CHICAGO CENTRAL AREA ACTION PLAN Chicago is Awesome! April 20, Central Area Action Plan

Similar documents
Central Area Action Plan. Adopted by the Chicago Plan Commission August 20, ChicaGo Central Area Action Plan

Central Area Action Plan. Adopted by the Chicago Plan Commission August 20, ChicaGo Central Area Action Plan

DRAFT ROOSEVELT ROAD. District Recommendations. Figure 5.23 The Roosevelt Road Corridor

DRAFT. Waterfronts and Open Spaces. 10 The Riverfront Open Space System

Chapter 4 : THEME 1. Development Framework DRAFT. Direct growth to create a dynamic Central Area made up of vibrant, mixed-use districts

Great Plans for a Great City

The University District envisions, in its neighborhood

CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation

Windsor Locks Transit-Oriented Development Planning Grant Request. Project Background

Harlem Avenue Corridor Plan: Corridor Planning Across Municipal Boundaries

Ashland BRT Environmental Assessment: logos of CTA, CDOT, Chicago Department of Housing and Economic Development

Chapter 4. Central Area Planning Subdistricts. Chicago Central Area ACTION Plan

The Village of Shirlington

LEED-ND 101: Practical Strategies for Achieving Sustainability Goals. Travis Parker Lakewood Planning Director

Promoting Economic Development Through Upfront SEPA Review: Lessons from South Downtown Tacoma

Albert Lea. Redevelopment Plan. 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN Tel: (763) Fax: (763) wsbeng.

Potential Green Infrastructure Strategies May 6, 2015 Workshop

Northwest Rail Corridor and US 36 BRT Development Oriented Transit Analysis 4.4 STATION AREA FINDINGS

38 Queen s University Campus Master Plan Part 1

Implementation Guide Comprehensive Plan City of Allen

Today Land & People. Northeast Nampa Gateway District. Employment. Land Use Characteristics. Demographics. Current Zoning

MONTGOMERY COUNTY METRO STATION AREA DESIGN CHARRETTE

Corridor Vision. 1Pursue Minnehaha-Hiawatha Community Works Project. Mission of Hennepin County Community Works Program

Planned Manufacturing District Review

Pedestrian and Bike Bridge LOGO

March 1, PWG Meeting #4

Table of Contents. Elm Avenue Improvement Plan City of Waco, Texas. Introduction 1. Existing Context 1 Figure 1 2.

Planning for Waterfront Communities

The transportation system in a community is an

REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTER

Preliminary Recommendations Tk Takoma/Langley Crossroads Sector Plan

1.0 Circulation Element

I-84 Hartford Project Open Planning Studio #12. April 25, 2017

Downtown Dubuque...it s a great time.

CHARLES PUTMAN CHARLES PUTMAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC

8implementation. strategies

South Davis County COMMUNITY SPOTLIGHT

Linking Land Use and Transportation

EXISTING PLANS Harriet Festing Center for Neighborhood Technology Midlothian Community Meeting March 12, 2015

NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN ELEMENT

Executive Summary. NY 7 / NY 2 Corridor

Issues Requiring Future Study

Study Area. Capitol Way. Greening America s Capitals 11/13/2014. A Greening America s Capitals Project

Making Transit Oriented Development Work For Boonton, NJ

C. Westerly Creek Village & The Montview Corridor

Urban Analysis. Downtown Zanesville like any city, has been physically modified through time as it

Riverwalk Dreams compiled by Thomas P. Healy November 16, 2017

WEST LOOP DESIGN GUIDELINES CHECKLIST

WELCOME and introduction

Kinzie Industrial Corridor

THE GREEN VISION WORKSHOP Friday, November 6, 2009

Dyersville Downtown Plan. Open House October 24, 2017

The Master Plan Framework

Tysons Circulator Study: Process and Preliminary Results Summary. March 2012

City of Ennis. Downtown Master Plan Catalyst Projects

40 Years of Smart Growth Arlington County s Experience with Transit Oriented Development in the Rosslyn-Ballston Metro Corridor

LAKESHORE EAST - IJKL

RESOLUTION NO. R Refining the route, profile and stations for the Downtown Redmond Link Extension

LPC Goals and Strategies. Transportation and Connectivity Employment Opportunities Food Access Waterfront Access Livable Communities

12/9/2013. HOLLYWOOD/PINES CORRIDOR PROJECT AMPO 2013 Annual Conference October 24, Our Perspective. Broward.

