Urban Development Area (UDA) Process in Virginia: History & Requirements

Similar documents
Urban Development Areas Bedford County

DRAFT. Urban Development Areas Fairfax County. UDA Needs Profile: Tysons Corner 13% Location Characteristics. Socio-Economic Characteristics

Urban Development Areas Frederick County

REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF REGIONAL LAND USE

Urban Development Areas Albemarle County

CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

Status Report: MD 355 Project

Blueprint Denver Task Force Meeting #

Economic Development & Housing Council Committee Comprehensive Plan Update September 20, 2005

Implementation Guide Comprehensive Plan City of Allen

CITY OF PUYALLUP. Background. Development Services

Gloucester Point / Hayes Village

EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Staff Report to the North Ogden City Planning Commission

Town of Oakville Streetscape Strategy

ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts

PINE CURVE REZONING. BACKGROUND Purchased as two parcels in 2001 and 2002

2040 LUP is a part of the Comprehensive Plan and carries the same legal authority. Economic Challenges

The scale of intervention:

Stafford County Strategic Plans

Transit / Housing Oriented Redevelopment

PINE CURVE REZONING. Property does not meet criteria for open space preservation and is not a candidate for a park

Chapter Master Planned Communities (MPC) District

4.1.3 LAND USE CATEGORIES

MAIN STREET ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY

Mobility Districts and Traffic Studies

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

Cumberland Region Tomorrow is a private, non-profit, citizen based regional organization working with Greater Nashville Regional Council

The transportation and land use connection

CHAPTER 1. Ms. Guajardo s Class - Central Elementary CH 1 1

PSRC REVIEW REPORT & CERTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION

CHARLES PUTMAN CHARLES PUTMAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC

MOUNT PLEASANT SECONDARY PLAN & VILLAGE BLOCK PLAN. Wednesday, March 5, 2008 Informal Public Open House

D-O LRT Zoning Discussion. Chapel Hill Boards & Commissions October 16, 2017

TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PINELLAS COUNTY MPO LIVABLE COMMUNITIES INITIATIVE PINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS

G. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT. The following summarizes the Recreation and Open Space Element:

Living in Albemarle County s Urban Places

Tysons Circulator Study: Process and Preliminary Results Summary. March 2012

12/9/2013. HOLLYWOOD/PINES CORRIDOR PROJECT AMPO 2013 Annual Conference October 24, Our Perspective. Broward.

SCARBOROUGH SUBWAY EXTENSION. Scarborough Subway Extension. Final Terms of Reference

Cultivate Hopkins: Built Environment. Comprehensive Plan Advisory Committee September 13, 2017

Future Land Use SAMPLE RECOMMENDATIONS

Local Growth Planning in North Central Green Line Communities

Issues Requiring Future Study

Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG)

1 Adapted from the Statewide Transit-Oriented Development Study by CalTrans, 2006

Planning Commission Report

North Fair Oaks Community Plan Summary and Information

3. VISION AND GOALS. Vision Statement. Goals, Objectives and Policies

FUNDING CORRIDOR REVITALIZATION

Remi Mendoza City Planning Academy March 13, 2017

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

Ridgefield and the Growth Management Act

CITY OF TARPON SPRINGS DCA#11-1AR

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 5H

Unique. Livable. Connected. Sustainable. Anticipate and Manage Change. Variety of Housing Choices. Enhanced Arterial Corridors

Potential Annexation Areas And Annexation

S A C R A M E N T O C O U N T Y JACKSON HIGHWAY & GRANT LINE EAST VISIONING STUDY

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Bourne Downtown Site Planning

Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

1.0 Purpose of a Secondary Plan for the Masonville Transit Village

Urban Development Areas James City County

ITEM #8. Regional Smart Growth Program. Regional Smart Growth Program. Presentation Overview. Coast Highway Vision and Stategic Plan.

