Advisory Design Panel Minutes

Similar documents
Advisory Design Panel Minutes

Advisory Design Panel Minutes

City of Surrey. Advisory Design Panel Minutes

Advisory Design Panel Minutes

Advisory Design Panel Minutes

Advisory Design Panel Minutes

Advisory Design Panel Minutes

WINDSOR GLEN DESIGN GUIDELINES

City of Surrey. Advisory Design Panel Minutes

THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF WEST VANCOUVER DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES MUNICIPAL HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER THURSDAY, JULY 19, 2018

Site Planning. 1.0 Site Context. 2.0 Pedestrian Circulation Systems. Pag e 2-23

Advisory Design Panel Minutes

Walnut Creek Transit Village Design Guidelines. Part Three III - 25

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

City of Surrey. Advisory Design Panel Minutes

NEW WESTMINSTER DESIGN PANEL Tuesday, June 27, :00p.m. Council Chamber

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NORTH VANCOUVER

FLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist

Advisory Design Panel Minutes

SMALL LOT DESIGN STANDARDS. An Illustrated Working Draft for Test Implementation

Planning Board Hearing October 20th, 2016

B L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development

Advisory Design Panel Minutes

VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION

KEY MAP DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AREA MAP. Sunnymede North Sub-Area Plan

MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES Site Plan and Design Review Principles Checklist

Advisory Design Panel Minutes

URBAN DESIGN PEER REVIEW PANEL MINUTES

City of Surrey. Advisory Design Panel Minutes

1. Welcome to the Squamish Nation Traditional Territory Ha7lh en skwalwn Kwis tl'iknumut tl'a Skwxwuu7mesh Uxwumixw

Rezoning Information booklet 6600 Cambie Street

MEMORANDUM. This memo deals with proposed amendments to previously issued Development Permit No for Park Royal North.

CENTERS AND CORRIDORS

1.3 TOWNHOUSES AND ROWHOUSES

4.0 Design Guidelines For The Village Centre. South fields Community Architectural Design Guidelines Town of Caledon

PRINCE EDWARD COUNTY HIGHWAY CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDE

THE CORPORATION OF DELTA ADVISORY DESIGN PANEL. Laura Ryan, Planner Yvette Luke, Senior Planner Candice Dannhauer, Recording Clerk

Town of Cedarburg Design Guidelines & Standards Commercial / Multi Family / Senior Care /Institutional/ Government Facilities Adopted August 6, 2014

MAPLE RIDGE ADVISORY DESIGN PANEL

Chapter 4: Jordan Road Character District

AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK

Landscape Design Requirements and Guidelines for Private Lots in the Old Town North Neighborhood

Duplex Design Guidelines

Rezoning. Rezone from C-4 and RA to RF-9C and RF-12C to allow subdivision into approximately 47 small single family lots in East Clayton.

Architectural Style. The utilization of forms from any of the following traditional styles are acceptable: Craftsman Prairie French Country

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

4. INDUSTRIAL 53 CASTLE ROCK DESIGN

for Master Planned Development Framework Design Standards & Guidelines

DRAFT DESIGN GUIDELINES

Greater East Wenatchee Urban Growth Area. Design Standards & Guidelines

Proposed for Vic West Neighbourhood Plan. Design Guidelines for Intensive Residential Development - Townhouse and Attached Dwelling

Chapter 5: Mixed Use Neighborhood Character District

The broad range of permitted and special uses allowed in the district remain, but some descriptions have been clarified.

lot flankage Y street 16m 6m landscape strip for large site 3m landscape strip for small medium site

East Bayshore Road Neighbourhood

Division VI Community Mixed Use (CMU) Architectural Guidelines and Standards

The following concept plans and illustrations are the result of this 10 month study of the alley connections from CSU to the River District.

Architectural Review Board Report

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

Design Guidelines - 1 -

Mixed Use Centres Development Permit Guidelines

Multi family Residential Development Permit Area

#1 Ewen Avenue Multi-Family

(DC1) Direct Development Control Provision DC1 Area 4

EXISTING CONDITIONS 41. Existing Conditions

CITY CLERK. Consolidated Clause in North York Community Council Report 8, which was considered by City Council on October 26, 27 and 28, 2004.

