Wellsite Clay Pad Removal and Peat Inversion

Similar documents
Supplement of Carbon dynamics in boreal peatlands of the Yenisey region, western Siberia

Terms and Definitions. Characteristics and Qualities. Environmental Issues

Peatland Action Guidance for land managers. Installing peat dams. Updated May 2015

Bio-Engineering Techniques to Revegetate Streambanks

Alberta policy and regulations for grassland reclamation criteria, evolution of the criteria from the 1995 version to today

1/21/2014. Definitions vary widely Legal vs. functional Not always obvious. Wetlands are legally protected by Clean Water Act (1972)

A16 Building a garden path

Tree Pits Construction Guide

River Mile 10.9 Removal Action Overview

For Peat s Sake. Good management practices for Waikato peat farmers

4.6. Low Impact and Retentive Grading

Unit 6 Lesson 3 What Is Soil? Copyright Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company

Tilling Compacted Soils with RipPlows: A Disturbed Soil Restoration Technique David H. McNabb 1, Jean-Marie Sobze 2, and Amanda Schoonmaker 2

Chicken Responsibilities

Evolution of Reclamation Practices in NE Alberta

Chapter 1 - Lawn maintenance scheduling

a. Section includes planting soils specified by composition of the mixes.

Site Preparation. What to Look for in a Vegetation Implementation Plan. Plant Community Goals (restoration checklist) Plant Community Goals

Lake Nokomis Shoreline Enhancement Project

2.1.4 Roof Downspout Rain Gardens

Green Roofs for Urban Biodiversity: Latornell Symposium. Gavin Miller TRCA Flora Biologist November 2010


LANDFILL FINAL COVER AND MANAGEMENT OF LEACHATE SEEPS BELOW FINAL COVER

Erosion Control for Home Builders in the. City of Jacksonville

Site Formation Excavation - 6' depth square yard $8.00 $0.00 Grading square yard $1.50 $0.00 Hauling off-site - 6' depth square yard $10.00 $0.

Surface Coal Mining and Reclamation in ND. Guy Welch ND Public Service Commission

Horner-McLaughlin Woods: Soil Types

The water regime of the long-seasonally-frozen peat soils of the Northern Trans-Ural

The University of Iowa Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering SOIL MECHANICS 53:030 Final Examination 2 Hours, 200 points

RAIN GARDEN ILLINOIS URBAN MANUAL PRACTICE STANDARD. (feet) CODE 897 DEFINITION

Certain areas of your yard or property may not represent a good location for your rain garden. Don t plant your rain garden:

Landscape Restoration Specifications

Vegetation Management

The following general requirements will be met for all planter box installations:

Drainage & wet soil management. Dr Bill Cotching

3/26/2011. David Dods URS Corp., Overland Park, KS. Year 5. Photos: David Dods

Structural Stormwater Best Management Practices

Appendix D - Technical Design Criteria for BMPs

A Landowner s Guide to Creating Woodland Pools for Amphibians and Other Wildlife

Dealing with Soil Compaction

MARBLE RIVER WIND POWER PROJECT Agricultural Protection Measures

Low Gradient Velocity Control Short Term Steep Gradient [1] Channel Lining Medium-Long Term Outlet Control Soil Treatment Permanent

815 NE 172 nd Avenue Vancouver, WA Installation Manual

NEW GARDEN MAINTENANCE GUIDE. Enjoy a luscious garden with our simple month-by-month garden TLC guide

Turning your Dam into habitat. By Damien Cook

Urban Conservation Practice Physical Effects ESTABLISHMENT, GROWTH, AND HARVEST NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT

NORTH HARRIS COUNTY REGIONAL WATER AUTHORITY STANDARD SPECIFICATION. Section SODDING

A. Install all temporary erosion control measures (in accordance with MNDOT General Conditions 2573) prior to site disturbance.

List of Equipment, Tools, Supplies, and Facilities:

Area 3 Envirothon Soils Questions Key

URBAN SOILS & SEATTLE EXAMPLES

PROTECTIVE MEASURES FOR TREES DURING CONSTRUCTION

Compaction. Compaction purposes and processes. Compaction as a construction process

Success with Trees in Your Yard. Debbie D. Dillion Extension Agent, Horticulture Serving Culpeper, Madison, & Orange Counties

SECTION AMENDED TOPSOIL

Effect of soil cover system design on cover system performance and early tree establishment

WaterSmart. Converting Thirsty Lawns to Beautiful Beds: Turf Removal and Efficient Irrigation

4.5 City of Indianapolis Stormwater Green Infrastructure Guidance: Bioretention (rain gardens) Bioretention Fact Sheet Bioretention Technical Design

What is fieldwalking?

