Experiences with different cherry rootstocks in Belgium. J. Vercammen Proeftuin pit- en steenfruit (pps)

Similar documents
High-density training systems

New training systems to improve the profitability of cherry orchards. Gérard Charlot, Ctifl (France)

Sweet Cherry Rootstock Traits Lynn E. Long, Oregon State University

dr. Nikita FAJT, Erika KOMEL COST FA1104-WG2/Trebinje, February, 2015

UPDATE ON CHERRY ROOTSTOCKS

Cherry COST Action FA 1104 Training school «Rootstocks and training systems» Cherry rootstocks. Sara Pinczon du Sel, La Tapy Gérard Charlot, Ctifl

Cherry rootstock on-going breeding program throughout the world

Small volume : Spanish bush, KGB, drilling

The influence of different cherry rootstocks on sweet cherry properties

The introduction of dwarfing cherry rootstocks, such as

Prof. Dr. Károly Hrotkó. SZIU Faculty of Horticultural Science

New Cherry Training Systems Show Promise Lynn E. Long, Extension Horticulturist Oregon State University Extension Service/Wasco County

Sweet cherry rootstocks

30 YEARS OF INTENSIVE ORCHARD PRODUCTION IN SOUTH TYROL. Extension Service for Fruit and Wine Growing, South Tyrol. Martin Thomann

WSHA 110th Annual Meeting and Trade Show December 2 nd, Cherry shows a great climate adaptability

3. M9 NIC29 A virus-free Belgian subclone of M9 that is slightly more vigorous than most others M9 clones.

Bob Spotts Kelly Wallis Delivered by Lynn Long

Sweet cherry production in Portugal. Berta Gonçalves

EVALUATION RESULTS OF FINNISH APPLE ROOTSTOCKS IN LATVIA

Peach Rootstock Trials Jim Schupp PSU-FREC

Small-Scale Cherry Production, Big Time Market Opportunities

Cherry Rootstocks & Scions for the M-F Area Lynn E. Long Oregon State University Extension

ISHS International Cherry Symposium 2013

Intensive Orchard Systems for High Quality, High Efficiency Sweet Cherry Production

Grower Summary TF 172. Evaluation and development of new rootstocks for apples, pears, cherries and plums. Final 2012

Sweet cherry rootstocks for Región of Murcia.

Growing for Your Market

Pruning and Training. Lynn E. Long Oregon State University Extension

Tree Fruit Horticural Research at Hudson Valley Research Laboratory

CHALLENGES FOR THE UK STONE FRUIT PRODUCTION

Evaluation of Pyrus and Quince Rootstocks for High Density Pear Orchards

CHERRY. training systems PNW 667. A Pacific Northwest Extension Publication. L. Long, G. Lang, S. Musacchi, M. Whiting

PRUNINGIAPPLE TREES. in eastern Canada CANADA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PUBLICATION C212 P c. 3

Avocado Tree Pruning in Chile

Growing Fruit: Grafting Fruit Trees in the Home Orchard

Growing Season Vigour Management

Effect of Rootstocks on Growth and Yield of Carmen Sweet Cherry

Comparison of Rootstocks Geneva 16, M9 and CG11 under organic cultivation at the LVWO Weinsberg B. Pfeiffer 1

Update on new cherry rootstock possibilities from Michigan State Univ. Amy Iezzoni Department of Horticulture Michigan State University

Optimizing Cherry Production: Physiology-Based Management. Gregory Lang Michigan State University

Developing and Optimizing Sweet Cherry Training Systems for Efficiency and High Quality Fruit Part 1. Gregory Lang Michigan State University

Evaluation and Demonstration of New Stone Fruit Systems

Preliminary results of propagation of several cherry rootstocks by green cuttings

Pruning Fruit Trees. Vince Urbina Colorado State Forest Service

Available online: Print ISSN X; Electronic

PRUNING OF MUSCADINES. Dr. Patrick Conner University of Georgia Tifton Campus

ACHIEVEMENTS IN HIGH DENSITY CHERRY ORCHARD SYSTEMS IN HUNGARY

Pear Rootstocks. How many trees would I plant? ± 3,000 per ha. What I believe growers need to be doing to be successful in the Year 2012.