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

Bel-Air Lexus Automobile Service Station

DRAFT Northeast Quadrant of Kipling Avenue and Highway 7 DRAFT AUGUST 29, Goals Land Use. The goals of this Plan are to:

EXISTING VEHICULAR & PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION

BUILDING SCALE AND SETBACKS 5 ELEMENTS:... 5 FAÇADES (COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL) 5

Planning Board Briefing

City of Vaughan Urban Design Guidelines for Infill Development in Established Low-Rise Residential Neighbourhoods

appendix and street interface guidelines

599 Kennedy Road - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Long Branch-Wayne Local Park Renovation Project

Appendix A COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Bayshore Boulevard Home Improvement District Design Guidelines

3.1 community vision. 3.3 required plan elements

R STREET CORRIDOR NEIGHBORHOOD Site Plan and Design Review Supplemental Guidelines Checklist

FRUITVALE TRANSIT VILLAGE (Phase 2) Residential Project

DESIGN REVIEW STANDARDS CITY OF LANGLEY

City of Redlands Architectural Guidelines for Non-Residential Development

Urban Design Brief to 1557 Gordon Street & 34 Lowes Road West

Community Mixed Use Zone Districts (CMU)

September 30, 2014 Ms. Lorraine Weiss Department of Community Development City of San Mateo 330 West 20th Avenue San Mateo, CA

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BRIEF

Attachment 1 TOWN OF NEW TECUMSETH. Manual for the Preparation of an Urban Design Report

Development and Engineering Services

Smart Growth Development Checklist

URBAN DESIGN PEER REVIEW PANEL MINUTES

D. Landscape Design. 1. Coverage Intent: To provide adequate landscaping materials that enhance the appearance of development projects.

TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH San Mateo County. Architecture and Design Review Board Minutes

The open space system should provide connective elements, relate to natural resources, and enhance the suburban character of the landscape..

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 721 FRANKLIN BLVD, CAMBRIDGE August 2018

Design Guidelines. Roosevelt. Mike Podowski DPD Design Guidelines Ordinance ATT 13 August 13, 2012 Version #1

LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL

Guidelines. Building. The minimum setback of an attached garage from the lot line shall be 6m. 4. Zoning Provision

DOWNTOWN TRANSCONA URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

FORMER CANADIAN FORCES BASE (CFB) ROCKCLIFFE SECONDARY PLAN. Official Plan Amendment XX to the Official Plan for the City of Ottawa

Transcription:

Advisory Design Panel Minutes Parks Boardroom #1 City Hall 14245-56 Avenue Surrey, B.C. THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 2, 2010 Time: 4:15 p.m. Chair: L. Mickelson Panel Members: K. Newbert M. Ehman R. Myers S. Lyon T. Ankenman comments in absentia Guests: R. Stout dys architecture K. Obrovac dys architecture R. Thompson Chernoff Thompson Architects G. Peters Chernoff Thompson Architects Staff Present: H. Bello, Planning & Development T. Ainscough, Planning & Development T. Mueller, Legislative Services A. RECEIPT OF MINUTES It was Moved by M. Ehman Seconded by R. Myers That the minutes of the Advisory Design Panel meeting of August 19, 2010 be received. Carried B. SUBMISSIONS 4:00 PM 1. File No.: 7908-0260-00 New or Resubmit: Resubmit Last Submission Date: August 19, 2010 Description: 4-storey supportive housing apartment (YWCA) Address: 13775 70 Avenue (Newton Town Centre) Developer: Andrew Hiscox, CitySpaces Consulting Ltd. Architect: Richard Stout, dys architecture Landscape Architect: Bryce Gauthier, Sharp & Diamond Planner: Ron Gill Urban Design Planner: Hernan Bello K. Newbert Arrived at 4:14 p.m. S. Lyon Arrived at 4:17 p.m. The Project Architect described the resubmission as follows: Tried to address the primary comments from the Panel. There were a broad range of comments and a response letter was provided. A revised landscape plan was provided to Panel Members at the meeting. h:\adp\minutes\2010 minutes\min adp 2010 09 02.docx Page 1

