COMMUNITY MEETING #1 AUGUST, 2017

Similar documents
A BLUEPRINT FOR BROCKTON A CITY-WIDE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW. Game Plan for a Healthy City

ELK GROVE GENERAL PLAN VISION

Public Meeting & Workshop 1 April 26,2016

1 ESRI User Conference Eastside Greenway

Toronto Parks Renaissance Strategy

SAN RAFAEL GENERAL PLAN 2040 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW

PLAN ELEMENTS WORKSHOP. April 5, 2016

IMPLEMENTING SOMERSET COUNTY S INVESTMENT FRAMEWORK

Preliminary Plan Framework: Vision and Goals

Northeast Ohio Areawide Coordinating Agency. Regional TOD Scorecard and Implementation Plan. July 28, 2016

North Fair Oaks Community Plan Summary and Information

Chapter 1: Introduction

FUNDING CORRIDOR REVITALIZATION

BeltLine Corridor Environmental Study

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

Sustainability, Health, Safety, Recreation & Open Space Working Group August 3, 2017

WAC #7 3/14/14. Coachella General Plan Update

Atlanta BeltLine Corridor Environmental Study. Scoping Meeting August 2008

Whitemarsh Comprehensive Plan Update: Housing & Land Use. Public Workshop #3: September 20, 2018

Portage County Parks, Trails and Greenways Plan

WELCOME TO THE CHOUTEAU GREENWAY EQUITY WORKING GROUP!

Streets, Connectivity & Built Environment Working Group August 2, 2017

2035 General Plan Update and Belmont Village Specific Plan. Joint Study Session with the City Council and Planning Commission April 12, 2016

East Bench Master Plan Update

Streets for People, Place-Making and Prosperity. #TOcompletestreets

Summary of Action Strategies

CHAPTER 8 ISSUES, CONCERNS, CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES

RECREATION, OPEN SPACE AND GREENWAYS ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

University of Saskatchewan CAMPUS MASTER PLAN. Senate Meeting Preliminary Presentation. April 21, 2018 DIALOG ECS DA WATT

Comprehensive Plan ADOPTED APRIL 2014

Office of Greenways & Trails Providing Statewide Leadership and Coordination. Southeast Greenways and Trails Summit October 1-3, 2017

WELCOME TO THE CHOUTEAU GREENWAY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORKING GROUP!

WELCOME TO THE CHOUTEAU GREENWAY DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION WORKING GROUP!

Welcome! Far Northeast Area Plan Meeting #3 Council District 11 Town Hall Meeting Resource Fair. Jan. 30, 2018

Toronto Complete Streets Guidelines

Potential Green Infrastructure Strategies May 6, 2015 Workshop

Corridor Vision. 1Pursue Minnehaha-Hiawatha Community Works Project. Mission of Hennepin County Community Works Program

PUBLIC SPACES MASTER PLAN UPDATE (POPS) Crystal City Citizen s Review Council October 24, 2018

Animating the Rideau Canal December 2013

Broken Arrow Comprehensive Plan Update Public Workshop Meeting #3 January 23,

City of Fort Lauderdale UPTOWN URBAN VILLAGE. Public Workshop December 7, 2016

Plano Tomorrow Vision and Policies

1.0 Purpose of a Secondary Plan for the Masonville Transit Village

Dyersville Downtown Plan. Open House October 24, 2017

Introduction. Chapter 1. Purpose of the Comprehensive Plan Plan Organization Planning Process & Community Input 1-1

This page intentionally blank.

The transportation system in a community is an

10.0 Open Space and Public Realm

Trail Feasibility and Planning Project for Northern Dutchess County, New York

edmonton.ca/ribbonofgreen #ribbonofgreen

Blueprint Denver Task Force Meeting #

Harlem Avenue Corridor Plan: Corridor Planning Across Municipal Boundaries

City of Nogales General Plan

NORTH CLAYMONT AREA MASTER PLAN COMMUNITY WORKSHOP #1 FEBRUARY 3, 2016

Ten Mile Creek Planning Area

THE COMMUNITY-DRIVEN DESIGN PROCESS

Statewide Greenways Vision

Secrest Short Cut and Monroe Expressway Small Area Plan AUGUST 29, 2018

7Page 1 CLEMMONS COMMUNITY COMPASS 1 PLAN OVERVIEW

SALISBURY TOMORROW Our Vision

Denver Moves: Transit Task Force

1 October Dear Citizens of Charlotte and Mecklenburg County,

Executive Summary. NY 7 / NY 2 Corridor

Phase I Redevelopment Plan. First Community Meeting

Onondaga County Sustainable Streets Project. Onondaga County Planning Federation June 7, Onondaga County Sustainable Streets Project 1