Orchard Density and Canopy Design. Prepared by Ross Wilson AgFirst NZ

Integration of Tree Spacing, Pruning and Rootstock Selection for Efficient Almond Production

EVALUATION OF SIZE CONTROLLING ROOTSTOCKS FOR CALIFORNIA PEACH, PLUM AND NECTARINE PRODUCTION

Canopy Management Strategies

Apple Rootstocks. John Cline, University of Guelph, Horticultural Experiment Station, Simcoe

PRUNING LANDSCAPE TREES. By Larry Figart, Urban Forestry Extension Agent Duval County Extension Service

Grafting and Budding Nursery Crop Plants AG-396. Grafting

Pruning and Training Fruit Trees

FUTURE ORCHARDS Crop Loading. Prepared by: John Wilton and Ross Wilson AGFIRST Nov 2007

Experiences with Imposing Orchard-Level Climate Change via Covering Systems

Training and Pruning Almond Trees

Floral Notes. By . In This Issue. A Publication of the UMass Extension Floriculture Program

Grafting Fruit Trees. Loyd Collett 4/5/2011 1

Quantifying Limitations to Balanced Cropping

Pruning and Training Deciduous Fruit Trees for the Dooryard 1

USE OF THE ETIOLATION TECHNIQUE IN ROOTING AVOCADO CUTTINGS

TRAINING AND PRUNING FRUIT PLANTS. Elizabeth Wahle (with contributions from Sonja Lallemand) February 2015 GROWING A NEW GENERATION

High density planting

Modern Apple Training Systems. Terence L. Robinson Dept. of Horticultural Sciences, Cornell University Geneva, NY 14456

Inovace studijních programů AF a ZF MENDELU směřující k vytvoření mezioborové integrace CZ.1.07/2.2.00/

High density planting systems: principles and pitfalls John Palmer HortResearch, Nelson Research Centre, Motueka, NZ

GROWTH AND PERFORMANCE OF OWN-ROOTED CHANDLER AND VINA COMPARED TO PARADOX ROOTED TREES

Rootstocks. Rootstocks for intensive pear production. Pear (Pyrus) rootstocks. OHF series

Principles Involved in Tree Management of Higher Density Avocado Orchards

Management strategies for fertigation of sweet cherry

PRINCIPLES OF PRUNING AND TRAINING G. A. Cahoon and R. G. Hill, Jr Department of Horticulture Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center

Propagation techniques in horticulture

Nursery Tree Specifications & Tree Types Description

Training and Pruning Florida Peaches, Nectarines, and Plums 1

Responses of Primocane Blackberries to Varying Mow-down and Tipping Regimes. Mark Gaskell, Farm Advisor San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara Counties

The Sun-Blotch Disease of Avocado

Varieties - The recent Queensland experience Chris Searle Technical Advisor Grower Services Suncoast Gold Macadamias

AVOCADO ROOTSTOCK-SCION RELATIONSHIPS: A LONG-TERM, LARGE-SCALE FIELD RESEARCH PROJECT. II. DATA COLLECTED FROM FRUIT-BEARING ORCHARDS 1

Training and Pruning Florida Peaches, Nectarines, and Plums 1

Training and Pruning Florida Peaches, Nectarines, and Plums 1

Sweet Cherry Crossing Techniques

Initial growth and fruiting of Summit sweet cherry (Prunus avium) on five rootstocks

The Italian Plum Rootstock Trial: Results for Sicilian Environmental Conditions

Home Orchard Care for Master Gardeners. Jeff Schalau Associate Agent, ANR University of Arizona Cooperative Extension, Yavapai County

ANNUAL REPORT TO NC DWARF APPLE ROOTSTOCK TRIAL SUMMARY FOR THE 2010 SEASON

TRANSMISSION OF ROSE MOSAIC VIRUSES

Unit E: Urban Forestry. Lesson 4: Pruning Trees in Urban Settings

California Cling Peach Board ANNUAL REPORT-2010 IMPROVED ROOTSTOCKS FOR PEACH AND NECTARINE. Ted DeJong, Professor, University of California, Davis.

