Questionnaire for pilot sites Collection of facts and information of pilot sites for building a comparative, transnational typology of alpine territories For project partners: Please fill in the predefined gaps and boxes and try to answer all the questions clearly and completely. Use the predefined boxes and stick to the space limitations. If space isn t enough, please use the attached document to add more information. The questionnaire will be transferred directly into a kind of factsheet of your pilot site. Therefor please try to give clear information and formulate it well, so that it can be used for presenting your pilot site. If you have questions concerning the filling in, the meaning of a question or anything else, do not hesitate to contact us (ispace Dagmar Lahnsteiner, dagmar.lahnsteiner@researchstudio.at, CEREMA David Caubel, david.caubel@cerema.fr) Name and type of the territory: Starnberg, Bavaria, Germany Location (political district / region, federal province, country, other relevant position information): county (14 municipalities) in Bavaria, Germany, part of the metropolitan area Munich (EMM) - PART A: MAIN TERRITORIAL FEATURES - Factor Description Please fill in Population Number of inhabitants (main residence) and year - shares by age groups - share of working population 133,621 (2015) - 14.68% under 15 years old 55.62% 15-64 years old 22.73% 65 and older - 54.4% working population Area Total area of the municipality in km² 487.73 km² (Starnberg county) Pop. density Number of inhabitants per km² (year) 274 inhab./km² (2015) Settlement density Number of inhabitants per km² settlement area/ theoretically inhabitable area (year) 133621/70,33km² 1899.9 inhab./km² (2015) Elevation Height above mean sea level in m Highest point in Berndorfer Buchet with 750m, lowest point in Ampermoos with 533m Settlement structure Topography of settlement area Sprawled settlements or mainly compact? Satellite areas around a centre or more disconnected centres/settlements? Physical barriers? Is it flat land / hilly terrain/ alpine valley and basin landscape? Other? The county consists of 14 municipalities of which two, Starnberg and Gauting, are arranged in a star-shape. The Starnberger lake is a natural physical barrier for Starnberg towards the south. In the west are the rural areas of the municipalities Inning, Seefeld, Andechs and Herrsching which are physically bordered by the Wörthsee, Pilsensee and Ammersee. The landscape of Starnberg county was shaped by 1
Functional characteristics Jobs Commuter balance Are there any characteristics describing special functions of the municipality (e.g.: popular tourist destination, concentration of jobs, school centre, regional centre, winter sport resort, economically attractive, isolated/ central/ interconnected to,..) Number of workplaces and employees within the municipality (year) Number of working population commuting to outside the municipality (year) Number of people commuting from outside into the municipality (year) glaciation. The Starnberger See, Ammersee, Wörthsee and Pilsensee are finger lakes which were created by deglaciation. Furthermore, the glacial period lead to a moraine landscape. This is also the case for Kloster Andechs which lies on a ridge. The presence of river Würm leads to the formation of further geological landscapes. This includes formation of lowland moors and valleys at Leustetten and Mühltal, respectively. - The county is located within the strong economic region Oberbayern, south of the state capital Munich. - Oberbayern is an attractive tourist area. Starnberg Fünfseenland recorded 91,282 overnight stays in 2016. The number of day tourists would be a little higher since the inhabitants of Munich use the region as recreation area. - Around ten secondary schools, three vocational schools, one technical college and 18 primary schools can be found in Starnberg county 10,664 workplaces (2014) with 48,754 employees (2016) 27,409 (2016) 29,025 (2016) 2
- PART B: MOBILITY SUPPLY AND DEMAND- 1. Modal split: Please insert the smallest-scale modal split values of traffic volume available for the municipality/territory adding also the scale, source, and year (= percentage of travellers using a particular type of transportation). Scale, source, year At county level, study mobility in Germany (MiD), 2008, Share by foot value in % by foot 17% Share bicycle value in % bicycle 16% Share MIV value in % motorized individual transport 58% (driver & passenger) Share PT value in % public transport 8% Share other/n.s. value in % other / not specified 0% 2. Public transport - Existing offer: Please describe the existing mobility offer in the municipality/ territory. - Which means of transport do exist? Local bus Regional bus Local train Long-distance train Urban railways (S-Bahn) Tramway Metro Other: - Frequency of public transport services: what is the shortest interval? < 5 minutes 5-15 min. 15-30 min. 30 60 min. > 60 minutes - How long is the travel time to the next regional/national centre? < 15 min OR the next centre is within the pilot site /municipality 15 30 minutes 30 60 minutes > 60 minutes - Is there a multi/intermodal hub? If yes, of which services does it consist (in the case of several hubs, choose a representative/ the best developed one)? No Yes, consisting of: Bus/tram