Yorkshire Peat Partnership Technical Specification 3. Flat or gently sloping bare peat Stabilisation and Re-vegetation 1.

If you are not able to turn in your notebook see me or Dan ASAP

Offering Soil Solutions to All Your Growing Needs. Product Catalog

5. LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS

Background restoration

Polpis Bike Path. General Impacts: 1.47 acres forested, marsh, shrub swamp

BACKYARD POND. Backyard Pond. A pond or water garden will likely become the focal point for all your backyard conservation.

SITE TOPSOIL & FINISH GRADING

DEALING WITH STORM WATER MANAGEMENT

THE TENNESSEE VEGETABLE GARDEN

Information for File # JTF

INSTALLATION TIPS. Site Preparation

J. Paul Guyer, P.E., R.A.

New Orchard Development: Site Evaluation through Planting. David Doll Farm Advisor UCCE Merced County

A Glossary of Wetland Terminology

2014 Iowa FFA Soil Judging CDE Exam

UBC Technical Guidelines Section Edition Planting Preparation Page 1 of 6

Biodiversity revegetation project

11 Convey Water in Swales

Ombrogenous Peat Swamps and Development

Recommended Practices

Soils and Water in Your Landscape. Mary Hattendorf Northern Water Spring Fair 2016

Pondless Waterfall Vault

Washtenaw County Conservation District 7203 Jackson Rd Ann Arbor MI Phone: (734) x 5 Fax: (734) Web:

Hitchhiker Planting: Development of Combination Container Stock of Target Woody and Herbaceous Plants

Land Formation. Field Development

Sydney Road Reclaimed Water Main, Plant City, Florida. Prepared for: Jones Edmunds & Associates, Inc.

3.44b. Soil Classification AK & BR

HG Homeowner Landscape Series: Planting Problems of Trees and Shrubs

Rain Gardens. A Welcome Addition to Your Landscape

SUPPORTING DOCUMENT POST-CONSTRUCTION SOIL QUALITY AND DEPTH WORKSHEET

ACTIVITY: Trees, Shrubs and Vines ES 10

CHAPTER 4. SPECIAL CONDITION EROSION CONTROL MEASURES

BMP #: Recharge Garden/Rain Garden/Bioretention Garden

Soil Geography Notes JC-Learn. JC-Learn. Geography Notes Soil. 1 P a g e

Part C: ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN

There are different types of weathering weathering and weathering. Both types work together to change Earth s surface.

Feet. Overland. Drainage Area Boundary. To Swale. Swale. To Catch Basin. Culvert Pipe. To Drain Outfall. NRCS Soil Area Boundary

CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR RIP RAP, ROCK PROTECTION AND GRAVEL SHEETING

CHECKLIST BMPs for FIELD NURSERIES REGULATIONS, SITE SELECTION, WATER MANAGEMENT

UNIFIED FACILITIES GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS

Transcription:

Wellsite Clay Pad Removal and Peat Inversion TECHNICAL NOTE #24 PEATLAND RESTORATION (JANUARY 2012) UPDATED: JUNE 2017 INTRODUCTION Reclaiming in-situ well pads built in peatland presents many challenges. With the release of the Reclamation Criteria for Wellsites and Associated Facilities for Peatlands, new emphasis is placed on the re-establishment of peat-forming communities that are on a trajectory towards functional peatlands. Our project offers an innovative approach that removes the clay pad and geotextile, fluffs and re-profiles the buried peat, followed by the transfer of a moss layer to introduce propagules for peatland vegetation development. This technical note describes the civil earth work procedures to remove the clay pad and to create a flat, hydrologically connected peat surface suitable for peatland vegetation development. The re-vegetation following the civil earth work is addressed in a separate technical note series Using Moss Layer Transfer Technique (MLTT) for Peatland Revegetation on In-situ Facilities. 1 PEATLAND RESTORATION (JANUARY 2012) UPDATED: JUNE 2017 nait.ca/borealresearch

