OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA

Similar documents
ROSEMONT 138KV TRANSMISSION LINE SITING STUDY PROJECT

Farmers Investment Co. (FICO) Sahuarita Farms Specific Plan & Minor General Plan Amendment Community Meeting July 1, 2014


Farmers Investment Co. (FICO) Continental Farms

Town of Sahuarita Open Space Plan Element. University of Arizona Planning Program Projects Team

4.1 AESTHETICS AND VISUAL QUALITY

APPENDIX C Agency Scoping Meeting Materials

Preliminary Management Recommendations for the proposed Sedona Verde Valley Red Rock National Monument

Irvington to Kino 138 kv Transmission Line Project April 2018

Nicole Ryan Governmental Relations Manager Conservancy of Southwest Florida 1450 Merrihue Drive Naples, FL 34102

NOTICE OF PREPARATION

Design Review Commission Report

ROSEMONT 138kV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT. Public Open House Meeting #2 August 27, 2009

Chapter 5: Recreation

DRAFT MAP AMENDMENT FLU 04-4

glenwood canyon design process I-70 Statement of Direction TRG Recreation Subcommittee Colorado Division of Highways August 11, 1976 prepared by the

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation June 5, 2008 SAN DIEGO RIVER TRIBUTARY CANYONS PROJECT. File No Project Manager: Megan Johnson

2019 Hillcrest Campus LRDP EIR Scoping Meeting

Application for Certificate of Environmental Compatibility and Public Need

Draft Planning Commission Resolution Proposed Commission Policy and Planning Code Amendment

OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION

Memorandum CITY OF DALLAS

CITY CLERK. Consolidated Clause in North York Community Council Report 8, which was considered by City Council on October 26, 27 and 28, 2004.

Otay Regional Trail Alignment Study. Public Workshop March 14 th, 2017 from 5:30-8 p.m.

SONOMA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION

Sierra Club Comments on ACOE Public Notice NAE Re: Proposed Town Neck Beach Project at Sandwich, Massachusetts

Rocky Areas Project Guidance HABITAT

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

RE: Application for FERC Project No , Scott s Mill dam hydropower proposal

Biology and Wildlife. Erosion, Drainage, and Storm water. Chavez Ranch Road Project Comment Response Table - Page 1 January 2017

SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR EXTENSION. Environmental Evaluation and Basic Engineering Results PUBLIC MEETING/OPEN HOUSE November 18, 2009

LEGAL NOTICE. City of Tacoma Determination of Environmental Nonsignificance. Fred Wagner, Wagner Development. Demolition of Manitou school buildings

Public Hearing. Charlotte County-Punta Gorda MPO - Meeting Rooms A and B March 14, open house at 4 p.m., formal presentation at 5 p.m.

Draft Stillwater 2030 Comprehensive Plan- Goals and Policies

OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLANS (OCPs) AND ZONING BYLAWS (ZBs): PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE

OAKLAND COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT 2800 Watkins Lake Road, Waterford, Michigan

Prepared by: Casey Kempenaar, Senior Planner

Pittsburgh District Pittsburgh, PA Notice No Closing Date: May 29, 2015

The following principles guide the development of goals and strategies to protect and promote these amenities:

The Illinois Department of Transportation and Lake County Division of Transportation. Route 173, including the Millburn Bypass

Chris James Park Planner July 16, Master Plan Kick Off Meeting

REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL

PURPOSE: The purpose is to provide commercial facilities in the Vancouver and Clark County vicinity.

SANTA CLARA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT CENTRAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT INTRODUCTION

DRAFT SCOPE FOR THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR HUDSON HIGHLANDS RESERVE TOWN OF PHILIPSTOWN, NEW YORK June 5, 2018

City of Orange Trails at Santiago Creek Specific Plan Recirculated Draft EIR Appendix C: Notice of Preparation (NOP) and Comment Letters

Objective: Resolution to recommend adoption of the Big Thompson Assessment to the Planning Commission

Master Plan Objectives and Policies

[FWS R8 R 2015 N087; FXRS282108E8PD0 156 F ] South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project, Phase 2; Don Edwards National Wildlife

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of June 16, 2018

San Diego River Coalition 2012 Work Plan

Galiuro Drilling EA Scenery Debby Kriegel 12/9/16

ALL SECURE SELF STORAGE SEPA APPEAL RECOMMENDATION TO THE HEARING EXAMINER

RD:VMT:JMD 10/14/2015 RESOLUTION NO.

THE LAND CONSERVANCY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

Center for Watershed Protection. Land Conservation <cwp.org/land_conservation.htm>

This page intentionally blank.

