ANC 2A Presentation. November 9, 2006

Similar documents
Vision & Land Use. Discussion. Historic Preservation Plan. Foggy Bottom Campus Plan:

University of the District of Columbia Van Ness Campus Master Plan Community Open House 3. December 8, 2010

2030 Comprehensive Plan VISION STATEMENT

LEED-ND 101: Practical Strategies for Achieving Sustainability Goals. Travis Parker Lakewood Planning Director

KENDALL SQUARE INITIATIVE. Planned Unit Development Special Permit Application - SoMa September 8, 2015

The George Washington University Museum Foggy Bottom Campus Plan Site 102B - Z.C. Case No F/06-12F April 5, 2012

Welcome to the Oakridge Centre Open House

NORTH TORONTO COLLEGIATE INSTITUTE. the Journey to a New Urban School + the Partnerships which gave it Life

KENDALL SQUARE INITIATIVE. Planned Unit Development Special Permit Application - SoMa September 8, 2015

EXHIBIT A. Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 1 (Town Center) First Amended Project Plan 1

THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY MOUNT VERNON CAMPUS

JANUARY 19, 2011 CENTRAL AVENUE-METRO BLUE LINE TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT COMMUNITY FORUM

ROBBINSDALE LRT STATION CDI DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES

The Five Components of the McLoughlin Area Plan

Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan

Status Report: MD 355 Project

EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Robbinsdale LRT Station. CDI Development Guidelines. August Overview

UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY 2012 Campus Plan Update. Ross Tarrant Architects

Urban Planning and Land Use

1071 King Street West Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

C. Westerly Creek Village & The Montview Corridor

Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center

Developer s Program. The Station at East 54

Chapter 1: Introduction

4.1.3 LAND USE CATEGORIES

Figure 1- Site Plan Concept

Economic Development & Housing Council Committee Comprehensive Plan Update September 20, 2005

Allen Street Civic District Redevelopment Area Plan Redevelopment Plan & Proposal State College Planning Commission State College Redevelopment

Subregion 4 Central Avenue-Metro Blue Line Corridor Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Implementation Project. Community Meeting April 27, 2011

TEMPLE MEDICAL & EDUCATION DISTRICT

Request for Proposals: Architectural/Design Guidelines

PLAN ELEMENTS WORKSHOP. April 5, 2016

City of Woodinville Planning Commission Study Session. Development Regulations 101: An Overview of Specific Regulatory Items To Help You in 2012

City of Lake Mary, Florida. Evolution of a Historic Downtown with Transit Oriented Development Strategies

LAND USE OVERVIEW WHAT YOU WILL FIND IN THIS CHAPTER

OVERVIEW OF PLANS FOR THE JEFFERSON COUNTY COUNTRYSIDE FARM In the Context of Quality Place Characteristics

Cumberland Region Tomorrow is a private, non-profit, citizen based regional organization working with Greater Nashville Regional Council

Downtown North Las Vegas Demonstration Site Project. Project Update

EYA Presentation to ANC 5A Committee of the Whole. The Josephite Seminary Property Washington, DC. April 13, 2016

ESTABLISH AN EFFICIENT TOWN CENTER

North Fair Oaks Community Plan Summary and Information

Executive Summary. NY 7 / NY 2 Corridor

Stockton Waterfront Master Plan. Waterfront Master Plan

Transit / Housing Oriented Redevelopment

Downtown Elkton Station Area Plan, Elkton, MD. Difficult enough to get support for new starts challenge to fund Houston transit

38 Queen s University Campus Master Plan Part 1

Implementation & Equity 201:

New Partners for Smart Growth Conference February 5, 2010

b r a n c h av e n u e tr a n s it co r r i d o r r e vita lization pl a n a m o d el fo r s u b u r ban retro fit