Atlanta BeltLine, Inc. Pathways to Urban Sustainability

Hopkins. Development Guidelines May Overview. Sponsored by: Blake Road Corridor Collaborative City of Hopkins

Plano Tomorrow Vision and Policies

Corridors. Re-vitalize our Corridors and Gateways

DISCUSSION TOPIC: ST JOHNS RIVER & ITS TRIBUTARIES (BPII) 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICES AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan

TOWN COUNCIL / PLANNING COMMISSION

East Central Area Plan

PLAN ELEMENTS WORKSHOP. April 5, 2016

Mississippi Skyway Preliminary Engineering Report

VILLAGE OF ROMEOVILLE

City of Long Beach. creating vibrant and exciting places

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

Chicago Neighborhoods 2015: Assets, Plans and Trends A project of The Chicago Community Trust

Workshop #3 June 13, 2016

Chapter 2 District Context

U T D N o r t h C a m p u s T O D and D o w n t o w n D e n t o n T O D

Somers Point Master Plan

Transportation. Strategies for Action

TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

[PLANNING RATIONALE] For Site Plan Control and Lifting of Holding Zone By-Law 101 Champagne Avenue. May 23, 2014

Carlsbad Village Redevelopment Concept Summary of Features

SARANAC LAKE VISION CONCEPTS

ORANGE COUNTY IMPLEMENTING THE FOUR C s

Shift Rapid Transit Public Participation Meeting May 3, 2017

KCATA Transit Oriented Development Initiatives

THEMES, VISION, + PRINCIPLES

Robbinsdale LRT Station. CDI Development Guidelines. August Overview

Nassau County Cultivating Opportunities for Sustainable Development Nassau County Infill Redevelopment Feasibility Study

Wasatch CHOICE for 2040

TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS

ROBBINSDALE LRT STATION CDI DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES

About Momentum Midland

Welcome! Please sign-in and participate in the activities in the registration area before finding your seat. Thank you!

Economic Redevelopment of Underutilized Parcels. May 16, 2012 Northland Arboretum Brainerd, Minnesota

ARISE: The Rock Renaissance Area Redevelopment & Implementation Strategy

Sustainable Development Call for Projects

Meeting Agenda. 1. Introductions (5 min)

40 Years of Smart Growth Arlington County s Experience with Transit Oriented Development in the Rosslyn-Ballston Metro Corridor

WALTER RAND TRANSPORTATION CENTER

Transcription:

CHICAGO CENTRAL AREA ACTION PLAN Chicago is Awesome! April 20, 2010

Implementing Central Area Plan 2003 Central Area Plan Defined a vision for the next generation of the Central Area Identified key projects Guided zoning reform 2008 Updates development trends Refines goals and projects Prices and prioritizes projects Identifies funding needs and phasing

Committee & Task Force Structure Steering Committee Patricia Scudiero John Buck Urban Design, Waterfront & Open Space John Syvertsen Transportation Ralph Weber Luann Hamilton Economic Development & Land Use Mary Ludgin

Central Area Growth & Development Trends

Population & Demographic Trends The Central Area s population was estimated to be 165,500 at the end of 2007, an increase of nearly 54,000 since the 2000 Census. By 2020, the population of the Central Area is forecast to be between 215,000 and 230,000. By 2020, growth of 4,500 to 6,000 jobs per year is estimated to push Central Area employment between 630,000 and 650,000.