Apple Rootstock Trials in British Columbia, Canada

Why Grow Fruit or Berries in Your Backyard?

East Malling Rootstock Club Policy Group meeting 15th September 2017

extension.missouri.edu Archive version -- See MU Guide Grafting What is grafting? Why graft? What are the limitations? What can be grafted?

GRAFTING AND BUDDING TECHNIQUES FOR APPLE. PlSc 300 LAB 8

Getting New Orchard Plantings to Perform

MU Guide. Home Fruit Production: Grape Training Systems

Training & Pruning Fruit Trees AG-29

Behavior in the nursery of some new cherry tree varieties in the conditions from Dobrogea

Transcription:

Experiences with different cherry rootstocks in Belgium J. Vercammen Proeftuin pit- en steenfruit (pps)

Cherry rootstocks Introduction Comparison Gisela 5 Gisela 3 Comparison Gisela 5 Gisela 6 Comparison Gisela 5 PiKu 4.20 Rootstock trial Lapins Comparison Gisela 5 Krymsk 5 Rootstock trial Kordia/Summit Rootstock trial Regina

Aim We want to obtain trees which yield precociously and which have a reduced height harvest of all of the cherries when standing on the ground

Sweet cherries in Belgium New start in the early nineties New varieties Weak growing rootstock : Gisela 5 New training and pruning methods

Demands Compatibility Soil Climate Health = Virus status Vigour Production Fruit size

Gisela 5 (Gisela 148/2) Prunus cerasus x Prunus canescens Moderate to weak vigour Yield efficiency is very high Sometimes small fruit size Suitable for most modern varieties Planting distance : 5 x 3 m to 4 x 2 m Tree height : 3 to 4 m Best suited for intensive cherry culture

Rootstock trial Regina and Karina Gisela 5 Gisela 3

Root stock trial Regina - Karina Planting year : March 2005 Varieties : Regina and Karina Rootstocks : Gisela 3 and Gisela 5 Planting distance : 4 x 2 m With plastic covering With irrigation

Rootstock trial Regina - Karina Increase trunk circumference (2005-2014) 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 cm Gisela 5 Gisela 3 Gisela 5 Gisela 3 Regina Karina Planting year : 2004-2005 Planting distance : 4.0 x 2.0 m

Rootstock trial Regina - Karina Average shootlength 2006-2014 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 cm Gisela 5 Gisela 3 Gisela 5 Gisela 3 Planting year : 2004-2005 Planting distance : 4.0 x 2.0 m

Rootstock trial Regina - Karina Yield data (2007-2014) 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Kg/tree Gisela 5 Gisela 3 Gisela 5 Gisela 3 g 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 Regina Kg/tree Fruit weight (g) Karina Planting year : 2004-2005 Planting distance : 4.0 x 2.0 m

Gisela 3 (Gisela 209/1) Prunus cerasus x Prunus canescens Weak vigour High yield efficiency Often smaller fruit size Suitable for most modern varieties Planting distance : 4 x 2 m to 3.5 x 1.5 m Tree height : 3 to 4 m Very suitable for intensive cherry culture

Conclusion for Gisela 3 20 to 33 % less vigour as Gisela 5 Yield is good Good fruit size, sometimes slightly smaller Shorter planting distance required Suitable for intensive cherry culture

Rootstock trial with Samba Gisela 5 Gisela 6

Rootstock trial Samba Planting year : 2007-2008 Variety : Samba Rootstocks : Gisela 5 and Gisela 6 Planting distance : 5 x 2 m No plastic covering With irrigation

Rootstock trial Samba Increase trunk circumference (2008-2014) 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 cm Gisela 5 Gisela 6 Planting year : 2007-2008 Planting distance : 5.0 x 2.0 m

Rootstock trial Samba Shootlength 2014 Rootstock Shootlength (cm) Number of shoots Total shootlength (m) Gisela 5 24.3 33 8.1 Gisela 6 30.4 33 10.0 Planting year : 2007-2008 Planting distance : 5.0 x 2.0 m

Rootstock trial Samba Tree volume 2014 10 11 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 m³ Gisela 5 Gisela 6 Planting year : 2007-2008 Planting distance : 5.0 x 2.0 m

