Foreword. Foreword. Sincerely, The Damascus Design Workshop: A Regional Model for a Clean, Green, Affordable and Fair UGB Expansion

Similar documents
The Damascus Area Design Workshop A Regional Model for a Clean, Green, Affordable and Fair UGB Expansion

Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan. Chapter 4: LAND USE

Portland was a beautiful city, but in the 1960s and 1970s, its population grew very fast.

Goal 14 Urbanization

Clackamas County Responses to Questions from Stafford Hamlet Stafford Hamlet Community Meeting March 13, 2017, 7-8 p.m., Stafford Elementary School

MEETING PURPOSE AND OVERVIEW

Section 4 BUILDING THE MASTER PLAN

Municipal Plan*Assessment

Living in Albemarle County s Urban Places

Glenborough at Easton Land Use Master Plan

Making the Land Use, Transportation, Air Quality Connection

CITY OF TIGARD EXPECTED SERVICE AREA

SUNSET CORRIDOR LAND. The property is now available and ready for corporate utilization, development or investment.

Ridgefield and the Growth Management Act

Achieving Regional Metropolitan Area Nature Conservation: Ingredients for Success

Westbound: A One-day Exploration of Growth

Telling the Oregon Story

COLVER ROAD INDUSTRIAL CONCEPT PLAN

Anchorage Citizens Coalition Title 21, Module 2. Questions (third set, as of 4/11/04)

Making the Land Use Light Rail Connection. Andy Cotugno Metro Rail~Volution 2010

DRAFT Amsterdam/Churchill Community Plan (4/17/08) Adopted By the Gallatin County Commission

Rural Land Use Designations Kittitas County December 6, 2007 Draft

4-Town Comprehensive Plan DRAFT 7/30/07

A citizen s guide to the. Comprehensive Plan. City of Lakeville, Minnesota 1

ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD

From Growth Controls, to Comprehensive Planning, to Smart Growth: Planning s Emerging Fourth Wave

Land Use Planning in the United States and in Oregon

greenprint midtown SUSTAINABILITY ACTION PLAN 2012

Additional information about land use types is given in Chapter 5. Design guidelines for Centers and Neighborhoods are given in Chapter 7.

Ch. 13 Urbanization. Global urbanizing trends 2/9/2016. Our urbanizing world. Central Case: Managing growth in Portland, Oregon

Jeff Brasel, Senior Planner, Community Planning and Development Analiese Hock, Senior Planner, Community Planning and Development

Creating Complete Roadway Corridors:

STUDY OF URBAN SMART GROWTH APPROACH BASED ON THE PRINCIPLES AND GUIDELINES FOR NEW PLANNING

Remi Mendoza City Planning Academy March 13, 2017

Chapter 1 Vision Statement & Goals

2015 Livable Lents Community Survey

South Meridian. Vision. Action

Transit-Oriented Development

Group Executive Liveability and Natural Assets

Arlington, Virginia is a worldclass

PSRC REVIEW REPORT & CERTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION

Preparing to Review City-owned Property

ATTACHMENT A Update 04/01/19 Department of Transportation & Development Long-Range Planning Work Program - Input Received from Outreach

Access Management: An Overview

TOD 101 CREATING LIVABLE COMMUNITIES WITH TRANSIT

VILLAGE OF CLEMMONS PLANNING BOARD DRAFT STAFF REPORT

Key Concepts of the General Plan

hermitage town center

INTRODUCTION PLANNING HISTORY

CHAPTER 4 FUTURE LAND USE AND URBAN SERVICES DISTRICTS

Land Use Amendment in Southwood (Ward 11) at and Elbow Drive SW, LOC

STAFF SUMMARY FOR S17-02 SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION

REVISED FINDINGS FOR CLACKAMAS COUNTY URBAN AND RURAL RESERVES APRIL 21, 2011

APPENDIX 1 - STEERING COMMITTEE ISSUES RESPONSE SUMMARY (WORKSHOP N'p. 1)

S A C R A M E N T O C O U N T Y JACKSON HIGHWAY & GRANT LINE EAST VISIONING STUDY

The Urban Environment: Creating Livable and Sustainable Cities

Wasatch CHOICE for 2040

1 October Dear Citizens of Charlotte and Mecklenburg County,

CHAPTER 7: VISION AND ACTION STATEMENTS. Noble 2025 Vision Statement

City Center Neighborhood Plan

K. SMART ASSOCIATES LIMITED

Mary Norwood. Mayoral Forum on Greenspace Responses

Location. Need GOAL 14 URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY. Urban Planning in Oregon 7/8/2015

CLACKAMAS COUNTY ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE

Joint Public Hearing. Preliminary Subregion 5 Master Plan and Proposed Sectional Map Amendment