Development Trends 2000-2007 Base Case Scenario Opportunity Scenario Total Addition to Supply Annual Average Office (SF) 1,600,00 2,200,000 15,135,000 1,892,000 Retail (SF) 250,000 350,000 3,160,000 395,000 Residential (Units) 1,800 2,200 33,464 4,183 Student Housing (Beds) 150 180 4,206 526 Hotel (Rooms) 600 700 4,323 540

Office Development Map shows buildings completed since 2001 and under construction. Office market began a period of recovery in 2006 with positive absorption, dropping vacancy rates, and stable or rising rents. Several large office buildings are under construction, but few new projects are likely to start until the economy recovers. Average annual demand is forecast to be 1.2 to 1.5 million square feet. The supply is not constrained since identified prime office development sites and available space in existing buildings could accommodate approximately 25 million square feet.

Residential Development Map shows residential projects completed since 2001 and under construction. Residential development outpaced the forecast of the 2003 Central Area Plan An annual average of 4,200 new housing units has been added since 2000. Current conditions suggest that an annual average of 2,600 to 3,300 new housing units will be added each year through 2020.

Map of Existing and Proposed Schools within and adjacent to the Central Area

Hotel Development Map shows new and underconstruction hotels Hotel development fell slightly short of the base case projections made in 2000 due primarily to 9/11. Millennium Park boosted visitation and spurred hotel development, particularly in the Central Loop. Current economic conditions are likely to stall some of many proposed hotel projects. An annual average of 500 to 700 new hotel rooms is now forecast.

Retail Development Map shows retail projects completed since 2001 or under construction. Nearly 400,000 square feet were added annually from 2000 to 2007 in major projects such as NorthBridge and retail components of smaller mixed-use buildings. The emerging retail corridor along Roosevelt Road accounts for much of the new retail. 108 North State, New City Y site, and Sullivan Center are among the retail projects underway. The number of new grocery stores reflects demand from the growing residential base. Future retail development is expected to range from 250,000 to 350,000 square feet per year.

Institutional Development Map shows new or under construction cultural and educational facilities, churches, government buildings, visitor attractions, and medical facilities. Schools of higher education played an important part in South Loop and Central Loop development. New culture venues were added and existing facilities expanded. State-of-the-art medical facilities continue to strengthen Streeterville.

Maintain the Central Area as the Center of Regional Growth Market Sector Growth Benchmarks, 2008-2020 Projected Average Annual Growth Population Employment Office (SF) Retail (SF) Cultural (SF) Residential (Units) Student Housing (Beds) Hotel (Rooms) Base 4,200 4,500 1,200,000 250,000 85,000 2,600 150 500 Opportunity 5,300 6,000 1,500,000 350,000 100,000 3,300 200 700

Economic Development and Land Use Goals Maintain Chicago s position as the economic engine of the region Enhance urban vibrancy and utilize the existing infrastructure by supporting dense residential development Reduce Chicago s carbon footprint by implementing cutting-edge environmental practices and green building techniques Enhance parks, corridors and waterfronts for residents, workers, students and visitors Better connect to the world through O Hare and Midway airports and the regional rail network Strengthen Chicago's ties to the North American economy through efficient freight movement. Support the growth envisioned by the plan by investing in transit. Frame a city/state/federal capital investment plan supplemented by private participation. Coordinate public planning by incorporating the Central Area Action Plan into the regional transportation plan, Chicago 2016 Olympic plans, and state and federal capital programs

Transportation Key Goals and Projects

Transportation Goals Improve transit in Central Area Increase regional transit capacity Improve the pedestrian environment Manage traffic circulation Encourage alternative modes Improve national and international connections

Proposed Transit Improvements within the Central Area

CTA Signal & Capacity Upgrades City Role: Supporting Timeframe: 2008-2012 Cost Estimate: $1.5B system wide Potential Funding Sources: Federal capital transit funds, local/state bonds CRITERIA RATING Transportation Expands capacity on high ridership lines Helps solve major reliability & slow-zone problems Economic Development & Land Use Maintains viable service connecting Central Loop to airports and neighborhoods Environment & Open Space Reinvests in existing highly used transit assets

