San Joaquin River Restoration Program Mendota Pool Bypass and Reach 2B Improvements Project. Restoration Goal Technical Feedback Group

Similar documents
Update on the Bayfront Canal Bypass Project. Recommendation This an informational item only. No City Council action is required at this time.

FISH RESTORATION PROGRAM AGREEMENT Implementing Habitat Restoration Requirements Of The Biological Opinions

North Branch of Cypress Creek Ecological Restoration: A Comprehensive Approach to Stream Restoration

Once Upon a Gravel Pit: Reconnecting Floodplain through Aggregate Extraction

MPDP VEGETATION ADVISORY WORKGROUP WORKSHOP #1

Pine Flat Lake Master Plan Update FACT SHEET September 2014

HISTORICAL ECOLOGY OF THE DELTA Emerging Concepts about a Spatially Complex and Temporally Dynamic System

Regional Restoration Planning:

The Napa River Flood Protection Project

Kootenai River Habitat Restoration Program June 18, 2018 Kootenai Valley Resource Initiative Update

Construction Progress Report

Peoria Riverfront Development (Ecosystem Restoration) Upper Mid-sized Island Critical Restoration Project (September 2011)

C. WATER. 1. Surface Water Runoff. See Section C.3, Flood Hazard/Mudflow Hazard, page Ground Water

Fisher Slough Tidal Marsh Restoration Project Scaling Down the Restoration Planning & Analysis Framework to Evaluate Project Alternatives

Working with Partners to Manage Recreation Sites. Dave Samson California Department of Water Resources

APPENDIX C NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN: ACTIONS AND PRIORITIES

One River Environmental Assessment. Welcome!

Public Meeting for the Redevelopment of. July 17,2018 7pm to 9pm Rolling Knolls Elementary School

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN

Corridor Management Committee. September 29, 2017

CHAPTER 2 SUMMARY 1. PROJECT SUMMARY DATA

TOWN OF BETHLEHEM OPEN SPACE CONSERVATION PLAN PUBLIC MEETING: OCTOBER 12, 2017

South Bismarck Watershed Model Update and Stormwater Improvement Project

STAFFORD TRACT NORTH OF US90A 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 OBJECTIVE

Town of Lyons Parks Flood Recovery Planning Process. Photograph courtesy of Ed Bruder

Rainwater Harvesting: Where does the Rainfall Go?

STREAM BANK STABILIZATION THORPS MORTIMER RECREATION AREA Grandfather Ranger District SITE LOCATION & DRAINAGE AREA

NOTICE OF PREPARATION

Public Information Meeting on Aquatic Plant Management: Lakes Mendota, Monona, Wingra, Waubesa, and Kegonsa. October 2 and 9, :00-8:30 p.m.

GREATER DES MOINES WATER TRAILS AND GREENWAYS PLAN

April 11, 2016 Park Board Chair and Commissioners General Manager Vancouver Board of Parks and Recreation New Brighton Salt Marsh - Preferred Concept

VILLAGE OF BOLTON HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN

The Trinity River Corridor Project Update

Draft Rhode Island Stormwater Design and Installation Standards Manual

Regional Context Statement

WET PONDS INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE CHECKLIST

Improving Communities Through the Arroyo Seco Sustainability Campaign and Watershed Assessment

Lower Meramec Multi-Jurisdictional Floodplain Management Plan Public Involvement (Results of Early Public Engagement) 27 June 2018

BRADENTON RIVERWALK EXPANSION MASTER PLAN

Table of Contents G.1.a Water Resources - Surface Water - Drainage

From: Sent: To: Cc: Harmon, Dan; Erik Dickson RE: South Avenue Bridge Project, Missoula County // Request for comment

HIGH-SPEED RAIL PROGRAM UPDATE. Gilroy Unified School District & Gilroy City Council September 24, 2018 Gilroy City Council Chambers, Gilroy, CA

Public Review Draft Oceanside Subarea Habitat Conservation Plan/ Natural Communities Conservation Plan

WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON

Arkansas River Corridor

SECTION 4(f) DE MINIMIS DOCUMENTATION

I. INTRODUCTION. identify long-term capital improvements and rehabilitation measures for the existing drainage system;

City Council Special Meeting AGENDA ITEM NO. C.

Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE

Ashbridges Bay Erosion and Sediment Control Project

Is a Riparian Restoration Still Viable After 100-year Storm Events Alter the Original Design?

Bassett Creek Valley Working Group. October 4, 2017

RIVER RECREATION AND CONSERVATION: LESSONS FROM COLORADO S 2013 FLOODS

Summary of Changes in the DRAFT Rivers Project Natural Resource Master Plan from the 2001 approved plan to 2014 plan

SOUTHERN GRAMPIANS WETLANDS INFORMATION DAY Sunday 23 rd November 2014

Humber Bay Shores Precinct Plan Final Report

Vaughan Metropolitan Centre (VMC) Black Creek Renewal CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

Remi Mendoza City Planning Academy March 13, 2017

COLLIER BOULEVARD (CR 951) CORRIDOR

4/8/2015 Item #10D Page 1

WORK SESSION ITEM City Council

Joe Pool Lake Lake Master Plan Public Information Meeting Presentation of Final Draft Revision July 31, 2018

Habitat Connectivity and Wildlife Corridor Stakeholder Meeting

Planning Proposal Charlestown Swim and Leisure Centre LEP Amendment

City of Missoula and Missoula County Open Space Planning Open House

When planning stormwater management facilities, the following principles shall be applied where possible.

Ecological Restoration at the Las Vegas Springs Preserve. Von K. Winkel, Ph.D.

SECTION 5: REACH RECOMMENDATIONS/MAPS

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

Tentatively Selected Plan within Harlem River, East River and Western Long Island Sound Planning Region. First Level Costs. Federal Non-Federal Total

Grantham Southern Quadrant Link Road Environmental Statement

Rt. 29 Solutions Project Delivery Advisory Panel. January 7, 2016

Coquitlam River Riparian Planting

Improving an Urban Watershed The Past, Present and Future of Addison Creek

The scope of the plan will focus on the Prospect Heights Slough and Hillcrest Lake as one entity.

Figure 1. Bioswale along roadside. Photo courtesy of CalTrans. Figure 2. Diagram of typical bioswale (adapted from UDFCD 1999)

ANDERSON RIVER PARK SIDE CHANNEL HABITAT RESTORATION PROJECT. Public Outreach Meeting June 5, 2017

Snail Lake Overflow/Grass Lake Optimization Studies. May 2, Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District.

NYC DEP s Approach to Flood Mitigation: The Local Flood Analysis (LFA) Process

[FWS R8 R 2015 N087; FXRS282108E8PD0 156 F ] South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project, Phase 2; Don Edwards National Wildlife

Monday, September 14, :00 A.M. AV 201 Conference Room AGENDA

Dolores River Restoration Partnership. A Collaborative Approach to River Restoration and the Development of a New Generation of Land Stewards

Soil Erosion and Sediment Control

B & W Engineering Laboratories, Inc. P.O. Box Memphis, Tennessee (901)

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION PLAN

Existing Conditions and Environmental Consequences Floodplains

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 15, 2016

City of Kingston. North King s Town Secondary Plan Open House + Workshop #1 February 28, 2018

5 TH ANNUAL CAPE COASTAL CONFERENCE COONAMESSETT RIVER RESTORATION PROJECT. Elizabeth H. Gladfelter, Ph.D. Conservation Commission Town of Falmouth

Master Plan for Preservation and Scenic Conservation (1995)

Joint Public Notice. Public Notice Date: February 9, 2015 Expiration Date: March 11, 2015

Urban runoff in my neighborhood (Capitol Hill) is heavy with trash and other debris.