TO: Denver Planning Board FROM: Analiese Hock, Senior City Planner DATE: March 13, 2018 RE:

Communities Plan. Parkland-Spanaway-Midland. LUAC Review of Draft Policies

1.0 Introduction. Purpose and Basis for Updating the TMP. Introduction 1

Lesson 6. Corridor Planning

JANUARY 19, 2011 CENTRAL AVENUE-METRO BLUE LINE TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT COMMUNITY FORUM

STAFF SUMMARY FOR S17-02 SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION

NACCED/NACo CONFERENCE JULY 10, 2015

Plan-It Greenville (2009) Comprehensive Plan 5-Year Update

TOD 101 CREATING LIVABLE COMMUNITIES WITH TRANSIT

Land Use and Urban Form

Cobb County Design Guidelines Mableton Parkway & Veterans Memorial Highway Community Design Workshop January 12, 2017

178 Carruthers Properties Inc.

VILLAGE OF CLEMMONS PLANNING BOARD DRAFT STAFF REPORT

6 Growth Management Challenges and Opportunities

Horizon 2035 Land Use and Transportation Element

BROOKHILL NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL ZONING MAP AMENDMENT PREFACE TO APPLICATION

Chapter 4. Linking Land Use with Transportation. Chapter 4

LAND USE AMENDMENT DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL CORE (WARD 7) MACLEOD TRAIL SE AND 5 AVENUE SE BYLAW 254D2017

1.0 Future Land Use. 1.1 Introduction. 1.2 Future Land Use Objectives

8implementation. strategies

CHAPTER 7: VISION AND ACTION STATEMENTS. Noble 2025 Vision Statement

RESOLUTION NO. R Refining the route, profile and stations for the Downtown Redmond Link Extension

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN & UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE

SAN RAFAEL GENERAL PLAN 2040 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW

TOWN OF NEW CASTLE - Master Plan Update

Introduction. Chapter 1. Purpose of the Comprehensive Plan Plan Organization Planning Process & Community Input 1-1

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

ForwardDallas! Comprehensive Plan. City Council Briefing February 15, 2006

Land Use Amendment in Southwood (Ward 11) at and Elbow Drive SW, LOC

EXHIBIT A. Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 1 (Town Center) First Amended Project Plan 1

John M. Fleming Managing Director, Planning and City Planner. Old East Village Dundas Street Corridor Secondary Plan Draft Terms of Reference

Blueprint Denver A BLUEPRINT FOR AN INCLUSIVE CITY. Executive Summary

Prepared for the Citizens of Forsyth County by the City-County Planning Board

Transcription:

Urban Development Area (UDA) Process in Virginia: History & Requirements J. Kelli Nash Office of Intermodal Planning and Investment VDOT Coordinating Transportation & Land Use Forum Thursday, June 2, 2016 Culpeper, Virginia

Today s Conversation Brief history and purpose of UDAs UDAs in the VTrans Multimodal Transportation Plan (VMTP) UDA Grants and Grantee Highlight 2

What is a UDA? A UDA is defined as (Section 15.2-2223.1): Areas designated by a locality that may be sufficient to meet projected residential and commercial growth in the locality for an ensuing period of at least 10 but not more than 20 years. Where an urban development area in a county includes planned or existing rail transit, the planning horizon may be for an ensuing period of at least 10 but not more than 40 years. Areas that may be appropriate for development at a density on the developable acreage of at least four single-family residences, six townhouses, or 12 apartments, condominium units or cooperative units per acres and an authorized floor area ratio of at least 0.4 per acre for commercial development, or any combination thereof Urban development areas shall incorporate principles of traditional neighborhood design (TND). 3

Purpose of UDAs Why strategically plan for UDAs? The problem: Dispersed development patterns increase the financial burden of maintaining and expanding the transportation system. The purpose: Improve the future efficiency of the transportation system. Compact development and traditional neighborhood design (TND) alleviate the transportation system impacts of low density/single use development By locating residences and businesses closer together and in areas with existing infrastructure, new development requires less new system capacity and less overall maintenance By mixing uses together, communities require shorter trips to access daily needs. More trips can be completed by walking and biking. 4