CTA Station Modernization City Role: Project Lead Timeframe: 2008-2020 Cost Estimate: $70M - $90M per station for 9 Central Area stations Potential Funding Sources: Local/state bonds, TIF, CMAQ CRITERIA RATING Transportation Need Improves competitiveness & accessibility of existing transit system Does not expand transit coverage Economic Development & Land Use Reinvests in the core Central Area business districts Environment & Open Space Avoids new construction by restoring and making more efficient use of existing infrastructure Olympic Impact = Yes Graphic courtesy of www.createprogram.org

CTA Infill Stations City Role: Partner with CTA Timeframe: Complete 4 stations by 2020 Cost Estimate: $40M $60M per station for 4 new stations Potential Funding Sources: Local/state bonds, federal capital funds, TIF, CMAQ CRITERIA RATING Transportation Improves overall connectivity and accessibility of rail system Economic Development & Land Use Expands access to and from Near South, West and North Sides all high-growth residential districts with potential for continued growth Environment & Open Space Helps maximize usage of existing infrastructure

Transit Passenger Info Systems City Role: Partner with RTA and CTA Timeframe: Complete upgrades to all stations by 2016 Cost Estimate: $20M Potential Funding Sources: TIF, CMAQ Graphic from http://www.rtams.org CRITERIA RATING Transportation Makes using system in Central Area easier, especially for new/occasional customers Economic Development & Land Use No effect--does not change access to or travel time for key districts Environment & Open Space Helps maximize usage of existing system

Airport Express Service City Role: Partner with CTA Timeframe: 2008-2012 Cost Estimate: $1.5B Potential Funding Sources: State/federal funds (construction), private funds (operations) CRITERIA RATING Transportation Improves travel times to both airports from Central Area terminal May be combined with other signal/track improvements on O Hare branch Economic Development & Land Use Improves access for travelers to Central Loop employment center Enhances Chicago s attractiveness as corporate headquarters city Environment & Open Space Reduces reliance on auto/taxis for trips to airport

Clinton Street Subway City Role: Partner with RTA, CTA Timeframe: 2012-2020 Cost Estimate: $3B Potential Funding Sources: FTA New Starts, TIF, CMAQ CRITERIA RATING Transportation Improves access to growing River North subdistrict Removes congestion from State Street (Red Line) Subway Economic Development & Land Use Serves main corridor of high-density office growth in West Loop Environment & Open Space Helps maximize usage of existing system

Central Area Transitways Carroll Ave Lakefront East-West (Monroe Street) Clinton Street

Carroll Ave Transitway City Role: Lead Timeframe: 2008 2012 Cost Estimate: $260M Potential Funding Sources: FTA New Starts/Small Starts, State/local bonds, Transportation Improvement District, public/private partnership CRITERIA RATING Transportation Connects underserved Streeterville, improving travel to hospitals/navy Pier Provides east-west connectivity in area without major direct roadway route Economic Development & Land Use Supports residential and employment growth in Streeterville, River North, and West Loop Environment & Open Space Reduces reliance on autos for trips to Streeterville district Uses existing unused right-of-way

East-West Transitway (Monroe) East-West Transitway City Role: Lead Timeframe: 2012-2016 Cost Estimate: $200M Potential Funding Sources: FTA New Starts/Small Starts, State/local bonds, Transportation Improvement District, public/private partnership CRITERIA RATING Transportation Addresses long-studied need for eastwest transit connectivity in Central Loop Connects West Loop and East Loop commuter stations Economic Development & Land Use Serves core of Central Area employment districts Environment & Open Space Improves access to Lakefront Project construction may cause major short-term disruptions

Lakefront Transitway Lakefront Transitway City Role: Lead Timeframe: 2012-2016 Cost Estimate: $150M Potential Funding Sources: FTA New Starts/Small Starts, state/local bonds, Transportation Improvement District, public/private partnership CRITERIA RATING Transportation Provides rapid transit service along high-growth eastern portion of Central Area Connects Near South & Streeterville Economic Development & Land Use Connects key cultural/tourism assets along lakefront Supports Olympics bid Environment & Open Space Provides direct transit access from Near South to Lakefront parks Uses existing improved right-of-way

