THE COMMUNITY-DRIVEN DESIGN PROCESS

Similar documents
Town of Peru Comprehensive Plan Executive Summary

1 Port Street East: Delivering on the Vision. Andrew Whittemore Director, City Planning Strategies. Ruth Marland. TOPCA May 23, 2017

Chapter 2: Vision, Goals and Strategies

Small Area Plan. South Gateway

hermitage town center

The John Bartram Association Action Plan to advance the 10 year Strategic Plan

Village of Fair Haven Goals & Objectives

What Pioneer Grove Will Look Like?

City of Farmington. Downtown Plan. Amendment to the 1998 Master Plan Adopted October 11, 2004

Denton. A. Downtown Task Force

Project Profile BAR HARBOR

June 19th Public Workshop #3 Summary

Envision Front Royal Workshop 1 of 2

Comprehensive Plan Advisory Panel Meeting #3

SUBJECT: Waterfront Hotel Planning Study Update TO: Planning and Development Committee FROM: Department of City Building. Recommendation: Purpose:

Downtown Whitby Action Plan

DOWNTOWN GEORGETOWN PLANNING STUDY

NORTH CLAYMONT AREA MASTER PLAN COMMUNITY WORKSHOP #1 FEBRUARY 3, 2016

Keyport. Vision for Keyport

PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT & SIX THEMES OF THE PLAN

THE TOWN OF WASAGA BEACH

Master Plan Visioning #1 Section 3 Informal amphitheater at Community Development Services Building. Section 3 MP Visioning #1

Introduction to the project Feedback from you to guide the plan Dig in to propel us forward quickly (survey) Clear understanding of roles moving

Report to: Development Services Committee Report Date: April 24, 2017

Saranac River Trail Greenway C O N D I T I O N S R E P O R T

7Page 1 CLEMMONS COMMUNITY COMPASS 1 PLAN OVERVIEW

Countywide Green Infrastructure

Emerson Park Master Plan Update. Public Meeting III August 27, 2014

Marshview Park. Concept Briefing and Feedback Session. Aquarium/Owls Creek Plan Steering Committee March 20, 2012

Town of Westport. Design Guidelines Development Committee Public Informational Presentation

HUMBER BAY PARK EAST BUILDING PROJECT Architectural Community Resource Group Meeting #2 July 5, 2017

Fort Wellington National Historic Site

Dyersville Downtown Plan. Open House October 24, 2017

Queensborough Eastern Neighbourhood Node. Community Open House

ELK GROVE GENERAL PLAN VISION

Washington County Trails & Recreation Planning Public Workshop 2018

Rio/29 Small Area Plan. Design Plan & Implementation Framework Open House - January 25, 2018

Commercial, Retail and Tourism Executive Summary December 2018

City Center Neighborhood Plan

STUDY AREA. Tonight s Agenda. Project Tasks Completed. Next Steps. Town of Oyster Bay Eastern Waterfront Community Vision & Revitalization Plan

HUMBER BAY PARK PROJECT - BUILDING CONCEPT

Preliminary Plan Framework: Vision and Goals

4-Town Comprehensive Plan DRAFT 7/30/07

VILLAGE & TOWN OF BERGEN: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

01 Welcome! About Ontario Shores

Parks Master Plan Implementation: Phase I Waterfront Use and Design REPORT #: September 7, 2016 File #

Workshop #3 June 13, 2016

Sherri Ferguson. President/CEO Portland Chamber of Commerce. Tennessee Certified Economic Developer Capstone Project

PLAN ELEMENTS WORKSHOP. April 5, 2016

Public input has been an important part of the plan development process.

2. AGENCY COORDINATION AND PUBLIC INVOLVMENT

Highland Falls Waterfront Redevelopment Feasibility Study Village Board Meeting March 20, 2017

Special Joint Meeting. Emerald Isle Planning Board. Emerald Isle Board of Commissioners. January 18, 2017

Courtice Main Street Study Community Vision Workshop PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT

The Chinese University of Hong Kong Campus Master Plan Stage 3 Stakeholders' Engagement Report

Presentation of the Staff Draft. July 17, 2014 SSRVP Team, Area 3

TOWN OF BETHLEHEM MEETING SUMMARY LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM UPDATE

Summary of Changes for the Comprehensive Draft Proposed Official Plan Amendment

This Review Is Divided Into Two Phases:

