LAND USE AMENDMENT DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL CORE (WARD 7) MACLEOD TRAIL SE AND 5 AVENUE SE BYLAW 254D2017

Similar documents
Land Use Amendment in Southwood (Ward 11) at and Elbow Drive SW, LOC

ROAD CLOSURE AND LAND USE AMENDMENT SILVER SPRINGS (WARD 1) NORTHEAST OF NOSEHILL DRIVE NW AND SILVER SPRINGS ROAD NW BYLAWS 2C2018 AND 29D2018

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2018 January 25. That Calgary Planning Commission recommend APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 June 15. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

LAND USE AMENDMENT CORNERSTONE (WARD 3) 60 STREET NE AND COUNTRY HILLS BOULEVARD NE MAP 26NE BYLAW 22D2017

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2016 November 03. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

POLICY AMENDMENT AND LAND USE AMENDMENT TUXEDO PARK (WARD 9) CENTRE STREET N AND 26 AVENUE NE BYLAWS 36P2017 AND 234D2017

POLICY AMENDMENT AND LAND USE AMENDMENT KILLARNEY/GLENGARRY (WARD 8) NW CORNER OF RICHMOND ROAD AND 33 STREET SW BYLAWS 1P2015 AND 7D2015

This application has been applied for with support of an Outline Plan to provide the technical details for the site s development.

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION 2016 November 03. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

LAND USE AMENDMENT CORNERSTONE (WARD 3) COUNTRY HILLS BOULEVARD AND STONEY TRAIL NE BYLAW 9D2017

An amendment to the Bridgeland-Riverside Area Redevelopment Plan is required to allow for the proposed redesignation.

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 February 09. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

Welcome to the Oakridge Centre Open House

Outline Plan in Belvedere (Ward 9) at Street SE, LOC (OP)

Welcome. Walk Around. Talk to Us. Write Down Your Comments

Local Growth Planning in North Central Green Line Communities

178 Carruthers Properties Inc.

1.0 Purpose of a Secondary Plan for the Masonville Transit Village

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

QUEEN-RIVER SECONDARY PLAN

STRATHEARN HEIGHTS APARTMENTS PARKLAND IMPACT ASSESSMENT

Regency Developments. Urban Design Brief. Holyrood DC2 Rezoning

ELMVALE ACRES SHOPPING CENTRE MASTER PLAN

SECTION ONE: INTRODUCTION. introduction

Staff Report to the North Ogden City Planning Commission

SUBJECT: Waterfront Hotel Planning Study Update TO: Planning and Development Committee FROM: Department of City Building. Recommendation: Purpose:

Public Open House. Overview of the Downtown Plan Official Plan Amendment April 23, 2018

STAFF REPORT TO COUNCIL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT

Date: April 10, 2017 City Council Work Session April 24, 2017: Status Report on the Comprehensive Plan Update and Transportation Master Plan

Implementation Guide Comprehensive Plan City of Allen

South Macleod Centre. Area Structure Plan

Staff Report and Recommendation

PRIMARILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT VISION TOWER 4 TOWER 2 TOWER 1 TOWER 5

Urban Design Brief December 23, 2015 Southside Construction Group Official Plan & Zoning By-Law Amendment

Plan Framework Report. Attachment A

This Review Is Divided Into Two Phases:

JASPER PLACE. Area Redevelopment Plan

The Master Plan Framework

hermitage town center

REQUEST Current Zoning: O-15(CD) (office) Proposed Zoning: TOD-M(CD) (transit oriented development mixed-use, conditional)

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF. 2136&2148 Trafalgar Road. Town of Oakville

RE-Imagining the Downtown Colorado Springs Master Plan

City Council Special Meeting AGENDA ITEM NO. C.

Complete Neighbourhood Guidelines Review Tool

Minto In Kensington Open House. Thursday March 23, pm Hillhurst Sunnyside Community Association Ave NW

John M. Fleming Managing Director, Planning and City Planner. Old East Village Dundas Street Corridor Secondary Plan Draft Terms of Reference

City of Farmington. Downtown Plan. Amendment to the 1998 Master Plan Adopted October 11, 2004

City Center Specific Plan Amendments And Background Report City of Richmond. PLANNING COMMISION FINAL DRAFT January, 2001