Terra Nova Rural Park Plan

MPO UPDATE. Metro Advisory Committee. August 8, 2017

Farmers Investment Co. (FICO) Continental Farms

RECEIVE AN UPDATE ON THE ALMOND GROVE PHASE II PROJECT

Environmental Resources Branch

Invasive non-native aquatic weeds: an often underestimated problem

BEACH AND INLET PROJECTS UPDATE

Attachment 5 -- PowerPoint. Item 6C- Attach 5- PPT Presentation Page 1 of 15

Transcription:

San Joaquin River Restoration Program Mendota Pool Bypass and Reach 2B Improvements Project Restoration Goal Technical Feedback Group March 20, 2014 1:30 pm San Luis and Delta-Mendota Water Authority 842 Sixth St., Los Banos, CA

Agenda Restoration Goal Update Fishery Actions Update Reach 2B Project Status Update Reach 2B Project Alternatives Reach 2B Operations

Reach 2B Project Update

Reach 2B Project Update Available Technical Reports 1. Final Scoping Report February 2010 2. Exist. Env. Conditions: Data Needs and Survey Approach TM March 2010 3. Initial Options TM April 2010 4. Analytical Tools TM October 2010 5. Final Field Survey Report November 2011 6. Project Description TM October 2012 Public Draft EIS/R anticipated End of 2014

Reach 2B Project Update Project Process and Schedule Scoping Alternatives Formulation Final TM Oct. 2012 Outreach/ Consensus Building EIS/R Public Draft EIS/R Late 2014 Final EIS/R Fall 2015 ROD/NOD ROD Winter 2015/2016 Detailed Design Land Acquisition Permitting Permits Fall 2016 Construction Procurement Land Acquisition begins 2016 Construction Construction begins 2017

Design Process Schedule Design Data Collection ongoing through 2014 Bypass and Structure Design 2014 and 2015 Reach 2B Levee Design 2015+ Construction start date 2017

Purpose: Design Data Collection Update Inform Levee and Structure Design Soil Stratigraphy Soil Density Shear Stress

Completed: Design Data Collection Update 40+ Standard Penetration Tests (SPTs) Several Undisturbed Drillholes

Completed: Design Data Collection Update 58 Cone Penetrometer Test (CPT) holes

Completed: Design Data Collection Update 3 monitoring wells Summer 2014: 40 SPTs 50+ CPTs Barge drilling Track drilling

Status Summary 2B Project moving forward with environmental compliance and design data collection concurrently Geotech investigations will lead to 10% design

Reach 2B Project Alternatives

Project Alternatives Vicinity Map

Project Alternatives Settlement Agreement Paragraph 11(a) (1) Creation of a bypass channel around Mendota Pool to ensure conveyance of at least 4,500 cfs from Reach 2B downstream to Reach 3. This improvement requires construction of a structure capable of directing flow down the bypass and allowing the Secretary to make deliveries of San Joaquin River water into Mendota Pool when necessary (2) Modifications in channel capacity (incorporating new floodplain and related riparian habitat) to ensure conveyance of at least 4,500 cfs in Reach 2B between the Chowchilla Bifurcation Structure and the new Mendota Pool bypass channel

Project Alternatives Overall Site Area

Major Components: Project Alternatives Major Project Components 1. Floodplain habitat 2 different floodplain widths 2. Bypass Restoration Flows around Mendota Pool 2 different routes 3. Deliver SJR water to Mendota Pool 4 different routes Combined variously to produce 4 alternatives for the EIS/R process Pieces can be combined differently for project implementation

Reach 2B Project Alternatives Four Alternatives presented in the Reach 2B Project Description TM Alternative A: Compact Bypass with Narrow Floodplain and South Canal Alternative B: Compact Bypass with Wide Floodplain and Bifurcation Structure Alternative C: Fresno Slough Dam with Narrow Floodplain and Short Canal Alternative D: Fresno Slough Dam with Wide Floodplain and North Canal

Alternative A Compact Bypass with Narrow Floodplain and South Canal Compact Bypass New channel and structures capable to convey up to 4,500 cfs of Restoration Flows around Mendota Pool Narrow Floodplain Floodplain habitat approx. 3,000 feet wide on average South Canal South Canal and structures to convey up to 2,500 cfs from Reach 2B to Mendota Pool (includes fish passage facility) Other Removal of Chowchilla riverside control structure

Alternative A Compact Bypass with Narrow Floodplain and South Canal

Alternative A Compact Bypass with Narrow Floodplain and South Canal

Alternative B Compact Bypass with Wide Floodplain and Bifurcation Structure Compact Bypass New channel and structures capable to convey up to 4,500 cfs of Restoration Flows around Mendota Pool Wide Floodplain Floodplain habitat approx. 4,200 feet wide on average Bifurcation Structure Mendota Pool control structure to convey up to 2,500 cfs from Reach 2B to Mendota Pool Other Fish passage facility at Compact bypass control structure Fish passage facility at Chowchilla riverside control structure