FROM THIS: Arterial spines carry all trips Typical 6-lane arterials needed Separated land uses = longer trips All trips by automobile Bottlenecks for emergency access Higher personal transportation costs More/wider roads = more public costs TO THIS: Distributed road network spine arterials free of local traffic Mixed uses = shorter trips Communities, not Subdivisions Better routes for emergency access Bike/Pedest. options for short trips More cost efficient More Safety, Less $$, Better Quality of Life 5

UDAs in Virginia Timeline Frederick County, VA, adopts a UDA Virginia General Assembly added Section 15.2-2223.1 to the Code of Virginia requiring high growth localities to designate UDAs in their comprehensive plans UDAs are more broadly defined, designation now voluntary 1987 2007 2010 2012 2014 Legislation amended to establish density and design criteria for UDAs and to improve transportation and land use coordination VDOT administered UDA Local Government Assistance Program HB-2 promote urban development areas 6

UDAs in Virginia Timeline UDA Needs Assessments Completed Grant Program Reinvigorated 2014 2015 2016 HB-2 and VTrans promote urban development areas UDA Research and Outreach Begins Grant Program Continues, UDAs continue to be added 7

UDAs in Virginia Timeline UDA Needs Assessments Completed Grant Program Reinvigorated 2014 2015 2016 HB-2 and VTrans promote urban development areas UDA Research and Outreach Begins Grant Program Continues, UDAs continue to be added 8

Evolution of UDAs HB2 Project Prioritization HB2 Provided for the development of a prioritization process for projects funded by the CTB: Candidate projects and strategies shall be screened by the CTB to determine whether they are consistent with the assessment of capacity needs for all: Corridors of statewide significance Regional networks, and Improvements to promote urban development areas (established pursuant to 15.2-2223.1, undertaken in the Statewide Transportation Plan in accordance with 33.1-23.03) 9

UDAs in Virginia 2015 Research Focus Needed to Understand: The extent of planning and designated UDAs Extent of other areas with similar characteristics How this list had significantly grown and diversified since the original 2007 legislation. Needed to Produce: A single, current, consistent summary of UDAs and UDAlike areas A summary of their current planning status, diverse socioeconomic and transportation characteristics, and anticipated future conditions of these areas List of locations and attributes before asking about needs 10

UDAs in Virginia 2015 Research Process Finding UDAs & Designated Growth Areas Recipients from 2010/2011 UDA Local Government Assistance Program Comprehensive plans for high-growth localities responding to DHCD s 2011 survey Top quartile localities in terms of Weldon Cooper Center population projections DRPT Statewide Transit and TDM Plan emerging localities Cities and towns with populations over 130,000 Interview PDCs 11

UDAs in Virginia 2015 Research Process 271 total UDA or UDA-like areas 77 of these areas were currently designated UDAs 21 were areas that were designated as UDAs and had since been reclassified by localities since 2012 173 UDA-like areas in comprehensive plans Jurisdictions: 15% towns, 21% cities, 64% counties Size: Average 3 sq.mi., range from 0.02 sq.mi. to 55 sq.mi. Existing density: More than half are less than 500 persons/sq.mi. 12 Location: 60% in rural/exurban/suburban localities

Initial Research Findings 13

UDAs in Virginia Timeline UDA Needs Assessments Completed Grant Program Reinvigorated 2014 2015 2016 HB-2 and VTrans promote urban development areas UDA Research and Outreach Begins Grant Program Continues, UDAs continue to be added 14

VMTP Needs Assessment Three Scales: CoSS CAPACITY & OPERATIONS NEEDS UDAs Regional Networks 15

