Errol Heights Park and Community Garden Frequently Asked Questions March 22, 2018

Similar documents
Charles P. Johnson and Associates. Annapolis Landscape Architects

1. Parks & Recreation Neighborhood Parks Community Parks Special Use Sites 2. Open Space 3. Trails

Mendota Heights 2040 Comprehensive Plan Draft Vers

Long Branch-Wayne Local Park Renovation Project

Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan

WILLIAM PAYNE SPORTS PARK MASTER PLAN BOARD OF DIRECTORS PRESENTATION

Description of Preferred Alternative

South East Sports Complex Phase I

Chapter 5: Natural Resources and Environment

PARTF Scoring System for Grants

Throughout. square. (Crystal City Vision Plan 2050)

SAN FRANCISCO RECREATION + PARKS DEPARTMENT MARGARET HAYWARD PLAYGROUND COMMUNITY WORKSHOP #1 WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 27, 2016

Draft Master Plan for Franklin Park

OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS - OXBOW PARK ENTRANCE AND PUT-IN

BROOKHILL NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL ZONING MAP AMENDMENT PREFACE TO APPLICATION

Neighborhood Districts

Ten Mile Creek Planning Area

The University District envisions, in its neighborhood

2035 General Plan Update and Belmont Village Specific Plan. Joint Study Session with the City Council and Planning Commission April 12, 2016

CITY OF GAINESVILLE PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT VISION 2020

Montana Rail Link Park

Secrest Short Cut and Monroe Expressway Small Area Plan AUGUST 29, 2018

Yadkin River Greenway Feasibility Study Fact Sheet Village of Clemmons, Town of Lewisville, Town of Bermuda Run

The Illinois Department of Transportation and Lake County Division of Transportation. Route 173, including the Millburn Bypass

Port Lavaca Future Land Use

ARROYO PROJECTS ADOPTED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET

Candlestick Point SRA Yosemite Slough Restoration Project. Presented by

Potential Green Infrastructure Strategies May 6, 2015 Workshop

Envision Sustainable Infrastructure

TOWN BRANCH COMMONS & VINE STREET MOBILITY IMPROVEMENTS

One said, without a clear understanding of what will be annexed, this is an exercise in futility.

Courthouse Square Planning & Urban Design Study Working Group Meeting #11 September 2, 2014

February 27, 2018 City Council Presentation The Crown Jewel Park in the City of Fairfax

CITY OF COLWICH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE LAND USE 1

SITE FEASIBILITY TEST FIT LAYOUT NORTHERN AREA INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL DECEMBER 2016

BENJAMIN BANNEKER PARK FRAMEWORK PLAN (PLAN ADOPTION)

SECTION II SECTION II STATEMENT OF GOALS, OBJECTIVES, PRINCIPLES, ASSUMPTIONS, POLICIES AND STANDARDS

Illustration of Eastlake Farmer s Cooperative Grain Elevator. Chapter 5: implementation 5-1

Welcome! Far Northeast Area Plan Meeting #3 Council District 11 Town Hall Meeting Resource Fair. Jan. 30, 2018

BUSINESS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HALF MOON BAY AGENDA REPORT

3.1 community vision. 3.3 required plan elements

CHAPPLES PARK MASTER PLAN

Policy & Procedure Effective Date: Parks Department Page of

KASPER. City of Georgetown, Texas PUD Planned Unit Development. December 30, 2015 Revised January 27, 2016

Butchers Hill. Greening Feasibility FINAL REPORT MAY 2009 N PORT ST N WOLFE ST S MADEIRA ST. Submitted To: Submitted By:

Transportation. Strategies for Action

BISCUIT RUN PARK MASTER PLAN

OPEN SPACE TYPES. SIZE 8 acres. SIZE 20 acres. SIZE 1 acre

Northeast Quadrant Plan

Johnson Street Bridge Public Realm Update

Developer s Program. The Station at East 54

Minto-Brown Island. November 18, City of Salem, Parks & Transportation Services

Open House RIVER DES PERES GREENWAY: LANSDOWNE SHREWSBURY METROLINK TO FRANCIS R. SLAY PARK

ARTICLE IV: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 404 MASTER PLANNING

SF REC & PARK STANYAN STREET IMPROVEMENT. Supervisor London Breed District 5. Project Manager Dan Mauer Recreation and Parks Department

WARM SPRINGS PARK MASTER PLAN

Seattle s Natural Drainage Systems and Complete Streets

New Partners for Smart Growth Conference February 5, 2010

Marshview Park. Concept Briefing and Feedback Session. Aquarium/Owls Creek Plan Steering Committee March 20, 2012

Proposed Walkability Ordinance for City of Knoxville (6/16/17)

CHAPTER 8 ISSUES, CONCERNS, CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES

City Council March 27, Parks, Recreation, and Trails Master Plan

Citizen Information Meeting

City of Bonney Lake Allan Yorke Park. MASTER PLAN SUMMARY REPORT June 30, 2016

Green Infrastructure The Indianapolis Greenways Connection

Welcome. Comprehensive Plan & Transportation Plan Open House November 7, 2012

Today Land & People. Northeast Nampa Gateway District. Employment. Land Use Characteristics. Demographics. Current Zoning

DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW. Game Plan for a Healthy City

Las Colonias Park Master Plan

Subregion 4 Central Avenue-Metro Blue Line Corridor Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Implementation Project. Community Meeting April 27, 2011

LINCOLN COUNTY COMMONS - REVISED MASTER PLAN. Lincoln County Public Meetings June 26-27, 2018, 6pm

100 Dix Drive Conceptual Master Plan. Wyatt Thompson, PLA, ASLA, Assistant Director Lindsay Stucki, Intern Park Planner

DATE: October 25, Park, Recreation and Open Space Advisory Committee (PROSAC) Jordan Harrison, Planner III, RPD Planning Division

TOD 101 CREATING LIVABLE COMMUNITIES WITH TRANSIT

Issues Requiring Future Study

2. Analysis. DRAFT Gerald Richards & Pleasantview Park Master Plan

Age Friendly Design ( 2:15 Breakout Session )

PLAN ELEMENTS WORKSHOP. April 5, 2016

W&OD PARK MASTER PLAN. The City s Greenest Street. DRAFT W&OD Trail Master Plan v4.docx Page 1

FY Capital Improvement Program Arroyo Projects

Master Site Development Plan (MSDP) Rocky View County Campus at Balzac East

Tacoma Mall Neighborhood Subarea Plan & EIS. Planning Commission January 18, 2017

Additional information about land use types is given in Chapter 5. Design guidelines for Centers and Neighborhoods are given in Chapter 7.

APPENDIX D: PARKS AND RECREATION ACTION PLAN

Southeast Quadrant Plan

5. Father Hennepin Blufs Park and Hennepin Island Father Hennepin Bluffs Park Supporting Initiatives (see Figure 36): 7-22

THE GAS PLANT DISTRICT MASTER PLAN SCENARIO 2. COMMUNITY MEETING August 6, 2018

Envision Sustainable Infrastructure

New Park / Entry Court & Plaza Concept Design

Draft Environmental Assessment

Comprehensive Park System Master Plan

PARK DATA THEMES SUMMARY:

tinyan lee the hastings experience masterplan : hastings corridor individual design sustainable urbanism : the hastings corridor

EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

The bottom urban structure and guidelines City Council Briefing

Subarea 4 Indian Creek. Vision The combination of park networks and transportation amenities make Subarea 4 the greenest hub in the Corridor.

ADOPTED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET ARROYO PROJECTS

Envision Concord Public Event Part 3. October 21, :30 AM 12:00 PM Concord-Carlisle High School Cafeteria

GOALS, OBJECTIVES, POLICIES & PROGRAMS

Silver Line CPAM UPDATE. Transportation and Land Use Committee October 14, 2016

Transcription:

Errol Heights Park and Community Garden Frequently Asked Questions March 22, 2018 Question 1: What improvements are planned for Errol Heights Park? How will the community be engaged in the process to shape improvements? Located in SE Portland, this 16-acre park includes a natural area, undeveloped park space, and a community garden. This project will engage the community to update the 2005 Master Plan, and set community-supported priorities for the construction of park improvements. 1,477 households are within a half-mile walking distance of Errol Heights Park, located at SE 52 nd and SE Tenino Court, in the Brentwood-Darlington neighborhood. The current allocation of $5.3 million will allow Portland Parks & Recreation to realize the first phase of desired improvements to the park and natural area. Funding to design and build the next step in development comes from System Development Charges for parks, trails and natural areas. Portland Parks & Recreation is working closely with the Portland Bureau of Transportation to coordinate park and street improvement projects in the Errol Heights neighborhood. Improvements to Errol Heights Park may include: Additional and improved paths Enhancements to the natural area portion of the park A grass lawn and new plantings A community garden Street improvements Amenities for play and/or sports A picnic and/or gathering area A Portland Loo or other restroom facility Help shape your future park! A diverse group of community advisors will be recruited in April to help shape the future of the park. Park enthusiasts, gardeners, neighbors, and natural area explorers of all ages, abilities and backgrounds are encouraged to apply. A project schedule will be available in late March. Everyone is welcome to participate! Visit us online to learn more: Portland Parks & Recreation, Errol Heights Park Project www.portlandoregon.gov/parks/errolheights Portland Bureau of Transportation, Errol Heights Street Improvement Project www.portlandoregon.gov/transportation/75400 1

