The influence of food colorants on the growth and development of in vitro plantlets belonging to different Romanian varieties

Similar documents
INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT IN VITRO SIMULATORS FOR HYDRIC STRESS FOR GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF POTATO

Effect of different levels of sucrose on microtuberization and different substrates on minituber production resulted from potato meristem culture

EXPERIMENTING HYDROPONIC CULTURE SYSTEMS ON DIFFERENT SUBSTRATES TO OBTAIN POTATO MINITUBERS

Plantlet Regeneration via Somatic Embryogenesis in Four Species of Crocus

COMPORTAREA UNOR SOIURI DE CAIS ÎN FAZA DE MULTIPLICARE IN VITRO BEHAVIOUR OF SOME APRICOT CULTIVARS DURING IN VITRO MULTIPLICATION PHASE

Establishment of in vitro multiplication biotechnology of the species Albizzia lebbeck L.

ORGANOGENESIS IN CHRYSANTHEMUM MORIFOLIUM RAMAT (CULTIVAR ROMICA ) CALLUS CULTURES SMARANDA VÂNTU

IN VITRO PERFECTED PROPAGATION BIOTECHNOLOGY OF PRUNUS SERRULATA SPECIES

Low-Cost Alternatives for Conventional Tissue Culture Media

Băla Maria 1, Toţa Cristina Elena, 1 Berar C. 1, Silivăşan M. 1. Results and Discussions. Material and Method

TISSUE CULTURE AND EX-VITRO ACCLIMATION OF RHODODENDRON sp.

In vitro regeneration capacity of the ornamental varieties related to the cultural media

In Vitro Multiplication, Conservation and Ex Vitro Acclimation of Drosera rotundifolia

The effects of BA and NAA on multiplication of Butterwort (Pinguicula gigantea) in vitro

Keywords: Agarwood, satalum, resin, micropropagation, tok

INMULTIREA IN VITRO A PORTALTOIULUI DE CIRES GISELA 5 IN VITRO PROPAGATION OF GISELA 5 CHERRY ROOTSTOCK

Micro propagation of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) through auxiliary buds

The influence of different types of substrates on rooting of Fuchsia cuttings

Effect of different salinity levels on In vitro and Ex vitro growth of potato. Students: Ahmed Abu-Madi, Ali Nawsreh, Mutaz Arfat andmusab Bani Oedhe

Studies on the influence of genotype and culture media composition on growing explants in the in vitro initiation phase

Effect of Genotype, Explant Type and Culture Medium on Shoot Regeneration in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) in vitro

The Potato micropropagation

In vitro propagation of Musa sp (Banana)

MICROPROPAGATION OF CHRYSANTHEMUM (CHRYSANTHEMUM MORIFOLIUM) USING SHOOT TIP AS EXPLANT

EFFECT OF GROWTH REGULATORS ON MERISTEM TIP CULTURE OF LOCAL POTATO CVS DESIREE AND PATRONES

Researches regarding bitter melon (Momordica charantia) in vitro regeneration

IN VITRO PROPAGATION OF THE BALKAN ENDEMIC SPECIES VERBASCUM ERIOPHORUM GODR. Abstract. Introduction

Received : Accepted:

Effect of soil works and sowing time on yield in winter two-row barley

SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS AND REGENERATION OF PLANTLET IN SAFFRON, CROCUS SATIVUS L.

Influence of the fertilization on the maintaining of the quality of croton plants (Codiaeum) cultivated in pots

Environmental and Genotypic Effects on the Growth Rate. of in Vitro Cassava Plantlet

Somaclonal Variation in Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Using Chemical Mutagens

Seed Culture of Aromatic Rice Varieties Under Salt Stress

CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE EFFECTS OF GROWTH REGULATORS OVER THE IN VITRO MORPHOGENETIC REACTION AT ORIGANUM VULGARE L.

