Creating a New Care Label for Environmentally Friendly Professional Wetcleaning:

Similar documents
Encouraging Dry Cleaners to switch from PERC to Professional Wet Cleaning

Eco- Friendly. Convenience. Quality. OXXO CARE CLEANERS WHITE PAPER 2018

Electrolux Professional Textile Care. The Power of Water: a clean start for the textile care industry

NACT 287 Dry Cleaning

Consumer Awareness Survey of Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Programs in BC

SPOTLIGHT ON WATER CONSERVATION

DETECTIVE - Demonstration Textile CO2 Treatment Introduction Validation Effort LIFE00 ENV/NL/000797

Technical Training International Textiles Training September 2018 Ellen Roaldi Instructor

CARE LABEL RECOMMENDATIONS

Subject: Notification of Petroleum Dry Cleaning Machine Installation (SUN - 175)

AATCC TM Dimensional Changes of Fabrics after Home Laundering. AATCC TM Dimensional Changes of Garments after Home Laundering

ISO Textiles Domestic washing and drying procedures for textile testing

OxyScholar. Occidental College. Peter Sinsheimer. Cyrus Grout

IAEA SAFETY STANDARDS

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD NORME INTERNATIONALE

ISO 3758 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Textiles Care labelling code using symbols. Textiles Code d'étiquetage d'entretien au moyen de symboles

Estimating the Level of Free Riders in the Refrigerator Buy-Back Program

In Search of Standard Reference Materials (SRMs) for ASTM E05 Fire Standards by. Norman Alvares & Harry Hasegawa

HOME FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS. the future of fire safety here today

Energy Efficiency Schemes Brief Introduction

ORALITE Microprismatic Garment Tapes

Review Fire Test Report

National Survey on Consumer Spending on Landscape Services

National Radon Results: 1985 to 1999 Brian Gregory 1 Philip P. Jalbert, U.S. EPA

Re: Energy Conservation Standards for Residential Furnaces and Commercial Water Heaters; Docket No. EERE-2018-BT-STD-0018

PLANNING FOR COMMUNITY GARDENS IN ANCHORAGE

Testing coated fabrics

Unwanted Fire Alarms. Marty Ahrens National Fire Protection Association 1 Batterymarch Park Quincy, MA (617)

Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP) Space Heater Policy

HOME FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS. fire safety. the future of. here today

Instruction Manual for the Revolutionary Science RS-IF-203 Incufridge

FIREFIGHTER/ENGINEER

Building Performance Services

Single Room Occupancy Hotel Safety & Stabilization Task Force

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2017-NE-02-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

Review of U.S. state-level laws in requiring carbon monoxide alarms in residential settings

User Manual. Please read this User Manual and the Safety Information before operating the Soda Maker.

QUICKWASH PLUS. Accelerated Washing and Drying System

The Antifreeze Fire Sprinkler System Dilemma Eliminating One Issue has Opened the Door to Another. Jennifer Poynter, Esq. Charles B.

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

This is a preview - click here to buy the full publication

FLAMMABLE REFRIGERANTS UPDATE FOR HVAC&R EQUIPMENT IN NORTH AMERICA

associated environmental management

OREM CITY OREM UTOPIA SURVEY 2018

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

Shelter submission to the DCLG review of the Smoke and Carbon Monoxide Alarm (England) Regulations 2015

AHCARB803 Edaphic Interactions of Trees and Structures Form

User Guide. BlueairMedical FEATURING HEPASILENTª TECHNOLOGY

South Central Service Center

ENERGY STAR, EPA, DoE

IMO Resolution MSC 61(67): Annex 1: Part 2

Energy Efficient Homes: Laundry Area 1

TESTIMONY OF MARK CONNELLY

Small Business Assistance Program Metal Finishers Compliance Checklist

BS EN ISO : 2010

Water Heating, Boiler, and Furnace Cost Study (RES 19)

Numerical Simulation of Fluid Flow and Heat Transfer in a Water Heater

HKIE CPD Training Course (II) 23, 25 June and 7, 9 July 2009

CITY COUNCIL MEETING Olympia, Washington November 23, 2010

All Types - Automatic, semi-automatic and manual. All Types - Horizontal (front loaders) and Vertical Plane (top loader)

EC type approval protocol No. 4 Domestic washing and drying procedures for textiles toys intended for children under 36 months (Rev2)

REVIEW ON CONDENSER AIR LEAK TEST

Answer: B Objective: NFPA 472, (c), 4.2.3, 5.2.3(1); Level: Awareness, Operations Subject: Introduction; Chapter 1; Page 5

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND THE PURSUIT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMET IOME CHRISTA 1