Downtown Streetscape Manual & Built Form Standards

Introduction and Overview

3. VISION AND GOALS. Vision Statement. Goals, Objectives and Policies

Transportation Land Use Integration & Regional Planning. Don Kostelec, AICP Senior Planner, Louis Berger Group February 1, 2010

PLACEMAKING & MOBILITY WORKSHOP. January 27, 2016

REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTER

INDEPENDENCE BOULEVARD AREA PLAN. Economic Development Committee Overview May 25, 2010

implementation r expression in landscape

Loved hearing what others shared and having a dialogue about the possibilities/opportunities

JANUARY 19, 2011 CENTRAL AVENUE-METRO BLUE LINE TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT COMMUNITY FORUM

Atlanta BeltLine. Subareas 9 & 10. Master Plan Updates. March 26, Washington Park Jamboree 1

Public input has been an important part of the plan development process.

John M. Fleming Managing Director, Planning and City Planner. Old East Village Dundas Street Corridor Secondary Plan Draft Terms of Reference

City of Farmington. Downtown Plan. Amendment to the 1998 Master Plan Adopted October 11, 2004

City of Brookfield 2035 Comprehensive Plan. DRAFT #2 October 6, 2009

Concord Community Reuse Project Goals and Guiding Principles. Overarching Goals (OG)

India Basin/Hunters Point Shoreline Community Workshop May 21, 2008

Planning for Waterfront Communities

Preface. Erie. Scranton. Allentown. Pittsburgh. Harrisburg. Philadelphia

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 15, 2016

Northside Interjurisdictional Specific Plan and EIR

Sherri Ferguson. President/CEO Portland Chamber of Commerce. Tennessee Certified Economic Developer Capstone Project

Atlanta BeltLine Subarea 3 Master Plan Update

Mendota-Lebanon Hills Greenway Master Plan Executive Summary. August draft for more information visit

Oroville Area Urban Greening Plan. Joint Meeting of the Oroville Planning, Park, and Arts Commissions October 12, 2015

Town of Cobourg Heritage Master Plan. Statutory Public Meeting

TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT POLICY DRAFT. City Planning and Development Department Kansas City, Missouri

RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

BeltLine Corridor Environmental Study

MAYFIELD VILLAGE GREENWAY TRAIL

Hopkins. Development Guidelines May Overview. Sponsored by: Blake Road Corridor Collaborative City of Hopkins

PUBLIC SPACES MASTER PLAN UPDATE (POPS) Joint Facilities Advisory Commission (JFAC) November 28, 2018

Gary & Regional Investment Project. October 27, Creating Tomorrow Today Comprehensive Regional Plan - NIRPC

PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT & SIX THEMES OF THE PLAN

Transcription:

COMMUNITY MEETING #1 AUGUST, 2017

AGENDA 1. Welcome & Introductions 2. Project Overview 3. Existing Conditions & Planning Context 4. Next Steps 5. Group Mapping Activity Missing links What would you like to see? 2

PROJECT PARTNERS Kelly Coffman Senior Strategic Parks Planner kbc@clevelandmetropark.com Glenn Coyne, FAICP Executive Director County Planning gcoyne@cuyahogacounty.us Andrew Stahlke TLCI Project Manager astahlke@mpo.noaca.org CuyahogaGreenways@clevelandmetroparks.com CONSULTANTS: 3

PROJECT OVERVIEW Cuyahoga County Greenway Plan

PROJECT PURPOSE Develop a strategic plan describing a series of interconnected greenways and urban trails across Cuyahoga County. Build on the existing trail network and fill in the major missing links. Establish a regionally significant network of routes to serve all users, ages, and abilities. 5

GREENWAYS & URBAN TRAILS Greenways are dedicated, linear spaces that provide opportunities for recreation, nonmotorized transportation, and natural features. Typically includes shared-use trails, landscaping, natural amenities, and site furnishings Typically off-street Designed for all ages and all abilities Urban Trails are dedicated facilities that provide non-motorized connections through and between communities for recreation and access to jobs to community assets. Typically located within public rights-of-way or other constrained spaces Typically includes bicycle facilities and/or pathways separated from vehicle roadways Designed for all ages and all abilities May include additional landscaping, natural features, and site furnishings 6 Dequindre Cut, Detroit Indianapolis Cultural Trail

