated into the community vision. Higher density is appropriate for some areas it does not mean that it becomes the only development pattern!

SET #11 PHOTO BY: EDWARD T MCMAHON 1 PHOTO BY: EDWARD T MCMAHON 2 SIGN ORDINANCES This set has to do with sign ordinances and how utilities are handled. Setbacks and landscape requirements also have an impact on the differences seen here.

EVALUATION RESPONSES (NEXT 8 GRAPHS)