Planning Commission Staff Report Project Plan Approval Hearing Date: June 14, 2017

Similar documents
APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS

Applicant Name Phone / Fax / Address City State Zip Code . Property Owner Phone / Fax / Address City State Zip Code

CHAPTER SPECIAL PURPOSE AND OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS

Urban Planning and Land Use

CHAPTER 2 SUMMARY 1. PROJECT SUMMARY DATA

AWH REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

LAND USE AMENDMENT CORNERSTONE (WARD 3) 60 STREET NE AND COUNTRY HILLS BOULEVARD NE MAP 26NE BYLAW 22D2017

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: May 18, 2017

EXHIBIT B PROJECT NARRATIVE POULSBO MEADOWS

Major Subdivision Sketch Plan Checklist

CITY OF VACAVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item No. G.1 STAFF REPORT February 21, 2012 BRIGHTON LANDING SPECIFIC PLAN & DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

Secrest Short Cut and Monroe Expressway Small Area Plan AUGUST 29, 2018

Glenborough at Easton Land Use Master Plan

Rezoning Petition Post-Hearing Staff Analysis February 5, 2019

KASPER. City of Georgetown, Texas PUD Planned Unit Development. December 30, 2015 Revised January 27, 2016

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION 2016 November 03. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

14 October 10, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT: MPB, INC

Rezoning Petition Zoning Committee Recommendation August 1, 2017

TOWN OF BRUDERHEIM Report to the capital region board

Baumgarten MPUD. Exhibit 3 Evaluation Criteria

ROLL CALL Member Anthony, Member Avdoulos, Member Greco, Member Lynch, Member Maday, Chair Pehrson

CONSERVATION SUBDIVISIONS & SITE DESIGN

City of Lafayette Study Session Staff Report Design Review Commission

SPECIFIC PLAN Requirements

Narcoossee Roadway Corridor

RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT / SUBDIVISION AND REZONING CONCEPT AND DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLAN SUBMITTAL NARRATIVE

Planning Commission Staff Report June 5, 2008

PART 1: PROJECT SUMMARY. Proposed Land Use: 120 single-family lots. The application is Attachment A. The site plan is Attachment B.

Asbury Chapel Subdivision Sketch Plan


ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 February 09. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Date: April 5, 2018

Staff Report and Recommendation

4 LAND USE DESIGNATIONS

LAND USE AMENDMENT CORNERSTONE (WARD 3) COUNTRY HILLS BOULEVARD AND STONEY TRAIL NE BYLAW 9D2017

Land Use Amendment in Southwood (Ward 11) at and Elbow Drive SW, LOC

13. PRELIMINARY PLAT NO MILLS FARM - Vicinity of the southeast corner of 159 th Street and Quivira Road

Gloucester County s Comprehensive Plan. The Community Connection

Osceola County Board of County Commissioners 1 Courthouse Square, Suite 1100 Kissimmee, FL

GRAND COUNTY Planning Commission April 27, :00 P.M. Regular Meeting GRAND CENTER North End Meeting Room 182 No. 500 W.

Application Number: SD Project Name: Walton Farms Preliminary Subdivision (acting as Master Plan)

CHAPTER 22 Rural Open Space Community Developments

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM: C STAFF: ROBERT TEGLER FILE NO: CPC PUD QUASI-JUDICIAL

Rapid City Planning Commission Rezoning Project Report

SONOMA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION

Planning Commission April 4, 2013 BOCC Workshop Page 1

CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

Chapter 10 IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS

ORDINANCE NO. City of Bellingham City Attorney 210 Lottie Street Bellingham, Washington INFILL HOUSING ORDINANCE Page 1

Rezoning Petition Final Staff Analysis June 18, 2018

DOMINION BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN A MODEL FOR CHESAPEAKE S FUTURE

Zoning Docket from April 16, 2018 Public Hearing CC DIST. STAFF REC. 21 Approval

Mitchell Ranch South MPUD Application for Master Planned Unit Development Approval Project Narrative. Introduction

GENERAL INFORMATIONaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

PLANNING APPROVAL & PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Date: November 2, 2017

Urban Planning and Land Use

DRAFT SCOPE OF SERVICES PEER REVIEW OF BAKER PARK. Request for Qualifications (RFQ)