Effect of Cytokinins on Multiple Shoot Regeneration from Leaf Derived Callus of Inula

IPC TECHNICAL PAPER SERIES NUMBER 264

PRODUCTION OF DISEASE FREE QUALITY SUGARCANE PLANTING MATERIALTHROUGH MICROPROPAGATION

Efficacy of in-vitro Propagation among Some Advanced Potato Clones and Evaluation of Yield Character for the Production of Nucleus Seed

In vitro Conservation of Rose Coloured Leadwort: Effect of Mannitol on Growth of Plantlets

THE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF KINETIN AND AIA ON SOYBEAN ORGANOGENESIS Marele Daniela *

RMUTP Research Journal Special Issue

In-vitro Regeneration of Bambusa balcooa (Bamboo) through Nodal Segments

MICROPROPAGATION OF RICE (ORYZA SATIVA L. CV SWAT-II) THROUGH SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS

MICROPHOPAGATION OF DATE PALM (PHOENIX TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUE

Title: Enhancement of Bramble Production in the Southeastern U.S. Through Micropropagation, Virus Indexing, and Field Evaluation for Trueness to Type

MICROPROPAGATION OF JATROPHA CURCAS (L.)

Researches concerning the impact of some soil maintenance systems upon fruits quality of Generos apple tree variety

Title: Development of Micropropagation and Acclimation Protocols for the Commercialization of a New Bonsai Ornamaental Tree for the California Market.

International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences RAPID IN VITRO PROPAGATION TECHNIQUE FOR SUGARCANE VARIETY 018

FERN MULTIPLICATION KIT

Direct Regeneration of Shoot from Axillary Bud of Citrus Reticulate

CHAPTER 2. IN VITRO REGENERATION OF Gerbera jamesonii Bolus Ex. Hook f. Previous research has proven that Gerbera jamesonii could successfully be

THE INITIATION OF LOTUS (Nelumbo nucifera) VITROCULTURE

Adult Plants and Juvenile Seedlings of Persimmon (Diospyros kaki L.)

Chapter 1 Introduction

Micropropagation of GF-677 rootstocks (Prunus amygdalus x P. persica)

Plant Tissue Culture. Dr. Alain Lemansour UAE University Date Palm Development Research Unit Dept.

IJBPAS, May, 2012, 1(4): ISSN:

Research on the influence of seed tuber size and planting density on the yield of potato grown on sandy soils

RAPID MICROPROPAGATION OF GRAPEVINE CV. AGIORGITIKO THROUGH LATERAL BUD DEVELOPMENT

INFLUENCE OF PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS ON IN VITRO CLONAL PROPAGATION OF DENDROBIUM SONIA EARSAKUL

A micropropagation system for Eucalyptus dunnii Eucalyptus sp

Micropropagation provides rapid reliable system for the production of

Teodora Iuliana VIDICAN 1, Dorina CACHITA-COSMA 2 1 University of Oradea, Romania 2 Vasile Goldis Western University of Arad, Romania

IMPROVED MICROPROPAGATION AND ROOTING OF DWARFING PEAR ROOTSTOCKS

III. ÎNMULŢIRE, VIROLOGIE ŞI CULTURI DE ŢESUTURI PROPAGATION, VIROLOGY AND TISSUE CULTURE

Plant Regeneration via Organogenesis and Somatic Embryogenesis

Virus and bacteria elimination from in vitro sweetpotato plants. International Potato Center (CIP)

In vitro Plant Regeneration of Withania somnifera. Ujjwala Supe, Fanisha Dhote and M.G. Roymon

In vitro regeneration performance of Corchorus olitorius

Effect of Gelling Agent on In vitro Tuberization of Potato

Effect of sucrose on inducing in vitro microtuberization in potato without using any growth hormone

ABSTRACT OF THE PHD THESIS

Plant regeneration of Anthurium andreanum cv Rubrun

SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS OF DREPANOSTACHYUM FALCATUM AN IMPORTANT HILL BAMBOO-A RAPID MEANS OF MICROPROPAGATION

SK. Jaffar * et al. /International Journal Of Pharmacy&Technology

In Vitro Regeneration of Aloe Vera (Aloe barbadensis Mill)

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT CULTURAL CONDITIONS ON MICROPROPAGATION OF ROSE (ROSA INDICA L.)

