Workshop. Valley Vision Stanislaus. Our Schedule. Help Shape Our Region s Future! The Scenarios. Who is StanCOG? How Do I Select a Scenario?

Similar documents
Prepared for the Citizens of Forsyth County by the City-County Planning Board

Roundtable Meeting #1

CITY OF PUYALLUP. Background. Development Services

Remi Mendoza City Planning Academy March 13, 2017

Blueprint Denver Task Force Meeting #

CHAPTER 1. Ms. Guajardo s Class - Central Elementary CH 1 1

INDEPENDENCE BOULEVARD AREA PLAN. June 24, 2008

Communities Plan. Parkland-Spanaway-Midland. LUAC Review of Draft Policies

Economic Development & Housing Council Committee Comprehensive Plan Update September 20, 2005

TOD 101 CREATING LIVABLE COMMUNITIES WITH TRANSIT

A. WHAT IS A GENERAL PLAN?

PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE HURONTARIO-MAIN CORRIDOR SECONDARY PLAN

Broadway District Specific Plan. Community Workshop #2 February 23,2016

Robbinsdale LRT Station. CDI Development Guidelines. August Overview

LAND USE AMENDMENT DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL CORE (WARD 7) MACLEOD TRAIL SE AND 5 AVENUE SE BYLAW 254D2017

NEC of Central Avenue and Indian School Road

Silver Line CPAM UPDATE. Transportation and Land Use Committee October 20, 2016

Old Town Neighborhoods Plan. Choices Event Wednesday, December 9, 2015

LEED-ND 101: Practical Strategies for Achieving Sustainability Goals. Travis Parker Lakewood Planning Director

Hillsborough County MPO Transit Study. Citizens Team Workshop Wednesday, February 28 th, 2006 Hillsborough Community College - Brandon

Urban Planning and Land Use

South Central Connecticut Region Plan of Conservation & Development 2018 Update. Municipal Planners

2035 General Plan Update and Belmont Village Specific Plan. Joint Study Session with the City Council and Planning Commission April 12, 2016

Silver Line CPAM UPDATE. Transportation and Land Use Committee October 14, 2016

Cumberland Region Tomorrow is a private, non-profit, citizen based regional organization working with Greater Nashville Regional Council

JANUARY 19, 2011 CENTRAL AVENUE-METRO BLUE LINE TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT COMMUNITY FORUM

ORANGE LINE TRANSIT NEIGHBORHOOD PLANS VAN NUYS NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL, PLUM COMMITTEE DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING, CITY OF LOS ANGELES

DOMINION BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN A MODEL FOR CHESAPEAKE S FUTURE

Transportation Land Use Integration & Regional Planning. Don Kostelec, AICP Senior Planner, Louis Berger Group February 1, 2010

Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan

S A C R A M E N T O C O U N T Y JACKSON HIGHWAY & GRANT LINE EAST VISIONING STUDY

CDAC. Update: Downtown Dartmouth Update: CDAC July 25 th Motion

Implementation Guide Comprehensive Plan City of Allen

REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF REGIONAL LAND USE

of ZONING OVERHAUL

Gary & Regional Investment Project. October 27, Creating Tomorrow Today Comprehensive Regional Plan - NIRPC

SAN RAFAEL GENERAL PLAN 2040 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW

Official Plan Review

D-O LRT Zoning Discussion. Chapel Hill Boards & Commissions October 16, 2017

DOWNTOWN AREA PLAN. June 9, 2009

Plano Tomorrow Vision and Policies

TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PINELLAS COUNTY MPO LIVABLE COMMUNITIES INITIATIVE PINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS

South Davis County COMMUNITY SPOTLIGHT

LAND USE DESIGNATIONS AND ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS

Citizen Comment Staff Response Staff Recommended Revision Planning Committee

City Council Special Meeting AGENDA ITEM NO. C.

Gratigny Parkway East Extension Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Study

Natomas Vision Plan and PLNP

CITY OF ALHAMBRA DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 111 S. First Street. Alhambra, CA (626) FAX (626)

Growth Management Planning in the Central Puget Sound Region. Today s Presentation. Puget Sound Region. New Partners for Smart Growth

2040 LUP is a part of the Comprehensive Plan and carries the same legal authority. Economic Challenges

North Downtown Specific Plan MEMORANDUM

TOWN OF NEW CASTLE - Master Plan Update

The Floyds Fork Area Study A Framework for Growth

WAC #7 3/14/14. Coachella General Plan Update

Cobb County Design Guidelines Mableton Parkway & Veterans Memorial Highway Community Design Workshop January 12, 2017