BENEFITS OF GREENWAYS Increases mobility and transportation options Connect jobs, commercial areas, institutions, and residents Improves community health through active living Create attractive, safe and accessible places to walk, bike, hike, run, and more Generates economic activity Add to property value, attract businesses and residents, and contribute to tourism Provides environmental benefits Manage stormwater, protect and restore habitat, and improve air and water quality Enhancing cultural awareness and community identity Connect to local heritage, interpretive opportunities, and community recreation 7

PROJECT AREA 59 Cities, Villages, and Townships + County-wide park district 8

PROJECT AREA REGION BOUNDARIES Three regions established to better focus community engagement and outreach efforts. Roughly correspond to watersheds. Eastside Greenway Area WEST CENTRAL EAST 9

STRUCTURE + ROLES Core Team Project Team Steering Committee Technical Committee Public Engagement 10

STRUCTURE + ROLES Core Team - primary contact for this project responsible for providing guidance, direction and decision-making (15+ meetings) Core Team Cuyahoga County Planning Commission Glenn Coyne Executive Director Jim Sonnhalter Manager of Planning Michael Mears Senior Planner Cleveland Metroparks Kelly Coffman Sara Byrnes Maier Isaac Smith NOACA Andrew Stahlke Melissa Thompson Consultants Neal Billetdeaux Oliver Kiley Nancy Lyon-Stadler Cathy Fromet Gina Gerkin Senior Strategic Park Planner Senior Strategic Park Planner Conservation Program Manager TLCI Project Manager Active Transportation Engineer SmithGroupJJR SmithGroupJJR WSP Guide Guide 11

STRUCTURE + ROLES Core Team - primary contact for this project responsible for providing guidance, direction and decision-making (15+ meetings) Project Team - responsible for providing a regional perspective (6 meetings) Project Team Participating organizations: NOACA Cleveland Metroparks NEORSD GCRTA Bike Cleveland City of Cleveland Planning Commission West Creek Conservancy The Trust for Public Land Cleveland Neighborhood Progress Greater Cleveland Partnership 12

STRUCTURE + ROLES Core Team - primary contact for this project responsible for providing guidance, direction and decision-making (15+ meetings) Project Team - responsible for providing a regional perspective (6 meetings) Technical Committee - responsible for providing technical information and review with respect to their individual organizations (4 meetings) Technical Committee Representatives from: City of Broadview Heights City of Cleveland Office of Sustainability City of Cleveland Traffic Engineering City of Lakewood City of Shaker Heights Cuyahoga County Public Works Cuyahoga County Dept. of Sustainability Cuyahoga Greenway Partners Cuyahoga River Restoration Cuyahoga Soil & Water Conservation District Cuyahoga Valley National Park First Suburbs Consortium LAND studio National Park Service ODOT District 12 Rails to Trails Conservancy UH Bikes Western Reserve Land Conservancy 13

STRUCTURE + ROLES Core Team - primary contact for this project responsible for providing guidance, direction and decision-making (15+ meetings) Project Team - responsible for providing a regional perspective (6 meetings) Technical Committee - responsible for providing technical information and review with respect to their individual organizations (4 meetings) Steering Committee Mayors and City Managers Plus Other Community Stakeholders Steering Committee - responsible for providing perspective on important trail and greenway issues from their respective communities (5 meetings) 14

STRUCTURE + ROLES Core Team - primary contact for this project responsible for providing guidance, direction and decision-making (15+ meetings) Project Team - responsible for providing a regional perspective (6 meetings) Technical Committee - responsible for providing technical information and review with respect to their individual organizations (4 meetings) Steering Committee - responsible for providing perspective on important trail and greenway issues from their respective communities (5 meetings) Public Workshops Area-wide meetings Regional meetings (West, Central, East regions) Online Engagement Surveys Project website / portal Public Engagement - responsible for providing perspective on important trail and greenway issues from their respective communities 4 public meetings/workshops Surveys Project website / portal 15

SCOPE SUMMARY MAY - JUNE JULY - AUGUST SEPTEMBER 1: Project Initiation Confirm project team compositions and region boundaries Initiate logo and branding strategies 2: Current Conditions Existing Conditions + Spatial Inventory & Analysis based on critical attributes: Connectivity Economic Impact Health & Safety Environmental 3: Shaping the Vision Develop a broad-based vision of candidate corridors Core Team Project Team Technical Team Steering Committee Community Meeting Stakeholder Interviews 16