THE SITE INVERSION PAD (IPAD) The 1.4-hectare study site is located within a treed bog/ poor fen complex in the Peace River oil sands region (Figure 1). The surrounding area is dominated by: Black spruce (Picea mariana) Labrador tea (Rhododendron groenlandicum) Lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea) Sphagnum mosses (Sphagnum spp.) The pad was constructed in December 2006 using borrowed clay from a nearby upland site. The woody vegetation was laid down and covered with geotextile followed by a 1.4 m-thick clay pad. The well was drilled but never actually operated. Figure 1. View of clay pad before reclamation. The area is sparsely vegetated with upland weed species. MAIN CHALLENGES The thick clay pad is dry and hydrologically disconnected from the surrounding peatland. The mineral substrate is different, both physically and chemically, from peat. In order for peatland vegetation to develop, we need to create a saturated peat substrate by removing the clay pad and geotextile. The challenges are: 1. How to remove the clay pad and what to do with the removed clay 2. How to target the elevation to prevent the creation of a pond after pad removal RECLAMATION PROCEDURES Winter civil earth work was done to take advantage of frozen conditions The clay pad overburden was returned to the original borrow pit and the geotextile was disposed of The buried peat was fluffed and re-profiled A flat, saturated peat surface was created with the elevation restored to 10 cm below that of the hollows (low depressions) of the surrounding natural peatland Three approaches were used: 1. PEAT INVERSION for areas where deep peat was present 2. CLAY INVERSION and 3. MIXED INVERSION were used where only shallow peat was available No barriers were created between the natural peatland and the reclaimed site Edges of the site were contoured into the surrounding peatland Note: Because this was a research project with multiple experimental trials, the operator worked in long strips 4 m wide from north to south. The exact operational procedure may vary depending on each site/project. 2 PEATLAND RESTORATION (JANUARY 2012) UPDATED: JUNE 2017 nait.ca/borealresearch

APPROACH 1 PEAT INVERSION COMPLETE PAD REMOVAL AND PEAT FLUFFING (DEEP PEAT) The clay material and geotextile were removed using a backhoe with a digging bucket and transported to the borrow pit. This exposed the peat buried beneath the pad, which had been compressed by the weight of the clay overburden (Figure 2). The peat depth beneath the pad varied across the site, therefore fluffing helped to achieve the target elevation only where the compressed peat depth was greater than 60 cm (deep peat). The peat needed to be fluffed (or pseudo de-compacted) in order to raise the surface elevation to a similar height as the surrounding natural peatland and to restore the lateral and vertical water flow (Figure 3). We aimed for 10 cm lower than the hollows (i.e. low depressions) in the natural peatland, presuming there would be a rebound effect as water started to flow into the reclaimed site. Fluffing is done using a backhoe and bucket or rake attachment to work-up or flip the surface of peat (about 1 m deep) in order to increase volume. The peat was fluffed, then lightly tapped down and smoothed to remove any large trapped air pockets. This step created a flat surface to provide maximum contact between the peat surface and the donor material to be applied post-civil earth work. For details on how to re-vegetate the recreated peat surface, see our technical note series titled Using Moss Layer Transfer Technique (MLTT) for Peatland Revegetation on In-situ Facilities. Figure 2. Clay pad material on the right waiting for removal. In the foreground, exposed peat as the geotextile is being peeled back by the hoe. Note the elevation differences between the surface of the clay (right), the exposed peat (middle) and the natural vegetation (left). STEP BY STEP 1. Remove clay and geotextile with backhoe and digging bucket and dispose off-site. 2. Fluff the peat with the hoe bucket (up to 1 m in depth) 3. Tap down and smooth the surface to the desired elevation (10 cm below elevation of the hollows in the nearby peatland). Figure 3. Left: The peat surface after clay removal waiting for fluffing. Right: The peat surface following fluffing. 3 PEATLAND RESTORATION (JANUARY 2012) UPDATED: JUNE 2017 nait.ca/borealresearch

