FLACS-Risk Unique 3D risk modelling software. FLACS-Risk: Product presentation FLUG May 2016

Similar documents
FLACS-Fire. Djurre Siccama Gexcon R&D and Software VP Products. FLUG 3 rd - 4 th. November 2015, Shanghai China

Using CFD to Analyze Gas Detector Placement in Process Facilities

TOXIC AND FLAMMABLE GAS CLOUD DETECTORS LAYOUT OPTIMIZATION USING CFD

Evaluation of the Tianjin explosion and comparisons to the West Fertilizer Explosion. A review of risk management yesterday, today and tomorrow.

AVOID CATASTROPHIC SITUATIONS: EXPERT FIRE AND GAS CONSULTANCY OPTIMIZES SAFETY

Optimization of gas detectors

AVOID CATASTROPHIC SITUATIONS: EXPERT FIRE AND GAS CONSULTANCY OPTIMIZES SAFETY

FLACS-based gas detection layout optimisation and the roll-out of the FLACS-HPC service

CFD OIL 2008 COMPUTATIONAL MODELING OF JET FIRES. August 19th, 2008 Norman Neumann Marcelo Mendes

Laser-based gas detection technology and dispersion modeling used to eliminate false alarms and improve safety performance on Terra Nova FPSO

GAS DETECTOR LOCATION. Ø.Strøm and J.R. Bakke, GexCon AS, Norway

How to Use Fire Risk Assessment Tools to Evaluate Performance Based Designs

Fire and Gas Mapping- Updates to ISA84 TR7

The IEC Certification Process. Introduction to Windflow

Aspirating Gas Detection CFD Modelling Predicts Application Performance

Standoff CWA/TIC Detection. Innovation with Integrity. Toxic Gas/Vapour Threat Mitigation RAPIDplus CBRNE

HF Experience transfer from incidents HFC Trondheim, Oct

Research Needs for the Fire Safety Engineering Profession

Heating and Drying Ovens HeatEvent

Retrospective Hazard Review

Gas Detection in Process Industry The Practical Approach

Conducting a NFPA 652 Dust Hazard Analysis (DHA): Practical Tips & Approaches

ELC International Inc

Y. ORMIERES. Fire risk analysis method for nuclear installations

International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development

Heating and Drying Cabinets HeatEvent

Critical Equipment Monitoring

Sprinklers Modeling for Tunnel Road Fire Fighting

Optimized fan system design for the one-year cycle of a Heat Pump. Ziehl-Abegg SE Frieder Lörcher

VERIFICATION OF AN AEROSOL LEAK DETECTOR FOR THE ALTERNATIVE TO THE WATERBATH METHOD FOR RAUPACK LIMITED

COMPARISON OF NFPA AND ISO APPROACHES FOR EVALUATING SEPARATION DISTANCES

MSA Flame & Gas Mapping

Case Study 1 Underground Car Park

Use of Dispersion Modeling Software In Ammonia Refrigeration Facility Design. By: Martin L. Timm, PE Corporate Process Safety Manager

MATLAB & Simulink for Cyber Physical Systems

HICOSYS FOR PROCESS CONTROL OF SPRAY DRYERS

Lesson 11 Internet Connected Environment (Weather, Air Pollution and Forest Fire) Monitoring

Sensor Placement Algorithm for Rapid Theatre Assessment (SPARTA)

Water Mist-Based Fire Suppression Modelling of an Office Space Scenario

MODELING OF THE SINGLE COIL, TWIN FAN AIR-CONDITIONING SYSTEM IN ENERGYPLUS

ICHEME SYMPOSIUM SERIES NO. 144 A METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSING AND MINIMISING THE RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH FIREWATER RUN-OFF ON OLDER MANUFACTURING PLANTS

2019 Price List. Company Overview. Gateways. Super Gateways. paragonrobotics.com GW3 GW10

CHOOSING A FIRE VENTILATION STRATEGY FOR AN UNDERGROUND METRO STATION

Tunnel Fire Dynamics and Evacuation Simulations

Fire protection of emergency electrical devices: effect on the level of risk a case study of a rail tunnel

Developing a fire model for offshore QRA

SIHI dry Dry running vacuum pumps

Refining and Petrochemical Heater trouble shooting

state of the art methane leak detection CHARM and GasCam 2011 October 13 th Dr. Axel Scherello

SAFETY MANAGER SC Ensure safety, simplify operations and reduce lifecycle costs

ISO/TR TECHNICAL REPORT. Reaction-to-fire tests Full-scale room tests for surface products Part 2: Technical background and guidance

Protect your people, assets and environment while ensuring operational performance.

Firefighter Safety in Battery Energy Storage System Fires

Saving lives with coatings

SH 242 ADAPTIVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM DEPLOYMENT

A case study for integrated modelling of personnel evacuation with pool fire simulation to increase safety in design for offshore oil and gas projects

Critical Equipment Monitoring for Upstream Operations. Copyr i ght 2014 O SIs oft, LLC.

