Roy L. Wickland 15 Belvedere Avenue - Belvedere, CA 94920

Similar documents
- INVITATION - COURTESY INFORMATIONAL MEETING

- INVITATION - COURTESY INFORMATIONAL MEETING

DATE: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF FEBRUARY 24, 2016

City of Fort Lupton Administrative Site Plan Process

4 September 14, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT:

CITY OF SAN MATEO ORDINANCE NO

Notice of Preparation (NOP) of an Environmental Impact Report and Public Scoping Meeting for the Alameda Shipways Residential Project

City of Reedley Community Development Department 1733 Ninth Street Reedley, CA (559) FAX

City of Larkspur. Notice of Mitigated Negative Declaration for the 285

NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF A DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING: VERMONT CORRIDOR PROJECT

Environmental Review Part 55 Floodplain Management Subpart C. 8-Step Decision Making Process

SPECIFIC PLAN Requirements

AGENDA 07/14/11 PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting

Notice of Preparation and Notice of Public Scoping Meeting. At Dublin Project

D3 January 14, 2015 Public Hearing

Certificate of Determination EXEMPTION FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

NOTICE OF PREPARATION ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING

NOTICE OF PREPARATION

County of Los Angeles

4 January 11, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT:

NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

City of Del Mar. Del Mar Resort Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report Notice of Preparation

REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION

SOMERSWORTH CODE FIRE PREVENTION AND LIFE SAFETY CHAPTER 21

11 March 9, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT: BUDDHIST EDUCATION CENTER OF AMERICA DONG HUNG TEMPLE, INC. PROPERTY OWNER: MOY FAMILY, LLC

Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report and Scoping Meeting for the Canyon Lane Roadway Improvements Development Project

Glenborough at Easton Land Use Master Plan

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

RD:VMT:JMD 10/14/2015 RESOLUTION NO.

ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF CYPRESS 5275 Orange Avenue Cypress, California (714) DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PERMIT PROCESS

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. House Bill 2386

BYLAW 5542 *******************************************************************************

MOBILE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION LETTER OF DECISION. October 22, 2010

CITY OF BELVEDERE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY

Santa Barbara County Planning Commission May 11 th, Cuyama Valley Conservancy vs. Troesh Diamond Rock Mine

NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY (NOA) OF A DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 2190 Shattuck Avenue Mixed-Use Project

City of Fort Lupton Site Plan Process

BULLETIN #1 Summerfield/Riverwalk Fencing Criteria

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE

RESOLUTION NO: WHEREAS, the subject property has a Public, Semi-Public (PS) zoning designation and a General Plan designation of Institutional; and

CLARK COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT Fire Prevention Bureau

Appendix I. Checklists

6 PORT SYDNEY SETTLEMENT AREA

September 20, 2017 ENV EIR

CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD IBOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Coast Highway APN

Article 3: Police Regulated Occupations and Businesses. Division 37: Burglary, Robbery and Emergency Alarm Systems

SECTION 39. Title V, Chapter 6, Article 2, added to the Zoning Code of Sacramento County shall read as follows: GREENBACK LANE SPECIAL PLANNING AREA

MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES BUILDING

Pismo Beach, CA Municipal Code. Chapter 8.08 FIRE PREVENTION REGULATIONS

PRELIMINARY CONDITIONAL USE SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST REQUIREMENTS

ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY BERKELEY CITYWIDE POOLS MASTER PLAN

AWH REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

STAFF REPORT FOR STANDARD COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT #CDP FEBRUARY 26, 2015 CPA - 1 PO BOX 238 APTOS, CA 94001

PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT LIST. FORM B STATEMENT OF GROUNDS To be completed by Referral Authorities and objectors

Errata 1 Landmark Apartments Project Final Environmental Impact Report

ORDINANCE NO. 430 REGARDING WATER CONSERVATION

~P'~'~; SAN FRANCISCO

MEMORANDUM HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS. SHERI REPP LOADSMAN, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER/ PLANNING & BUILDING DIRECTOR /s/

HILLSIDE BUILDING COMMITTEE PLAN REVIEW DIRECTIONS

CITY OF ALHAMBRA DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 111 S. First Street. Alhambra, CA (626) FAX (626)