STEWARDSHIP OF LONG ISLAND SOUND S ECOLOGICAL AND RECREATIONAL RESOURCES

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

CONSENT CALENDAR CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM NO: A.1, A.2 STAFF: LARRY LARSEN

Green Infrastructure. NYS Department of Environmental Conservation

Shared History, Shared Future

SECTION 2.0 INTRODUCTION

Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Technical Study Update Community Outreach Meeting February 2017

PUBLIC HEARING. DRAFT Environmental Impact Statement. Matthews Memorial Baptist Church Washington, DC October 18, National Capital Region

The River Future. San Gabriel River Confluence with Cattle Canyon Creek Improvements Project (the Cattle Canyon Project)

3. VISION AND GOALS. Vision Statement. Goals, Objectives and Policies

PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO GREEN LINE MIXED USE SPECIFIC PLAN

Joe Pool Lake Lake Master Plan Public Information Meeting Presentation of Final Draft Revision July 31, 2018

RESOLUTION NO. R Refining the route, profile and stations for the Downtown Redmond Link Extension

Glenn Highway MP DSR. Landscape Narrative

BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) VERIFIED APPLICATION

1.0 Circulation Element

ROAD CLOSURE AND LAND USE AMENDMENT SILVER SPRINGS (WARD 1) NORTHEAST OF NOSEHILL DRIVE NW AND SILVER SPRINGS ROAD NW BYLAWS 2C2018 AND 29D2018

DOCKETED 09-RENEW EO-1

Historic Preservation Commission Motion No Certificate of Appropriateness

A REGIONAL HERITAGE STRATEGIC PLAN for OKANAGAN - SIMILKAMEEN

State Project No Heroes Tunnel

PARKS AND RECREATION

11: Good Design - Boor Site

Member Service Plan Sierra Nevada AmeriCorps Partnership

Urban Planning and Land Use

COMMISSION ACTION FORM

Planning for Staten. Habitat Restoration and Green Infrastructure. Island s North Shore

The Rocky Mountain Arsenal and the Northeast Greenway Corridor Project:

CITY OF LARKSPUR Staff Report. August 21, 2013 Council Meeting UPDATE ON TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY OF MARIN (TAM) GREENBRAE CORRIDOR WORKING GROUP

Support for Walnut Creek Watershed Council. Adopt resolution of support for the newly formed Walnut Creek Watershed Council.

TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (SCOTLAND) ACT 1997

AGENDA 07/14/11 PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting

Marion Street Green Infrastructure Project. Whittier Neighborhood Community Meeting April 18, 2018

Snohomish County Planning and Development Services

Pine Flat Lake Master Plan Update FACT SHEET September 2014

SCC PRD (2016) COUNTY PARK MASTER PLAN

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

PSRC REVIEW REPORT & CERTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION

An Introduction to the Far North Land Use Strategy

SALISBURY TOMORROW Our Vision

Planning & Zoning Commission Staff Report

DECLARATORY STATEMENT. THIS CAUSE came on for consideration upon the Petition for Declaratory

CASE NO. 99CW121 KEVIN M.

Transcription:

Save the Scenic Santa Ritas Gayle Hartmann, President 8987 E. Tanque Verde #309-157 Tucson, AZ 85749 520-445-6615 lisa@scenicsantaritas.org OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA Save the Scenic Santa Ritas Appellants No. 12-002 WQAB No. 12-003 WQAB No. 12-004-WQAB v. (Consolidated) DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, Respondent RESPONSE FROM SAVE THE SCENIC SANTA RITAS TO ROSEMONT COPPER COMPANY S MOTION TO DISMISS JOINDER TO APPEAL v. ROSEMONT COPPER COMPANY, Intervenor and Respondent

Under authority of A.A.C. R2-19-106(D), We, Save the Scenic Santa Ritas ( SSSR ), respond to Intervenor/Respondent Rosemont Copper Company s motion to dismiss our Joinder in the Notice of Appeal filed by Gregory C. and Carol A. Shinsky. ARGUMENT: 1. Save the Scenic Santa Ritas (SSSR) was formed in 1996 with a mission to protect the scenic, aesthetic, recreational, environmental and wildlife values of the Santa Rita Mountains, Patagonia Mountains, Canelo Hills and San Rafael Valley through education and outreach, including protection of these areas from degradation due to mining activities. We are especially concerned with protecting public lands within these areas and believe these lands have a much greater value to the region when preserved for the above-mentioned purposes rather than their mineral extraction value. We lead the public opposition to the proposed Rosemont mine, with endorsements from a large and diverse coalition of nearly 100 community groups, organizations and businesses, representing over 80,000 individuals living in the communities of Green Valley, Patagonia, Sahuarita, Sonoita, Tucson, Vail, as well as individuals visiting as tourists from other regions of the country and the world who enjoy this world-class birding and recreational area (see http://www.scenicsantaritas.org/about-us/endorsements). As a 501(c)3 organization, we regularly receive donations from many individuals who expect us, on their behalf, to continue our work to protect the Santa Rita Mountains and surrounding areas from the harmful impacts of mining. Rosemont claims there is not a reasonable probability that our organization and the various groups and individuals we represent will be affected by their action; however, it is completely incorrect to say that our organization and members would not be affected by this permit, and in