MEMORANDUM. DATE: June 14, TO: Sponsors of the Massachusetts ENERGY STAR Appliances Program

ISO 3758 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Textiles Care labelling code using symbols. Textiles Code d'étiquetage d'entretien au moyen de symboles

VASHON-MAURY FIRE AND RESCUE Community Needs Survey Executive Summary March 2000

USEFUL RESOURCES: Applicability. Item o of section 150. Review-Definitions Section 101

Water Heating, Boiler, and Furnace Cost Study (RES 19)

BS EN : 2001 & IEC :2000

The Future of Smart Technology

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Iso In Plain English

Enviroclean Dry Cleaning Solution

BS 476: Part 6: 1989+A1:2009

UNEP s Role in Promoting Environmentally Sound Management of E-Waste

NFPA Fire Inspector I Study Guide

QUALITY & COMPETENCE. Over 70 years at your service

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION

Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Emissions of Perchloroethylene from Dry Cleaning Operations

There is Still Something in the Air Consumer Reports Article Raises New Concerns About Ionizers. By Jim Rosenthal, CAFS and Stevan Brown, CAFS

Safety Data Sheet 1. PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION. Product name: Product Number:

Green goes mainstream! Does the evidence support it?

Note: Verify that plastic bags are removed from filters, if equipped or installed, before first use (see page 8) CONTENTS

Codes And Standards Nfpa

BS EN ISO : 2010

OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS FOR:

RD:VMT:JMD 10/14/2015 RESOLUTION NO.

Report on First Revision June 2014 NFPA 5000

City of Saint Paul Recycle it Forward

Delaware Cooperative Extension Master Gardener Volunteer Educator Training Application Fall 2017

Appliance Standards Program Buildings Technology Office

IMESA: A LIFE BY YOUR SIDE

CEQA and Historic Preservation: A 360 Degree Review

NCEHSA Conference. Carbon Monoxide Detector Regulations for Lodging Establishments (S.L )

Smoke Alarms. Rev. A Copyright 2011 James D Peisker

Addressing Sound Masking Requirements in the National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code and UL Standards

Material Safety Data Sheet. acc. to ISO/DIS Printing date 01/26/2001 Reviewed on 03/28/2000

Test Report: ICL/CR15/11/087

Transcription:

Creating a New Care Label for Environmentally Friendly Professional Wetcleaning: Why Reliable Evidence Supports Its Required Use March 28, 2014 Federal Trade Commission Roundtable FTC Conference Center 601 New Jersey Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001 Peter Sinsheimer, Ph.D., MPH Executive Director Sustainable Technology & Policy Program 1

Definitions: Dry Cleaning and Professional Wet Cleaning Dry Cleaning A commercial process by which soil is removed from products or specimens in a machine which uses any solvent excluding water (e.g., petroleum, perchloroethylene, silicone, glycol ether, carbon dioxide, or aldehyde). The process also may involve adding moisture to the solvent, up to 75% relative humidity, hot tumble drying up to 160 degrees F (71 degrees C) and restoration by steam press or steam-air finishing. Professional Wetcleaning A commercial process for cleaning products or specimens in water carried out by professionals using special technology (cleaning, rinsing, and spinning), detergents, and additives to minimize adverse effects, followed by appropriate drying and restorative finishing procedures. 2

Why is professional wet cleaning environmentally friendly? Technology Professional Wet Cleaning Human Health & Environmental Hazard Air Regulations Health Regulations None Identified N/A Choose cleaning agents to min env impact Fire Regulations N/A CO 2 None Identified N/A Fee on CO 2 volume Permit Petroleum GreenEarth PCE npb Neur/eye/skin/resp irr Pers & aqu tox concern Mixtures of contain Susp carc & repro tox Liver/immune/nerv sys Persist in env Carcinogen Liver/kidney effects Neurotoxicity Pers in the env. Repro and dev tox Neur/eye/skin/resp irr Regulated Emits VOCs Registration Regulated Registration Regulated Permit Phase out Regulated Permit Fee for haz waste generated Fee for haz waste generated Fee for haz waste generated Fee for haz waste generated Permit Combustible (Class IIIA) Permit Combustible (Class IIIA) N/A Flam(Class I), NFPA rating 3 (Cite: Adopted from Alt Assessment, S.F Dept Env) 3

Professional Wetcleaning Process/Equipment Computer-Controlled Washing (8 manufacturers) Gentle agitation simulates hand washing Low water level and low temperature Dispensing System: Programmed to dispense precise amount of cleaning agents mixed with water Cleaning Agents Detergents Conditioners Sizing (9 manufacturers) Tensioning Presses: used to enhance restoration of constructed garments Moisture Sensor Drying Machine drying - precise moisture control Air drying expose garments to ambient air (7 manufacturers) (8 manufacturers) 4