The project was described as a BC Housing Development under strict budget guidelines. It was explained there was a very short turn around to respond to the Panel comments from the August 19 ADP meeting. At the August 19 meeting, the Panel expressed concerns about the front entrance to make it more pronounced and readable and to respond more to the context. The proposed design response to the ADP recommendations had to be costed before a response could be agreed upon. Proposed design changes include: o Have included some elements of the Newton Library. The balconies have wood detailing and there are raked roof lines over the balconies. The amount of metal cladding has been reduced and replaced with hardie panel. o The silver corrugated metal on the lower floors has been changed to a zinc colour and the top floor to yellow ochre hardie panel. o Windows are now grouped to provide vertical articulation. o Facades have been strengthened by pulling out the south floor overhangs and repeating the gluelam struts. o North elevation - the canopy over the entrance was strengthened and angled toward the garage entrance. It has a balcony behind it and is a solid form with colour. The upper balconies and roofs reflect the same colour. o Landscape - a row of cylindrical poplars was added from the access walkway out to the sidewalk. Tenant gardens have been relocated to a less shaded area. The front yard has been softened and the sloped section of the yard has been landscaped as well. o The elevator could not be moved due to significant cost constraints. ADVISORY DESIGN PANEL STATEMENT OF REVIEW 13775 70 Avenue (Newton Town Centre) File No. 7908-0260-00 It was Moved by S. Lyon Seconded M. Ehman That the Advisory Design Panel (ADP) recommends that the applicant address the following issues to the satisfaction of the Planning and Development Department. Carried STATEMENT OF REVIEW COMMENTS Form and Character The Panel advised that the revisions are a positive response to the following issues: o The window elevation composition is improved. o Breaking out the top floor is a logical thing to do. o There is a sense of enclosure for the balconies. h:\adp\minutes\2010 minutes\min adp 2010 09 02.docx Page 2

o Support the material changes and details. o The facade is much improved and looks friendlier o The use of aluminum panels is a major improvement in articulation and response to the context. One panel member suggested - keep the wood posts supporting the balconies but not angle them and consider using hardie panel at the parapet above the roof level eyebrow. Elevation colours and materials: o Recommend using a more muted yellow or beige at the top floor to compliment the natural wood being used and to respond to the Newton library. o Recommend natural concrete for the first floor to respond to the library. Landscaping Compacted gravel pathway will limit use by children for rollerblading and will cause problems with granular material being tracked onto patio and into building. Consider using permeable asphalt. Recommend providing a path to the communal gardens. Consider moving the garden shed closer to communal gardens. Consider providing additional site furnishings to offer a range of opportunities for socialization and private contemplation, e.g., benches, picnic tables. CPTED and Accessibility All previous accessibility concerns have been addressed. The Project Architect made the following comments: Thanked the Panel for the comments. Project has retained LEED Gold rating and underground parking despite constraints. 4:45 PM 2. File No.: 7910-0214-00 New or Resubmit: New Description: City of Surrey Animal Care and Adoption Centre Address: 17910 Colebrook Road (Cloverdale) Developer: Jean Lamontagne, City of Surrey Architect: Rand Thompson, Chernoff Thompson Architects Landscape Architect: Ken McKillop, Durante Kreuk Planner: Jennifer McLean Urban Design Planner: Tom Ainscough h:\adp\minutes\2010 minutes\min adp 2010 09 02.docx Page 3

The Urban Design Planner provided an overview of the project: The location is in the Cloverdale Area, south of the town centre, accessed off of HWY 15 or 176 Street. The building has a complex functional program. The core business is adoption and the animal shelter. There are also education and retail functions. The building has a total area of 16,000 square feet; half is roofed exterior space and half is interior space. There is also a barn facility for large animals in the corner of the site. The surrounding uses are agricultural and industrial. On the same lot is a 12 bed homeless shelter. The site is zoned A1. The setbacks are 30 metres for all the yards and the siting for the building generally complies with the setback requirements. The main entrance of the building is complex due to the multiple uses. A contemporary approach to form and character has been requested, similar to more recent buildings in Cloverdale such as the Cloverdale Recreation Centre, the Surrey Museum and Kwantlen College. The applicant and the Panel were asked to comment on: o how the building entry sequence should be handled; o how the form and character could respond to the context in a contemporary way. The Project Architect made the following comments: The site is south of the Cloverdale town centre with train tracks immediately to the north and agricultural uses in the surrounding area. The OPTIONS Services to Community Society group home is located nearby. Went through a site planning process and considered options for the building orientation. The site is surrounded by trees. There is lower scrub brush surrounding the development. Access is from HWY 15 and Colebrook Road. The parking is located at the interior of the site. A public welcome area and an animal control component is located on the rear of the building and screened with plant material and a wall. This will be a LEED Silver project. LEED features include ground source heating and cooling. The facility consists of a lot of small rooms. The largest room is a classroom and it located on the Colebrook Road side to provide street presence. Research included a review of 20 similar facilities. There are no comparable facilities in the Lower Mainland. George Miers, an animal shelter specialist from San Francisco was engaged to provide peer review and recommendations. Several entries are provided for different functions with separate waiting zones and courtyards. Elements were added to the front of the building to make it appear lively, contemporary, and appeal to families and children. h:\adp\minutes\2010 minutes\min adp 2010 09 02.docx Page 4

