MINNEHAHA. Hiawatha. Strategic. Framework. Community Works. Investment

Similar documents
Corridor Background. Defining the Corridor Study Area. Lake Street. 38th Street. 46th Street

Corridor Vision. 1Pursue Minnehaha-Hiawatha Community Works Project. Mission of Hennepin County Community Works Program

WELCOME! MINNEHAHA-HIAWATHA Community Works Project. 46th Street Area Lighting Project July 2009

Chapter 1: Introduction

Missing Link Study Grand Rounds Parkway Planning and Design Introduction

Elliot Park 2. Neighborhood Master Plan. Historical Perspective

Introduction. Chapter 1. Purpose of the Comprehensive Plan Plan Organization Planning Process & Community Input 1-1

WELCOME TO THE CHOUTEAU GREENWAY EQUITY WORKING GROUP!

3. Endorse the LRT vision in transforming Surrey into Connected-Complete-Livable communities, and more specifically, the official vision statement:

JANUARY 19, 2011 CENTRAL AVENUE-METRO BLUE LINE TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT COMMUNITY FORUM

#27. Timing: Short term. Costs: $$

Southwest Light Rail Transit (LRT) A corridor of opportunity

SCARBOROUGH SUBWAY EXTENSION. Scarborough Subway Extension. Final Terms of Reference

City of Nogales General Plan

Plan Overview. Manhattan Area 2035 Reflections and Progress. Chapter 1: Introduction. Background

WELCOME TO THE CHOUTEAU GREENWAY DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION WORKING GROUP!

North Fair Oaks Community Plan Summary and Information

Hopkins. Development Guidelines May Overview. Sponsored by: Blake Road Corridor Collaborative City of Hopkins

WELCOME TO THE CHOUTEAU GREENWAY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORKING GROUP!

Transit / Housing Oriented Redevelopment

Robbinsdale LRT Station. CDI Development Guidelines. August Overview

Animating the Rideau Canal December 2013

BROOKLYN PARK / 85TH AVE LRT STATION CDI DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES DRAFT

Town of Oakville Streetscape Strategy

Introduction and Overview

Subject: City of Richfield Cedar Avenue Corridor Plan Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Review File No

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

Preliminary Plan Framework: Vision and Goals

MAY 2012 CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA SAINT LOUIS PARK BELTLINE AREA FRAMEWORK & DESIGN GUIDELINES

1.0 Purpose of a Secondary Plan for the Masonville Transit Village

Long Lost Allies? Walking Advocates & Business District Organizations. Matt Kazinka Lake Street Council. Shaina Brassard Seward Redesign

St. Louis Park Wooddale LRT Station Site development guidelines

1 October Dear Citizens of Charlotte and Mecklenburg County,

4- PA - LD - LIVELY DOWNTOWN. LD - Background

IMPLEMENTING SOMERSET COUNTY S INVESTMENT FRAMEWORK

Plano Tomorrow Vision and Policies

Infrastructure Engineering Planning Construction Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN Tel: Fax:

ROBBINSDALE LRT STATION CDI DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES

2030 Comprehensive Plan VISION STATEMENT

2040 LUP is a part of the Comprehensive Plan and carries the same legal authority. Economic Challenges

MOBILITY HUB GUIDELINES 2012 TAC Sustainable Urban Transportation Award Submission BACKGROUND MOBILITY HUB GUIDELINES

Atlanta BeltLine. Subareas 9 & 10. Master Plan Updates. March 26, Washington Park Jamboree 1

Urban Design Manual PLANNING AROUND RAPID TRANSIT STATIONS (PARTS) Introduction. Station Study Areas

Port Credit Local Advisory Panel October 20 th Meeting

Urban Planning and Land Use

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

FUNDING CORRIDOR REVITALIZATION

Official Plan Review

Implementation Guide Comprehensive Plan City of Allen

Mendota-Lebanon Hills Greenway Master Plan Executive Summary. August draft for more information visit