Request Conditional Rezoning (R-15 Residential to Conditional A-24 Apartment) Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Jimmy McNamara

Draft TISCORNIA ESTATE SPECIFIC PLAN/EIR

APPLICATION FOR Large Family Day Care Permit

Crossroads Hollywood, ENV EIR 1 message

CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH STAFF REPORT. THROUGH: Marisa Lundstedt, Director of Community Development

Minister of the Environment Representative

CHAIR AND MEMBERS PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE JOHN M. FLEMING MANAGING DIRECTOR, PLANNING AND CITY PLANNER

MINUTES OF TOWN BOARD MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 18, 2017 AT 7:00 PM AT TOWN HALL, ONE OVEROCKER ROAD POUGHKEEPSIE, NEW YORK

Staff Report. Conditional Use PLANNING DIVISION COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. Salt Lake City Planning Commission

*BOLDED ITEMS ARE REQUIRED* *The more info provided, the more detailed your comments from staff will be.* Project Name

PLANNING DEPARTMENT TRANSMITTAL TO THE CITY CLERK S OFFICE

Application for Certification for an Alarm System Contractor

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the proposed Master Plan for Villa Esperanza (VE), located at 2116

Attachment 4. TRPA Environmental Documentation, IEC/MFONSE

REQUEST FOR CHANGE TO APPROVED AMBASSADOR WEST PROJECT AND VARIANCE #I 1669 FOR 182 SOUTH ORANGE GROVE BOULEVARD (MAYFAIR MANSION)

Zoning OBJECTIVE: in the zoning. is to make. projects for. the Planning and. are attached ITTALS: Department

The principal elements of the NTC Strategic Vision plan are as follows.

TO: CITY COUNCIL DATE: MARCH 23,2009

Subject: 30 Otis Street, Evaluation of Shadow on Proposed 11th and Natoma Park

3.1 community vision. 3.3 required plan elements

PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO GREEN LINE MIXED USE SPECIFIC PLAN

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY

TRI-LAKES MONUMENT FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT

NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF A DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

DRAW SEVEN PARK RENOVATION PROJECT SOMERVILLE, MASSACHUSETTS

646 Kingston Road - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

Chapter RM MULTI FAMILY BUILDING ZONES

CITY OF SOCORRO, TEXAS REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE DESIGN SERVICES FOR PROPOSED MAURO ROSAS PARK

CITY OF BERKELEY. Permit Service Center 2120 Milvia St Berkeley, CA 94704

LEGAL NOTICE. City of Tacoma Determination of Environmental Nonsignificance. Fred Wagner, Wagner Development. Demolition of Manitou school buildings

NOTICE OF PREPARATION and ANNOUNCEMENT OF SCOPING MEETINGS

ALBEMARLE COUNTY CODE CHAPTER 18 ZONING SECTION 20A NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL - NMD

12 February 9, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT: WILDLIFE RESPONSE, INC.

Town of Malta Planning Board 2540 Route 9 Malta, NY (518) Fax: (518)

Chapter 1 - General Design Guidelines CHAPTER 1 GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINES

No comments related to land use and planning issues were received in response to the Notice of Preparation.

CITY OF BELVEDERE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. AGENDA ITEM: 3 MEETING DATE: March 20, 2018 TO: City of Belvedere Planning Commission

Design Review Commission Report

Transcription:

Roy L. Wickland 15 Belvedere Avenue - Belvedere, CA 94920 June 19, Ms. Irene Borba Director of Planning and Building City of Belvedere ~1anning Department 450 San Rafael Avenue Belvedere, CA 94920 JUN. Z017 Subject: Response to Initial Study/Proposed MND 135 Belvedere Avenue APN Nos. 060-181-06 through 08 Project Sponsor: Amalfi 135 Belvedere, LLC State Clearing House No. 052058 Dear Ms. Borba: I reside at 15 Belvedere A venue in Belvedere, California. I have reviewed the Initial Study/Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration (the "Initial Study") for 135 Belvedere Avenue, and am submitting these comments in accordance with the "Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration" issued for the project by the City of Belvedere Director of Planning and Building on May 20,. A photocopy of the Notice oflntent is attached. My wife and I do not have a problem or issue with the new residence and ancillary structures proposed for 135 Belvedere Avenue. However, we are extremely concerned and object to the fact that the Initial Study fails to acknowledge, let alone analyze or mitigate, the traffic and parking impacts that will occur during the construction phase of the project. The Initial Study indicates that the project will consist of a home and other structures aggregating almost 12,500 square feet, a 108 foot long, 875 square foot fixed pier, platform and boat lifts, and a hillavator. Other improvements will include an auto court, guest parking, a pool, terraces, retaining walls, stairway access to the shoreline, landscaping and bioretention/drainage management areas. From a square footage standpoint, the project appears equivalent to constructing a 16 unit apartment complex, a 10 unit entry level infill development or a mid-sized office building. The applicant is requesting a two year construction time limit, during which time a meaningful level of construction traffic to and from the project will undoubtedly take place. However, the only mention of construction generated traffic in the Initial Study is a statement that the project will necessitate a total of approximately 202 loads of off soil and demolition debris off-haul. This means that demolition/grading alone will generate a total of at least 404 dump truck trips (202 in and 202 out). Nowhere in the document is there any attempt to quantify the vehicle trips generated by project deliveries, equipment requirements or the work force engaging in project construction activities.

It is my understanding that the purpose of an initial study is to determine whether an environmental impact report or negative declaration should be prepared. The initial study should fully explain the basis for determining the scope and severity of project impacts. If a particular impact is deemed insignificant, the initial study should so state and set forth the standards of significance used to make the determination. Otherwise, a lead agency would be able to provide a superficial analysis (or no analysis at all) in the initial study and then defend its decision to adopt a negative declaration by pointing to the absence of any impacts. Traffic congestion, additional parking requirements and the increased wear and tear on Belvedere Avenue all constitute material aspects of the construction activities associated with the proposed project that are not, but should be, considered in the Initial Study. Belvedere Avenue is a winding, one lane road serving two- way traffic. On many p01iions of Belvedere Avenue, vehicles must utilize pull out areas to yield to passenger cars (let alone trucks) traveling in the opposite direction. In addition, street parking along Belvedere A venue is extremely limited. These facts, considered within the context of the apparent magnitude of the construction planed for 135 Belvedere Avenue, most definitely require analysis in the Initial Study, including the imposition of reasonable mitigation measures. I believe that the Initial Study should be revised as follows: 1. All construction traffic generated by the planned project, not just the truck trips associated with removal of soil off-haul and demolition debris, should be quantified. 2. The level of daily construction traffic should be estimated for the entire two year life of the project. 3. Parking requirements should be quantified for the duration of the project. 4. The wear and tear of construction traffic on the Belvedere Avenue should be described and estimated. 5. The construction traffic/parking impacts of this project should be considered cumulatively with other development proposed in the area. In this regard, I am aware that another large residence is apparently being planned for near term construction at 1 Belvedere A venue. 6. The standards of significance for determining construction traffic/parking impacts should be clearly stated. Based on the information resulting from this increased level of analysis, mitigation measures should be considered. These mitigation measures should, at a minimum, include the following: A. Limiting delivery of materials and equipment to and from the construction site to weekdays between 9:30 AM and 2:00 PM.

B. Prohibiting the parking of delivery trucks and construction equipment on Belvedere Avenue. C. Requiring off street and/or offsite parking for construction workers. D. Requiring an onsite staging and storage area for the delivery/storage of construction equipment and materials. E. Prohibiting or restricting the blockage of Belvedere A venue by construction equipment or delivery vehicles. If blockage is unavoidable, requiring advance review and approval of the date, time and duration of the blockage by the Department of Public Works, as well as advance notice to the neighborhood. F. Designating a specific, required street route for construction site ingress and egress. G. Performing pre-construction and post construction surveys of Belvedere Avenue, and requiring the project proponent to repair or fund the repair of any damage or increased wear and tear caused by construction traffic. Including a traffic/parking analysis with appropriate mitigations in the Initial Study will facilitate compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and insure that the project is constructed with a minimum of disruption to what the Initial Study describes as a "park-like and semi-rural" neighborhood. Yours truly, Roy L. Wickland R~W-~~G cc: Jayni Allsep

NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION for 135 Belvedere Avenue APN 060-181-06, 060-181-07 and 060-181-08 To: Owners of Property Contiguous to Project Site From: City of Belvedere Marin County Clerk 450 San Rafael Avenue State Clearinghouse Belvedere, CA 94920 Responsible Agencies and Trustee Agencies Interested Members of the Public The City of Belvedere is the Lead Agency and has prepared an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project described below. Adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and consideration of project applications are scheduled before the City of Belvedere Planning Commission on June 20, at 6:30 p.m. The public review period is from May 22 to June 20, Project: 135 Belvedere Avenue - Demolition Permit, Design Review, Conditional Use Permit, Exception to Floor Area, Variance, Second Unit Permit, Lot Merger, Construction Time Limit Extension and Revocable License applications for New Single-Family Horne, Accessory Dwelling Unit (Second Unit), Private Pier and other Site Improvements Project Applicant: Amalfi 135 Belvedere LLC Project Description: The project proposes demolition of existing structures on the property including an existing single family home, detached garage, water tank (currently empty and not connected to well) to make way for construction of a new two-story, 10,340 square-foot, single family residence with attached 1,250 square-foot, 5- car garage, a 750 square-foot accessory (second) dwelling unit; and other improvements including a hillavator, a 128-square-foot boat storage structure, and a fixed pier (875 square feet) that would extend approximately 108 feet from Mean High Water (MHW) seaward into Richardson Bay on a tide lot owned by County of Marin. Installation of a platform lift (96 square feet) and boat lift (12 square feet) is also proposed. The pier would be supported by 25 twelve-inch diameter piles. New retaining walls, auto court, guest parking, landscaping, terraces, pool, stairway to shoreline, bioretention and drainage management areas are also proposed as part of the project. Total lot size would be 53,978 square feet (1.24 acres) based on proposal to merge three lots into one single lot. Project approvals required by the City of Belvedere include: Demolition Permit pursuant to Chapter 16.28 of the Belvedere Municipal Code to remove existing single family home, water tank and garage/carport; Architectural and Environmental Design Review pursuant to Title 20 of the Belvedere Municipal Code for residence, accessory (second) dwelling unit, tree removal, landscaping and other proposed improvements; Exception to Floor Area; Second Unit Permit; Variances for the Second Unit for exceeding the required height limit and for the property exceeding the applicable floor area on which the Second Unit is located (Belvedere Municipal Code Sections 19.78.070 E and Section 19.78.070 C); Request for a 24-month Construction Time Limit; Use Permit pursuant to Title 19 of the Belvedere Municipal Code for private recreational use in R - Recreation Zone; and Revocable License for the construction of private improvements in public right-of-way pursuant to Chapter 272 of the Belvedere Administrative Policy Manual. A copy of the Mitigated Negative Declaration is available at the City Hall and Community Center at 450 San Rafael Avenue, Belvedere from 9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday to Thursday. City offices are closed from 12 p.m. to I p.m. Due to the time limits mandated by State law, our response must be sent at the earliest possible date but not later than June 20,. Please send your com1 en to t~e addre.~s shown above. I. / /2;-;_.J Date: May 20, Signature: 1Z,{_ Title: Telephone: (415) 435-3838 /(.AJ UcJZl/ Director of Planning and Building

'111.!Uff.lt~...,/ /'"",/ --- -..r-, /,....J,r.. ' -'\\, J... \...'\.. "\....\,...-... - ---- --------- ncus:s JIE.t. -------~ ~ a 1 oa.~ ""' 135 Belvedere Ave, Belvedere CA Rendered Site Plan STUDIO-

Gate Entry

Streetside-1

135 Belvedere Ave. Belvedere CA Streetside-2 STUDIO-

Great Room-Upper Level

Living Room

Aerial View-Rear Yard

Guest Studio sruo10

Fire Pit Area-View Toward House sruo100

Fire Pit Area-View Toward Bay

Cabana Area

Pool Terrace Area

I 1 / 135 Belvedere Ave, Belvedere CA Interior View -Lower Great Room

Aerial Night

Water Front