station Railway station Metro station Park & Ride area Bicycle parking E-bike charging E-car charging Car sharing Bike rental Taxi rank Other: Bike&Ride 3. Public transport - incentives: What is done to make public transport attractive? Dedicated tariff system (discounted tickets, annual passes, combined/integrated tickets for different means of transport, special offers, etc.) Dedicated information (websites, smartphone apps, campaigns etc.) Other (max.150 characters): 4. Supplementary mobility offer and initiatives: Please give a brief description (+ year of implementation, owner/ operator) of supplementary public transport systems and innovative initiatives in the municipality/territory which assist the PT or help to reduce private car use (Park & Ride areas, Carpooling/ Carsharing initiatives, bus-on-demand / call bus, share taxi, Secure hitchhiking, etc.). (max. 5 listings with max. 300 characters each) E-start initiative (2015, Starnberg district office). Installation of charging stations for e-vehicles 3
within the county Regional management Munich southwest Express Bus X900 Car sharing, Bike sharing 5. Conditions for non-motorized private transport: How is the situation for biking and walking within the municipality/territory?(max. 500 characters) There is a 471 km biking road network, which is indicated by consistent VSGV signage. Within the municipalities, the much-frequented roads are equipped with sidewalks. Plus, there are numerous hiking tracks through the Fünf-Seen-Land. Are there additional offers like (free) (electric) bicycle rental, bike sharing or special measures/initiatives for pedestrians? (max. 500 characters) There is a free bicycle rental in Gauting organized by a small initiative. They aim for a consistent rental system for bicycles. 6. Local mobility knowledge: Which kind of data or studies are used or gathered on local mobility knowledge? Is there any kind of observation system in place to enhance the information about current and forecast local mobility needs, practices and CO2 impacts? (max. 5 listings with max. 300 characters each) Each year a customer satisfaction index is provided for the area of MVV and for every single means of transport (S-Bahn, U-Bahn, tram, regional bus) MiD (Mobility in Germany) 2008 a new one coming next year Regional database Real-time data collection of regional busses (Starnberg county commissioned MVV to carry out the project) 7. Mobility needs and demands: Do inhabitants or local stakeholders express mobility needs or gaps with regard to the current situation and territorial issues? If yes, what are the major ones? (max. 5 listings with max. 200 characters each) Dedicated personnel employed by Starnberg county as well as the MVV take care of the complaint management. Especially commuters and students ask for better coordinated MVV-Regionalbus schedules A smoothly working public transport network with good connections and transitions between traffic lines is most important to the inhabitants of the county. Numerous inquiries regarding the number of stops and their physical attributes have been received - PART C: MOBILITY AND SPATIAL PLANNING BACKGROUND - 1. Planning authorities: Please give an overview of the responsibilities concerning mobility and spatial/housing planning in the municipality/territory. Are there also authorities combining the spatial and mobility planning aspect? Mobility planning (max. 800 characters) Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure: Planning of federal traffic routes in coordination with every concerned administrative office at federal level. Interior Ministry of Bavaria for building and Spatial/housing planning (max. 800 characters) Federal Ministry for Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety: nationwide guideline and objectives concerning spatial and housing planning in coordination with every concerned administrative office at 4
transport: project planning at national level. Starnberg county: roads authority for supralocal road and bicycle lane planning, traffic management; local transportation plan for Public Transport Municipalities: planning and realization of mobility projects in the urban and municipal areas. federal level. Interior Ministry of Bavaria for building and transport: project planning based on the guideline and objectives in coordination with every concerned administrative office at national level. State development plan (LEP), Regional plan Starnberg county: conceptual planning, statement on the LEP, citizen information Municipalities: planning and realization of projects in the urban and municipal areas 2. Planning instruments: Which planning instruments and strategic documents influence /control spatial/housing and mobility planning in the municipality/territory THE MOST? In which way, at what time and territorial scale do they act? Are they obligatory? Think of any programmes, concepts, regulation, strategic processes etc. (max. 5 listings with max 400 characters each) Local transportation plan (current one from 2007, new one in 2018) with a 10-year scale - requested but voluntary (former obligatory) LEP at state level, obligatory Since 2013, development of the regional busses in the whole county. Completion in December 2017. Initiated by the new tendering of the (bus) lines, with a 8-year