PROCESS CHECK Implementing Ordinances planned for adoption with the General Plan:

Similar documents
Remi Mendoza City Planning Academy March 13, 2017

SAN RAFAEL GENERAL PLAN 2040 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW

EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

SONOMA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION

2035 General Plan Update and Belmont Village Specific Plan. Joint Study Session with the City Council and Planning Commission April 12, 2016

PINE CURVE REZONING. BACKGROUND Purchased as two parcels in 2001 and 2002

Endorse the Alameda Point Conceptual Planning Guide

CENTRAL ESTUARY PLAN AVISION FOR OAKLAND S WATERFRONT

Introduction and Overview

ADOPTION OF THE REVISED OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN

Urban Planning and Land Use

PINE CURVE REZONING. Property does not meet criteria for open space preservation and is not a candidate for a park

Municipal Plan*Assessment

Introduction. Chapter 1. Purpose of the Comprehensive Plan Plan Organization Planning Process & Community Input 1-1

NORTH, NORTH REDWOOD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY

Isabel Neighborhood Plan: Alternatives

A. WHAT IS A GENERAL PLAN?

PLAN ELEMENTS WORKSHOP. April 5, 2016

S A C R A M E N T O C O U N T Y JACKSON HIGHWAY & GRANT LINE EAST VISIONING STUDY

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

DRAFT PLAN PRESENTATION

CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation

City Council Special Meeting AGENDA ITEM NO. C.

CPD Rules and Regulations. Arapahoe Square Zoning and Design Standards/Guidelines

Future Land Use SAMPLE RECOMMENDATIONS

Presentation to Town Council in association with Kubilins Transportation Group Rose & Associates Equinox Environmental

Staff Report to the North Ogden City Planning Commission

CITY OF ANN ARBOR MASTER PLAN. Land Use Element

Date: April 10, 2017 City Council Work Session April 24, 2017: Status Report on the Comprehensive Plan Update and Transportation Master Plan

Tyvola & Archdale Transit Station Area Plan. June 5, 2008

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 7. LAND USE AND PLANNING

Chapter 2: Vision, Goals and Strategies

Communities Plan. Parkland-Spanaway-Midland. LUAC Review of Draft Policies

Public input has been an important part of the plan development process.

Unified Development Code (UDC) Revision

CHARLES PUTMAN CHARLES PUTMAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC

Clovis Urban Greening Plan. Community Workshop #2 Northwest

7Page 1 CLEMMONS COMMUNITY COMPASS 1 PLAN OVERVIEW

WAC #7 3/14/14. Coachella General Plan Update

General Plans. Tom Dansie, AICP Steve Pastorik, AICP

Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

Department of Community Development. Planning and Environmental Review Division Revised Notice of Preparation

10 Implementation. Implementation. Responsibility for Implementation. Blueprint for Bloomsburg. Town of Bloomsburg Comprehensive Plan 10-1

A larger version of this map is located on the last page of this PDF.

Tyvola & Archdale Transit Station Area Plan. May 15, 2008

Table L-1 Summary Action Strategy. Action Item Timing Status Responsible Agency

University of the District of Columbia Van Ness Campus Master Plan Community Open House 3. December 8, 2010

CHAPTER 1. Ms. Guajardo s Class - Central Elementary CH 1 1

Status Report: MD 355 Project

Independence Boulevard Area Plan Planning Committee Public Comment May 18, 2010

One said, without a clear understanding of what will be annexed, this is an exercise in futility.