West Loop Transportation Center West Loop Transportation Center City Role: Lead Timeframe: 2012-2016 Cost Estimate: $2B Potential Funding Sources: FTA New Starts, State bonds, TIF CRITERIA RATING Transportation Connects major West Loop hubs with local, regional, and national networks Will serve future transitway and Clinton subway projects Economic Development & Land Use Invests in West Loop, the area driving Central Area employment growth Environment & Open Space Supports all alternatives to auto use

INSERT AMTRAK GRAPHIC?? INSERT REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL GRAPHIC?? New Intermodal Facility Streetway & Pedestrian Access Improvements Passenger Area Improvement s Platform & Capacity Enhancement s = existing access point Union Station Upgrades City Role: Partner with Amtrak, Metra, RTA Timeframe: 2008-2012 Cost Estimate: $80M - $100M Potential Funding Sources: State/local bonds, TIF, CMAQ, Amtrak CRITERIA RATING Transportation Improves efficiency of busiest transfer site in the region Improves comfort, accessibility, & potential capacity of existing service Economic Development & Land Use Enhances West Loop as hub of new office growth Environment & Open Space Helps maximize usage of landmark Central station Area Action Plan

Wacker Drive Reconstruction City Role: Lead Timeframe: E/W portion completed N/S leg requires funding (2008-2012) Cost Estimate: $350M for N/S leg Potential Funding Sources: State/local bonds, TIF CRITERIA RATING Transportation Reinvests in major streetway abutting river s South Branch Lower level provides delivery and parking garage access Economic Development & Land Use Improves auto & pedestrian environment in most actively developed office corridor in Central Area Environment & Open Space Adds streetscaping elements and green infrastructure

Smoothed Curve Improved Auto & Ped Access Graphic courtesy of www.createprogram.org More Lakefront Open Space North LSD Improvements City Role: Partner with IDOT Timeframe: 2012-2016 Cost Estimate: $200M Potential Funding Sources: Local/state bonds, CMAQ, Federal earmarks CRITERIA RATING Transportation Improves unsafe curve at Oak St. and intersection at Chicago Ave. Provides more space for bicycle and pedestrian paths along Lakefront Economic Development & Land Use Improves access to growing employment and residential concentrations in Streeterville Environmental & Open Space Dramatically increases open space amenities and access to Lakefront

Regional Transit Projects- Metra and CTA

Urban Design, Waterfront & Open Space Key Goals and Projects

Urban Design, Waterfront & Open Space Goals Strengthen Chicago as an environmentally sustainable city Strengthen the Lakefront as Chicago's great public space Develop the Chicago Riverfront as a continuous system of premier public places Create a new generation of downtown parks Complete the Central Area s framework of richly landscaped streets and boulevards

Areas of Special Interest

Urban Form

Parks and Streetscapes

Urban Design Projects Streetscape Improvements Building Lighting Enhancement Kennedy Corridor Improvements and Cap

Streetscape Improvements City Role: Lead by CDOT Timeframe: 2008-2016 Cost Estimate: Varies Project Description: Expand streetscape upgrades that have benefited prominent north/south streets within the Central Area. To complement these, improvements are proposed for east/west streets to enhance motorist and pedestrian mobility and to anchor investment in surrounding areas. Improvements should incorporate environmentally friendly design elements and materials from the City s Green Alleys and Streets initiative and from the Green Urban Design Task Force.

Lighting Enhancements City Role: Involvement of CDOT. DLUP, DCD, DOE Timeframe: 2008-2012 Cost Estimate: $400,000 Project Description: Enhance structure lighting. A program of improvements along Michigan Avenue has been developed by Schuler Shook. Michigan should serve as the pilot for similar programs on LaSalle and Randolph. A grant or loan program should be established to facilitate private sector implementation. Lighting improvements guidelines should include recommendations from the Lights Out Chicago program, which protects migratory birds, saves energy, and decreases maintenance costs.