general, the proposed mine plan of operations. Rosemont s claim is incorrect for the following reasons: The mine plan of operations clearly states that it would use roughly 3,500 acres of public land (land that SSSR has been actively working to protect since 1996) within the Coronado National Forest (CNF) to construct part of the pit and the nine facilities the APP would regulate. Those acres and adjacent lands in the CNF are currently used by our members for various recreational purposes, including bicycling, hiking, camping, equestrian activities, picnicking, photography, birding, caving, hang gliding, rock hounding, wildlife study, ATV riding, amateur astronomy, botany, geocaching, orienteering, running and hunting. Many of our members have developed a deep appreciation for the spiritual value the area has to offer, and rely on the area as a component of their personal spiritual wellness. Our members depend on a fully functional ecosystem within which to live, work and recreate. The granting of this permit would lead to the impairment of this ecosystem, with immeasurable negative impacts to the economic, environmental and spiritual wellbeing of our members. If the APP is approved as written with no discharge limits set, contaminants could make their way into area ground water and downstream water resources for many months before a problem is identified and limits are set. The area that is down-gradient from the proposed site is not currently adequately defined and the facility composition itself has yet to be finalized. Analysis of potential extreme weather events suggests harmful contaminants could very well make their way into downstream water resources, the outer limit of which is also not defined. People and biological resources impacted would include those immediately down-gradient to the proposed facility, but also could have

impacts as far as Tucson and beyond. Many of our members reside, work and recreate in close proximity to the proposed facility as well as in the greater Tucson Basin, which in 2008 served approximately 744,000 people, and is projected to serve 990,000 people by 2030 (see Arizona Department of Commerce. 2009. Arizona population estimates, 2009). Most certainly, no matter how the area down-gradient of the proposed site is defined, contaminants could impact the very environments of the Santa Rita Mountains it is our mission to protect. Contamination would result in habitat loss for wildlife as well as an enormous and expensive cleanup effort to protect the greater Tucson area water supply. The APP concedes the likelihood of the open pit having a dewatering effect, noting that area springs will dry up, and SSSR members living in this area will likely need to increase the depth of their wells, and may eventually see their wells dry up completely. The dewatering effect will impact the entire Rosemont Valley and adjacent areas within the CNF, with a ripple effect on all of the people, land, air, wildlife and water SSSR is working to protect. Numerous endangered, threatened, candidate, and sensitive species would be negatively impacted by the proposed activities. Impacts to wildlife species would occur through habitat loss and potential direct mortality. Loss of biodiversity in the area will result in degraded scenic and ascetic experiences for our members who live, work and recreate in the area. Degradation from changes in groundwater discharges due to the issuance of this permit would have major socioeconomic impacts on our members in southern Arizona. As suggested by Dr. Tom Power (The Failure of the Rosemont Mine DEIS to Adequately Analyze the Socioeconomic Impacts of the Proposed Mine see http://www.scenicsantaritas.org/powercritiquefinal.pdf) the commercial development

of National Forest lands in a way that damaged the natural amenities those lands provided, could damage the local economy, leading to both lower levels of economic development and lower levels of economic well-being for residents. The bottom line: changes in groundwater discharges and dewatering in the area as a result of this permit would impact the landscape amenities of the Santa Ritas, one of the special places that makes Tucson and surrounding communities a great place to live and work. Loss of landscape amenities such as this would result in fewer of our members living, doing business, and recreating in the area, and in time, could offset much of, if not all of the alleged economic benefits the mine is purported to bring to the greater Tucson area. Groundwater discharges and dewatering as a result of this permit would negatively impact the Santa Rita Mountains. Our objective is to protect these mountains and the surrounding areas. The proposed mine, and the issuance of the APP, would result in a loss of biodiversity and degradation to scenic, aesthetic, spiritual, recreational, environmental and wildlife opportunities, which in time would most certainly negatively impact the socioeconomic and overall well-being of our members. To date we have submitted comments and testimony to various agencies during the public comment periods for each required permit. Specifically, we submitted comments on the proposed APP to ADEQ dated February 3, 2012. We have been engaged in the NEPA process with the CNF from the beginning, and submitted comments and testimony during scoping and on the draft environmental impact statement, draft Clean Water Act permit, Rosemont s application to Pima County for the Air Quality permit and the proposed permit for Rosemont s transmission line.

