TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PINELLAS COUNTY MPO LIVABLE COMMUNITIES INITIATIVE PINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS

Similar documents
The Five Components of the McLoughlin Area Plan

CHAPTER 1. Ms. Guajardo s Class - Central Elementary CH 1 1

CITY OF PUYALLUP. Background. Development Services

FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT

Future Five. Design/ Development Guidelines. January 2008 Amended June 08 per City Council motion

Lehigh Acres Land Development Regulations Community Planning Project

Subregion 4 Central Avenue-Metro Blue Line Corridor Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Implementation Project. Community Meeting April 27, 2011

Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center

The University District envisions, in its neighborhood

Plano Tomorrow Vision and Policies

EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

B L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development

Concord Community Reuse Project Goals and Guiding Principles. Overarching Goals (OG)

Tony Garcia, City-County Planning Commission & Beth Alden, Hillsborough MPO

Planning Charlotte s Future. Planning Committee June 21, 2016

City of Hermosa Beach Administrative Policy #

Ann Arbor Downtown Street Design Manual. Ann Arbor DDA IDA 2015 Awards Planning Category

TOD 101 CREATING LIVABLE COMMUNITIES WITH TRANSIT

Citizen Advisory Group Meeting 5: Land Use April 14, 2011

Chapter 6. Conclusions and Recommendations

The Need to Develop a Transit Ready Community

B. Blocks, Buildings and Street Networks

Chapter 4. Linking Land Use with Transportation. Chapter 4

CHAPTER 3 VISION, GOALS, & PLANNING PRINCIPLES. City of Greensburg Comprehensive Plan. Introduction. Vision Statement. Growth Management Goals.

Transportation Working Team Duane Diggs, Co-Chair (VOICE Buffalo) Kelly Dixon, Co-Chair (GBNRTC) Paul Ray, Facilitator (UB Regional Institute)

2. MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Goals, Objectives, and Policies

SECTION TWO: Overall Design Guidelines

Chapter 6--Urban Design

4.1.3 LAND USE CATEGORIES

Urban Design Manual PLANNING AROUND RAPID TRANSIT STATIONS (PARTS) Introduction. Station Study Areas

DRAFT DESIGN GUIDELINES

Implementation Guide Comprehensive Plan City of Allen

TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT POLICY DRAFT. City Planning and Development Department Kansas City, Missouri

Goals, Objectives and Policies

City of Villages Parking Strategies. William Anderson, FAICP City Planning & Community Investment San Diego Parking Symposium July 14, 2006

Highland Village Green Design Guidelines

2040 LUP is a part of the Comprehensive Plan and carries the same legal authority. Economic Challenges

TRANSIT NEIGHBORHOOD PLANS PROGRAM OVERVIEW

PROTECT AND PROMOTE QUALITY OF LIFE AND LIVABILITY FOR THE CITIZENS OF GAINESVILLE THROUGH QUALITY URBAN DESIGN.

ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts

EXHIBIT A. Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 1 (Town Center) First Amended Project Plan 1

Transit-Oriented Development

FLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist

2030 Comprehensive Plan VISION STATEMENT

II. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

4.0 Design Guidelines For The Village Centre. South fields Community Architectural Design Guidelines Town of Caledon

12/9/2013. HOLLYWOOD/PINES CORRIDOR PROJECT AMPO 2013 Annual Conference October 24, Our Perspective. Broward.

Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

Incentive Zoning Regulations Florida Municipal City of Orlando

SUBCHAPTER 4-B GUIDELINES FOR THE B-3 COMMERCIAL CHARACTER AREA

A Healthy Future Walkability Through Community Design. Fit Families North Carolina October 18, 2004

MEMORANDUM. I2 District Downtown Parking Overlay District 24,000 square feet /.55 acres. Industrial Employment District North Loop Small Area Plan

Proposed Comprehensive Plan Strategies DRAFT for discussion June 28, 2017

Robbinsdale LRT Station. CDI Development Guidelines. August Overview

Chapter 3: Land Use and Local Planning

Planned Residential Neighborhoods Land Use Goals

Project Update. Hillsborough County 2045 Population and Employment Projections and Allocations. Board of County Commissioners February 13, 2018

GUIDING PRINCIPLES IN THIS CHAPTER

CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation

Port Credit Local Advisory Panel October 20 th Meeting

Seneca Meadows. Block 4 Locate office, technology, and medical development adjacent to I Screen views of garage structures from I-270.