SCOPE SUMMARY OCTOBER - DECEMBER JANUARY - MARCH APRIL - JULY 4: Concept Development Utilize weighted goals/priorities to evaluate trail corridors and identify a connected network 5: Draft Master Plan With Implementation Strategy + Short & Long-term Recommendations 6: Final Report Core Team Project Team Technical Team Steering Committee Community Meeting Stakeholder Interviews 17

EXISTING CONDITIONS Cuyahoga County Greenway Plan 18

CUYAHOGA COUNTY - TRAILS Collaborative Planning: Trails & Bikeways 19

CUYAHOGA COUNTY PLANNING EFFORTS Master Plans in: Bay Village Beachwood Brecksville Cleveland Heights Euclid Maple Heights Mayfield Village Olmsted Falls Parma Parma Heights Richmond Heights Rocky River Strongsville University Heights TLCI Plans in: Highland Hills North Randall Shaker Heights Warrensville Heights 20

GREENWAY NETWORKING Existing greenways and off-road trails mostly within the Cleveland Metroparks system Need to integrate and refine the Eastside Greenway into a county-wide network 21

CLEVELAND METROPARKS Greenway origins trace back to the Metroparks system c. 1920 22

CLEVELAND METROPARKS Park System Today 2015 2019 2017 2018 2016 23

CLEVELAND METROPARKS Internal Planning: Walk-Bike Shed Analysis Trails Matrix Surveys Demographic & Trends Analysis Studies External Planning: Community Master Plans NOACA TLCI Studies 24

CLEVELAND METROPARKS Trail Matrix Attributes Tool to evaluate potential opportunities for Cleveland Metroparks to pursue or support 14 attributes such as public benefit, user populations, and trail experiences Type of Trail/Potential Popularity (choose all relevant) Regional/Statewide Park District/Countywide Local Community Benefit (choose all relevant) Filling "gap" in CM Trails or Regional Trails Links to CM Connect CM to urban core Opportunity to reach under-served areas Link CM to Adjacent Park Districts/Trails High visibility of trail/trailheads/community identity Uses (choose all relevant) Potential commuter route Fills recreational need (mountain bike, water trail, etc.) Trail off-public roadways Draw non-recreation users(wildlife Connects CM to community Trail Experiences (choose all relevant) Provides a destination Scenic/natural/vistas or urban funky experiences Wayfinding - easy/direct route to follow Ease of parking and access to trail Cultural/historic sites Variety of habitats/sights/views/overlooks Length of Trail (choose one) >3 miles 1 to 3 miles < 1 mile Population Within One Mile of Trail (choose one) >25,000 (or considered a regional/statewide trail) 10,000-25,000 < 10,000 Community Support/Partnerships (choose all relevant) Regional and/or Statewide Support County/Park District Support Local Support and meshes with community goals/plans Partnerships agreed to cost share studies/construction Known major opposition Planning (choose one) Planning & design complete & meshes w/cm Planning complete & meshes with CM vision Planning in process No planning or does not mesh w/cm vision & design Ease of Implementation (choose one) Relatively easy implementation (CM property/crews) Some difficulties, but nothing significant Plan not implementable as conceived/some redesign Difficult implementation (ex: railroads/adverse owners) Known Challenges (choose all relevant) No/minimal challenges Significant site issues (slopes, soils, terrain, drainage) Perceived safety concerns/isolation Traffic congestion/several street crossings Ownership not secured Environmental (brownfields; contaminated) Not compatible with natural resources (sensitive areas) 25

CLEVELAND METROPARKS Regional Trail Planning Lake Erie Coastal Ohio Trail & Scenic Byway (ODOT) Industrial Heartland Trail (RTC) National and State Bike Routes (ODOT) Vibrant NEO 2040 Northeast Ohio Sustainable Communities Consortium (NEOSCC)/Northeast Ohio Areawide Coordinating Agency (NOACA) Northeast Ohio Regional Parks Group 26

CLEVELAND METROPARKS Regional Trail Planning Lake Erie Coastal Ohio Trail & Scenic Byway (ODOT) Industrial Heartland Trail (RTC) National and State Bike Routes (ODOT) Vibrant NEO 2040 Northeast Ohio Sustainable Communities Consortium (NEOSCC)/Northeast Ohio Areawide Coordinating Agency (NOACA) Northeast Ohio Regional Parks Group 27