Potential Funding Sources: Mn DNR Local Trail Connections Grant City of Minneapolis CIP Hennepin County CIP

Midtown Greenway Land Use and Development Plan Executive Summary

Atlanta BeltLine, Inc. Pathways to Urban Sustainability

Mississippi Skyway Preliminary Engineering Report

ELK GROVE GENERAL PLAN VISION

1 Introduction. Chapter. In this chapter:

Visioning Statement and Guiding Principles

DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW. Game Plan for a Healthy City

A BLUEPRINT FOR BROCKTON A CITY-WIDE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Concord Community Reuse Project Goals and Guiding Principles. Overarching Goals (OG)

hermitage town center

Port Lavaca Future Land Use

CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation

Comprehensive Plan. Faribault, Minnesota. Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. Claybaugh Preservation Architecture Inc. Howard R. Green Company Bonz/REA

NEW REGIONAL OFFICIAL PLAN HIGH LEVEL PROCESS & FRAMEWORK

Blueprint Denver A BLUEPRINT FOR AN INCLUSIVE CITY. Executive Summary

Rails to Real Estate. Development Patterns along Three New Transit Lines

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 TH 14 WEST STUDY AREA Project Description Functional Classification Purpose of the Project

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 15, 2016

From Partnership to Reality

Planning for TOD Implementation at a Corridor Scale

Contact: Alex Taranu ( ) or Karl Walsh ( )

CONTEXT: the Highway, the River + the Railroads run through us.

M E M O R A N D U M SITE DATA

SAN RAFAEL GENERAL PLAN 2040 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW

Chapter 1.0 Introduction

Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee

Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan

Ivywild On The Creek PRELIMINARY CREEK DISTRICT MASTER PLAN

Atlanta BeltLine Corridor Environmental Study. Scoping Meeting August 2008

Midtown Greenway PROJECT REPORT CARD

The Corporation of the Town of Milton

38 Queen s University Campus Master Plan Part 1

DRAFT Subject to Modifications

GAINING LEVERAGE through

Goals and Action Items

RESOLUTION NO. R Refining the route, profile and stations for the Downtown Redmond Link Extension

TOD 101 CREATING LIVABLE COMMUNITIES WITH TRANSIT

Welcome. Walk Around. Talk to Us. Write Down Your Comments

iii. Visioning framework

PSRC REVIEW REPORT & CERTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION

A community driven catalyst for an equitable, healthy, (economically viable and environmentally) sustainable corridor

Welcome to the Oakridge Centre Open House

3. VISION AND GOALS. Vision Statement. Goals, Objectives and Policies

Coliseum Station Area Area Redevelopment Plan. Public Engagement #1 June 12, 2017

Mark-up of the effect of the proposed Bronte Village Growth Area OPA No.18 on the text of section 24, Bronte Village, of the Livable Oakville Plan

Prepared for the Citizens of Forsyth County by the City-County Planning Board

7Page 1 CLEMMONS COMMUNITY COMPASS 1 PLAN OVERVIEW

Midtown Corridor Transitway Alternatives Analysis 11/30/12 PAC Meeting Notes & Visioning Exercise Summary. Prepared by the SRF Consulting Group Team

2015 SYSTEM STATEMENT. System Statement Issue Date:

Transcription:

Strategic Investment Framework MINNEHAHA Hiawatha Community Works A partnership and unity between County, City, Neighborhoods and Community Project Partners Hennepin County City of Minneapolis Neighborhood Organizations Longfellow Community Council (LCC) Standish-Ericsson Neighborhood Association (SENA) Corcoran Neighborhood Organization (CNO) Longfellow Business Association (LBA) Metro Transit MnDOT May 2011

MINNEHAHA Hiawatha Strategic Investment Framework Prepared for: Hennepin County Community Works Prepared by: Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. IBI Group Emmons and Olivier Resources Inc. EcoDEEP Carroll Franck & Associates in association with McComb Group Ltd. Geomatrix Landscape Research May 2011