Rootstock trial Samba Yield data (2009-2014) 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Kg/tree Planting year : 2007-2008 Gisela 5 Gisela 6 Kg/tree Fruit weight (g) 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 Planting distance : 5.0 x 2.0 m g

Gisela 6 (Gisela 148/1) Prunus cerasus x Prunus canescens Moderate vigour High yield efficiency Recommended for selffertile varieties Not suitable for all varieties Planting distance : 5 x 3 m to 4 x 2 m Tree height : 4 à 5 m Less suitable for intensive cherry culture

Conclusion for Gisela 6 15-20 % more vigour as Gisela 5 Production is slightly higher Fruit size can be smaller Wider spacing required Suitable for lighter soils Suitable for selffertile varieties??? Support material is necessary

Kordia Gisela 5 Gisela 6

Rootstock trial with Satin Gisela 5 PiKu 4.20

Rootstock trial Satin Variety : Satin Planting year : 2006-2007 Rootstock : Gisela 5 and PiKu 4.20 (= PiKu 1) Planting distance : 5,0 x 2,5 m No plastic covering With irrigation

Rootstock trial Satin Increase trunk circumference (2007-2013) 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 cm Gisela 5 PiKu 4.20 Planting year : 2006-2007 Planting distance : 5.0 x 2.5 m

Rootstock trial Satin Shootlength 2013 Rootstock Shootlength (cm) Number of shoots Total shootlength (m) Gisela 5 67.6 179 120.7 PiKu 4.20 75.3 135 101.6 Planting year : 2006-2007 Planting distance : 5.0 x 2.5 m

Rootstock trial Satin Tree volume 2013 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 m³ Gisela 5 PiKu 4.20 Planting year : 2006-2007 Planting distance : 5.0 x 2.5 m

Rootstock trial Satin 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Yield data (2009-2013) Kg/tree Planting year : 2006-2007 Gisela 5 PiKu 4.20 Kg/tree Fruit weight (g) Planting distance : 5.0 x 2.5 m g 14 11 12 13 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3

Hertford on PiKu 1 50 % healthy trees and 50 % weak trees

PiKu 4.20 (PiKu 1) Prunus avium x (P. canescens x P. tomentosa) Dresden-Pillnitz (D) Moderate vigour Poor soil : too weak and too small fruit size Planting distance : 5 x 3 m to 4 x 2 m Tree height : 4 à 5 m Less suitable for intensive cherry culture

Conclusion for PiKu 4.20 10 % weaker vigour as Gisela 5 In older trials stronger vigour Previous results are not confirmed Production is lower Fruit size is smaller Wider spacing required No recommendation

Kordia Gisela 5 PiKu 4.20

Rootstock trial with Lapins Gisela 5 Gisela 3 Gisela 6 PiKu 4.20

Rootstock trial Lapins Variety : Lapins Planting year : 2009-2010 Rootstock + Planting distance : PiKu 4.20 (= PiKu 1) : 4.0 x 2.5 m (900 trees/ha) Gisela 6 : 4.0 x 2.5 m (900 trees/ha) Gisela 5 : 4.0 x 2.0 m (1.125 trees/ha) Gisela 3 : 4.0 x 1.5 m (1.500 trees/ha) No plastic covering - With irrigation (since 2014)

Rootstock trial Lapins Increase trunk circumference (2010-2014) 25 cm 20 15 10 5 0 PiKu 4.20 Gisela 6 Gisela 5 Gisela 3 Planting year : 2009-2010 Planting distance : 4.0 x

Rootstock trial Lapins Shootlength 2014 Rootstock Shootlength (cm) Number of shoots Total shootlength (m) PiKu 4.20 40.9 23 9.2 Gisela 6 39.1 30 11.6 Gisela 5 28.6 25 7.0 Gisela 3 27.1 15 4.1 Planting year : 2009-2010 Planting distance : 4.0 x

Rootstock trial Lapins Tree volume 2014 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 m³ PiKu 4.20 Gisela 6 Gisela 5 Gisela 3 Planting year : 2009-2010 Planting distance : 4.0 x