Overall Findings on Commercial Viability of Professional Wet Cleaning Initial Study: 2000-2004 Dry cleaners switching to professional wet cleaning able to successfully wet clean over 99% of the Dry Clean and Dry Clean Only labeled garments. Operating costs and electricity use significantly lower after switching to PWC. Validation, Consistency, Generalizability: 2005-Present Across equipment models and detergents. Across geography throughout California, Mass, etc., across income levels. Over time 2000 to present. Created Profession of Professional Wetcleaning Skill set to successfully process full range of sensitive items labeled DC or DCO. Experience and expertise to accurately predict success or failure of new apparel in professional wet clean process. Professional Wetclean Association. 5

Should the FTC require or allow the use of a new Professional Wetclean label? FTC legal standard for requiring use of a particular care label: Must show: (1) The failure to list the method is prevalent. (2) The failure to list the method is deceptive or unfair. (3) The response of requiring a label must be appropriate and cost effective to address unfair or deceptive practice. * 65 Fed. Reg. 47261, 47269 (August 2, 2000) 6

1 st Criterion for requiring a label: Is the failure to list a method prevalent? 99+% apparel labeled DC or DCO successfully professionally wetcleaned. In US, not legal to label of garment Professional Wetclean. What if Professional Wetclean label is allowed but not required? ISO developed PWC label in 2007. Allowed to be used throughout Europe. Perfect natural experiment: Search countries where ISO Professional Wetclean label allowed for prevalence of label six years after label allowed. FTC Legal Standard for Requiring a Label 7

On-line search of apparel company web sites where ISO Professional Wetclean label is permitted FTC Legal Standard for Requiring a Label 8

2 nd Criterion for requiring a label: Is failure to list a method deceptive and/or unfair? Criteria FTC uses to determine practice is deceptive Likely to mislead, to a reasonable consumer, that is material. Criteria FTC uses to determine practice is unfair Substantial injury to consumers, not outweighed by countervailing benefits to the consumer or to competition, which consumers themselves could not have reasonably avoided. FTC Legal Standard for Requiring a Label 9

Harris Interactive Consumer Survey of Professional Care Label Options Harris Interactive commissioned to conduct online survey within the United States between September 18-20, 2013 among 2,000 adults (aged 18 and over). Survey questions developed by the UCLA Sustainable Technology & Policy Program and Harris. Harris adjusted questions and potential responses to increase clarify and reduce unintended bias. Respondents for survey selected from among those who have agreed to participate in Harris Interactive surveys. Figures for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, region and household income were weighted where necessary to bring them into line with their actual proportions in the population. FTC Legal Standard for Requiring a Label 10

Harris-UCLA Consumer Survey Q: When you see a garment with a care label that says Dry Clean what do you think it means? (n=1,191 users of prof. cleaning service) 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Dry cleaning is the only method for cleaning the garment. Dry cleaning is the recommended method for cleaning the garment. Dry cleaning is just one reliable method for cleaning the garment but other methods may also be appropriate. Don t know FTC Legal Standard for Requiring a Label 11

Harris-UCLA Consumer Survey Q: Have you ever heard of professional wet cleaning? (n=1,191 users of prof. cleaning service) 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Yes No Not sure FTC Legal Standard for Requiring a Label 12

Information on Professional Wetcleaning Harris-UCLA Consumer Survey For the next few questions please read and consider the following information. Professional wet cleaning is an alternative to dry cleaning and involves professional cleaners using water and special technology to clean garments typically labeled Dry Clean or Dry Clean Only. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has encouraged dry cleaners to add or switch to professional wet cleaning because the process is non-toxic, eliminating the use of dry clean chemicals used at most cleaners that the agency considers to be harmful to human health and the environment. University research has shown that cleaners making the switch are able to successfully wet clean the full range of Dry Clean and Dry Clean Only garments they previously dry cleaned and do so at a comparable cost. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which considers professional wet cleaning an environmentally friendly alternative to dry cleaning, has proposed adding a new Professional Wet Clean care label. FTC Legal Standard for Requiring a Label 13

Harris-UCLA Consumer Survey Q: Imagine you owned a garment labeled Dry Clean or Professional Wet Clean and the quality and cost of the two cleaning methods were the same. Which of these two professional cleaning methods would you prefer using for this garment? (n=1,191 users of prof. cleaning service) 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Dry cleaning Professional wet cleaning Not sure FTC Legal Standard for Requiring a Label 14