Factors affecting bulblet growth of Lilium sp. in vitro and in vivo

VETIVER PROPAGATION. Nurseries and Large Scale Propagation. Dr Paul Truong Veticon Consulting Brisbane, Australia

In Vitro Microcorm Formation in Saffron (Crocus sativus L.)

Effect of Cultivar and Growth Regulator on In vitro Micropropagation of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L)

IN VITRO GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF DENDROBIUM HYBRID ORCHID. H. KHATUN 1, M. M. KHATUN 2, M. S. BISWAS 3 M. R. KABIR 4 AND M. AL-AMIN 5 Abstract

Propagation of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) by Seedlings

*University of Oradea, Faculty of Enviromental Protection,11 Borsecului St., Oradea,

MICROCLONAL PROPAGATION BLACK CURRANT

IN VITRO PROPAGATION OF SPATHIPHYLLUM FLORIBUNDUM (L) PETITE

Summary and conclusion

COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT DOSES OF PLANT GROWTH HORMONES ON CALLUS INDUCTION AND REGENERATION IN SUGARCANE

Micropropagation of Sterile and Non-Flowering Nicotiana Lines

EX-SITU CONSERVATION OF LAVANDULA ANGUSTIFOLIA USING IN VITRO TECHINQUES. BY Dr. D. LEELAVATHI MES COLLEGE,MALLESWARAM, Bangalore

III. ÎNMULŢIRE, VIROLOGIE ŞI CULTURI DE ŢESUTURI PROPAGATION, VIROLOGY AND TISSUE CULTURE

Department of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, Igdir University, Igdir, Turkey

THE REACTION OF THE LOTUS CORNICULATUS L. MERISTEM CULTIVATED IN VITRO ON LINSMAIER-SKOOG (LS) BASAL MEDIUM CORNICULATUS L.)

Establishment and Growth of Potato Micro-Cuttings in Sand Trays

Impact of Monochromatic Lights Treatment on In Vitro Regeneration of Celastrus paniculatus

Influence of Genotype Source on the In Vitro Regeneration Ability of Malaysian Chilli Varieties

THE POSSIBILITY OF CONTROLLING SCLEROTIUM ROLFSII ON SOYBEAN (GLYCINE MAX) USING TRICHODERMA AND TEBUCONAZOLE*) OKKY S.

PROPAGATION AND RETESTING OF WALNUT ROOTSTOCK GENOTYPES PUTATIVELY RESISTANT TO PESTS AND DISEASES

Transcription:

Volume 21(1), 122-126, 2017 JOURNAL of Horticulture, Forestry and Biotechnology www.journal-hfb.usab-tm.ro The influence of food colorants on the growth and development of in vitro plantlets belonging to different Romanian varieties Popa Monica, Tican Andreea, Chiru Nicoleta, Cioloca Mihaela, Bădărărău Carmen, Lukacs Sara Emoke National Institute of Research and Development for Potato and Sugar Beet Brasov *Corresponding author. Email: monica.popa@potato.ro Abstract In 2016 has made a study to determine the influence of food colorants on plantlets. The experience was bifactorial with experimental factor a: food colorant (used in the nutritive medium) with 6 graduations: colorless, yellow, violet, green, red, blue and experimental factor b, the cultivar with 3 graduations: Roclas, Rustic and Zamolxis. It has been researched the influence of food colorants over the plantlets, the of leaves, the root. The green food colorant present good results over the parameters analyzed, presented significant difference, statistical assured compared to control (colorless food colorant). Regarding the of leaves, there were no statistical differences, compared to control. Regarding the influence of cultivar, Zamolxis recorded significant difference for two elements: plantlets and of leaves, compared to control (Roclas). Key words in vitro, food colorant, cultivar, plantlets, nutritive medium, potato In vitro culture techniques is the most sure way to obtain a starting material free of pathogens and the fastest way to promote new varieties of potato. After applying ELISA technique, plants free of pathogens agents are multiplied and microplants obtained are microcuttings in vitro for producing minitubers [2]. In countries without cold winters, to break the cycle pathogenic, seed potato production is difficult due to high pressure of infection with virus throughout the year. It was applied a new accessible and efficient method, in 2016, by potato varieties micropropagation on colored backgrounds, consisting of food naturals colorants added to nutrient medium for stimulate multiplication rate and improving the process of rooting in vitro and ex vitro. It was used Romanian varieties, with white shell - yellowish pulp. too. The varieties selected for experience were: Roclas, Zamolxis and Rustic. The advantage of in vitro micropropagation is rapid multiplication to infinity, a genetically identical plant material from which was started, in particular the material "rejuvenated", healthy and more homogeneous. Meristem culture is thus the starting point in obtaining a healthy material to initiate a culture in vitro [1]. Potatoes are easily susceptible to many pests and diseases. The use of tissue culture technology for the rapid multiplication of the planted material free of disease has facilitated the production of seed potatoes in large quantities. For successful cultivation of explants in vitro plant has an important role to achieve mixes nutrients to meet vital needs and inoculated tissue explants in vitro [4]. Explants vegetal can be kept alive by inoculation and growth on aseptic medium, complex in terms of their chemical composition. Choice of culture medium composition is made depending on the purpose. For potato, the most used medium is Murashige Skoog (1962), but they are used media Gamborg et colab. (1968 B5), Linsmaier- Skoog(1965)(LS); Nitsch(1969), White(1963). Rapid multiplication is very flexible and provides a high multiplier. Also produce disease-free seed potato, from seed carriers of disease. Chemical elements, indispensable for vegetal explants growth, cultured on aseptic media, as well as the the compounds under which they have to find the culture substrate have been established on the basis of research carried out over time by plant nutrition specialists and testing. Materials and Method In 2016, was performed an experience in which was determined the influence of food colorants on plantlets, bifactorial experience a*b, with 18 variants distributed in 5 repetitions, using the following degrees: - The experimental factor a: food colorant (used in the nutritive medium) with 6 graduations:-a1: colorless (without food colorant - control nutritive medium); -a2: yellow; -a3: violet; -a4: green; -a5: red; -a6: blue. The experimental factor b: the cultivar with 3 graduations: -b1: Roclas; -b2: Rustic; -b3: Zamolxis. 122

As a control was fixed the variant of Roclas variety, experienced on medium Murashige Skoog without food colorant. The experience has as a starting point meristems of Romanian varieties Roclas, Rustic and Zamolxis created at NIRDPSB Brasov. Meristems taken from potato sprouts are inoculated "in vitro" for obtaining a healthy pre-basic material. After a period of 6-8 months from meristems are developing plantles. To ensure phytosanitary accuracy is made ELISA test and infected clones are removed, continuing multiplication from healthy ones. The developed plantlets are cut to each internode level into minicuttings. These are inoculated to nutrient medium. After 4 weeks (when plantlets were developed) were made determinations about over the plantlets, the of leaves, the root. The nutrient medium used was Murashige- Skoog (supplemented with sucrose 2%, agar 0.8%, NAA 0.5 mg/l), the ph was reduced to 5.6-5.8. Were used five food colorant added to Murashige-Skoog and comparative with these, it was used the control medium (Murashige-Skoog). The medium was sterilized by autoclaving for 15'. Were used for experimentation Roclas, Rustic and Zamolxis varieties to determine the behavior of these varieties under the influence of food colorants (figure 1). Fig.1 The influence of food colorant over the potato plantlets development Results and Discussions The statistical interpretation of the food colorants over the plantlets highlights positive differences for violet (2.33 cm), green (1.97 cm), red (2.27 cm) and blue (2.00 cm) food colorants used in nutritive medium comparative with medium without food colorant (table 1). Influence of food colorants used on culture medium over the plantlets colorants The plantlets The plantlets Dif. Sign. cm cm Colorless (Ct) 8.00 - - Yellow 9.67 120.88 1.67 ns Violet 10.33 129.13 2.33 * Green 9.97 124.63 1.97 * Red 10.27 128.38 2.27 * Blue 10.00 125.00 2.00 * DL 5%= 1.71 cm; DL 1%= 2.67 cm; DL 0.1%= 4.55 cm. Influence of food colorants used on culture medium over the of leaves colorants Number of Dif. Sign. leaves % Colorless (Ct) 8.00 - - Yellow 8.33 104.17 0.33 ns Violet 8.73 109.17 0.73 ns Green 8.60 107.50 0.60 ns Red 8.67 108.33 0.67 ns Blue 8.67 108.33 0.67 ns DL 5%= 1.15; DL 1%= 1.80; DL 0.1%= 3.07. Table 1 Table 2 123

