M E E T I N G S U M M A R Y

Similar documents
Sea Level Rise Workshop #4 May 22, 2018 Venice Local Coastal Program SUMMARY

More than 30 adults and 19 children were involved in these community workshops.

Design Alternatives Workshop. Hilfiker Park Master Plan Workshop #2

Building Great Neighbourhoods. Strathcona

New York Avenue Streetscape and Trail Project Public Meeting #1 Summary

TASK FORCE MEETING #6 SUMMARY

RESEDA - WEST VAN NUYS COMMUNITY PLAN

Montana Rail Link Park

TOWN OF ATHERTON CIVIC CENTER MASTER PLAN

MEETING PURPOSE AND OVERVIEW

Community Visioning Workshop Prep

I-84 Karcher Interchange to Franklin Blvd Interchange Summary of Community Workshop #1 December 13, 2017

LOMA VISTA ROUND 1 - COMMUNITY WORKSHOP AND OPEN HOUSE SUMMARY

PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT & SIX THEMES OF THE PLAN

City of Los Angeles Department of Public Works

Design Considerations

Wallgraphic. Reduced Noise Uncertainty in source Sound Walls o Dedicate funds to upgrade sound wall Loading Area Vibration Power Station Quiet Zone

Long Branch-Wayne Local Park Renovation Project

Don Mills Crossing Study and Celestica Lands Development Application Community Meeting, Open House, and Breakout Discussions

Expo Light Rail Line. Expo Line Community Meeting Phase 2 Design Update November 2011

REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION

Summary Community Workshop #1 Fruitvale San Antonio Senior Center Monday, March 23, :00-9:00 p.m.

Martin Pastucha, Director of Public Works Karen Ginsberg, Director of Community and Cultural Services

Welcome! MILLENNIUM LINE BROADWAY EXTENSION. Over the next 30 years, Metro Vancouver will welcome 1 million new residents and 600,000 new jobs.

Presentation of the Staff Draft. July 17, 2014 SSRVP Team, Area 3

Metro 2010 Pedestrian Symposium Walking into the Future City

Maplewood Avenue Downtown Complete Street Project

Summary Community Workshop #6 Beacon Day School Saturday, November 14, :00 a.m. 12:00 p.m.

Technical Team Meeting MEETING SUMMARY

AVONDALE ESTATES GREENSPACE AD-HOC COMMITTEE

West Loop. Neighborhood Plan. Prepared by: Neighbors of West Loop, Chicago, IL August 14, 2018

SECTION 4(f) DE MINIMIS DOCUMENTATION

Clair-Maltby Community visioning

Port Lavaca Future Land Use

These meeting minutes summarize the community meeting held on February 22 nd, 2018 with the Greater Park Hill community.

EXPO LINE COMMUNITY WORKSHOPS NOVEMBER 27 TH & DECEMBER 3 RD Los Angeles Department of City Planning

Community Meeting #2.1

Public input has been an important part of the plan development process.

Draft Bergamot Area Plan

CCI Concerned Citizens Group, Inc. Report on Community Survey Regarding Future Use of CCI Property after Cleanup July 1, 2005

WARM SPRINGS PARK MASTER PLAN

-MEETING SUMMARY - 39th Ave. Open Channel Design Workgroup Meeting #1 June 15, :30 6:30 p.m. Meeting Purpose Welcome

Urban Design Manual 2.0 DRIVE-THROUGH FACILITIES. Background. Urban Design Challenges

Zoning Code Issues Prioritization

WELCOME. Lemoyne Middle School Redevelopment Project Public Engagement Meeting #2. August 20, 2018

Master Plan Visioning #1 Section 3 Informal amphitheater at Community Development Services Building. Section 3 MP Visioning #1

City of Charlottesville

Horizon 2035 Land Use and Transportation Element

Current City Warehouse Facility. City Market Re-Use Concept. Indoor Market/ Maker s Incubator 1.06 acres +/- Open Air Market 1.