Harris-UCLA Consumer Survey Q: How significant, if at all, is avoiding the environmental and human health impacts of dry cleaning in your preference for professional wet cleaning? (n=659 users of prof. cleaning service who preferred professional wet cleaning) 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Very significant Fairly significant Somewhat significant Not at all significant FTC Legal Standard for Requiring a Label 15

Q: If the cleaner(s) you typically use were not able to professionally wet clean a garment you owned that was labeled Dry Clean or Professional Wet Clean, how willing, if at all, would you be to use a different cleaner which was able to professionally wet clean this garment (instead of dry cleaning it) if the price, quality, and location of this cleaner were comparable to the cleaner(s) you typically use? (n=659 users of prof. cleaning service who preferred professional wet cleaning) 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% Harris-UCLA Consumer Survey 0% Very willing Somewhat willing Somewhat unwilling Very unwilling FTC Legal Standard for Requiring a Label 16

Harris-UCLA Consumer Survey Q: Which of the following garment care labels would make you more likely to want to professionally wet clean a garment? (n=659 users of prof. cleaning service who preferred professional wet cleaning) FTC Legal Standard for Requiring a Label 17

Evidence that failure to list Professional Wet Clean on label is deceptive Likely to mislead, Dry Clean label extremely misleading and biased to dry cleaning. to a reasonable consumer, Survey of US population using professional cleaning services. that is material. Strong consumer preference for professional wet cleaning (55%) to dry cleaning (18%). Preference based on value of avoiding harm to the environmental human health. Preference strong enough that vast major willing to switch cleaners. Consumers with preference for professional wetcleaning less likely to act on their preference if words Professional Wetclean omitted from the care label. FTC Legal Standard for Requiring a Label 18

Evidence that failure to list Professional Wet Clean on label is unfair Substantial injury to consumers, Avoids harm to human health and the environment significant to virtually all consumers with preference for professional wet cleaning. not outweighed by countervailing benefits to the consumer or to competition, No trade-off benefits identified in using dry cleaning. No increased competition by not requiring Professional Wetclean label. which consumers themselves could not have reasonably avoided. Consumer have little knowledge of Professional Wetcleaning so likely to get essential information for care label. Consumers with preference less likely to use professional wetcleaning if words Professional Wetclean not on care label. FTC Legal Standard for Requiring a Label 19

3 rd Criterion for requiring a label: Is the response of requiring a label (a) appropriate and (b) cost-effective to address unfair or deceptive practice? 3 (a) Is requiring a Professional Wetclean label appropriate? Assessing Appropriateness of Requiring Label Specific Criteria for Requiring Label (1) Does it resolve failure to label? Yes (2) Does it resolve deceptive or unfair practice? Yes FTC Legal Standard for Requiring a Label 20

3 (b) Is the required use of a Professional Wetclean care label cost-effective? Costs Highest quality data to determine Professional Wetclean label experience, expertise, testing by trained professional wet cleaners. Expert judgment by professional wet cleaners (using experience and expertise) can be used for 99% of garments. Cost of expert judgment by professional wet cleaners extremely low: $50/item. o This cost likely comparable to current cost of expert judgment. Cost of testing at professional wet cleaners very low: $100/item. o This cost likely comparable to current cost of internal testing. Quick transfer of knowledge to apparel industry to allow cost to be internalized and assure current cost comparability. Cost saving likely: professional wet cleaning less expensive than dry cleaning, reduced enforcement cost, reduced pollution remediation cost. FTC Legal Standard for Requiring a Label 21

3 (b) Is the required use of a Professional Wetclean care label cost-effective? Effectiveness Requiring Professional Wetclean label eliminates deceptive practice of labeling garment Dry Clean which could also be professionally wetcleaned. Requiring Professional Wetclean label eliminates unfair practice of labeling garment Dry Clean which could also be professionally wetcleaned. Cost-Effectiveness Requiring Professional Wetclean label is extremely cost effective. FTC Legal Standard for Requiring a Label 22

Summery of Evidence in Professional Wetclean Case for Criteria Used by FTC to Require Use of a Care Label Decision-Making Criteria for Requiring Label Evidence Strength of Evidence Specific Criteria (1) Likelihood that failure to use label well be prevalent Very high High (2) Likelihood that failure to list method will be deceptive or unfair Very high High (3a) Requiring label is appropriate Yes High (3b) Requiring label cost-effective Yes High Overall Decision Extent evaluation of criteria supports required use of a label Very high High FTC Legal Standard for Requiring a Label 23

Key Questions Before conducting this research: Should the FTC allow or required the use of a Professional Wetclean care label? After conducting this research: What factors should the FTC consider in making an efficient and effective transition to a rule requiring the use of the Professional Wetclean care label? 24