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 June 15. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

Urban Planning and Land Use

Proposed Walkability Ordinance for City of Knoxville (6/16/17)

Major Development Plan

The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George's County Planning Department Development Review Division

Staff Report to the North Ogden City Planning Commission

City of Lafayette Study Session Staff Report Design Review Commission

Central and East Neighbourhoods - Hermitage Outline Plan

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis May 21, 2018

GENERAL PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

1.1 Planned Unit Development (PUD)

5. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL MENORAH MEDICAL CENTER OFFICE BUILDING Vicinity of the southwest corner of 119 th Street and Nall Avenue

Re: Thorncreek Commons Commercial Response to Pre-Application Meeting held September 24, 2014 Comments

Planning Commission Application Summary

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis July 16, 2018

This chapter describes the purpose of the Plan, introduces how the Plan is organized and provides contextual background for the Plan.

F. The following uses in the HR District: attached single-family dwellings, condominiums, and institutional uses; and

Rezoning. Rezone from C-4 and RA to RF-9C and RF-12C to allow subdivision into approximately 47 small single family lots in East Clayton.

Approved: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 5, :30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL

Notice of Preparation and Notice of Public Scoping Meeting. At Dublin Project

Planned Development Review Revisions (Project No. PLNPCM )

2.0 AREA PLANS. Lakeside Business District. Lakeside Business District Land Use Categories:

open public hearing and allow public comment request to continue LPA public hearing to January 16, 2014 at 10:30 am

Rezoning Transportation Analysis Petition Number: General Location Identifier:

CITY OF MOAB RESOLUTION #

Town of Liberty, NY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN & ZONING UPDATES

REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION 6A AGENDA ITEM

Urban Planning and Land Use

ARTICLE IV: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 404 MASTER PLANNING

Rapid City Planning Commission Comprehensive Plan Amendment Project Report

EAST LAKE TARPON COMMUNITY OVERLAY

12 January 12, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT: TAILWIND DEVELOPMENT GROUP,LLC PROPERTY OWNER: CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH

Village of Glenview Plan Commission

REZONING GUIDE. Zone Map Amendment (Rezoning) - Application. Rezoning Application Page 1 of 3. Return completed form to

Edward R. Sajecki Commissioner of Planning and Building. Region of Halton Proposed Regional Official Plan Amendment for 5768 Ninth Line

Cobb County Design Guidelines Mableton Parkway & Veterans Memorial Highway Community Design Workshop January 12, 2017

City of Lafayette Staff Report

LAND USE AMENDMENT DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL CORE (WARD 7) MACLEOD TRAIL SE AND 5 AVENUE SE BYLAW 254D2017

STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION April 30, Copper Creek of Nottingham 13 th Addition PUD Development Stage Plan and Final Plat

3.10 LAND USE SETTING PROJECT SITE EXISTING LAND USE DESIGNATIONS AND ZONING. General Plan Land Use Designations.

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT

November 21, Planning Commission Charter Township of Lyon Grand River Ave. New Hudson, MI 48165

Transcription:

Planning Commission Staff Report Project Plan Approval Hearing Date: June 14, 2017 ITEM 3 Peter Matson requests Project Plan Approval for an 80-acre mixed-use plan that includes 220 residential units and 3.84 acres of Neighborhood Commercial Shopping Center (SC-1) Zoning. The proposed zoning is R1.8(PD) and SC-1. The property is located at approximately 1560 South 1100 West. Sunset and Lakewood Neighborhoods. 16-0026PPA, Brian Maxfield, 801-852-6429 Applicant: Peter Matson Staff Coordinator: Brian Maxfield Property Owners: SRG Investment LC; Echo Ridge LC; J L C; John Roberts. Parcel ID#: 210550058; 210560103; 210560106; 210560096 Current Zone: Proposed Zone: R1.8PD; SC-1 General Plan Designation: Residential Acreage: 82.13 Number of Properties: 5 Number of Lots/Units: 220 Council Action Required: No ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Approve the proposed Project Plan. This action would not follow the recommendation of the staff report and the Planning Commission should state new findings. Current Legal Use: Uses allowed in the A1.5 Zone Relevant History: None Associated Request(s): Accompanying Rezoning Request (16-0014R) Neighborhood Issues: Comments from the Sunset Neighborhood Chair regarding the most recent neighborhood meeting (February 7, 2017) are attached. Answers to the proposed questions will be addressed at the Planning Commission meeting. Summary of Key Issues: 1. Availability of sewer. 2. Appropriateness of requested zones. 3. Required and desirable changes to associated project plan. Staff Recommendation: Deny the requested Project Plan based on the findings in the Staff Report. This action would be consistent with the recommendations of the Staff Report. 2. Continue to a future date to obtain additional information or to further consider information presented. The next available meeting date is June 28, 2017, 5:30 p.m.