Kennedy Corridor Enhancements & Cap City Role: Lead by CDOT Timeframe: Improvements - 2008-2012 Kennedy Cap - 2016-2020 Cost Estimate: Improvements - $10 million Kennedy Cap - $500 million Project Description: Build a cap atop the Kennedy to improve connections between the Central Loop and the West Loop. Short-term: Traffic calming, landscaping, pedestrian mobility enhancements. Long-term: Create parkland over the Kennedy between Monroe and Washington. New urban greenway would improve air quality and reduce noise pollution.

Waterfront Projects Lakefront Trail expansion Gateway Harbor Chicago Riverfront System

Lakefront Trail Expansion City Role: Involves CDOT, DZLUP, DCD, CPD Timeframe: 2012-2016 Cost Estimate: $177 million Project Description: Expand the Lakefront Trail lakeward between North Ave. and Navy Pier by up to 200 feet. Introduce landscaping to create parkland and expanded pedestrian and bicycle paths. This project should be undertaken in conjunction with North Lake Shore Drive improvements at the Oak St. curve and at Chicago Ave.

Gateway Harbor City Role: Lead by CPD Timeframe: 2008-2012 Cost Estimate: $30 million Project Description: Build new boat marina and amenities connecting Dime Pier to the Navy Pier Headlands. Also explore feasibility of establishing direct boat access to Navy Pier at river level by relocating a wall segment northwest of the Chicago Locks.

Main Branch Riverfront Lake Shore Drive to Franklin City Role: Involves MWRD, CDOT, DZLUP, DCD Timeframe: Phase 1-2008-2011 Phase 2-2012-2016 Cost Estimate: $92 million Project Description: Create a continuous multi-level Riverwalk along the north side of the Chicago River with underbridge connections at Michigan Ave. and Lake Shore Drive to DuSable Park. Establish clearly identified onstreet connections west of Michigan Ave and east of Wells Street ($12 million). Develop a dock level Riverwalk along the south side of the Chicago River with under bridge and vertical connections for continuous water access. ($80 million).

North Branch Riverfront Lake to Halsted City Role: Involves CDWM, CDOT, DZLUP, DCD Timeframe: 2012-2016 Cost Estimate: $75 million Project Description: Develop the North Branch Riverfront with: ADA-accessible boatyard Off-river connection from Kinzie Park Under-bridge connection to Wolf Point A street level park south of Riverbend for future development Create a river level trail on the east side of the river to connect lower level walks Develop Riverwalk north of River Village to the North Ave. Turning Basin Improve river access at the east bank between North and Division Landscape west bank from Grand Ave. to North Ave

South Branch Riverfront Lake to Harrison City Role: Involves CDWM, CDOT, DZLUP, DCD Timeframe: 2012-2016 Cost Estimate: $15 million Project Description: Develop a multi-component Riverwalk on the South Branch in the West Loop and Central Loop. Includes a contiguous street level Riverwalk with improved connections and access to large plazas, and a dock level Riverwalk on the east bank. Will also include adjacent green space and vertical connection near Van Buren St.

South Branch Riverfront Harrison to Stewart City Role: Involves CDWM, CDOT, DZLUP, DCD Timeframe: 2016-2020 Cost Estimate: $75 million Project Description: Develop a multicomponent Riverwalk on the South Branch in South West Loop, River South, and Chinatown. Connection to River City Vertical connection at Harrison St. New pedestrian and vehicular crossings Underbridge connections at Roosevelt and 18th St. Public park in future Franklin Point development On-street connections near Ping Tom Park to future Riverwalk development at East Canal Origins Park Landscaping on west riverbank

Open Space Projects Queen s Landing Northerly Island Grant Park Railscape DuSable Park Ping Tom Park Phase 2

Queen s Landing City Role: CDOT Lead Timeframe: 2008-2012 Cost Estimate: $500,000 Project Description: Improve pedestrian access between Buckingham Fountain in Grant Park and the cross-lake Shore Drive lakefront. This a key component of the Grant Park Framework Plan and includes improved crosswalks and signage. Queen s Landing is the spot at which Queen Elizabeth II came ashore during her 1959 visit.