Safety by Design. Phone: Fax: Box 2398, RR2, Collingwood, ON L9Y 3Z1

Chapter 1 Introduction

TAB 06 SAFETY PLAN 1. Scope of Work for the Safety Plan 2. Organizational Safety Information Organizational Policies and Procedures

Benefits and Hidden Dangers in the Application of ISA TR in the Petrochemical Industry

COSTCO, SAN FRANCISCO A PRESCRIPTIVE AND PERFORMANCE BASED ANALYSIS OF FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS AND DESIGN

femto newsletter 2013/4 Femto on Jetfire Top Partner award 3 Bullet impact 6 Femto on JetFire 4 Happy holidays 8

Remote Monitoring of Offshore Structures using Acoustic Emission.

Reducing the Carbon Footprint of Existing Domestic Heating: A Non-Disruptive Approach

APPLICATION BULLETIN COMBUSTION TURBINE FACILITIES. Overview

Explosion Protection Engineering Principles

Gothenburg dance hall, Sweden, 1998

Real Time Pipeline Leak Detection on Shell s North Western Ethylene Pipeline

Safety Integrity Verification and Validation of a High Integrity Pressure Protection System to IEC 61511

A Numerical study of the Fire-extinguishing Performance of Water Mist in an Opening Machinery Space

A new view on building protection. Cerberus DMS makes building protection smarter, easier and more flexible. Answers for infrastructure.

Underground fires in metro systems failures, accidents and terrorism

power-saving period in summer, in which one of the indoor units was forced to change from a cooling mode to a fan mode, was introduced, and the effect

Operational Concept Description (OCD)

AC2000 Security Hub Security and Event Management System

CFD Analysis of Fire Characteristics on Subway Junction Station

AP1000 Advanced Control Room

2013 Honeywell Users Group EMEA. Adrian Fielding Security from Day One

2015 Functional Safety Training & Workshops

CHAM Case Study Numerical Simulation of a Air-to-air Cross-flow Heat Exchanger

Strathayr, Rhu-Na-Haven Road, Aboyne, AB34 5JB, Aberdeenshire, U.K. Tel: +44 (0)

Design specifications and test of the HMPID s control system prototype in the ALICE experiment

Cast Line Heaters The Benefits of This Space Saving Electric Heater

Survey of the Burning Behaviour of the Refrigerant HFO-1234yf Brief Report

Efficient thermal management for batteries 3 rd International Conference Thermal Management for EV/HEV 25. June 2013

Passive Fire Protection DuraSystems Barriers Inc.

Makatec. Spiral Heat Exchanger. for Heating and Cooling

Emergency Ventilation System Design - Preliminary Report Shishir Gupta

R&D for the improvement of O&M in CSP plants. Dr. Marcelino Sánchez. - November,

COMPETENCE. Lead Fire Warden. Standard Title Lead Fire Warden Competence Assessment Standard Lead Fire Warden Competence Assessment Standard

Nedap Cow Positioning with integrated Heat Detection and Health Monitoring

CFD Analysis of a 24 Hour Operating Solar Refrigeration Absorption Technology

Agent Dissemination Devices

AGT 1 Confined Space. Authorised Gas Tester 1. Scienco Limited. Authorised Gas Tester 1 1

ASSESSMENT OF FIRE BEHAVIOUR OF TIMBER PARTITION MATERIALS WITH A ROOM CALORIMETER

Artificial Trees and Fire Performance

DEEPWATER PATHFINDER EMERGENCY RESPONSE MANUAL VOLUME 1 OF 2

Frameworx 16.0 Product Conformance Certification Report CENX V6.1

GEA Ultra-Denco. GEA Heat Exchangers / HVAC Systems. Close Climate Control for IT Environments. Reliability with low power consumpstion

Transcription:

FLACS-Risk Unique 3D risk modelling software

Outline FLACS-Risk Overview Motivation for developing FLACS-Risk Features of FLACS-Risk v1.0 Development process and timeline Possible future added modules FLACS-Risk Interface Demo Case Study: Hydrogen Refuelling Station Early Adopters Programme

FLACS-Risk is a new, unique software solution for 3D CFD risk modelling and visualisation. 3D visualisation of risk to: Efficiently communicate and improve risk-owners understanding of safety issues Reduces the cost of design, engineering and construction More efficient workflows reduces man hours and leadtime of running simulations by more than 25 % Will standardise methodology for safety studies

Motivation Drag forces [kpa] Object 10-4 /year 10-5 /year Piping in Module M21 65 380 Frequency of exceeding explosion overpressure 1.00E-03 Local panels Global panels 1.00E-04 Frequency (per year) 1.00E-05 1.00E-06 1.00E-07 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 Pressure (barg) Traditional manner of reporting explosion study results

Motivation Global wall value approx. 1.0 bar However local hot spot of 1.5-2 bar Global module value approx. 0.5 bar FLACS-Risk: NEW 3D risk visualisation of 10-4/year Explosion overpressures

FLACS-Risk Development 50%-75% of work in initial FLACS-Risk development is building the framework to efficiently move from running a hand full (1-20) to many (100s-1000s) simulations One of the Amazon distribution centres