Table of Contents Acknowledgements i Overview 1 Chapter 1: Corridor Background 7 Defining the Corridor Study Area 7 Understanding the Corridor s Origins 8 Leveraging the Corridor s Planned Growth 8 Establishing Neighborhood Livability Elements 10 Identifying the Corridor s Partner Jurisdictions 13 Summary of Corridor Issues 15 Chapter 2: Livable Corridor Vision & Strategies 19 Livable Corridor Vision 19 Corridor Livability Strategies, Evaluation Criteria & Metrics 21 Mobility Strategies 22 Land Use and Physical Resources Strategies 24 Environment and Natural Resources Strategies 26 Economic Development Strategies 28 Social, Cultural and Heritage Strategies 30 Chapter 3: Minnehaha-Hiawatha Diagonal Concept 45 Unique Sense of Place 45 Future Minnehaha-Hiawatha Diagonal 45 The Diagonal Avenues 45 The Rung Streets 48 Three Diagonal Districts 54 Chapter 4: Projects 57 Introduction 57 Projects List 58 Identifiying, Prioritizing, Coordinating Projects 62 Corridor-wide Projects 66 Minnehaha Avenue Projects 110 Hiawatha Avenue Projects 122 Freight Rail Corridor Projects 130 Lake Street Diagonal District Projects 134 38th Street Diagonal District Projects 148 46th Street Diagonal District Projects 158 Corridor Livability Metrics 32 May 2011 Table of Contents

Minnehaha-Hiawatha Community Works Strategic Investment Framework In April 2008 Hennepin County Community Works launched a two-year process to develop a Strategic Investment Framework for the Minnehaha-Hiawatha Corridor to guide County, City and other revitalization investments. The investment recommendations outlined in this framework document are community driven and based on a close collaboration among all stakeholders. A Community Advisory Committee (CAC) served as stewards of the community involvement process and worked directly with a consulting team hired to lead this program. A Technical Advisory Team (TAC) comprised of agency staff from many disciplines provided expert guidance and resource information throughout the process as well. The following are the key values and components of the project. Project Values and Components We listened to the community and respected all opinions and ideas. Community Input gathered perspectives and guidance from stakeholders through neighborhood listening sessions and other activities, supported by the Community Advisory Committee. Corridor Issues emerged from community input and existing corridor plans and data. A Corridor Strategic Investment Framework was developed in partnership with stakeholders, the County, and the City, to reflect community priorities for a unique and valued sense of place. An Implementation Strategy defines how to leverage strategic investments in the corridor area to address issues and optimize revitalization opportunities. The Framework is realistic in the strategies and projects it envisions and forward looking, recognizing the long term nature of project implementation. Hennepin County Community Works investments are based on the following principles: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Strengthen communities through connections Maintain and improve natural systems Build bridges for effective planning and implementation Stimulate economic development Enhance the tax base Hennepin County Community Works Staff Patrick Connoy - Division Manager Robb Luckow - Project Manager Community Advisory Committee Members Jamie Buss - Council Member Schiff Judy Corrao - Council Member Colvin Roy Steve Krause - Longfellow Business Association Ed Leaf - Longfellow Community Council Lisa Middag - Commissioner McLaughlin Sam Newberg - Standish-Ericsson Neighborhood Association Karl Stoerzinger - Corcoran Neighborhood Organization Dan Swenson - Longfellow Business Association Greg Toltzman - Longfellow Community Council Technical Advisory Committee Members Patrick Connoy - Hennepin HCWT John Dillery - Metro Transit Anna Flintoft - Minneapolis Public Works, Transportation Planner Mark Garner - Minneapolis Planning, business development with focus on transit corridors Peter Lemke - Hennepin County, Transportation Paul Mogush - Minneapolis Planning, community/long-range planning John Griffith - Minnesota Dept of Transportation, Metro District, West Area Manager Joel Settles - Hennepin County, Environmental Services Acknowledgements - Page i