Rootstock trial Lapins Yield data (2011-2014) 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Kg/tree PiKu 4.20 Gisela 6 Gisela 5 Gisela 3 Kg/tree Fruit weight (g) Planting year : 2009-2010 Planting distance : 4.0 x g 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4

Rootstock trial Lapins Yield data (2011-2014) 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Ton/ha PiKu 4.20 Gisela 6 Gisela 5 Gisela 3 Ton/ha Fruit weight (g) g 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 Planting year : 2009-2010 Planting distance : 4.0 x

Rootstock trial with Regina Gisela 5 Krymsk 5

Rootstock trial Regina Variety : Regina Planting year : 2010-2011 Rootstock : Gisela 5 Krymsk 5 Planting distance : 4.0 x 2.0 m No plastic covering With irrigation (since 2014)

Rootstock trial Regina Increase trunk circumference 2011-2014 Rootstock Increase trunk circumference 2014 Increase trunk circumference Total % to Gisela 5 (cm) (cm) Gisela 5 4.5 11.3 100 Krymsk 5 6.3 15.4 135 Planting year : 2010-2011 Planting distance : 4.0 x 2.0 m

Rootstock trial Regina Shootlength 2013 Rootstock Shootlength (cm) Number of shoots Total shootlength (m) Gisela 5 56.2 25 14.1 Krymsk 5 79.3 34 27.2 Planting year : 2010-2011 Planting distance : 4.0 x 2.0 m

Rootstock trial Regina Tree volume 2014 5 m³ 4 3 2 1 0 Gisela 5 Krymsk 5 Planting year : 2010-2011 Planting distance : 4.0 x 2.0 m

Rootstock trial Regina Gisela 5 Krymsk 5

Rootstock trial Regina Yield data 2013-2014 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Kg/tree Gisela 5 Krymsk 5 Kg/tree Fruit weigth (g) g 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 Planting year : 2010-2011 Planting distance : 4.0 x 2.0 m

Rootstock trial Kordia and Summit Gisela 5 Gisela 3 Gisela 12 Gisela 13 (148/13) Weiroot 720

Rootstock trial Kordia and Summit Variety : Kordia and Summit Planting year : 2012-2013 Rootstocks : Gisela 3, Gisela 5, Gisela 12, Gisela 13 (148/13) and Weiroot 720 Planting distance : 4.0 x 2.0 (1.125 trees ha) No plastic covering With irrigation (since 2014)

Rootstock trial Kordia and Summit Increase trunk circumference (2013-2014) cm 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Gisela 3 Gisela 5 Gisela 12 Gisela 13 Weiroot 720 Kordia Summit Planting year : 2012-2013 Planting distance : 4.0 x 2.0 m

Rootstock trial Kordia and Summit Tree volume 2014 2.00 1.75 1.50 1.25 1.00 0.75 0.50 0.25 0.00 m³ Gisela 3 Gisela 5 Gisela 12 Gisela 13 Weiroot 720 Kordia Summit Planting year : 2012-2013 Planting distance : 4.0 x 2.0 m

Rootstock trial with Regina Gisela 5 WeiGi 1 WeiGi 2

Rootstock trial Regina Variety : Regina Planting year : 2013-2014 Rootstocks : Gisela 5, WeiGi 1 and WeiGi 2 Planting distance : 4.0 x 2.0 (1.125 trees ha) No plastic covering With irrigation

Rootstock trial Regina Increase trunk circumference 2014 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 cm Gisela 5 Weigi 1 Weigi 2 Planting year : 2013-2014 Planting distance : 4.0 x 2.0 m

Conclusion rootstocks Gisela 3 Gisela 5 Gisela 6 PiKu 4.20 Vigour 75-80 % 100 % 90-115 % 90 % Production Good Good Very good Moderate Fruit size Moderate Good Moderate Moderate Tree Light green leaves Healthy Healthy? Gisela 5 remains our advice!!!

General conclusion for Gisela 5 Moderate to weak vigour Yield efficiency is very high Very good fruit size in dry circumstances sometimes too small solved quite easily by irrigation Suitable for most modern varieties Best suited for intensive cherry culture

Thank you for your attention! Sweetheart on Gisela 5 in a V-system