In the case of food colorants influence over the of leaves the best value recorded violet food colorant (8.73 leaves), but without statistical difference compared to control (8.00 leaves) (Table 2). In the case of the influence of food colorants over the root, it appears that green food colorant present a positive significant difference compared to control (medium without food colorant), the difference was 1.90 cm (Table 3). The statistical analysis performed for each varieties shows that plantlets is bigger for Zamolxis variety, with a positive difference comparative (3.87 cm) with control variety (Roclas) (Table 4). Analysis of the varieties used in the experiment shows that the best results were achieved for Zamolxis variety with a of leaves by 9.07 and with a with positive difference of 1.23 leaves, comparative with control variety (Table 5). Influence of food colorants used on culture medium over the root colorants Root Dif. Sign. Colorless (Ct) 7.63 - - - Yellow 7.87 103.11 0.24 ns Violet 8.33 109.22 0.70 ns Green 9.53 124.95 1.90 * Red 7.63 100.04 0.00 ns Blue 7.30 95.67-0.33 ns DL 5%= 1.41 cm; DL 1%= 2.21 cm; DL 0.1%= 3.76 cm. The influence of variety on the average plantlets The plantlets Dif. Sign. Roclas (Ct) 8.17 100.00 - - Rustic 8.92 109.14 0.75 ns Zamolxis 12.03 147.29 3.87 * DL 5%= 2.38 cm; DL 1%= 5.50 cm; DL 0.1%= 17.49 cm. The influence of variety over the of leaves Number of Dif. Sign. leaves % Roclas (Ct) 7.83 100.00 - - Rustic 8.60 109.83 0.77 ns Zamolxis 9.07 115.79 1.23 * DL 5%= 1.17; DL 1%= 2.70; DL 0.1%= 8.58. The influence of variety over the root Root Dif. Sign. Roclas (Ct) 8.83 100.00 - - Rustic 7.98 95.27-0.40 ns Zamolxis 8.30 99.05-0.08 ns DL 5%= 2.05 cm; DL 1%= 4.73 cm; DL 0.1%= 15.05 cm. Table 3 Table 4 Table 5 Table 6 Analyzing the averages mean / variety for the root (Table 6) can be noticed that the differences are low not significant, but negative (comparative with control) statistically assured -0.40 cm for Rustic variety and -0.08 cm for Zamolxis variety. 124