A birds eye view of the corridor looking north from Minnehaha Parkway towards downtown Minneapolis. Source: Image: Regents of the University of Minnesota

Overview Minnehaha-Hiawatha Community Works Project In 2008, the Minnehaha-Hiawatha Community Works project initiated a partnership among Hennepin County, the City of Minneapolis, Metro Transit, MnDOT, and neighborhood/ business organizations to define strategies for coordinated future public and private reinvestments in the MinnehahaHiawatha diagonal corridor and to establish a means for measuring the change and progress. The Minnehaha-Hiawatha corridor is defined as the general area bounded by Minnehaha Avenue (CSAH 48) to the east, Hiawatha Avenue (MN Hwy 55) and the Hiawatha LRT line to the west, the Midtown Greenway to the north, and Minnehaha Park & Falls/ Grand Rounds to the south. Overview - Page 1

38th Street LRT station One of the many pedestrian bridge over Minnehaha Creek The Minnehaha-Hiawatha corridor possesses a unique sense of place and identity as an important historic and present-day connector corridor for Minneapolis and the Twin Cities region. The corridor s diagonal orientation within the Minneapolis street grid makes it unique and memorable as a place. The Minnehaha-Hiawatha corridor is physically defined by its pattern of diagonal avenues, including Minnehaha (CSAH 48), Hiawatha (MN 55), Snelling, and Dight, as well as a freight rail line that preceded the dominant Minneapolis street grid of north-south avenues and east-west streets, which now surrounds the Minnehaha-Hiawatha corridor. The Hiawatha LRT line, which was completed in 2004, reinforces the diagonal character of the corridor. This diagonal orientation also creates unique blocks, including triangles, street intersections, and houses with unique street orientations. The Minnehaha-Hiawatha corridor also serves as an important transportation link between the urban core of downtown Minneapolis and several key destinations to the southeast, including Minnehaha Park & Falls, Historic Fort Snelling, Fort Snelling State Park, Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport, and the city of St. Paul (via 46th Street/CSAH 46). With its broad mix of residential, commercial, industrial, and transportation land uses, the corridor also functions as the main link between neighborhoods both north-south and east-west, which are predominately lower density residential. In 2004, the Hiawatha LRT line was completed on the west side of the corridor as the first LRT line in the state, connecting downtown Minneapolis to the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport, the Mall of America, and the city of Bloomington. Three Hiawatha LRT stations are located within the corridor at Lake Street/Midtown, 38th Street, and 46th Street. This major investment by the County, City, Region and State has been a catalyst for some major reinvestments in the Minnehaha-Hiawatha corridor since that time, however, the potential for significantly more reinvestment still exists, particularly, east of the LRT line. In 2006, the Longfellow Community Council (LCC) initiated a request for the creation of a Hennepin County Community Works project in the Minnehaha-Hiawatha corridor. The County subsequently met with LCC and the other neighborhood organizations along the corridor to define the project. The County established the Minnehaha- Hiawatha Community Works project in late 2006 with resolutions of support adopted by the City of Minneapolis and LCC in 2007. Although a number of plans (small area/station area plans, street plans) already exist for various portions of the Minnehaha-Hiawatha corridor, none of them encompass the entire corridor and most of them do not address all the elements of community livability. The Minnehaha-Hiawatha Community Works project s purpose is to establish a coordinated reinvestment guide for the entire corridor that is based on locally-driven community and partnership-based strategies and projects. This large-scale corridor planning effort falls in between the scale of citywide plans and small area plans, involving seven (7) neighborhoods and three (3) Hiawatha LRT station areas. This project approaches community livability and reinvestment based on five (5) general elements: Mobility Land use & physical resources Environment & natural resources Economic development Social/cultural/heritage. Lake Street and Minnehaha Avenue commercial district Page 2 - Overview