Easton. Smart Growth Through Innovation. Easton

Vancouver Towers + Podiums. West End to Abu Dhabi

Glenborough at Easton Land Use Master Plan

2018 Northampton Township Comprehensive Plan

Arkansas River Corridor

2019 Legislative Priorities

Realities and Assets in an In-Town Shopping Center

Outlawing Sprawl. Pennsylvania Chapter American Planning Association October 6, 2009

Sprawling urban development and auto-dominated streets

Calvert County Comprehensive Plan

Page 1 of 5. Jesse Arreguín City Councilmember, District 4 CONSENT CALENDAR November 29, 2016

Sustainably Repositioning Greyfield Sites. Greyfield Sites Anywhere

participant feedback summary

10/19/2016. Chapter 22 Lecture Outline Urbanization. Urbanization and Sustainable Cities. Outline

A. Selma Park, Davis Bay and Wilson Creek

OVERVIEW OF PLANS FOR THE JEFFERSON COUNTY COUNTRYSIDE FARM In the Context of Quality Place Characteristics

Re: Hazeldean Road - Minto Potters Key Subdivision Responses to Resident Concerns

Recognizing Agenda 21/Sustainable Development

Silverdale Regional Center

2015 Request for Proposals Session Guidelines

CHAPTER 12 IMPLEMENTATION

Washington State s Growth Management Act

Ten Mile Creek Planning Area

City of Heath. Town Center Concept

Regional Context Statement

Chapter 4. Linking Land Use with Transportation. Chapter 4

jnb2 design studio market rendering Architect Colorado 10

Glenborough at Easton Land Use Master Plan

Land Use & Transportation Primer

Green Infrastructure Policies and Ordinances

FINAL MITIGATION PLAN to address

Subject: City of Richfield Cedar Avenue Corridor Plan Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Review File No

Final Master Plan and Development Control Regulations

NEW YORK AND CONNECTICUT SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES. Fair Housing & Equity Assessment & Regional Planning Enhancement

DRAFT IMPACCT BROOKLYN VISIONING SESSION WITH MYRTLE VILLAGE GREEN SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SUNDAY OCTOBER 2, MYRTLE AVE, BROOKLYN NY

Transcription:

Foreword Foreword We are pleased to present this summary report of the results of the Damascus Community Design Workshop. This project represents a new effort by 1000 Friends of Oregon and the Coalition for a Livable Future, the project sponsors; to translate our values and principles into a positive alternative for the region s urban development. The results of the project is a design model that illustrates urban development that uses land efficiently, protects our natural resources and fish and wildlife habitat, provides for a fair share of the region s jobs, and includes a full range of choices in types of housing and transportation, that meet the needs of families of all incomes and types. Although we focused our project on the likeliest area for urban expansion, we believe our ideas, principles and design insights will be relevant no matter where or when the urban growth boundary is expanded. We hope this design inspires a regional discussion that focuses on the quality of urban development and not just the quantity, and we look forward to your contributions to that regional discussion. Sincerely, Robert Liberty Jill Fuglister The Damascus Design Workshop: A Regional Model for a Clean, Green, Affordable and Fair UGB Expansion i

Thank You The Project Sponsors wish to extend our deep appreciation and thanks to our grantors for their valued support, without which this project would not have been possible. The David and Lucile Packard Foundation The Meyer Memorial Trust We also extend our thanks to the many who have contributed to this project, and have given generously of their time, money, and/or materials towards its success. St. Paul of Damascus Lutheran Church Deep Creek Elementary School Holt and Haugh Inc. Edis Jurcys, Photography Metro Council, Mapping Arts Action Alliance of Clackamas County Diana Lobo Amitai Siegel Renee Ugrin, Damascus Middle School Higgins Restaurant and Bar Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, Printing American Institute of Architects, Oregon Chapter Stan Schwartz, Catering New Seasons Market The Damascus Design Workshop: A Regional Model for a Clean, Green, Affordable and Fair UGB Expansion ii

On the cover: Aerial perspective view of a characteristic neighborhood, showing mixed-use high density buildings at the top, residential streets including many housing options in the center, and green infrastructure (in the form of parks, green streets, and natural areas) brought deep into the neighborhood from below. Drawing by Stacy Moriarty, Moriarty Condon Ltd. The Damascus Design Workshop: A Regional Model for a Clean, Green, Affordable and Fair UGB Expansion iii

Table of Contents Contents Foreword i 2 Design Brief 8 Green Team 11 Go Team 19 Home Team 30 Conclusion 46 Appendices 51 The Damascus Design Workshop: A Regional Model for a Clean, Green, Affordable and Fair UGB Expansion 1