Question 2: Will the new park have a community garden? Yes! Portland Parks & Recreation is aware of the popularity and success of this garden, and will include it in the park design. A new location within the park will be determined as part of the community process to guide park improvements. The new Errol Heights Community Garden will be constructed in Fall 2018 to ensure a smooth transition. Question 3: Does SE Tenino Court need to connect to SE Tenino Drive? Isn t it better to remove this section of SE Tenino Court, and use the land for park space rather than a street? As part of the park design process, the City of Portland has looked closely at the section of Tenino Court that passes through the park property. Tenino Court will provide needed parking for park visitors. Removing a section of the street with connection to Tenino Drive has significant impacts on neighborhood streets and the park. The costs and impacts of removing the connecting section of Tenino Court far outweigh the benefits. The City of Portland has determined that SE Tenino Court must remain a through street with connection to SE Tenino Drive. The following three major factors were considered: 1. Errol Heights Street Improvement Project The Errol Heights Street Improvement Project proposes to implement new City street designs for the neighborhood s unpaved roads. The project will build a new network of narrow, curbless roads, and stormwater facilities to improve access to the neighborhood, address drainage issues, and improve water quality in Johnson Creek. The project, using the Shared Street Design, will improve about 1.2 miles of unpaved streets in the neighborhood where steep slopes, seeps, springs, and soils create local drainage issues and erode gravel roads. Poor road conditions impact the neighborhood s livability and make it challenging for residents to walk, bike, drive or be served by emergency vehicles. The future park improvements are expected to increase traffic through the neighborhood, particularly during soccer practices and games on the planned sports field. The removal of a section of Tenino Court at the junction with Tenino Drive will shift the traffic in the neighborhood, and increase traffic volumes on adjacent streets in Errol Heights. The higher traffic volumes on neighborhood streets could exceed the allowable limits for the Shared Street Design (500 vehicles per day), and these streets would then be required to be fully improved with curbs and sidewalks. The Shared Street Design has a lower overall cost and is more affordable for property owners who want their neighborhood streets improved. Changing the street design would increase the LID fees for property owners in the Errol Heights neighborhood and risk 4 years of work on the street improvement project. 2

Question 3: Continued 2. Portland City Code To meet connectivity standards, Portland Bureau of Transportation requires Tenino Court remains a through street, as it is today. The distance from SE 52nd to 49th Ave to get to Tenino Court is approximately 1000 feet. Shifting the location of the Tenino Court connection to Tenino Drive still meets the city code, as discussed below. Title 33 (33.654.110) Connectivity and Location of Rights-of-Way Through streets and pedestrian connections in OS, R, C, and E Zones. In OS, R, C, and E zones, through streets and pedestrian connections are required where appropriate and practicable, taking the following into consideration: Through streets should generally be provided no more than 530 feet apart, and pedestrian connections should generally be provided no more than 330 feet apart. Through street and pedestrian connections should generally be at least 200 feet apart; 3. Emergency Vehicle Access to the Park Tenino Court provides critical emergency vehicle access route for the park. If the street connection is not built, Portland Parks & Recreation will be required to build an emergency vehicle turn-around space as part of the park improvement project. This would reduce the available flat area available for other park uses and features. Question 4: Why is Tenino Court being realigned to conflict with the existing community garden? Wouldn t it be better to choose a new alignment that avoids the garden? Recently, a staff team took a fresh look at the location of Tenino Court and how it impacts the design of Errol Heights Park. The assessment of impacts considered major design factors and the presence of the community garden. The community garden is an important element of the park now, and will be included as a feature in the newly designed park space. Three potential alignments for the location of Tenino Court were studied. A discussion of these alignments is provided below in Question 5, and a comparison table is shown on pages 6 and 7. Portland Parks & Recreation has determined that the best location of Tenino Court is the realignment called for in the master plan. A new location for the community garden is needed to allow for comprehensive park improvements. Tenino Court will be moved to the northern edge of the park property to increase the amount of undivided, flat space available for park features and activities. The planned realignment of the street is the best overall option for Errol Heights Park. It maintains the integrity of the park as envisioned by the community, and is the most cost effective of three street alignment options. 3