scale 3. Main objectives: What are current and forecast main objectives and guiding principles for the municipality/territory, linked with mobility issues(+ sources)? Think of local, regional and national scale. (max. 5 listings with max 200 characters each) Local: - The public transport shall contribute significantly to the mobility of the population and develop further towards an integrated system. - Good connection between each municipality and Starnberg city as well as between each municipal district and the main municipality - East-West connections in the county have to be improved - Considering the interests of mobility-impaired persons in the planning of public transport Regional: - Tangential development through regional bus connections between different train lines - Reduce road congestion by reducing the individual traffic - Improved perception of bus line offer National: - Reducing the CO2-emission - Ensure basic public services 4. Planning measures: What are concrete planning measures already in use within the municipality/ territory, helping to reduce CO2 and foster/push the usage and implementation of public transport and other low CO2 mobility options? E.g. carreduced building projects, precautionary land use (saving areas next to public transport infrastructure for 5
building compact settlements), subsidy for compact settlements, strengthening of town centres, regulation of residential densities next to public transport stops (max. 5 listings with max.300 characters each) Development of the regional bus lines that connect different train axes Connection between every municipal district and main municipality with regional busses -PART D: STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES In conclusion, regarding requirements, offer, planning and implementation of low CO2 mobility and related issues, what are: (max. 800 charcters each) - strengths & benefits of the municipality/territory? - weaknesses & problems of the municip./ territory? - Political and administrative player are very - Car affine population conscious about public transport - Partially heavy traffic loads, esp. in - Financial possibilities to develop the offer of public transport Starnberg town - Network development for e-mobility charging station - opportunities & challenges of the municip./territory? - threats & restrictions of the municipality/territory? - Population has high standards regarding the public transport - Young people move away from the idea of owning a private car - MVV tariff structure improvement - Development of the central urban railway line in Munich - Further development and promotion of individual transport - Promotion of public transport and e- mobility could be terminated - No further development and adaptation to modern mobility concepts, especially ticketing -PART E: BEST PRACTICES AND EXPERIENCES TO SHARE- Are there best practices or experiences examples (maybe yet mentioned) of reduced CO2 mobility offers / projects or initiatives: - WITHIN THE MUNICIPALITY/TERRITORY OR THE REGION which work very well and can be recommended to other municipalities with similar conditions? Examples with short explanations (max. 5 listings with max.300 characters each) - Express bus X900 express line which connects the counties of Starnberg and Fürstenfeldbruck - E-start initiative Sustainable promotion of electric mobility in Starnberg county. Many players of the county were consolidated under one roof Weblink or contact for further information verkehrsmanagement@lra-starnberg.de verkehrsmanagement@lra-starnberg.de - from OTHER MUNICIPALITIES/TERRITORIES which would be a good solution for the municipality/territory under review? Examples with short explanations (max. 5 listings with max.300 characters) Simply mobile. Environmental-friendly mobility at fair prices in Offenburg. A discount card for an Weblink or contact for further information Stadt Offenburg Historisches Rathaus 6
affordable rental of bicycles, car sharing and pedelecs from external suppliers. As a result, four stations near public transport stops have been installed. Hauptstraße 90 77652 Offenburg Are there lessons learned from less successful or failed experiences that could be shared in order to improve forthcoming actions in municipalities with similar conditions? (max. 500 characters) no -PART F: TOOLS FOR MOBILITY AND SPATIAL PLANNING Are there any tools/ software products your local authority uses to model effects on land-use and/or transport (e.g. low carbon scenarios) within the process of mobility or spatial planning? Please name them (+ Link and contact Person if available). no Do you make any tools for estimating effects of individual mobility behaviour and/or location choice available to your citizens? Or do you provide any information or links about such tools on your homepage? Please name them (+ Link and contact Person if available). MVV cost calculator for housing and mobility If you could wish for a (software) tool for sustainable land-use and/or transport decision making, what would it be like? Please name important characteristics, input, output, geographical scale and target groups. Simplified potential assessment. Input: routes and stops, population. Output: required stops, potential users. Scale: municipalities. Target group: administration, MVV 7