Chapter 6.0 Guiding Principles

5.1 Site Plan Guidelines

COMMUNITY DESIGN. GOAL: Create livable and attractive communities. Intent

D-O LRT Zoning Discussion. Chapel Hill Boards & Commissions October 16, 2017

A Plan for the Heart of the Region: Tukwila, WA

Be it enacted by the Town Board of the Town of Guilderland that the following new A (Transit Oriented Development (TOD) District) is adopted:

3.1 community vision. 3.3 required plan elements

Silverdale Regional Center

13. New Construction. Context & Character

17.11 Establishment of Land Use Districts

Tyvola & Archdale Transit Station Area Plan. June 5, 2008

GUIDELINES. Transit Oriented Development. Approved by Edmonton City Council on February 15, 2012 in tandem with City Policy C565

Lesson 6. Corridor Planning

RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

appendix and street interface guidelines

OPPORTUNITY SITES. A. Introduction. Chapter 5

The transportation system in a community is an

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Sahuarita District & Phase 1 Master Plan. Town Council December 11, 2017

PLAN ON A PAGE SUMMARY

WEST LOOP DESIGN GUIDELINES CHECKLIST

Transit / Housing Oriented Redevelopment

Historic Preservation Preserve, restore or adaptively re-use historic structures and landscapes.

Pattern 3: Parking. Parking in great amounts is not a characteristic of great streets. Allan Jacobs. Community Form and Mobility Principles

III. Design Principles

Developer s Program. The Station at East 54

Living in Albemarle County s Urban Places

CITY OF TARPON SPRINGS DCA#11-1AR

Mark-up of the effect of the proposed Bronte Village Growth Area OPA No.18 on the text of section 24, Bronte Village, of the Livable Oakville Plan

Urban Planning and Land Use

Area Plans. September 18, 2012

The Village. Chapter 3. Mixed Use Development Plan SPECIFIC PLAN

DRAFT Northeast Quadrant of Kipling Avenue and Highway 7 DRAFT AUGUST 29, Goals Land Use. The goals of this Plan are to:

Metro. Activity Center Design Guidelines. Recommendations For Developing Focused, Mixed-Use Commercial/Residential Centers

Section 9 NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN

DRAFT. 10% Common Open Space

Supplemental Design Guidelines

Clairtrell Area Context Plan

THE CITY OF VAUGHAN BY-LAW BY-LAW NUMBER A By-law to adopt Amendment Number 1 to the Official Plan of the Vaughan Planning Area.

Transcription:

PINELLAS COUNTY MPO LIVABLE COMMUNITIES INITIATIVE MODEL LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS

MPO Livable Communities Initiative Goal: Improve the quality of life in Pinellas County by providing diverse, well designed and walkable destinations while creating and maintaining choices in housing, offices, retail, workplaces, and travel. Objective: To provide the county and municipalities model comprehensive plan and land development code language that supports the concept of livable communities.

Background Oct., 2002, MPO appoints Transportation Impact Fee Task Force, renamed Livable Communities Task Force in Jan. 2005, to review Impact Fee Program. March, 2005, MPO approves Task Force recommendations on Impact Fee Ordinance and authorizes follow-up work on development of livable community policies and land development codes. April, 2005, BCC adopts MPO approved amendments to impact fee ordinance. June, 2007, MPO approves livable community comprehensive plan objectives and policies. April, 2008, MPO Technical Coordinating Committee (TCC) approves Model Land Development Code July, 2008, Task Force Approves Model Land Development Code

Four D s of Livable Communities Density Design Diversity Destinations

Concentration of population and activity in an urban area Efficient land use Safety and Security Encourages Physical Activity Neighborhood Preservation Pedestrian-Friendly Density

Diversity Different activities (mixeduse) taking place in same building, street or neighborhood More efficient parking and transport Range of housing types Workforce housing options Jobs-housing balance Reduce need for car Reduce auto emissions

Distinctive identity of a particular place that results from the interaction of many factors built form, landscape, history, people and their activities Sense of place/identity Connectivity Walkable streetscapes Human scale Premium value on housing Design

Economic viability and pedestrian movement depend on existence of worthwhile destinations Pedestrian and bicycle comfort Transit use Economically viable downtowns and town centers Destinations

Model Land Development Code Intended to provide a toolkit for local governments seeking to maintain the character or livability of an area or to change it to a more desirable urban form. Contents Districts and Development Standards Design Standards Optional Standards

Model Land Development Code Districts Urban Core Town Center Neighborhood Center Traditional Neighborhood Suburban Center

Model Land Development Code Design Standards Site Design Principal structures and entrances oriented toward the front of the street Developments must relate to surrounding land uses. Pedestrian and driveway connections to adjacent properties required. Garages oriented toward alleys or side streets and placed behind front façade line of principal structure in Traditional Neighborhood Bus stops in adjacent right-of-way must be improved and integrated into development project

Model Land Development Code Design Standards Building Design Identifiable architectural style Blank facades not permitted In Neighborhood and Suburban Center districts, at least 50 percent of street level facades must be transparent. Pitched roofs or flat roofs with decorative parapet required Traditional neighborhood housing required to include porch, portico or stoop; garages oriented toward alleys or side streets

Model Land Development Code Design Standards Parking Structured parking use identifiable architectural style consistent with existing or planned design of neighboring buildings On street parking standards Surface parking vehicle and bicycle standards based on types of land uses Surface lot requirements providing for safe and comfortable pedestrian movement. Internal sidewalk system required in development projects with multiple buildings