Planning Board Briefing

Good Neighbor Plan Dallas Love Field Airport Transportation and Environment Committee

DRAFT. 10% Common Open Space

Blueprint Denver Task Force Meeting #

1 October Dear Citizens of Charlotte and Mecklenburg County,

Old Town Neighborhoods Plan. Choices Event Wednesday, December 9, 2015

Today Land & People. Northeast Nampa Gateway District. Employment. Land Use Characteristics. Demographics. Current Zoning

NOTES FROM PUBLIC MEETING #3 AUGUST 30, 2017

East Central Area Plan

PARDI MARKET PLAZA MASTER PLAN

Denver Moves: Transit Task Force

Steve, Following are our notes from the first two meetings with Montgomery County Planning Group:

South Meridian. Vision. Action

3.1 community vision. 3.3 required plan elements

Bethesda Downtown Plan

East Bayshore Road Neighbourhood

Tonight s Agenda. Disbrow Park & Facilities Master Plan

December 1, 2014 (revised) Preliminary Report -- Thomas Jefferson Site Evaluation

Wentworth Point July Community Information Session Feedback Summary

Johnson Street Bridge Public Realm Update

water that enters our streams during storms. Any water the rain garden can t accept will continue into the storm sewer system.

SMALL LOT DESIGN STANDARDS. An Illustrated Working Draft for Test Implementation

California Historic Route 66 Needles to Barstow Corridor Management Plan. February 2014 Public Meetings Summary DRAFT

Nokomis Hiawatha Regional Park Master Plan and Park Improvements


Public Workshop #2 Summary

Subject: Expo Light Rail - Revision of the Terminus Station North Entrance Design

CIP Meeting 3 Summary April 28, 2017 Page 1 of 7

CORPORATE REPORT. NO: R137 COUNCIL DATE: June 29, 2015 REGULAR COUNCIL. TO: Mayor & Council DATE: June 24, 2015

TASK FORCE MEETING #10 SUMMARY

Parker Pine Curve Master Plan January 28th, 2009, Public Workshop Comments

Reimagining Arnolds Creek. Community engagement report. May 2018

Cover Planning. January I-70 East Final Environmental Impact Statement

Town of Westport. Design Guidelines Development Committee Public Informational Presentation

Public Forum. Kelley s Corner: The Corner that Connects Us. The Cecil Group. March 7, Acton 2020 Town of Acton.

Health and the Built Environment Placemaking Workshop, February 2018

City Council March 27, Parks, Recreation, and Trails Master Plan

FACT SHEET: COMMUNITY INPUT S IMPACT ON THE DESIGN FOR THE OBAMA PRESIDENTIAL CENTER

Central Highfields Master Plan

9 th Street Sub Area Plan

City Plan Commission Briefing #2

South th E ast Communit ity Centre (SECC)

Union Station Master Plan Task 2 Briefing

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

Task Force Meeting December 11, 2007

Ridgewood Precinct Plan

Atlanta BeltLine. Subareas 9 & 10. Master Plan Updates. March 26, Washington Park Jamboree 1

SPRINGHILL LAKE TRANSIT VILLAGE

Planned Development Review Revisions (Project No. PLNPCM )

Britannia Farm Master Plan Refresh September 21 st 2016 Public Consultation #2 Summary Report

PARDI MARKET PLAZA MASTER PLANS

Transcription:

EXPO Maintenance Facility Buffer Zone City of Santa Monica M E E T I N G S U M M A R Y OVERVIEW On Tuesday, a was held at Virginia Avenue Park in the City of Santa Monica to provide an update on the EXPO Maintenance Facility Buffer Zone and gather further feedback from the Pico Neighborhood on the preferred use for the Buffer Zone. The primary purpose of this workshop was to confirm the vision for the Buffer Zone, discuss the characteristics of potential uses that would be amenable to members of the neighborhood, and discuss the timing and phasing of implementation. At this meeting, an update was also provided by the City of Santa Monica on progress made up to this point and the continued commitment by the City to ensure an inclusive and transparent process. The Maintenance Design Group (MDG), the design consultant for EXPO s Maintenance Facility, also gave a brief update on facility design and indicated that the next community workshop would occur in January. Following the brief introductions and update from the City of Santa Monica, the Pico Neighborhood Association and the Expo team, meeting facilitator Esmeralda Garcia reviewed highlights from the April 28, 2011. She summarized themes that emerged from the meeting including shared community goals for the use of the buffer and that there seemed to be a common theme to use the buffer for park/open space. Ms. García explained that attendees would break out into smaller groups to discuss open space characteristics of the buffer zone. She then asked Kate Vernez, Deputy City Manager for Santa Monica, to review parameters for the site so that each group could discuss characteristics appropriate to the size of the buffer and the resources available. Ms. García directed attendees to join one of three tables lead by a City staff facilitator. Site plans were provided at each table and a note-taker captured comments on flipcharts. BREAKOUT GROUPS The breakout groups addressed three different questions. The following summarizes their comments: Page 1 of 6