Metro Must Decide Where and How Much to Expand the UGB. Damascus is the Most Likely Candidate Area The Portland metropolitan area regional planning authority (Metro) is considering a substantial expansion of the Portland area urban growth boundary (UGB) 1. Metro must make this decision to comply with a law passed by the Oregon Legislature in 1995. This law requires Metro to ensure enough land inside the UGB such that there is a twenty-year supply of land available for development. Metro is similarly obligated to consider lands called exception lands first, before allowing urbanization of productive farm or forestlands. Exception lands were identified in 1974 when the Oregon Senate passed Bill 100, the legislation that created Oregon s land use planning program. The lands identified were not easily classified as farm, forest, or urban land, and thus were considered exception lands. By far the largest single area of exception lands are in the 25 square miles immediately southeast of the Portland UGB lands within Pleasant Valley and Sunshine Valley that converge at the village of Damascus. If the UGB expands in this area and present policies for urbanization are applied, these valley landscapes will be dramatically altered. One hopes they will be altered for the better, but recent experience leaves many in doubt. Thirty-eight people who had never worked with each other before, and who had no direct responsibility for this momentous decision, came together to answer one overarching question: If the Damascus area was included within the UGB and The Damascus Design Workshop: A Regional Model for a Clean, Green, Affordable and Fair UGB Expansion 2

The Study Area in the Portland metropolitan region. The Damascus Design Workshop: A Regional Model for a Clean, Green, Affordable and Fair UGB Expansion 3

The Study Site in the Damascus Region. Map is from Metro Council and shows resource lands, lands subject to consideration for UGB expansion but with various levels of importance as resource lands, mostly for farming and forestry. The green color parcels in the study ( in the tier three resource lands category) site are considered to be the highest value for farming. The Damascus Design Workshop: A Regional Model for a Clean, Green, Affordable and Fair UGB Expansion 4

subsequently urbanized, could it become a better place in the process? Their responses and ideas are captured in this report. All of the plans shown in this report were produced in the six days between May 29 and June 3, 2002. Participants came from many places and from many walks of life. Many participants, including the project sponsors, are concerned about the proposed UGB expansion. Many have fought against expansion in the past, and greet the prospect of an expansion many times larger than those of the past with grave misgivings. Their experience has shown them, over and over again, that opening new land to urbanization inevitably leads to sprawling development, unaffordable housing, traffic congestion, a proliferation of strip malls, and natural resource destruction, producing a world of land use and infrastructure instead of a community to belong to. So it was that this group assembled to suggest another way. They began by asking: If the UGB does expand in the Damascus area, is there any way to avoid this all too familiar outcome? Is there a way to create a real community, a place to belong to, with decent homes for people of all incomes, with adequate family wage jobs nearby, where you can get around without a car if you choose, where you can readily access healthful, locally grown food, and where nature is a part of your everyday experience? The Damascus Design Workshop: A Regional Model for a Clean, Green, Affordable and Fair UGB Expansion 5

The answer arrived at after six exhausting days is a qualified yes. Yes it is possible to have such a place, but only if the community grows from the valuable features that are there, and not bury them under a proliferation of homogenous subdivisions. Yes, it is possible to have such a place, but only by insisting on a network of streets, paths and riparian areas that unite the community, not impenetrable barriers that divide it. Yes, it is possible, but only if the people who serve your coffee at your local café, patrol your street, and teach your kids to read can live nearby, not forced to live in far off districts because they cannot afford to live in yours. Yes, it is possible, but only if important natural features are preserved and cherished, not buried under concrete or locked behind a fence. Yes, it is possible, but only by creating and preserving land for growing food. Yes, it is possible, but only if family wage jobs are integrated into the fabric of the community and not isolated to areas beyond transit lines or located a frustrating hour s drive away. If all of these conditions can be met, then the urbanization of this beautiful pair of valleys might constitute an upward trade: the emergence of a fair, green, and affordable community as equitable compensation for the loss of open fields and rural residential parcels. If, however, a business as usual approach is maintained, where UGB expansion is followed by the all too familiar process of dividing up the landscape like so many cuts of beef, to be sold by the pound, then no such consensus would exist. Workshop participants would likely advise against expanding the UGB in the Damascus area. The Damascus Design Workshop: A Regional Model for a Clean, Green, Affordable and Fair UGB Expansion 6

At the same time, should Metro propose expansion into any other candidate landscape, workshop participants most probably could not accept there that which they could not condone for Damascus. Wherever the UGB expands, the expansion should only be allowed if there are sufficient assurances that whatever is built will conform to publicly approved policies for green, fair, and affordable communities. In the pages that follow is a collective vision for just such a community. The Damascus Design Workshop: A Regional Model for a Clean, Green, Affordable and Fair UGB Expansion 7