OP Council Resolution June 16, Planning and Development Services

North Oakville East Parks Facilities Distribution Plan. November, 2009

Community Information Meeting

CDAC. Update: Downtown Dartmouth Update: CDAC July 25 th Motion

appendix and street interface guidelines

CITY OF PUYALLUP. Background. Development Services

Official Plan Review: Draft Built Form Policies

PINE CURVE REZONING. BACKGROUND Purchased as two parcels in 2001 and 2002

Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center

The Corporation of the TOWN OF MILTON

[PLANNING RATIONALE] For Site Plan Control and Lifting of Holding Zone By-Law 101 Champagne Avenue. May 23, 2014

Arbour Lake Development Application

PORT WHITBY COMMUNITY

Plan Overview. Manhattan Area 2035 Reflections and Progress. Chapter 1: Introduction. Background

CONTENTS 8.0 LAND USE 8.1 GENERAL LAND USE 8.2 RESIDENTIAL 8.3 MIXED USE 8.4 COMMERCIAL 8.5 EMPLOYMENT LANDS

March 21, 2018 ALCA Meeting. March 21, 2018

1 INTRODUCTION Purpose Project Background PROJECT CONTEXT Background The Capital City Downtown Plan...

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 721 FRANKLIN BLVD, CAMBRIDGE August 2018

Bank Street Secondary Plan

Chapter 10 IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS

JANUARY 19, 2011 CENTRAL AVENUE-METRO BLUE LINE TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT COMMUNITY FORUM

Mill Woods Town Centre Proposed Rezoning LDA

PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE HURONTARIO-MAIN CORRIDOR SECONDARY PLAN

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF OAKVILLE BY-LAW NUMBER

17.11 Establishment of Land Use Districts

30 and 44 Zorra Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Westbound: A One-day Exploration of Growth

2655 Lawrence Ave East - Rezoning Application - Preliminary Report

EXHIBIT A. Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 1 (Town Center) First Amended Project Plan 1

NORTHEAST RIVER CROSSING FUNCTIONAL PLANNING STUDY

MOUNT BAKER TOWN CENTER: THE 2014 REZONE AND TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT. By Talis Abolins

AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN THE WAY WE GROW

5 TOWN OF MARKHAM OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 144 MILLIKEN MAIN STREET SECONDARY PLAN

LIST OF TABLES, FIGURES AND APPENDICES

A General Summary of Land Use Zones 1

GATEWAY AREA STRUCTURE PLAN

City of Grande Prairie Development Services Department

DEFINED VILLAGE CENTRES & NEIGHBOURHOODS

Edmonton Design Committee Formal Submission: Rezoning October 16, ICE District Tower Lighting AED Zone Amendment

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Date: April 5, 2018

City of Welland Commercial Policies. Public Information Centre March 25 th, 2009

Tyvola & Archdale Transit Station Area Plan. June 5, 2008

Lehigh Acres Land Development Regulations Community Planning Project

Workshop 3. City of Burlington Waterfront Hotel Planning Study. September 14, The Planning Partnership

ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts

ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD

Uptown Rideau Street Secondary Plan [Amendment #166, January 12, 2016]

Commercial Development Proposal Tenth Line Road. Planning Rationale Report. Minto Developments Inc.

Introduction. Intent of the Plan. Urban Design and Land Use Approach

Cobb County Design Guidelines Mableton Parkway & Veterans Memorial Highway Community Design Workshop January 12, 2017

Transcription:

Page 1 of 10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Land Use Amendment application seeks to redesignate a full downtown block (currently the YWCA site) from a Direct Control based on the CM-2 District (Land Use Bylaw 2P80) to a Commercial Residential District (CR20-C20/R20). This is to improve and update the density bonus system, revise development regulations to be more consistent with current City policies, and achieve better alignment with Land Use Bylaw 1P2007. PREVIOUS COUNCIL DIRECTION None. ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 June 15 That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment. RECOMMENDATION(S) OF THE That Council hold a Public Hearing on Bylaw 254D2017; and 1. ADOPT the proposed redesignation of 1.15 hectares ± (2.84 acres ±) located at 320 5 Avenue SE (Plan 7275JK, Block 20) from DC Direct Control District to Commercial Residential District (CR20-C20/R20), in accordance with Administration s recommendation; and 2. Give three readings to the proposed Bylaw 254D2017. REASON(S) FOR RECOMMENDATION: The proposed Commercial Residential District (CR20-C20/R20) is intended to be characterized by developments that contribute to the downtown s role as the predominant destination for business, retail, entertainment and cultural activities in the city. As identified in the Transition Area (Map 11, LUB1P2007), intensive high density developments with a mix of commercial, residential and cultural uses will transition uses and building forms to the surrounding neighborhoods. The proposed land use designation permits a form of development that is supported by new Centre City policies while ensuring sensitivity to the transitioning context of the surrounding neighbourhoods. ATTACHMENT 1. Proposed Bylaw 254D2017