Northerly Island City Role: CPD lead Timeframe: 2008-2012 Cost Estimate: $75 million Project Description: Create a state-ofthe-art park with sustainable design principles to serve as an outdoor conservation museum.

Grant Park Railscape City Role: Involves RTA, Metra, DZLUP, DCD, CPD Timeframe: 2012-2016 Cost Estimate: $32.6 million Project Description: Screen the railroad tracks throughout Grant Park and south to Museum Place. The appearance of the existing open railroad trench could be improved by a green screen over the tracks. Explore potential to reduce the former rail service yard area generally known as the pennant lot (as depicted in red) to add park land.

DuSable Park City Role: Involves CPD, CDOT, DZLUP, DCD Timeframe: 2008-2012 Cost Estimate: $17 million Project Description: Develop a public park at the inlet of the Chicago River at Lake Michigan to commemorate Chicago s founding pioneer. This park will be build through a publicprivate partnership with the developer of The Spire.

Ping Tom Park Phase II City Role: Involves CPD, DZLUP, CDOT, Canadian National Railroad Timeframe: Various phases 2008-2016 Cost Estimate: $38 million Project Description: Develop Phase 2 of Ping Tom Park. In 2002, the Chicago Park District acquired 5 acres to expand the park to the northeast. A former industrial site, the land will be cleaned up and redeveloped into a spacious community park with ball and soccer fields, a field house, and a swimming pool.

Cost & Phasing

Grand Total Transportation = Urban Design = Grand Total = $14.24 Billion $1.31 Billion $15.55 Billion

Phased Investment Cost (in 2007 $) 2008-2012 Transportation = $5,926,000,000 Urban Design = $ 281,100,000 Total = $6,207,100,000 2012-2016 Transportation = $4,765,000,000 Urban Design = $ 443,000,000 Total = $5,208,000,000 2016-2020 Transportation = $3,550,000,000 Urban Design = $ 585,000,000 Total = $4,135,000,000

Central Area Transit Regional Transit Capacity Pedestrian Environment Traffic Circulation Alternative Modes National/International Connections 2008-2012 Transportation CTA Station Modernization (4 Stations) Carroll Avenue Transitway Clinton Street Transitway CTA Infill Station (Morgan - Green/Pink) Transit/Passenger Information Systems CTA Signal & Capacity Upgrade CREATE Program (initial) Metra UP-W Upgrades Metra UP-NW Extension & Upgrades Union Station Access/Intermodal Upgrade Wacker Drive Reconstruction (Phase II) Wells-Wentworth Connector (Phase I) West Loop Bicycle Station Airport Rail Express Service Union Station Capacity/Facility Upgrade Subtotal Cost (in 2007 $) $360,000,000 $260,000,000 $60,000,000 $60,000,000 $10,000,000 $1,500,000,000 $750,000,000 $536,000,000 $419,000,000 $30,000,000 $350,000,000 $30,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000,000 $60,000,000 $5,926,000,000

2008-2012 Urban Design Cost (in 2007 $) Urban Design Waterfront Open Space Congress Parkway Grand & Illinois Kennedy Corridor Enhancements East Randolph Lighting Enhancements (Michigan, Congress & Wacker) Main Branch Riverfront (Phase I) Gateway Harbor Chicago River Management Entity Northerly Island Park Improvements Grant Park Improvements North Ping Tom Phase II (Site Dev./Railway Underpass) DuSable Park Pedestrian Connection at Queen s Landing Subtotal $19,000,000 $19,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,750,000 $600,000 $46,000,000 $30,000,000 $250,000 $75,000,000 $35,000,000 $20,000,000 $17,000,000 $500,000 $281,100,000