A BLUEPRINT FOR BROCKTON A CITY-WIDE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

TRANSFORM BALTIMORE NEW ZONING CODE

Staff Report and Recommendation

Dignowity Hill Neighborhood Plan & Eastside Reinvestment Plan

JANUARY 19, 2011 CENTRAL AVENUE-METRO BLUE LINE TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT COMMUNITY FORUM

NOTICE OF PREPARATION

Future Proposed Development

Union City General Plan Update. City Council Meeting Item VII.a July 28, 2015 Land Use Concepts and Evaluation Criteria

Town of Peru Comprehensive Plan Executive Summary

Memorandum Planning. Thursday, January 8, 2015

City of Richland Comprehensive Plan: Integrated Non-project Final Environmental Impact Statement

CITY OF PUYALLUP. Background. Development Services

It Takes A Village.. Preserving Rural Character In Standish

AvalonBay Communities + BRIDGE Housing. Mission Housing Habitat for Humanity Pacific Union Development Corporation

CITY OF SACRAMENTO GENERAL PLAN. UC Davis ESP 171 Urban and Regional Planning April 21, 2011

Executive Summary. The Mebane CLP is not a regulatory document, but is intended to guide land development decisions. The plan includes:

Aloha Tomorrow Study (2017)

City Plan Commission Briefing #2

MEMO 1. INTRODUCTION PURPOSE & PROCESS REQUEST

Leonard s Beach Secondary Plan (Alcona North) Official Plan Amendment

Community Workshop November 19, 2014

South Central Connecticut Region Plan of Conservation & Development 2018 Update. Municipal Planners

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT Date: June 2, 2016

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Tables Table UC Davis Park and Open Space Resources

1.0 Purpose of a Secondary Plan for the Masonville Transit Village

RESOLUTION NO. R Refining the route, profile and stations for the Downtown Redmond Link Extension

GENERAL PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

2016 Sustainable Comprehensive Plan Public Hearing

TRANSFORM BALTIMORE NEW ZONING CODE. Laurie Feinberg, Asst. Director

MONTCO 2040: A SHARED VISION The New Comprehensive Plan for Montgomery County. Dra Themes and Goals March, 2014

From: Mayor Sam Liccardo Councilmember Chappie Jones Councilmember Dev Davis Subject: SEE BELOW Date: June 23, 2017

Keyport. Vision for Keyport

Por favor, levanten la mano si necesita traduccion en espanol Please raise your hand if you need Spanish translation

TO: Denver Planning Board FROM: Analiese Hock, Senior City Planner DATE: March 13, 2018 RE:

India Basin/Hunters Point Shoreline Community Workshop May 21, 2008

Kelowna Sustainability Checklist

Key Concepts of the General Plan

South of Eastern Strategic Direction Status Update

City of San Ramon. Zoning Ordinance. Adopted: October 27, Latest Revisions Effective: March 28, 2018

1INTRODUCTION. Purpose of the Truckee Railyard Master Plan

2040 LUP is a part of the Comprehensive Plan and carries the same legal authority. Economic Challenges

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis May 21, 2018

City Center Specific Plan Amendments And Background Report City of Richmond. PLANNING COMMISION FINAL DRAFT January, 2001

Secrest Short Cut and Monroe Expressway Small Area Plan AUGUST 29, 2018

CITY OF UNION CITY MINUTES GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE

3.1 community vision. 3.3 required plan elements

Living in Albemarle County s Urban Places

Plan-It Greenville (2009) Comprehensive Plan 5-Year Update

LAND USE AMENDMENT DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL CORE (WARD 7) MACLEOD TRAIL SE AND 5 AVENUE SE BYLAW 254D2017

Transcription:

PROCESS CHECK

PROCESS CHECK Implementing Ordinances planned for adoption with the General Plan: Urban Growth Boundary extension Northwest Quad zoning Bel Marin Keys Master Plan amendments (biotech campus, ancillary retail allowance, automotive uses in Hamilton Ind. Park as permitted) Hillside/Ridgeline Ordinance (exceptions for houses built prior to ordinance) Downtown (concentration of personal services, prohibition of tobacco retailers, change mandatory reference to design guidelines, terminate specific plan) Woodland Tree Ordinance (prioritize replacement of natives and allowance for fewer but larger replacement trees) Parking lot landscape revisions Beekeeping allowance