Page 2 of 10 LOCATION MAPS

Page 3 of 10 ADMINISTRATIONS RECOMMENDATION TO Recommend that Council ADOPT, by bylaw, the proposed redesignation of 1.15 hectares ± (2.84 acres ±) located at 320 5 Avenue SE (Plan 7275JK, Block 20) from DC Direct Control District to Commercial Residential District (CR20-C20/R20). Moved by: G.-C. Carra Carried: 6 0 Absent: L. Juan

Page 4 of 10 Applicant: Madeleine King Landowner: GGCY Calgary Limited PLANNING EVALUATION SITE CONTEXT The YWCA site is in the north east corner of the downtown district. It acts as the entrance into the central business district from the north and east on 4 Avenue from Memorial Drive SE and Edmonton Trail. Inversely it also holds a prominent exit point from downtown on 5 Avenue SE. The Centre City Plan also indicates that the Downtown Edge should be sensitively planned and designed to fit the surrounding Centre City neighbourhoods which on this site borders East Village and Chinatown. The Commercial Residential District was brought to Council at the 2013 September 09 Public Hearing. At the time, Administration brought a land use redesignation for the majority of downtown Calgary to CR20-C20/R20. This site was excluded at the request of the YWCA directors citing uncertainty with the future of its facility just after the 2013 flood. The site is also within the Rivers District Community Revitalization Plan. This plan identifies the area as requiring infrastructure upgrades and replacement to address aging infrastructure, floodplain requirements and to support redevelopment. Infrastructure improvements will increase the capacity of utilities, provide flood protection and improve the pedestrian environment. Public realm improvements will encourage investment in the area and attract new residents to the Rivers District. LAND USE DISTRICTS The Commercial Residential District CR20-C20/R20 is a modernization of the old CM-2 district of Land Use Bylaw 2P80. It offers a wider range of uses and many of the rules including the incentive density system have been updated. New rules for transition areas and built form have been added. Residential parking requirements are more flexible and bicycle stalls are now required. Downtown land use districts do not have maximum building heights. Building heights will be limited by the district s sunlight protection rule, which protects a 20 metre wide area along the riverbank from shadows cast by tall buildings measured between 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. (mountain daylight time) on September 21. For a comparison table between the CM-2 district and the proposed Commercial Residential Downtown District, see APPENDIX II.

Page 5 of 10 LEGISLATION & POLICY Calgary Municipal Development Plan The proposed redevelopment site is located within the Centre City s Downtown core. The Centre City is the business and cultural heart of the city, the pre-eminent mixed-use area. It is made up of diverse and unique neighbourhoods focused around the Downtown. It has the highest concentration of office developments and offers the broadest variety of cultural activities. Developing high-density, mixed-use residential will reinforce the Centre City as the focus of business, employment, cultural, recreation, retail and high density housing within Calgary. The site is also located in the flood fringe. Developments located within flood hazard areas are subject to flood proofing and building design requirements. Centre City Plan The Centre City Plan identifies an area of transition between the Downtown commercial core and the surrounding neighbourhoods. The proposed redevelopment site is located within this transition area and will be subject to its policies. The policies focus on improving connectivity by creating a walkable, high quality public realm and ensuring that the mix of uses are compatible and designed in a way that is sensitive to the objectives of the Downtown and adjacent neighbourhoods. Civic District Public Realm Strategy The Civic District Public Realm Strategy identifies an area of the Centre City where coordinated efforts are being made to improve the public space around City Hall, Olympic Plaza and the new Central Library. A number of streetscapes have been identified for improvement, including the Ceremonial Boulevard, Third Street SE (Zipper) and Civic Gateway. The Ceremonial Boulevard links several iconic elements of Calgary s geographical and cultural landscape, as well as defining Macleod Trail SE as a gateway into Calgary s downtown. Third Street SE (Zipper) marks the transition between the East Village and the Civic District. It will bind and connect these two areas together. The Fourth and Fifth Avenue SE fly-overs aspire for an iconic, welcoming, memorable Gateway connecting the Centre City to the rest of the City. Specific to the YWCA site, it supports the redevelopment with the opportunity to increase the density of the site, animate the street with active building frontage and promote a use which contributes to the vibrancy of the Civic District. South Saskatchewan Regional Plan (SSRP) The recommendation by Administration in this report has considered and is aligned with the policy direction of the South Saskatchewan Regional Plan (SSRP).