2. We have reviewed and agree with the arguments set forth in the Amended Notice of Appeal filed by Gregory C. and Carol A. Shinsky. Our interests and concerns are aligned with theirs. We believe that we should be allowed to join their appeal. 3. We request that approval of the APP be suspended until this appeal is resolved. 4. We request oral argument under A.A.C. R2-19-160(E). CONCLUSION AND RELIEF REQUESTED: We believe based on this long-standing involvement and the probability that we will be affected by the proposed action that our joinder is appropriate and proper. We RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT ROSEMONT COPPER COMPANY S MOTION TO DISMISS OUR JOINDER TO THE SHINKY S APPEAL BE DENIED. DATE: 6/25/2012 SIGNED: GAYLE HARTMANN President, Save the Scenic Santa Ritas

ORIGINAL of the foregoing was Electronically filed this 25 th day of June, 2012, with: Office of Administrative Hearings 1400 West Washington Street, Suite 101 http://portal.azoah.com/oedf/ Thomas Shedden Administrative Law Judge Office of Administrative Hearings 1400 West Washington Street, Suite 100 Toni Towne, Clerk Arizona Water Quality Appeals Board Management Services Division 100 N. 15 th Avenue, Suite 202 Email: Toni.towne@azdoa.gov Leslie Kyman Cooper Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General 1275 West Washington Street -2926 Email: Leslie.Cooper@azag.gov Attorney for ADEQ Lorena Ayala Office of Administrative Counsel Arizona Department of Environmental Quality 1110 West Washington Street Email: ayala.lorena@azdeq.gov Richard Mendolia Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Mining Unit, Groundwater Section 1110 West Washington Street Email: mendolia.richard@azdeq.gov

Christopher Munns Assistant Attorney General Solicitor General s Office 1275 West Washington Street Email: Christopher.Munns@azag.gov COPY of the foregoing emailed this 25 th day of June, 2012, to: Harlan C. Agnew Deputy County Attorney Pima County Attorney s Office 32 N. Stone Avenue Tucson, Arizona 85007 Email: Harlan.agnew@pcao.pima.gov Nan Stockholm Walden Richard S. Walden P.O. Box 7 Sahuarita, Arizona 85629 Email: nswalden@greenvalleypecan.com Email: rsw@greenvalleypecan.com Gregory C. and Carol A. Shinsky 15791 E. Hilton Ranch Road Vail, Arizona 85641 Email: gccats@gmail.com G. Van Velsor Wolf Jr. Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. 400 East Van Buren Street Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2202 Email: vwolf@swlaw.com Attorney for Appellants Norman D. James Todd C. Wiley Fennemore Craig, P.C. 3003 North Central Avenue Suite 2600 Phoenix, Arizona 85012-2913 Email: njames@fclaw.com Email: twiley@fclaw.com Attorneys for Intervenor-Respondent

COPY of the foregoing emailed or mailed this 25th day of June, 2012, to: Rosemont Copper Company P.O. Box 35130 Tucson, Arizona 85740 Rosemont Copper Company 4500 Cherry Creek South Drive Suite 10140 Denver, Colorado 80246 Sarah Barchas High Haven Ranch P.O. Box 246 Sonoita, Arizona 85637-0246 Melanie Emerson Sky Island Alliance 300 East University Boulevard, Suite 270 Tucson, Arizona 85705 emerson@skyislandalliance.org Arizona Mining Reform Coalition P.O. Box 43565 Tucson, Arizona 85733 roger@azminingreform.org Gayle Hartmann Save the Scenic Santa Ritas 8987 E. Tanque Verde, #309-157 Tucson, Arizona 85749 lisa@scenicsantaritas.org Josef E. Marlow Sonoran Institute 44 East Broadway Boulevard, Suite 350 Tucson, Arizona 85701 jmarlaow@sonoraninstitute.org Randy Serraglio Center for Biological Diversity P.O. Box 710 Tucson, Arizona 85702-0710 rserraglio@biologicaldiversity.org

Dino J. DeConcini 2335 E. Elm Street Tucson, Arizona 85719 dino@deconcini.us Elizabeth B. Murfee DeConcini 2335 E. Elm Street Tucson, Arizona 85719 beth@murfee.net Thomas F. Purdon 706 E. Bent Branch Place Green Valley, Arizona 85614 tfpurdon@cox.net Arnold B. Urken 1104 N. Rams Head Road Green Valley, Arizona 85614 arniebu@gmail.com Carolyn Campbell Coalition for Sonoran Desert Protection 300 East University Boulevard, Suite 120 Tucson, Arizona 85705 John M. Kozma 2468 East Overview Lane Green Valley, Arizona 85614-6245 James and Sherry Pepper P.O. Box 1326 Sonoita, Arizona 85637 David S. Steele 1661 N. Swan, Suite 116 Tucson, Arizona 85712 Steven Pawlowski Sierra Club Grand Canyon Chapter 202 East McDowell Road, Suite 277 Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4536 Stanley R. Hart 4671 East Madera Vista Road Green Valley, Arizona 85614