There entry roofs are cantilevered with struts with applicable signage to mark them. The building is understated and a monolithic grey tone was used. Stone will be square edge, not the rustic type as shown on the elevations. The roof is open web steel joist with lots of solar tubes in each animal area. The barn is very simple and in the character of other agricultural buildings in Cloverdale. The building was sited to allow for future expansion. The parking and the driveways will be asphalt will explore a permeable driveway. The Landscape Representative made the following comments: Sticking with few species and drought tolerant plantings. Tree planting is proposed to screen the front of the dog kennel areas. The cleared area and aspen trees act as a transition to the surrounding forest. A wall separates the public and staff zones. Storm water features include bioswales at the parking lot and a retention pond. Flowering trees are located at the front of the building for colour. The back area has a series of benches and seating areas with flowering trees. There is a large red oak tree in the turn-around area. There is some hedging that occurs in some of the lower areas of the plan. ADVISORY DESIGN PANEL STATEMENT OF REVIEW 17910 Colebrook Road (Cloverdale) File No. 7910-0214-00 It was Moved by R. Myers Seconded S. Lyon That the Advisory Design Panel (ADP) recommends that the applicant address the following issues to the satisfaction of the Planning and Development Department. Carried STATEMENT OF REVIEW COMMENTS Context and Site Circulation Recommend greater design development of arrival sequence, i.e., bus drop off, parking, and pedestrian access. Turning radius for buses is a concern. Consider gravel for the entire driveway to make it more casual and eliminate the need for catch basins. Trails through remaining forested area would be valuable for dog walking opportunities. h:\adp\minutes\2010 minutes\min adp 2010 09 02.docx Page 5

Form and Character The presentation is nicely done and graphics are very clear. The plan seems to be well resolved given the complexity of the project. Design development is required for the three entrance doors and entry canopies. The main entrances are not well defined. Would benefit from better structured way finding, possibly a trellis or peristyle with large hanging signs. The west entrances could be resolved differently. Could be the way the foreground is treated. There are three significant entrances, that could be made into a more pedestrian element and provide shading to the glass. There is more that could be done with the exterior to unify the three entrances. Consider providing a major walkway as a long front porch that leads into the other three entrances. Pedestrians could walk up to the porch and then have three entrances to select. The arrival sequence is not as well defined as it should be. It is a challenge that two of the three entrances are treated similarly. It may be confusing to know what door to go to. Should not rely on signage to do the job. There should be a hierarchy of spaces as the building is approached. The entrances could be articulated differently. Consider a larger scale entrance to provide more clarity. The skewed classroom requires design review and development. The architecture is a mainly linear. Pitching and turning the roof appears awkward. Consider sloping the roof in one direction and glazing the entire corner. As a special element, the corner should have glass all the way around with special detailing treatment. Suggest use of more "agrarian" materials and forms. Stone cladding appears out of context concrete is recommended. Raw concrete would age nicely and provide great support for the wood beams. There are ways to modernize the look and still use wood or metal cladding. Consider using aspects of the barn treatment in the larger building. The big roof begs to be a green roof. A green roof would enhance the approach to the entry and may help achieve LEED Gold Level Certification. Landscaping Lawn / dog play area need to be fenced if program allows dogs off leash. Consider vinyl coated chain link for the dog play training area. This lawn area will be under extensive wear and tear. Irrigation will help. Most public dog park areas bring wood chips in. For children s programming, consider providing some picnic tables. Reconsider extent of north facing patio at classroom. May not be used much in this climate. h:\adp\minutes\2010 minutes\min adp 2010 09 02.docx Page 6

CPTED and Accessibility The entrances should have wheelchair let downs and be fully accessible. Ensure the washrooms for the public are fully wheelchair accessible and have power doors where applicable. Counters for staff to address customers should be accessible height for staff and clients in wheelchairs. Parking stalls that are adjacent to the building should be paved for accessibility. Sustainability CBIP energy performance is not a difficult target. 25% better than MNECB is a prerequisite for LEED, so there will be no energy points. Recommend more ambitious LEED rating and energy performance targets. Recommend more shade for the west facade with overhangs or shade trees (deciduous). Support the on-site storm-water management. The bioswale area could be larger in this context. The Project Architect made the following comments: The entries have been a huge point of discussion on this project and present some unique challenges. Thanked the Panel for their comments and will consider them. C. OTHER COMPETENT BUSINESS D. NEXT MEETING The next Advisory Design Panel is scheduled for Thursday, September 16, 2010, Parks and Recreation Meeting Room #1. E. ADJOURNMENT The Advisory Design Panel meeting adjourned at 5:48 p.m. Jane Sullivan, City Clerk Leroy Mickelson, Advisory Design Panel h:\adp\minutes\2010 minutes\min adp 2010 09 02.docx Page 7