June 14, 2017 Page 2 OVERVIEW The originally-proposed project plan included 82.13 acres, with 3.84 acres proposed to be designated as SC-1 Neighborhood Shopping Center, and 78.29 acres proposed as R1.8PD Single-family Residential Performance Development. The residential portion included a proposal for 220 residential units, which equaled just over 2.8 units per acre, and included five, 5-acre lots (26.89 acres) on the south side of the Lakeview Parkway. The most recent revision excludes the acreage on the south side of the parkway, resulting in a total area of 55.24 acres. A reconfiguration of the commercial area was also made so that it now includes 4.46 acres and fully extends through the area between 1560 South and the Lakeview Parkway. The remaining residential area now totals 50.78 acres and has a unit count of 213 units, or just under 4.2 units per acre. The submitted project plan includes only the residential portion of the project. It is proposed to be developed under the allowances of Chapter 14.31. PD Performance Development Overlay Zone. The Performance Development Overlay allows three major variations to the standards of the underlying zone. First, besides single-family detached units, the overlay allows single-family attached units. Second, residential units can be clustered, allowing for variations in the minimum lot sizes. Third, the PD allows a bonus density on top of the general base density. As stated in the Chapter 14.31, a Performance Development (PD) is: a residential development planned as a whole, single complex. It incorporates a definite development theme which includes the elements of usable open spaces, diversity of lot design or residential use, amenities, a well planned circulation system, and attractive entrances as part of the design. The incorporation of one (1) or two (2) of these elements into a development does not make a PD. The combination of all of these elements is necessary for the development of a PD. (Section 14.31.010(2)) Additionally, the Chapter gives the stated purpose of the Performance development Overlay zone as: to encourage imaginative and efficient utilization of land, to develop a sense of community, and to insure compatibility with the surrounding neighborhoods and environment. (Section 14.31.010(1)) The proposed PD portion of the development is divided into three residential areas: A singlelevel living area (17.18 acres and 72 units); a standard lot area (20.00 acres and 67 units); and an attached living area (8.05 acres and 74 units). The single-level living area and the attached living area are intended to be marketed to empty-nesters and seniors. The letter of intent included with the rezoning (and referencing the initial site plan), includes the following paragraphs related to the development of the property:

June 14, 2017 Page 3 STAFF ANALYSIS The follow is the staff analysis of the project to date. At this time, staff does not believe the applicant complies with the listed requirements of Chapter 14.31 (PD Overlay Zone), nor with all requirements of Title 15 regarding Land Use and Development. Critical concerns include the following: Ability to Provide Sewer: In the Wastewater Collection System 2010 Master Plan, a lift station was identified in the Southwest portion of Provo (W4.2 on the attached drawing). This lift station was not included in the CIP for the next 5 years. The lift station north of the airport (W1.5) had been budgeted for and was scheduled to be constructed this coming year. In addition, portions of the Geneva Outfall had been budgeted for (W2.1-W2.5). However, as the design proceeded with the Geneva Outfall, several issues were identified that affected the feasibility of the mainline. Alternatives were considered, and moving the outfall to the Lakeview Parkway emerged as the most feasible. This alternative is anticipated to consolidate five lift stations into one regional lift station and allow the southwest portion of Provo to develop sooner than it would have under the previous master plan scenario. Several items need to be worked out to ensure the feasibility and timing of the Lakeview Parkway alignment alternative including finalizing the alignment, pipe sizing, and locating the regional lift station. Provo has hired Horrocks Engineers to perform the design for the Westside Sewer Outfall Project along the Lakeview Parkway and update the master plan on the Westside to reflect the new plan. Horrocks was put under contract with Provo City in May 2017. In order to assure viability and timing of this project, we need to get to 30% design drawings. Horrocks sent Provo a letter that states when the 30% milestone is expected to be attained (See Attached). Until