Combined influence of food colorants used on culture medium and variety over the plantlets Plantlets Dif Sig Plantlets Dif Sig Plantlets Dif Sig Plantlets Dif Sig Plantlets Dif Sig Plantlets Dif Sig a2-a1 a3-a1 a4-a1 a5-a1 a6-a1 Roclas, b 1 7.2-6.4-8.8-9.9-8.2-8.9 - -0.4 ns 2.0 * 3.1 ** 1.4 ns 2.1 * Rustic, b 2 9.2 0.8 ns 8.4 2.0 ns 8.9 0.1 ns 8.4-1.5 ns 9.8 1.6 ns 9.4 0.5 ns -0.2 ns 0.3 ns -0.2 ns 1.2 ns 0.8 ns Zamolxis, b 3 7.6 1.2 ns 14.2 7.8 *** 13.3 4.5 ** 11.6 1.7 ns 12.8 4.6 ** 11.7 2.8 * 5.6 *** 4.7 *** 3 ** 4.2*** 3.1 ** DL 5%= 2.73 cm; DL 5%= 1.97 cm; DL 1%= 3.63 cm; DL 1%= 2.77 cm; DL 0.1%= 4.73 cm. DL 0.1%= 4.00 cm. Table 8 Combined influence of food colorants used on culture medium and variety over the of leaves Leaves Table 7 Dif Sig a2-a1 a3-a1 a4-a1 a5-a1 a6-a1 Roclas, b 1 7.2-7.2-8.2-8.4-8 - 7.2-0.0 ns 1.0 ns 1.2 * 0.8 ns 0.8 ns Rustic, b 2 9.2 2 ** 8.6 1.4 * 8.4 0.2 ns 8.6 0.2 ns 8 0.0 ns 9.2 2.0 ** -0.6 ns -0.8 ns -0.6 ns -1.2 o -0.4 ns Zamolxis, b 3 7.6 0.4 ns 9.2 2.0 ** 9.6 1.4 * 8.8 0.4 ns 10 2.0 ** 7.6 0.4 ns 1.6 * 2.0 ** 1.2 * 2.4 ** 1.6 * DL 5%= 1.34; DL 5%= 1.13; DL 1%= 1.78; DL 1%= 1.61; DL 0.1%= 2.32. DL 0.1%= 2.42. Table 9 Combined influence of food colorants used on culture medium and variety over the root Root Dif Sig Root Dif Sig Root Dif Sig Root Dif Sig Root Dif Sig Root Dif Sig a2-a1 a3-a1 a4-a1 a5-a1 a6-a1 Roclas, b 1 8.3-7.8-8.3-9.2-9.3-7.4 - -0.5 ns 0.0 ns 0.9 ns 1.0 ns -0.9 ns Rustic, b 2 6.6-1.7 ns 9.4 1.6 ns 7.5-0.8 ns 7.5-1.7 ns 10 0.7 ns 6.9-0.5 ns 2.8 ** 0.9 ns 0.9 ns 3.4*** 0.3 ns Zamolxis, b 3 8-0.3 ns 8.8 1.0 ns 7.8-0.5 ns 8.3-0.9 ns 9.3 0.0 ns 7.6 0.2 ns 0.8 ns -0.2 ns 0.9 ns 1.3 ns -0.4 ns DL 5%= 2.34 cm; DL 5%= 1.67 cm; DL 1%= 3.13 cm; DL 1%= 2.34 cm; DL 0.1%= 4.07 cm. DL 0.1%= 3.37 cm. 125

In case of combined influece of food colorants used on culture medium and variety over the plantlets the best result was recorded for Zamolxis, by using yellow food colorant, with a very significant positive difference 7.8 cm, comparative to Roclas variety (Table 7). Comparative with control medium the best results over the of leaves were recorded for red food colorant with a distinct positive difference (2.0 leaves), by using Zamolxis variety, folowed by violet food colorant, for the same variety (1.4) (Table 8). The combined influence of food colorants used on culture medium and variety over the root shows that red food colorant registered for Rustic variety a very distinct semnificative difference, positive (3.4 cm) (Table 9). Conclusions The green food colorant present good results over the parameters analyzed and presented positive significant difference, statistical assured compared to control (colorless food colorant, for culture medium where was not added food colorant). Regarding the of leaves, there were no statistical differences, compared to control. Regarding the influence of cultivar, Zamolxis recorded positive significant difference for two elements: plantlets (3.87 cm) and of leaves (1.23), compared to control (Roclas). References 1.Chiru Nicoleta, 1998: Înmulţirea in vitro" a cartofului (Solanum tuberosum L.) prin culturi de ţesuturi, Teză de doctorat, Universitatea din Oradea, Facultatea de Stiinţe, 1998. 2.Cachiţă-Cosma Dorina şi Camelia Sand, 2000: Biotehnologie Vegetală, Vol. I, Baze teoretice şi practice, Sibiu, Ed. Mira Design. 3.Dodds J.H., 1988: Tissue culture technology: practical application of sophisticated methods. Am. Potato J. 65, pg. 167-180. 4.Roca W. M., Espinoza N. O., Roca M. R, Bryan J. E., 1978: A tissue culture method for the rapid propagation of potatoes. American Potato Journal 55, pg. 691-701. 126