NEXT STEPS City Council review and feedback on Draft General Plan Publication of Draft EIR and Planning Commission hearing Planning Commission hearing and recommendations on Final EIR, Draft General Plan and implementing ordinances City Council hearing and decision on Final EIR, Draft General Plan and implementing ordinances April/May July September October

General Plan 2035: Public Participation 7 Open Houses & Farmers Markets 5 Neighborhood Forums 12 Appointed Commissions Input 4 Special District Boards City Council 341 Open Novato 16 Stakeholder Group Dialogues 4 Public Workshops Stakeholder Groups include: Community Groups Environmental Groups Business Groups

PUBLIC OUTREACH Presented the Draft General Plan to 630+ people in 48 meetings/venues Received 284 survey responses (45% response rate)

PUBLIC OUTREACH Organizations/Clubs: Novato Democratic Club Sunrise Rotary A.M Business Women North Marin Breakfast Club Novato Senior Citizen Club Soroptimist International Chamber of Commerce Marin Conservation League Sustainable Novato Novato Human Needs Center Historical Guild Rotary Club of Novato Sierra Club Marin Audubon Downtown Novato Business Association

PUBLIC OUTREACH Advertising: City webpage Novato Advance article Newspaper advertisements Next Door Facebook Hamilton Forum Farmers Market Booth Executive Summary and Displays

1. Senior living opportunities 2. Universal home design for elderly 3. Transportation supporting elderly/disabled 4. Increase Hispanic outreach/participation 5. Improve bike/pedestrian network 6. Maintain/expand parks & trails 7. Access to healthy foods/local food production 8. Active recreation in new developments 9. Retain small town character 10. New development sensitive to surroundings 11. Limit hillside/ridgeline development 12. Retain urban growth boundary 13. Northwest Quad neighborhood rezoning 14. Enforce property maintenance & traffic laws 15. Impact fees for new development 16. High level of police services 17. Maintain existing commercially zoned land 18. Recruit/retain businesses providing local 19. Recruit high-tech/life science firms 20. Assume limited new office/industrial 21. Redevelop N. Redwood for 22. Maintain/improve neighborhood retail 23. Local services & food near neighborhoods 24. Encourage hotels & auto dealerships 25. Downtown as center of the community 26. Pedestrian-oriented downtown development 27. Encourage downtown cafes/retail 28. Downtown public art & gathering places 29. Rezone N. Redwood (Vallejo to Olive) 30. Preserve historic buildings 31. New/widened streets include bike/ped 32. Encourage use of SMART 33. Create SMART bike/ped path 34. Transit improvements 35. Support shift to electric vehicles 36. Support new transportation technologies 37. Maintain traffic levels of service 38. Improve San Marin/Redwood/101 39. Reduce greenhouse gasses 40. Reduce waste/increase recycling 41. Conserve energy and water 42. Expand recycled water system 43. Shift to renewable energy 44. Adopt green building standards 45. Plan for sea level rise, drought, wildfires 46. Focus new development near transit & 47. Encourage walking, biking & transit use 48. Protect open space & wildlife habitat 49. Maintain creek setbacks 50. Protect & restore wetlands 51. Maintain tidal areas in natural state 52. Minimize storm water runoff 53. Protect native trees & woodlands 54. Education & regulations for emergency 55. Emergency planning & training PUBLIC FEEDBACK Summary of General Plan Survey Feedback 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 % Disagree % Agree

PUBLIC FEEDBACK Very High Level of Support for Plan Policies Average Agreement: 81% Average Disagreement: 5%

PUBLIC FEEDBACK Highest Rated Policies (90+% support): Recruit/retain businesses providing local services & high-paying jobs Conserve energy & water Expand recycled water system Encourage downtown cafes & retail Downtown as center of the community Pedestrian-oriented downtown development New development sensitive to its surroundings

PUBLIC FEEDBACK Highest Rated Policies (90+% support): Maintain/expand parks & trails Reduce waste/increase recycling Protect native trees & woodlands Maintain creek setbacks Minimize storm water runoff