The transportation system in a community is an

(DC1) Direct Development Control Provision DC1 Area 4

13 THORNHILL YONGE STREET STUDY IMPLEMENTATION CITY OF VAUGHAN OPA 669 AND TOWN OF MARKHAM OPA 154

IMPLEMENTING SOMERSET COUNTY S INVESTMENT FRAMEWORK

Silverdale Regional Center

Presentation to Town Council in association with Kubilins Transportation Group Rose & Associates Equinox Environmental

PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE HURONTARIO-MAIN CORRIDOR SECONDARY PLAN

WELCOME and introduction

Rezoning Frequently Asked Questions

Cherokee. Corporate Headquarters 111 East Hargett Street Suite 300 Raleigh, NC

The Village of Shirlington

Preliminary Recommendations Tk Takoma/Langley Crossroads Sector Plan

17.11 Establishment of Land Use Districts

Good Design Guidelines for Downtown. Preliminary Findings and Recommendations

3.1 community vision. 3.3 required plan elements

Plano Tomorrow Vision and Policies

18 May 2016 CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPATE

CITY OF COLWICH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE LAND USE 1

Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

DRAFT Land Use Chapter

University of Denver Land Use Plan Update I. Executive Summary

CHAPTER 12 IMPLEMENTATION

MONTGOMERY COUNTY METRO STATION AREA DESIGN CHARRETTE

S A C R A M E N T O C O U N T Y JACKSON HIGHWAY & GRANT LINE EAST VISIONING STUDY

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PANEL. Graniteville TAP: Developing a Community Vision

Appendix C: Interim Mixed-Use Evaluation Criteria

City of Fort Lauderdale UPTOWN URBAN VILLAGE. Public Workshop December 7, 2016

1.3 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION THEME 1: PUTTING TRANSIT AT THE CENTRE OF COMMUNITIES. Fully integrate transit with community planning

FOUR MILE RUN VALLEY WORKING GROUP AND CHARGE

Former Rockcliffe Airbase Community Design Plan Guiding Design Vision and Principles December 4, 2013

Sacred Heart Catholic Church

City of Long Beach. creating vibrant and exciting places

SECTION ONE: INTRODUCTION. introduction

Future Land Use SAMPLE RECOMMENDATIONS

University of Minnesota. MINNEAPOLIS CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK February 11, 2016

Subject: 30 Otis Street, Evaluation of Shadow on Proposed 11th and Natoma Park

THE GREEN VISION WORKSHOP Friday, November 6, 2009

CITY OF PUYALLUP. Background. Development Services

Kenilworth Avenue and Town of Cheverly Industrial Study Briefing

PARTNERSHIP FOR COLLABORATIVE INNOVATION


VICTORIA DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLANNING

Overview and Update of the Rutgers-New Brunswick Physical Master Plan. January 2015

6. DOWNTOWN. The Downtown Element focuses on supporting and expanding the vitality and enhancement of Downtown Chico as the City s central core.

BROOKLYN PARK / 85TH AVE LRT STATION CDI DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES DRAFT

Preliminary Plan Framework: Vision and Goals

WELCOME TO THE CHOUTEAU GREENWAY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORKING GROUP!

The Private Role in a Public-Private Partnership. Ask Me Anything Conference May 30, 2018

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS THURGOOD MARSHALL COLLEGE NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING STUDY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO

Institutional Overlay Zone (IOZ) Regulatory Framework

Transcription:

ANC 2A Presentation November 9, 2006

Introduction & Overview Applicants Boston Properties and KSI Services (project developers) The George Washington University (land owner) 2.66 acre site (former GW hospital location) Currently zoned R-5-D, seeking C-3-C rezoning Consistent with surrounding zoning and built environment PUD and rezoning requested to create vibrant, mixeduse, transit oriented development of world-class design Retail, residential (rental), and Class A office uses 870,000 square feet of gross floor area, 7.5 FAR Significant public benefits and amenities superior to matter of right development warrant PUD planning flexibility