Model Land Development Code Design Standards Parking (cont d) Additional requirements for large parking lots Pedestrian walkways with textured surface Pedestrian connections between parking bays, landscape islands, building and frontage sidewalk Canopy trees for shade Limit parking rows between building and frontage street Limit parking spaces within rows

Model Land Development Code Design Standards Connectivity Cross easements for pedestrians Cross access for vehicles Internal street networks integrated with site design Absence of cul-de-sacs and dead end streets Shared parking lots and driveways

Model Land Development Code Design Standards Signs Freestanding signs designed to complement existing/planned architecture of building Sets maximum sign area and height for signs Sets number of permitted signs

Model Land Development Code Design Standards Public Art Applies to Urban Core and Town Center Districts Applies to projects exceeding 100 thousand square feet Project must allocate 1% of aggregate job value (not to exceed $200 thousand) for public art or Contribute 0.5% of value to public art discretionary fund Coordination with local public art design programs and/or Pinellas County Department of Cultural Affairs

PINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS 2007 - EAR identified changes needed to Comprehensive Plan and LDC to implement livable community land use and street design standards 2008 - EAR-based amendments adopted policies incorporating livable community standards endorsed by MPO 2010 - Objectives and policies for TOD in areas of planned transit stations adopted

Mixed-use Objectives Transit corridors selected through the Pinellas Alternatives Analysis process Served by rail or fixed-guideway transit system Funding must be approved to construct the transit system

Transit Corridors Transit corridors selected through the Pinellas Alternatives Analysis process Served by rail or fixed-guideway transit system Funding must be approved to construct the transit system

Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Located within the Transit Planning Overlay Located within an easy walking distance of transit stations (approx. ½ mile radius around station or 500 acres) Mixed-Use Area Compact and pedestrian-friendly neighborhoods TOD integrates transit with development in the Station Areas and with surrounding neighborhood

TOD Typologies

Downtown Urban Core Station Area Major Regional Destination Density and Intensity Guided by Floor Area Ratios (FARs) in Land Development Regulations Target Building Height 5 stories and above TBARTA and HCCC Planning Commission TBARTA and HCCC Planning Commission

Regional Center Station Area Employment Emphasis Regional Destination 40 60 DU/Acre Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 5.0 Minimum Target FAR 2.5 Target Building Height 4 to 20 stories TBARTA and HCCC Planning Commission TBARTA and HCCC Planning Commission

Regional Center Station Area Mixed-Use Emphasis Regional Destination 40 60 DU/Acre Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 5.0 Minimum Target FAR 2.5 Target Building Height 4 to 20 stories TBARTA and HCCC Planning Commission

Community Center Station Area Subregional or Local Center of Activity 15 40 DU/Acre Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 3.0 Minimum Target FAR 1.5 Target Building Height 2 to 8 stories TBARTA and HCCC Planning Commission TBARTA and HCCC Planning Commission

Neighborhood Center Station Area Local Transit Feeder Station 10 20 DU/Acre Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1.5 Minimum Target FAR 0.5 Target Building Height 1 to 3 stories TBARTA and HCCC Planning Commission

Park and Ride Station Area Station for in-bound commuters 5-15 DU/Acre Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1.0 Minimum Target FAR 0.5 Target Building Height 1 to 3 stories

TOD Principles and Strategies Coordination and Economic Development Use a coordinated multi-agency process to locate transit stations and determine Station Area typologies Coordinate with other affected jurisdictions in developing Station Area Plans Work with neighboring jurisdictions to realize the economic benefits of TOD Consider the County s target industries when planning for Station Areas

TOD Principles and Strategies Land Use Development will be most intense near transit stations There will be a transition between TOD and surrounding lower density development Protect existing stable neighborhoods and historic structures Provide workforce housing

TOD Principles and Strategies Mobility Ped and Bike Make the pedestrian the focus Emphasize the needs of pedestrians and bicyclists www.pedbikeimages.org/austin brown Provide bicycle parking www.pedbikeimages.org/dan burden

TOD Principles and Strategies Mobility Parking Introduce creative parking strategies Discourage large parking lots near transit station (except for park and ride lots) Promote shared parking facilities www.pedbikeimages.org/dan burden

TOD Principles and Strategies Mobility Street Network Design streets to be multi-modal Interconnected street network

TOD Principles and Strategies Community Design Require application of livable community design standards Make safety a key focus Require engaging, high quality public spaces

Establish Two New Future Land Use Map Categories New Categories Transit Oriented Development Category Includes Four Subcategories Transit Oriented Development Overlay Category The new categories will be used in those areas within an easy walking distance of Transit Stations (~ ½ mile) Development will be compatible with the Station Area s Typology

Initiatives Relevant to Implement of Livable Community/TOD Objectives and Policies Pinellas County LDC Update Alternatives Analysis Transportation Task Force Countywide Mobility Plan