APPROACH 2 CLAY INVERSION MULTI-STEP BURIAL OF CLAY BENEATH INVERTED PEAT (SHALLOW PEAT) In areas with shallow underlying peat, fluffing alone was insufficient to raise the exposed peat to the elevation of the adjacent natural peatland. The CLAY INVERSION involved inserting a layer of the clay pad material under the newly exposed peat surface. This process resulted in 40 cm of exposed peat on top of a layer of buried clay material (Figure 4). The end goals to achieve are: No clay chunks left on the peat surface, with special care to contour the reclaimed area into the surrounding area A peat surface that is a minimum 40 cm thick on top of the inverted clay material A peat surface that must be 10 cm lower than the hollows of the natural area. The appropriate volume of clay needed to achieve the correct surface elevation varied based on the amount of available peat Figure 4. Conceptual diagram of the CLAY INVERSION process. STEP BY STEP Figure 4 shows the multi-step procedure to remove and bury clay under inverted peat. 1. Use a backhoe with a digging bucket to remove the clay material for a small area and pile on the adjacent remaining clay pad. 2. Remove the remaining clay and discard the geotextile; this can be returned to the borrow pit with leftover clay material. 3. Excavate the underlying peat material and deposit it in a separate pile. 4. Establish temporary markers for the desired clay and peat depth to assist the operator. 5. Half-fill the excavated area with the piled clay (Figure 5-B). The amount required will depend on the amount of available peat (which is going to sit on top). 6. Scrape the peat into the hole on top of the clay. Using the bucket, lightly tap down and smooth the surface (Figure 5-C). 4 PEATLAND RESTORATION (JANUARY 2012) UPDATED: JUNE 2017 nait.ca/borealresearch

Figure 5. CLAY INVERSION procedures. A. Clay to be removed (left side) and the completed clay peat inversion using the multi-step technique (right side). B. Clay has been replaced in the hole where peat had been excavated and placed on top. C. Inverted peat over buried clay being tapped and smoothed for a uniform surface. Note the smooth transition between the surrounding peatland and the recalimed surface. D. CLAY INVERSION areas thawed in the spring, ready for re-vegetation. 5 PEATLAND RESTORATION (JANUARY 2012) UPDATED: JUNE 2017 nait.ca/borealresearch

APPROACH 3 MIXED INVERSION SINGLE STEP CLAY-GEOTEXTILE-PEAT INVERSION (SHALLOW PEAT) The single-step inversion technique was an attempt to shorten the inversion process, thereby reducing operational costs. This method sees the partial removal of the majority of the clay pad off-site, leaving 20 to 30 cm of clay, followed by a one-scoop inversion (flip) of the remaining clay, geotextile and buried peat. During the flipping, geotextile was broken to allow vertical water fluctuation and mixing of peat and clay was inevitable. The buried clay and geotextile underneath was not uniform (compared to approach 2), creating a variable peat surface even after careful tapping and smoothing of the inverted peat. As such, this approach led to the least-desirable peatland vegetation response. Therefore this is not a recommended practice compared to the other two approaches. LESSONS TO DATE 2017 1. Creating a flat, saturated, hydrologically connected peat surface is most critical to successful peatland vegetation development. The exact techniques to achieve such end goals can vary depending on site conditions. 2. PEAT INVERSION (approach 1) was the fastest and easiest method to creating the desired peat surface. However, it was only effective in areas with deep peat (>1 m) below the pad. 3. Areas with shallow peat (<0.5 m) beneath the pad required some clay material to be buried under the peat surface in order to reach the desired elevation. The multi-step CLAY INVERSION (approach 2) achieved the desirable peat surface. It was effective in areas with shallow peat below the pad, but was timeconsuming and therefore expensive compared to PEAT INVERSION. 4. The peat surface did not rebound as much as expected. Some areas of the pad have become too wet for moss establishment, and are instead dominated by sedges and cattails which tolerate wetter conditions. Introduction of peatland sedges (Carex spp.) can effectively control invasion by cattails in such areas and should be considered during initial site monitoring. VISIT OUR WEBSITE nait.ca/borealresearch ISSN 2371-462X Photo credits: BRI CONTACT US boreal@nait.ca 780.648.2600 AUTHORS Melanie Bird, Bin Xu, Jean-Marie Sobze, Amanda Schoonmaker (BRI) Line Rochefort (Laval University) 6 PEATLAND RESTORATION (JANUARY 2012) UPDATED: JUNE 2017 nait.ca/borealresearch