Mount Pleasant Comprehensive Plan Public Open House Meeting. June 5, 2018

PINE CURVE REZONING. BACKGROUND Purchased as two parcels in 2001 and 2002

Tyvola & Archdale Transit Station Area Plan. June 5, 2008

Chapter #3 LAND USE AND SCENARIO PLANNING

September 28, 2017 Wentworth Avenue (CR 8) Sidewalk Improvements Open House

Chapter 3: Land Use and Local Planning

North Fair Oaks Community Plan Summary and Information

Corridor Vision. 1Pursue Minnehaha-Hiawatha Community Works Project. Mission of Hennepin County Community Works Program

Public Meeting Final Recommendations August 8, 2013

CITY OF SACRAMENTO GENERAL PLAN. UC Davis ESP 171 Urban and Regional Planning April 21, 2011

Making TOD Work in the Heart of Suburban Sprawl

Isabel Neighborhood Plan: Alternatives

Denver Moves: Transit Task Force

13 THORNHILL YONGE STREET STUDY IMPLEMENTATION CITY OF VAUGHAN OPA 669 AND TOWN OF MARKHAM OPA 154

Atlanta BeltLine Corridor Environmental Study. Scoping Meeting August 2008

Planning Commission Special Workshop. October 25, 2018

EXPO LINE COMMUNITY WORKSHOPS NOVEMBER 27 TH & DECEMBER 3 RD Los Angeles Department of City Planning

Complete Streets in Lancaster County

Tyvola & Archdale Transit Station Area Plan. May 15, 2008

Future Proposed Development

Broken Arrow Comprehensive Plan Update Public Workshop Meeting #3 January 23,

Chapter 1.0 Introduction

MORRISVILLE TRANSPORTATION PLAN TOWN COUNCIL PRESENTATION AUGUST 22, 2017

TONIGHT S PURPOSE INFORMATION SESSION CANORA & WEST JASPER PLACE SIDE STREETS CONCEPT PLANNING STUDY. Share draft side streets concept plan

CHAPTER 7: VISION AND ACTION STATEMENTS. Noble 2025 Vision Statement

Street Flooding Mitigation Plan KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission. Presented to AMPO National Conference October 18, 2017

Danvers High Street I-1 District Study

Roosevelt Corridor. R e i n v e s t m e n t P l a n. Public Meeting Gilbert Elementary School May 12, :00 pm

PINE CURVE REZONING. Property does not meet criteria for open space preservation and is not a candidate for a park

Horizon 2035 Land Use and Transportation Element

Prosperity Hucks Area Plan. Transportation and Planning Committee May 11, 2015

ROBBINSDALE LRT STATION CDI DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES

The Auburn Plan Designing the Future of Auburn February 28, 2005

DRAFT PLAN PRESENTATION

Tri-County Transportation & Land Use Study. Steering Committee Meeting May 14, 2009

Planning Commission Report

Summary Community Workshop #1 Fruitvale San Antonio Senior Center Monday, March 23, :00-9:00 p.m.

Preliminary Plan Framework: Vision and Goals

EAST SELKIRK SECONDARY PLAN

RESEDA - WEST VAN NUYS COMMUNITY PLAN UPDATE WORKSHOP

Living in Albemarle County s Urban Places

LAND USE MEADOWS PLANNING AREA

NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND SCOPING MEETING FOR THE WEST BROADWAY SPECIFIC PLAN COMMENT PERIOD

1.0 Introduction. Purpose and Basis for Updating the TMP. Introduction 1

Transcription:

Valley Vision Stanislaus Workshop Help Shape Our Region s Future! Valley Vision Stanislaus is a long-range planning process that will link future land use with a framework for investment in roads, freeways, public transit, and bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure. At this stage in the process, StanCOG has prepared four growth scenarios with complementary transportation investments. StanCOG is seeking your input on which scenario you think best meets the region s needs. The Scenarios 1 2 3 4 Historical Trend New Trend Pages 77 2-3 include maps that show potential future development patterns for each scenario through 2035 so you can compare the different types of growth. Each presents future year 2035 conditions. Scenario 1 presents continued growth similar to past development patterns. Scenario 2 shows growth and development that conforms to the general plans of the county and cities. Scenario 3 presents a growth pattern with a greater emphasis on mixed-use and infill development. Scenario 4 takes the mixed-use emphasis of Scenario 3 even further by locating more growth within cities. How Do I Select a Scenario? Moderate Change More Change To help you select your preferred scenario, StanCOG has prepared comparisons between the scenarios based on various transportation and land-use performance measures. These comparisons are provided on pages 4-8. The four scenarios are consistently marked like the samples above. Our Schedule AUGUST 2013 NOW! StanCOG will hold three workshops and five city presentations (see back page) to present the four scenarios and get your feedback on a preferred scenario. SEPTEMBER 2013 The Policy Board will select a preferred scenario. NOVEMBER 2013 TO JANUARY 2014 The Valley Vision Stanislaus documents will be released and available for comment. MARCH 2014 END! StanCOG will hold a public hearing and the Policy Board will adopt the Valley Vision Stanislaus plan. Who is StanCOG? StanCOG is the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Stanislaus Region as designated by the Federal government, and the Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA) as designated by the State of California. It is responsible for developing and updating a variety of transportation plans and for allocating Federal and State funds to implement them. StanCOG is directed by a board of Mayors, Cty Council Members and County Supervisors who work together to address regional issues. Select your preferred scenario at: www.valleyvisionstanislaus.com 1