Alternative B Compact Bypass with Wide Floodplain and Bifurcation Structure

Alternative B Compact Bypass with Wide Floodplain and Bifurcation Structure

Alternative C Fresno Slough Dam with Narrow Floodplain and Short Canal Fresno Slough Dam New dam to restrict Mendota Pool to Fresno Slough so that up to 4,500 cfs of Restoration Flows can be conveyed around Mendota Pool Mendota Dam fish passage facility Narrow Floodplain Floodplain habitat approx. 3,000 feet wide on average Short Canal Short Canal and structures to convey up to 2,500 cfs from Reach 2B to Mendota Pool Other Fish passage facility at Chowchilla riverside control structure

Alternative C Fresno Slough Dam with Narrow Floodplain and Short Canal

Alternative C Fresno Slough Dam with Narrow Floodplain and Short Canal

Alternative D Fresno Slough Dam with Wide Floodplain and North Canal Fresno Slough Dam New dam to restrict Mendota Pool to Fresno Slough so that up to 4,500 cfs of Restoration Flows can be conveyed around Mendota Pool Mendota Dam fish passage facility Wide Floodplain Floodplain habitat approx. 4,200 feet wide on average North Canal North Canal and structures to convey up to 2,500 cfs from Reach 2B to Mendota Pool (with fish passage facility) Other Removal of Chowchilla riverside control structure

Alternative D Fresno Slough Dam with Wide Floodplain and North Canal

Alternative D Fresno Slough Dam with Wide Floodplain and North Canal

Reach 2B Project Operations

Project Operations Primary operations are flow routing Types of flows in Reach 2B: Restoration Flows Deliveries to Mendota Pool from the San Joaquin River Millerton Lake flood releases (via San Joaquin River) Pine Flat Reservoir flood releases (via Fresno Slough) Local diversions to and from Mendota Pool

Project Operations Flood Flow Scenarios Three basic flood flow scenarios: 1. No Flood Releases (critical-low to normal-wet water years) Restoration Flows will proceed through Reach 2B Irrigation deliveries and diversions will occur in Mendota Pool No interaction between the Restoration Flows in Reach 2B and Mendota Pool (outside of Exchange Contract delivery)

Project Operations No Flood Releases Alternative A Reach 3 Flows Up to 4,500 cfs Restoration Flows Up to 4,500 cfs Exchange Deliveries via South Canal Up to 2,500 cfs

Project Operations No Flood Releases Alternative B Reach 3 Flows Up to 4,500 cfs Exchange Deliveries via Bifurcation Structure Up to 2,500 cfs Restoration Flows Up to 4,500 cfs

Project Operations No Flood Releases Alternative C Reach 3 Flows Up to 4,500 cfs Close Mendota Gates & Reform Pool Exchange Deliveries via Short Canal Up to 2,500 cfs Restoration Flows Up to 4,500 cfs

Project Operations No Flood Releases Alternative D Reach 3 Flows Up to 4,500 cfs Exchange Deliveries via North Canal Up to 2,500 cfs Restoration Flows Up to 4,500 cfs

Project Operations Flood Flow Scenarios Three basic flood flow scenarios, cont.: 2. Flood Flows in San Joaquin (normal-wet to wet water years) Flood releases from Millerton Lake Flood flows possibly diverted from Reach 2B into the Chowchilla Bypass and/or Mendota Pool Some portion of flood flows is anticipated to perform as Restoration Flows in Reach 2B Flood management agencies will have ultimate discretion in directing flood flows

Project Operations Flood Flow Scenarios Three basic flood flow scenarios, cont.: 3. Flood flows in San Joaquin & Kings River (wet water years) Flood releases from Pine Flat Reservoir via Fresno Slough San Joaquin flood flows diverted from Reach 2B into the Chowchilla Bypass Some portion of the San Joaquin River flows is anticipated to perform as Restoration Flows in Reach 2B Flood management agencies will have ultimate discretion in directing flood flows

Questions?

Ali Forsythe SJRRP Program Manager 916-978-5464 aforsythe@usbr.gov www.restoresjr.net