PUBLIC FEEDBACK Other Policies Rated as Top Priorities: Improve bicycle & pedestrian infrastructure Provide a high level of police services Promote reinvestment in NW Quad with formbased zoning option Redevelop N. Redwood with vibrant retail/entertainment with public gathering places Encourage use of SMART

PUBLIC FEEDBACK Lowest Rated Policies: Encourage hotels & auto dealerships (23% disagreement, 47% agreement) Assume limited new office & industrial development (14% disagreement, 53% agreement)

COMMISSION & COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION FEEDBACK Feedback from Planning Commission, Design Review Commission, Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Commission, Economic Development Advisory Commission & Recreation, Cultural & Community Services Commission All Commissions commented the Draft Plan is attractive and well-written Feedback from Age-Friendly Novato, MCL, Marin Audubon, Marin Baylands Advocates and Sustainable Novato All suggestions/edits with staff responses in Attachment 8 & edits recommended by staff included in Attachments 9-11

COUNCIL FIRST-PASS EDITS Review monthly in 3-Chapter segments Substantive changes may affect EIR project description and scope Attachments 9-11 include edits recommended by staff from input by Commissions, community organizations & City Councilmembers

COUNCIL FIRST-PASS EDITS First 3 Segments: Introduction Great Places (land use & community design) Draft Downtown Design Guidelines

COUNCIL FIRST-PASS EDITS Suggested Order: Staff Presentation Public Comment Council Questions, Comments and Feedback on selected text, policies and programs: UGB Extension FAR Computation for Structured Parking Great Places Programs LU13a & 19a and Policy CC 3 Selected portions of Introduction, Great Places and Downtown Design Guidelines

COUNCIL FIRST-PASS EDITS Council Objectives: Gain incremental input from public, Commissions and Council prior to drafting Plan Concise, readable, attractive document Utilize much of 1996 General Plan Reflect need for fiscal sustainability in programs

UGB EXTENSION 2014 Council direction: extend UGB in place for another 20 years by Council action UGB Ordinance will be updated by City Attorney for either Council adoption or public ballot with involvement of environmental groups, LAFCO and utility districts Council could place on public ballot in early August. Election cost of ~$50,000-94,000 + CEQA analysis $20,000-40,000 Council will need to adopt a bridge ordinance for November period between expiration of existing UGB and election date

UGB EXTENSION LU 5a: UGB Extension. On or before the expiration of the voter approved Urban Growth boundary, the City Council will consider place on the public ballot extending an extension of the term of the Urban Growth Boundary to improve the City s ability to provide municipal services and discourage urban sprawl and the provision of urban services to property outside the City limits.

FAR CALCULATION Allowable Floor Area Ratio (FAR) downtown is 2.0 (max. building area twice the lot size) Definition of FAR specifically excludes covered parking or garages Councilmember Eklund suggests that a program be included in the Land Use Chapter for staff to disclose total floor area ratio (FAR) for mixed use projects that have structured parking

PUBLIC COMMENT

LU 13a LU 13a: Zoning Regulations. Consider an update to ground floor use regulations to include a provision for uses or buildings that warrant an exception establish limits to avoid overconcentration of certain personal service uses and eliminate tobacco product shops as an allowed use.

LU 19a LU 19a: Rezoning. Rezone and change the General Plan Land Use Map for properties along Redwood Boulevard between Vallejo Avenue and Pinheiro Circle, as identified as Site 1 in Figure GP-7, from General Commercial to Downtown Core.

CC 3 CC 3: Hillsides. Protect Novato s hillsides and ridgelines from erosion, slope failure and visual impacts by limiting the extent and location or new development and ensuring that new development complies with the requirements of the Hillside and Ridgeline Protection ordinance in the Zoning Code.

COUNCIL FIRST-PASS EDITS Selective discussion of text, policies or programs: Introduction Great Places Downtown Design Guidelines