3. VISION AND GOALS. Vision Statement. Goals, Objectives and Policies

ARISE: The Rock Renaissance Area Redevelopment & Implementation Strategy

7Page 91 CLEMMONS COMMUNITY COMPASS 7 COMMUNITY CHARACTER

ESTABLISH AN EFFICIENT TOWN CENTER

Request for Proposals: Architectural/Design Guidelines

Town of Cobourg Heritage Master Plan. Statutory Public Meeting

Attachment 1 PFAC Resolution #394 of December 4, 2014

... on the draft Arden Vision & Framework

LUNDY S LANE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN STUDY

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of June 16, 2018

City of Lake Mary, Florida. Evolution of a Historic Downtown with Transit Oriented Development Strategies

CHAPTER 3 VISION, GOALS, & PLANNING PRINCIPLES. City of Greensburg Comprehensive Plan. Introduction. Vision Statement. Growth Management Goals.

section 3: Vision, Values and Goals

Comprehensive Plan. Faribault, Minnesota. Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. Claybaugh Preservation Architecture Inc. Howard R. Green Company Bonz/REA

Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan

Lambeth Main Street Streetscape Improvements

2035 General Plan Update and Belmont Village Specific Plan. Joint Study Session with the City Council and Planning Commission April 12, 2016

APPENDIX K WINDSOR OFFICIAL PLAN

Public Open House. Overview of the Downtown Plan Official Plan Amendment April 23, 2018

SQUAMISH 2010 AND BEYOND COMMUNITY VISION

Illustrative Development Plan

UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY 2012 Campus Plan Update. Ross Tarrant Architects

North Fair Oaks Community Plan Summary and Information

Please read the entire document

DRAFT PLAN PRESENTATION

SARANAC LAKE VISION CONCEPTS

City Council Special Meeting AGENDA ITEM NO. C.

Pointe-Claire Community Destination

Greenway. Two Rivers. Design Guidelines and Signage Plan. Broome County. Tioga County. Prepared For: The Binghamton Metropolitan Transportation Study

Elliot Park 2. Neighborhood Master Plan. Historical Perspective

Kick-off Meeting,: September 11, 2014

Sustainable Development Call for Projects Western Infrastructure Project Submissions

WEST BLACKHALL STREET PUBLIC REALM + TOWN CENTRE CONNECTIONS Public Exhibition 28 th June 2018

Route 347. New York State Department of Transportation Region 10, Long Island. THE GREENING of ROUTE 347

Strategies/Actions Priority List

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2018 January 25. That Calgary Planning Commission recommend APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

Community Open House March 26 th, 2018

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Environmental Review Process

PHASE ONE. A summary report: What the community told Alcoa during Phase One of the community engagement program for Point Henry 575.

Urban Planning and Land Use

Land Use Amendment in Southwood (Ward 11) at and Elbow Drive SW, LOC

Transcription:

THE COMMUNITY-DRIVEN DESIGN PROCESS A PUBLIC DRIVEN PROCESS STEERING COMMITEE THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS

THE COMMUNITY DRIVEN DESIGN PROCESS A Public Driven Process Beginning with the Comprehensive Plan, the Town Board supported a community-based process to develop future plans and a community vision based on the expressed sentiment of the Tofte public and continued to support a community driven design process for the Tofte Town Center Designs. This process was structured to empower the Tofte public in decision making regarding the design proposals, provide information, and explore opportunities through the Steering Committee. The process built on the work produced from the Comprehensive Planning Process, held several community-wide open house meetings for information gathering and design programming, conducted multiple design presentations for the purposes of feedback and review from the community, used Web postings of the design work and e-mail for additional feedback, and distributed a survey to all Tofte property owners. The Community-based process was structured as follows: The Steering Committee was formed with the idea that a smaller committee represent all interests of the community and is formed to steer the process, This Steering Committee periodically checked in with the community at large, There was an ongoing process to involve and check in with the larger community through the use of the media, open houses, surveys, newsletters, and the internet updates posted on a Web site.