Question 4: continued The alignment of Tenino Court was an issue given serious consideration in 2005, during the community process that created the Errol Heights Master Plan. The master plan was developed with community involvement and approved by the Portland City Council. In 2011, as part of the 1000 Garden Plots Initiative, Errol Heights was identified as a location for a community garden. The garden, built in 2012, overlaps the realignment of Tenino Court called for by the master plan. The siting of the garden wasn t intended to override the master plan. It was viewed by Portland Parks & Recreation as a valuable interim use until future funds to develop the park were secured. Funding is now available to improve Errol Heights Park. A new project is underway to update the master plan and set community-supported priorities for park improvements. Portland Parks & Recreation is aware of the popularity and success of the garden, and will include it in the park design. A new location within the park will be determined as part of the community engagement process to design the park. The new Errol Heights Community Garden will be constructed in Fall 2018 to ensure a smooth transition. Question 5: What alignment options were considered for Tenino Court? What factors were assessed to make the decision on the realignment? As part of the park design process, the City of Portland has looked closely at the section of Tenino Court that passes through the park property. As discussed in Question 3, the City of Portland has determined that SE Tenino Court must remain a through street with connection to SE Tenino Drive. Three potential alignments for Tenino Court were studied as part of the overall design for Errol Heights Park. Four design factors were assessed: street construction cost, usable park space, park function, and user safety. These factors are discussed in detail below and a comparison table is provided on pages 6-7. The assessment confirms the best location for Tenino Court is the realignment called for in the Errol Heights Park Master Plan. This planned realignment moves the street from the existing location to the northeast edge of the park. It maintains the integrity of the park as envisioned by the community, is the most cost effective, provides the most usable park space with the highest park function, and provides the highest user safety of the three street alignment options. 4

Question 5: continued These factors were used to compare the impacts on the park design of the potential Tenino Court alignments: Street Construction Cost The total funding available for park improvements is $5.3 million. Portland Parks & Recreation must pay for street improvements as part of the Errol Heights Park project. The cost of the street construction reduces the available budget for all other desired improvements to the park. The estimated construction cost is based on the length of the street in each alignment. Estimated Street Construction Cost Option 1: $311,530 (415 linear feet) Option 2: $424,880 (566 linear feet) Option 3: $363,320 (484 linear feet) Usable Park Space Errol Heights Park is approximately 16 acres, with only 3 acres of flat, developable land available for park development. The remaining 13 acres are natural area and wetland that will not be developed. The usable park space available for recreation features and amenities is reduced by the area dedicated to the street right of way. Land that is used to construct Tenino Court is not available for recreation and park amenities. Park Function When designing a park, it is important that some park features and amenities are located near each other to function properly. For example, the play area and sports field are best if located near restrooms and drinking fountains. A well-functioning design brings these park amenities together, and avoids separating them by streets. The size and shape of a park property affects the park design. Small, narrow spaces can limit park design and function. User Safety Parks need to be safe and welcoming spaces for all visitors. Movement in the park needs to be designed with safety in mind. A street that divides the park space requires visitors to cross traffic as they move from one area to another. This has a negative impact on park safety as it creates risk for park users. A detailed comparison of the three alignments, using these key factors, is shown in the table below. The planned realignment of SE Tenino Court is shown as Option 1, the existing location of the street is Option 2, and Option 3 is midway between the other two alignments. 5

Tenino Court Alignment Comparisons Option 1 Planned Alignment Option 2 Option 3 SE Tenino Drive SE Tenino Drive SE Tenino Drive ROW ROW ROW SE Tenino Court SE Tenino Court SE Tenino Court Errol Heights Park Description This option follows the 2005 Master Plan and moves the street to the northeast edge of the park. This option requires that the community garden be relocated to another 17,000- square foot space within the park. This option keeps Tenino Court in the existing location and does not directly impact the community garden. This option is midway between the other two alignments. The new street separates the existing community garden from other areas of the park. Construction Cost This option has the shortest street length (415 linear feet), and lowest street construction cost of $311,530. This option has the longest street length (566 linear feet) and the highest street construction cost of $424,880. Steep slopes need to be filled with earth to match the adjacent grade for an accessible street and sidewalk. This option has the second longest street length (484 linear feet) and a cost of $363,320. 6

Tenino Court Alignment Comparisons Option 1 Planned Alignment Option 2 Option 3 Usable Park Space Park Function User Safety This option has the smallest street right of way, and offers the largest, undivided area for park improvements. Right of Way Area: 21,084 sq. ft. or.5 acre. This option offers the greatest flexibility to develop a park design that connects related features that function well together. This option enhances safety and minimizes risk with the largest undivided park space. The street is located at the northeast park boundary, minimizing risk to visitors within the park. This option uses the most park land for street right of way, resulting in the smallest usable space for park improvements. Right of Way Area: 30,150 sq. ft. or.7 acre. This negatively impacts park function because the street divides the park space into three sections, limiting the location of park features. This option has the highest negative impact to park user safety. Park features and amenities will be in three sections separated by a street. Visitors will be at greater risk as they cross the street to access other areas of the park. This option has the second largest street right of way. It divides the park into two sections, creating narrow spaces that limit the design of park improvements. Right of Way Area: 25,180 sq. ft. or.6 acre. This alignment negatively impacts park function because the street divides the park space into two park segments, one that is dedicated to the community garden, and the other narrow space for all other park activities. This option negatively impacts park safety by dividing the park space with a street. Like Option 2, this alignment requires visitors to cross the street to access features on the other side. 7