VMTP Needs Assessment UDA Needs Assessment Guiding Principles Focus on promoting growth consistent with intent of UDA legislation by assessing: Context sensitive multimodal transportation solutions Last-mile access to jobs and non-work attractions Bicycle and pedestrian circulation Safety Connections to local multimodal networks and regional transportation options LOCALLY Driven 16

VMTP Needs Assessment UDA Guiding Principles CoSS RNs UDAs STATEWIDE FOCUS LOCAL FOCUS 17

UDA NEEDS Update on VTrans Multimodal Transportation Plan 2025 Needs Assessment 18

Ongoing UDA Needs Assessment Needs Assessment Report Statewide Data + 84 UDA Profiles Summaries 19

UDAs in Virginia Timeline UDA Needs Assessments Completed Grant Program Reinvigorated 2014 2015 2016 HB-2 and VTrans promote urban development areas UDA Research and Outreach Begins Grant Program Continues, UDAs continue to be added 20

Evolution of UDAs 2015 and 2016 Grant Program Goal: Promote economic development and quality of life, and promote the coordination between transportation and land use planning Grant Program - Assistance available for localities interested in: Conducting planning to identify and designate newly identified UDAs, Updating plans for areas already designated as UDAs, Updating similarly designated growth area plans to meet the legislated characteristics of UDAs, Revising as appropriate applicable land use ordinances (including appropriate zoning classifications and subdivision ordinances) to incorporate the principles of traditional neighborhood design (see 15.2-2223.1 of the Code of Virginia), Assisting with public participation processes, and other related tasks. 21

2015 UDA Grant Projects City of Salem City of Norfolk Town of Christiansburg Town of Amherst Town of Vinton City of Hampton City of Hopewell Town of Herndon Town of Strasburg Albemarle County

2016 UDA Grant Projects Franklin County Town of Warrenton Botetourt Salem #2

Salem UDA Challenges and Opportunities facing Salem: Gateway/economic corridors in transition Public enthusiasm for strengthening downtown Current and future infrastructure needs Roanoke College

Project Schedule Task 1: Project Initiation and Scoping Task 2: Analysis of UDA site Models Task 3: UDA Designation and Implementation April-June 2015 July-August 2015 September-October 2015

Public Input Extensive Key Stakeholder Sessions Multiple Planning Commission meetings Public Open House Enthusiastic Support for UDA Vision GOALS Strengthen Downtown Promote Infill Development Establish Multimodal Gateways Alleviate Traffic

Multimodal Analysis Multimodal analysis based on DRPT System Design Guidelines Motorized + Non-motorized Networks Walkability Analysis

Urban Development Areas

Strengthen Downtown Core Urban Design Framework City Core UDA Centralize Parking (potential garage) Redevelop surface parking lots Infill Residential

Garage + Infill Concept City Core UDA Infill Development Prototype Precedents

Mixed-Use Corridor UDA Gateway to Downtown Aging auto-oriented commercial corridor Ongoing VDOT multimodal road improvement project Develop a future mix of uses throughout the corridor to tie to downtown Urban Design Framework

Mixed-Use Corridor UDA East Main Street Prototype Precedents

Gateway to Downtown Urban Design Framework Village Core UDA Village Center for south Salem Manage the transition of Apperson Drive from residential to commercial Develop multimodal connections to the Village Center and Downtown

Village Center Prototype Village Core UDA Apperson Drive Prototype Precedents

UDA Designation The City of Salem unanimously adopted the three Urban Development Area designations into their comprehensive plan on September 28, 2015

Evolution of UDAs Transportation s Role in Promoting UDAs? Local Comprehensive Planning Grant Program UDAs More efficient utilization and resource allocation Promote development and support travel needs Transportation VMTP Needs Assessment HB-2 36

Thank You for Your Time & Apply for a UDA Grant Today! J. Kelli Nash Jacklyn.nash@governor.virginia.gov 804 393 1867 37