2012-2016 Transportation Cost (in 2007 $) Central Area Transit Regional Transit Capacity Traffic Circulation West Loop Transportation Center Clinton Subway (Phase I) CTA Station Modernization (3 Stations) East-West Transitway Lakefront Transitway CTA Infill Station (Cermak - Green) CTA Infill Station (Division - Brown/Purple) Transit/Passenger Information Systems CREATE Program (Completion) North Lake Shore Drive Improvements South Branch Bridge at Taylor Street Wells-Wentworth Connector (Phase II) Subtotal $2,000,000,000 $1,000,000,000 $270,000,000 $200,000,000 $150,000,000 $60,000,000 $60,000,000 $10,000,000 $750,000,000 $200,000,000 $50,000,000 $15,000,000 $4,765,000,000

2012-2016 Urban Design Cost (in 2007 $) Urban Design Waterfront Open Space West Loop/Union Station Area Streetscape Division Streetscape Lighting Enhancements (LaSalle & Randolph) Lakefront Trail Expansion North Branch Riverfront (River North) Main Branch Riverfront (Phase II) South Branch Riverfront (Downtown) Lakefront Trail Bridge Ping Tom Phase II (Multi-Purpose Center/Boathouse) Grant Park South Railscape Grant Park Central Railscape Central Station Area Railscape Subtotal $33,000,000 $21,000,000 $400,000 $177,000,000 $75,000,000 $46,000,000 $15,000,000 $25,000,000 $18,000,000 $17,200,000 $7,900,000 $7,500,000 $443,000,000

2016-2020 Transportation Cost (in 2007 $) Central Area Transit Pedestrian Environment Traffic Circulation Clinton Subway (Phase II) CTA Station Modernization (2 Stations) CTA Infill Station (Clark/18th - Orange) Pedestrian Bridges over River (Streeterville, W. Loop) South Branch Bridge at 16th or Polk Street Subtotal $2,000,000,000 $180,000,000 $60,000,000 $60,000,000 $50,000,000 $2,350,000,000

2016-2020 Urban Design Urban Design Waterfront Open Space Kennedy Cap South Branch Riverfront (River South) Fort Dearborn Park Subtotal Cost (in 2007 $) $500,000,000 $75,000,000 $10,000,000 $585,000,000

Regional Supporting Transit Phase Project Projects (2008 2020) Cost (in 2007 $) 2012-2016 2016-2020 CTA Orange Line Extension CTA Red Line Extension CTA Yellow Line Extension Metra South East Line Service Development CTA Circle Line Construction Metra Star Line Construction Subtotal $300,000,000 $1,000,000,000 $300,000,000 $550,000,000 $3,000,000,000 $1,100,000,000 $6,250,000,000

2007 Capital Budget Programs Selected Programs Total capital budget was $2.0 billion in 2007 Selected programs compose ¼ of total, or $423 million Transportation $180,788,815 $181 M Economic Development $113,984,623 $114 M CitySpace $14,892,555 $15 M Neighborhood Infrastructure $113,437,563 $113 M Source: City of Chicago

2007 Capital Budget Funding Sources Funding Sources for CitySpace, Economic Development, Neighborhood Infrastructure and Transportation Programs State Funds $78,478,000 19% G.O. Bonds $184,684,961 43% TIF $34,415,329 8% Source: City of Chicago Other Federal Funds $112 732 000

Transit Capital Funding Sources United States Top 50 Transit Agencies State government 12% Other sources <1% Federal government 35% Local sources 53% Source: RTA, Moving Beyond Congestion

Funding Strategy Recommendations Target TIF funds for major capital projects Bond against future TIF revenues when possible Consider special area funding mechanisms

Potential Funding Sources Federal Transportation Funds Federal Economic Stimulus Funds State Capital Program Private Investment CREATE, Corporate Donations Public-Private Partnerships General Obligation Bonding

Chicago is Awesome! Thank You! cbhaller@cityofchicago.org