Building a World-Class University The Foggy Bottom Campus Plan: 2006 2025 Carefully balanced Plan and proposed conditions premised on Grow Up, Not Out philosophy to accommodate forecasted academic and student housing space needs within existing Campus Plan boundaries DCPS/GW School Without Walls Project Unique public/private programmatic and development partnership that provides modernization and addition to Grant School and new GW undergraduate residence hall Square 54 By accommodating forecasted space needs on campus, Campus Plan allows for redevelopment of Square 54 as mixed-use town center Reflects GW s broader strategic planning initiatives to create a world-class university in the nation s capital

Shared Benefits: For The Community Concentrates new University development in targeted locations in the core of the campus, away from surrounding residential neighborhoods Provides neighborhood-serving retail services on Square 54 and along the proposed I Street Retail Corridor Enhances the public environment and pedestrian experience through landscaping and streetscape improvements Includes significant new University commitments, including a schedule for the transition of off-campus properties and limitations on the use of any additionally-acquired offcampus properties in the Foggy Bottom/West End neighborhood

Shared Benefits: For The District Establishes a framework for predictable, planned growth guided by smart growth and transit-oriented development principles advanced by the DC Office of Planning Provides opportunities for new business development and enhances the District s tax base Maintains architectural and historic resources that enhance the unique character of Washington, DC through the creation of a potential historic district and the landmark designation of several additional buildings on campus Funds the modernization of one of DC s top public high schools through the SWW public-private partnership Sustains and promotes a world-class university in the District of Columbia

Shared Benefits: For The University Accommodates GW s forecasted academic and student housing space needs within the existing Campus Plan boundaries Provides programmatic benefits and promotes efficient use of resources Furthers GW s status as a world-class research university Allows for mixed-use commercial development of Square 54 creating a vibrant town center for those who work, study and live in Foggy Bottom providing a key source of non-enrollment driven revenue to support the University s core academic mission

Square 54 Development Partnership Boston Properties/KSI team selected by GW in 2004 after extensive RFI & RFP process, based on: Experience in mixed-use development in the District Vision for the potential of Square 54 Outstanding project and design team Strong financial returns for the University Closely integrated working relationship throughout the planning process and beyond

Community Based Planning Process Working with the Office of Planning, GW developed a comprehensive planning effort to evaluate the future of the Foggy Bottom campus including Square 54 in the context of the surrounding neighborhoods Foggy Bottom Campus & Neighborhood Study Urban Land Institute Advisory Services Panel ANC 2A, OP, GW co-sponsored series of open community meeting (moderated by independent facilitator) Additional meetings and outreach and engagement with District agencies Issues Exhibit Two website resources www.neighborhood.gwu.edu www.square54.com

Vision for Square 54 Mixed-use development World class design Housing, employment, neighborhood-serving retail opportunities First-class team of architects and design professionals Project will serve as a model of outstanding transit-oriented development

Planning for Square 54 Planning effort informed by comprehensive communitybased planning process Urban Land Institute Panel Evaluated the redevelopment potential of Square 54 Recommended mixed-use commercial development Density between 7.0 and 8.0 FAR Office use on Pennsylvania Avenue Residential component along I Street Project should consist of multiple structures Open spaces major element in design concept www.square54.com

Proposal for Square 54 PUD submission consistent with ULI panel findings and responsive to issues raised during the community-based planning process Height of office building set at 90 at Washington Circle Top floors set back to articulate façade Project designed as multiple structures 26,000 square foot internal courtyard Internal and below-grade loading facilities 60-foot wide retail plaza on I Street 84,000 square feet of at & below-grade retail space, including neighborhood-serving grocery store

Public Benefits & Amenities 84,000 square foot (at & below grade) retail program including neighborhood-serving grocery store 13% of total residential units dedicated to affordable (8%) and workforce (5%) housing Below grade loading facility and parking Traffic signal at 22nd & I Retail plaza, internal courtyard, and streetscape improvements Sustainable design elements commitment to LEED score of 16 on both residential and office structures green roof components Superior architecture and design