CUYAHOGA GREENWAY PARTNERS The Cuyahoga Greenway Partners is a collaboration to facilitate communication, keep focus and drive the regional trail effort raising the visibility, prioritization, funding methods and implementation of relevant actions in order to complete the recreation, transportationchoice network. Active member organizations include: Bike Cleveland Cleveland Metroparks Cleveland Planning Commission (CPC) Cuyahoga County Board of Health (CCBH) Cuyahoga County Planning Commission (CCPC) and Public Works (PW) Cuyahoga Valley National Park (CVNP) Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority (GCRTA) Northeast Ohio Areawide Coordinating Agency (NOACA) Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District (NEORSD) Rails-to-Trails Conservancy (RTC) The Trust for Public Land (TPL) 28

CUYAHOGA GREENWAY PARTNERS Primary Activities/Goals Routine communication & feedback loop with municipalities Tracking progress, coordination with local trail plans, leadership engagement Support for regional greenway network planning Trail inventory Build management capacity Leverage & maximize funding Develop project sheets for projects Voice for trail and greenway advocacy Messaging, marketing, promotion, regional collaboration 29

NOACA TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM What We Are Doing: Developing recommendations to improve the safety and functionality of five existing and future trail crossing locations: 1. Broadview Rd. 2. Brecksville Rd. 3. Richmond Rd. 4. Mastick Rd./Puritas Ave. 5. Highland Rd. Developing crossing typologies, to better understand and improve all Emerald Necklace bike and pedestrian crossings Public Meeting Schedule: Seek public feedback: August 8 th and 9 th Present recommendations to public: January 2018 30

EASTSIDE GREENWAY Planning Process Identified Missing Links Identified other greenway route opportunities Developed goals and associated evaluation criteria Evaluated the potential benefits of candidate greenway routes Selected high scoring and high community priority routes to form a primary network of greenways Developed an implementation framework and conceptual design for the primary network. 31

DATA ENRICHED, COMMUNITY DRIVEN Planning process uses data and analysis resources to strengthen and empower stakeholder decision-making. Where are the opportunities? How well do candidates meet our goals? Greenways Off-Street Open Space Urban Trails On-Street Constrained Identification of CANDIDATE ROUTES Stakeholder Engagement Known opportunities Gap Identification Planning projects Technical Analysis Availability of: Rights-of-Way Land Properties Framework Plan Priorities Alignment with CIP and other projects Funding Implementation Equity Economic Connectivity Ecology Development of EVALUATION CRITERIA Stakeholder Engagement What are the priorities & critical issues/factors? Technical Analysis Metrics and maps 32 7/25/2017

KEY TOPICS EQUITY CONNECTIVITY ECONOMIC ECOLOGY Socioeconomics - Age - Household Income - Ethnicity Mobility - Car Ownership - Types of commute Physical Safety - Crime - Bike/Pedestrian crashes Health & Wellness - Activity Levels - Fitness - Civic Engagement Links to Existing Non- Motorized Facilities - GAP analysis Access to Transit Services - Limited transit service vs. high transit service Connectivity to Open Spaces - Parks - Linear corridors - Natural Areas Connectivity to Assets - Employment Centers - Retail / Entertainment - Cultural Centers - Schools/Universities - Institutions / Hospitals Regional Trails & Tourism Property Value Visual Character - Industrial - Large roadway - Tree canopy cover - Waterway and water body - Landmarks Habitat Protection - Within existing natural land cover - Protected areas - Within floodplain - Within steep slope - Within riparian/wetland buffer zone Restoration & Open Space Creation - Proximity to existing natural features - % Tree Canopy Cover Stormwater & Green Infrastructure 33 7/25/2017

NEXT STEPS Cuyahoga County Greenway Plan 34 7/25/2017

NEXT STEPS Inventory & analysis mapping Identify & evaluate candidate routes Steering Committee & Project Team meetings Community Meetings January, 2018 Website/Survey: www.cuyahogagreenways.org How you get around (mode) Use characteristics (frequency, barriers) Greenway benefits 35 7/25/2017

BRANDING & LOGO 36

DISCUSSION Cuyahoga County Greenway Plan 37 7/25/2017

GROUP MAPPING SESSION Use BLUE dots/markers to identify destinations that you currently access from the non-motorized network. E.g. employment centers, parks, retail districts Use GREEN dots/markers to identify destinations that you would like to access from the greenway or urban trail system E.g. Gaps in the trail system, Use RED dots/markers to indicate places where major problems or concerns exist. E.g. dangerous intersections, barrier streets If you leave a dot, leave a note with it! Website/Survey: www.cuyahogagreenways.org 38