A PUBLIC DRIVEN PROCESS 15

THE COMMUNITY-DRIVEN DESIGN PROCESS Steering Committee The Town Board solicited Steering Committee members at the first community-wide open house as well as notifying people who participated on the Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee. See Appendix A for its members. The Steering Committee was formed to be a working committee that represented all interests of the community. Decisions made by the Steering Committee were made through consensus; that is, every one on the Steering Committee could live with the decision. Steering Committee work was structured as follows: The Steering Committee steered the design process, The Steering Committee periodically checked in with the community at large, and The Steering Committee deliberated on the strengths and weaknesses of each of the options developed by the design team and made recommendations to the Town Board after checking in with the community at large. Event: Booth at Parade With Survey Date: July 4, 2005 Work at Event: Sought ideas regarding the Tofte Town Center as well as Steering Committee members. (See Appendix B: July 4th Survey) Event: Community-Wide Open House Date: June 26, 2006 Work at Event: Reviewed and sought comments on designs, Option 3 - By-Pass was removed from further consideration, continued to explore Option 1- Hwy 61 north of Market, and further explored slight realignment of HWY 61. Event: Community-Wide Open House Date: August 21, 2006 Work at Event: Reviewed the two Options: Hwy 61 north of North Shore Market and slight realignment of HWY 61; Reviewed existing conditions in Tofte and MNDOT s last design for re-building Hwy 61. Event: Survey Date: September 5, 2006 Work at Event: Sent survey to all property owners in Tofte regarding the two design options. (See Appendix D for a summary of the results) Steering Committee Meeting Date: October 10, 2006 Work at Meeting: Reviewed survey results and formulated recommendations to the Town Board. Event: Community-Wide Open House Date: October 25, 2005 Work at Event: Visioning Process for the Town Center Steering Committee Meeting Date: December 6, 2005 Work at Meeting: Establish the Committee, analyze town site, review Comprehensive Plan, and review comments from 10.25.05 Open House. (See Appendix C for a Summary of Comments) Steering Committee Meeting Date: January 24, 2006 Work at Meeting: Reviewed 3 options; Directed consultants to explore Option1 where HWY 61shifts north of the North Shore Market and Option 3 where HWY 61 bypasses Town Center on power line ROW. Option 2, slight shift in alignment of Hwy 61, remains on the table, but not explored at this time. Steering Committee Meeting Date: May 23, 2006 Work at Meeting: Reviewed Options 1 and 2; Reviewed the correctness of data; Sought improvements and concerns with design options.

STEERING COMMITTEE 17

THE COMMUNITY-DRIVEN DESIGN PROCESS The Comprehensive Plan The Comprehensive Plan is very clear on the vision, goals, and policies in directing the Town Center Design. (For a more complete list of goals and policies, please see Appendix E) These goals and policies helped form the basis for developing the Town Center Design Options. The following summarizes the vision for the Town Center: The village is a preeminent North Shore destination with a unique and remarkably vibrant village center. The village continues to be a core commercial center in the west end of Cook County with a strong commercial and public service hub and a mix of housing. This commercial center has a village core that extends inland providing basic services for local residents as well as services that compliment the seasonal residents and visitors to the area. New community facilities such as an outdoor concert space and amphitheater provide a space for local residents and visitors to gather and enjoy many community activities. The village has innovative, shared sewer systems and water supply systems that protect its natural resources. There is an interconnected sense of place from the gateway to the village, following the Shore to Tofte Park, winding through the main commercial center to the western edge of the village. This village way passes through the village weaving along, providing glimpses of the Lake as well as places to connect with the water. Visitors and residents alike, share the history of Tofte, by walking along a marked historical tour through the village passing by the Tofte Park, the restored dock and the expanded fishing museum. At its heart stands the Tofte Commercial Fishing Museum interpreting Tofte s heritage and exploring the evolution of the village of Tofte. The village of Tofte finds its inspiration from its fishing and logging heritage creating a concentrated village core which anchors Tofte s sense of place. The Town of Tofte along with MNDOT received a National Design award for their Creative Village Main Street design incorporating a village core while providing an efficient, safe route through the village. The roadway has been designed to enhance safety, is consistent with the scale of the village, and preserves the natural beauty along the Scenic By-Way.

THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 19

THE COMMUNITY-DRIVEN DESIGN PROCESS Opportunities and Constraints After a comprehensive plan review, several programming meetings, and design review meetings, the following opportunities and constraints were identified: Infrastructure Issues: Safety for pedestrians along and crossing Highway 61 Ability for Highway 61 to function as a regional transportation road Interconnections within the community including pedestrian paths Location of Gitchi Gami Trail to maximize benefits to the community and all users Review zoning code to concentrate development and limit strip development along the new highway alignments Impact of the Highway 61 realignment on property owners. Impact on current highway-oriented businesses Impact of realignment of Highway 61 on County and Town roads and the responsibility for ongoing maintenance Adequate parking Storm water and sanitary sewer capacities Costs of infrastructure improvements and sources of funding Natural Resources Brownfield potential in the salvage yard Impacts on wetlands Impacts on water quality Maintaining and enhancing the character of the town s natural heritage Promotion of storm water infiltration Use of ditches where possible Use of native plants Commercial Opportunities: Amount of new commercial space Effect of Town Center designs on property owners Concentration of new business development A new business center that attracts a variety of business types, not only tourism based Community Character Potential for civic spaces Connection of Town centers with the waterfront The redesign of some of the existing businesses to support the town center Maintaining and enhancing Tofte s village character and cultural heritage Maintain and enhance natural character in town core areas New signs based on existing character of Tofte

OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS 21