FLACS-Risk Initial v1.0 Release Our goal: Allow users to easily and efficiently perform risk-based safety studies using FLACS. Functionality Primarily focus on input to design (e.g. Design Accidental Load) Limitations v1.0 release: Ventilation, dispersion and fire modelling Steady state and transient modelling UKOOA ignition model Single module/area

Example: Event Tree in FLACS-Risk Ignition t=0s Fire Results In case of burn back after explosion Ignition t=60s Explosion Results Ignition t=600s FLACS-Risk v1.1 & v1.2 Ventilation Results Flammable and/or Toxic Dispersion Results FLACS-Risk v1.0

Example Reporting: Dispersion Improved intermediate results reporting (e.g. box plots)

Frequency [1/yr] Example Reporting: Risk Contours 1D exceedance curves for specified targets (e.g. fire walls, equipment etc) 2D and 3D risk visualisation (showing spacial distribution of risk based loads) Show contributions from different events and/or scenario properties (e.g. gas type, release rate etc.) 2D 3D 1D Overpressure [barg]

3D Risk Visualisation

FLACS-Risk Development Timeline FLACS-Risk v1.0 Flammable & Toxic dispersion and jet fires only Steady state only Focus on input to design (e.g. Heat radiation, cloud size) FLACS-Risk v1.1 Extend functionality to include explosions Multiple modules/area Seamless integration with FLACS-HPCC (High Performance Computing) FLACS-Risk v1.2 Add time dependent release and ignition model FLACS-Risk v2.0 Improve/develop models/methodology/event trees Target release dates Q3-Q4 2016 Q1-Q2 2017 2017 2017 or 2018 Risk framework development started FLACS-Risk development started Internal Testing External early adopters FLACS-Risk v1.0 FLACS-Risk v1.1 FLACS-Risk v1.2 FLACS-Risk v2.0 Continuous development, optimisation, validation and testing Today 2010 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Possible Future FLACS-Risk Add-on Modules Detection add-on Optimise gas and fire detection layout Quantitative Risk Assessment add-on (offshore) Risk to personnel and people Escalation Potentially escape route impairment FEA add-on Interface with finite element (FEA) structural response modelling software in FLACS-Risk Single Degree of Freedom (SDOF) models

FLACS-Risk: Interface Demo

Interface Demo Overview Visual prototype: Final product may look different

Interface Demo Video Visual prototype: Final product may look different

FLACS-Risk: Hydrogen Refuelling Station Case Study

Case Study: Hydrogen Refuelling Station Summary of isolatable inventory properties Process units and scenarios Pressure [barg] Max leak diameter [mm] Release rate [kg s -1 ] Container with compressor unit 207 19.00 3.55 High pressure storage tanks 1 034 7.16 2.00 Tube trailer 207 12.60 1.59 Dispenser 700 7.16 1.50 Summary of event frequencies for the risk analysis Process units and scenarios Releases [1/yr - ] Jet fires [1/yr] Explosion [1/yr] Container with compressor unit 2.3E-03 5.1E-05 2.6E-05 High pressure storage tanks 1.1E-03 2.5E-05 1.3E-05 Tube trailer 2.2E-03 5.2E-05 2.6E-05 Dispenser 7.1E-04 3.8E-05 1.9E-05

Case study: Hydrogen Refuelling Station

Case Study: Hydrogen Refuelling Station Heat radiation contours with frequency exceeding 10-6 yr -1. Frequency contours, from 10-06 to 10-04 yr-1, for 5 kw m-2 radiation load. Explosion overpressure contours (up to 300 mbar) for frequency exceeding 10-6 yr -1. Fire radiation location based lethality frequencies, from 10-06 to 10-04 yr -1. FLUG Meeting ExxonMobil (UTTC), October 16 th 2014, Houston, TX

FLACS-Risk: Early Adopter Programme

Early Adopter Programme You can get: Early access to the world s #1 decision making tool for asset design Access to a consultant who is dedicated to support your project Training, support and competence building: Advisory/Jumpstart services are central to the delivery A free (time limited) FLACS-Risk license We get: Key references to use in promoting FLACS-Risk Valuable feedback on our product

Early Adopter Programme: How We need five early adopters globally Customers that do not yet have much experience with FLACS-Risk studies Minimum three risk-owners: National and international oil and gas companies Target personnel: Site HSE Managers, Project responsible

Early Adopter Programme: What Project Requirements Small to medium sized facility: both with respect to number of leak locations and calculation domain Flammable/toxic gas dispersion and/or jet-fire risk studies Specific issue where 3D risk results may provide additional value: Some 3D aspect in project: Offshore platform, terrain, buildings or walls near releases Focus on input to design, but may also investigate risk to site personnel on small enough sites No fast-track projects: Delivery dates needs to be flexible +/- two months Low-hanging fruit: re-do an old project

Summary and Conclusion 3D visualisation of risk to: Efficiently communicate and improve risk-owners understanding of safety issues Reduces the cost of design, engineering and construction More efficient workflows reduces man hours and lead-time of running simulations by more than 25 % Will standardise methodology for safety studies FLACS-Risk is a new, unique software solution for 3D CFD risk modelling and visualisation.

Q&A and discussion

Thank you for your attention!