Part 1: Confirm Possible Uses and Prioritize All groups reached consensus that the buffer zone should be used for Park/Open Space. The following were identified as priorities for the buffer zone and its characteristics: The sound wall should be built as soon as possible. There should be a temporary wall built during construction Adding vegetation to the buffer zone is a great priority. This should be done as soon as possible. Part 2: Open Space Characteristics All of the breakout groups had similar recommendations for characteristics of the open space uses in the Buffer Zone. The following summarizes their comments: Walls The sound wall should be large/tall enough to shield two-story homes nearby. Any walls should have vegetation to screen them. Landscaping and Lighting Large trees along the sound wall. Tree Banking. Pedestrian Lighting. natural feel for landscaping. Participants expressed their thought that trees with big leaves could alleviate noise. Native shrubs and flowers - choose plantings that will attract butterflies and bees. Other Uses A community garden was an idea that was repeated in all breakout groups. The following comments were specific to this particular use: Area should be large enough for many plots. There is a long waiting list for garden plots in the city. Participants expressed their recommendation that the City allow local residents to have priority over any available garden plots in the Buffer. Page 2 of 6

Garden plots shouldn t take up the whole park. Community garden should be in an area of limited visibility. Activities such as gardening class could be part of the Garden. Activity Specific Uses There were several activity specific uses that were recommended, many of which were repeated at several breakout group tables. They included: Jogging/Walking Path. Lawn Bowling, Pickle Ball court Skatepark Bike and/or Rollerblading lane Dog walking (not an off-leash Dog Park) Dog Run BBQ/picnic area Free-cycle area Exercise stations Children s play area (specifically for toddlers) Part 3: Phasing and Timing A shorter construction time frame is preferred. There should be careful consideration in the placement of uses in the Buffer Zone to make them accessible and ensure that they serve the local neighborhood. Participants expressed their concern that they did not want to have to wait for the completion of the maintenance yard for the Buffer Zone to be turned into Open Space. MDG indicated that the Maintenance Facility construction timeframe could be reduced from approximately 36 to 24 months is EXPO is able to use the Buffer site during construction. Other Comments As mitigation for the impacts of the maintenance facility and new buffer zone use, medians should be constructed on Exposition Blvd. to impede through traffic. In addition, other traffic calming strategies should be considered. Page 3 of 6

Residents were concerned about cut through traffic problems. Parking was an issue that they would like the City to address based on the final characteristics of the Buffer Zone. There should be no day care at the Buffer. Design of any seating is very important. Many participants noted they did not want any benches. No bathrooms. Meeting Facilitator Esmeralda Garcia asked each of the groups to briefly summarize their comments and present them to the group. Each table presented their summarized comments and presented their marked up site plans to the group. Each map is presented below. Page 4 of 6

Page 5 of 6

NEXT STEPS At the conclusion of the meeting, Kate Vernez of the City of Santa Monica thanked all attendees for continuing to participate in this process. She noted that the City would continue to hold Community meetings as this project continued. She also asked the group if they could provide any feedback on outreach to the community to ensure attendance at meetings. The following were suggested strategies: Postcards, two weeks in advance of a meeting. Door knocking, at least several days before a meeting. Neighbor to Neighbor outreach. COMMENT CARDS Comment cards were provided to all attendees for any additional comments they might have. Only one comment card was received, the following is a transcription of the comment card: I would most like greenery trees, shrubs, lawn, plants for beautification and quiet enjoyment of neighborhood. A Green Belt. I also like the idea of a walking path east/west along the buffer zone. I like the idea of exercise stations also. Page 6 of 6