The Minnehaha-Hiawatha Community Works project to establish a Strategic Investment Framework began in 2008 with an extensive series of community input forums and a number of coordinated technical studies focused on better understanding the corridor s issues and opportunities for revitalization. The project s outcomes encompass three components: I. Baseline Data Inventory - compilation of a comprehensive baseline data inventory based on previous plans and adds new information from current studies as appropriate; II. III. Issues & Priorities - identification of the corridor s key issues and priorities; and Strategic Investment Framework - creation of a future corridor concept, neighborhood livability elements, revitalization strategies, and key projects for implementing short, medium and long-term improvements. Purpose of Strategic Investment Framework This report, which is a Strategic Investment Framework for the corridor, comprises the third component of the project and establishes the preferred future corridor concept, neighborhood livability elements, reinvestment strategies, and priority projects to guide future improvements and investments. Creation of this Framework was centered around collaboration among neighborhood organizations, City departments, County departments, regional/metro agencies, state and federal agencies, railroad companies, public utility companies, private property owners, and developers. These partners represent vehicle, transit, bike, walk, freight and railroad transportation; land use and housing development; environmental management; parks and recreation; economic development (jobs, taxes, property values/investment); and local social, demographic, cultural and heritage concerns. The Framework also describes a future vision of the corridor as the Minnehaha- Hiawatha Diagonal or a diagonal ladder consisting of three (3) connected diagonal districts : the Lake Street, 38th Street, and 46th Street diagonal districts. These unique diagonal districts are centered around the key rung streets that connect the two corridor diagonals - Minnehaha Avenue (CSAH 48) and Hiawatha Avenue (MN 55)/LRT line. The diagonal ladder metaphor for the corridor is intended to visually convey the need for the diagonal avenues and rail lines to be strongly linked with the key eastwest rung streets. The Strategic Investment Framework shares similar principles and objectives as The Partnership for Sustainable Communities. This partnership was created by the Federal Government (HUD, EPA and DOT) in 2009 to coordinate federal housing, transportation, and other infrastructure investments to protect the environment, promote equitable development, and help to address the challenges of climate change. The partnership embraces the following key principles: provide more transportation choices promote equitable affordable housing enhance economic competitiveness support existing communities coordinate and leverage federal policies and investment value neighborhoods and communities. (see www.epa. gov/smartgrowth/partnership/ index.html) This document is organized into the following chapters: Chapter One provides an historical background and introduction to the corridor study area and key initiatives at the neighborhood, city, region or state level that are relevant to revitalization of the corridor. Chapter Two defines the corridor s neighborhood livability elements, values, longterm revitalization strategies, and project evaluation criteria. Chapter Three describes recommended projects for improving and reinvesting in the corridor. Many of the recommended projects are place-oriented so they are organized by the major rung streets and diagonal districts that define the overall corridor. Chapter Four presents the Minnehaha-Hiawatha Diagonal and three diagonal districts concept as the organizing structure for the corridor s future revitalization. Overview - Page 3

NAVIGATING the DOCUMENT: MINNEHAHA-HIAWATHA Strategic Investment Framework 0. Overview Purpose of the document, who, what, where, when 1. Corridor Background 2. Livable Corridor Vision and Strategies 3. Diagonal Concept Defining the Corridor Study Area Understanding the Corridor s Origins Leveraging the Corridor s Future Growth Establishing Neighborhood Livability Elements Identifying the Corridor s Partner Jurisdictions Summary of Corridor Issues Neighborhood Livability Mobility Strategies Land Use & Physical Resources Strategies Environmental & Natural Resources Strategies Economic Development Strategies Social, Cultural and Heritage Strategies Livability Metrics The Ladder of Diagonal Neighborhood Districts The Diagonals The Rungs 4. Projects Descriptions Coordinated Projects Funding Lead Agencies Metrics Prioritizing Projects Page 4 - Overview

Overview - Page 5