June 14, 2017 Page 4 then, Provo cannot guarantee the alignment, lift station location or assure the timing for completion of the aforementioned improvements. Associated Project Plan: Several items related to the layout of the proposed development have not yet been resolved with the City s Coordinator s Review Committee (CRC). These principally include, but are not limited to: 1. The re-location of the access point on Lakeview Parkway, closer to the mid-point between 1100 and 1600 North; 2. The development of the Big Dry Creek area along the western boundary of the project as a linear park, to provide a natural connection between this project and other properties within the larger block area (between 1100 and 1600 West, and between 1150 South and Lakeview Parkway). This requirement is based on subsection (1)(h) in Section14.31.080 Minimum Performance Standards, and is further supported by Subsections 2b, 2c, and 2e of the Westside Development Policies: (1) General Standards: (h) Natural Features. Developments shall be designed to preserve and incorporate the natural features of the land into the development. Natural features include drainage swales, wetlands, rock outcroppings, steams, and concentrated native stands of large shrubs or trees. Westside Development Policies 2. Preserve and Create Quality Usable Open Space a. Update and utilize the Parks and Recreation Master Plan to provide developed parks and open space that satisfy a range of leisure and recreational needs. b. Preserve and develop natural amenities for sustained enjoyment by the community. Examples include the Provo River and banks, the Provo River Delta, Utah Lake shoreline, and wetlands. c. Provide parks and trails of different uses and sizes. d. Encourage agri-tourism as a means to provide agriculturally themed open space. e. Useable neighborhood open space should be an integral part of neighborhood design or combined to serve larger areas than the immediate development. 3. More efficient road connections to the properties to the west as represented in the local road concept plan for the larger block area. These connections are also emphasized in Section 14.31.080(5) regarding Minimum Performance Standards for Streets within a PD Overlay Zone. 4. Details of meeting requirements for Compatibility Standards (Section 14.31.080.(2)), including (c) Curb Appeal.

June 14, 2017 Page 5 5. Details of meeting requirements for Design Theme (Section 14.31.080(3)), including (b) Visual Relief; and (c) Unified Design. Details of an entry way have been submitted are included in the attachments. 6. The prosed open space does not appear to staff to be adequate or usable. Details of meeting requirements for Open Space (Section 14.31.080(4)). The most recent CRC Project Analysis is attached to this report. The attached CRC staff comments include a more extended list of necessary revisions. However, even given the applicant s ability to address those listed comments, it needs to be understood that the comments only address the project with the proposed PD Overlay zoning. If the requested zoning designations are modified, additional review and revisions may need to be made to reflect the adopted zoning. CONCLUSIONS Due to the outstanding issues regarding the utilities, the appropriate zoning, and the requested redesign of portions of the proposed subdivision, staff believes it would be premature to approve the project plan in its existing configuration and detail. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Deny the requested Project Plan for the following reasons: 1. The necessary and appropriate sewer facilities for the project cannot be provided at this time. 2. The proposed plan does not meet all requirements of Chapter 14.31 regarding the PD Overlay Zone. 3. The proposed plan does not include or otherwise adequately address the revisions called out the by the City s Coordinator s Review Committee.

June 14, 2017 Page 6

June 14, 2017 Page 7 Initial Submittal (November 2016)

June 14, 2017 Page 8 Most Recent Submittal (February 23, 2017)

June 14, 2017 Page 9

June 14, 2017 Page 10

June 14, 2017 Page 11

June 14, 2017 Page 12 Entry detail to meet the requirements of Section 14.31.080(3)(a)

June 14, 2017 Page 13 Block Area Concept Plan

June 14, 2017 Page 14

June 14, 2017 Page 15

June 14, 2017 Page 16 Wastewater / Lift Station Study Area

June 14, 2017 Page 17

June 14, 2017 Page 18

June 14, 2017 Page 19

June 14, 2017 Page 20

June 14, 2017 Page 21

June 14, 2017 Page 22

June 14, 2017 Page 23

June 14, 2017 Page 24