Page 6 of 10 Subdivision If this site is to be subdivided in the future, a 10 percent Municipal Reserve obligation of 0.1148 hectare will be required. At this time, the applicant intends to pay cash-in-lieu of reserve dedication. TRANSPORTATION NETWORKS The proposed redevelopment site is bordered to the north by 4 Avenue SE and to the south by 5 Avenue SE. Both avenues are classified as arterial roads and service approximately 69,000 vehicles per day combined. The traffic volume split between the two roads is fairly even. The proposed redevelopment site is bordered to the west by Macleod Trail SE and to the east by 3 Street SE. Both roads are classified as Urban Boulevard. Macleod Trail SE has traffic volumes which transition from 23,000 vehicles per day to 4,000 vehicles per day from 5 Avenue SW to Riverfront Avenue SE. 3 Street SE has traffic volumes of approximately 3,000 vehicles per day bordering the site. Macleod Trail SE is also identified as a Pedestrian Corridor in the Centre City Mobility Plan. A Transportation Impact Assessment will be required at the Development Permit stage. Management of flexible parking allocation, and any proposed bylaw parking relaxations, will be reviewed with a Parking Study at the time of the Development Permit. The site is within the +15 area boundary and will be subject to the +15 skywalk policy requirements. At the Development Permit stage, vehicular access to the subject site shall be carefully considered as 4 Avenue SE and 5 Avenue SE are signed to restrict stopping and parking to optimize AM and PM traffic operations entering and exiting the downtown core. Site access and loading will be analysed at the Development Permit stage to ensure that these roadways continue to operate to the satisfaction of Transportation Planning. UTILITIES & SERVICING Public water, sanitary and storm mains exist within the adjacent public right-of-way for future development servicing purposes. Development servicing will be determined at the future Development Permit (DP) and Development Site Servicing Plan (DSSP) circulation stages, to the satisfaction of Water Resources.

Page 7 of 10 ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Environmental and Safety Management confirms that there are no concerns regarding the proposed land use amendment. Prior to the approval of the future Development Permit, the applicant must submit a current Remedial Action Plan and/or a Risk Management Plan, which shall document how the site will be remediated and/or risk managed to such an extent that the site will be suitable for such future development scope. This will be necessary given the concerns related to the former onsite drycleaner use, while also accounting for historical industrial activities in the East Village Area which has resulted in widespread soil and groundwater impacts. Important to note that an overarching risk management plan was previously developed for the East Village area and will be provided at the Development Permit stage. The subject lands are located within the current "Flood Fringe" flood risk zone, as per current Council approved flood maps. As such, the future development scope will be subject to current flood regulations applicable to the lands. ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY Not applicable in connection with this Land Use Amendment. GROWTH MANAGEMENT The proposed amendment does not trigger capital infrastructure investment and therefore there are no growth management concerns at this time. PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT Community Association Comments The Calgary Downtown Association responded with No Objection. This application was also circulated to the East Village Neighbourhood Association, Chinatown BRZ and Calgary Chinatown Community Association. No comment was received by CPC Report submission date. Citizen Comments One online feedback was received. The concern was height as it would affect views from the adjacent residential building.

Page 8 of 10 Public Meetings A public information session was held on 2017 May 10. No issues or concerns were raised in the various conversations.

Page 9 of 10 APPENDIX I APPLICANT S SUBMISSION Land Use Rezoning Application Site Address: 320 5 th Avenue SE Calgary Legal Description: Plan 7275JK Block 20 Reasons for making this application The current zoning is a Direct Control based on the now repealed 2P80 Bylaw. We understand that The City would have re-zoned the parcel CR20 along with the surrounding parcels but for a request from the then owner, the YWCA, to retain the former zoning. The Applicant is intending to develop the site and therefore wishes to have the zoning compatible with The City's current Bylaw. Since the site lies between the commercial heart of the downtown and the growing community of East Village and between the Bow Valley campus and the Bow River, it is proposed to develop the site with four mixed use floors and four residential towers. The heights of the towers (and resulting density) are determined by the need to prevent shadowing of the river pathway. The site will also encompass some very significant public open space encouraging through-traffic and a sense of community. The initial development proposal has been shared at pre-application meetings of CPAG, the Urban Design Review Panel and Planning Commission. In the circumstances it is believed that CR20 is the appropriate land use zone for this site, and the Applicant respectfully requests this land use redesignation application be granted.

Page 10 of 10 APPENDIX II The table below summarizes some of the similarities and differences between the old CM-2 district and the proposed new CR20-C20/R20 downtown district.