Land Use Patterns 1 Historical Trend Development Patterns Growth occurs adjacent to existing communities Complementary Uses Suburban, auto-oriented development Services and employment separated from housing Development Density New low-density housing Development occurs at lower end of allowed general plan densities Transit/Transportation Corridors Limited alternative transportation options Continued expansion of roadways 2 New Trend Development Patterns Growth occurs adjacent to existing communities or as infill Complementary Uses Mix of suburban and compact development Improved housing-type options Development Density Mix of large lot single-family housing and smaller lot single-family housing Development occurs at targeted general plan densities Transit/Transportation Corridors Increased availability of alternative modes of travel 2

3 Moderate Change Development Patterns Infill within downtowns and mixed-use neighborhoods Complementary Uses Compact development within mixeduse centers, and in new traditional neighborhoods Development Density New multi-family, mixed-use housing with a mix of smaller lot housing Development occurs at the upper end of allowed general plan densities Transit/Transportation Corridors Increased availability of alternative modes of travel 4 More Change Development Patterns Very limited expansion of existing community boundaries Infill within downtowns and mixed neighborhoods Complementary Uses Compact development in downtowns and in new traditional neighborhoods Development Density Greater percentage of multifamily, mixed-use housing, and duplex/ townhomes as new housing stock. Transit/Transportation Corridors Increased availability of alternative modes of travel 3

4

5

6

Valley Vision Stanislaus About What is Valley Vision Stanislaus? Valley Vision Stanislaus is a regional planning effort of StanCOG, Stanislaus County, and the Cities of Ceres, Hughson, Modesto, Newman, Oakdale, Patterson, Riverbank, Turlock, and Waterford. It is intended to improve the quality of life in our communities by expanding transportation, housing, and employment. Valley Vision Stanislaus is taking a big-picture look at how our communities can grow over time in a way that uses resources efficiently, protects existing communities, conserves farmland and open space, and supports our local economy. StanCOG, who is responsible for setting the transportation policy and priorities for the region, will use the results of Valley Vision Stanislaus to prepare the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). Why are we doing this? The Federal government requires that MPOs such as StanCOG develop RTPs every four years to reflect current population, employment, and travel projections, as we as changes in local plans and regional transportation priorities. The State of California requires RTPs to coordinate transportation planning with regional housing and land use policies in order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Without an adopted RTP, the region would not be eligible for Federal and State funding for major transportation improvements. Valley Vision Stanislaus is also an opportunity to think about how we want our region to change and evolve over the next several years to meet our needs and reflect our values. Planning in advance of growth can result in better neighborhoods, more housing and transportation choices, and a higher quality of life for residents. 7

Valley Vision Stanislaus Upcoming Events August Patterson Community Workshop Wednesday, August 14th 6:30-8:30 PM City Council Chambers 1 Plaza Patterson, CA Waterford City Council Study Session Thursday, August 15th 5:30 PM 101 E Street Waterford, CA Turlock Planning Commission Presentation Thursday, August 15th 7:00 PM 156 S. Broadway, Yosemite Community Room Turlock, CA Oakdale Community Workshop Tuesday, August 20th 6:30 8:30 PM Gene Bianchi Community Center 110 South Second Avenue Oakdale, CA Ceres Community Workshop 6:30-830PM Tuesday, August 27th 2701 Fourth Street, Community Room Ceres, CA Ceres Council Presentation Monday, August 26th 5:30 PM 2701 Fourth Street Ceres, CA Hughson Council Presentation Monday, August 26th 7:00 PM 7018 Pine Street Hughson, CA Modesto Planning Commission Presentation Wednesday, August 28th 6:00 PM City-County Chambers 1010 10th Street Modesto, CA 8